the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...

the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ... the coking properties of coal at elevated pressures. - Argonne ...

25.04.2013 Views

I / The Coking Properties of Coal at Elevated Pressures Michael 5. Lancet Frank A. Sim George P. Curran Conoco Coal Development Company Research Division Library, PA 15129 I NTKODUCTION Conoco‘s experience with the gasification of Pittsburgh No. 8 and Ohio No. 9 coals in Westfield, Scotland has suggested that the coking properties of these coals, and other Eastern U.S. coals by inference, under increased pressure are different from those normally measured at one atmosphere. Convinced that the initial coal-based commercial synfuels plants in the U.S. will be gasification plants, Conoco has invested in the equipment necessary to carry out this study. The work reported herein involves thc operation of a pressurized coker, a pressurized Gieseler Plastometer and a device for measuring the Pressurized Swelling Index (PSI). The results of testing various coals by these methods are particularly useful in the evaluation of said coals for use in both dry and wet bottomed Lurgi gasifiers. Seven coals, covering a fairly wide range of ranks and characteristics, were included in this work. These included thrce Eastern U.S. bituminous coals, EPHI-Champion and Westland from the Pittsburgh No. 8 seam and Noble County from the Ohio No. 9 seam. Also included were an Illinois No. 6 bituminous coal, Burning Star, a Western U.S. subbituminous coal, Upper Hiawatha, from Utah, and two bituminous coals, Frances and Rossington from the U.K. Four of these coals, EPRI-Champion, Noble County, Frances and Rossington were actually run in the BGC/Lurgi slagging gasifier during various programs in Westfield, Scotland. EXPERIMENTAL Drum sized samples of each coal were prepared for testing by the flow sheet shown in Figure 1. All samples were stored in sealed plastic bags until ground finer than 1/4” after which time they were saved in a COO atmosphere in a dry ice chest. The parting material or gob from each coal sample was saved and sized as needed for each test where gob addition was called for. Several of the samples, as received, contained no gob, hence waste material from another mine in the same seam or, if that was not available, parting material from a similar coal sample was used. The following gob was used with each coal as listed below: - Coal EPRI Westland Noble County Burning Star Frances Rossington Upper Hiawatha, 1 - Gob We st land West land Egypt Valley - Ohio No. 9 Hillsboro - Illinois No. 6 None Hill sboro Upper Hiawatha

I<br />

/<br />

The Coking Properties <strong>of</strong> Coal <strong>at</strong> Elev<strong>at</strong>ed Pressures<br />

Michael 5. Lancet<br />

Frank A. Sim<br />

George P. Curran<br />

Conoco Coal Development Company<br />

Research Division<br />

Library, PA 15129<br />

I NTKODUCTION<br />

Conoco‘s experience with <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh No. 8 and Ohio<br />

No. 9 <strong>coal</strong>s in Westfield, Scotland has suggested th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coking</strong> <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se <strong>coal</strong>s, and o<strong>the</strong>r Eastern U.S. <strong>coal</strong>s by inference, under increased pressure<br />

are different from those normally measured <strong>at</strong> one <strong>at</strong>mosphere.<br />

Convinced th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> initial <strong>coal</strong>-based commercial synfuels plants in<br />

<strong>the</strong> U.S. will be gasific<strong>at</strong>ion plants, Conoco has invested in <strong>the</strong> equipment<br />

necessary to carry out this study.<br />

The work reported herein involves thc oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a pressurized coker,<br />

a pressurized Gieseler Plastometer and a device for measuring <strong>the</strong> Pressurized<br />

Swelling Index (PSI). The results <strong>of</strong> testing various <strong>coal</strong>s by <strong>the</strong>se methods are<br />

particularly useful in <strong>the</strong> evalu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> said <strong>coal</strong>s for use in both dry and wet<br />

bottomed Lurgi gasifiers.<br />

Seven <strong>coal</strong>s, covering a fairly wide range <strong>of</strong> ranks and characteristics,<br />

were included in this work. These included thrce Eastern U.S. bituminous<br />

<strong>coal</strong>s, EPHI-Champion and Westland from <strong>the</strong> Pittsburgh No. 8 seam and Noble County<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Ohio No. 9 seam. Also included were an Illinois No. 6 bituminous <strong>coal</strong>,<br />

Burning Star, a Western U.S. subbituminous <strong>coal</strong>, Upper Hiaw<strong>at</strong>ha, from Utah, and<br />

two bituminous <strong>coal</strong>s, Frances and Rossington from <strong>the</strong> U.K. Four <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>coal</strong>s,<br />

EPRI-Champion, Noble County, Frances and Rossington were actually run in <strong>the</strong><br />

BGC/Lurgi slagging gasifier during various programs in Westfield, Scotland.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

Drum sized samples <strong>of</strong> each <strong>coal</strong> were prepared for testing by <strong>the</strong> flow<br />

sheet shown in Figure 1. All samples were stored in sealed plastic bags until<br />

ground finer than 1/4” after which time <strong>the</strong>y were saved in a COO <strong>at</strong>mosphere in a<br />

dry ice chest.<br />

The parting m<strong>at</strong>erial or gob from each <strong>coal</strong> sample was saved and sized<br />

as needed for each test where gob addition was called for. Several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

samples, as received, contained no gob, hence waste m<strong>at</strong>erial from ano<strong>the</strong>r mine<br />

in <strong>the</strong> same seam or, if th<strong>at</strong> was not available, parting m<strong>at</strong>erial from a similar<br />

<strong>coal</strong> sample was used. The following gob was used with each <strong>coal</strong> as listed<br />

below:<br />

-<br />

Coal<br />

EPRI<br />

Westland<br />

Noble County<br />

Burning Star<br />

Frances<br />

Rossington<br />

Upper Hiaw<strong>at</strong>ha,<br />

1<br />

-<br />

Gob<br />

We st land<br />

West land<br />

Egypt Valley - Ohio No. 9<br />

Hillsboro - Illinois No. 6<br />

None<br />

Hill sboro<br />

Upper Hiaw<strong>at</strong>ha


The proxitn<strong>at</strong>e and ultim<strong>at</strong>e analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se Coals are given in Table 1.<br />

Also shown in this table are <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ing values, ASTM Gieseler fluidity and Free<br />

Swelling Index (FSI), <strong>the</strong> Hardgrove grindability and a strength index for each<br />

<strong>coal</strong>. These represent <strong>the</strong> normally measured physical and chemical <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>coal</strong>.<br />

The Gieseler fluidity in DDPhl and <strong>the</strong> Free Swelling Index (FSI)<br />

reported in Table 1 are <strong>the</strong> standard ASl'hl test values for each <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

The rel<strong>at</strong>ive strength <strong>of</strong> eacli <strong>coal</strong> was determined by <strong>the</strong> CCDC mini<br />

drum method which consists <strong>of</strong> tumbling 3 10 g sample in a specially designed 8"<br />

diameter tumbler with two lYOo opposed internal vanes. A composite mini drum<br />

index was calcul<strong>at</strong>ed for each <strong>coal</strong> which can be used to compare <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

strengths or <strong>coal</strong>s and/or cokes. The higher <strong>the</strong> number <strong>the</strong> stronger <strong>the</strong> m<strong>at</strong>erial.<br />

The same test was used to measure <strong>the</strong> strengths <strong>of</strong> all cokes produced in <strong>the</strong><br />

pressure coker runs described l<strong>at</strong>er.<br />

The <strong>coal</strong> strengths, ranging from a low <strong>of</strong> 0.81 for <strong>the</strong> Noble County<br />

<strong>coal</strong> to 0.94 for <strong>the</strong> Frances, are quite high. In almost every case <strong>the</strong> strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> each <strong>coal</strong> is gre<strong>at</strong>er than th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cokes derived from <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

The grindability numbers are consistent with <strong>the</strong> strength indices with<br />

Frances <strong>at</strong> 38.6 beiJlg thc hardest to grind and <strong>the</strong> strongest from a strength indcx<br />

standpoint. Based on <strong>the</strong> grindability all Lhe <strong>coal</strong>s are physically rugged and<br />

should pose no problems upon feeding to a Lurgi gasifier.<br />

Pressurized Coal Fluidity Studies<br />

The measurcment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidity or <strong>coal</strong>s as <strong>the</strong>y are he<strong>at</strong>ed through<br />

350 to 500"~ has bcen uf signiiicant benciit to <strong>the</strong> steel industry in predicting<br />

<strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> various <strong>coal</strong>s in slot ovcns. The standard method <strong>of</strong> determin-<br />

I ng <strong>coal</strong> fluidity is via <strong>the</strong> Gieseler plastomcLcr. This tesl, normally carried<br />

out <strong>at</strong> 1 <strong>at</strong>ni total pressure in air, consists <strong>of</strong> applying a constant torque to a<br />

rabble arm stirrer, packed in a sample <strong>of</strong> finely ground <strong>coal</strong>, and measuring <strong>the</strong><br />

r<strong>at</strong>e ol' rot<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stirrer as <strong>the</strong> sample is he<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> a constant r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

(usually 3°C/tnin) through <strong>the</strong> plastic zone.<br />

In general, <strong>coal</strong>s <strong>of</strong> higher rank (except anthracite) are found to be<br />

more fluid by this test than those <strong>of</strong> lower rank. Little is known, however,<br />

about <strong>the</strong> fluidity <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s <strong>at</strong> elev<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>pressures</strong> and in gas <strong>at</strong>mospheres o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than air. ( ' 1 ') This becomes <strong>of</strong> particular interest for moving bed <strong>coal</strong> gasifiers<br />

where raw <strong>coal</strong> is introduced <strong>at</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r high temper<strong>at</strong>ures and <strong>at</strong> elev<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>pressures</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> reducing gas. Hence, <strong>the</strong> work described herein was aimed <strong>at</strong> determining <strong>the</strong><br />

effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se varlables, as well as higher he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>es, on <strong>the</strong> fluidities <strong>of</strong><br />

different <strong>coal</strong>s. Table 2 lists <strong>the</strong> parameters tested in this work.<br />

Appar<strong>at</strong>us:<br />

The basic equipment used in this work has been described previously.(')<br />

Uoth <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e and <strong>the</strong> torque are continuously variable on this machine<br />

between <strong>the</strong> values <strong>of</strong> 0 and 6°C/minute and 0 and 720 g.cm, respectively. The<br />

variable he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e permits examin<strong>at</strong>ion 01 <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> this parameter on<br />

<strong>coal</strong> fluidity whereas normal Gieseler oper<strong>at</strong>ion is <strong>at</strong> a fixed he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

3'C/minute. The capability <strong>of</strong> lowering <strong>the</strong> torque below <strong>the</strong> standard value <strong>of</strong><br />

100 g.cm permits measurement <strong>of</strong> fluidities far in excess <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> normal 30,000<br />

DDPhl maximum.<br />

2


Procedure :<br />

Hand picked lunips <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> were ground in air Lo -35 mesh and ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

tested inmedi<strong>at</strong>ely or stored in a C02 <strong>at</strong>mosphere in a dry-ice chest. Coal<br />

samples Of this kind are identified in this report as "clean <strong>coal</strong>". When<br />

specified by <strong>the</strong> program, "clean" <strong>coal</strong> samples were doped with gob ground to -35<br />

mesh. Frances <strong>coal</strong> was not doped due to <strong>the</strong> clean n<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> this seam. Tar was<br />

added to <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and gob mixture as a solution in toluene. The <strong>coal</strong>-gob-tar<br />

slurry was <strong>the</strong>n placed in a vacuum oven and <strong>the</strong> toluene was evapor<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> about 5OOC.<br />

i\ modified ASThl D-2639-71. "Standard hlethod <strong>of</strong> Test for Plastic<br />

Properties <strong>of</strong> Coal by <strong>the</strong> Constant-Torquc Giescler Plastometer" was employed.<br />

As opposed to <strong>the</strong> ASThl standard method, thc inajority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> runs in this study<br />

were done <strong>at</strong> a he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> G°C/minute and only one for each <strong>coal</strong> was made <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> standard r<strong>at</strong>c <strong>of</strong> 3VC/niinute. Also, thc standard torque <strong>of</strong> 1.40 oz-in<br />

(100 gm-cm) was used only when <strong>the</strong> ~naximum fluidity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> in question was<br />

within <strong>the</strong> rangc <strong>of</strong> Llie appar<strong>at</strong>us, i.e., 0-28,000 DDmI. In <strong>the</strong> cases where <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>coal</strong> fluidity exceeded <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing range <strong>of</strong> t tic instrument, "low" torques, i.e.,<br />

0.45 oz-inch (32.4 g-cm) or 0.26 oz-inch (18.7 g-end, were employed and <strong>the</strong><br />

results were corrected by factors <strong>of</strong> 3.1 or 5.4, which are <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>ios <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

standard torque and Lhe lower torques, (1.4/0.45 and 1.4/0.26), respectively. A<br />

considerable degree <strong>of</strong> uncertainty may be associ<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> numerical value <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> high torque/low torque correction factor. The actual r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> torques<br />

is <strong>the</strong>oretically correct for Newtonian fluids. llowever, since each <strong>coal</strong> in its<br />

plastic st<strong>at</strong>e limy devi<strong>at</strong>e from Newtonian behavior to a different degree, <strong>the</strong><br />

values <strong>of</strong> 3.1. or 5.4 may only be considered to be approxim<strong>at</strong>ions to <strong>the</strong> true<br />

values.<br />

When <strong>the</strong> Lest was to be performed in a gas mixture containing 18 or<br />

31.5 vol 4 H2 <strong>at</strong> a total pressure <strong>of</strong> 350 psig, <strong>the</strong> pressure vessel containing <strong>the</strong><br />

plastometer was evacu<strong>at</strong>ed and <strong>the</strong>n pressurlzed with hydrogen to 51 psig and 100<br />

~psig, respectively. The hydrogen was <strong>the</strong>n diluted to <strong>the</strong> desired degree by<br />

pressurizing <strong>the</strong> vessel up to 350 psig with prepurificd nitrogen. The remainder<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> runs were carried out in a prepurified nitrogen <strong>at</strong>mosphere or in air.<br />

Results aiid Discussion:<br />

Tables 3 through (; show <strong>the</strong> cflccts OC <strong>the</strong> studied variables, i.e.,<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lienling r<strong>at</strong>e, cas composition, gob content, tar content, and nitrogen<br />

pressure, on <strong>the</strong> fluidity 01 <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s studied. Figures 2 through 6 are<br />

grnphical represent<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a obtained 011 <strong>the</strong> fluidities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> seven<br />

<strong>coal</strong>s iti this program.<br />

The following conclusions may be drawn from <strong>the</strong>se d<strong>at</strong>a:<br />

1. In all cases, an increase in <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e resulted in<br />

substantially increased fluidity (Figures 2 and 3). This effect<br />

is directly comparable to and in complete agreement with th<strong>at</strong><br />

observed by Van Krevelen, et.al. (3)<br />

2. In all cases, except th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> Frances and Upper Hiaw<strong>at</strong>ha <strong>coal</strong>s, <strong>the</strong><br />

fluidity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> is moder<strong>at</strong>ely sensitive to hydrogen partial<br />

3


pressure <strong>at</strong> 350 psig total pressure (Figure I). The effects <strong>of</strong> all<br />

<strong>the</strong> variables - except <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e - on <strong>the</strong> fluidity <strong>of</strong> Frances<br />

and Upper Hiaw<strong>at</strong>ha <strong>coal</strong> is so small th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>coal</strong>s may be considered<br />

non- fluid.<br />

3. The observed effect <strong>of</strong> an increase i.n fluidity with an increase in<br />

total, or nitrogen pressure, Table 6, is consistent with work done<br />

previously on o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>coal</strong>s("2) in this pressure range.<br />

4, Increasing <strong>the</strong> gob content in all <strong>coal</strong>s reduced <strong>the</strong> fluidity in all<br />

cases. Frances <strong>coal</strong> was not subject to this type <strong>of</strong> test.<br />

5. The addition <strong>of</strong> 4 wt % <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh No. 8 derived tar significantly<br />

increased <strong>the</strong> fluidity <strong>of</strong> all <strong>coal</strong>s except <strong>the</strong> Frances and Upper<br />

Hiaw<strong>at</strong>ha.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> this work on <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> both tot.al pressure and<br />

liydrogen partial pressure, qualit<strong>at</strong>ively support <strong>the</strong> conclusion <strong>of</strong> Lewellen, (I)<br />

however, <strong>the</strong> available d<strong>at</strong>a are insufficient to quantit<strong>at</strong>ively test this model.<br />

To fully test this model would require a much wider range <strong>of</strong> both <strong>pressures</strong><br />

(10-2-10t3 <strong>at</strong>m) and he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>es (up to 104'C/min) than is currently possible.<br />

The qualit<strong>at</strong>ive correl<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidity with <strong>the</strong> experimental<br />

parameters, as discussed above, suggest th<strong>at</strong> with additional d<strong>at</strong>a, especially<br />

from work on o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>coal</strong>s, a meaningful predictive correl<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se d<strong>at</strong>a may<br />

eventually be possible. Initial <strong>at</strong>tempts to correl<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> observed fluidity<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a with various physical and chemical <strong>properties</strong> have been encouraging. There<br />

is strong evidence which suggests th<strong>at</strong> with d<strong>at</strong>a from several additional <strong>coal</strong>s a<br />

correl<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> fluidity with various petrographic fe<strong>at</strong>ures may be obtained.<br />

Pressurized Swelling Index<br />

'The free swelling index, FSI, <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> as defined by <strong>the</strong> AS'I'h!(5) is<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r valunble tool <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> steel industry. 'I'Iiis Lest consists <strong>of</strong> rapidly<br />

he<strong>at</strong>ing a finely ground <strong>coal</strong> sample to about 800'C and observing <strong>the</strong> degree to<br />

which <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> cakes and swells. This test, as in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> standard Gieseler<br />

work, is carried out <strong>at</strong> one <strong>at</strong>mosphere in air. The values for <strong>the</strong> ASTM FS1.s<br />

for each <strong>coal</strong> are given in Table 1. For <strong>the</strong> present work it was believed th<strong>at</strong> a<br />

similar test under simul<strong>at</strong>ed gasifier conditions might be <strong>of</strong> value in predicting<br />

<strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s as fed to a moving bed gasifier.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> pressurized swelling tests carried out in this work are as<br />

close to <strong>the</strong> ASThl standard method as possible, one major difference was unavoidable.<br />

Due to <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> elev<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>pressures</strong> <strong>the</strong> healing r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> this test is not <strong>the</strong><br />

same as ch<strong>at</strong> prescribed by <strong>the</strong> ASTM standard Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>at</strong> each test condition was slightly different due to <strong>the</strong> difference in<br />

pressure and <strong>the</strong>rmal conductivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gases used. The he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e was,<br />

however. <strong>the</strong> same for each <strong>coal</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> same tesL condition and conclusions drawn<br />

from such comparisons should be valid. 111 general <strong>the</strong> coke buttons produced in<br />

<strong>the</strong> CCDC pressurized swelling index (PSI) test are significantly less voluminous<br />

than those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ASTM test.


Appar<strong>at</strong>us:<br />

The equipment for this test, as shown schem<strong>at</strong>ically in Figure 7,<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> an electrically he<strong>at</strong>ed steel core enclosed in a pressure shell. A<br />

sample crucible holder assembly is <strong>at</strong>tached to a 1/4" lifting rod which passes<br />

through a packing gland <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vessel. Str<strong>at</strong>egically loc<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmocouples permit continuous monitoring <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> core and crucible t.emper<strong>at</strong>urc.<br />

Procedure:<br />

A 1.00 gm sample <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>, ground to -60 mesh, was placed in <strong>the</strong> test<br />

crucible, covered with a lid and positioned in <strong>the</strong> holder. The vessel was <strong>the</strong>n<br />

closed, sealed and evacu<strong>at</strong>ed in order to displace air and <strong>the</strong>n flooded or<br />

pressurized with <strong>the</strong> desired gas. After <strong>the</strong> required pressure was <strong>at</strong>tained, <strong>the</strong><br />

lifting rod with <strong>the</strong> holder and <strong>the</strong> crucible was pushed down onto <strong>the</strong> core<br />

surface which had previously bccn equilibr<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> 1500° 5OF. Temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Corc were recorded every 20 seconds beginning with <strong>the</strong> time when <strong>the</strong> crucible<br />

reached <strong>the</strong> core. The crucible was lifted after 5 minutes, <strong>the</strong> appar<strong>at</strong>us was<br />

depressurized, purged with nitrogen and <strong>the</strong> crucible was removed. The coke<br />

hutton was carefully taken from Ihe crucible and weighed. The pores in <strong>the</strong><br />

button were plugged by dipping i n molten paraffin and <strong>the</strong> volume was measured by<br />

w<strong>at</strong>er displacement. The swelling index was defined as <strong>the</strong> button volume in<br />

milliliters. For comparison purposes, <strong>the</strong> ASTM FSI pr<strong>of</strong>ile number is very nearly<br />

<strong>the</strong> button volume in ml. Each experiment was repe<strong>at</strong>ed 4 to 5 times due to <strong>the</strong><br />

variability in <strong>the</strong> hutton volume, and <strong>the</strong> value reported for each is <strong>the</strong> average<br />

<strong>of</strong> all runs. Normally <strong>the</strong> standard devi<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> this average was less than f lo$.<br />

Temper<strong>at</strong>ure pr<strong>of</strong>iles were measured in order to ascertain th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

samples were subJect to comparable he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>es. The initial he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>es are<br />

quite high (1000-1200°F/min) and <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure stabilizes after 3 minutes. The<br />

he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e in both hydrogen and nitrogen is nearly <strong>the</strong> same.<br />

Expe r iment a 1 Re su 1 t s :<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> seven <strong>coal</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> program was tested by this method. Tar<br />

obtained during oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Westfield gasifier with Pittsburgh No. 8 <strong>coal</strong><br />

was used for <strong>the</strong> tar addition experiments with all tested <strong>coal</strong>s.<br />

The <strong>coal</strong>s and <strong>the</strong>ir mixtures with gob and tar were tested <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

conditions shown in Table 7.<br />

Table 8 shows <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample composition on <strong>the</strong> swelling <strong>of</strong><br />

different <strong>coal</strong>s <strong>at</strong> 365 psia total and 115 psia hydrogen partial pressure.<br />

Figure 8 is a graphical represent<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se results.<br />

The experimental results lead to <strong>the</strong> following conclusions:<br />

1. There is little difference between <strong>the</strong> swelling <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Noble County, Ohio NO. 9 <strong>coal</strong> and <strong>the</strong> two Pittsburgh seam <strong>coal</strong>s,<br />

EPRI-Champion and \Vestland, <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> test conditions, i.e., <strong>at</strong><br />

1500' j: 5"F, 350 psig total pressure and 115 psia hydrogen partial<br />

pressure. 'This is in marlicd ContrasL to <strong>the</strong> 1 <strong>at</strong>m ASTU FSI d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

(Table 1) where <strong>the</strong> two Pittsburgh Seam <strong>coal</strong>s have FSI values <strong>of</strong> 7<br />

5


while <strong>the</strong> Ohio No. 9 has an FSI <strong>of</strong> only 4! The Burning Star-<br />

Illinois No. F coke buttons and those made <strong>of</strong> Rossington <strong>coal</strong> wcre<br />

considerably less voluminous lhan those ol <strong>the</strong> EPitI <strong>coal</strong>. Frances<br />

and Upper Hiaw<strong>at</strong>ha <strong>coal</strong>s are virtually non swelling.<br />

With <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Noble County <strong>coal</strong>, thc order <strong>of</strong> tlle<br />

pressurized swelling index values is <strong>the</strong> same as th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AS111<br />

FSI values. Thc apparent gre<strong>at</strong>er effect 01 gasifier condi1.ions on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Ohio No. 9 <strong>coal</strong> than on <strong>the</strong> Pittshurgh No. E <strong>coal</strong>s may help<br />

explain some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unexpected oper<strong>at</strong>ing difficulties which occurred<br />

when thc Noble County <strong>coal</strong> was fed to <strong>the</strong> I3GC/Lurgi Slagging gasifier<br />

in <strong>the</strong> DOE sponsorcd Westfield trials. The observed differcnccs in<br />

<strong>the</strong> caking and swelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ohio No. 9 <strong>coal</strong> <strong>at</strong> Westfield versus<br />

those predicted by standard ASThl tests was one key factor which<br />

eventually led to <strong>the</strong> present CCDC feedstock evalu<strong>at</strong>ion program.<br />

It is interesting th<strong>at</strong> increased hydrogen pressurc and 1.oL:il<br />

pressure has a larger rel<strong>at</strong>ive effect on Lhc swelling <strong>of</strong> thc Noblc<br />

County <strong>coal</strong> than on its fluidity. The increase in <strong>the</strong> fluidity <strong>of</strong><br />

this <strong>coal</strong> is increased by gasifier conditions by about <strong>the</strong> sanic<br />

factor as are <strong>the</strong> two Pittsburgh seam <strong>coal</strong>s.<br />

2. Doping with gob significantly reduces <strong>the</strong> swclling <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s<br />

tested except <strong>the</strong> inactive Uppcr Hiaw<strong>at</strong>hn <strong>coal</strong> where <strong>the</strong> gob<br />

addition had no effect. This observcd effect is essentially th<strong>at</strong><br />

expected from <strong>the</strong> dilrtcnl clfcct <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inert gob.<br />

3. The addition <strong>of</strong> tar to <strong>the</strong> bituminous <strong>coal</strong>s when <strong>the</strong>y have been<br />

doped with 10 wt $ gob, considerably increascs <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> coke<br />

buttons made <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>coal</strong>s (Table 9). Tar addition to <strong>the</strong> Utah<br />

subbituminous <strong>coal</strong> does not have any effect, while <strong>the</strong> same tar<br />

addition to Frances <strong>coal</strong> increases its very low swelling activity<br />

by about 10%.<br />

4.<br />

The addition <strong>of</strong> even 4% tar has little effect on <strong>the</strong> Noble County<br />

<strong>coal</strong> (Table 9). This, coupled with <strong>the</strong> much larger observed effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>at</strong> gasifier conditions discussed above, sugges1.s th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>-derived tar content <strong>of</strong> this <strong>coal</strong> may be significantly<br />

higher than th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> thc o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>coal</strong>s. This, however, is not confirmed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> coker yield d<strong>at</strong>a to be discusscd l<strong>at</strong>er. It is possible th<strong>at</strong><br />

such differences in <strong>the</strong> yicld structure would he masked by reactions<br />

between <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>-derived tar and added hydrogen or even pyrolysisderived<br />

gases. hlorc <strong>coal</strong>-derived tar from <strong>the</strong> Noble County <strong>coal</strong><br />

Could also explain <strong>the</strong> observ<strong>at</strong>ion th3L this <strong>coal</strong> has Lhe highest<br />

AS'TM Gieseler fluidity 01' any <strong>coal</strong> testea (Table 1).<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> hydrogen partial pressure on <strong>the</strong> swelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

tested, doped with 10% gob, is negligible. There was little<br />

difference between <strong>the</strong> buttons produced in 1005 N~ <strong>at</strong> 350 psig and<br />

those in 31.5% H2-68.5$ N, <strong>at</strong> 350 psig total pressure. The<br />

use <strong>of</strong> a gas containing 18 V O ~<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coke buttons <strong>of</strong> EPRI cool containing 10% gob. effect <strong>of</strong><br />

6<br />

% H~ also did not affect <strong>the</strong> volumes


<strong>the</strong> total pressure on <strong>the</strong> swelling <strong>properties</strong> was studied only with<br />

EPRI <strong>coal</strong> doped with 10% gob. Prepurified nitrogen was used and<br />

<strong>the</strong> results suggest <strong>the</strong>re is little or no effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total<br />

pressure on <strong>the</strong> swelling <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> this <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> both hydrogcn prcssurc and total pressure on <strong>the</strong><br />

button Volume is small <strong>the</strong>y have a marked effcct on <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coke<br />

buttons. Coking a highly caking Eastern U.S. <strong>coal</strong> in <strong>the</strong> pressurized FSI<br />

appar<strong>at</strong>us produces, <strong>at</strong> low pressure, a button with a smooth rounded top surface.<br />

At <strong>pressures</strong> above about 150 psig, however, one or more appendages which resemble<br />

stalagmites begin to appear on thc top surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> button.<br />

This effect is not observed when lower rank <strong>coal</strong>s are processed in <strong>the</strong><br />

dcvice. Figure 9 shows a comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cffcct <strong>of</strong> prcssure on <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> buttons produced from a typical Pittshurgh No. 8 seam <strong>coal</strong> with those<br />

produccd from a less ncl.ive, Illinois Basin, <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

Apparently thc pressure tends to prcvent <strong>the</strong> whole top surface from<br />

rising as seems to be <strong>the</strong> case <strong>at</strong> <strong>at</strong>mospheric pressure, but internal <strong>pressures</strong><br />

are built up which are eventually releascd through <strong>the</strong> observed stalagmite<br />

growth.<br />

A s discussed earlicr, <strong>the</strong>re is encouraging evidence th<strong>at</strong> more d<strong>at</strong>a on<br />

<strong>the</strong>se <strong>properties</strong>, to be obtained by running more <strong>coal</strong>s through <strong>the</strong> program, will<br />

lead to a predictive correl<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> swelling <strong>properties</strong> based upon petrographic<br />

parameters.<br />

Pressurized Coker Studies<br />

Thc CCDC pressurized coker is a uscful tool for testing several<br />

parameters which are associ<strong>at</strong>ed with coke form<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> a Lurgi<br />

gasifier. Especially important in this respect is <strong>the</strong> friability which may be a<br />

key to successful stirrer design in future plants. This property is studied via<br />

<strong>the</strong> mini drum tumbler test described earlier. O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>coking</strong> <strong>properties</strong> which are<br />

studied are <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> washing, i.e., thc effect <strong>of</strong> non-<strong>coal</strong> impurities, on<br />

<strong>the</strong> coke formed undcr pressure and <strong>the</strong> effcct <strong>of</strong> recycle tar addition on coke<br />

form<strong>at</strong>ion. An understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se cffects will be important for gasifier and<br />

<strong>coal</strong> prcpar<strong>at</strong>ion facilities design requirements.<br />

All <strong>coal</strong>s included in this program were subjected to testing in <strong>the</strong><br />

pressurizcd coker systcm to ascertain tlic cffects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total oper<strong>at</strong>ing pressure,<br />

<strong>the</strong> hydrogen partial prcssure, gob addition and tar addition on <strong>the</strong> coke strength<br />

and coke density. Product yields were determined for <strong>the</strong> runs made with clean<br />

<strong>coal</strong>. Also, chemical analysis <strong>of</strong> gases, tars and cokes were obtained for <strong>the</strong><br />

clean <strong>coal</strong> runs and <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above mentioned independent variables on<br />

<strong>the</strong> methane, carbon monoxide and hydrogen contents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> product gas was<br />

i live 5t ig<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />

Appar<strong>at</strong>us:<br />

The pressurized coker is a 48” long, 2” diameter, double x wall pipe<br />

made <strong>of</strong> Alonized 316 SS. The coker tube is capable <strong>of</strong> being rot<strong>at</strong>ed about an<br />

axis loc<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> tube center as Shown in Figure 10. The outlet half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>


coker tube is electrically he<strong>at</strong>ed with G, 520 w<strong>at</strong>t, resistance he<strong>at</strong>ers. Skin<br />

and internal temper<strong>at</strong>urcs are continuously monitored and recorded on a strip<br />

chart. The, tar trap is a small w<strong>at</strong>er-cooled pressure vessel. A dip tube<br />

connected to <strong>the</strong> detachable lid reaches to <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> a teflon bottle tightly<br />

fitted into <strong>the</strong> tar trap body. Glass Wool, placed in <strong>the</strong> annular space between<br />

<strong>the</strong> dip tube and <strong>the</strong> bottle neck acts as a demister. An opening is provided in<br />

<strong>the</strong> tar trap lid for gas withdrawal.<br />

A pressure control valve is loc<strong>at</strong>ed downstream <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tar trap and is<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ed by a recording pressure controller 3nd a pressure transmitter which is<br />

connected to <strong>the</strong> gas inlet piping <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coker.<br />

A dry ice temper<strong>at</strong>ure cold trap is loc<strong>at</strong>ed downstream <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pressure<br />

control valve. Gas sampling bags and gas meters are provided on <strong>the</strong> tail end <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> system.<br />

Procedure :<br />

A 100 gram sample <strong>of</strong> sized <strong>coal</strong> or <strong>of</strong> a <strong>coal</strong> and gob mixture is<br />

inserted inlo <strong>the</strong> cool inlet. side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coker while <strong>the</strong> body is kept in <strong>the</strong><br />

horizontal position. When tar was to be added to <strong>the</strong> sample a solution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

desired weight <strong>of</strong> tar in 5 ml <strong>of</strong> toluene was prepared. The solids were immersed<br />

in this solution, <strong>the</strong> toluene was evapor<strong>at</strong>ed in a vacuum oven <strong>at</strong> 5OoC and <strong>the</strong><br />

sample was chilled in an ice chest prior to loading into <strong>the</strong> coker.<br />

After <strong>the</strong> sample was charged into <strong>the</strong> coker, <strong>the</strong> inlet flange was<br />

<strong>at</strong>tached and <strong>the</strong> whole system purged with nitrogen <strong>at</strong> <strong>at</strong>mospheric pressure.<br />

He<strong>at</strong>-up was begun and when thc coker <strong>the</strong>rmowell temper<strong>at</strong>ure approached 1.300°F,<br />

<strong>the</strong> nitrogen purge was switched to <strong>the</strong> desired gas mixture and <strong>the</strong> gas flow r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

and oper<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>pressures</strong> were set as specified for <strong>the</strong> desired run.<br />

