the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...

the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ... the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...

25.04.2013 Views

It has been recognized by many researchers that although ash fusion tests can given useful information regarding the fouling and slagging propensities of coal ashes, there are serious shortcomings. First, the tests are based on subjective observations and not precise scientific measurements, and they have a large margin of error. For example, the ASTM-method which is widely used in many countries allows for a 55 K margin of reproducibility in the initial deformation, softening hemisphere temperatures in an oxidizing atmosphere, and a 70 K margin of uncertainty in determining the initial deformation temperature in a reducing atmosphere. Within that 70 K margin the viscosity can change by an order of magnitude and consequently the rate of ash sintering will change by the same factor. Another, more serious, shortcoming with the ash fusion method is that when testing some coal ashes there occurs an extensive degree of particle-to-particle bonding without any visible sign of deformation in the shape of an ash pellet. It is, therefore, evident that an additional method is needed to assess the sintering characteristics of coal ashes. A choice of sinter measuring techniques is given in Table 2. TABLE 2. REVIEW OF ASH SINTERING TECHNIQUES Measuring Technique Equipment Neck-growth measurements between A furnace and a spherical particles (Kuczynski, microscope 1949), Raask, 1973) Simultaneous shrinkage and electrical conductance measurements (Raask, 1979) Needs a purpose-built furnace assembly for more accurate measure- ments. A simpler version uses platinum wire electrodes as described by Raask (1979) and by Cumming (1980) Crushing strength measure- A furnace and a ments of sintered ash crushing strength pellets (Atting and Barnhard, 1963; Gibb, 1981) measuring device Ash agglomeration by sieving test (Stallman and Neavel (1980) Ash plug flow method A furnace and a sieving machine A tubular furnace tube with perforated plate to support an ash plug Comments ~ This is suitable for homogeneous material when available in the form of spherical particles. It is not suitable for routine sinter testing of coal ashes. Each ash could be provided with sintering rate curves. The method needs to be tested and assessed by different researchers, The method has been used by several researchers but there is no agreed procedure This is one of the simplest methods of testing for initial sintering, and it warrants more systematic tests So far no experimental results have been found in 1 i terature The brief review in Table 2 shows that there are several laboratory methods of sinter testing coal ashes, which can give some useful information regarding their deposit 150

forming propensity. However, none of these techniques could be written as recommended methods, and a coordinated test program involving specialist researchers in different laboratories would be required to assess their general applicability. CONCLUSIONS 1. Frenkel's sintering model is a useful introduction to understanding of the mechanism of formation of boiler deposits in the crucial early stages of particle-to-particle bonding. The model sets out unequivocally the rate controlling parameters in sintering, namely surface tension (the driving force for particle coalescence) viscosity (the temperature sensitive parameter) and particle size. 2. Measurements of the rate of neck-growth between the spherical particles demonstrate the validity of the sintering model, but the technique is not suitable for routine assessment tests of the sintering characteristics of different coal ashes. 3. A method of simultaneous measurements of dilatometric shrinkage and electrical conductance has been developed for assessing the deposit forming propensity of coal ashes. The measurements are based on a sintering model which stipulates that the formation of particle-to-particle bonding leads to enhanced conductance and increased density of ash test samples and boiler deposits. 4. There are some coal ashes, rich in sodium which do not behave as predicted from sintering models. With these ashes the sinterpoint temperature defined by the electrical conductance measurements can be over 250 K lower than that indicated by the results of conventional ash fusion tests. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The work was carried out at the Central Electricity Research Laboratories and the paper is published by permission of the Central Electricity Generating Board. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. REFERENCES ASTM, Fusibility of Coal and Coke Ash, D1857-68 (1968). R. C. Attig and D. H. Barnhardt, "A Laboratory Method of Evaluating Factors Affecting Tube Bank Fouling in Coal-Fired Boilers," Proceed. Int. Conf., Mechanism of Corrosion by Fuel Impurities, Marchwood, England, 1968, Butterworths Publ. p. 183. R. E. Boni and G. Derge, "Surface Structure of Non-Oxidizing Slags Containing Sulphur," Trans. AIME, Journ. Metals, p. 59 (1956). J. Boow, "Sodium and Ash Reactions in the Formation of Fireside Deposits in Pulverized Fuel Fired Boilers," Fuel, 51, 170 (1972). British Standard, "The Analysis and Testing of Coal and Coke, BS Method 1016, Part 15 - Fusibility of Coal and Coke Ash," Brit. Stand. Inst., London (1970). J. w. Cumming: "Communication: The Electrical Resistance of Coal Ash at Elevated Temperatures, Journ. Inst. Energy, 53, 153 (1980). DIN, "Determination of Ash Fusion Behavior," German Standard, DIN 51730 (1976). J. J. Frenkel, "Viscous Flow of Crystalline Bodies Under the Action of Surface Tension," Journ. Phys. (MOSCOW) 2, 385 (1945). 151

