the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...

the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ... the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...

25.04.2013 Views

CARBON CARRYOVER (g s-'1 0 I 0 0 0 N W c. CARBON CARRYOVER (g s-') 0 0 - 0 0 0 N w - CARRYOVER (g 5-'1 0 0 N 0 w 0 c. I I I I CARRYOVER (g s-') 0 0 0 0 N W E ul 294 W D 0 - -a 00 DO --00 UlDpIUl- WWWW xxxx

The influence of particle size distribution on the combustion rates in a batch fed fluidised bed E.S. Garbett and A.B. Hedley Sheffield Coal Research Unit, Department of Chemical Engineering and Fuel Technology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, s1 3JD United Kingdom. Introduction The advantages of burning coal in fluidised bed combustors (FBC) have been repeatedly demonstrated over the past few years and commercial units are now being built and supplied to industry (1). The design of such FBC's is based on the practical experience gained from pilot plant studies and also on the predictions of mathematical models. Central to any model of coal combustion in FBC's is the rate at which particles burn in the bed which determines the carbon loading and hence pollutant emission% heat release rates, coal feed rates and elutriation rates (2). Particle size and temperature usually indicate the controlling mechanism of combustion; large particles and high temperature suggest that diffusion is dominant whereas chemical kinetics became important for small particles and low temperatures (3). In a typical FBC the particle sizes range from that of the maximum of the input feed down to that of particles which are about to be elutriated and particle temperatures can have a value anywhere between the bed temperature Tb and T + 200K (4,5,6). It is not unreasonable to b assume therefore, that the combustion of particles can be controlled by a combination of diffusional and chemical processes acting simultaneously. Indeed, the data of Avedesian and Davidson (7), where the combustion of char particles in a batch fed fluidised bed was assumed to be diffusion controlled, has recently (6) been shown to be consistent with the alternative situation described above where both processes are acting together. The effect on the carbon loading in an FBC where the combustion is either controlled by diffusion or by a combination process has been investigated by Garbett and Hedley (8) who also showed the importance of particle surface temperatures. The particle size distribution of the coal feed is a parameter which is important in the design of FBC's but whose influence on the combustion rates in the bed has not been studied. It is the purpose of this paper therefore, to develop a theory to predict the burnaway, burnout time and particulate phase oxygen concentration in a batch fed FBC and show their dependence on the input particle size distribution which is accurately known. The Model The model of the batch fed FBC employed here is essentially the two-phase bubbling bed model of Avedesian and Davidson (7) where a bed of inert particles at a temperature Tb is fluidised by air at a superficial velocity U and a minimum fluidised velocity U . The oxygen required for combustionOwhich is controlled by a combination diffusion and chemical kinetics, is transferred to the char particles in the particulate phase from the bubbles and the reaction is given by C + O2 -+ CO . The batch is assumed to comprise solely of char particles so that devola&lisation is negl,?cted. It is also assumed that the particles do not swell or break up when introduced to the bed and so retain their original size distribution. The Theory The reaction rate of a single particle of char of mass m in a fluidised bed where both diffusional and chemical kinetics are considered Eimultaneously, can be expressed in terms of diffusional and chemical resistances as follows (3). 295

The influence <strong>of</strong> particle size distribution on <strong>the</strong><br />

combustion r<strong>at</strong>es in a b<strong>at</strong>ch fed fluidised bed<br />

E.S. Garbett and A.B. Hedley<br />

Sheffield Coal Research Unit, Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering and<br />

Fuel Technology, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, Sheffield, s1 3JD<br />

United Kingdom.<br />

Introduction<br />

The advantages <strong>of</strong> burning <strong>coal</strong> in fluidised bed combustors (FBC) have been<br />

repe<strong>at</strong>edly demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed over <strong>the</strong> past few years and commercial units are now<br />

being built and supplied to industry (1). The design <strong>of</strong> such FBC's is based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> practical experience gained from pilot plant studies and also on <strong>the</strong> predictions<br />