When <strong>the</strong> coker bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure reached 1472'F (800°C) an inlet gas<br />

sample was taken by opening and closing previously evacu<strong>at</strong>ed gas sample bomb. A<br />

split stream <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>f gas was diverted into a gas sample bag and <strong>the</strong> coker<br />

body was tilted into <strong>the</strong> vertical position. The sample dropped into <strong>the</strong> hot<br />

zone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coker and <strong>the</strong> <strong>coking</strong> process was begun. This shock he<strong>at</strong>ing under<br />

pressurc <strong>at</strong>tempts to simul<strong>at</strong>e <strong>coal</strong> falling into <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> a moving bed gasifier.<br />

The power was turned <strong>of</strong>f after 15 minutes running time and <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>f gas<br />

sample was collected for a total <strong>of</strong> one hour. The system was <strong>the</strong>n depressurized,<br />

<strong>the</strong> cold trap closed, and <strong>the</strong> coker was vented and kept under a small nitrogen<br />

purge until <strong>the</strong> appar<strong>at</strong>us cooled down. The tar trap was <strong>the</strong>n disconnected and<br />

<strong>the</strong> tar removed, separ<strong>at</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er phase and weighed. The coke was<br />

removed and weighed after <strong>the</strong> coker internal temper<strong>at</strong>ure had dropped below 200'F.<br />

Results and Discussion:<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> ten different tests were devised to investig<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total oper<strong>at</strong>ing pressure, <strong>the</strong> hydrogen partial pressure and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample<br />

composition on coke strength, coke density, <strong>coking</strong> yields and on <strong>the</strong> composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> products. Table 9 is a list <strong>of</strong> test conditions. All <strong>the</strong> tests were made<br />

on <strong>coal</strong> sized 314" x 114" except test 10. Experiments were performed in<br />

<strong>at</strong>mospheres <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r 100qb prepurified nitrogen or mixtures <strong>of</strong> prepurified<br />

nitrogen with hydrogen. It should be mentioned th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> tests identified as<br />

No. 2 and No. 7 were done for EFRI-Champion <strong>coal</strong> only.<br />

1


A comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results obtained from tests Nos. 3, 4 and 5 shows<br />

<strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> total pressure, namely, <strong>at</strong>mospheric, 215 psig and 365 psig on coke<br />

strength and mercury density <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coke. Similarly, a comparison <strong>of</strong> tests<br />

Nos. 2, 3 and 6 shows <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> 0, 65 and 115 psia hydrogen partial pressure<br />

(<strong>the</strong> balance being nitrogen) on <strong>the</strong> same variables. Tests Nos. 1, 6 and 9<br />

compare <strong>the</strong>'effects <strong>of</strong> gob addition to <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>, with test No. 1 investig<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

"clean" <strong>coal</strong>, No. 6, <strong>coal</strong> doped with 10% gob and No. 9, <strong>coal</strong> doped with 20%<br />

gob. Tests Nos. 7 and 8 study <strong>the</strong> effect on <strong>the</strong> above mentioned <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

adding 5 and 10 wt $ tar to a <strong>coal</strong> sample doped with 10% gob. Test No. 10 was<br />

run on a "clean <strong>coal</strong>" sample sized 1/4" x 12 mesh <strong>at</strong> 365 psia total pressure and<br />

115 psia <strong>of</strong> hydrogen partial pressure. The finer size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> feed <strong>coal</strong> for this<br />

test allowed for :i more homogeneous sample than was possible when 3/4" x 1/4"<br />

<strong>coal</strong> Was used which, in turn, permitted better d<strong>at</strong>a on yield and coke composition<br />

to be obtained.<br />

The inherent variability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and particularly th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gob<br />

samples used rendered any yield calcul<strong>at</strong>ions based on <strong>the</strong>se feed mixtures useless.<br />

Hence, only those runs made with undoped clean <strong>coal</strong> wcre used for yield<br />

de t e r mi na t ions .<br />

Figure 11 is a plot <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> various parameters on <strong>the</strong> coke<br />

strength. The plotted d<strong>at</strong>a are averages <strong>of</strong> all runs made <strong>at</strong> each set <strong>of</strong><br />

conditions. Thc following conclusions may be drawn from this figure:<br />

1. The strength <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coke made from <strong>the</strong> low fluidity <strong>coal</strong>s (Frances<br />

and Upper Hiaw<strong>at</strong>ha) and from <strong>the</strong> medlum fluidity <strong>coal</strong>s (Rossington<br />

and Burning Star) is inversely proportional to total pressure.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> increasing pressure on <strong>the</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> coke made<br />

from thc high fluidity <strong>coal</strong>s (EPRI, Westland and Noble County) is<br />

negligible.<br />

2. The effcct <strong>of</strong> hydrogen partial pressure on <strong>the</strong> coke strength is<br />

small and variable (Figure 11).<br />

3. The results rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> effect on <strong>the</strong> coke strength <strong>of</strong> doping<br />

clean <strong>coal</strong> with 10% and 204 gob are inconclusive. The coke strength<br />

decreases or remains basically unchanged in six <strong>of</strong> seven cases, <strong>the</strong><br />

exccption being Lhe Burning Star <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

4.<br />

The addition <strong>of</strong> 10 wt $ tar to <strong>coal</strong> previously doped with 10 wt $<br />

gob caused a slight increase in <strong>the</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coke produced<br />

in most cases with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Upper Hiaw<strong>at</strong>ha and Burning<br />

Star <strong>coal</strong>s,<br />

Figure 12 is a plot <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> pressure, gas composition and<br />

gob and tar addition on <strong>the</strong> coke density. These are particle densities as<br />

determined by mercury displacement <strong>at</strong> one <strong>at</strong>mosphere. The d<strong>at</strong>a shown in this<br />

figure suggest th<strong>at</strong>:<br />

1. The coke density remains <strong>the</strong> same or decreases very slightly when<br />

<strong>the</strong> total pressure is increased from <strong>at</strong>mospheric to 350 psig.<br />

9


2. 'The density 01' <strong>the</strong> coke produced I'roln thc studied <strong>coal</strong>s depends<br />

little on <strong>the</strong> hydrogen partial pressure. IiOWeVer, a slight increase<br />

in density with increased hydrogen pressure is seen for <strong>the</strong> high<br />

fluidity <strong>coal</strong>s.<br />

3. As cx1,ected increased gob contents lead to increased particle<br />

densi ties.<br />

4.<br />

The <strong>at</strong>idition <strong>of</strong> 10 WC % tar to low fluidity <strong>coal</strong>s did not have<br />

any effect on <strong>the</strong> density <strong>of</strong> Lhe c.oke. IloWeVCr, <strong>the</strong> Same addition<br />

to medium fluidity <strong>coal</strong>s doped with 10% gob caused <strong>the</strong> coke density<br />

to increase significant,ly. A slight increase is observed for two<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three high fluidity <strong>coal</strong>s (EPI11 and Westland) while a decrease<br />

was found for <strong>the</strong> Noblc County <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

Interestingly, his ra<strong>the</strong>r complex picture <strong>of</strong> coke strength and density<br />

may, as appears to be <strong>the</strong> case for <strong>the</strong> fluidity and swclling d<strong>at</strong>a, be<br />

explainable in terms <strong>of</strong> a few petrographic parameters. More d<strong>at</strong>a on different<br />

<strong>coal</strong>s will show just how good a correl<strong>at</strong>ion can be obtained.<br />

Yield d<strong>at</strong>a were collected for cach 01 <strong>the</strong> over 100 coker runs in this<br />

program, llowever, as mentioned earlier thc majority 01 <strong>the</strong>se d<strong>at</strong>a arc <strong>of</strong> little<br />

value. Only <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a obtained with clean <strong>coal</strong> samples give useful yield d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

A summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> yield d<strong>at</strong>a lrom <strong>the</strong> runs made <strong>at</strong> simul<strong>at</strong>ed gasifier conditions<br />

(i.e., 365 psia total pressure and 115 psia hydrogen pressure) on 1/4" x 12 mesh<br />

<strong>coal</strong> is g~ven in Table 10. These d<strong>at</strong>a arc based on <strong>the</strong> average measured coke,<br />

tal- and liquid yields for all runs <strong>at</strong> thcse COIldi~ionS for each <strong>coal</strong> (On a<br />

moisture and ash free basis), with <strong>the</strong> gas yield calcul<strong>at</strong>ed by difference.<br />

In all eases <strong>the</strong> coke yield <strong>at</strong> simul<strong>at</strong>ed gasifier c.onditions <strong>of</strong> 365<br />

psia total pressure and 115 psia hydrogen partial pressure is gre<strong>at</strong>er than <strong>the</strong><br />

fixed carbon content determined for each <strong>coal</strong> <strong>at</strong> 1 <strong>at</strong>m (Table 1). This is not<br />

surprising since <strong>at</strong> elev<strong>at</strong>ed pressure <strong>the</strong> release <strong>of</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile components is<br />

retarded. ( 1 3 2 9 3 ) The slowing <strong>of</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile release allows more <strong>of</strong> this m<strong>at</strong>erial<br />

to be converted 1.0 colic <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> liquid and/or gas yield.<br />

The yield d<strong>at</strong>a lor Frances <strong>coal</strong>, 'Table 11, where only clean <strong>coal</strong> was<br />

used, shows th<strong>at</strong> both coke and gas yields are increased <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

liquid yield in going from 1 <strong>at</strong>m N2 pressure to 365 psia <strong>of</strong> NZ. Here <strong>the</strong> coke<br />

yield increases from - GS$ to - 67.5% and <strong>the</strong> gas yield increases from - 25% to<br />

29yo while <strong>the</strong> liquid yield decreases from - 10% to - 4%. Possibly liquid<br />

evolution repression can account for both <strong>the</strong> increased coke <strong>at</strong>id gas yields. If<br />

<strong>the</strong> liquid is held in <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> m<strong>at</strong>rix some <strong>of</strong> it is coked and some is fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

converted to gas by <strong>the</strong> longer residence time <strong>at</strong> elev<strong>at</strong>ed temper<strong>at</strong>ures thus<br />

rcdtrcing thc overnll liquid yicld and increasing 1.hc cokc and gas yields. A1<br />

elev<strong>at</strong>ed hydrogen <strong>pressures</strong> (115 psia and 365 psia total pressure) <strong>the</strong> coke<br />

yield is about <strong>the</strong> same as when 365 psia <strong>of</strong> nitrogen is used, however, <strong>the</strong><br />

liquid yield is gre<strong>at</strong>ly enhanced <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas yield. Undoubtedly<br />

react.ion between <strong>the</strong> added hydrogen and <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> are responsible for <strong>the</strong> higher<br />

liquid yield.<br />

Figure 13 shows a comparison <strong>of</strong> produced gas composition with respect<br />

to CH4, co and & <strong>at</strong> various conditions. Since most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se d<strong>at</strong>a were obtained<br />

with <strong>coal</strong> doped with gob <strong>the</strong> results may not bc as 1.eliable as if only clean <strong>coal</strong><br />

10


was used, however, general trends are not expected to differ from those observed<br />

here. The methane content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> product gas is SO-lOO% higher than for <strong>the</strong><br />

case with no added hydrogen while <strong>the</strong> hydrogen content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> product is<br />

considerably lower.<br />

Qualit<strong>at</strong>ively this suggests th<strong>at</strong> hydrogen evolved irom <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> escapes<br />

before it has time to react fur<strong>the</strong>r wit.h 1.hc remaining <strong>coal</strong> m<strong>at</strong>rix. The CO<br />

content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> product appears virtually unaCf‘ected by pressure and <strong>the</strong> addition<br />

01 gob and/or tar has little or no cffect 011 <strong>the</strong> gas composition.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Thc experimental d<strong>at</strong>a presented herein should provide a start 011 <strong>the</strong><br />

required d<strong>at</strong>a base which will ultim<strong>at</strong>ely permit <strong>the</strong> prediction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coking</strong><br />

<strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s being considered as potential gasifier feedstocks. The<br />

limited d<strong>at</strong>a obtained pertaining to pyrolysis yields and gas composition are<br />

encouraging and suggest h<strong>at</strong> accur<strong>at</strong>e gas yield predictions may also he possible<br />

<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> conclusion <strong>of</strong> his program. The cffccts or process variables on <strong>coal</strong><br />

swelling and fluidity has been fairly well established, but more work is needed<br />

to get predictive ma<strong>the</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ical correl<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se as well as <strong>coking</strong> and<br />

pyrolysis <strong>properties</strong> or Coals.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

This work was supported in part by <strong>the</strong> Electric Power ‘Research Institute<br />

(EPRI). Contract. ?io. 1tP 1267-7.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Kaiho, M. and ‘l’oda, Y., Changes in Thermoplastic Properties <strong>of</strong> Coal<br />

Under Pressure 01 Various Gases. Fuel 5X, 397 (hlay, 1979).<br />

-<br />

2. Lancet, !VI. S. and Sim, F. A., The ECfect <strong>of</strong> Pressure and Gas Composition<br />

on <strong>the</strong> Fluidity <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh No. 8 Coal, Preprints <strong>of</strong> Fuel Chemistry<br />

Div. ACS, Vol 26, No. 3 (August, 1981).<br />

-<br />

3. Van Krevelen. U. W., Ilitntjcns, F. S. and Dormans, H. N. hl., Chemical<br />

SLructurcs and Propcrties <strong>of</strong> Coal XVI - - Plastic Behavior on He<strong>at</strong>ing,<br />

Fuel 35, 462 (1955).<br />

-<br />

4. Lewellen, P. C., Product Decomposition Effects in Coal Pyrolysis, hlasters<br />

Thesis, Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering, MIT, (1975).<br />

5. ASTN Standard hlethod D720-67, Free Swelling Index <strong>of</strong> Coal (1977).<br />

11


- Coal<br />

0 ri 6 i 1<br />

hloisture<br />

As Atinlyzed<br />

Proxim<strong>at</strong>e, Dry<br />

\'olarilc hl:il.ter, Q<br />

Fixed Carbon<br />

A SI1<br />

Ultim<strong>at</strong>e, Dry<br />

Hydrogen,<br />

c 3 1.b011<br />

S 1 L rogen<br />

Oxygen (Diff.)<br />

Sulfur<br />

Ash<br />

HIN, Dry<br />

Btu/lb<br />

Ultim<strong>at</strong>e, hV\F<br />

Hydrogen, $<br />

C a rlmn<br />

Nitrogen<br />

Oxygen (Diff.)<br />

Sulfur<br />

Gie scler Flu id i t y ,<br />

(DD Phl)<br />

Free Swelling<br />

Index (FSI)<br />

Hard grove<br />

Grindability<br />

S t rengt h Index<br />

I'g 11.<br />

No. 8<br />

Scaiii<br />

Table 1<br />

Coniposition <strong>of</strong> Fccd Coals<br />

2. 23<br />

37.93<br />

.I 9. 9.1<br />

12.13<br />

.I. 93<br />

72.52<br />

1. .I5<br />

li.80<br />

2.17<br />

12.13<br />

12,955<br />

5.til<br />

b2.53<br />

1.6s<br />

7.74<br />

2.47<br />

5,100<br />

7<br />

52.9<br />

0.849<br />

I'g 11 .<br />

No. 8<br />

Scam<br />

2.02<br />

3G.28<br />

52.21<br />

11.51<br />

4.84<br />

73.13<br />

1.51<br />

7.16<br />

1.65<br />

11.51<br />

12,99C<br />

5:17<br />

82.64<br />

1.71<br />

8.09<br />

2.09<br />

15,300<br />

7<br />

62.9<br />

0.886<br />

12<br />

U<br />

Ohio<br />

No. 3<br />

ScJm<br />

2.tix<br />

.1-I . 3(i<br />

46.10<br />

9.54<br />

5.lG<br />

72.70<br />

1.05<br />

8.12<br />

3.43<br />

9.54<br />

13,370<br />

5.70<br />

80.37<br />

l.lG<br />

n. 98<br />

3.79<br />

27,000<br />

4<br />

49.7<br />

0.806<br />

Ill.<br />

No. G<br />

Scnm<br />

9.99<br />

42.94<br />

43.52<br />

13.5.1<br />

'I . 6.2<br />

(;3.00<br />

1 . 31<br />

$).?ti<br />

3.21<br />

13.5.1<br />

12,165<br />

5.3x<br />

78.65<br />

1.52<br />

10.71<br />

3.75<br />

4 . 7<br />

3.5<br />

.?X. 7<br />

0.831<br />

Scotlnnd England Utah<br />

6. 62<br />

38.84<br />

56.93<br />

4.23<br />

5.07<br />

78.73<br />

1. 60<br />

9.93<br />

0.44<br />

4.23<br />

13,790<br />

5.29<br />

82.21<br />

1.67<br />

10.37<br />

0.46<br />

1 .o<br />

1.5<br />

38. 6<br />

0.942<br />

5.81<br />

38.01<br />

59.04<br />

2.95<br />

5 .06<br />

79.13<br />

1.66<br />

9. G 8<br />

1.52<br />

2.95<br />

1'1,195<br />

5.21<br />

81.54<br />

1.71<br />

9.97<br />

1.57<br />

5.3<br />

3.5<br />

48.3<br />

0.847<br />

7.39<br />

41.74<br />

50.36<br />

7.90<br />

4. 9'1<br />

72.08<br />

1.25<br />

13.35<br />

0.48<br />

7.90<br />

12,688<br />

5.36<br />

78.26<br />

1.36<br />

14.50<br />

0.52<br />

0<br />

1<br />

45. 6<br />

0.884


1<br />

D<br />

13<br />

3<br />

G


14<br />

7<br />

..<br />

..<br />

11


Table 8<br />

L_<br />

Effect os FaeO Compo.lrl""<br />

on <strong>the</strong> Swelling 01 Diflercni Coals<br />

Zl'lll<br />

coa 1<br />

/I" rn, "E<br />

Cha.-;rior. hcsilznd Soblc Stor upper<br />

PII~SCYIE~ Pittsburgh<br />

so. n So. 6<br />

CounTy<br />

Ohio Xo. 9<br />

Illinois<br />

So. 6<br />

FrnnCe~<br />

Sc<strong>of</strong>iniid<br />

RO55ingIDn<br />

EnClsnrl<br />

H1aYalha<br />

Utah<br />

-------<br />

3.0<br />

a,.:<br />

2.2<br />

2.6<br />

2.8<br />

1.9<br />

a.1<br />

__<br />

3.0<br />

2.3<br />

2.1<br />

-.<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

--<br />

1.0<br />

.-<br />

_ _<br />

__<br />

1.8<br />

1.8<br />

1.7<br />

._<br />

0.9<br />

0.9<br />

0.9<br />

-_<br />

2.9 3.8 2.3 1.9 1.1 2.0 0.9<br />

16


I<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

17<br />

2.1. A<br />

22.0<br />

..<br />

I "<br />

2-.7<br />

20.8<br />

21.8<br />

25.2<br />

..<br />

..


i-l SPARE SAblPLE<br />

Plortlc 209<br />

Figure I<br />

Sample Prepar<strong>at</strong>ion Scheme<br />

LATER USE<br />

114 Sample Plastic Bag<br />

RIFFLE<br />

I PROGRklA TESTS I k Sample '14 Sample<br />

'12 Sample<br />

I--<br />

>-<br />

c<br />

0<br />

3<br />

ti. 3<br />

TO ANliLYTlCAL LAB TO PETROGRAPHY LAB SAVE<br />

200,00(<br />

100,00(<br />

50.00(<br />

10,000<br />

5POO<br />

Figure 2<br />

EFFECT OF HEATING RATE CN THE FLUIDITY OF<br />

PITTSBURGH NO 8 ANU OHIO NO 9 SEA:.! COALS<br />

/+<br />

/<br />

TOTL F2ESSU;E<br />

365 PSlP<br />

HYC8OGEW PRESSEE:<br />

115 ?SIB<br />

+ E?i?I.C2X!?IC>I<br />

o WESTLCi3<br />

/ O NOELE CO<br />

3 G<br />

HEATING RATE ('C/:.ll:Il<br />

18


100,000 -<br />

50,000 -<br />

- 10,000 -<br />

b<br />

- a<br />

D 5,000 .<br />

r<br />

c_<br />

e<br />

3<br />

J u_<br />

Figure 3<br />

EFFECT OF HEATING RATE ONTHE FLUIDITY OF<br />

BURNING STAR AND ROSSINGTON COALS<br />

lDOO<br />

100 -<br />

50 -<br />

I I I<br />

3 6<br />

HEATING RATE I"CIMIN.1<br />

--o<br />

.+-<br />

--c -,----o--<br />

/e-.-<br />

+-t-<br />

/A'<br />

18VOL.% H2 31 5 VOL.% H1<br />

100%N2 ~~VOL.~I~NI 685VOL%N?<br />

0-<br />

0-<br />

IOTbl PRESSURE:<br />

365 KIA<br />

HYDROGEN PRESSURE<br />

115 PSlP<br />

a BURNING STAROAL<br />

0 ROSSINGTON COAL<br />

Figure 4<br />

EFFECT OF GAS COMPOSITION ON THE FLUIDITY OF<br />

VARIOUS COALS<br />

TOTAL PRESSURE 350 B IG<br />

HEATING RATE. 67C MIN<br />

SAMPLE: 9OWT %-35Y COAL+1OWTS-lOOHG00<br />

+ EPRI-CHAYPION<br />

OWESTLANO<br />

o NOBLE co<br />

0 ROSSINGTON<br />

A BURNING STAR<br />

.NOTE'<br />

SCALE CHANGE<br />

a'<br />

I<br />

19


-<br />

z<br />

c<br />

100,000<br />

50,000<br />

10,000<br />

0<br />

n 5,000<br />

I<br />

y<br />

Y<br />

e<br />

1,000<br />

500<br />

100,000 -<br />

Figure 5<br />

EFFECT OF GOB ADOITION ON THE FLUIDITY OF<br />

VARICUS COALS<br />

TOTAL PRESSURE: 365 PSlP<br />

HYDROGEN PRESSURE: 115 PSlA<br />

HEATING RATE: 6'Cl YIN<br />

-<br />

O\<br />

: t.<br />

-<br />

-=-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

50,000 - +-<br />

e .<br />

a-<br />

1m:o<br />

COAL: Goa RATIO<br />

B 0'<br />

2 10,000 -<br />

-<br />

* 5,000 -<br />

n<br />

3<br />

Y<br />

1,000 -<br />

500 -<br />

9O:K):O<br />

0 /<br />

t EPRI-CWYWN<br />

0 WESTLAND<br />

0 NOBLE CO.<br />

Figure 6<br />

EFFECT OF TAR ADDITION ON THE FLUIDITY OF<br />

VARIOUS COALS DOPE0 WITH 10% GOB<br />

__-. ,-<br />

t'<br />

/$<br />

09:10:1<br />

COAL: GOB: TAR RATIO<br />

RESINGTON<br />

A B UllNG STAR<br />

TOTAL PRESSURE : 365 PSlA<br />

HYDROGEN PRESSURE: 115 PSU<br />

HEATING RATE: 6'WMlN<br />

t EPRI-CWUPION<br />

0 WESTLAND<br />

0 NOBLE CO<br />

0 ROSSINGTON<br />

A BURNING STAR<br />

I<br />

1


4 0<br />

Figure 7<br />

Pressurized Swelling Index Appar<strong>at</strong>us'<br />

Figure 8<br />

EFFECT OF SAMPLE COMPOSITION ON THE SWELLING<br />

OF VARIOUS COALS<br />

3 0-<br />

2.0 -.<br />

LOT<br />

TI0<br />

t EPRI-CHAYPION<br />

0 WESTLANO<br />

0 NOBLE CO.<br />

BURNING STLR<br />

* FRANCES<br />

ROSSINGTON<br />

A UPPER HIPWATHA<br />

T= 1500t 5.F<br />

Plot = 365 Pilo<br />

PHI : 115 Ria


Flnure 9<br />

SWELLltlG PROPERTIES OF PITTSBURGH NO. 8 8 ILLllOlS NO, t COPLS<br />

PITTSBURGH No. 8<br />

7<br />

+ 1<br />

1 ATMOSPHERE - NITROGEN 1 ATMOSPHERE - NITROGEN<br />

1 350<br />

PSIG - NITROGEN<br />

L<br />

350 PSIG - HYDWGEN<br />

ILLINOIS No. 6<br />

BURNING STAR<br />

I<br />

350 PSIG - NITROGEN 1<br />

I<br />

3% PSIG - -1<br />

Figure IO<br />

Pressurized Coker<br />

22<br />

HYDROGEN


Figure 11<br />

EFFECT OF SAMPLE COMPOSITION, TOTAL PRESSURE AND<br />

HYDROGEN PRESSURE ON THE COKE STRENGTH<br />

T : BOO*C<br />

Plol 365 Psi0<br />

PHz. 115 Psi0<br />

11055-<br />

TOTAL<br />

PRESSURE<br />

(PrlOi<br />

T EOO'C<br />

Fi ure 12<br />

EFFECT OF SAMPLE CdMPOSITION, TOTAL PRESSURE AND<br />

HYDROGEN PRESSURE ON COKE DENSITY<br />

I SAHRE COHWSITION<br />

23<br />

101.365 Prii<br />

-1Cd:Gob<br />

+%/ 3-t-<br />

t EPRI-CHAMPION<br />

DWESnANO<br />

ONOBLE CO.<br />

AByRNlNG STAR<br />

+FRANCES<br />

oROSSlNGTON<br />

.UPPER HIAW&THA<br />

VALUES SHOWN ARE<br />

AVERAGES OF ALL<br />

DATA AT<br />

GIVEN CONOITIONS<br />

-1.<br />

VALUES SHOWN<br />

.---*<br />

___<br />

' I 65 I<br />

HYDROGEN<br />

PRESSURE<br />

IPriol<br />

EPRI-CHAMPION<br />

WESTLAND<br />

'NOBE CO<br />

.BURNING STAR<br />

-FRANCES<br />

I RWSSINGTON<br />

,UPPER<br />

HI AWPTHA<br />

&?E AVEPdGB<br />

Of AU OATA AT<br />

GlMN aYlDTlONS


Fi ure 13<br />

EFFECT OF TOTAL PRESSQRE, HYDROGEN PRESSURE AND<br />

SAMPLE COMPOSITION ON Hz, CO AND CH, CONTENT IN<br />

PRODUCT GAS<br />

'tot (PSI01<br />

': 800OC<br />

'Hi0 Prio<br />

:ICool :Gob<br />

(I<br />

a<br />

PHz( Ria)<br />

T : 800' C<br />

Ptot: 365 Psi1<br />

9:ICwl:Gob<br />

.800°C, Ptol:365 Psi0<br />

PHz. 115 Psi0<br />

24<br />

tEPRI-CHAMPION<br />

OWESTLAND<br />

o NOBLE CO.<br />

A BURNING STAR<br />

* FRANCES<br />

0 AOSSINGTON<br />

A UPPER<br />

HIAWATHA<br />

VUES SHOWN<br />

ARE AVERAGES OF<br />

AU DATA AT<br />

GIVEN CONDITIONS


EFFECTS OF PREOXIDATION ON PYROLYSIS BEHAVIOR<br />

AND RESULTANT CHAR STRUCTURE OF CAKING COALS<br />

P D. J. Maloney and R. G. Jenkins<br />

The Fuels and Combustion Labor<strong>at</strong>ory<br />

The Pennsylvania St<strong>at</strong>e University, University Park, PA 16802<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

l Coal gasific<strong>at</strong>ion processes may be divided into two stages. They are, <strong>the</strong><br />

initial rapid release <strong>of</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter and <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ively slow gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> residual char. These two processes are not, however, totally independent be-<br />

1, cause <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong> tre<strong>at</strong>ment conditions under which <strong>coal</strong> pyrolysis occurs determine,<br />

( to a large extent, <strong>the</strong> structure and reactivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> remaining char (1). The<br />

' importance <strong>of</strong> understanding devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion kinetics has long been recognized<br />

(2-6). However, it is surprising to note th<strong>at</strong> very little inform<strong>at</strong>ion is available<br />

in <strong>the</strong> liter<strong>at</strong>ure regarding <strong>the</strong> structure and reactivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chars produced<br />

1 in <strong>the</strong>se studies.<br />

The work described here is concerned with <strong>the</strong> utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> bituminous (caking)<br />

<strong>coal</strong>s in dilute phase, rapid he<strong>at</strong>ing gasific<strong>at</strong>ion and combustion systems. Two<br />

highly caking <strong>coal</strong>s were pyrolyzed in an entrained flow tube furnace system and<br />

devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion kinetics determined for each <strong>coal</strong> <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> 900 and 1000°C.<br />

Structural <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chars collected in this work were <strong>the</strong>n analyzed. In<br />

addition, <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> mild preoxid<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>coal</strong>s upon <strong>the</strong>ir subsequent<br />

pyrolysis behavior were examined. Samples <strong>of</strong> each <strong>coal</strong> were oxidized to various<br />

levels prior to he<strong>at</strong> tre<strong>at</strong>ment. Devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion kinetics and structural <strong>properties</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chars produced were <strong>the</strong>n analyzed. Results reported here follow <strong>the</strong> develop-<br />

ment <strong>of</strong> char structure with varying he<strong>at</strong>, tre<strong>at</strong>ment conditions and examine changes<br />

in char morphology which occur on preoxid<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>coal</strong>s. This work is <strong>of</strong><br />

practical importance in future design consider<strong>at</strong>ions for dilute phase gasifiers<br />

and <strong>of</strong> particular interest in gasific<strong>at</strong>ion schemes where agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> caking<br />

<strong>coal</strong>s can cause serious problems.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

Pyrolysis experiments were conducted in an entrained flow tube furnace somewh<strong>at</strong><br />

similar to th<strong>at</strong> described by Scaroni et al. (7,8) and Nsakala and coworkers (9).<br />

Briefly, a dilute-phase <strong>coal</strong> stream is entrained in a primary carrier gas, passed<br />

through a w<strong>at</strong>er cooled probe and <strong>the</strong>n injected into <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> a prehe<strong>at</strong>ed secondary<br />

gas stream. The secondary gas stream enters <strong>the</strong> reaction zone <strong>at</strong> a temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

slightly above <strong>the</strong> furnace wall temper<strong>at</strong>ure so th<strong>at</strong> upon mixing <strong>the</strong> combined<br />

gas stream <strong>at</strong>tains <strong>the</strong> desired reaction temper<strong>at</strong>ure (? 10OC). The primary modes<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> particle he<strong>at</strong>ing are conduction from <strong>the</strong> gas and radi<strong>at</strong>ion from <strong>the</strong> furnace<br />

walls. He<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>es in excess <strong>of</strong> 10,OOO°C/s are estim<strong>at</strong>ed. Coal particles travel<br />

in a pencil stream down <strong>the</strong> axis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> furnace tube. Samples are collected and<br />

rapidly quenched (> 10,OOO°C/s quench r<strong>at</strong>e) using a w<strong>at</strong>er cooled probe which is<br />

inserted up <strong>the</strong> axis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> furnace. Reaction times are varied by changing <strong>the</strong><br />

position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sampling probe rel<strong>at</strong>ive to <strong>the</strong> injector. The oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions<br />

<strong>at</strong> each temper<strong>at</strong>ure studied are given in Table 1.<br />

Helium is used as <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

The secondary<br />

carrier gas and is adjusted to maintain isokinetic sample injection.<br />

gas is nitrogen.<br />

Weight loss due to pyrolysis was determined using ash as a tracer. The proxi-<br />

m<strong>at</strong>e analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> samples used in this work are presented in Table 2. The <strong>coal</strong>s<br />

examined were PSOC-1133 a LV <strong>coal</strong> from <strong>the</strong> Lower Kittaning seam in Pennsylvania<br />

25


TABLE 1. OPERATING CONDITIONS<br />

Oper<strong>at</strong>ing Temper<strong>at</strong>ure "C 900 1000<br />

Coal Feed R<strong>at</strong>e g/min 0.5 0.5<br />

Mean Gas Velocity cm/s<br />

Secondary N2/Primary He (Mole Basis)<br />

97<br />

26.4<br />

TABLE 2. PROXIMATE ANALYSES OF SAMPLES (200x270 mesh fractions)<br />

Sample Moisture, % Ash, % Vol<strong>at</strong>ile M<strong>at</strong>ter, % Fixed Carbon, %<br />

PSOC-1099 (Raw Coal) 1.6 9.0 33.7 56.7<br />

PSOC-1099 (1% O2 added) 0.9 12.6 32.5 64.0<br />

PSOC-1133 (Raw Coal) 0.4 16.4 18.5 64.7<br />

PSOC-1133 (0.5% O2 added) 1.1 19.3 17.6 62.0<br />

PSOC-1133 (1% O2 added) 1.1 19.5 18.2 62.2<br />

and PSOC-1099 a HVA <strong>coal</strong> from <strong>the</strong> Pittsburgh seam in Pennsylvania. All work was con-<br />

ducted on 200x270 mesh size fractions with mean particle diameter <strong>of</strong> 63 um.<br />

Preoxidized samples were prepared in a fluidized bed furnace. Samples <strong>of</strong> sized<br />

<strong>coal</strong> (200x270 mesh) were fluidized in nitrogen and brought to reaction temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

(175OC). The fluidizing gas was <strong>the</strong>n switched to air and <strong>the</strong> samples were oxidized<br />

for various predetermined times. Oxid<strong>at</strong>ion times were determined based upon <strong>the</strong>rmo-<br />

gravimetric studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> air oxid<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> each <strong>coal</strong>. It is assumed th<strong>at</strong> oxid<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

r<strong>at</strong>es in <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmobalance and fluidized bed systems are equivalent. This assumption<br />

is valid if one insures th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> O2 partial pressure in each system is <strong>the</strong> same<br />

and th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are no bed diffusion effects in <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmobalance system. Oper<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

conditions were selected to meet <strong>the</strong>se requirements. Oxid<strong>at</strong>ion levels reported<br />

here are given as % weight gain on oxid<strong>at</strong>ion (dry <strong>coal</strong> basis).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Typical weight loss versus time curves for devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> PSOC-1133 (LV<br />

<strong>coal</strong>) are presented in Figure 1. This plot shows weight loss is essentially complete<br />

within <strong>the</strong> first 100 msec <strong>of</strong> residence time. The same behavior was observed for<br />

