25.04.2013 Views

the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...

the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...

the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

assumed to be identical to th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> feed <strong>coal</strong>. The solid densities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> char<br />

in Runs A14 and C22 were estim<strong>at</strong>ed from published d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

Two <strong>coal</strong>s were used in <strong>the</strong> present experiments: bituminous <strong>coal</strong> from <strong>the</strong> Ark-<br />

Wright mine in <strong>the</strong> Pittsburgh seam and subbituminous <strong>coal</strong> from <strong>the</strong> Colstrip mine in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Rosebud seam in Rosebud County, Montana. The composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>coal</strong>s is<br />

given in Table 1.<br />

The size distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fuel and bed particles were determined by sieve<br />

analysis. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> size d<strong>at</strong>a for fuel, bed, and char particles were fit by log-<br />

normal distribution functions. The geometric means (mass basis) and standard devia-<br />

tion are listed in Table 2. The sizes were converted to a specific surface area<br />

basis for <strong>the</strong> comput<strong>at</strong>ions. The fluidized combustor oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions and rel-<br />

evant experimental d<strong>at</strong>a are also listed in Table 2. The d<strong>at</strong>a from Runs A14 and C22<br />

were first reported by Beer et a1 (19).<br />

3.3 Comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Measured and Predicted Nitric Oxide Pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

The NO pr<strong>of</strong>iles predicted by <strong>the</strong> model are shown in Figures 4-9, toge<strong>the</strong>r with<br />

<strong>the</strong> experimental d<strong>at</strong>a. When <strong>the</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ion is started <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed surface (solid<br />

line in Figures 4 and 5, dotted line in Figures 6-8) <strong>the</strong> agreement with experiment<br />

is good for Runs A14, C22, and C25; but very poor for Runs C26 and C28, in which<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is a very rapid decrease in NO just above <strong>the</strong> bed, and a discrepancy <strong>of</strong> about<br />

200 mole ppm between <strong>the</strong> predicted and observed NO mole fractions. There are not<br />

enough d<strong>at</strong>a to support a correl<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> this behavior with oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions,<br />

however, it can be seen from <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a in Table 2 th<strong>at</strong> C26 and C28 have <strong>the</strong> lowest<br />

bed temper<strong>at</strong>ures and lowest gas velocities. When calcul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO concentra-<br />

tion for <strong>the</strong>se two runs is started <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> next higher d<strong>at</strong>a point, excellent agree-<br />

ment with experiment is obtained from th<strong>at</strong> point upward (solid lines).<br />

In Run C27 <strong>the</strong> combustor was oper<strong>at</strong>ed using two-stage addition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion<br />

air, with <strong>the</strong> secondary air injector loc<strong>at</strong>ed 1.7m from <strong>the</strong> distributor. The air/fuel<br />

r<strong>at</strong>io in <strong>the</strong> bed was sub-stoichiometric, giving very low NO near <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed.<br />

The increase in NO mole fraction on addition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> secondary air indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong><br />

some fuel nitrogen species, not detected in <strong>the</strong> NO mode <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NOx analyzer, are<br />

present in <strong>the</strong> gas leaving <strong>the</strong> bed. When <strong>the</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO pr<strong>of</strong>ile is begun<br />

after mixing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> secondary air, <strong>the</strong> mechanism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> char entrainment/NO-char<br />

reduction model is still consistent with <strong>the</strong> experimental d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

The predictions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combined model for char entrainment and NO reduction are<br />

in good agreement with <strong>the</strong> observed NO pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>at</strong> distances above 0.5m from <strong>the</strong> bed,<br />

in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> staged air addition; <strong>the</strong> model is not able to account for <strong>the</strong> rapid<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> NO observed in <strong>the</strong> splash zone under some conditions. There are several<br />

phenomena, not incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> model, which might account for a steep gradient in<br />

NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> splash zone. First, <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> NO may only be an apparent<br />

one due to uncertainty in <strong>the</strong> determin<strong>at</strong>ion and weighting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bubble and<br />

emulsion gas compositions. The estim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mixed mean gas composition in <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

(Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 21) depends on <strong>the</strong> model used to estim<strong>at</strong>e partitioning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas between<br />

bubble and emulsion. O<strong>the</strong>r factors may contribute to <strong>the</strong> uncertainty in bed gas<br />

composition, for example, vari<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> sample flow r<strong>at</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

solids <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> probe tip; and mixing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample in <strong>the</strong> probe, sample line, and reaction<br />

chamber <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO analyzer. A second set <strong>of</strong> phenomena which might account for<br />

rapid reduction <strong>of</strong> NO in <strong>the</strong> splash zone is <strong>the</strong> altern<strong>at</strong>e reaction p<strong>at</strong>hways for destruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> NO, including reduction by CO, hydrocarbons, and NH3. Chan (11) has<br />

shown th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO-char reaction is enhanced in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> CO, <strong>the</strong> effect increasing<br />

with decreasing temper<strong>at</strong>ure. Reaction <strong>of</strong> NO and CO, c<strong>at</strong>alyzed by <strong>coal</strong> ash,<br />

is also possible. Mori and Ohtake (29) measured an NO decomposition r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 273 mole<br />

ppm/s.m2 on alumina, in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> 1000 mole ppm CO <strong>at</strong> 1041 K.<br />

The r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> re-<br />

action was approxim<strong>at</strong>ely first order in CO and zeroth order in NO, for NO above 300<br />

mole ppm.<br />

251

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!