<strong>of</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ical models. Central to any model <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> combustion in FBC's<br />

is <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>at</strong> which particles burn in <strong>the</strong> bed which determines <strong>the</strong> carbon<br />

loading and hence pollutant emission% he<strong>at</strong> release r<strong>at</strong>es, <strong>coal</strong> feed r<strong>at</strong>es and<br />

elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es (2). Particle size and temper<strong>at</strong>ure usually indic<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong><br />

controlling mechanism <strong>of</strong> combustion; large particles and high temper<strong>at</strong>ure suggest<br />

th<strong>at</strong> diffusion is dominant whereas chemical kinetics became important for small<br />

particles and low temper<strong>at</strong>ures (3). In a typical FBC <strong>the</strong> particle sizes range<br />

from th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> input feed down to th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> particles which are<br />

about to be elutri<strong>at</strong>ed and particle temper<strong>at</strong>ures can have a value anywhere<br />

between <strong>the</strong> bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure Tb and T + 200K (4,5,6). It is not unreasonable to<br />

b<br />

assume <strong>the</strong>refore, th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion <strong>of</strong> particles can be controlled by a<br />

combin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> diffusional and chemical processes acting simultaneously. Indeed,<br />

<strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a <strong>of</strong> Avedesian and Davidson (7), where <strong>the</strong> combustion <strong>of</strong> char particles<br />

in a b<strong>at</strong>ch fed fluidised bed was assumed to be diffusion controlled, has<br />

recently (6) been shown to be consistent with <strong>the</strong> altern<strong>at</strong>ive situ<strong>at</strong>ion described<br />

above where both processes are acting toge<strong>the</strong>r. The effect on <strong>the</strong> carbon loading<br />

in an FBC where <strong>the</strong> combustion is ei<strong>the</strong>r controlled by diffusion or by a<br />

combin<strong>at</strong>ion process has been investig<strong>at</strong>ed by Garbett and Hedley (8) who also<br />

showed <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> particle surface temper<strong>at</strong>ures. The particle size<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> feed is a parameter which is important in <strong>the</strong> design<br />

<strong>of</strong> FBC's but whose influence on <strong>the</strong> combustion r<strong>at</strong>es in <strong>the</strong> bed has not been<br />

studied. It is <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper <strong>the</strong>refore, to develop a <strong>the</strong>ory to<br />

predict <strong>the</strong> burnaway, burnout time and particul<strong>at</strong>e phase oxygen concentr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

in a b<strong>at</strong>ch fed FBC and show <strong>the</strong>ir dependence on <strong>the</strong> input particle size<br />

distribution which is accur<strong>at</strong>ely known.<br />

The Model<br />

The model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> b<strong>at</strong>ch fed FBC employed here is essentially <strong>the</strong> two-phase<br />

bubbling bed model <strong>of</strong> Avedesian and Davidson (7) where a bed <strong>of</strong> inert particles<br />

<strong>at</strong> a temper<strong>at</strong>ure Tb is fluidised by air <strong>at</strong> a superficial velocity U and a<br />

minimum fluidised velocity U . The oxygen required for combustionOwhich is<br />

controlled by a combin<strong>at</strong>ion diffusion and chemical kinetics, is transferred<br />

to <strong>the</strong> char particles in <strong>the</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>e phase from <strong>the</strong> bubbles and <strong>the</strong> reaction<br />

is given by C + O2 -+ CO . The b<strong>at</strong>ch is assumed to comprise solely <strong>of</strong> char<br />

particles so th<strong>at</strong> devola&lis<strong>at</strong>ion is negl,?cted. It is also assumed th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> particles do not swell or break up when introduced to <strong>the</strong> bed and so retain<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir original size distribution.<br />

The Theory<br />

The reaction r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> a single particle <strong>of</strong> char <strong>of</strong> mass m in a fluidised bed<br />

where both diffusional and chemical kinetics are considered Eimultaneously, can<br />

be expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> diffusional and chemical resistances as follows (3).<br />

295

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!