<strong>the</strong> HVA <strong>coal</strong> examined in this study. These results are in good agreement with th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Badzioch and Hawksley (10). In similar experimental systems it is <strong>of</strong>ten assumed<br />

th<strong>at</strong> pyrolysis occurs iso<strong>the</strong>rmally (7-10), however, this assumption cannot be made<br />

for <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s analyzed here.<br />

Figure 1 also shows <strong>the</strong> maximum weight loss for devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> 900°C is<br />

gre<strong>at</strong>er than <strong>at</strong> 1000°C. Similar observ<strong>at</strong>ions have been reported by Menster et al.<br />

(11,lZ). These authors suggest a possible explan<strong>at</strong>ion for this behavior which involves<br />

a competition between bond breaking reactions (which result in vol<strong>at</strong>ile form<strong>at</strong>ion)<br />

and secondary recombin<strong>at</strong>ion or polymeriz<strong>at</strong>ion (char forming) reactions,<br />

Figures 2 and 3 demonstr<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> preoxid<strong>at</strong>ion on devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

behavior. Oxid<strong>at</strong>ion appears to have little effect on <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> pyrolysis, how-<br />

ever, devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion occurs so rapidly th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> time resolution <strong>of</strong> this system<br />

may be inadequ<strong>at</strong>e to distinguish such effects. Preoxid<strong>at</strong>ion reduces <strong>the</strong> yield <strong>of</strong><br />

vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>erial in all cases examined. This corresponds with a sharp decrease<br />

26<br />

105<br />

24.2


I<br />

'<br />

in <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> condensible products (tars) collected." Increases in <strong>the</strong> level<br />

<strong>of</strong> oxid<strong>at</strong>ion prior to pyrolysis result in a progressive reduction in <strong>the</strong> yield <strong>of</strong><br />

vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>erial. Devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion curves for preoxidized <strong>coal</strong>s all have <strong>the</strong> same<br />

I characteristic shape. Weight loss passes through a shallow minimum with residence<br />

time. Fur<strong>the</strong>r study <strong>of</strong> this behavior is in progress.<br />

Figure 4 shows an electron micrograph <strong>of</strong> PSOC-1133 char collected after 330<br />

msec residence time <strong>at</strong> 1000"~. Coal structure has undergone extensive physical<br />

changes during <strong>the</strong> pyrolysis process. These chars are thin walled transparent<br />

structures commonly called cenospheres (13), <strong>the</strong> average diameter <strong>of</strong> which is three<br />

times th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> starting <strong>coal</strong>. This represents a > 20 fold increase in volume.<br />

Similar results are obtained <strong>at</strong> 900°C and for PSOC-1099 <strong>at</strong> each temper<strong>at</strong>ure studied.<br />

Under <strong>the</strong> pyrolysis conditions employed in this work cenospheres are fully developed<br />

during <strong>the</strong> early stages <strong>of</strong> pyrolysis (< 40 msec) after which no detectable changes<br />

in macroscopic <strong>properties</strong> are observed.<br />

Figure 5 is a micrograph <strong>of</strong> a preoxidized <strong>coal</strong> char (PSOC-1133, 1% oxygen added)<br />

collected after 330 msec residence time <strong>at</strong> 1000°C. These chars do not form <strong>the</strong><br />

cenosphere structures exhibited by <strong>the</strong> unoxidized <strong>coal</strong>s. Char particles are rounded<br />

in shape indic<strong>at</strong>ing th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> passes through a plastic transition during carboniz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

but no significant swelling is observed.<br />

SUPIMARY<br />

The sharp contrast in macroscopic <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chars collected in this<br />

study give rise to several important questions regarding char gasific<strong>at</strong>ion. Varying<br />

he<strong>at</strong> tre<strong>at</strong>ment conditions and <strong>coal</strong>. feed stocks give rise to chars <strong>of</strong> widely varying<br />

structure. In order to understand <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se m<strong>at</strong>erials in subsequent<br />

gasific<strong>at</strong>ion steps a more detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> char structure is required. At present<br />

microstructural <strong>properties</strong> (surface areas, porosities) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chars gener<strong>at</strong>ed in<br />

this study are being examined in an effort to better understand <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ionship<br />

between char structure and he<strong>at</strong> tre<strong>at</strong>ment conditions. Results <strong>of</strong> this work will<br />

be available shortly.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

Financial support for this work was provided by <strong>the</strong> Cooper<strong>at</strong>ive Program in<br />

Coal Research <strong>at</strong> The Pennsylvania St<strong>at</strong>e University. Coal samples were obtained<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Penn St<strong>at</strong>e/DOE <strong>coal</strong> sample bank.<br />

*Tar yields were not measured quantit<strong>at</strong>ively in this work, however, <strong>the</strong> differences<br />

in <strong>the</strong> amounts <strong>of</strong> condensible m<strong>at</strong>erials collected in <strong>the</strong> filtering systems were<br />

substantial enough to warrant <strong>the</strong> above comment.<br />

27


1. .<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

9.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Mahajan, 0. P. and Walker, P. L., Jr., "Analytical Methods for Coal and Coal<br />

Products," Vol. 2, (C. Karr, Editor), Academic Press, New York, 1978, pp. 465-<br />

494.<br />

Badzioch, S., B.C.U.R.A. Monthly Bull., 25, 285, 1961.<br />

Jones, W. Idris, J. Inst. Ful., 37, 3, 1964.<br />

Yellow, P. C., B.C.U.R.A. Monthly Bull., 9, 285, 1965.<br />

Badzioch, S., Field, M. A., Gill, D. W., Morgan, B. B., and Hawksley, P. G. W.,<br />

B.C.U.R.A. Month1.y Bull., 2, 193, 1967.<br />

Anthony, D. B. and Howard, J. B., A.1.Ch.E. Journal, 22, 625, 1976.<br />

Scaroni, A. W., Walker, P. L., Jr., and Essenhigh, R. H., ACS Div. Fuel Chem.,<br />

Preprints, E, No. 2, 123, Sept. 1979.<br />

Scaroni, A. W., Walker, P. L., Jr., and Essenhigh, R. H., Fuel., 9, 71, 1981.<br />

Nsakala, N., Essenhigh, R. H., and Walker, P. L., Jr., Comb. Sci. and Tech.,<br />

- 16, 153, 1977.<br />

10. Badzioch, S. and Hawksley, P.<br />

- 9, 521, 1970.<br />

11. Menster, M., O'Donnell, H. J.,<br />

Advances in Chemistry Series<br />

12. Menster, M., O'Donnell, H. J.<br />

- 14, No. 5, 94, 1970.<br />

13. Newall, H. E. and Sinn<strong>at</strong>t, F.<br />

G. W., Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Develop.,<br />

Ergun, S., and Friedel, R. A., "Coal Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion,"<br />

31, Am. Chem. SOC., Washington, D. C., 1974.<br />

and Ergun, S., ACS Div. Fuel Chem., Preprints,<br />

S., Fuel, 2, 424, 1924.<br />

28


\<br />

I I<br />

0<br />

Residence Tim, SCC<br />

- 900.C . - 1000-C<br />

Figure I. WEICIiT LOSS AS A FUNCTION OF RESIUESCE TIM€ FOR PSOC-I131<br />

0.1 0.2 0.3<br />

mesldence ~ine.<br />

+ - R.1" COAI<br />

0 - 0.5% oxygen nddm<br />

A - 1% Oxygen addcd<br />

Flwre 2. WEICBT LOSS VERSUS RESIDENCE TIHE AS A FUNCTION OF PREOXIOATIOB LEVEL<br />

FOR PSoc-1133<br />

50<br />

.. 40<br />

x 30<br />

a 20<br />

10<br />

0.1 0.2 0.3<br />

Reridcncc Tim. sec<br />

Figure 3. WEIGHT LOSS VERSUS RESIDENCE TlHE AS A FUNCTION OF PRUIXIDATTON LEVEL<br />

FOR P%X-LO99<br />

29


Figure 4. SCANNING ELECTRON MICROGRAPH OF PSOC-1133 CHAR<br />

330 msec Residence Time <strong>at</strong> 1000°C<br />

Figure 5. SCANNING ELECTRON MICROGRAPH OF A PREOXIDIZED COAL CHAR<br />

(PSOC-1133 1% Oxygen Added) 330 msec Residence Time <strong>at</strong><br />

looooc<br />

30


Introduction<br />

INFLUENCE OF PARTICLE STRUCTURE CHANGES ON THE<br />

RATE OF COAL CHAR REACTION WITH C02<br />

K. A. Debelak, M. A. Clark and J. T. Malito<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering<br />

Vanderbi 1 t University<br />

Nashville, TN 37235<br />

A coiiunon fe<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> gas-solid reactions is th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall process involves<br />

several steps: (1) mass transfer <strong>of</strong> reactants and products from bulk gas phase<br />

to <strong>the</strong> internal surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reacting solid particle; (2) diffusion <strong>of</strong> gaseous<br />

reactants or products through <strong>the</strong> pores <strong>of</strong> a solid reactant; (3) adsorption<br />

<strong>of</strong> gaseous reactants on sol id reactant sites and desorption <strong>of</strong> reaction products<br />

from solid surfaces; (4) <strong>the</strong> actual chemical reaction between <strong>the</strong> adsorbed<br />

gas and solid.<br />

In studying gas-solid reactants, we are concerned with <strong>the</strong>se four phenomena<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r phenomena which affect <strong>the</strong> overall r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> reaction and performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> industrial equipment in which <strong>the</strong>se gas-solid reactions are carried out.<br />

These o<strong>the</strong>r phenomena include:<br />

he<strong>at</strong> transfer, flow <strong>of</strong> gases and solids through<br />

reactors, and changes in <strong>the</strong> solid structure, all <strong>of</strong> which affect <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

diffusion and surface area available for reaction. The reaction to be studied<br />

is <strong>the</strong> reaction between carbon and carbon dioxide to form carbon monoxide.<br />

This reaction is <strong>of</strong> importance for it is one o f <strong>the</strong> prime reactions occurring<br />

in <strong>coal</strong> gasifiers, and also it is a reaction on which <strong>the</strong>re is d<strong>at</strong>a from o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

investig<strong>at</strong>ions (1-17). Considerable discrepancy has been found for activ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

energies which ranges from 48-86 kcal/mol and for reaction r<strong>at</strong>e constants.<br />

This can be explained by <strong>the</strong> somewh<strong>at</strong> oversimplified view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mechanism which<br />

was thought to be r<strong>at</strong>e-controlling, and <strong>the</strong> simplific<strong>at</strong>ion made in <strong>the</strong> corres-<br />

ponding reaction r<strong>at</strong>e models.<br />

Gulbransen and Andrew (2) showed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> internal surface area <strong>of</strong> graphite<br />

increased during reaction with carbon dioxide and oxygen, Walker et al. (3)<br />

studied graphite rods for <strong>the</strong> possible correl<strong>at</strong>ions existing between reaction<br />

r<strong>at</strong>es and changes in surface area during reaction. They concluded th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

reaction develops new surface, to some extent, by enlarging <strong>the</strong> micropores<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solid but principally by opening up pore volume not previously available<br />

to reactant gas ei<strong>the</strong>r because <strong>the</strong> capillaries were too small or because existing<br />

pores were unconnected. Surface area increased up to a point where r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

production <strong>of</strong> new surface equalled <strong>the</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> old surface, after which<br />

surface area <strong>the</strong>n continued to decrease. For <strong>the</strong> graphite-carbon dioxide<br />

reaction, Petersen (4) found th<strong>at</strong> observed r<strong>at</strong>es were not simple functions <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> total available surface area as determined by low-temper<strong>at</strong>ure adsorptions<br />

prior to reaction, as might be expected if <strong>the</strong> reaction was chemical-reaction<br />

control 1 ed.<br />

31


Turkgodan et al. (18) studied <strong>the</strong> pore characteristics <strong>of</strong> several carbons,<br />

graphite, coke and char<strong>coal</strong>. They concluded thdt about 1/2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> volume is<br />

loc<strong>at</strong>ed in micropores and <strong>the</strong>refore not avdilable for reaction, Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

internal surface area was loc<strong>at</strong>ed in pores in <strong>the</strong> micropore range. The pore<br />

vol unie, pore surface area, and effective di ffusi vi ty increased with conversion<br />

during internal oxid<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

Dutta and Wen (16, 17) studied <strong>the</strong> reactivities <strong>of</strong> several raw <strong>coal</strong>s and<br />

chars. They noted a change in <strong>the</strong> actual pore structures <strong>of</strong> a few samples <strong>at</strong><br />

di Fferent conversions from scanning electron micrographs. A r<strong>at</strong>e equ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

was proposed th<strong>at</strong> incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> change <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ive available surface<br />

area during reaction. No measurements <strong>of</strong> this change were made. A r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

expression, which includes <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> a chemical and diffusion reaction<br />

controlling niechanisnis, is expressed<br />

where:<br />

c=<br />

dX<br />

dt rl s k c<br />

c02<br />

(l-xc)<br />

Xc is <strong>the</strong> conversion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solid<br />

S is <strong>the</strong> surface area available for reaction<br />

k is <strong>the</strong> reaction r<strong>at</strong>e constant<br />

rl is <strong>the</strong> effectiveness factor<br />

is <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> C02 in gas phase<br />

cco2<br />

t is time<br />

The effectiveness factor n is equal to <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction r<strong>at</strong>e under<br />

diffusion-controlled conditions to th<strong>at</strong> which would occur if <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> reactants were equal to <strong>the</strong> surface concentr<strong>at</strong>ion. For a first order diffu-<br />

sion-controlled reaction <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> pore-diffusion is given by equ<strong>at</strong>ion 2)<br />

where :<br />

S is <strong>the</strong> specific surface<br />

k is <strong>the</strong> reaction r<strong>at</strong>e constant<br />

rc is <strong>the</strong> radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particle<br />

De is <strong>the</strong> effective diffusivity<br />

The effectiveness factor n is a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effective modulus, $, which<br />

is dependent upon <strong>the</strong> effective diffusivity, D . The effective diffusivity<br />

and <strong>the</strong> surface area available for reaction chgnge during <strong>the</strong> reaction,<br />

32<br />

1)


I<br />

1<br />

This itidy be expressed as<br />

s = so f iXC)<br />

De = D h (X,)<br />

en<br />

5)<br />

where So and De are <strong>the</strong> available surface area and effective diffusivity<br />

<strong>at</strong> zero convers?on, and f(Xc) and h(Xc) are functions <strong>of</strong> conversion, Xc.<br />

deterillin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se changing parameters and <strong>the</strong>ir influence on <strong>the</strong><br />

overall reaction r<strong>at</strong>e is <strong>the</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this research.<br />

Effective Diffusi vi ty<br />

I. Theoretical Development <strong>of</strong> Model<br />

Experiinental determin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effective diffusivity in <strong>coal</strong> is performed<br />

in a packed bed <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> particles with a carrier gas flowing through <strong>the</strong><br />

bed. A pulse in <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adsorb<strong>at</strong>e gas is introduced<br />

<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> inlet <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> packed bed. The mass transfer characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> bed change <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pulse as it passes through <strong>the</strong> bed.<br />

<strong>the</strong>oretical model describing <strong>the</strong> mass transfer in <strong>the</strong> bed is used to<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> unsteady st<strong>at</strong>e concentr<strong>at</strong>ion response in <strong>the</strong> bed effluent to<br />

<strong>the</strong> original pulse input. By applying <strong>the</strong> model to <strong>the</strong> experimental d<strong>at</strong>a,<br />

<strong>the</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model are determined. The model describing <strong>the</strong> mass<br />

transfer in <strong>the</strong> packed bed consists <strong>of</strong> unsteady st<strong>at</strong>e m<strong>at</strong>erial balances<br />

in <strong>the</strong> packed bed and <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> particles. Equ<strong>at</strong>ions (6-14) describe <strong>the</strong><br />

mass transfer in <strong>the</strong> packed bed <strong>of</strong> particles and <strong>the</strong> boundary conditions.<br />

M<strong>at</strong>erial balance on <strong>coal</strong> particle<br />

Rel<strong>at</strong>i.on between adsorbed concentr<strong>at</strong>ion and concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> surface<br />

Boundary condi t<br />

ons<br />

q(rc, t) = KcC (rc. t)<br />

3 (0, t) = 0<br />

33<br />

4)<br />

A<br />

The


M<strong>at</strong>eridl balance on packed bed<br />

Boundary conditions<br />

11. Solution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Model<br />

r)<br />

Three altern<strong>at</strong>ive techniques for solution and subsequent parameter<br />

estim<strong>at</strong>ion from <strong>the</strong> model are curve fitting in <strong>the</strong> time domain, curve<br />

fitting in <strong>the</strong> Laplace or Fourier domain, and <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> moments.<br />

Moments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> response curve resulting from a pulse input can be solved<br />

analytically for <strong>the</strong> solution to <strong>the</strong> model in <strong>the</strong> Laplace domain. Parameter<br />

estim<strong>at</strong>ion is achieved by m<strong>at</strong>ching <strong>the</strong> measured moments with <strong>the</strong><br />

analytical expression for <strong>the</strong> moments. The method <strong>of</strong> moments was used in<br />

this work because it does not require a numerical solution to <strong>the</strong> model and<br />

because parameters estim<strong>at</strong>ion can be performed in <strong>the</strong> time domain. The<br />

Laplace transform is applied to <strong>the</strong> time variable in <strong>the</strong> equ<strong>at</strong>ions and<br />

boundary conditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model.<br />

A system <strong>of</strong> coupled ordinary differential<br />

equ<strong>at</strong>ions is obtained after applying this transform. A <strong>the</strong>orem rel<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

<strong>the</strong> transformed solution to <strong>the</strong> absolute and central moments <strong>of</strong> time<br />

domain solution is<br />

The nth absolute moment<br />

dn -<br />

M, = (-1)” lim - c (s, z)<br />

SO dsn<br />

is defined as:<br />

lq - -<br />

8 - Mn<br />

M =<br />

n<br />

0”<br />

The nth central moment is defined by:<br />

MO<br />

Applying equ<strong>at</strong>ion 15) to <strong>the</strong> transformed solution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model results<br />

in <strong>the</strong> following equ<strong>at</strong>ions for <strong>the</strong> first absolute and second central moments:<br />

34


I<br />

These two equ<strong>at</strong>ions rel<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> model parameters to <strong>the</strong> moments which can<br />

be calcul<strong>at</strong>ed from experimental d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

Experi!!iental<br />

WYODAK subbituminous <strong>coal</strong>, particle size 35 x 60, was used in <strong>the</strong><br />

experimental study. The experimental system consisted <strong>of</strong> a pulse reactor,<br />

Figure 1, a flow type BET appar<strong>at</strong>us, Figure 2, and <strong>the</strong> chrom<strong>at</strong>ographic<br />

appar<strong>at</strong>us, Figure 3. This allowed determin<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> surface area and<br />

effective diffusivity to be made in conjunction with reaction studies<br />

without removing <strong>the</strong> sample.<br />

Measurements <strong>of</strong> surface area and effective diffusivi ty were made on raw<br />

<strong>coal</strong>s. Surface area measurements were made by adsorbing carbon dioxide<br />

<strong>at</strong> 195 K for 30 minutes. The single point BET method was used for evalu<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface area. The raw <strong>coal</strong>s were devol<strong>at</strong>ilized by he<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>at</strong><br />

SoC/min to a temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> 8OO0C to produce a <strong>coal</strong> char. Changes in surface<br />

area and effective diffusivity were again detprmined. The <strong>coal</strong> char<br />

was <strong>the</strong>n partially reacted <strong>at</strong> a temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> 800 C by injecting a known<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide. Changes in surface area and effective diffusivity<br />

were again determined. This procedure was repe<strong>at</strong>ed until <strong>the</strong> conversion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carbon in <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> approached 1.0.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion caused structural changes which are reflected in an<br />

average weight loss <strong>of</strong> 41% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> initial weight, a decrease in <strong>the</strong> diffusion<br />

coefficient, and an increase in total surface area. Table 1 gives<br />

<strong>the</strong>se changes for three WYOOAK samples. The increase in surface area represents<br />

<strong>the</strong> opening <strong>of</strong> pores which were not accessible before devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Walls closing <strong>of</strong>f pores are devol<strong>at</strong>ilized and small pores inaccessible to<br />

<strong>the</strong> initial CO adsorption are enlarged because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile<br />

m<strong>at</strong>erial durin5 <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ing, This new pore structure has a gre<strong>at</strong>er resistance<br />

to diffusion, seen as a decrease in <strong>the</strong> diffusion coefficient. The<br />

small pores and enlarged pore form a more complex network <strong>of</strong> voids within<br />

<strong>the</strong> particles.<br />

increase in total available surface area and a decrease in <strong>the</strong> diffusion<br />

coef f i ci ent .<br />

The heterogeneous chemical reaction causes continuous changes in <strong>the</strong> pore<br />

structure due to <strong>the</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> carbon. Pore walls are being gasified<br />

slowly as <strong>the</strong> reaction continues toward completton. The continually<br />

changing internal structure affects <strong>the</strong> diffusion <strong>of</strong> gaseous reactants<br />

and products to and from <strong>the</strong> active carbon sites within <strong>the</strong> particle.<br />

19)<br />

The production <strong>of</strong> char by devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion causes an<br />

35


These phenomena iiiay be described by examining Figure 4 which is a plot<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> diffusion coefficient d<strong>at</strong>a for <strong>the</strong> three WYODAK samples measured<br />

<strong>at</strong> various carbon conversions, The diffusion coefficient increases slowly<br />

<strong>at</strong> low conversion and is soinewhdt stable during <strong>the</strong> mid-range <strong>of</strong> conversion,<br />

but increases very quickly as <strong>the</strong> reaction nears completion. Overall <strong>the</strong><br />

diffusion coefficient increases as carbon conversion inreases.<br />

can be correl<strong>at</strong>ed by<br />

These d<strong>at</strong>a (<br />

- DC = (0.06) exp (1.7 . Xc)<br />

r C<br />

which gave an index <strong>of</strong> determin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> 0.88. Physically, <strong>the</strong> pore<br />

structure after devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion consists <strong>of</strong> a small amount <strong>of</strong> void, charac-<br />

teristic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> low diffusion coefficient which means th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> resistance to<br />

diffusion is substantial. During reaction <strong>the</strong>se pores gradually enlarge due<br />

to gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carbon. Therefore as conversion increases <strong>the</strong> pore<br />

volume or void increases resulting in less resistance to diffusion, which<br />

is reflected by <strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong> diffusion coefficient.<br />

The CD2-char reaction occurs <strong>at</strong> active carbon sites upon <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> char<br />

surface. Thus <strong>the</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactant carbon will affect <strong>the</strong> total<br />

surface area. The total surface area decreases for <strong>the</strong>se WYODAK samples<br />

as <strong>the</strong> carbon conversion increases, Figure 5. As conversion goes toward<br />

completion, pore walls which are measured as surface area are gasified<br />

or consumed by <strong>the</strong> reaction causing a decrease in total surface area.<br />

Figure 5 shows <strong>the</strong> specific surface area versus <strong>the</strong> carbon conversion.<br />

The specific surface area first goes through a minimum <strong>at</strong> low carbon con-<br />

versions and <strong>the</strong>n a maximum as carbon conversion goes toward completion.<br />

Mahajan and Walker (19) predicted <strong>the</strong> maximum in <strong>the</strong>ir qualit<strong>at</strong>ive descrip-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction process. Dutta and Wen (16) found th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e reaches amaximum <strong>at</strong> a carbon conversion <strong>of</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 0.2 for reac-<br />

tions carried out <strong>at</strong> low temper<strong>at</strong>ures. In an <strong>at</strong>tempt to correl<strong>at</strong>e this d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

<strong>the</strong>y assumed a reaction r<strong>at</strong>e model, Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 1). for <strong>the</strong> chemical controlled<br />

regime. They incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed into <strong>the</strong> model a proposed function <strong>of</strong> conversion<br />

which describes changes in surface area.<br />

a = 1 2 100 x"," exp (-Bx,-)<br />

where a equals <strong>the</strong> specific surface area divided by <strong>the</strong> initial specific<br />

surface area. Fitting <strong>the</strong> model to <strong>the</strong> reaction r<strong>at</strong>e versus conversion<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a <strong>the</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed function were estim<strong>at</strong>ed by Dutta and<br />

Wen (16). This function describing changes in specific surface area<br />

exhibits a maximum <strong>at</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely <strong>the</strong> same conversion as our d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

At low temper<strong>at</strong>ures where reaction r<strong>at</strong>e is predominantly chemically<br />

controlled, <strong>the</strong> maximum in <strong>the</strong> reaction r<strong>at</strong>e vs. conversion d<strong>at</strong>a can be<br />

36<br />

21 1<br />

!


explained by <strong>the</strong> fact th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> specific surface for chemical reaction<br />

also goes through a maximum and this behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specific area has<br />

been experimentally confirmed. The problem with equ<strong>at</strong>ion 22) is th<strong>at</strong> it<br />

predicts ei<strong>the</strong>r a maximum or minimum for <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> a, but not both.<br />

In a recent paper Bh<strong>at</strong>ia and Perlmuter (20), using a random pore model<br />

have derived an expression for surface area as a function <strong>of</strong> converslon<br />

where L , S and E are <strong>the</strong> initial total pore length, surface area<br />

to volu8e rstio, a8d porosity respectively. This equ<strong>at</strong>ion correl<strong>at</strong>es<br />

our d<strong>at</strong>a predicting both a minimum and maximum in values <strong>of</strong> specific<br />

surface area, Figure 6.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

This work was supported by a N<strong>at</strong>ional Science Found<strong>at</strong>ion Research<br />

Institution Grant, Eng. 7907988.<br />

References<br />

Gadsby, J., Long, F. J.. Sleighthom, P., and Sykes, K. W.,<br />

"The Mechanism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Carbon Dioxide Reaction," Proc. Roy.<br />

SOC, London, Ser. A, 193, 377 (1948).<br />

Gulbransen, E. A., and Andrew, K. F., "Reaction <strong>of</strong> Carbon Dioxide<br />

with Pure Artificial Graphite <strong>at</strong> Temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> 5OO0C," Ind. Eng.<br />

-- Chem., 44, 1039 (1952).\<br />

Walker, P. L., Foresti, R. J. and Wright, C. C., "Surface Area<br />

Studies <strong>of</strong> Carbon-Carbon Dioxide Reaction," Ind. Eng. Chem.,<br />

- 45, 8, 1703 (1953).<br />

Petersen, E. E., Walker, P. L. and Wright, C. C., "Surface Area<br />

Development Within Artificial Graphite Rods Reacted with Carbon<br />

Dioxide from 900°C to 1300oC," Ind. Eng. Chem., 47, 1629 (1955).<br />

Wicke. E., "Fifth Symposium on Combustion," p. 245, Reinhold,<br />

New York, New York (1955).<br />

Rossberg, V. M., and Wicke, E., "Transportvogage and Oberflachem-<br />

reaktionen bei der Verbrennung Graphi ti schen Kohlenst<strong>of</strong>f ,I' Chem. Ing.<br />

Tech., 28, 191 (1956).<br />

Ergun, S., "Kinetics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reaction <strong>of</strong> Carbon Dioxide with Carbon,"<br />

J. Phys. Chem., 60, 480 (1956).<br />

37


Walker, P. L., Rusinko, F., and Austin, L. G., "Gas Reactions<br />

Carbon," Advances in C<strong>at</strong>alysis, Vol. XI, 133-221 (1959).<br />

Austin, L. G. and Walker, P. L., "Effect <strong>of</strong> Carbon Monoxide in<br />

Causing Nonuniforni Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Graphite by Carbon Dioxide,"<br />

AIChE Journal, 9, 303 (1963).<br />

Turkdogan, E. T., Kaoump, V., Vinters, J. V., "R<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Oxid<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Graphite in Carbon Dioxide," Carbon, 5, 467 (1968).<br />

Turkdogan, E. T., Vinters, J. V., "Kinetics <strong>of</strong> Oxid<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

Graphite and Char<strong>coal</strong> in C02," Carbon, 7, 101 (1969).<br />

Yoshida, K., and Kinii, D., "Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Porous Carbon by<br />

Carbon Dioxides," J. Chem. Engr., Japan, 2, 170 (1969).<br />

Wen, C. Y., and Wy, N. T., "An Analysis <strong>of</strong> Slow Reactions in a<br />

Porous Particle," AIChE Journal, 20, 5, 833-840 (1974).<br />

Walker, P. L, and Hippo, E., "Reactivity <strong>of</strong> He<strong>at</strong>-Tre<strong>at</strong>ed Coals<br />

in Carbon Dioxide <strong>at</strong> 900°C," m, 54, 245 (1975).<br />

Fuchs, W., Yavarsky, P. M., "Am. Chem. SOC., Div. Fuel Chem. ,"<br />

20 (3), 115, (1975).<br />

Dutta, S., Wen, C. Y., "Reactivity <strong>of</strong> Coal and Char. 2. In<br />

Oxygen-Nitrogen Atmosphere," Ind. Eng. Chem.,<br />

- 16, No. 1, 20 (1977).<br />

Process Des. Dev.,<br />

Dutta, S., Wen, C. Y., "Reactivity <strong>of</strong> Coal and Char, 2. In<br />

Oxygen-Ni trogen Atmosphere ," Ind. Eng , Chem., Process Des. Dev.,<br />

- 16, No. 1, 31 (1977).<br />

Turkdogan, E. T., Olsson, R. G., and Vinters, J, V,, "Pore<br />

Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Carbon ," Carbon, 8, 545-564 (1970).<br />

Mahajan, A. P., Yarzab, R., and Walker, P. L., Jr,, "Unific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Coal-Char Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion Reaction Mechanisms,'' w, Vol. 57,<br />

pp. 643-646, October 1978.<br />

Bh<strong>at</strong>ia, S. K. and Perlmutter, D. D,, "A Randoni Pore Model for Fluid<br />

Solid Reactions: I. Iso<strong>the</strong>rnal, Kinetic Control", AIChE J.,<br />

- 26, NO. 3, 379-385 (1980).<br />

38<br />

I


TI<br />

39


-""I-<br />

*I,".. I Dlrf".,on Co.1flcl.n. ....<br />

". Car.r.9""<br />

40


AN ENTRAINED FLOW REACTOR WITH IN SITU FTIR ANALYSIS*<br />

Peter R. Solomon and David G. Hamblen<br />

Advanced Fuel Research, Inc. 87 Church St., East Hartford, CT 06108<br />

I<br />

\ INTRODUCTION<br />

\<br />

I<br />

A key element in predicting <strong>coal</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion behavior is pyrolysis. This is <strong>the</strong><br />

initial step in gasific<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>the</strong> step which controls <strong>the</strong> amount and physical<br />

Structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> char and <strong>the</strong> step which is most dependent on <strong>the</strong> <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>coal</strong>. Recent reviews <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> pyrolysis (1,2,3) conclude th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> pyrolysis product<br />

distribution and apparent kinetic r<strong>at</strong>es vary widely with <strong>the</strong> experimental<br />

measurement. It is clear th<strong>at</strong> to establish a true predictive capability additional<br />

work is needed to understand pyrolysis reactions and define usable r<strong>at</strong>es.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> experiments which have been useful in investig<strong>at</strong>ing pyrolysis have been<br />

<strong>the</strong> captive sample he<strong>at</strong>ed grid devices which have achieved good mass and elemental<br />

balances and have provided d<strong>at</strong>a on individual species evolution (4-16). However,<br />

<strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> is slower than in practical devices so th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> kinetic d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

is <strong>of</strong> limited value.<br />

Entrained flow reactors which provide more realistic particle he<strong>at</strong>ing have been<br />

employed to study pyrolysis weight loss but have not provided much species evolution<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a (17-23). New visual d<strong>at</strong>a on pyrolysis behavior have been obtained in reactors<br />

with optical access (24, 25). These reactors employ fl<strong>at</strong> flame burners into which<br />

<strong>coal</strong> may be injected.<br />

This paper reports on a new appar<strong>at</strong>us which has been designed to combine <strong>the</strong><br />

advantages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactors described above. The new reactor: 1) injects <strong>coal</strong> into a<br />

prehe<strong>at</strong>ed gas stream in a hot furnace to provide rapid particle he<strong>at</strong>ing, 2) provides<br />

for optical access, 3) employs an FTIR for species concentr<strong>at</strong>ion measurements, both<br />

in-situ and in an external cell and 4 ) has provisions for obtaining mass balances.<br />

The reactor will be used in a program to study pyrolysis and secondary reactions <strong>of</strong><br />

interest in gasific<strong>at</strong>ion. The results will be used to test <strong>the</strong> conclusions <strong>of</strong> a<br />

previously developed pyrolysis model (11-15, 26-29) and fill in needed kinetic d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

The paper describes <strong>the</strong> reactor, reports preliminary results obtained with four<br />

<strong>coal</strong>s <strong>at</strong> furnace temper<strong>at</strong>ures from 700°C to 1200°C and assesses how <strong>the</strong>se results<br />

compare to d<strong>at</strong>a obtained in o<strong>the</strong>r experiments.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

The reactor has been designed to study <strong>coal</strong> behavior under conditions <strong>of</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

and he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e encountered in an entrained flow gasifier. The schem<strong>at</strong>ic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

experiment is presented in Fig. 1. A gas stream <strong>of</strong> predetermined composition is<br />

he<strong>at</strong>ed during transit through a bed <strong>of</strong> alumina chips maintained <strong>at</strong> furnace<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure. (Prior to he<strong>at</strong>ing, <strong>the</strong> gas composition can be analyzed by routing <strong>the</strong><br />

stream through an infrared cell). The gas stream <strong>the</strong>n enters a test section,<br />

maintained <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> furnace temper<strong>at</strong>ure, where <strong>coal</strong> is introduced through a w<strong>at</strong>er<br />

cooled injector. The <strong>coal</strong> is fed using a modific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a MIT entrainment system<br />

(30). In <strong>the</strong> modified system, <strong>the</strong> feeder tube, which extends up through <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

bed, is slowly lowered as <strong>the</strong> entrainment gas (injected above <strong>the</strong> bed) exits through<br />