It has been recognized by many researchers th<strong>at</strong> although ash fusion tests can<br />

given useful inform<strong>at</strong>ion regarding <strong>the</strong> fouling and slagging propensities <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> ashes,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are serious shortcomings. First, <strong>the</strong> tests are based on subjective observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

and not precise scientific measurements, and <strong>the</strong>y have a large margin <strong>of</strong> error. For<br />

example, <strong>the</strong> ASTM-method which is widely used in many countries allows for a 55 K<br />

margin <strong>of</strong> reproducibility in <strong>the</strong> initial deform<strong>at</strong>ion, s<strong>of</strong>tening hemisphere temper<strong>at</strong>ures<br />

in an oxidizing <strong>at</strong>mosphere, and a 70 K margin <strong>of</strong> uncertainty in determining <strong>the</strong> initial<br />

deform<strong>at</strong>ion temper<strong>at</strong>ure in a reducing <strong>at</strong>mosphere.<br />

Within th<strong>at</strong> 70 K margin <strong>the</strong> viscosity<br />

can change by an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude and consequently <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> ash sintering will<br />

change by <strong>the</strong> same factor.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r, more serious, shortcoming with <strong>the</strong> ash fusion method is th<strong>at</strong> when testing<br />

some <strong>coal</strong> ashes <strong>the</strong>re occurs an extensive degree <strong>of</strong> particle-to-particle bonding without<br />

any visible sign <strong>of</strong> deform<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> an ash pellet. It is, <strong>the</strong>refore, evident<br />

th<strong>at</strong> an additional method is needed to assess <strong>the</strong> sintering characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

ashes. A choice <strong>of</strong> sinter measuring techniques is given in Table 2.<br />

TABLE 2. REVIEW OF ASH SINTERING TECHNIQUES<br />

Measuring Technique Equipment<br />

Neck-growth measurements between A furnace and a<br />

spherical particles (Kuczynski, microscope<br />

1949), Raask, 1973)<br />

Simultaneous shrinkage and<br />

electrical conductance<br />

measurements (Raask, 1979)<br />

Needs a purpose-built<br />

furnace assembly for<br />

more accur<strong>at</strong>e measure-<br />

ments. A simpler<br />

version uses pl<strong>at</strong>inum<br />

wire electrodes as<br />

described by Raask<br />

(1979) and by Cumming<br />

(1980)<br />

Crushing strength measure-<br />

A furnace and a<br />

ments <strong>of</strong> sintered ash<br />

crushing strength<br />

pellets (Atting and<br />

Barnhard, 1963; Gibb, 1981)<br />

measuring device<br />

Ash agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion by<br />

sieving test (Stallman<br />

and Neavel (1980)<br />

Ash plug flow method<br />

A furnace and a<br />

sieving machine<br />

A tubular furnace tube<br />

with perfor<strong>at</strong>ed pl<strong>at</strong>e<br />

to support an ash plug<br />

Comments<br />

~<br />

This is suitable for<br />

homogeneous m<strong>at</strong>erial when<br />

available in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong><br />

spherical particles. It is<br />

not suitable for routine<br />

sinter testing <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> ashes.<br />

Each ash could be provided with<br />

sintering r<strong>at</strong>e curves. The<br />

method needs to be tested and<br />

assessed by different<br />

researchers,<br />

The method has been used by<br />

several researchers but <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is no agreed procedure<br />

This is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> simplest<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> testing for<br />

initial sintering, and it<br />

warrants more system<strong>at</strong>ic<br />

tests<br />

So far no experimental results<br />

have been found in<br />

1 i ter<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

The brief review in Table 2 shows th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are several labor<strong>at</strong>ory methods <strong>of</strong><br />

sinter testing <strong>coal</strong> ashes, which can give some useful inform<strong>at</strong>ion regarding <strong>the</strong>ir deposit<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!