the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...
the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ... the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...
600 0 o----o so1 / I I 10 20 PERCENT OVERBED AIR Figure 21 Measured Outlet Gas Concentrations at Various Percent Overbed Air Rates 242
PARTICLE ENTRAINMENT AND NITRIC OXIDE REDUCTION IN THKFREEBOARD OF A FLUIDIZED COAL COMBUSTOR p. M. Walsh, T. Z. Chaung, A. Dutta, J. M. Begr, and A. F. Sarofim 1.0 Introduction The Energy Laboratory and Department of Chemical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 Economic design of fluidized bed combustors requires a combination of fluidizing velocities and particle sizes which result in the unavoidable carry over of bed solids, coal char particles and unburned gaseous combustion products into the freeboard. Depending upon the design parameter% the last 5 to 10% of the combustibles will burn, and also significant reduction of SO2 and NOx will take place, in the freeboard of the fluidized combustor - between the top of the bed and the first row of the convective tube bank. Despite the importance of the freeboard to the effi- cient and clean operation of fluidized combustors,until recently little attention was paid to the understanding of the freeboard reactions. Pereira et a1 (1) and Gibbs et a1 (2) have determined chemical species concentration variation along the height of a 30 x 30 cm cross section fluidized bed and found that significant reduc- tion of NO, takes place above the bed surface. Okada et a1 (3) have shown that the fine sorbent particles entrained into the freeboard will enhance sulfur capture and that the entrained char particles will react with NO, and reduce its emission. In earlier designs of fluidized combustors the problem posed by unacceptably high carbon carry over at fluidizing velocities was resolved by the introduction of the fines precipitated from the flue gas into a "carbon burn-up cell," an uncooled fluidized bed operating at lower fluidizing velocity. In recent designs, instead of the carbon burn-up cell the method of fines reinjection into the fluidized bed is adopted. In order to achieve operational simplicity the fines 'in most practical applications are added to fresh feed and returned into the bed. Fines reinjection significantly increases the fine particle concentration in the bed and in the free- board with the consequence of further enhancing the rate of the heterogeneous reac- tions of char oxidation, and SO2 and NO reduction in the freeboard. Modeling of the freeboard reactions has been hindered by incomplete understand- ing of the processes which govern the entrainment of bed solid particles into the freeboard and the mixing of these solids with the reactant gas. Entrainment models by George and Grace (4), Wen and Chen (5) and Horio et a1 (6) have fulfilled an important role in predicting solids concentration in the freeboard,but due to a dearth of experimental information on entrainment rate as a function of the fluidiza- tion parameters of the bed, these models could not be rigorously tested and developed to the stage where they can be incorporated into FBC combustion models with suffi- cient confidence. The importance of the NO-carbon reaction for the reduction of NO in fluidized combustion of coal was recognized and experimentally demonstrated by Pereira and Be& (7), Gibbs et a1 (2) and Furusawa et a1 (8). Kinetic parameters for this reaction were reported by Be& et a1 (9), Kunii et a1 (10) and Chan (11). Chan also found that the NO-char reaction can be significantly enhanced in the presence of CO. The problems of predicting NO, reduction in the freeboard with sufficient accu- racy are not only due to uncertainties about solids entrainment but also about the relative significance that CO, coal volatiles, volatile nitrogen compounds,or hydro- carbons may have on NO reduction (Sarofim and Begr (12), Yamazaki et a1 (13)). In recent experimental studies at MIT detailed hydrocarbon species concentration mea- surements by Walsh et a1 (14) have shown that CO and hydrocarbon concentrations are high in the "splash zone" immediately above the bed so that their effect on NO reduc- 243
- Page 191 and 192: After the fiscal year 1982, the fol
- Page 193 and 194: MBC CBC Fig. 1 Boiler Structure 193
- Page 195 and 196: \ i Table 2. Coal Properties Planne
- Page 197 and 198: -2- more than 3 years, since 1977.
- Page 199 and 200: , I B. 2 which temporarily raised t
- Page 201 and 202: -6- abrasion rate at the bottom of
- Page 203 and 204: \if F3.3 - Particulate Circulation
- Page 205 and 206: \' I/O. analog 1/13. industrial I/O
- Page 207 and 208: ACQUISITION DATA UNIT < I L- J (T)
- Page 209 and 210: SAMPLING SYSTEM FOR FLUIDIZED BED A
- Page 211 and 212: GAS SAMPLING WITH ORIGINAL PROBE-FI
- Page 213 and 214: Remove the quartz tube (gas sample
- Page 215 and 216: ' ' The modifications have been com
- Page 217 and 218: n n D 217
- Page 219 and 220: With regard to the similarity parti
- Page 221 and 222: i \ ' 2.2. soz Emission and NOx Emi
- Page 223 and 224: 223
- Page 225 and 226: Figure 9: Sulphur captLTre as 0 fun
- Page 227 and 228: P SUMMARY OF TESTS Testing complete
- Page 229 and 230: I Table 1 Comparison of Sulfur Capt
- Page 231 and 232: , NITROGEN OXIDE REDUCTION Single-S
- Page 233 and 234: 0 The addition of air at the 96-inc
- Page 235 and 236: m- Y i? 4: BO n 8 c Y l0- Bo- I I I
- Page 237 and 238: E! w 2 z e Y 100 - 3 t 5 80- 0, 40
- Page 239 and 240: 0 f 0.so o'm: 0.300 0.zo - - A 5m 4
- Page 241: &e- -A \ \ \ : ERCENT OVERBED AIR I
- Page 245 and 246: i 1' 1 ! I. i Chaung (15) showed th
- Page 247 and 248: The maximum height that a large par
- Page 249 and 250: 3.0 Nitric Oxide Reduction in the F
- Page 251 and 252: assumed to be identical to that of
- Page 253 and 254: Nomenclature A *t cD ‘NO $3 _ _ _
- Page 255 and 256: TABLE 2. OPERATING CONDITIONS AND E
- Page 257 and 258: i 1 \ ', References 1. 2. ( 3. 1 4.
- Page 259 and 260: \ ” Y) I 259
- Page 261 and 262: t I 100 - - I I ] , I , I , I 'ii 9
- Page 263 and 264: Feeding of the carbonaceous materia
- Page 265 and 266: ! Table 2 Proximate and ultimate an
- Page 267 and 268: lb, , --pp---p-- 4 p? CHAR 1 Tu-IWO
- Page 269 and 270: I CHAR Y Y /I TIME O i ' ' ' ' 1 '
- Page 271 and 272: could not be assumed constant. Thus
- Page 273 and 274: \ greatly acknowledged. Literature
- Page 275 and 276: constructed and operated to demonst
- Page 277 and 278: The experimental procedure for the
- Page 279 and 280: atmospheric pressure fluidized bed
- Page 281 and 282: 1' TABLE 2 Screen Analysis of Sand
- Page 283 and 284: n RECORDER I Ill I ’ NO. NOX THER
- Page 285 and 286: \ 285 Y 0 I- 5 B 5 3 m "9 E5 3 uz 0
- Page 287 and 288: CHAR1 TOC 0.85 M3/k 600 0 700 V 750
- Page 289 and 290: f Durin all the experimental runs t
- Page 291 and 292: Assuming that large coal particles
600<br />
0<br />
o----o so1<br />
/<br />
I I<br />
10 20<br />
PERCENT OVERBED AIR<br />
Figure 21 Measured Outlet Gas Concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong><br />
Various Percent Overbed Air R<strong>at</strong>es<br />
242