<strong>the</strong> tube. When <strong>the</strong> tube feeder entrance is <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed, <strong>coal</strong> is<br />

entrained in <strong>the</strong> gas and enters <strong>the</strong> tube. The r<strong>at</strong>e for <strong>coal</strong> feeding is controlled<br />

by <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>at</strong> which <strong>the</strong> tube is lowered.<br />

* This program was initi<strong>at</strong>ed under EPRI contract #RP 1654-8. The program<br />

scope is currently being expanded under contract #DE AC01-81FE05122 from <strong>the</strong><br />

US Department <strong>of</strong> Energy.<br />

41


After a variable residence time, <strong>the</strong> reacting stream passes optical access ports and<br />

immedi<strong>at</strong>ely downstream is quenched in a w<strong>at</strong>er cooled collector. There are five ?<br />

optical access ports, two <strong>of</strong> which are presently employed for <strong>the</strong> FTIR beam. The<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r three ports are available for additional diagnostics. The quenched stream <strong>of</strong> I<br />

char, tar and gases enters a cyclone designed to separ<strong>at</strong>e particles larger than 4<br />

microns (31) and <strong>the</strong>n enters a series <strong>of</strong> filters to remove and sample <strong>the</strong> tar and (<br />

soot. The clean gas stream <strong>the</strong>n enters <strong>the</strong> room temper<strong>at</strong>ure FTIR cell which<br />

/<br />

provides a longer p<strong>at</strong>h length for higher sensitivity analysis. The particle<br />

residence time can be varied from 0 to 700 msec and <strong>the</strong> furnace has been designed to<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>e up to 1650’C.<br />

The FTIR can quantit<strong>at</strong>ively determine many gas species observed in <strong>coal</strong> pyrolysis<br />

including CO, CO , H20, CH4, CZH2, C H4, C2H6, C4H8s C6H6, NH3, HCN,<br />

SO2, COS, CS ani heavy paraffins an% olefins. C$Et’i:ikment can take spectra<br />

2<br />

every 80 msec to follow rapid changes in <strong>the</strong> reactor or co-add spectra for long<br />

periods <strong>of</strong> steady st<strong>at</strong>e flow to increase signal to noise. FTIR is well suited to<br />

in-situ furnace experiments since <strong>the</strong> FTIR system oper<strong>at</strong>es by coding <strong>the</strong> infrared<br />

source with an amplitude modul<strong>at</strong>ion which is unique to each infrared frequency. The<br />

detector is sensitive to <strong>the</strong> modul<strong>at</strong>ed radi<strong>at</strong>ion so th<strong>at</strong> unmodul<strong>at</strong>ed stray radi<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

is elimin<strong>at</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> experiment.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> work described below, experiments were run for <strong>the</strong> four <strong>coal</strong>s listed in<br />

Table 1. The <strong>coal</strong>s were sieved to produce a -200, +325 mesh size cut. The <strong>coal</strong> was<br />

fed <strong>at</strong> 2.4 grams/min. Helium was used for both <strong>the</strong> prehe<strong>at</strong>ed gas and <strong>the</strong><br />

entrainment gas.<br />

The prehe<strong>at</strong>ed gas was fed <strong>at</strong> r<strong>at</strong>es between 40 and 25 l/min<br />

depending on temper<strong>at</strong>ure to provide a gas velocity <strong>of</strong> 1 m/sec within <strong>the</strong> furnace.<br />

The entrainment gas was fed <strong>at</strong> 1.2 l/min. Infrared spectra were obtained with a<br />

Nicolet model 7199 FTIR using a globar source and a mercury-cadmium telluride<br />

detector. For obtaining <strong>the</strong> spectra within <strong>the</strong> furnace and within <strong>the</strong> cell, 100<br />

scans <strong>at</strong> 0.5 wavenumber resolutions were accumul<strong>at</strong>ed in 140 seconds and transformed<br />

in under 2 minutes.<br />

TABLE I<br />

COALS USED IN THE ENTRAINED FLOW REACTOR STUDY<br />

COAL TYPE UT% (DAF)<br />

c H N S 0 ASH (Dry)<br />

Savage Montana Lignite 71.2 4.6 1.1 1.3 21.8 10.6<br />

Jacobs Ranch Wyom. Scbbituminous 74.3 5.2 1.1 .6 18.8 7.8<br />

Illinois P6 Bituminous 73.9 5.1 1.4 4.2 15.4 11.0<br />

Pittsburgh 18 Bituminous 83.5 5.5 1.6 3.3 6.1 9.2<br />

Gas Analysis in <strong>the</strong> Furnace<br />

Figure 2 shows <strong>the</strong> in-situ gas analysis. There is an acceptable noise level and no<br />

drastic effects from <strong>the</strong> particle sc<strong>at</strong>tering. The analyses are for <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

injector <strong>at</strong> positions from 5 to 66 cm above <strong>the</strong> optical port. The species which can<br />

easily be seen are CO, C02, H20, CH , C2H2, C H and heavy paraffins. Additional<br />

species could be observed through tke use <strong>of</strong> to4;ware signal enhancement techniques<br />

which can be used to detect species whose absorption lines are smaller than <strong>the</strong><br />

noise (32). These techniques consider all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> absorption lines for a species,<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than a single line.<br />

42<br />

1<br />

I


m<br />

'<br />

'<br />

\<br />

FTIR spectra obtained directly within <strong>the</strong> hot furnace allows <strong>the</strong> observ<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

heavy products such as tar which don't appear in <strong>the</strong> gas phase <strong>at</strong> room temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

and provide a means to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r reactions occur during <strong>the</strong> quenching and<br />

sampling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas stream. The in-situ observ<strong>at</strong>ion also permits gas temper<strong>at</strong>ures<br />

to be measured as described below.<br />

' Temper<strong>at</strong>ure Measurements by FTIR<br />

It appears possible to use <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>ios <strong>of</strong> lines from a given species to determine gas<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ures in <strong>the</strong> furnace. As <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> a gas changes, <strong>the</strong> popul<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

in its higher energy levels increases. In terms <strong>of</strong> its absorption spectrum, this<br />

generally means th<strong>at</strong> more absorption lines are visible. The effect is illustr<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

in Fig. 3 which compares CO spectra <strong>at</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures. The energy is<br />

clearly shifted from <strong>the</strong> central lines toward <strong>the</strong> wings as <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

increases. Lines <strong>at</strong> 2250 and 2000 cm-l which are too small to be observed <strong>at</strong> room<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure are clearly visible <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> higher temper<strong>at</strong>ures. The r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

lines to <strong>the</strong> lines <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution can be used to determine<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

Gas Analysis in a Cell<br />

Figure 4 shows <strong>the</strong> gas analysis from <strong>the</strong> room temper<strong>at</strong>ure cell. This cell was<br />

filled with <strong>the</strong> effluent gas stream from <strong>the</strong> furnace after passing through <strong>the</strong><br />

cyclone and filter. The cell provides higher sensitivity detection because <strong>the</strong> p<strong>at</strong>h<br />

length is about 12 times longer than in <strong>the</strong> furnace. The spectra compare <strong>the</strong><br />

pyrolysis gases from Jacobs Ranch <strong>coal</strong> injected <strong>at</strong> 66 cm above <strong>the</strong> optical port <strong>at</strong><br />

furnace temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> 800 and 1200°C. Important differences in <strong>the</strong> product mix <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se two temper<strong>at</strong>ures cap be observed. The top pair <strong>of</strong> spectra show <strong>the</strong> region<br />

between 3500 and 2800 cm- . At 1200°C <strong>the</strong>re is HCN, C2H2 and CH . At 800°C <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is less methane and little HCN or C H but significant amounts 04 ethane and heavy<br />

paraffins (indic<strong>at</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> broad bzczground). This observ<strong>at</strong>ion is consistent with<br />

<strong>the</strong> cracking <strong>of</strong> paraffins to form olefins, acetylene and soot which has been<br />

discussed previously (12,14). The region between 2600 and 1900 cm-' shows <strong>the</strong> CO<br />

2<br />

and CO. The CO increases by 50% but <strong>the</strong> CO increases by a factor <strong>of</strong> 3 in going from<br />

800'C to 1200"6. This is consistent with previous observ<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> low temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

production <strong>of</strong> C02 and high temper<strong>at</strong>ure production <strong>of</strong> CO (11-15). The evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

CO and CO may be rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> early disappearance <strong>of</strong> carboxyl groups and <strong>the</strong><br />

regention <strong>of</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r lingages observed in <strong>the</strong> infrared spectra <strong>of</strong> chars discussed<br />

below. The region betwe n 1800 and 1200 cm- shows w<strong>at</strong>er and methane. The region<br />

between 1200 and 500 cm-e shows olefins, acetylene, HCN and C02. The ethylene and<br />

heavier olefins are lower and acetylene is higher <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> higher temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

(consistent with cracking <strong>of</strong> olefins to form acetylene and soot).<br />

A comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pyrolysis gas composition from different <strong>coal</strong>s is presented in<br />

Fig. 5. The <strong>coal</strong>s were all injected <strong>at</strong> 66 cm above <strong>the</strong> optical window <strong>at</strong> a furnace<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> 800'C. The spectra show <strong>the</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ion with rank which has<br />

been discussed previously (11-15). The low rank <strong>coal</strong>s, which are high in <strong>the</strong> oxygen<br />

functional groups, produce pyrolysis gases which are high in <strong>the</strong> oxygen containing<br />

species, CO, C02 and H 0. The higher rank <strong>coal</strong>s, which are higher in aliph<strong>at</strong>ic<br />

functional groups, yiefd higher concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> hydrocarbons.<br />

D<strong>at</strong>a <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kind illustr<strong>at</strong>ed above were collected <strong>at</strong> several reaction distances <strong>at</strong><br />

Curves <strong>of</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion vs reaction distance differed among <strong>the</strong> species.<br />

On a normalized basis, however, <strong>the</strong>se curves were similar for <strong>the</strong> various <strong>coal</strong>s even<br />

though <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion varied from <strong>coal</strong> to <strong>coal</strong>. This result is also in agreement<br />

with earlier work (11-15).<br />

800'C .<br />

43


Changes in Char Chemistry<br />

The infrared spectra <strong>of</strong> chars provide a convenient means <strong>of</strong> monitoring <strong>the</strong> chemical<br />

changes occurring during <strong>the</strong> pyrolysis process. The changes in functional group<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ion can be correl<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> gas species to determine <strong>the</strong><br />

sources for <strong>the</strong> species. FTIR spectra <strong>of</strong> chars from pyrolyzing Jacobs Ranch Coal <strong>at</strong><br />

800°C are shown in Fig. 6. The techniques for preparing, drying and making<br />

sc<strong>at</strong>tering corrections hav been discussed previously (13, 33). The ali h<strong>at</strong>ic<br />

groups (peak near 2900 and carboxyl groups (shoulder near 1650 cm *) are<br />

observed to decrease with reaction distance. The hydroxyl groups (broad peak<br />

between 3500 and 2500 cm-1) also decrease although not as rapidly. As <strong>the</strong> residence<br />

dis ance (and time) is increased, <strong>the</strong> char arom<strong>at</strong>ic hydrogen peaks near 800 an? 3100<br />

cm-' are observed to increase. The 0-C bond concentr<strong>at</strong>ion (peak near 1200 cm- )<br />

shows little change. These changes in <strong>the</strong> functional group concentr<strong>at</strong>ions during<br />

pyrolysis are in agreement with results from earlier experiments (14, 15, 21). The<br />

changes in char chemistry will be correl<strong>at</strong>ed with evolution <strong>of</strong> gas species and<br />

compared with <strong>the</strong> pyrolysis model predictions.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Preliminary results have been obtained in a newly constructed Entrained Flow reactor<br />

with on-line in-situ analysis by FTIR. These results indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong>:<br />

1. Gas concentr<strong>at</strong>ion measurements for CO, C02, w<strong>at</strong>er, methane, acetylene, ethylene<br />

and heavy paraffins can be routinely made in a hot furnace with an FTIR.<br />

2. Gas temper<strong>at</strong>ure measurements appear feasible using r<strong>at</strong>ios <strong>of</strong> CO lines.<br />

3. On-line gas analysis in an external gas cell is also extremely effective,<br />

Several observ<strong>at</strong>ions which have previously been reported for o<strong>the</strong>r pyrolysis<br />

experiments appear to be supported by <strong>the</strong> preliminary d<strong>at</strong>a. These are:<br />

1. Gas kinetics appear to be rel<strong>at</strong>ively insensitive to <strong>coal</strong> rank.<br />

2. The gas composition varies sytem<strong>at</strong>ically with <strong>the</strong> functional group composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

3. There is temper<strong>at</strong>ure dependent cracking <strong>of</strong> paraffins to form olefins and<br />

acetylene and olefins to form acetylene.<br />

4. Functional groups in <strong>the</strong> chars disappear in <strong>the</strong> following order: First<br />

aliph<strong>at</strong>ics, <strong>the</strong>n hydroxyl, and <strong>the</strong>n arom<strong>at</strong>ic hydrogen and e<strong>the</strong>r linkages. The<br />

present results show th<strong>at</strong> carboxyl groups also disappear quickly.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

The authors would like to thank N. Y. Nsakala, G. J. Goetz, R. W. Seeker and R. C.<br />

Flagan for <strong>the</strong>ir advice on various details <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactor and acknowledge <strong>the</strong> able<br />

technical assistance <strong>of</strong> R. M. Carangelo in running <strong>the</strong> experiments. The authors<br />

also express <strong>the</strong>ir appreci<strong>at</strong>ion for <strong>the</strong> encouragement given to this program by J.<br />

Yerushalmi, George Quentin and Leonard Naphtali.<br />

44


!I<br />

I<br />

)<br />

I<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Howard, J. B., Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Coal Pyrolysis and Hydropyrolysis, in Chemistry<br />

Of Coal Utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion. Second supplementary volume. Martin A. Elliot, Editor,<br />

Wiley, pg. 665 (1981).<br />

2. Howard, J. B., Peters, W. A. and Serio, M. A., Coal Devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Inform<strong>at</strong>ion for Reactor Modeling. EPRI report AP-1803, April, (1981).<br />

3.<br />

Anthony, D. B. and Howard, J. B., Am. Inst. Chern. Eng. J. 22. 625 (1976).<br />

4. Anthony, D. B., Howard, J. B., Meissner, H. P. and Hottel, H. G.. Rev. Sci.<br />

Instrum., 41, Pg. 992 (1974).<br />

5. Anthony, D. B., Howard, J. B., Meissner, H. P. and Hottel, H. G., Fifteenth<br />

Symposium (Intern<strong>at</strong>ional) on Combustion, p. 1303, The Combustion Institute,<br />

Pittsburgh, PA (1975).<br />

6. Suuberg, E. M., Rapid Pyrolysis and Hydropyrolysis <strong>of</strong> Coal, Ph.D Thesis. MIT<br />

(1977).<br />

7. Suuberg, E. M., Peters, W. A. and Howard, J. B., Ind. Eng. Process Des. Dev.,<br />

- 17, #l, p. 37 (1978).<br />

8. Suuberg, E. M., Peters, W. A. and Howard, J. B., Seventeenth Symposium<br />

(Intern<strong>at</strong>ional) on Combustion, p. 117, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh,<br />

PA, (1979).<br />

9. Juntgen, H. and van Heek, K. H., Fuel Processing Technology, 2, 26 (1979.<br />

10. Gavalas, G. R. and Oka, M., Fuel 2, 285 (1972).<br />

11. Solomon, P. R. and Colket, M. B., 17th Symposium (Intern<strong>at</strong>ional) on Combustion,<br />

p. 131, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1979).<br />

12. Solomon, P. R., ACS Div. Of Fuel Chemistry Preprints, 14, #3, 154 (1979).<br />

13. Solomon, P. R., In Coal Structure, Advances in Chemistry Series, 192, page 95<br />

(1981).<br />

14. Solomon, P. R. and Hamblen, D. G., Understanding Coal Using Thermal<br />

Decomposition and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Conference on <strong>the</strong> Chemistry and Physics <strong>of</strong> Coal Utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion, Morgantown, WV,<br />

June 2-4 (1980).<br />

15. Solomon, P. R., Hamblen, D. G. and Carangelo, R. M., Coal Pyrolysis, AIChE,<br />

Symposium on Coal Pyrolysis (Nov., 1981).<br />

16.<br />

Solomon, P. R. and Colket, M. B., Fuel, 7, 749 (1978).<br />

17. Badzioch, S. and Hawksley, P. G. W., Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 9, 521<br />

(1970).<br />

18. Nsakala, N. Y., Essenhigh, R. H. and Walker, P. L., Jr., Combustion Science<br />

Technol., 16, 153 (1977).<br />

19. Kobayashi, H., Devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Pulverized Coal <strong>at</strong> High Temper<strong>at</strong>ures,<br />

Ph.D. <strong>the</strong>sis, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Eng., Mass. Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology,<br />

Cambridge, MA (1976).<br />

45


20.<br />

21.<br />

22.<br />

23.<br />

24.<br />

25.<br />

26.<br />

27.<br />

28.<br />

29.<br />

30.<br />

31.<br />

32.<br />

33.<br />

Kobayashi, H., Howard, J. B. and Sar<strong>of</strong>im, A. F., Sixteenth Symposium<br />

(Intern<strong>at</strong>ional) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 411,<br />

(1977).<br />

Solomon, P. R., Hamblen, D. G., Goetz. G. J. and Nsakala, N. Y., ACS Div. <strong>of</strong><br />

Fuel Chemistry Preprints, 2, 83 (1981).<br />

Ubhayaker, S. K., Stickler, D. B., von Rosenberg, Jr., C. W. and Gannon, R. E.,<br />

16th Symposium (Intern<strong>at</strong>ional) Combustion, Combustion Inst., Pittsburgh, PA<br />

p. 427, (1977).<br />

Scaroni, A. W., Walker, Jr., P. L. and Essenhigh, R. H., Fuel, 60 71 (1981)<br />

McLean, W. J., Hardesty, D. R. and Pohl, J. H., 18th Symposium (Intern<strong>at</strong>ional),<br />

on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA p. 1239 (1981).<br />

Samuelson, G. S., Trolinger, J. D., Heap, M. P. and Seeker, W. R., Combust.<br />

Flame 2, 13 (1980).<br />

Solomon, P. R., Fuel, 60, 3 (1981).<br />

Solomon, P. R., Hobbs. R. H., Hamblen, D. G., Chen, W. Y., La Cava, A. and<br />

Graff, R. S., Fuel, 60, 342 (1981).<br />

Solomon, P. R., Coal Structure and Thermal Decomposition, ACS Symposium Series,<br />

(In Press).<br />

Solomon, P. R., Characteriz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Coal and Coal Thermal Decomposition,<br />

Chapter 111 <strong>of</strong> EPA Monograph on Coal Combustion, (In Press).<br />

Mims, C. A., Neville, M., Quann, R. and Sar<strong>of</strong>im, A., Labor<strong>at</strong>ory Study <strong>of</strong> Trace<br />

Element Transform<strong>at</strong>ion During Coal Combustion, presented <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> N<strong>at</strong>ional 87th<br />

AIChE Meeting, Boston, MA, Aug. 19-22 (1979).<br />

John, W. and Reischl, G., A Cyclone for Size-Selective Sampling <strong>of</strong> Ambient Air,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Air Pollution Control Assoc., 872 (1980).<br />

Haaland, D. M., Easterling. R. G., Applied Spectroscopy, 2, P5, 539 (1980)<br />

Solomon, P. R. and Carangelo, R. M., FTIR Analysis <strong>of</strong> Coal: I. Techniques and<br />

Determin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Hydroxyl Concentr<strong>at</strong>ions, submitted to Fuel (1981).<br />

46


M, "0 "W w<br />

I1<br />

Figure 1. Entrained Flow Reactor.<br />

47


0s-a 00-a OS'S 00-E os-2 00-2 02.1<br />

33NtJEItlUSBtl<br />

..I<br />

00'1 os- 00' N<br />

i<br />

I


OS'I 00'<br />

0<br />

13<br />

ID<br />

N<br />

13 0<br />

N<br />

m<br />

0<br />

D<br />

0<br />

m<br />

0<br />

E<br />

m<br />

0<br />

0<br />

m<br />

0<br />

0<br />

3<br />

m<br />

u<br />

0<br />

2<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

a<br />

l---k--<br />

OO'E 00'<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

: i<br />

0<br />

D,<br />

N<br />

0<br />

0<br />

N<br />

N ~i<br />

0<br />

0<br />

m<br />

N<br />

3<br />

9<br />

N<br />

0 0<br />

-.<br />

OS'I 00' OS'I 00' -<br />

33NYBtlOSBtl<br />

49


COAL PYROLYSIS AT HIGH TEMPERATURES AND PRESSURES<br />

S. S. Tamhankar, J. T. Sears and C. Y. Wen<br />

Dept. <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, W.Va. 26506<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In <strong>coal</strong> conversion processes, such as combustion or high-temper<strong>at</strong>ure gasifica-<br />

tion, <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> pyrolysis is an important parameter which is affected by tem-<br />

per<strong>at</strong>ure. Increasing amounts <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> converted directly to gaseous species would<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> remaining m<strong>at</strong>erial which must be converted by <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ively slow char-<br />

gas reactions. Studies on this aspect, particularly <strong>at</strong> pressure and high tempera-<br />

tures, are scarce.<br />

ASTM standard methods obtain <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> converted to vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter<br />

<strong>at</strong> low temper<strong>at</strong>ures, slow he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>es and long exposure times. O<strong>the</strong>r procedures<br />

have generally used ei<strong>the</strong>r direct electric-resistance he<strong>at</strong>ing (1, 2) or a laminar-<br />

flow furnace (3, 4, 5, 6) to obtain high he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>es and high temper<strong>at</strong>ures.<br />

Menster et al. (1) and Kobayashi et <strong>at</strong>. (6) have indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure affects <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> pyrolysis, with an apparent pl<strong>at</strong>eau or a peak in<br />

<strong>the</strong> weight loss curve <strong>at</strong> 900-llOO°C, followed by an increase in <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong><br />

pyrolysis. Scaroni, et al. (7) suggest th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is no direct he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e effect<br />

on <strong>the</strong> L.- o-nt <strong>of</strong> pyrolysis, but ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> preponderance <strong>of</strong> secondary char-forming<br />

reactions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primaryvol<strong>at</strong>iles may yield an apparent he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e effect as well<br />

as a sample-weight effect. There is evidence th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> char formed by rapid he<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

<strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ure: is very reactive (3, 8). The previous work on pyrolysis <strong>at</strong><br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ures > 1000 C has been <strong>at</strong> 1 <strong>at</strong>m pressure.<br />

To help fill in <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a gaps, <strong>the</strong> present work has <strong>the</strong>refore been focused on<br />

<strong>the</strong> examin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> pyrolysis <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ures (800-16OO0C), <strong>pressures</strong> (1-15 <strong>at</strong>m)<br />

and in various reacting and nonreacting gases.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

A new design <strong>of</strong> a HPHT (high pressure, high temper<strong>at</strong>ure) TGA was utilized in<br />

this research. The details <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> design and its performance have been discussed<br />

elsewhere (9). The system is depicted in Figure 1, which mainly consists <strong>of</strong> two<br />

chambers. The chambers are designed for 1200 psi, although supporting inlet lines<br />

limited <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing pressure to 450 psi. The small Grayloc flange was used as a<br />

port to introduce samples into <strong>the</strong> TGA. By raising <strong>the</strong> top chamber, <strong>at</strong>taching <strong>the</strong><br />

sample, <strong>the</strong>n lowering <strong>the</strong> chamber and securing <strong>the</strong> flange, a cumbersome, leaky port<br />

is avoided. A rugged electrobalance with a continuous weighing system, driven by an<br />

electric motor, is employed to lower <strong>the</strong> samples into <strong>the</strong> hot zone for weight-loss<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a. The he<strong>at</strong>ing system is a yttrium-stabilized ceramic "Kanthal" he<strong>at</strong>ing element.<br />

These elements are capable <strong>of</strong> 18OO0C surface temper<strong>at</strong>ure, and work best in oxidizing<br />

gases. Temper<strong>at</strong>ures were monitored throughout by Pt-Rh/Pt <strong>the</strong>rmocouples. Steam can<br />

be introduced via a separ<strong>at</strong>e stainless steel flow system from gas lines, and condens<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

was avoided by maintaining <strong>the</strong> entire lower chamber <strong>at</strong> elev<strong>at</strong>ed temper<strong>at</strong>ures.<br />

This design has capability for quickly bringing <strong>the</strong> sample from a cold zone<br />

into <strong>the</strong> hot zone in less than 5 seconds, taking subsequent weight-loss d<strong>at</strong>a, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n removing <strong>the</strong> sample as quickly. The temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>at</strong> various points in <strong>the</strong><br />

system were calibr<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> each reactor temper<strong>at</strong>ure and pressure. The temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile is such th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample in <strong>the</strong> pyrolyzing-temper<strong>at</strong>ure region<br />

was achieved <strong>at</strong> a r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 500-1500°K/sec depending on <strong>the</strong> reaction zone temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

There is provision for several ports for gas input. Pyrolysis, external gas-<br />

50<br />

I


diffusion limit<strong>at</strong>ions, and char kinetic reactivity were analyzed from <strong>the</strong> weight-<br />

loss d<strong>at</strong>a by both varying time in <strong>the</strong> reaction zone and gas flow r<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

The <strong>coal</strong>s studied included lignite (PSOC-246), bituminous (PSOC-309) and<br />

subbituminous (PSOC-240) samples. Samples <strong>of</strong> 50-100 mg were weighed, loaded and<br />

lowered in <strong>the</strong> sample holder into <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ed chamber as described. Most runs used a<br />

pl<strong>at</strong>inum-mesh folded screen (52 mesh) as <strong>the</strong> sample holder. For some studies on<br />

particle size, <strong>the</strong> sample holder was a disked pl<strong>at</strong>inum foil. The results obtained<br />

on pyrolysis and gasific<strong>at</strong>ion using <strong>the</strong> two different sample holders m<strong>at</strong>ched very<br />

well, indic<strong>at</strong>ing no effect <strong>of</strong> sample holder geometry.<br />

The <strong>coal</strong> particle sizes used were 35-48,,48-60, 60-80, and 80-100 mesh<br />

(2 = 358, 273, 213 and 163 pm, respectively). The gaseous environments were nitrog&,<br />

carbon dioxide, nitrogen-steam. Pyrolysis and subsequent in-situ reaction with<br />

gas following pyrolysis were run <strong>at</strong> 800-16OO0C, 1-15 <strong>at</strong>m.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Typical weight-loss d<strong>at</strong>a obtained <strong>at</strong> 1200°C in both nitrogen and nitrogensteam<br />

for <strong>the</strong> lignite <strong>coal</strong> are shown in Figure 2. Note th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> determin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

percent pyrolysis in <strong>the</strong> inert nitrogen is straightforward, while in a reacting<br />

environment it is obscured by <strong>the</strong> rapid chemical reactions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>iles and char.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> break in <strong>the</strong> curve is identified by extrapol<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> primary pyrolysis and<br />

reaction curve portions, respectively (p) and (r), this weight-loss can be called<br />

<strong>the</strong> apparent pyrolysis; and <strong>the</strong> apparent percent pyrolysis determined. The values<br />

thus obtained for <strong>the</strong> apparent percent pyrolysis as well as <strong>the</strong> pyrolysis time were<br />

found consistent and reproducible under a given set <strong>of</strong> conditions, as confirmed by<br />

repe<strong>at</strong>ed runs. It may be noticed from Figure 2 th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> ultim<strong>at</strong>e pyrolysis in<br />

nitrogen is gre<strong>at</strong>er than <strong>the</strong> apparent pyrolysis in <strong>the</strong> reacting gas, while in <strong>the</strong><br />

same time period <strong>the</strong> awunt pyrolyzed is more or less <strong>the</strong> same in <strong>the</strong> two cases.<br />

In Figure 3 are presented <strong>the</strong> apparent percent pyrolysis <strong>of</strong> lignite as a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure for different gases. Note th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> apparent percent<br />

pyrolysis in C02 and N2-H20 is less than th<strong>at</strong> in nitrogen, in agreement with <strong>the</strong><br />

above discussion.<br />

There is a pl<strong>at</strong>eau in <strong>the</strong> curve <strong>of</strong> percent apparent pyrolysis (devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion)<br />

versus temper<strong>at</strong>ure in <strong>the</strong> region 1200-1400°C. This type <strong>of</strong> phenomena can be<br />

found in <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a <strong>of</strong> Menster et al. (1) and Kobayashi et al. (6). Suuberg et al.<br />

(10) observed two stages (or pl<strong>at</strong>eaus) in <strong>coal</strong> pyrolysis up to a temper<strong>at</strong>ure near<br />

llOO°C, and a third stage was envisaged above th<strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure. This third stage<br />

was assumed to remove primarily CO and C02. The d<strong>at</strong>a <strong>of</strong> Kobayashi et al. (6)<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>e percent weight-loss near 60 percent <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures above 15OOOC. The<br />

present results are consistent with <strong>the</strong> results reported by <strong>the</strong>se authors and confirm<br />

a third pl<strong>at</strong>eau stage.<br />

Figure 4 presents devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion results <strong>at</strong> various temper<strong>at</strong>ures for predried<br />

<strong>coal</strong> and for various particle sizes in a CO gas. There appear to be sig-<br />

2<br />

nificant effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> moisture content in <strong>coal</strong> and various particle sizes. Although<br />

<strong>the</strong>se results are inconclusive, <strong>the</strong>y can be explained by ei<strong>the</strong>r an effect <strong>of</strong><br />

he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e on pyrolysis or by secondary pyrolysis reactions which are influenced<br />

by available surface area, moisture and o<strong>the</strong>r gases which could result in internal<br />

vol<strong>at</strong>ile decomposition and coke form<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Figure 5 presents <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> pressur$ on <strong>the</strong> apparent pyrolysis in a steam<br />

environment. At lower temper<strong>at</strong>ures (800-1100 C) <strong>the</strong> apparent pgrolysis increases<br />

slightly with pressure, while <strong>at</strong> higher temper<strong>at</strong>ures (1200-1400 C) <strong>the</strong>re is a de-<br />

crease in apparent pyrolysis with pressure. One possible explain<strong>at</strong>ion is th<strong>at</strong> <strong>at</strong><br />

lower temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>the</strong> increased gas concentr<strong>at</strong>ion increases <strong>the</strong> gasvol<strong>at</strong>ile re-<br />

51


actions, decreasing <strong>the</strong> secondary char form<strong>at</strong>ion reactions ; <strong>at</strong> higher temper<strong>at</strong>ures<br />

<strong>the</strong> increased pressure prevents some vol<strong>at</strong>iles from escaping <strong>the</strong> solid and thus<br />

particip<strong>at</strong>ing in secondary char-form<strong>at</strong>ion reactions. Similar results have been reported<br />

earlier (8) in a hydrogen <strong>at</strong>mosphere, wherein <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> pyrolysis was<br />

found to increase only beyond about 20 <strong>at</strong>m pressure. Notably, in steam this effect<br />

is observed <strong>at</strong> lower <strong>pressures</strong>. The present studies also bring out <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong><br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure on this behavior. Fur<strong>the</strong>r work in this area is necessary to confirm<br />

<strong>the</strong> anomalous results.<br />

Table 1 presents results <strong>of</strong> subsequent reactivity <strong>of</strong> chars formed by <strong>coal</strong><br />

devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion. A comparison is shown <strong>of</strong> chars formed in-situ, as in <strong>the</strong> present<br />

mentod with chars formed separ<strong>at</strong>ely and <strong>the</strong>n reacted. Note th<strong>at</strong> in-situ-formed char<br />

is a faccor two to ten times more reactive than chars formed separ<strong>at</strong>ely. Thus,<br />

keeping <strong>the</strong> char <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ures for longer times before reaction apparently<br />

renders <strong>the</strong> char less reactive, and can be interpreted as a morphological rearrangemmt.<br />

These results are in agreement with previous results <strong>at</strong> this labor<strong>at</strong>ory (U),<br />

and extend <strong>the</strong>se results to higher temper<strong>at</strong>ure regimes. It is suggested th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

char prepar<strong>at</strong>ion method dram<strong>at</strong>ically affects subsequent char reactivity.<br />

These<br />

effects must be considered in models <strong>of</strong> char reactivity and in <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> char re-<br />

activity d<strong>at</strong>a in <strong>coal</strong>-conversion reactor models and in <strong>the</strong> interpret<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> pilot-<br />

unit d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion generally increases with temper<strong>at</strong>ure in a manner consis tent<br />

with <strong>the</strong> proposed three-stage mechanism for <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>iles. Results<br />

here show a pl<strong>at</strong>eau <strong>at</strong> 1200-14OO0C and a maximum devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion above 15OO0c.<br />

Reactive gases can interact with <strong>the</strong> freshly formed vol<strong>at</strong>iles and affect <strong>the</strong> secondary<br />

char-forming reactions which can cause changes in <strong>the</strong> apparent percent pyrolysis.<br />

This was evident from <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> moisture content, particle size, pressure and<br />

gaseous environment on <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> pyrolysis. Reactivity <strong>of</strong> char formed in-situ<br />

and immedi<strong>at</strong>ely reacted was found to be higher than reactivlty <strong>of</strong> chars formed<br />

separ<strong>at</strong>ely and <strong>the</strong>n brought into <strong>the</strong> reactive environment.<br />

It is suggested th<strong>at</strong><br />

morphological rearrangements may be important in pyrolysis and subsequent char re-<br />

actions.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGlIENT<br />

This work was made possible by a grant from <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, Contract<br />

NO. ET-78-S-01-3253.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Menster, M., O'Donnell, H. J. and Ergun, S., "Rapid Thermal Decomposition <strong>of</strong><br />

Bituminous Coals," Am. &em. SOC., Div. <strong>of</strong> Fuel Chem. Preprints 2 (5) 94<br />

