25.04.2013 Views

the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...

the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...

the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sintering by viscous flow is <strong>the</strong> principal mechanism for <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> deposits<br />

in <strong>coal</strong> fired boile s and t e r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sintering <strong>of</strong> different size particles for a<br />

given viscosity (10 6 N s m- 9 ) can be seen in Fig. 1 where <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> x/r is plotted<br />

against time on a logarithmic scale. The surface tension <strong>of</strong> fused ash was taken to<br />

be 0.32 N rn-l as measured previously by Raask (1966). Fig. 2 shows plots where <strong>the</strong><br />

r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> x/r represents <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> sintering <strong>of</strong> 5 vm radius particles having different<br />

viscosities. Table 1 lists four arbitrary stages <strong>of</strong> sintering <strong>of</strong> ash deposit on boiler<br />

tubes from <strong>the</strong> initial contact between <strong>the</strong> ash particles to <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> fused slag<br />

where <strong>the</strong> shapes <strong>of</strong> initial constituent particles are no longer distinguishable.<br />

Table 1. Degree <strong>of</strong> Sintering Based on <strong>the</strong> R<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> Neck Bond<br />

Radius to Particle Radius (+)<br />

R<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> x/r Degress <strong>of</strong> Sintering Comment<br />

0.001 Onset <strong>of</strong> sintering Deposit <strong>of</strong> this degree <strong>of</strong> sintering on<br />

boiler tubes would not have significant<br />

cohesive strength and would probably fall<br />

<strong>of</strong>f under <strong>the</strong> action <strong>of</strong> gravity and boiler<br />

vi br<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

Al.3<br />

Slightly sintered The deposit on boiler tubes would probably<br />

m<strong>at</strong>rix be removed by soot blowing.<br />

Strongly sintered The deposit on boiler tubes would be<br />

deposit difficult to remove by soot blowing.<br />

Slagging The ash particles lose <strong>the</strong>ir original<br />

identity and <strong>the</strong> deposit on boiler tubes<br />

cannot be removed by soot blowing.<br />

Rapid form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> sintered boiler deposits and slags is usually explained by <strong>the</strong><br />

presence <strong>of</strong> a liquid phase or molten surface layer on ash particles. In high temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

glass and slag technology (blas furnace slag), a liquid phase is considered to have a<br />

viscosity value below 10 N s m- 5 . The plots in Fig. 1 and 2 show th<strong>at</strong> with small particles<br />

it is not necessary to evoke <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a liquid phase for a rapid sintering. For<br />

example, particles 0.1 m in diameter would require about 10 m i l l i econds o form a<br />

substantial sinter bond, when <strong>the</strong> viscosity has a high value <strong>of</strong> 10 3 N s m-'. With <strong>the</strong><br />

same viscosity 10 pm particles would require about 10 seconds to achieve <strong>the</strong> same degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> bonding.<br />

The two parameters which govern <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sintering, namely <strong>the</strong> surface tension<br />

and <strong>the</strong> viscosity, both decrease with temper<strong>at</strong>ure as shown in Fig. 3. The temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> surface tension is small (Curve A) and it is approxim<strong>at</strong>ely proportional<br />

to <strong>the</strong> inverse <strong>of</strong> square root <strong>of</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure as discussed by Boni and Derge (1956)<br />

whereas <strong>the</strong> viscosity changes exponentially with temper<strong>at</strong>ure as shown by Curve B.<br />

is <strong>the</strong>refore evident th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sintering will show an inverse rel<strong>at</strong>ionship with<br />

<strong>the</strong> viscosity and w i l l increase exponentially with temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

PARTICLE-TO-PARTICLE NECK GROWTH MEASUREMENTS<br />

The model for <strong>coal</strong> ash sintering discussed in <strong>the</strong> previous section is based on <strong>the</strong><br />

viscous deform<strong>at</strong>ion and flow <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> contact points between spherical particles. It<br />

would, <strong>the</strong>refore, be logical to consider determining <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sintering by a technique<br />

where <strong>the</strong> measurements are based directly on Frenkel 's equ<strong>at</strong>ion. Kuczynski (1949) has<br />

146<br />

It<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!