(1970).<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

Menster, M., O'Donnell, J. J., Ergun, S. and Friedel, R. A., "Devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Coal by Rapid He<strong>at</strong>ing, " i n Coal Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion, p. 1, Advances in Chemistry<br />

Series No. 131, Am. &em. SOC., Washington, D.C. (1974).<br />

Nsakala, N.Y., Essenhigh, R. H. and Walker, P. L., Jr., Fuel57 605 (1978).<br />

4. Nsakala, N.Y., Essenhigh, R. H. and Walker, P. L., Jr., Comb. Sci. & Technol.8<br />

- 16 -153 (1977).<br />

5.<br />

Badzioch, S. and Hawksley, P. G. W., Ind. Eng. &em. Process Des. & Dev. 9 (4)<br />

521 (1970).<br />

52


6.<br />

7.<br />

1 a.<br />

i 9.<br />

1<br />

10.<br />

11.<br />

12.<br />

Kobayashi, H., Howard, J. B. and Sar<strong>of</strong>im, A. F., "Coal Devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong><br />

High Temper<strong>at</strong>ures, " 16th Intern. Symp. on Combustion, p. 411, The Combustion<br />

Institute, Pittsburgh, Pa. (1977).<br />

Scaroni, A. W., Walker, P. I,., Jr. and Essenhigh, R. H., Fuel 60 71 (1981).<br />

Anthony, D. B., Howard, J. B., Hottel, H. C. and Meissner, H. P., Fuel 2<br />

121 (1976).<br />

Sears, J. T., Maxfield, E. A. and Tamhankar, S. S., "A Pressurized Themo-<br />

balance Appartus for Use in Oxidizing Atmospheres <strong>at</strong> High Temper<strong>at</strong>ures,''<br />

Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundamentals (submitted 1981).<br />

Suubert, E. M., Peters, W. A. and Howard, J. B., Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des.<br />

& kv. 17 37 (1978).<br />

Agarwal, A. K. and Sears, J. T., Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. 6 Dev. 19 364<br />

(1980).<br />

Linares-Solano, A., Mahajan, 0. P. and Walker, P. L., Jr., Fuel 58 327 (1979).<br />

Pl<strong>at</strong>inum Mrih Sample Hnldrr


01<br />

40 60<br />

TI MEISeC)<br />

80 100 120 140 160<br />

FIG. 2. ~PRE~ENTATIM K1o-t~ bss CURES ~TAINED AT ~KPC WITH PSOC-246 LIWITE.<br />

J 700 800 900 lo00 1100 1200 UOO 1400 1503 1600<br />

FIG, 3.<br />

TEMPERATURE ( ‘C )<br />

h N T OF kRoLYSlS AS A FINCTION OF TCtVmATURE FOR mC-246 LIWITE.<br />

54


-7<br />

34'<br />

Average<br />

Parlicle size<br />

(pm)<br />

358<br />

21 3<br />

163<br />

Moisture<br />

contenl<br />

i%)<br />

21.7<br />

X 358 &dried<br />

<strong>at</strong> 1roOc<br />

> 800 900 1000 1100 1MO 1300 1400 1500 1600<br />

TEMPERATURE ( "C )<br />

FIG. 4. EFFECTS OF PPRTIU SIZE PND FblSTuRE h TENT ON ME &TENT OF kULYSlS IN ATMISPHERE.<br />

O<br />

D<br />

I,<br />

0,<br />

800 .C<br />

900 'c<br />

1ooo'c<br />

1100 c<br />

1200. c<br />

1400.C<br />

2 4 6 8 lo 12 14 16 18<br />

PRESSURE ( ATM )<br />

FIG. 5. VARIATIW OF RRCENT F'YRXYSIS WITH TEFPEWTLRE AND PRESSURE IN t$-l$O.<br />

55


Reaction Temper<strong>at</strong>ure OC<br />

In-situ<br />

Initial<br />

Reactivity<br />

mg/ng !.lin. Preformed<br />

Char*<br />

Reaction Temper<strong>at</strong>ure OC<br />

Table 1<br />

REACTIVITY OF CfiARS AS A FUNCTION OF PREPARATION CONDITIONS<br />

900 950 1000 1050 1200 1250 1300<br />

0.30 0.40 0.69 0.80 2.14 2.15 2.15<br />

0.26 0.32 0.57 0.62 0.88 0.89 1.02<br />

1250 1300 1350 1400<br />

Initial I In-situ I 0.54 0.67 1.13 1.30<br />

iteactivity I I<br />

mg/mg Min. Preformed<br />

1 Char* 1 0.50 0.60 0.76 0.79<br />

(C) Comparison <strong>of</strong> In-situ Reactivities with O<strong>the</strong>r Reported Results<br />

:*laximum<br />

Reaction Reactivity<br />

Coal Type Method/Tre<strong>at</strong>ment Temp. OC Gas rng/mg !.:in. Ref.<br />

~<br />

~ ~<br />

N.D. lignite In-situ 9 10 N2-HzO 0.48 Present<br />

(PSOC-246) (excess H20) study<br />

N.D. lignite Coal he<strong>at</strong>ed in N2 <strong>at</strong> 910 N2-ti23 0.0467 12<br />

(PSOC- 87) lOOC/min to lOOOOC, (excess H20)<br />

kept for 2 lirs,<br />

cooled. Rehe<strong>at</strong>ed in<br />

N2 <strong>at</strong> ZOoC/nin to<br />

IOOOOC, cooled to<br />

91OOC, !ield for 20<br />

inin, reacted.<br />

HVC bituminous<br />

In-situ 9 20 CO2 0.20 Present<br />

(PSOC- 309) <strong>at</strong> 6000C/sec<br />

study<br />

HVC bituminous In-situ 9 20 CO2 0.088 11<br />

(I’SOC-309) <strong>at</strong> - 2o0°C/min.<br />

*Char prepared by pyrolyzing <strong>coal</strong> in N2 <strong>at</strong> llOO°C for 2 min.<br />

56


SIMULATION OF ENTRAINED FLOW HYDROPYROLYSIS REACTORS<br />

A. Goyal<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Gas Technology<br />

Chicago, Illinois 60616<br />

D. Gidaspow<br />

Chemical Engineering Department<br />

Illinois Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Chicago, Illinois 60616<br />

The phenomena <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> pyrolysis and hydropyrolysis have become <strong>of</strong> considerable<br />

interest in recent years because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir significance in <strong>the</strong> efficient<br />

conversion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s to clean fuels. The proposed hydropyrolysis commercial<br />

reactors are usually based on <strong>the</strong> entrained flow concept in which <strong>coal</strong> particles<br />

are rapidly he<strong>at</strong>ed in a dilute phase by mixing with hot hydrogen (or a gas<br />

mixture rich in hydrogen).<br />

A wide vari<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> product distribution can<br />

be obtained in such reactors by manipul<strong>at</strong>ing temper<strong>at</strong>ure, residence time, and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r oper<strong>at</strong>ing parameters. Ma<strong>the</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ical models incorpor<strong>at</strong>ing hydrodynamics,<br />

<strong>coal</strong> kinetics, he<strong>at</strong> transfer characteristics, etc. are needed for understanding<br />

<strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> design variables, feed m<strong>at</strong>erials, and process conditions on<br />

<strong>the</strong> reactor performance. The liter<strong>at</strong>ure is lacking in <strong>coal</strong> hydropyrolysis<br />

entrained flow reactor models. Such a model has been developed in this study.<br />

Ma<strong>the</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ical Formul<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

A one-dimensional ma<strong>the</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ical model has been formul<strong>at</strong>ed here. The physical<br />

system considered is an entrained flow hydropyrolysis reactor. Pulverized <strong>coal</strong><br />

mixes with <strong>the</strong> hot gas feed <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactor entrance. As <strong>coal</strong> particles are<br />

carried by <strong>the</strong> gas, <strong>the</strong>ir temper<strong>at</strong>ure increases and hydropyrolysis takes place.<br />

The single <strong>coal</strong> particle hydropyrolysis kinetic model used in this study<br />

is described by Goyal (1). The model is primarily based on Johnson's kinetic<br />

model (2, 3, 4) supplemented by Suuberg's kinetic model (5) for rapid reactions.<br />

In this model, <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> is assumed to consist <strong>of</strong> eleven solid species while <strong>the</strong><br />

gas <strong>of</strong> nine species (Table 1). Gaseous species (CH,), represents gaseous heavy<br />

hydrocarbons while (cHM)b represents vaporized oils and tars.<br />

The kinetic model has been combined here with reactor flow model and he<strong>at</strong><br />

and mass transfer characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> multiparticle system to derive a reactor<br />

model. Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> significant amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> weight loss and gas gener<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

in such systems, hydrodynamics may also be very important.<br />

The equ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

describing <strong>the</strong> system are given in Table 2. In this formul<strong>at</strong>ion, it is assumed<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> reaction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solid-gas phase reaction affects <strong>the</strong> solid<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure only while th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> occurring solely in <strong>the</strong> gas phase affects <strong>the</strong><br />

gas phase temper<strong>at</strong>ure only. Also, <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> swelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> particles<br />

is directly proportional to <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong><br />

expression giving <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solid species CHx (semichar) is<br />

somewh<strong>at</strong> complex. This r<strong>at</strong>e is dependent on <strong>the</strong> time-temper<strong>at</strong>ure history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

particle and involves a double integr<strong>at</strong>ion. The ma<strong>the</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ical manipul<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

performed to simplify <strong>the</strong> complexity resulted into several additional differential<br />

equ<strong>at</strong>ions, <strong>the</strong> details <strong>of</strong> which are given by Goyal (1).<br />

The solid species production r<strong>at</strong>e (Si) is given by equ<strong>at</strong>ion (18). The gas<br />

species production r<strong>at</strong>es can be rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> solid species production r<strong>at</strong>es (1).<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>coal</strong> hydrogen<strong>at</strong>ion experiments in <strong>the</strong> labor<strong>at</strong>ory are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

carried out in helical reactors (4, 6). The rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between <strong>the</strong> particle<br />

57


and <strong>the</strong> gas velocity is <strong>of</strong>ten represented in terms <strong>of</strong> a slip velocity factor ($s).<br />

In such reactor, <strong>the</strong> centrifugal forces are <strong>of</strong>ten more important than gravit<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

force. This slip velocity factor depends on <strong>the</strong> tube diameter, helix diameter,<br />

solids to gas r<strong>at</strong>io, particle size, gas velocity, etc. Thus for helical reactors:<br />

D(vs) = 9,D(vg)<br />

This equ<strong>at</strong>ion replaces equ<strong>at</strong>ion (5) in Table 2.<br />

This set <strong>of</strong> equ<strong>at</strong>ions (Table 2) also requires a large number <strong>of</strong> auxiliary,<br />

algebric equ<strong>at</strong>ions as component model parts; for example rel<strong>at</strong>ionships for fs, fw,<br />

hgp, hgw, E~~!, etc. These rel<strong>at</strong>ionships are taken from <strong>the</strong> liter<strong>at</strong>ure and <strong>the</strong><br />

details are given by Goyal (1).<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> model has been developed here for <strong>coal</strong> hydropyrolysis.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> formul<strong>at</strong>ions and <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> solution are flexible and can<br />

be easily manipul<strong>at</strong>ed for o<strong>the</strong>r entrained flow gasifiers, for example, pe<strong>at</strong><br />

gasific<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Solution Methodology<br />

The entrained flow hydropyrolysis reactor has been modeled in <strong>the</strong> preceding<br />

section by a set <strong>of</strong> fifty three simultaneous nonlinear first order ordinary<br />

differential equ<strong>at</strong>ions. The solutions to <strong>the</strong> formul<strong>at</strong>ions are sought in <strong>the</strong> form<br />

<strong>of</strong> time histories <strong>of</strong> quantities such as particle and gas temper<strong>at</strong>ure, <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

compositions, velocities, densities, and o<strong>the</strong>r derived quantities such as<br />

conversion etc. This system <strong>of</strong> equ<strong>at</strong>ions is very stiff primarily due to <strong>the</strong><br />

high temper<strong>at</strong>ure dependence <strong>of</strong> various hydropyrolysis reactor r<strong>at</strong>es (1). A<br />

computer program based on implicit backward differenti<strong>at</strong>ion formulas <strong>of</strong> orders<br />

one through five (Gear's method) has successfully been used here in solving<br />

this set <strong>of</strong> stiff equ<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

Comparison With Experimental D<strong>at</strong>a<br />

Cities Service Research and Development Company has performed studies on <strong>the</strong><br />

hydropyrolysis <strong>of</strong> Montana Rosebud subbituminous <strong>coal</strong>, Western Kentucky No. 9/14<br />

bituminous <strong>coal</strong>, and North Dakota lignite. Experiments were conducted in a<br />

bench-scale system <strong>of</strong> 2-4 lb/hr nominal capacity entrained-downflow tubular<br />

reactor. Different types <strong>of</strong> reactors (free fall, vertically-entrained,<br />

helically-entrained) were used in this study. The reactor was mounted inside<br />

an electric furnace designed for iso<strong>the</strong>rmal oper<strong>at</strong>ion. Prehe<strong>at</strong>ed hydrogen and<br />

<strong>coal</strong> were mixed inside a high-velocity coaxial injector nozzle loc<strong>at</strong>ed near<br />

<strong>the</strong> entrance to produce very high he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>es. The <strong>coal</strong>-hydrogen mixture<br />

moved to <strong>the</strong> reactor outlet where it was quenched to below 1000°F directly by<br />

a stream <strong>of</strong> cryogenically-cooled hydrogen, which termin<strong>at</strong>ed reactions. A more<br />

detailed description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactor system has been given by Hamshar et al. (7).<br />

The reactor and <strong>coal</strong> types, flow r<strong>at</strong>es, and oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions used in<br />

different test runs have been summarized along with experimental results by<br />

Cities Service Research and Development Co. (6). Oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions were<br />

varied in <strong>the</strong> nominal ranges <strong>of</strong> 1400°-17000F reactor temper<strong>at</strong>ure, 34-170 <strong>at</strong>m<br />

reactor pressure, 0.18-1.3 hydrogen/<strong>coal</strong> weight r<strong>at</strong>io, and 0.3-25 sec vapor<br />

residence time. A few runs utilized a 78/22 (vol.) mixture <strong>of</strong> hydrogen/<br />

methane feed gas; <strong>the</strong> remainder used high purity hydrogen. The reactor<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure was measured by a series <strong>of</strong> removable skin <strong>the</strong>rmocouples tacked along<br />

<strong>the</strong> wall <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactor. However, <strong>the</strong>se measured temper<strong>at</strong>ure pr<strong>of</strong>iles have not<br />

been reported. Instead, <strong>the</strong> mix temper<strong>at</strong>ure, maximum gas temper<strong>at</strong>ure and<br />

equivalent iso<strong>the</strong>rmal temper<strong>at</strong>ure for each run have been reported.<br />

58


A total <strong>of</strong> twenty-one runs having good carbon and ash balance closures have<br />

been simul<strong>at</strong>ed in this study. The oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions for <strong>the</strong>se runs are given<br />

by Goyal (1). The <strong>coal</strong> feed in <strong>the</strong>se runs was dry. Also, several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir tests<br />

were conducted in helical coil reactors. Oko et al. (8) from Cities Service<br />

have recently reported <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> a helical glass cold-flow study. In this<br />

appar<strong>at</strong>us, average particle velocities were measured in <strong>the</strong> same flow regimes<br />

th<strong>at</strong> were experienced in <strong>the</strong> bench-scale hydropyrolysis appar<strong>at</strong>us. The following<br />

empirical equ<strong>at</strong>ion was derived to estim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> slip velocity factor:<br />

- --<br />

$s = vs/v = 1 - ko RegPRcq (DH/Dt)r<br />

g<br />

where ko, p, q, and r are empirical constants.<br />

Several important reactor performance parameters have been compared here in<br />

Figures 1 through 4. Figure 1 shows a comparison <strong>of</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ed and experimental<br />

carbon conversion for different types <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s. As seen from this figure, <strong>the</strong><br />

computer model calcul<strong>at</strong>ions agreed quite closely with <strong>the</strong> actual experimental<br />

results. Figure 2 compares <strong>the</strong> predicted moisture-ash-free (MAF) <strong>coal</strong> conversions<br />

with <strong>the</strong> experimental values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se conversions. The comparison is quite good;<br />

however, <strong>the</strong> model somewh<strong>at</strong> underpredicts this <strong>coal</strong> conversion. This is<br />

primarily due to <strong>the</strong> fact th<strong>at</strong> Johnson's model allows for only 89% <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> oxygen<br />

evolution whereas <strong>the</strong> experimental oxygen evolution is approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 97%. If<br />

this additional oxygen were allowed to evolve, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> predicted <strong>coal</strong> conversion<br />

would increase by approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 1.5%. This would result in an excellent<br />

comparison.<br />

Figure 3 compares <strong>the</strong> predicted carbon conversion to light hydrocarbons<br />

methane + ethane with experimental values. The predicted methane + ethane yield<br />

is somewh<strong>at</strong> higher. The comparison <strong>of</strong> carbon oxides yield is shown in Figure 4.<br />

The model underpredicts thls yield. Again, it is probably because Johnson's<br />

model allows for only 89% <strong>coal</strong> oxygen removal while reported <strong>coal</strong> oxygen removal<br />

is in <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> 95% to 100%.<br />

As mentioned earlier, <strong>the</strong> model is capable <strong>of</strong> predicting time histories <strong>of</strong><br />

quantities such as conversions, particle and gas temper<strong>at</strong>ures, <strong>the</strong>ir flow r<strong>at</strong>es,<br />

compositions, velocities, etc. As an example, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> important reactor<br />

variables have been summarized (as a function <strong>of</strong> reactor length) in Figures 5 to<br />

7 for Run No. KB-5 with Western Kentucky bituminous <strong>coal</strong> feed. In this test,<br />

a 17.7 ft long and 0.26 inch ID reactor was oper<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> 1557OF (EIT) and 1500<br />

psia hydrogen pressure. The superficial gas velocity, vapor residence time<br />

and hydrogen/<strong>coal</strong> weight r<strong>at</strong>io were 12.3 ft/sec, 1.44 sec, and 1.17 respectively.<br />

The wall temper<strong>at</strong>ure was assumed to be 1581°F which is <strong>the</strong> average <strong>of</strong> reported<br />

maximum reactor temper<strong>at</strong>ure and EIT. The d<strong>at</strong>a points shown in <strong>the</strong>se figures are<br />

<strong>the</strong> actual experimental results <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactor's exit.<br />

Figure 5 shows carbon and MAF <strong>coal</strong> conversions as a function <strong>of</strong> reactor<br />

length. As seen from <strong>the</strong> figure, a significant conversion (12% to 14%) takes<br />

place within 0.1 ft reactor length. Note th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactor length has been<br />

shown on a log scale, which allows to show <strong>the</strong> significant conversions occurring<br />

in <strong>the</strong> extremely short distance near <strong>the</strong> entrance. The particle residence time<br />

is also calcul<strong>at</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> model and is shown <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> graph.<br />

Figure 6 shows <strong>the</strong> carbon conversion to different species over <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> reactor. It shows th<strong>at</strong> oil is evolved first and very rapidly. Again, log<br />

scale has been used to represent <strong>the</strong> reactor length. The change in <strong>the</strong> gas<br />

composition over <strong>the</strong> reactor length is shown in Figure 7. Pure hydrogen feed<br />

gas was used in this test and 96% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exit product gas was hydrogen. This is<br />

SO because excess amount <strong>of</strong> hydrogen was used in this run.<br />

59


The ma<strong>the</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ical model developed here has been used successfully to<br />

describe <strong>the</strong>se hydropyrolysis reactors. Reasons for small discrepancies in<br />

experimental and predicted reactor performances are <strong>at</strong>tributable to inadequacies<br />

in model formul<strong>at</strong>ion, unavailability <strong>of</strong> experimental d<strong>at</strong>a particularly reactor<br />

wall temper<strong>at</strong>ure pr<strong>of</strong>iles, and uncertainties in <strong>the</strong> experimental d<strong>at</strong>a. /<br />

A detailed parametric study has been performed using this model to identify<br />

important reactor parameters for <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> commercial entrained flow<br />

hydropyrolysis reactors. The results are given elsewhere (1).<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

The authors are gr<strong>at</strong>eful to Dr. S. Weil for providing many helpful suggestions<br />

and criticisms throughout this entire study.<br />

Nomencl<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

Contact area between solids and gas per unit reactor volume<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> carbon <strong>at</strong>oms per mole <strong>of</strong> gas species (CHzIa<br />

Reactor cross-sectional area<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> carbon <strong>at</strong>oms per mole <strong>of</strong> gas species (CHpf)b<br />

R<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> gas species j going from solid phase to gas phase (i.e. crossing<br />

boundary) per unit reactor volume<br />

Fractional <strong>coal</strong> conversion (moisture-free)<br />

Fractional <strong>coal</strong> conversion (moisture-ash-free)<br />

He<strong>at</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> gas species j<br />

He<strong>at</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> solid species i<br />

Deriv<strong>at</strong>ive with respect to distance along reactor (x)<br />

Helix diameter<br />

Particle diameter<br />

Reactor diameter<br />

Drag force exerted by fluid on <strong>the</strong> particles per unit volume <strong>of</strong> particles<br />

Frictional force between <strong>the</strong> gas and <strong>the</strong> wall <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactor<br />

Solids flow r<strong>at</strong>e per unit reactor cross-sectional area<br />

Gravit<strong>at</strong>ional acceler<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Conversion factor (32.2 lbm-ft/sec2/lbf)<br />

Gas flow r<strong>at</strong>e per unit reactor cross-sectional area<br />

Total enthalpy <strong>of</strong> gas species j<br />

Overall he<strong>at</strong> transfer coefficient between gas and solid particle<br />

Overall he<strong>at</strong> transfer coefficient between gas and wall<br />

Total enthalpy <strong>of</strong> solid species i<br />

R<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> gaseous hydrogen reacting with solid phase per unit reactor volume<br />

Wall he<strong>at</strong> losses fron reactor per unit reactor length (due to convection<br />

between gas and wall)<br />

60


1:<br />

I<br />

!.<br />

Hlsa<br />

M<br />

Total wall he<strong>at</strong> losses from reactor per unit reactor length per unit<br />

reactor cross-sectional area<br />

Atomic r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> hydrogen to carbon in oils and tars (also in species CHK)<br />

\ Mj Molecular weight <strong>of</strong> gas species j<br />

p Total reactor pressure<br />

Qash<br />

R Universal gas constant<br />

R,<br />

Reg Gas Reynolds number<br />

Ri<br />

Ash flow r<strong>at</strong>e per unit reactor cross-sectional area<br />

Char to gas weight r<strong>at</strong>io<br />

Reaction r<strong>at</strong>e (d


si<br />

sio<br />

Fraction <strong>of</strong> solid species i not yet gasified (i # CHy)<br />

= 1 for i # CH,,<br />

wC$ Maximum lbs <strong>of</strong> CHy th<strong>at</strong> can be formed per lb <strong>of</strong> ash (equ<strong>at</strong>ion 21)<br />

wio Lbs <strong>of</strong> solid species i in raw <strong>coal</strong> per lb <strong>of</strong> ash (i # CHy)<br />

Slip velocity factor defined as <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> solids velocity to gas velocity<br />

@s<br />

Subscript<br />

i Refers to solid species<br />

j Refers to gas species<br />

References<br />

Goyal, A., Ma<strong>the</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ical Modeling <strong>of</strong> Entrained-Flow Coal Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Reactors, Ph.D. Thesis, Illinois Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Chicago, IL,<br />

May (1980).<br />

Johnson, J. L., ACS, Div. <strong>of</strong> Fuel Chem. Preprints, 0, No. 3, 61 (1975).<br />

Johnson, J. L., ACS, Div. <strong>of</strong> Fuel Chem. Preprints, 2, No. 1, 17 (1977).<br />

Johnson, J. L. and D. Q. Tran, "Kinetics <strong>of</strong> Devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion and Rapid-R<strong>at</strong>e<br />

Methane Form<strong>at</strong>ion," Final Report, AGA Project IU-4-11, GRI Contract<br />

No. 5010-322-0025, Report No. GRI-78/0049, Institute <strong>of</strong> Gas Technology,<br />

Chicago, IL, Nov. (1980).<br />

Suuberg, E. M., W. A. Peters and J. B. Howard, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process<br />

Design Develop., 17. No. 1, 37 (1978).<br />

Cities Service Research and Development Company, "Hydrogasifier Development<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Hydrane Process," Final Technical Progress Report, Feb. 1977 to<br />

July 1978, Subcontract to Rocketdyne Division <strong>of</strong> Rockwell Intern<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

Corpor<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> DOE Contract No. EX-77-C-01-2518, Cranbury, NJ, July<br />

31 (1978).<br />

Hamshar, J. A., S. J. Bivacca and M. I. Greene, Paper presented <strong>at</strong> 71st<br />

Annual AIChE Meeting, Miami Beach, FL, Nov. (1978).<br />

Oko, U. M., J. A. Harnshar, G. Cuneo and S. Kim, ACS, Div. <strong>of</strong> Fuel Chem.<br />

Preprints, g, No. 3, 82 (1979).<br />

Gidaspow , D. , "Hyperbolic 'Compressible Two-Phase Flow Equ<strong>at</strong>ions Based on<br />

St<strong>at</strong>ionary Principles and <strong>the</strong> Fick's Law," in Two Phase Transport and<br />

Reactor Safety, edited by S. Kakac and T. N. Veziroglu, 1, p. 283,<br />

Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington, D. C. (1978).<br />

62


Table 1. Solid and Gas Species<br />

Solid Species Gas Species<br />

1. HOH 1. co<br />

2. 0.0 2. co2<br />

3. OH 3. H2<br />

4. co 4. H20<br />

5. coo 5. CH4<br />

6. CHH 6. C2H6<br />

7. CHZ 7. (CHZ)a<br />

8. C s 8. (Cs)b<br />

9. CHx 9. Inert gas<br />

10. CH Y<br />

11. Ash<br />

Table 2. Differential Equ<strong>at</strong>ions Model<br />

Total Solids Mass Balance: D[(l-E)psvsl = E(Si)s = D(F) 1)<br />

Total Gas Mass Balance: D(E p v ) = Z(S.) = D(G) 2)<br />

g g 1 g<br />

Solids Species Balance: D(Qashwi"Si) = (Si)s 3)<br />

Gas Species Balance: D(E p v y.) = (S.) 4)<br />

g g 1 1 g<br />

Constitutive Equ<strong>at</strong>ion for <strong>the</strong> Mixture: (Ref. 9)<br />

- vS)l = fs/ps - g sin e 5)<br />

Mixture Momentum Balance: gcD(P) = (v - V ~)Z(S~)~ - ( l-~)p~v~D(v~)<br />

g<br />

-E P v D(v ) - f - [~,(l-s)+p<br />

g g g w<br />

EI g sin e<br />

g<br />

Solids Density: D(ps) = DIZ(wio~i)pa~h/VRl 7)<br />

Gas Density: D(pg) = D[(P/RT g )(Zy./M.)-'] 1 1 8)<br />

63<br />

6)


Table 2. Differential Equ<strong>at</strong>ions Model (cant.)<br />

Solids Phase Energy Balance: D(T ) = - (-HZgs) (hgH )T + L(B.)(hgj)Ts +<br />

3<br />

2 g<br />

4 4<br />

h a(Ts - T ) - 4aBcapp(Tw - TS )/Dt)/Qash +<br />

gP g<br />

X(wio (hsi)T D(S,)]/[Z(W~"S~C~~~)]<br />

s<br />

Gas Phase Energy Balance: D(T ) = [(-H 2gs)(hgH2)~s + UBj)(hgj)TS +<br />

g<br />

h a(Ts - T )-Hls/A -L(h ) (S.) l/[Z(Gy.C )I<br />

gP g gj Tg 3 g J pgj<br />

Fractional Coal Conversion: D(C) = D~l-Z(wio~i)/Z(wioSio)~<br />

Particle Rel<strong>at</strong>ive Volume:<br />

Average Particle Diameter:<br />

Gas Residence Time:<br />

Particle Residence Time:<br />

Total He<strong>at</strong> Loss:<br />

Useful Algebric Equ<strong>at</strong>ions:<br />

= -L(S.)<br />

3 g .<br />

(si)s = (l-E)PashWiOKi<br />

= D[-Z(Si)S/{ QashC(wioSio)<br />

3<br />

D(VR) = DC(1 + ySCaf) 1<br />

D(e ) = l/vg<br />

g<br />

D(D ) = (D /3VR)D(VR)<br />

P P<br />

D(es) = l/vs<br />

4 4<br />

D(Hlsa) = Hls/A - 40 E<br />

B app(Tw - Ts )/Dt<br />

Qash = ( 1 - c ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br />

G = E P V<br />

gg<br />

CH " Y ('CHy'%Hp)WCHx<br />

Hls = nDthgw(Tg - T,)<br />

Caf = CCX(Wi"Ci")/C I (w,"~,")-l}I<br />

64<br />

K


8 0 SUBBITUMINOUS<br />

i A BITUMINOUS<br />

g50 - 0 LIGNITE<br />

LL w<br />

> z<br />

0 V<br />

20 30 40 50 60<br />

EXPERIMENTAL CARBON CONVERSION, %<br />

Figure 1. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Experimental<br />

and Predicted Carbon Conversion<br />

!40u<br />

30<br />

30 40 50 60 70<br />

002 004 006 008 010<br />

EXPERIMENTAL MAF COAL CONVERSION, %<br />

MOLES CARBON OXIDE / MOLES OF<br />

FEED CARBON, EXPERIMENTAL<br />

Figure 2. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Experimental<br />

and Predicted Moisture-Ash-Free Coal<br />

Conv er s ion<br />

65<br />

00 01 02 03 04<br />

MOLES CARBON IN METHANE+ETHANE/<br />

MOLES OF FEED CARBON. EXPERIMENTAL<br />

Figure 3. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Experimental<br />

and Predicted Methane + Ethane Yields<br />

lL 0 SUBBiTUMINOUS<br />

0<br />

Y)<br />

D BITUMINOUS<br />

oo8 - 0 LIGNITE<br />

Figure 4. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Experimental<br />

and Predicted Carbon Oxides (CO + C02)<br />

Yields


1<br />

60 I I<br />

RUN KE-5<br />

50 T.1121K(1557'F)<br />

PARTICLE RESIDENCE TIME, rnr<br />

5 IO 50 100 200<br />

1 1 I l l<br />

500<br />

I<br />

IO00 1650<br />

I I<br />

P. IO 3 i 1o6Po~150OPr~o)<br />

40<br />

s<br />

i<br />

2 30<br />

U<br />

><br />

0<br />

" 20<br />

IO<br />

'<br />

.<br />

.<br />

.<br />

01 I I I<br />

0001 0 01 01 10 I<br />

REACTOR LENGTH. rn<br />

Figure 5. Carbon and Moisture-Ash-Free Coal<br />

Conversions along Reactor Length<br />

30<br />

Z RUN KE-5<br />

w<br />

5<br />

REACTOR LENGTH, 11<br />

0 01 01 I 10 20<br />

I I I I I<br />

T.1121 K (1557'Fl<br />

P = IO 3% IO~PO (1500 pria~<br />

..<br />

REACTOR LENGTH. m<br />

Figure 6. Distribution <strong>of</strong> Total Carbon Conversion<br />

to Different Species along Reactor Length<br />

REACTOR LENGTH, 11<br />

0<br />

40-<br />

4<br />

I<br />

a<br />

I<br />

12 16<br />

I I<br />

(100.1. - HZ' * -<br />

P. IO 3" l06PO (1500prtol -<br />

I 2 3 4 5 6<br />

REACTOR LENGTH, rn<br />

Figure 7. Gas Composition along Reactor Length<br />

66<br />

to


The Effect <strong>of</strong> Potassium Carbon<strong>at</strong>e on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Illinois No. 6 Coal<br />

A.H. Pulsifer and J.F. McGehee, Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering and Engineering<br />

Research Institute, Iowa St<strong>at</strong>e University, Ames, Iowa 50011.<br />

L. SarOff, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center, Pitts-<br />

burgh, Pennsylvania 15213.<br />

C<strong>at</strong>alyzed <strong>coal</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion can lead to reduced gasifier size and lower gas-<br />

ific<strong>at</strong>ion temper<strong>at</strong>ures which give gre<strong>at</strong>er <strong>the</strong>rmal efficiencies. Therefore, an in-<br />

vestig<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> steam gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a bituminous <strong>coal</strong> under moder<strong>at</strong>ely high<br />

Pressures was conducted. The primary objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study was to determine <strong>the</strong><br />

influence <strong>of</strong> an alkali metal carbon<strong>at</strong>e c<strong>at</strong>alyst on <strong>the</strong> kinetic parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

gasific<strong>at</strong>ion reaction.<br />

The <strong>coal</strong> chosen for <strong>the</strong> study was an Illinois No. 6 <strong>coal</strong> and this m<strong>at</strong>erial<br />

was gasified both with and without <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> potassium carbon<strong>at</strong>e. Experiments<br />

were carried out <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures between 700 and 900°C and <strong>at</strong> a pressure <strong>of</strong><br />

2.17 MPa (21.4 <strong>at</strong>m). The partial <strong>pressures</strong> <strong>of</strong> steam, carbon dioxide and hydr0g.c:.<br />

were also varied during <strong>the</strong> investig<strong>at</strong>ion. The carbon gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e was<br />

modeled using an unreacted, shrinking-core model and kinetic constants and activ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

energies were determined.<br />

Experiment a 1 Met hods<br />

The appar<strong>at</strong>us used to gasify <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> was a high-pressure, tubular, fixed<br />

bed reactor with an external he<strong>at</strong> supply. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unique fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> this<br />

appar<strong>at</strong>us was its charging system. A 10 g sample <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> was held <strong>at</strong> a tempera-<br />

ture near ambient in a pressurized vessel loc<strong>at</strong>ed above <strong>the</strong> reactor. Actu<strong>at</strong>ioq<br />

<strong>of</strong> a ball valve allowed <strong>the</strong> sample to fall into <strong>the</strong> reactor, commencing <strong>the</strong> ex-<br />

perimental run.<br />

The appar<strong>at</strong>us was able to gasify a sample <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> with steam, or mixtures <strong>of</strong><br />

steam and H2,N2, or C02. Carbon gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es were determined from <strong>the</strong> product<br />

gas flowr<strong>at</strong>e and composition.<br />

shown in Fig. 1.<br />

The essential fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> appar<strong>at</strong>us are<br />

The reactor and <strong>coal</strong> charging vessel were constructed from type 316 stainless<br />

steel. The reactor body was a 21-inch (53.3 cm) long, 3/4-inch schedule 150 tube<br />

with an outside diameter <strong>of</strong> 1.050 in. (26.7 mm) and an inside diameter <strong>of</strong> 0.514<br />

in. (15.6 mm). A 0.125-in. (3.2 mm) thick porous stainless steel disc was loc<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

inside <strong>the</strong> tube, 6.5 in. (16.5 cm) from <strong>the</strong> bottom. This disc supported <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> inside <strong>the</strong> reactor.<br />

The <strong>coal</strong> charging vessel, a cylindrical funnel-shaped container with a volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 50 cm3, was connected to <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactor by a vertical<br />

3/4-inch schedule 160 tube with an inside diameter <strong>of</strong> 0.464 in. (11.8 mm). A t<br />

<strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> this vessel was a ball valve. Charging <strong>the</strong> reactor was accomplished<br />

by opening <strong>the</strong> valve by means <strong>of</strong> a pneum<strong>at</strong>ic actu<strong>at</strong>or. The <strong>coal</strong> <strong>the</strong>n fell a distance<br />

<strong>of</strong> 11 in. (27.9 cm) into <strong>the</strong> reactor.<br />

The he<strong>at</strong> necessary to gener<strong>at</strong>e steam and gasify <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> was supplied externally<br />

through electric resistance he<strong>at</strong>ers. There were three separ<strong>at</strong>e electrical he<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

circuits. These supplied <strong>the</strong> gas prehe<strong>at</strong>er and steam vaporizer, <strong>the</strong> reactor<br />

furnace, and <strong>the</strong> bottom flange he<strong>at</strong>er.<br />

W<strong>at</strong>er for steam gener<strong>at</strong>ion was delivered to <strong>the</strong> system by a high-precision<br />

57


to condense excess steam, <strong>the</strong> pressure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cooled gases was reduced to <strong>at</strong>mos-<br />

pheric, and <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>the</strong>n analyzed. A quadrapole mass spectrometer was used to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> product gas compositions. The flowr<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> product gas was determined<br />

An experimental run was carried out in <strong>the</strong> following manner. Appropri<strong>at</strong>e conditions<br />

<strong>of</strong> reaction temper<strong>at</strong>ure and reactant gas partial pressure were selected. The<br />

flowr<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and carbon dioxide or hydrogen were adjusted to meet <strong>the</strong>se<br />

specific<strong>at</strong>ions as measured by timed readings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wet test meter. Steam flow was<br />

commenced by adjusting <strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er metering pump.<br />

and <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> entered <strong>the</strong> reaction zone.<br />

Finally <strong>the</strong> ball valve was opened<br />

During <strong>the</strong> first five minutes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> run, <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> products was rapid due<br />

Table 1. Analyses <strong>of</strong> Illinois No. 6 <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

Proxim<strong>at</strong>e analysis (wt. %)<br />

Vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter<br />

Fixed carbon<br />

Ash<br />

Ultim<strong>at</strong>e analysis (wt.%)<br />

Hydrogen<br />

Carbon<br />

Nitrogen<br />

Sulf ur<br />

Oxygen<br />

Ash<br />

He<strong>at</strong>ing Value<br />

Moisture free Moisture an(l<br />

<strong>coal</strong> ash free <strong>coal</strong><br />

40.5<br />

46.5<br />

13.0<br />

4.7<br />

67.7<br />

1.1<br />

3.8<br />

9.8<br />

13.0<br />

12307 Btu/lb<br />

(28619 kJ/kg)<br />

46.5<br />

53.5<br />

--<br />

5.4<br />

77.8<br />

1.3<br />

4.3<br />

11.2<br />

--<br />

14148 Btu/lll<br />

(32900 kJ/l..P)<br />

Free swelling index 3.5 3.5<br />

. . ----<br />

68


I<br />

I<br />

to <strong>the</strong> devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and <strong>the</strong> time <strong>at</strong> every one-quarter revolution <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> wet test meter (0.0125 cu ft, 354 cm3) was recorded. After five minutes, <strong>the</strong><br />

volume reading <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wet test meter was recorded <strong>at</strong> 3-minute intervals. Discrete<br />

values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> each gas were also read from a digital display and<br />

recorded by <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>or <strong>at</strong> intervals <strong>of</strong> 2.5 minutes, beginning <strong>at</strong> 5 minutes.<br />

The length <strong>of</strong> time <strong>of</strong> each experiment varied. In <strong>the</strong> experiments conducted<br />

<strong>at</strong> 800°C and 900°C, <strong>the</strong> 10 g <strong>coal</strong> sample was usually allowed to react until 80-<br />

90% conversion <strong>of</strong> carbon had been achieved. At 7OO0C, <strong>the</strong> experiments were termi-<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ed after approxim<strong>at</strong>ely two hours.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiment, flow <strong>of</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er to <strong>the</strong> steam vaporizer and flow<br />

<strong>of</strong> gases were termin<strong>at</strong>ed. All he<strong>at</strong>ers were shut down, and <strong>the</strong> reactor furnace was<br />

opened. When <strong>the</strong> appar<strong>at</strong>us was cool, <strong>the</strong> reactor was depressurized and opened.<br />

The char and ash were withdrawn and weighed. All condens<strong>at</strong>e was drained from <strong>the</strong><br />

trap and <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er recorded.<br />

medi<strong>at</strong>ely.<br />

The tar filter was removed and weighed im-<br />

Results<br />

In this study, <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following parameters on <strong>the</strong> steam gasific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Illinois No. 6 <strong>coal</strong> was investig<strong>at</strong>ed: <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> K2CO3 as a c<strong>at</strong>alyst;<br />

<strong>the</strong> partial <strong>pressures</strong> <strong>of</strong> steam, CO and H2; and reaction temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

2<br />

The<br />

total pressure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system was held <strong>at</strong> a constant value <strong>of</strong> 2.17 MPa (21.4 <strong>at</strong>m)<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> study. The total flowr<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> gases into <strong>the</strong> reaction zone was also<br />

kept fixed in each experiment <strong>at</strong> some value between 980 and 1020 sccm. Vari<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactant gas composition was accomplished by increasing <strong>the</strong> mass flowr<strong>at</strong>e<br />

<strong>of</strong> steam, C02 or H2 and simultaneously decreasing <strong>the</strong> mass flowr<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inert<br />

carrier gas, nitrogen. Nitrogen was both a diluent and a carrier gas for product<br />

removal.<br />

Runs were made <strong>at</strong> 700, 800 and 9OO0C with <strong>the</strong> pretre<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>coal</strong> and <strong>coal</strong> imp--*m<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

with 10 wt.% K2CO3. The effect <strong>of</strong> C02 concentr<strong>at</strong>ion on <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

K2C03-impregn<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>coal</strong> was studied <strong>at</strong> a constant steam partial pressure in a series<br />

<strong>of</strong> 6 runs. An additional 6 runs were made with a mixture <strong>of</strong> steam, N2, and H2 <strong>of</strong><br />

constant composition to evalu<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> hydrogen inhibition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> steam<br />

gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es. Runs were made <strong>at</strong> each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three temper<strong>at</strong>ures, 700, 800 and<br />

9OO0C, with both <strong>the</strong> pretre<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>coal</strong> and <strong>coal</strong> impregn<strong>at</strong>ed with 10 wt.% K2CO3.<br />

Using <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a <strong>of</strong> each experiment, a number <strong>of</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ions were performed.<br />

The gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e and carbon conversion were calcul<strong>at</strong>ed from a balance <strong>of</strong><br />

carbon-containing reaction products. The extent <strong>of</strong> reaction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> steam was<br />

determined from a balance <strong>of</strong> hydrogen-containing or oxygen-containing products.<br />

Reactant and product gas partial <strong>pressures</strong> were computed <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactor inlet<br />

and outlet. From <strong>the</strong>se partial <strong>pressures</strong>, <strong>the</strong> apparent equilibrium constants <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er-gas shift, carbon-steam, and carbon-HZ reactions were calcul<strong>at</strong>ed. Finnllv.<br />

product gas sums and overall m<strong>at</strong>erial balances were determined for each experiment.<br />

Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

The carbon gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e was generally high initially, decreased rapidly<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n slowly decreased throughout <strong>the</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> run. Fig. 2 shows<br />

typical results obtained <strong>at</strong> 70OoC with a c<strong>at</strong>alyzed <strong>coal</strong> sample. The initial peal:<br />

in <strong>the</strong> curve seemed to be caused by devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>, which was €01.-<br />

lowed by gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> base carbon in <strong>the</strong> sample.<br />

TO obtain a quantit<strong>at</strong>ive measure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction r<strong>at</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> shrinking, unreacted-<br />

core model for <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> complete gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a spherical, solid particle<br />

under conditions <strong>of</strong> chemical reaction r<strong>at</strong>e control was used to describe <strong>the</strong> carbon<br />

69


conversion-time d<strong>at</strong>a.* The integr<strong>at</strong>ed form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> equ<strong>at</strong>ion based on this model is<br />

where Xc = carbon conversion<br />

k = reaction r<strong>at</strong>e constant<br />

Cs = concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> gaseous reactant <strong>at</strong> particle surface<br />

n = reaction order<br />

pp = molar density <strong>of</strong> particle<br />

R = initial radius <strong>of</strong> particle<br />

t = time<br />

In general, <strong>the</strong> model did not fit <strong>the</strong> initial d<strong>at</strong>a where devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion was<br />

occurring, but a good fit was obtained over <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> carbon conversions from<br />

0.3 to 0.8. Applying <strong>the</strong> model to d<strong>at</strong>a from all <strong>the</strong> runs over <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> con-<br />

versions from 0.3 to 0.7 using linear regression analysis gave correl<strong>at</strong>ion coeffi-<br />

cients <strong>of</strong> 0.98 or larger except for two runs where <strong>the</strong> coefficients were 0.95 and<br />

0.91.<br />

To determine <strong>the</strong> reaction order with respect to steam concentr<strong>at</strong>ion, n, a multi-<br />

ple linear regression analysis was performed on <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a from <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion ex-<br />

periments where only steam and nitrogen were used. Within <strong>the</strong> standard error <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

estim<strong>at</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> overall reaction order was one for both K2C03-c<strong>at</strong>alyzed and unc<strong>at</strong>alyzed<br />

steam gasific<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Assuming first order kinetics and using <strong>the</strong> Arrhenius expression, <strong>the</strong> frequency<br />

factor and activ<strong>at</strong>ion energy were calcul<strong>at</strong>ed for both c<strong>at</strong>alyzed and unc<strong>at</strong>alyzed<br />

steam gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Illinois No. 6 <strong>coal</strong>. The derived reaction r<strong>at</strong>e parameters<br />

are summarized in Table 2. As expected, <strong>the</strong> overall activ<strong>at</strong>ion energy was some-<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> lower for c<strong>at</strong>alyzed gasific<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Apparent Equilibrium Constant s<br />

The value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> apparent w<strong>at</strong>er-gas shift equilibrium constant, KS = (pC02)<br />

(pE2)/(pH20)(pCO), tended to decrease from <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> peak gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e until<br />

devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion was complete. From <strong>the</strong> time devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion was complete until<br />

<strong>the</strong> carbon had completely gasified, <strong>the</strong> value observed was approxim<strong>at</strong>ely constant.<br />

The value <strong>of</strong> KS for each experiment,over <strong>the</strong> time for which it was approxim<strong>at</strong>ely con-<br />

stant, is compared in Fig. 3 with a liter<strong>at</strong>ure value <strong>of</strong> KS over <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong><br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ures from 7OO0C to 900°C.<br />

Table 2. P.rrhenius parameters for steam gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Illinois No. 6 <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

M<strong>at</strong>erial Standard error Correl<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Gasified Parameter Estim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> estim<strong>at</strong>e Coefficient<br />

10% K2CO3- Activ<strong>at</strong>ion 133.7 kJ/mol 13.8 kJ/mol 0.931<br />

impregn<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>coal</strong> energy (31.7 kcal/mol) (3.3 kcal/mol)<br />

Frequency 1.32 x lo8 4.5<br />

factor, min-l<br />

Oxygen-pretre<strong>at</strong>ed Activ<strong>at</strong>ion 151.5 kJ/mol 6.3 kJ/mol 0.986<br />

<strong>coal</strong> (unc<strong>at</strong>alyzed) energy (36.2 kcal/mol) (1.5 kcal/mol)<br />

Frequency<br />

-1<br />

factor, min<br />

2.94 x lo8 2.1<br />

*For a deriv<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model, see Levenspiel, 0. 1972. Chemical Reaction Engineering.<br />

2nd ed. Wiley, New York.<br />

70


The values <strong>of</strong> KS fall both above and below <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical curve. Some devia-<br />

tion is due to <strong>the</strong> sensitivity <strong>of</strong> KS to errors in calcul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> product gas partial<br />

<strong>pressures</strong>. At 700°C, <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e was slow and steam conversion was slight.<br />

Therefore, equilibrium <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er-gas shift reaction may not have been reached.<br />

At 800°C and 9OOOC apparent values <strong>of</strong> KS for both c<strong>at</strong>alyzed and unc<strong>at</strong>alyzed gasifica-<br />

tion are closer to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical curve than were <strong>the</strong> values <strong>at</strong> 7OO0C. If a 20%<br />

margin <strong>of</strong> uncertainty is assumed, <strong>the</strong> KS values <strong>of</strong> most experiments <strong>at</strong> 9oo°C indi-<br />

c<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> <strong>at</strong>tainment <strong>of</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er-gas shift equilibrium.<br />

In contrast, <strong>the</strong> carbon-steam and carbon-H2 reactions did not appear to be in<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmodynamic equilibrium. Nei<strong>the</strong>r equilibrium constants reached a consistent value<br />

<strong>at</strong> any time during <strong>the</strong> burn<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carbon and both values were <strong>at</strong> least an order<br />

<strong>of</strong> magnitude smaller than <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>the</strong>oretical value during <strong>the</strong> char gasific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

period.<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> C02 on <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

To determine <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> Cog partial pressure, a series <strong>of</strong> 5 runs was made<br />

<strong>at</strong> constant steam flowr<strong>at</strong>e while varying <strong>the</strong> C02 concentr<strong>at</strong>ion. These runs were<br />

carried out with 10 wt.% K2C03-impregn<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>coal</strong> <strong>at</strong> 800°C and <strong>the</strong> C02 partial pressure<br />

was varied from 97 kF’a (0.96 am) to 576 kPa (5.68 <strong>at</strong>m) using a constant steam<br />

pressure <strong>of</strong> 1.35 MPa (13.3 <strong>at</strong>m).<br />

The calcul<strong>at</strong>ed kinetic constants for <strong>the</strong>se runs were generally somewh<strong>at</strong> lower<br />

than <strong>the</strong> value determined with pure steam. However, <strong>the</strong> devi<strong>at</strong>ion was within <strong>the</strong><br />

expected range introduced by experimental errors. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> only conclusion<br />

th<strong>at</strong> may be drawn from this set <strong>of</strong> experiments is th<strong>at</strong> C02 concentr<strong>at</strong>ion, over <strong>the</strong><br />

range used, exerted a rel<strong>at</strong>ively small effect on <strong>the</strong> steam gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

KzCOg-impregn<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>coal</strong> when compared with <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> steam concentr<strong>at</strong>ion and<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> H2 on <strong>the</strong> reaction r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

Runs were made <strong>at</strong> 700, 800 and 900°C with both 10 wt.% K2COg-impregn<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>coal</strong><br />

and untre<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>coal</strong>. All 6 runs were done with <strong>the</strong> same hydrogen and steam partial<br />

<strong>pressures</strong>, namely 428 kPa (4.22 <strong>at</strong>m) and 1.69 MPa (16.7 <strong>at</strong>m), respectively.<br />

Hydrogen inhibited <strong>the</strong> steam gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> both <strong>coal</strong> samples. The results<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiments with <strong>the</strong> K2COj-impregn<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>coal</strong> showed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> magnitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> this inhibition decreased with increasing temper<strong>at</strong>ure for <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyzed reaction.<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> k values obtained with and without H2 present show th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io<br />

<strong>of</strong> $201H2/~20 increased from 0.13 <strong>at</strong> 7OO0C to 0.38 <strong>at</strong> 900°C. The r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> k<br />

values was higher for unc<strong>at</strong>alyzed <strong>coal</strong> and did not change system<strong>at</strong>ically. This r<strong>at</strong>io<br />

was 0.51 <strong>at</strong> 7OO0C, 0.27 <strong>at</strong> 8OOOC and 0.47 <strong>at</strong> 90OoC. At <strong>at</strong>mospheric pressure, <strong>the</strong><br />

inhibition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carbon-steam reaction by hydrogen is expected to decrease with increasing<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ive magnitudes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elementary activ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

energies. At higher <strong>pressures</strong>, <strong>the</strong> trend is probably more complic<strong>at</strong>ed, since <strong>the</strong><br />

reaction steps leading to CH4 production are significant. CHq gener<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es were<br />

approxim<strong>at</strong>ely <strong>the</strong> same in <strong>the</strong> char gasific<strong>at</strong>ion periods for reactions both in pure<br />

steam and in <strong>the</strong> steam/H2 mixture. CH4 represented a gre<strong>at</strong>er percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total<br />

product gas in <strong>the</strong> experiments with <strong>the</strong> steam/H2 mixture than in those with pure steam.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The overall gasific<strong>at</strong>ion reaction was found to be first order with respect to<br />

steam concentr<strong>at</strong>ion, with <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e being unaffected by C02 and inhibited by hydrogen.<br />

The vari<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e with carbon conversion was described by <strong>the</strong> un-<br />

reacted, shrinking-core model, with <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e constants for runs c<strong>at</strong>alyzed by K2C03<br />

being about four times those for unc<strong>at</strong>alyzed runs. The activ<strong>at</strong>ion energies for <strong>the</strong>


c<strong>at</strong>alyzed and unc<strong>at</strong>alyzed runs were 134 and 152 W/mol, respectively. The principal<br />

products <strong>of</strong> both c<strong>at</strong>alyzed and unc<strong>at</strong>alyzed steam gasific<strong>at</strong>ion were H2 and Cog. The<br />

w<strong>at</strong>er-gas shift reaction reached equilibrium for most experiments <strong>at</strong> 900°C and some<br />

<strong>at</strong> 8OO0C, with <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> K2CO3 having little effect on <strong>the</strong> approach to equilibrium.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

The experimental portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study was carried out with <strong>the</strong> cooper<strong>at</strong>ion and<br />

financial support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United St<strong>at</strong>es Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, using <strong>the</strong> facilities <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center in Bruceton, Pa. Mr. John W. Courts assisted<br />

in <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental appar<strong>at</strong>us.<br />

MIXING MEIER<br />

FILTER<br />

PRECISION<br />

METERING<br />

WATER<br />

RESERVOIR<br />

U<br />

1 REACTOR<br />

IFURNACE TAR<br />

FILIER<br />

‘EXIT<br />

IGAS I 1<br />

-HEATERJ __ I<br />

I<br />

J<br />

OTTOM FLANGE HEATER<br />

I<br />

CONDENSATE<br />

- FLOW OF REACTANIS AND PRODUCTS<br />

CARBON DIOXIDE __ HEATING ZONE<br />

OR OIHER GAS PI PRESSURE INOICAIDR<br />

FLO~ CONTROLLERS<br />

SOURCE W SIIUIOFF VALVE<br />

f CONTROL (NEEOLE) VALVE<br />

Figure 1. Flow diagram for experimental appar<strong>at</strong>us<br />

72<br />

WASTE


I<br />

!<br />

R<br />

a<br />

+<br />

.r.<br />

N N<br />

m<br />

-<br />

0<br />

N 0<br />

7<br />

9<br />

Ln<br />

0<br />

7<br />

0<br />

0<br />

m-<br />

??<br />

2s<br />

W<br />

95<br />

0<br />

w w<br />

e+<br />

Ln<br />

d<br />

9<br />

0 m<br />

0<br />

Ln<br />

7<br />

9<br />

3


CATALYTIC EFFECTS OF ALKALI METAL SALTS IN THE GASIFICATION OF COAL CHAR<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

D. W. McKee, C. L. Spiro, P. G. Kosky and E. J. Lamby<br />

General Electric Corpor<strong>at</strong>e Research & Development<br />

Schenectady, NY 12301<br />

Coal is a complex and variable carbonaceous rock which is composed basically <strong>of</strong> two<br />

types <strong>of</strong> m<strong>at</strong>erials. The macerals or carbonaceous remains <strong>of</strong> plants constitute <strong>the</strong> organic<br />

fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>, with <strong>the</strong> remainder comprising minerals or inorganic impurities present in <strong>the</strong><br />

parent veget<strong>at</strong>ion or deposited subsequently. The major mineral components <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> include<br />

clays, alkaline carbon<strong>at</strong>es, metallic sulfides, oxides and quarttl) but <strong>the</strong> minor and trace<br />

impurities may include most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Periodic Table.<br />

The [f!@ivity and <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> can be pr<strong>of</strong>oundly influenced by <strong>the</strong>se inorganic<br />

impurities. Currently, <strong>the</strong>re is interest not only in <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> mineral m<strong>at</strong>ter on <strong>the</strong><br />

chemical behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> but also in <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> adding c<strong>at</strong>alysts to <strong>coal</strong> in order to lower<br />

<strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure required for gasific<strong>at</strong>ion processes. For example, it has been known for over<br />

one hundred years th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> afi char towards steam is promoted by <strong>the</strong><br />

addition <strong>of</strong> alkalis, such as caustic soda or lime. There are a number <strong>of</strong> processes under<br />

development today which utilize(& c<strong>at</strong>alytic <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> alkali carbon<strong>at</strong>es to improve <strong>the</strong><br />

reactivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> in <strong>the</strong> gasifier. Earlier work has shown th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> carbon<strong>at</strong>es and oxides <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> alkali and alkaline earth metals are among <strong>the</strong> mCtF'_flfFtive c<strong>at</strong>alysts for <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

carbonaceous m<strong>at</strong>erials in steam and carbon dio<br />

However, <strong>the</strong>re is still no generally<br />

accepted explan<strong>at</strong>ion for <strong>the</strong>se c<strong>at</strong>alytic effects. Ti9<br />

This paper describes <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> a continuing study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alytic behavior <strong>of</strong> salts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> alkali metals in <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> char by steam and C02. The main purpose <strong>of</strong> this<br />

work is to investig<strong>at</strong>e possible mechanisms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysis and to elucid<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong><br />

mineral impurities on <strong>the</strong> reactivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> char. For this purpose <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> a typical<br />

char and a pure graphite powder have been compared in <strong>the</strong> presence and absence <strong>of</strong> added<br />

alkali c<strong>at</strong>alysts. In a companion paper (13), <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> char pyrolysis temper<strong>at</strong>ure, surface<br />

area and mode <strong>of</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyst addition are described.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

M<strong>at</strong>erials<br />

The char used in this work was prepared from a large sample <strong>of</strong> Illinois i/6 HVB bituminous<br />

<strong>coal</strong> from Inland Mine #I, Sessor, Illinois. Proxim<strong>at</strong>e and ultim<strong>at</strong>e analyses <strong>of</strong> this <strong>coal</strong> sample<br />

are given in Table 1. The results <strong>of</strong> x-ray diffraction on ash residues after low temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

ashing (LTA) showed major amounts <strong>of</strong> kaolinite and minor amounts <strong>of</strong> quartz and pyrite.<br />

Initially <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> was coarse ground, homogenized, vacuum dried <strong>at</strong> lOS0C and <strong>the</strong>n stored<br />

in a vacuum desicc<strong>at</strong>or. In some cases salt c<strong>at</strong>alysts were added to <strong>coal</strong> samples before<br />

pyrolysis. Thus, about 15 g. <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dried <strong>coal</strong> was micronized in a nitrogen-driven fluid grinding<br />

mill to give a particle size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> several microns. A known amount, generally 5<br />

percent, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dried powder salt, e.g., K CO , CH3COOK, was <strong>the</strong>n added to <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and <strong>the</strong><br />

mixture rolled for four hours in a rolling%ill! The doped samples were <strong>the</strong>n placed in alumina<br />

crucibles and pyrolyzed in nitrogen <strong>at</strong> 7OO0C for 2 hours. Observed weight losses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

74


samples during this pyrolysis were <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> 30 percent. In o<strong>the</strong>r cases <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysts were<br />

added after charring <strong>at</strong> 7OO0C by mixing weighed amounts <strong>of</strong> salts and chgr toge<strong>the</strong>r in a Fisher<br />

Minimill. The char samples had surface areas <strong>of</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 280 m /g., as determined by<br />

C02 adsorption <strong>at</strong> 195'K.<br />

Spectroscopic grade graphite powder (-325 mesh, Type UCP-ZR, highest 9urity) was obtained<br />

from Ultra Carbon Corp. This m<strong>at</strong>erial had an initial surface area <strong>of</strong> 7.5 m /g., as determined<br />

by nitrogen adsorption <strong>at</strong> -195OC.<br />

The salt additives were Analytical Reagent or Certified ACS Grade m<strong>at</strong>erials and were<br />

used without fur<strong>the</strong>r tre<strong>at</strong>ment. The gaseous <strong>at</strong>mospheres used included Linde Instrument<br />

Grade carbon dioxide and Linde Ultra-High Purity Grade helium. For experiments in steam<br />

(w<strong>at</strong>er vapor), <strong>the</strong> helium was passed through a distilled w<strong>at</strong>er bubbler <strong>at</strong> 25OC to give a w<strong>at</strong>er<br />

vapor pressure <strong>of</strong> 23 mm. (3.1 kPa) in <strong>the</strong> gas stream.<br />

Procedure<br />

Proxim<strong>at</strong>e Analysis<br />

% Moisture % Vol<strong>at</strong>iles % Fixed C BTU/lb<br />

As Received 0.72 9.68 39.45 50.15 12979<br />

Dry Basis 9.75 39.74 50.51 13073<br />

Ultim<strong>at</strong>e Analysis<br />

Free Swelling Index = 5<br />

% Moisture %c 'j%J % 0 (diff.)<br />

As Received 0.72 73.06 5.04 1.68 0.39 1.20 8.23<br />

Dry Basis 73.59 5.08 1.69 0.39 1.21 8.29<br />

Table I: Analyses <strong>of</strong> Illinois #6 Coal Sample<br />

Thermogravimetric studies and measurements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> iso<strong>the</strong>rmal kinetics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyzed<br />

gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> char and graphite in CO and w<strong>at</strong>er vapor were carried in <strong>the</strong> Mettler<br />

Thermoanalyzer-2 autom<strong>at</strong>ically recordin% balance as previously described?Y') Kinetic measurements<br />

<strong>at</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> constant temper<strong>at</strong>ures between 600 and 1000°$ were made on 200 rng.<br />

samples <strong>of</strong>-re doped carbons, using flowing C02 <strong>at</strong> 1 <strong>at</strong>m. (1.02 x 10 kPa) and a flow r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

200 ml.min . Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion in w<strong>at</strong>er vapor was accomplished in p w<strong>at</strong>er vapor-s<strong>at</strong>ur<strong>at</strong>ed helium<br />

stream (23 mm. H20, 3.1 kPa) <strong>at</strong> a flow r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 300 ml.min- . Kinetic d<strong>at</strong>a were generally<br />

plotted in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> Arrhenius plots (r<strong>at</strong>es vs. I/T°K), <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>at</strong> each<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure being derived experimentally from <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

R<strong>at</strong>e (min-l) = dW/dt<br />

wO<br />

where w is <strong>the</strong> initial weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample. In all cases, in order to minimize <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong><br />

changing'surface area and c<strong>at</strong>alyst concentr<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>the</strong> total wight loss during gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

each sample was kept below 15 percent.<br />

75


%me <strong>the</strong>rmogravimetric measurements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactions between <strong>the</strong> salts and <strong>the</strong><br />

carbons and between <strong>the</strong> salts and selected minerals were carried out b4; he<strong>at</strong>ipg appropri<strong>at</strong>e<br />

mixtures in <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmobalance <strong>at</strong> a linearly increasing temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> 10 Cmin- using flowing<br />

<strong>at</strong>mospheres <strong>of</strong> pure dry helium or carbon dioxide.<br />

RESULTS<br />

C<strong>at</strong>alyzed Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion in Steam<br />

As expected, <strong>the</strong> carbon<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkali metals proved to be effective c<strong>at</strong>alysts for <strong>the</strong><br />

gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> both char and graphite in steam. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> char, <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> 5<br />

percent by weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> salts resulted in slightly more active chars when <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysts were<br />

introduced prior to charring <strong>at</strong> 7OO0C ra<strong>the</strong>r than physically mixed with <strong>the</strong> char after charring<br />

(13). In general, <strong>the</strong> reactivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> doped chars in steam decreased on successive <strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

cycles and with time <strong>at</strong> a constant gasific<strong>at</strong>ion temper<strong>at</strong>ure. This effect will be discussed in<br />

more detail below. Figure 1 shows Arrhenius plots (gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es vs. I/T°K) for <strong>the</strong> 70OoC<br />

char doped with 5 percent by weight <strong>of</strong> alkali carbon<strong>at</strong>es after charring. These d<strong>at</strong>a were<br />

obtained during <strong>the</strong> second <strong>the</strong>rmal ciygij, in each case. A similar order <strong>of</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alytic activity<br />

was observed previously for graphite, although in this case Na CO was slightly less active<br />

3<br />

than K CO . Pure graphite was considerably less reactive than &e unc<strong>at</strong>alyzed char sample,<br />

howevz thz c<strong>at</strong>alytic effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> added salts were more marked in <strong>the</strong> former case, so th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyzed gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es in steam were quite similar for both graphite and char over <strong>the</strong><br />

600-9OO0C temper<strong>at</strong>ure range. Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es for graphite doped with I and 5 wt. percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkali salts were about <strong>the</strong> same, whereas with <strong>the</strong> char a progressive increase in r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

was observed with increasing carbon<strong>at</strong>e concentr<strong>at</strong>ion up to 20 weight percent, as shown in<br />

Figure 2. This marked difference in behavior between graphite and char was probably rel<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

to <strong>the</strong> large difference in surface area between <strong>the</strong> two m<strong>at</strong>erials although <strong>the</strong> active site area<br />

was not known in ei<strong>the</strong>r case. However, with a series <strong>of</strong> chars, prepared in <strong>the</strong> presence and<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> added c<strong>at</strong>alysts, <strong>the</strong>re was no significant correl<strong>at</strong>ion between reactivity and surface<br />

area. In fact, surface areas were generally somewh<strong>at</strong> smaller for c<strong>at</strong>alyst-doped samples than<br />

for unc<strong>at</strong>alyzed chars. Also <strong>the</strong>re was little differenff3jn gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es when <strong>the</strong> char<br />

particles were ground from ca. 1 mm. size to ca. I pm. These results indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> surface<br />

areas and particle size are not important parameters in determining char reactivity, <strong>at</strong> least for<br />

chars <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same type and <strong>the</strong> same he<strong>at</strong> tre<strong>at</strong>ment history. In <strong>the</strong> steam environment,<br />

Li CO was clearly <strong>the</strong> most active c<strong>at</strong>alyst, with Na CO and K CO exhibiting somewh<strong>at</strong><br />

IoJer activity. O<strong>the</strong>r additives, such as KN03 and K$O: also st?owea substantial c<strong>at</strong>alytic<br />

activity, whereas KCI was somewh<strong>at</strong> less active.<br />

As noted above, <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyzed char samples showed a progressive loss in reactivity<br />

towards steam during <strong>the</strong> experiments. This phenomenon, which was not observed with<br />

graphite, was studied in some detail. Figure 3 shows kinetic d<strong>at</strong>a obtained with a char sample<br />

doped with 5 weight percent K CO during three successive <strong>the</strong>rmal cycles. The initially high<br />

gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es in steam fell%y 2 factor <strong>of</strong> about two on <strong>the</strong> second cycle with progressively<br />

smaller deactiv<strong>at</strong>ion effects on subsequent cycles. Figure 4 shows <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> iso<strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e measurements obtained <strong>at</strong> 800°C for char samples initially doped with 2, 5 and 10 percent<br />

K2C03. In all three cases a rapid drop in gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e occurred during <strong>the</strong> first hour with<br />

more gradual decreases during <strong>the</strong> subsequent four hours <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiments. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

sample containing 10% KZCO , <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e was so high th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e began to<br />

decrease after about 3 hours decause <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> contact between <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyst phase and <strong>the</strong><br />

residual char substr<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

In steam (w<strong>at</strong>er vapor) c<strong>at</strong>alyst deactiv<strong>at</strong>ion was observed for every c<strong>at</strong>alyst additive<br />

tested, regardless <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> salt was added before or after charring. Figure 5 shows d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

obtained from a char sample to which 5 wt. % potassium acet<strong>at</strong>e had been added before<br />

76


charring <strong>at</strong> 70OoC. Again a marked progressive loss in activity was found on successive <strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

cycles, accompanied by an increase in <strong>the</strong> apparent activ<strong>at</strong>ion energy from 18 to 51 Kcal/mole<br />

during <strong>the</strong> four cycles shown.<br />

AS it was found th<strong>at</strong> this progressive deactiv<strong>at</strong>ion did not occur during <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyzed<br />

steam gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> graphite, it appeared unlikely th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect was due to sintering,<br />

agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion or vaporiz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> salt c<strong>at</strong>alyst. It seemed more probable th<strong>at</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyst<br />

deactiv<strong>at</strong>ion was rel<strong>at</strong>ed to reaction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkali salts with minerals such as quartz, clay,<br />

kaolin, and pyrite present in <strong>the</strong> char samples. Some experiments were <strong>the</strong>refore carried out in<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmobalance, using mixtures <strong>of</strong> K co with <strong>the</strong>se mineral species, to determine if solid<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e reactions might occur <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures<br />

2 3<br />

in <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion range (600-10OO0C).<br />

Figure 6 shows <strong>the</strong>rmograms (weight change vs. temper<strong>at</strong>ure) for 200 mg. pure K2C0<br />

(dashed curve) and for a mixture <strong>of</strong> 200 mg. K COj and 200 mg. powderedguartz (solid curvej<br />

on he<strong>at</strong>ing in a stream <strong>of</strong> dry helium during a hear temper<strong>at</strong>ure rise <strong>of</strong> 10 C/min. Following<br />

an initial dehydr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> 10O-15O0C, <strong>the</strong> pure salt showed no fur<strong>the</strong>r weight loss on he<strong>at</strong>ing to<br />

98OoC and a slight loss <strong>at</strong> higher temper<strong>at</strong>ures due to vaporiz<strong>at</strong>ion above <strong>the</strong> melting point. On<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> mixture <strong>of</strong> salt and quartz lost weight rapidly <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures above 75OoC,<br />

probably as a result <strong>of</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> C02 by reactions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type<br />

K2C03 + Si02 = K2Si03 + C02<br />

A variety <strong>of</strong> silic<strong>at</strong>e-forming reactions are in fact possible. The extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se reactions <strong>at</strong> a<br />

given temper<strong>at</strong>ure and <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> inception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solid st<strong>at</strong>e reactions would be<br />

expected to depend on <strong>the</strong> particle size and interfacial contact area between <strong>the</strong> solid phases.<br />

Also <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> CO in <strong>the</strong> gas phase would tend to suppress <strong>the</strong>se reactions. Similar<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmogravimetric d<strong>at</strong>a f& (A) 200 mg. pure K2C0 , (8) 200 mg. <strong>of</strong> powdered illite clay, and a<br />

mixture <strong>of</strong> 200 mg. K CO and 200 mg. illite, are saown in Figure 7. The curve labelled (A+B)<br />

is <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> curves ?A) 2nd (B) and represents <strong>the</strong> weight changes expected for a salt-illite<br />

mixture if no reaction occurred between <strong>the</strong> two phases. It is evident from <strong>the</strong> lower solid<br />

curve in Figure 7 th<strong>at</strong> a reaction between <strong>the</strong> clay and <strong>the</strong> salt took place above 7OO0C with a<br />

continuous loss in weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample, probably as a result <strong>of</strong> liber<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> C02. The<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mineral illite, a complex aluminosilic<strong>at</strong>e, is, however, indefinite, so no<br />

equ<strong>at</strong>ion can be written for this reaction. Illite, however, is an important major mineral<br />

constituent in many <strong>coal</strong>s. Similar d<strong>at</strong>a for kaolin-K CO mixtures are shown in Figure 8. A<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> curve (A+B) for kaolin t K CO with ni redction and curve C, <strong>the</strong> experimental<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmogram for <strong>the</strong> mixture, indic<strong>at</strong>es tz<strong>at</strong> 2 reaction between <strong>the</strong> mineral and <strong>the</strong> salt took<br />

place <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures above 7OO0C with <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> a vol<strong>at</strong>ile product, most likely C02. In a<br />

CO <strong>at</strong>mosphere, this reaction was inhibited (curve D), but even in this case a marked loss in<br />

2<br />

weight occurred above 90OoC. A possible reaction between <strong>the</strong> salt and <strong>the</strong> kaolin is<br />

A12Si205(0H)4 + K2C03 = 2KAISi04 + 2H20 + C02<br />

The expected weight loss for <strong>the</strong> completion <strong>of</strong> this reaction is 60 mg, which corresponds<br />

closely to <strong>the</strong> experimental loss in weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kaolin-salt mixture between 650 and llOOoc.<br />

The reaction <strong>of</strong> potassium salts with <strong>the</strong> mineral constituents <strong>of</strong> fly ash to Droduce <strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>erinsoluble<br />

minerai k~ijlite (KAISi04) has been reported by Karr et. al. to occur in <strong>the</strong> presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> steam <strong>at</strong> 85OoC.<br />

C<strong>at</strong>alyzed Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion in C02<br />

As expected, <strong>the</strong> alkali metal carbon<strong>at</strong>es were found to be active c<strong>at</strong>alysts for<br />

gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> r in CO . Results for <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyzed gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> graphite have been<br />

reported previously.flfi) With zoal char <strong>the</strong> kinetic d<strong>at</strong>a were much more reproducible in CO<br />

2<br />

77


than in steam. Figure 9 shows d<strong>at</strong>a obtained for a char-5% K CO Qhe same sample as th<strong>at</strong><br />

used in Figure 3) on gasific<strong>at</strong>ion in 1 <strong>at</strong>m. C02 between 600 a8d 980 C. In this case, during<br />

four successive <strong>the</strong>rmal cycles <strong>the</strong> kinetic d<strong>at</strong>a were remarkably constant, with only a slight<br />

decrease in r<strong>at</strong>es between <strong>the</strong> first and second cycles. The apparent activ<strong>at</strong>ion energy for this<br />

series <strong>of</strong> experiments was 49.3 Kcal/mole. Similar d<strong>at</strong>a for a char sample to which 5 % K co<br />

had been added before <strong>the</strong> 700°C charring step are shown in Figure 10. Again, following a {mad<br />

reduction in gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es between <strong>the</strong> first and second cycles, <strong>the</strong> reactivity ota fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

cycling was reproducible, with an apparent activ<strong>at</strong>ion energy <strong>of</strong> 53.8 Kcal/mole. Comparison<br />

with Figure 9 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alytic effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> K CO was similar regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> salt was added before or after charring. Similar J<strong>at</strong>alor a CH3COOK-doped char<br />

sample are shown in Figure 11. In this case also, following a slight reduction in reactivity<br />

between cycles I and 2, subsequent kinetic d<strong>at</strong>a were quite reproducible. Comparison with<br />

Figure 5 shows <strong>the</strong> marked difference in behavior <strong>of</strong> this doped char sample in <strong>the</strong> two gaseous<br />

environments.<br />

Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion d<strong>at</strong>a in C02 for char doped with 5% Li CO Na CO and K CO (added<br />

prior to charring) are shown in Figure 12. In this envi?onrr?&t dierd was nb si2nificant<br />

difference in activity between <strong>the</strong> three salts when compared on a weight % basis. The effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> increasing concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> K CO (added prior to charring) on <strong>the</strong> C02 gasific<strong>at</strong>ion kinetics<br />

is illustr<strong>at</strong>ed in Figure 13. ReagtivAy generally increased with K CO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>at</strong> least<br />

up to <strong>the</strong> 20% level, however, <strong>the</strong> effect on apparent activ<strong>at</strong>ion eneqgy<br />

3<br />

was small.<br />

Reaction between Alkali Carbon<strong>at</strong>es and Carbon<br />

When K CO is he<strong>at</strong>ed with carbon in an inert <strong>at</strong>mosphere, a solid st<strong>at</strong>e reaction takes<br />

place between2 60d and 9OO0C, depending on <strong>the</strong> particle size and extent <strong>of</strong> physical contact<br />

between <strong>the</strong> two phases. The products <strong>of</strong> this r tion are CO and potassium vapor which<br />

sublimes into <strong>the</strong> cooler parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> appar<strong>at</strong>usfB Figure 14 shows <strong>the</strong>rmograms (weight<br />

changes vs. temper<strong>at</strong>ure) for K2CO3_char and K2C03-graphite mixtures on he<strong>at</strong>ing in dry<br />

helium in <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmobalance <strong>at</strong> an increasing temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> 10°C/min. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong><br />

graphite, loss in weight became marked above 800°C and <strong>the</strong> reaction was essentially<br />

completed <strong>at</strong> 1000°C. The char had a much larger surface area than <strong>the</strong> graphite and reaction<br />

with <strong>the</strong> salt began <strong>at</strong> about 600OC. This solid st<strong>at</strong>e reaction, which takes place in <strong>the</strong><br />

gasific<strong>at</strong>ion range, is believed to play tyoiwortant role in <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> carbon with C02<br />

as discussed in <strong>the</strong> next section.<br />

or steam in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> K2C0 '<br />

3<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The reactivities <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> chars are obviously strongly influenced by a number <strong>of</strong> factors<br />

such as charring temper<strong>at</strong>ure and <strong>the</strong>rmal history, pore size distribution and <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong><br />

ubiquitous mineral impurities. However, <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alytic behavior <strong>of</strong> additives such as <strong>the</strong> alkali<br />

metal carbon<strong>at</strong>es is similar for char and graphite and <strong>the</strong> same mechanisms probably oper<strong>at</strong>e in<br />

both cases.<br />

The main effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> salt c<strong>at</strong>alysts (Figures 1,2,12,13) in both gasific<strong>at</strong>ion reactions is<br />

to increase <strong>the</strong> pre-exponential factor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e equ<strong>at</strong>ion. Changes in <strong>the</strong> apparent activ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

energy are small from c<strong>at</strong>alyst to c<strong>at</strong>alyst and on increasing <strong>the</strong> salt concentr<strong>at</strong>ion. The most<br />

likely explan<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> this effect is th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> salt reacts with <strong>the</strong> char substr<strong>at</strong>e to produce active<br />

sites on <strong>the</strong> surface where gasific<strong>at</strong>ion can proceed. Increasing <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> salt present<br />

increases <strong>the</strong> effective concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se active sites up to <strong>the</strong> point <strong>at</strong> which <strong>the</strong> surface<br />

becomes s<strong>at</strong>ur<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />

A plausible mechanism which has been proposed previo~sly(~~,~~~~~)<br />

to account for <strong>the</strong><br />

c<strong>at</strong>alytic effects <strong>of</strong> Na2C03 and K2C0 in <strong>the</strong>se reactions is shown in Table 11. A common first<br />

3


step, reaction (I) is suggested for both reactions, with <strong>the</strong> subsequent steps being different for<br />

C02 and H20 as <strong>the</strong> gaseous oxidant.<br />

C - C02 REACTION<br />

C - H20 REACTION<br />

M2C03 + 2C = 2M + 3CO<br />

2M + co2 = M20 + co<br />

M20 + C02 = M2C03<br />

c + co2 = 2co<br />

M2C03 + 2C = 2M + 3CO<br />

2M + 2H20 = 2MOH + H2<br />

2MOH + CO = M2C03 + H2<br />

C + H 20 = CO + H2<br />

Table n: Carbon Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion C<strong>at</strong>alyzed by Na2C03 or K2C03<br />

Although reaction (I) possesses a positive free energy change <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures in <strong>the</strong> 600-<br />

1000°C range, <strong>at</strong> low partial <strong>pressures</strong> <strong>of</strong> CO <strong>the</strong> reaction can proceed rapidly, as shown by <strong>the</strong><br />

TGA d<strong>at</strong>a in Figure IS. Figure IS shows <strong>the</strong> equilibrium stability regions <strong>of</strong> K C03 and K(P, for<br />

reaction (l), calcul<strong>at</strong>ed from free energy d<strong>at</strong>a, as functions <strong>of</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>urg and <strong>the</strong> partial<br />

<strong>pressures</strong> (in <strong>at</strong>mospheres) <strong>of</strong> K(g) and CO. The sloping lines <strong>at</strong> each temper<strong>at</strong>ure separ<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong><br />

region <strong>of</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> %C03 (upper left) from th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> K(g) (lower right). An overall gasific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 5 x IO- min- (about <strong>the</strong> maximu3<strong>at</strong>tained in this study <strong>at</strong> 9OO0C) would give an<br />

ambient partial pressure <strong>of</strong> CO <strong>of</strong> about 10 <strong>at</strong>m. above <strong>the</strong> gasifying char sample. At this<br />

value <strong>of</strong> Pco, and with a similar value <strong>of</strong> PK, Figure 15 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> reaction (1) would be<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmodynamically possible for all temper<strong>at</strong>ures above about 800°C. At a temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong><br />

6OO0C <strong>the</strong> measured gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e, and <strong>the</strong> ambient value <strong>of</strong> P are about two orders <strong>of</strong><br />

magnitude ess than <strong>at</strong> 9OO0C and Figure 15 shows th<strong>at</strong> reaction (IF?: again possible for P<br />

?l<br />

Pco = IO- <strong>at</strong>m. The steady st<strong>at</strong>e values <strong>of</strong> P reaction will in fact be much less than $ =<br />

because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> reactions (2) and [f& DiFect evidence th<strong>at</strong> reaction (3) does oc%?<br />

has recently been obtained by Wood et al., using high temper<strong>at</strong>ure Knudsen cell mass<br />

spectrometry. On he<strong>at</strong>ing K C03 and carbon toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> 500°C and above, <strong>the</strong><br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> K vapor and 20 could be measured. Thus, reaction (I), which is inhibited by<br />

increasing amounts <strong>of</strong> CO in <strong>the</strong> gas phase, is probably <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e determining step in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion reactions c<strong>at</strong>alyzed by Na2C0 and K CO . Reactions (2) and (3) and also (4)<br />

and (5) have large neg<strong>at</strong>ive free energy values a? gasifi&ti<strong>of</strong>i temper<strong>at</strong>ures and are thus favored<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmodynamically, although little is known about <strong>the</strong>ir kinetics.<br />

A somewh<strong>at</strong> different p<strong>at</strong>hway probably oper<strong>at</strong>es in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactions c<strong>at</strong>alyzed by<br />

Li CO as Li 0 is more stable than <strong>the</strong> oxides <strong>of</strong> Na and K, also Li CO is more easily<br />

hy&olyzed<br />

3<br />

to Aydroxide than <strong>the</strong> carbon<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> Na and K. A possible sequegce Jf reactions th<strong>at</strong><br />

might be involved in <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysis process in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Li CO is shown in Table Ill below.<br />

Evidence for <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se individual reactions is &ill,%owever, indirect and future<br />

efforts will be directed to exploring <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alytic process by <strong>the</strong> aid <strong>of</strong> isotopic tracers and in<br />

determining <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ive r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elementary steps involved in <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyzed gasific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

process.<br />

79<br />

(2)<br />

(3)<br />

(1)<br />

(4)<br />

(5)


C - C02 REACTION<br />

C - H20 REACTION<br />

Li2C03 + C = LizO t ZCO<br />

Li20 + C02 = Li2C03<br />

c + co* = 2co<br />

C + HzO = CO + H2<br />

Table IIi: Carbon Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion C<strong>at</strong>alyzed by Li2C03<br />

The above mechanistic schemes, although feasible for <strong>the</strong> alkali carbon<strong>at</strong>es, cannot<br />

readily explain <strong>the</strong> observed c<strong>at</strong>alytic activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkali halides in <strong>the</strong>se reactions. Such<br />

salts as KF, NaF and LiCl have been found to be moder<strong>at</strong>ely active c<strong>at</strong>alysts for <strong>the</strong><br />

gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> both char and graphite in steam and CO The route by which <strong>the</strong> alkali halides<br />

function as c<strong>at</strong>alysts in <strong>the</strong>se reactions is not clear aT this point. Direct reduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

salts to alkali metal by reaction with <strong>the</strong> carbon substr<strong>at</strong>e seems unlikely on <strong>the</strong>rmodynamic<br />

grounds. However, although <strong>the</strong> direct hydrolysis reaction<br />

KF + H20 = KOH + HF A CYlooK = +24 Kcal/mole<br />

has a positive free energy change <strong>at</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion temper<strong>at</strong>ures, appreciable and c<strong>at</strong>alytically<br />

active concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> KOH might be formed in a flowing gas in which <strong>the</strong> partial pressure <strong>of</strong><br />

HF is low. KF-char mixtyfgj have, in fact, been observed to evolve appreciable amounts <strong>of</strong> HF<br />

during steam gasific<strong>at</strong>ion, hence dissoci<strong>at</strong>ion and hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> KF salt evidently does<br />

occur in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> carbon and steam. In CO <strong>the</strong> mechanism <strong>of</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysis by KF cannot be<br />

2<br />

interpreted on this basis. It is interesting, however, th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkali hali alts are also<br />

moder<strong>at</strong>ely active c<strong>at</strong>alysts for <strong>the</strong> oxid<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> carbon b molecular oxygen.<br />

$95<br />

On he<strong>at</strong>ing a<br />

mixture <strong>of</strong> graphite powder and pure KF in air <strong>at</strong> 900 cy C until <strong>the</strong> carbon was completely<br />

gasified, <strong>the</strong> residue was found by analysis to contain appreciable amounts <strong>of</strong> K 0 (2.4% by<br />

weight). A similar experiment with pure NaCl produced lower (0.4%) amounts <strong>of</strong> &a 0. As no<br />

oxides could be detected in <strong>the</strong> original halide salts, <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alytically active alkali Zxides may<br />

have resulted from <strong>the</strong> oxid<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> halides during <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carbon, possibly by<br />

a reaction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type<br />

2NaCI + C + 3/2 O2 = NazO + C02 + CI2 A CYlooK = -1 I Kcal/mole<br />

though o<strong>the</strong>r halogen<strong>at</strong>ed species, such as HX, COX2, HOX and <strong>the</strong> like could be formed in low<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The c<strong>at</strong>alytic effects <strong>of</strong> alkali carbon<strong>at</strong>es and o<strong>the</strong>r salts in <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> char<br />

and graphite in steam and CO have been studied. Although <strong>the</strong> p<strong>at</strong>terns <strong>of</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alytic activity<br />

for <strong>the</strong> various additives were2similar for both char and graphite, <strong>the</strong> reactivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> char was<br />

influenced by factors such as charring temper<strong>at</strong>ure, porosity and <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> mineral<br />

impurities.<br />

On increasing <strong>the</strong> charring temper<strong>at</strong>ures from 7OO0C to 9OO0C, <strong>the</strong>re was a marked<br />

decreased in reactivity towards both steam and C02, presumably due to loss in porosity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

80


\<br />

'<br />

,<br />

1<br />

char or annealing <strong>of</strong> active sites <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> higher temper<strong>at</strong>ure. Non-porous graphite had a much<br />

lower surface area than <strong>the</strong> char and a lower reactivity, in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysts. However,<br />

within a series <strong>of</strong> char samples prepared <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> same temper<strong>at</strong>ure, <strong>the</strong>re was no significant<br />

correl<strong>at</strong>ion between reactivity and surface area. In fact, surface areas were slightly reduced<br />

when salt c<strong>at</strong>alysts were added to char samples, even though <strong>the</strong> reactivity was increased<br />

considerably. Also, <strong>the</strong> reactivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyzed samples proved not to be strongly dependent<br />

on <strong>the</strong> mode <strong>of</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyst and physical mixing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> salt with <strong>the</strong> pre-carbonized<br />

char was almost as effective as adding <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyst prior to charring.<br />

An observ<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> important practical implic<strong>at</strong>ion was <strong>the</strong> progressive and rapid initial<br />

loss in c<strong>at</strong>alytic activity during gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> constant temper<strong>at</strong>ure and on <strong>the</strong>rmal cycling<br />

between gasific<strong>at</strong>ion temper<strong>at</strong>ures and ambient. This effect, which was much more marked in<br />

steam than in CO appeared to be <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> reaction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> salt additives with mineral<br />

m<strong>at</strong>ter in <strong>the</strong> char yo form stable inert silic<strong>at</strong>es and aluminosilic<strong>at</strong>es.<br />

Thermodynamically feasible mechanisms for <strong>the</strong> alkali carbon<strong>at</strong>e c<strong>at</strong>alysts which involve<br />

sequences <strong>of</strong> oxid<strong>at</strong>ion/reduction reactions with <strong>the</strong> intermedi<strong>at</strong>e form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> alkali metal or<br />

oxides have been discussed. The moder<strong>at</strong>e c<strong>at</strong>alytic activity <strong>of</strong> certain alkali halide salts is<br />

however difficult to explain on this basis.<br />

ACKNOW LEDCEMENT<br />

Support <strong>of</strong> this work by <strong>the</strong> US Department <strong>of</strong> Energy (Contract No. DE-ACZI-8OMC<br />

14591) is gr<strong>at</strong>efully acknowledged.<br />

81


1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

9.<br />

10.<br />

11.<br />

12.<br />

13.<br />

14.<br />

15.<br />

16.<br />

17.<br />

18.<br />

19.<br />

References<br />

N. Berkowitz, "An Introduction to Coal Technology," Chapt. 2, Academic Press, NY (1979).<br />

K. Otto, L. Bartosiewicz and M. Shelef, Fuel 8, 85 (1979).<br />

A. Linares-Solano, 0. P. Mahajan and P. 1. Walker, Jr., Fuel 3, 327 (1979).<br />

K. J. Huttinger and W. Krauss, Fuel 60, 93 (1981).<br />

T. du Motay, British P<strong>at</strong>ent 2458 (1967).<br />

J. E. Gallagher, Jr., and C. A. Euker, Jr., Energy Research 2, 137 (1980).<br />

A. L. Kohl, R. B. Harty, J. G. Johanson and L. M. Naphtali, Chem. Eng. Prog., 74, 73<br />

(1978).<br />

A. E. Cover, W. C. Schreiner and C. T. Skaperdas, Chern. Eng. Prog., 69, 31 (1973).<br />

N. Kayembe and A. H. Pulsifer, Fuel 55, 211 (1976).<br />

M. 3. Veraa and A. T. Bell, Fuel 57, 194 (1978).<br />

D. W. McKee, Carbon E, 419 (1979).<br />

D. W. McKee, "Chemistry and Physics <strong>of</strong> Carbon," P. L. Walker and P. A. Thrower, Eds.,<br />

Vol. 16, p. 1, Marcel Dekker, NY 1981.<br />

C. Spiro, D. McKee, P. Kosky, E. Lamby, and D. Maylotte, to be published.<br />

D. W. McKee and D. Ch<strong>at</strong>terji, Carbon 13, 381 (1975).<br />

D. W. McKee and D. Ch<strong>at</strong>terji, Carbon 16, 53 (1978).<br />

C. Karr, P. Waldstein and J. Kovach, J. Inst. Fuel c, 177 (1974).<br />

B. J. Wood, K. M. Sancier, J. G. McCarty and H. Wise, "The Mechanism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>at</strong>alytic<br />

Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Coal Char," Technical Progress Report, SRI Intern<strong>at</strong>ional, January 1981,<br />

DOE Contract No. DE-AC21-14593.<br />

R. Lang, Exxon Research and Engineering Co., unpublished observ<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

0. W. McKee, unpublished observ<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

,<br />

82


83


n 'm<br />

L u.<br />

t<br />

m<br />

-<br />

L<br />

84


c<br />

D<br />

LL<br />

85<br />

m<br />

D<br />

Y<br />

I"""' ' """" ' f ' " ' ' ' ' ' I=<br />

N<br />

D<br />

Y<br />

z<br />

?<br />

D<br />

Y


i 5360-096bw<br />

\<br />

KINETICS OF POTASSIUM CATALYZED GASIFICATION<br />

P. Knoer and H. W. Wong. Exxon Research and Engineering Co., Baytown<br />

Research and Development Division, P. 0. Box 4255, Baytown, Texas 77520.<br />

Commercial applic<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> potassium c<strong>at</strong>alyzed <strong>coal</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

reaction (CCG) are envisioned to include high pressure (2000 to 4000 kPa) and<br />

high concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> hydrogen in <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion reactor (1, 2, 3). Published<br />

liter<strong>at</strong>ure regarding CCG, however, report studies condktFd Tt low<br />

pressure or with low concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> hydrogen or both (4, 5, 2). The<br />

present study was conducted to investig<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>i7n reaction under<br />

commercially represent<strong>at</strong>ive conditions. Thus, pressure was varied from 100 to<br />

3500 kPa and hydrogen concentr<strong>at</strong>ion was varied from 0 to 60%. O<strong>the</strong>r reaction<br />

conditions, such as temper<strong>at</strong>ure and c<strong>at</strong>alyst loading, were also varied in this<br />

1 study to check published results <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>se more represent<strong>at</strong>ive conditions.<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a from this study were combined with mechanistic inform<strong>at</strong>ion from <strong>the</strong><br />

The<br />

liter<strong>at</strong>ure (6). Only one kinetic model was found which fit both <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a and<br />

<strong>the</strong> liter<strong>at</strong>ure mechanism. The two adjustable constants for this model were<br />

regressed using over 1200 pieces <strong>of</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

and <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a is very good.<br />

The overall fit between <strong>the</strong> model<br />

Experimental Appar<strong>at</strong>us<br />

This experimental program was carried out using a one <strong>at</strong>mosphere<br />

mini-fluid bed reactor and a fixed bed reactor capable <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>at</strong> high<br />

pressure. The <strong>at</strong>mospheric pressure unit was used to study vari<strong>at</strong>ions in<br />

c<strong>at</strong>alyst loading and temper<strong>at</strong>ure. These studies were conducted using both<br />

H20 only and H20/H2 mixtures, using chars from steady st<strong>at</strong>e pilot plant<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ions and chars prepared by devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> labor<strong>at</strong>ory.<br />

A schem<strong>at</strong>ic diagram <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mini-fluid bed reactor unit is shown in<br />

Figure 1. The reactor portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unit consists <strong>of</strong> a 0.6 cm I.D. quartz<br />

U-tube inside a hot steel block. W<strong>at</strong>er is fed to <strong>the</strong> U-tube using a small<br />

syringe pump and is vaporized in <strong>the</strong> reactor. Argon or hydrogen gas is also<br />

fed to <strong>the</strong> unit. Ceramic beads are placed in <strong>the</strong> inlet leg <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U-tube to<br />

enhance <strong>the</strong> vaporiz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er and to help disperse <strong>the</strong> gas flow.<br />

The exit<br />

gases from <strong>the</strong> reactor flow into an oxidizer where all carbon species are<br />

converted to carbon dioxide. After condensing any unreacted steam, <strong>the</strong> gas<br />

stream is bubbled through a sodium hydroxide solution where <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong><br />

total carbon converted is autom<strong>at</strong>ically monitored by measuring <strong>the</strong> conduc-<br />

tivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solution.<br />

The argon or hydrogen gas fed to <strong>the</strong> mini-fluid bed serves to fluidize<br />

<strong>the</strong> char particles. The gas r<strong>at</strong>e is typically about 40 cc/min STP<br />

which is equivalent to about 7 cm/sec linear superficial velocity in <strong>the</strong><br />

reactor <strong>at</strong> 700°C. The minimum fluidizing velocity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> char particles is<br />

3-4 cm/sec. Char sample sizes varied from 0.25 grams to 1.00 gram in <strong>the</strong><br />

minifluid bed. The w<strong>at</strong>er feed r<strong>at</strong>e ranged from 0.2 to 2.5 ml/hour.<br />

a7


5360-096bw<br />

The fixed bed reactor was used primarily to study pressure effects.<br />

runs in <strong>the</strong> fixed bed were made <strong>at</strong> 700°C using labor<strong>at</strong>ory prepared char.<br />

All<br />

Vari<strong>at</strong>ions were made in feed gas composition and flow r<strong>at</strong>e. A simplified flow<br />

diagram <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fixed bed unit is shown in Figure 2. The unit consists <strong>of</strong> a<br />

high pressure w<strong>at</strong>er pump, steam gener<strong>at</strong>or, fixed bed reactor, condenser for<br />

unreacted steam, gas chrom<strong>at</strong>ographs, and dry gas flow measurement system. I<br />

The reactor itself is a one-inch Schedule 80 type 316 stainless steel<br />

pipe. The pipe holds a char sample inside a split tube furnace.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Varying Potassium-to-Carbon R<strong>at</strong>io<br />

If <strong>the</strong> overall carbon conversion is altered in <strong>the</strong> CCG reactor, <strong>the</strong><br />

r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> potassium-to-carbon (K/C) in <strong>the</strong> reactor w i l l change as well.<br />

Therefore, <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyst loading on kinetics must be known in<br />

order to be able to optimize initial c<strong>at</strong>alyst loading as well as overall<br />

carbon conversion for <strong>the</strong> CCG process. Experiments were conducted in <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>at</strong>mospheric mini-fluid bed reactor to determine <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> carbon conversion<br />

and c<strong>at</strong>alyst loading on <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

Plotting <strong>the</strong> initial gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es against <strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er soluble K/C<br />

r<strong>at</strong>io reveals an approxim<strong>at</strong>ely linear rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between <strong>the</strong> two as shown in<br />

Figures 3 and 4. This is consistent with <strong>the</strong> earlier findings by o<strong>the</strong>rs (a).<br />

This suggests th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion is proportional to <strong>the</strong> con-<br />

centr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a (C-K) species ra<strong>the</strong>r than carbon or potassium concentr<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

per se. At high carbon concentr<strong>at</strong>ions and low K/C r<strong>at</strong>ios, <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> (C-K) species is proportional to <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> (K) since <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

an overabundance <strong>of</strong> (C). The gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e thus appears to be independent<br />

<strong>of</strong> carbon Concentr<strong>at</strong>ion (;.e., zero order kinetics), At low carbon concentra-<br />

tions and high K/C r<strong>at</strong>ios, <strong>the</strong>re is an overabundance <strong>of</strong> (K). The gasific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e w i l l <strong>the</strong>n appear to be first order with respect to carbon. From studies<br />

<strong>of</strong> pilot plant chars, <strong>the</strong> demarc<strong>at</strong>ion between high and low K/C r<strong>at</strong>ios appears<br />

to be about 0.2 mole C/mole w<strong>at</strong>er soluble potassium.<br />

Vari<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> React ion Temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

The dependence <strong>of</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e on temper<strong>at</strong>ure was studied in <strong>the</strong><br />

mini-gasifier, both with and without H2 in <strong>the</strong> feed gas.<br />

Figure 5 shows <strong>the</strong> measured reaction r<strong>at</strong>es as a function <strong>of</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

for experiments both with and without H2 in <strong>the</strong> reactor. The apparent temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

dependence changes as <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas fed to <strong>the</strong> reactor<br />

changes. From Figure 4 it is seen th<strong>at</strong> for H20 + H2 in <strong>the</strong> feed gas,<br />

gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e is very sensitive to temper<strong>at</strong>ure changes. Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e approxim<strong>at</strong>ely halves for each 25°C drop in reactor temper<strong>at</strong>ure below<br />

700'C.<br />

88


t<br />

5360-096pj<br />

There is an interaction between feed gas composition and apparent<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure dependence because <strong>the</strong> mini-reactor is an integral reactor. For<br />

example, when pure steam is introduced <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed <strong>of</strong> char,<br />

a mixture <strong>of</strong> H20 + Hp issues from <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed. As <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> reaction<br />

changes, <strong>the</strong> gas composition <strong>at</strong> various loc<strong>at</strong>ions in <strong>the</strong> reactor changes even<br />

though <strong>the</strong> feed gas remains <strong>the</strong> same. Therefore, as temper<strong>at</strong>ure changes,<br />

some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> change in r<strong>at</strong>e is due to activ<strong>at</strong>ion energy, but some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> change<br />

is due to gas composition. A reactor model which performs an integr<strong>at</strong>ion over<br />

<strong>the</strong> bed is required to account for both effects.<br />

Our modeling work discussed<br />

in <strong>the</strong> next section <strong>of</strong> this report has identified <strong>the</strong> true activ<strong>at</strong>ion energy<br />

as about 50 kcal/g mole.<br />

Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion R<strong>at</strong>e Expression<br />

During an earlier phase <strong>of</strong> research on <strong>the</strong> CCG process, a screening<br />

<strong>of</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion reaction r<strong>at</strong>e models was reported by Vadovic and Eakman<br />

(5). In this screening, all combin<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> from one to four inhibition terms<br />

involving <strong>the</strong> partial <strong>pressures</strong> <strong>of</strong> H2, CO, H20, and <strong>the</strong> cross products <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> partial <strong>pressures</strong> <strong>of</strong> H2and CO, and Hp and H 0 were tested in <strong>the</strong> denomin<strong>at</strong>or<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e expression. In ali, <strong>the</strong>y tested thirty models.<br />

Those models which gave neg<strong>at</strong>ive coefficients on regression were discarded as<br />

being physically unreal. Four additional models were discarded because <strong>the</strong>y<br />

gave an infinite r<strong>at</strong>e for a pure stem environment.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> thirty models<br />

These<br />

tested, three models remained which gave good fit to <strong>the</strong>ir d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

three are listed below.<br />

For <strong>the</strong>ir screening <strong>of</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e models, Vadovic and Eakman used<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a from runs in which only pure steam was fed to <strong>the</strong> bed <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> char.<br />

Mixtures <strong>of</strong> HpO and H2 or H20, H2, and CO were introduced and studied in <strong>the</strong><br />

present program.<br />

89


5360-096bw<br />

In addition to <strong>the</strong> empirical d<strong>at</strong>a, mechanistic consider<strong>at</strong>ions were used<br />

to discrimin<strong>at</strong>e among <strong>the</strong> three models for c<strong>at</strong>alytic gasific<strong>at</strong>ion kinetics.<br />

Several mechanisms have been proposed for <strong>the</strong> steam-carbon reaction in <strong>the</strong><br />

past (7). Recent work by Mims and Pabst (6) indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall<br />

gasifiF<strong>at</strong>ion kinetics are consistent with a simple surface oxide mechanism:<br />

oxygen exchange<br />

; ,k2 co + surface oxide decomposition<br />

With <strong>the</strong> larger d<strong>at</strong>a base and <strong>the</strong> proposed mechanism, it was possible<br />

to better distinguish among <strong>the</strong> three r<strong>at</strong>e models identified earlier. Only<br />

Model A was found to be consistent with both <strong>the</strong> mechanism studies and <strong>the</strong> new<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a. This model is shown in general form below:<br />

rG = <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion in moles per hour per ft3 <strong>of</strong> reactor<br />

KG = <strong>the</strong> equilibrium constant for steam and 6-graphite<br />

Pi = <strong>the</strong> partial pressure <strong>of</strong> component i i n <strong>the</strong> reactor<br />

k = <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e constant; it contains <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyst loading and tempera-<br />

ture dependence.<br />

Parameter Estim<strong>at</strong>ion for <strong>the</strong> Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion Reaction<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 28 successful fixed bed runs were made <strong>at</strong> <strong>pressures</strong> ranging<br />

from 100 to 3500 kPa, Hp flows ranging from 0 to 1.0 moles per hour, CO<br />

flows ranging from 0 to 0.17 moles per hour and steam flows ranging from 0.3<br />

to 1.3 moles per hour. It was observed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> total gas make and gas<br />

composition changed during <strong>the</strong> runs as carbon was depleted from <strong>the</strong> bed. It<br />

was also observed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> methane and carbon dioxide were nearly in chemical<br />

equilibrium with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r gas phase components for <strong>the</strong> conditions studied.<br />

A combin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> kinetic constants k and b in Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 1 were sought<br />

which would make <strong>the</strong> predictions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fixed bed model best fit <strong>the</strong> fixed<br />

90


1<br />

I<br />

><br />

\<br />

i<br />

I<br />

5360-096bw<br />

bed d<strong>at</strong>a. Best fit is defined by a small devi<strong>at</strong>ion between predicted and<br />

observed molar flow r<strong>at</strong>es.<br />

would be as follows:<br />

Thus, one expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> objective function<br />

where,<br />

s = <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> squares <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> devi<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

-<br />

Nijk = a predicted molar flow r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

Nijk = an observed molar flow r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

i = a particular gas component (Hp, CO, C02, CH4, or H20)<br />

j = a particular level <strong>of</strong> carbon in <strong>the</strong> fixed bed reactor<br />

k = a particular fixed bed reactor run<br />

Hunter (8) has shown th<strong>at</strong> use <strong>of</strong> this objective function w i l l yield <strong>the</strong><br />

maximum likelihood estim<strong>at</strong>es for k and b only if <strong>the</strong> following three criteria<br />

are met:<br />

(1) The measurement errors on each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> five gas species are normally<br />

distributed and <strong>the</strong>se errors are independent.<br />

(2) The variances on <strong>the</strong> measurement errors <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> five gas<br />

species are identical.<br />

(3) There is no correl<strong>at</strong>ion between <strong>the</strong> measurement errors for any two<br />

gas species.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiment we know th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> measurements on <strong>the</strong><br />

four fixed gases were rel<strong>at</strong>ed in th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y were all sampled simultaneously<br />

by <strong>the</strong> gas chrom<strong>at</strong>ograph and <strong>the</strong> composition was normalized. Therefore, an<br />

error in <strong>the</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong> any one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four fixed gases would be distributed<br />

among <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three fixed gases as well. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, any error in <strong>the</strong><br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> CO or C02 would result in an error in <strong>the</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong> H20<br />

as well since H20 yield was calcul<strong>at</strong>ed by oxygen balance.<br />

<strong>the</strong>se consider<strong>at</strong>ions, equ<strong>at</strong>ion 2 was not used as <strong>the</strong> objective function for<br />

this study.<br />

Box and Draper (9) have derived <strong>the</strong> following objective function for use<br />

in cases where unquantified covariance exists in <strong>the</strong> experimental measurements:<br />

mi n i mi ze A = det I Snm I<br />

where,<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong><br />

A = <strong>the</strong> determinant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 5 x 5 m<strong>at</strong>rix composed <strong>of</strong> elements Snm<br />

91


5360-096bw<br />

where, I<br />

n,m = particular gas components<br />

j,k = as above.<br />

Hunter (8) recommends <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> this objective function when covariance<br />

might exist in <strong>the</strong> experimental measurements.<br />

Rosenbrock’s hill climbing method (10) was used to search for <strong>the</strong> optimum<br />

values <strong>of</strong> k and b in equ<strong>at</strong>ion 1. For ea3 set <strong>of</strong> k and b, <strong>the</strong> fixed bed<br />

reactor model equ<strong>at</strong>ions were numerically integr<strong>at</strong>ed 28 times; i.e., once for<br />

each fixed bed reactor run being estim<strong>at</strong>ed. For each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 28 fixed bed<br />

reactor runs, comparisons between calcul<strong>at</strong>ed and observed molar flow r<strong>at</strong>es<br />

were made for 8 to 10 different levels <strong>of</strong> carbon in bed. With five different<br />

gas species being estim<strong>at</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong>re were over 1200 comparisons made for each<br />

guess <strong>of</strong> a k,b pair. For each guess, <strong>the</strong> appropri<strong>at</strong>e cross products <strong>of</strong><br />

devi<strong>at</strong>ions were calcul<strong>at</strong>ed and accumul<strong>at</strong>ed to form <strong>the</strong> 5 X 5 m<strong>at</strong>rix <strong>of</strong> elements<br />

Snm. The determinant <strong>of</strong> this m<strong>at</strong>rix was calcul<strong>at</strong>ed and used by <strong>the</strong><br />

Rosenbrock routine to make a new guess <strong>at</strong> k and b.<br />

-__ Results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Regression<br />

The initial guesses for k and b were taken from <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> Vadovic<br />

and Eakman (5). For 700°C and <strong>the</strong> K/C r<strong>at</strong>io used <strong>the</strong>se were as follows:<br />

k = 0.0204<br />

b = 0.1775<br />

The routine returned <strong>the</strong> following values:<br />

k = 0.0173<br />

b = 0.2080<br />

Figures 6 through 10 are parity plots <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> predicted and observed values<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> molar flow r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> H2, CO, Cop, CH4, and H20. The parity plots<br />

show th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> fixed bed reactor model does a good job <strong>of</strong> predicting all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

gas species from <strong>the</strong> fixed bed reactor runs over a wide variety <strong>of</strong> conditions<br />

with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> CH4. A slight overprediction <strong>of</strong> CH4 yield is observed.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The potassium c<strong>at</strong>alyzed gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Illinois No. 6 bituminous <strong>coal</strong><br />

was found to fit a Langmuir-Hinshelwood type kinetic model. This model<br />

provides a good fit to fixed bed and mini<strong>at</strong>ure fluid bed d<strong>at</strong>a over <strong>pressures</strong><br />

92<br />

J


I<br />

1.<br />

I<br />

5360-096bw<br />

ranging from <strong>at</strong>mojpheric to 3500 kPa and over broad ranges <strong>of</strong> gas composition.<br />

The model closely predicted <strong>the</strong> observed flow r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> each specie in <strong>the</strong><br />

product gas over a range <strong>of</strong> an crder <strong>of</strong> magnitude or more. This model is<br />

consistent with <strong>the</strong> surface oxide mechanism for <strong>the</strong> steam-carbon reaction<br />

which was proposed in earlier liter<strong>at</strong>ure. A sophistic<strong>at</strong>ed st<strong>at</strong>istical regres-<br />

sion technique was used to choose <strong>the</strong> two adjustable constants for this model<br />

by comparison with over 1200 pieces <strong>of</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

The kinetic constants were regressed from d<strong>at</strong>a taken over <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong><br />

practical commercial interest. This kinetic model may be combined with<br />

independently verified correl<strong>at</strong>ions for bubble growth and mass transfer in a<br />

fluidized bed and used directly to study larger pilot plant d<strong>at</strong>a or scale-up<br />

issues.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

This work was supported by <strong>the</strong> United St<strong>at</strong>es Department <strong>of</strong> Energy under<br />

Contract No. ET-78-C-01-2777 and by <strong>the</strong> Gas Research Institute.<br />

93


5360-096mm<br />

Rk F E K E Ir C E S<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

9.<br />

10.<br />

N. C. Nahas and J. E. Gallaqher, Jr., "C<strong>at</strong>alytic Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Predevelopment kesearch," Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>- Thirteenth Intersoc<br />

Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, (August 1978).<br />

B. T. Fant and C. A. Euker, Jr., "Exxon's C<strong>at</strong>alytic Coal Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Process," Presented to The First Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Research Conference,<br />

(June 9-12, 1980).<br />

D. Hebden and H. J. F. Stroud, "Coal Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion Processes," in Chemistry<br />

<strong>of</strong> Coal Utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion Second Supplementary Volume, M. A. Elliot ed.,<br />

(1Y81), pp. 1649-1650.<br />

H. ti. Hipkin, Carbon-Steam System <strong>at</strong> Low Temper<strong>at</strong>ures and Under Pressure,<br />

PhD Thesis, IvI.1.T. (1951).<br />

C. J. Vadovic and J. 1.1. Eakman, "Kinetics <strong>of</strong> Potassium C<strong>at</strong>alyzed Gasifica-<br />

tion," presented <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American Chemical Society<br />

(September, 1978).<br />

C. A. Iviims and J. K. Pabst, "Alkali C<strong>at</strong>alyzed Carbon tiasific<strong>at</strong>ion 11.<br />

Kinetics and Iviechanism," presented <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American<br />

Chemical Society (August, 1980).<br />

P. L. Walker, Jr., F. Rusinko, Jr., ana L. ti. Austin, Advances in C<strong>at</strong>alysis<br />

- XI, (1959).<br />

k. ti. Hunter, "Estim<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Unknown Constants From Multi-response D<strong>at</strong>a,"<br />

I & k C Fundamentals, Vol. 6, (1967), pp. 461-463.<br />

G.E.P. Box and N. K. Draper, Biometrika, V52, (1965), p. 355.<br />

h. H. Rosenbrock, "An Autom<strong>at</strong>ic Method for Findiny <strong>the</strong> Gre<strong>at</strong>est or Least<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> a Function," Computer J., 3 (1960).<br />

94<br />

c


uY.ku<br />

ICHlMAlIC OF MINI-FLUID BE0 RUCTOR UNll<br />

FIGURE 3<br />

GASIFICATION RATE INCREASES LINEARLY WITH IKICI RATIO<br />

0 H20 Only<br />

X H~OtH211:II<br />

.05<br />

iNlTlAL IKIC) H20 SOLUBLE. lMOLElhlOLEl<br />

800-9-204<br />

95<br />

c<br />

-<br />

EFFECT OF CATALYST LOADING ON GASIFICATION<br />

810-3-37<br />

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6<br />

INITIAL IKI H20 SOLUBLE


fj&u.Ku<br />

APPARENT ACTIVATION ENERGY DEPENDS ON<br />

FEED CAS COhlPOSlTlON<br />

-<br />

0, Temper<strong>at</strong>ure. O F<br />

Ea - 31 Kcallmole<br />

1100<br />

818-3-38<br />

w<br />

a 0.10 : 0 Steam Feed<br />

0 - . 0 Steam + Hydrajen<br />

c -<br />

j 0.05<br />

G 0.P5 1.0 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20<br />

-<br />

LA 4<br />

(l/T) x Id, I K 1-l<br />

808-12-1131<br />

-<br />

FIGURE 7<br />

CALCULATED AND OBSERVED FLOW RATES OF CARBON MONOXIDE<br />

5<br />

0 Y<br />

u,<br />

"<br />

-<br />

CALCULATED AND OBSERVED FLOW RATES OF HYDROGEN<br />

OBSERVED FLOW RATES lmDllhDUrl<br />

8DB-12-1130<br />

808-12-1132<br />

CALCULATED AND OBSERVED FLOW RATES OF CARBON DIOXIDE<br />

OBSERVED FLOW RATE :MOilHal OBSERVED FLOW RATE IMOLIHRI<br />

96


800-12-1133<br />

-9 FIGURE IO<br />

CALCULATED AN0 OBSERVED FLOW RATES FOR METHANE CALCULATED AN0 OBSZRVED FLOW RATES FOR STEAM<br />

OBSERVE0 FLOW RATE IMOLIHRJ<br />

-<br />

CL<br />

I<br />

0'<br />

1.0<br />

Y<br />

5 0.4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

0<br />

2<br />

Y<br />

s<br />

0.1<br />

0.1 0.4<br />

97<br />

OBSERVED FLOW RATE IMOLIHR)<br />

000-12-1134<br />

1.0


EVOLUTION ,V:D REMOVAL OF POLLUTANTS FROM THE GASIFICATION<br />

OF A SUBBITUMINOUS COAL IN A FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR<br />

R.M.Felder, J.K.Ferrel1, R.W.Rousseau, M.J.Purdy. and R.N.Kellg<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering<br />

North Carolina St<strong>at</strong>e University<br />

Raleigh, North Carolina 27650<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

As a part <strong>of</strong> a continuing research program on <strong>the</strong> environmental<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> fuel conversion, <strong>the</strong> U. S. Environmental Protection Agency<br />

has sponsored a research project on <strong>coal</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> North Carolina<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e University in <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering. The facility<br />

used for this research is a small <strong>coal</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion-gas cleaning pilot<br />

plant. The overall objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project is to characterize <strong>the</strong><br />

gaseous and condensed phase emissions from <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion-gas cleaning<br />

process, and to determine how emission r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> various pollutants depend<br />

on adjustable process parameters.<br />

A complete description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facility and oper<strong>at</strong>ing procedures is<br />

given by Ferrell et al., Vol I, (19801, and in abbrevi<strong>at</strong>ed form by Felder<br />

et al. (1980). A schem<strong>at</strong>ic diagram <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gasifier, <strong>the</strong> Acid Cas<br />

Removal System (AGRS), and o<strong>the</strong>r major components is shown in Figure 1.<br />

In an initial series <strong>of</strong> runs on <strong>the</strong> gasifier, a pretre<strong>at</strong>ed Western<br />

Kentucky No. 11 <strong>coal</strong> was gasified with steam and oxygen. The results <strong>of</strong><br />

this work are given by Ferrell et al., Vol 11, (19811, and were presented<br />

<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> EPA Symposium on Enviromental Aspects <strong>of</strong> Fuel Conversion<br />

Technology V, held in St. Louis, Mo., September, 1980.<br />

The second major study carried out on <strong>the</strong> facility vas <strong>the</strong><br />

steam-oxygen gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a New Mexico subbituminous <strong>coal</strong> (from <strong>the</strong><br />

Navaho mine <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Utah Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Co.) using refriger<strong>at</strong>ed methanol as<br />

<strong>the</strong> AGRS solvent. This paper presents a brief summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gasifier<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ion using this <strong>coal</strong>, shows examples <strong>of</strong> analyses <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

gasifier effluent streams, and presents a summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AGRS using <strong>the</strong> gasifier make gas as feed.<br />

SUMMARY OF GASIFIER OPERATION<br />

The fluidized bed gasifier and raw gas cleaning system (cyclone,<br />

venturi scrubber, filters and he<strong>at</strong> exchanger) used for <strong>the</strong>se studies was<br />

originally desigr.ed for <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a devol<strong>at</strong>ilized <strong>coal</strong> char<br />

with a very low vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter content. Extensive modific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gasifier, <strong>the</strong> venturi scrubber system, and <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong><br />

exchanger was required’ for oper<strong>at</strong>ion with <strong>the</strong> high vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter New<br />

98


Mexico <strong>coal</strong>. Table 1 shows an analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> char and <strong>coal</strong> used in<br />

studies to d<strong>at</strong>e. After modific<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>the</strong> system functioned well in<br />

providing a clean, dry gas to <strong>the</strong> acid gas removal system.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental work so far has been carried out with <strong>the</strong><br />

solid <strong>coal</strong> particles fed into <strong>the</strong> reactor several feet above <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> fluidized bed. The particles are thus in contact with <strong>the</strong> hot<br />

product gases for several seconds before mixing into <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed, a<br />

mode <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> tends to maximize <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> tars and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

organic liquids from <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>. It is an excellent mode <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion for<br />

our present purpose since it produces rel<strong>at</strong>ively high concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong><br />

environmentally important elements and compounds.<br />

Proxim<strong>at</strong>e Analysis<br />

Fixed Carbon 86.0<br />

Vol<strong>at</strong>ile M<strong>at</strong>ter 2.4<br />

Koisture 0.9<br />

Ash 10.7<br />

42.0<br />

35.4<br />

10.5<br />

22.6<br />

Ultim<strong>at</strong>e Analysis<br />

Carbon 83.8 52.5<br />

Hydrogen 0.6 4.8<br />

Oxygen 2.2 18.3<br />

Nitrogen 0.1 1.2<br />

Sulfur 2.6 0.6<br />

Ash 10.7 22.6<br />

-----.----_____---______________________---------------------------<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 15 gasifier runs were made covering a range <strong>of</strong> reactor<br />

parameters. For this series <strong>of</strong> runs) <strong>the</strong> average temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

fluidized bed was varied from about 1600°F to 1800°F, and <strong>the</strong> molar steam<br />

to carbon r<strong>at</strong>io was varied from about 1.0 to 2.0. The <strong>coal</strong> feed r<strong>at</strong>e and<br />

<strong>the</strong> reactor pressure were kept nearly constant. Several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first<br />

reactor runs were made with mixtures <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and char, but all integr<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

runs reported on l<strong>at</strong>er were made with 100% <strong>coal</strong>. At <strong>the</strong> lower<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> methane and <strong>of</strong> tars and o<strong>the</strong>r hydrocarbons<br />

is maximized. As <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure is increased, <strong>the</strong> make gas r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

increases, <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> methane and o<strong>the</strong>r hydrocarbons decreases,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> C02 increases.<br />

GASIFIER MODELING RESULTS<br />

'Io aid in <strong>the</strong> formul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> gasifier performance correl<strong>at</strong>ions, a<br />

simple model has been developed which considers <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion process<br />

to occur in three stages: instantaneous devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> cos1 in a<br />

zonc above <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed, instantaneous combustion <strong>of</strong> carbon <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

99


ottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed, and steam-carbon gasific<strong>at</strong>ion and w<strong>at</strong>er gas shift<br />

reaction in a single perfectly mixed iso<strong>the</strong>rmal stage. The model is<br />

significant in and <strong>of</strong> itself, but it6 particular importance to <strong>the</strong><br />

project is th<strong>at</strong> it enables <strong>the</strong> specific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> gasifier conditions<br />

required to produce a feed to <strong>the</strong> acid gas removal system with a<br />

predetermined flow r<strong>at</strong>e and composition.<br />

In a previous report (Ferrell et al., 19811, <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

model was presented, and <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model to correl<strong>at</strong>e d<strong>at</strong>a on<br />

<strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a devol<strong>at</strong>ilized bituminous <strong>coal</strong> was demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />

The model was subsequently extended to include <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile<br />

gases in <strong>the</strong> pyrolysis stage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion process, and used to fit<br />

<strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a from <strong>the</strong> present series <strong>of</strong> runs with <strong>the</strong> New Mexico<br />

subbituminous <strong>coal</strong>. The model takes as input <strong>the</strong> average reactor bed<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure and pressure, <strong>the</strong> bed dimensions, feed r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>, steam,<br />

oxygen, and nitrogen, solids holdup in <strong>the</strong> bed, and ultim<strong>at</strong>e analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> feed <strong>coal</strong>, and calcul<strong>at</strong>es carbon conversion and make gas flow r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

and composition. A complete description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model in its present form<br />

will be given in an EPA report now in prepar<strong>at</strong>ion. A lot <strong>of</strong> model<br />

predictions vs measured values <strong>of</strong> carbon conversion is shown in Figure 2.<br />

The reasonably close proximity <strong>of</strong> most points to <strong>the</strong> 45 degree line on<br />

this and similar plots for total make gas flow r<strong>at</strong>e and individual<br />

species (CO, H2, COP) emissions is gr<strong>at</strong>ifying io view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> simplicity<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model.<br />

AGRS OPERATION AND RESULTS<br />

Top feeding <strong>coal</strong> into <strong>the</strong> gasifier allows a substantial amount <strong>of</strong><br />

devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion to take place before <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> enters <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed.<br />

While most commercial fluidized bed gasifiers will use a deep-bed<br />

injection method <strong>of</strong> feeding <strong>coal</strong> into <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed, it was decided<br />

not to modify our system in order to maximize <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> tars,<br />

oils, and o<strong>the</strong>r hydrocarbons and to provide a more complete test <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

AGRS.<br />

It should also be noted th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ively simple acid gas removal<br />

system used in this study lacks <strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> selective systems<br />

found in many physical absorption processes. These systems, which use<br />

more than one absorber and stripper, and <strong>of</strong>ten several flash tanks,<br />

separ<strong>at</strong>e sulfur gases from carbon dioxide before fur<strong>the</strong>r processing <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> acid gas. This is done to concentr<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> sulfur gases before <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are fed to a sulfur recovery unit, and to recover <strong>the</strong> Cog or vent <strong>the</strong><br />

C02-rich stream to <strong>the</strong> <strong>at</strong>mosphere. While <strong>the</strong> AGRS used in this study<br />

could have been modified to emul<strong>at</strong>e an existing selective absorption<br />

process, it was decided th<strong>at</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a obtained from a rel<strong>at</strong>ively simple but<br />

well-characterized system would be <strong>of</strong> more use than d<strong>at</strong>a obtained from a<br />

fairly complex system, similar but not identical, to existing commercial<br />

systems. Through judicious use <strong>of</strong> computer simul<strong>at</strong>ion and engineering<br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ions, <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a obtained from our system should be extrapol<strong>at</strong>able<br />

to more industrially significant situ<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

100


',<br />

Complete results from all runs carried out will be -published in a<br />

forthcoming EPA report. Illustr<strong>at</strong>ive results from a single run will be<br />

Presented here. Gas analyses from <strong>the</strong> six different loc<strong>at</strong>ions shown in<br />

Figure 1 are given in Table 2. The paragraphs th<strong>at</strong> follow Summarize <strong>the</strong><br />

Principal conclusions derived from analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> run d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

B<br />

Ci3<br />

'2'4<br />

C2H6<br />

H S<br />

c8s<br />

N<br />

co c44<br />

Benzene<br />

Toluene<br />

Ethyl Benz.<br />

Xylenes *<br />

Thiopiene<br />

Pro pang<br />

Butane **<br />

Methanol<br />

Acid Gas Removal<br />

31.60<br />

23.51<br />

0.52<br />

0.72<br />

0.250<br />

0.0078<br />

19.36<br />

6.56<br />

17.29<br />

0.087<br />

0.031<br />

0.0016<br />

0.0080<br />

44<br />

16<br />

TRACE<br />

TRACE<br />

1505<br />

208<br />

185<br />

-----<br />

31 .ll<br />

23.91<br />

0.53<br />

0.72<br />

0.284<br />

0.0076<br />

19.61<br />

6.46<br />

17.47<br />

0.097<br />

0.034<br />

0.0017<br />

0.0094<br />

44<br />

29<br />

-----<br />

3<br />

1521<br />

198<br />

150<br />

-----<br />

31.29<br />

21.98<br />

0.56<br />

0.76<br />

0.287<br />

0.0076<br />

19.93<br />

6.51<br />

17.92<br />

0.234<br />

0.534<br />

0.0450<br />

0.1557<br />

127<br />

28<br />

8<br />

TRACE<br />

1811<br />

253<br />

143<br />

-..---<br />

42.38<br />

-___<br />

0.0242<br />

0.0164<br />

0.0048<br />

0.0001<br />

26.79<br />

7.54<br />

23.35<br />

TRACE<br />

0.0054<br />

----<br />

--___<br />

TRACE<br />

-----<br />

I___<br />

TRACE<br />

107<br />

301<br />

54<br />

-----<br />

15.58<br />

25.99<br />

1.28<br />

1.92<br />

0.090<br />

0.0041<br />

19.27<br />

14.20<br />

21.55<br />

0.0031<br />

0.0033<br />

_-_--<br />

----<br />

-I--<br />

5<br />

-----<br />

TRACE<br />

995<br />

172<br />

91<br />

-----<br />

0.00<br />

64.74<br />

1.54<br />

2.13<br />

0.66<br />

0.027<br />

23.06<br />

2.36<br />

1 .80<br />

0.15<br />

0.030<br />

-----<br />

--___<br />

-----<br />

TRACE<br />

-----<br />

TRACE<br />

4640<br />

2203<br />

71<br />

3.68<br />

The primary function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AGRS is to remove COP and sulfur<br />

compounds from <strong>the</strong> gases produced during <strong>coal</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion. When using<br />

refriger<strong>at</strong>ed methanol, <strong>the</strong> absorber also acts as an excellent trap for<br />

any o<strong>the</strong>r compound which condenses or disolves in <strong>the</strong> methanol <strong>at</strong><br />

absorber conditions.<br />

The run d<strong>at</strong>a show th<strong>at</strong> for <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> conditions studied, <strong>the</strong> most<br />

significant factor in high acid gas removal efficiencies is stripping<br />

efficiency. With <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> more extreme oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions and<br />

"cleaner" methanol fed to <strong>the</strong> absorber, <strong>the</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> C02, COS and H2S in<br />

<strong>the</strong> sweet gas can be reduced to acceptable levels. This is a<br />

particularly important point in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> COS removal which poses<br />

101


problems for many <strong>coal</strong> gas cleaning systems. The d<strong>at</strong>a show th<strong>at</strong><br />

refriger<strong>at</strong>ed methanol is effective in removing COS and no unusual<br />

solubility characteristics were evident <strong>at</strong> moder<strong>at</strong>e <strong>pressures</strong> and low<br />

liquid temper<strong>at</strong>ures.<br />

Trace Sulfur Compounds<br />

There are several sulfur compounds besides H2S and COS present in<br />

<strong>the</strong> gas fed to <strong>the</strong> AGRS which must be removed. Table 2 shows <strong>the</strong><br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se compounds in <strong>the</strong> AGRS. While <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

some sc<strong>at</strong>ter in <strong>the</strong> analyses for methyl mercaptan, thiophene, CS2, and<br />

ethyl mercaptan/dimethyl sulfide, it appears th<strong>at</strong> in most runs <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

removed to very low levels in <strong>the</strong> absorber.<br />

A point <strong>of</strong> potential enviromnental significance is th<strong>at</strong> while <strong>the</strong>se<br />

compounds are removed to low levels, <strong>the</strong>y are not completely accounted<br />

for in <strong>the</strong> flash and acid gas streams. This can be seen for methyl<br />

mercaptan and thiophene, which are present in rel<strong>at</strong>ively high levels in<br />

<strong>the</strong> feed gas. These compounds will accumul<strong>at</strong>e in <strong>the</strong> recircul<strong>at</strong>ory<br />

solvent and most likely eventually leave <strong>the</strong> system in one <strong>of</strong> three exit<br />

streams: sweet gas, flash gas, or acid gas. Because most sulfur<br />

recovery systems cannot tre<strong>at</strong> mercaptans and thiophene, <strong>the</strong>y will present<br />

emission problems if some additional method <strong>of</strong> tre<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong>se gases is<br />

not used. This can be a significant problem because <strong>the</strong> total sulfur<br />

from mercaptans, organic sulfides, CS2! and thiophene is approxim<strong>at</strong>ely<br />

half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total sulfur associ<strong>at</strong>ed with COS. If <strong>the</strong>se compounds appear<br />

with <strong>the</strong> sweet gas, <strong>the</strong>y are likely to affect adversely downstream<br />

methan<strong>at</strong>ion c<strong>at</strong>alysts. The presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se compounds io <strong>the</strong> sweet gas<br />

stream is also a problem if <strong>the</strong> gas is to be burned for immedi<strong>at</strong>e use<br />

because <strong>the</strong> sulfur in <strong>the</strong>se compounds will be converted to SO2.<br />

In examining <strong>the</strong> results from all runs, <strong>the</strong>re appears to be some<br />

p<strong>at</strong>tern <strong>of</strong> trace sulfur species distribution. An increase in stripper<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure from -5.6'F to 48'F resulted in substantially gre<strong>at</strong>er amounts<br />

<strong>of</strong> mercaptan and thiophene in <strong>the</strong> acid<br />

distribute to all exit streams in most<br />

differences in process conditions.<br />

gas stream. CS seems to<br />

2<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> runs despite <strong>the</strong><br />

Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most significant finding here is th<strong>at</strong> over a wide range<br />

<strong>of</strong> processing conditions, <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>at</strong> least small amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

several different sulfur species is to be expected in all AGRS exit<br />

streams, and provision must be made for handling <strong>the</strong> associ<strong>at</strong>ed problems.<br />

Aliph<strong>at</strong>ic Hydrocarbons<br />

As <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter present in a particular <strong>coal</strong><br />

increases, <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> aliph<strong>at</strong>ic, arom<strong>at</strong>ic, and polynuclear<br />

arom<strong>at</strong>ic compounds produced during gasificztion also increases. Over <strong>the</strong><br />

range <strong>of</strong> conditions studied here, <strong>the</strong> most significant point to be made<br />

about <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> aliph<strong>at</strong>ic hydrocarbons is <strong>the</strong>ir presence in<br />

significant quantities in <strong>the</strong> flash and acid gases. Although flashing <strong>of</strong><br />

102


I<br />

<strong>the</strong> methanol down to <strong>at</strong>mospheric pressure prior to stripping would<br />

release most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hydrocarbons, <strong>the</strong> COp-rich flash gas would still<br />

contain substantial amounts <strong>of</strong> several hydrocarbon species. This stream<br />

would require fur<strong>the</strong>r processing before it could be vented.<br />

In a run in which <strong>the</strong> gasifier was oper<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> a lower temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

to increase <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> hydrocarbons, <strong>the</strong> aliph<strong>at</strong>ic6 (excluding<br />

methane) made up almost 4.5% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> acid gas stream and 3.5% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flash<br />

gas stream. While staging <strong>the</strong> flashing oper<strong>at</strong>ions may result in a better<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se compounds, <strong>the</strong> total product from <strong>the</strong> flashing and<br />

stripping oper<strong>at</strong>ions must be ei<strong>the</strong>r recovered as product, fed to a sulfur<br />

recovery unit, or vented to <strong>the</strong> <strong>at</strong>mosphere. Since it is unlikely th<strong>at</strong><br />

all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aliph<strong>at</strong>ic hydrocarbons will appear in <strong>the</strong> sweet gas stream, as<br />

evidenced by <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a collected here, additional tre<strong>at</strong>ment will be<br />

necessary to prevent <strong>the</strong>ir eventual appearance in a vent stream.<br />

There appears to be no unusual p<strong>at</strong>tern <strong>of</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> aliph<strong>at</strong>ic<br />

hydrocarbons in <strong>the</strong> AGRS. The lighter hydrocarbons-- methane, ethylene,<br />

and ethane-- seem to distribute as vould be indic<strong>at</strong>ed from an examin<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir pure-component solubilities in methanol. The magnitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

solubilities, however, are gre<strong>at</strong>er than would be expected from Henry's<br />

law, especially <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> high <strong>pressures</strong> used in <strong>the</strong> absorber. This is<br />

evident from <strong>the</strong> lower than predicted levels <strong>of</strong> ethane and ethylene in<br />

<strong>the</strong> sweet gas in several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> runs.<br />

Arom<strong>at</strong>ic Hvdrocarbons<br />

Because large amounts <strong>of</strong> arom<strong>at</strong>ic hydrocarbons are produced during<br />

<strong>coal</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>the</strong> potential for environmental problems is gre<strong>at</strong>.<br />

These compounds, which range from benzene to polynuclear species <strong>of</strong> many<br />

forms, must be prevented from escaping from <strong>the</strong> gas cleaning process and<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir distribution throughout <strong>the</strong> gas cleaning system is <strong>of</strong> gre<strong>at</strong><br />

concern.<br />

The simpler arom<strong>at</strong>ics, benzene, toluene, and xylene, typically make<br />

up 0.1% (by volume) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas stream entering <strong>the</strong> AGRS. (See Table 2.)<br />

Analyses performed for selected runs indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> significant quantities<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se compounds are found in <strong>the</strong> solvent leaving <strong>the</strong> stripper.<br />

Eventually <strong>the</strong>se compounds would build up in <strong>the</strong> solvent to <strong>the</strong> point <strong>of</strong><br />

s<strong>at</strong>ur<strong>at</strong>ion. If <strong>the</strong> solvent is not effectively purged <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se compounds<br />

periodically, <strong>the</strong>y would begin to appear in several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process<br />

streams.<br />

Methanol Analysis<br />

In order to identify <strong>the</strong> various hydrocarbon species th<strong>at</strong> accumul<strong>at</strong>e<br />

in <strong>the</strong> methanol, samples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> methanol leaving <strong>the</strong> stripper were taken<br />

for several runs. These samples were <strong>the</strong>n analyzed by gas<br />

chrom<strong>at</strong>ographylmass spectrometry. The compounds detected are shown in<br />

Table 3. The presence <strong>of</strong> several siloxanes and phthal<strong>at</strong>es was probably<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ed to some contamin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample during processing.<br />

103


Results from <strong>the</strong>se runs indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> compounds<br />

accumul<strong>at</strong>ing in <strong>the</strong> methanol are simple arom<strong>at</strong>ics, primarily substituted<br />

benzenes. A few C and Cll isomers were identified. indic<strong>at</strong>ing th<strong>at</strong><br />

napthalene is prigably present but <strong>at</strong> trace levels. The presence <strong>of</strong><br />

trace amounts <strong>of</strong> C 14 and C15 isomers were found in but <strong>the</strong>y could not be<br />

better identified. These may be polynuclear arom<strong>at</strong>ics but <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

present in very small amounts rel<strong>at</strong>ive to <strong>the</strong> simpler arom<strong>at</strong>ics.<br />

Samples <strong>of</strong> liquid condensing in <strong>the</strong> knockout tank downstream from<br />

<strong>the</strong> sour gas compressor were collected and analyzed by GC/HS. This<br />

condens<strong>at</strong>e contains most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> heavier hydrocarbons fed to <strong>the</strong> AGRS.<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se analyses are presented in Table 4, and show th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

compounds identified are very similar to those found in <strong>the</strong> stripped<br />

methanol. Again, mostly simple arom<strong>at</strong>ics were found. No polynuclear<br />

arom<strong>at</strong>ics were present, vhich supports <strong>the</strong> findings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earlier<br />

analyses.<br />

Results from <strong>the</strong>se analyses indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> very little, if any,<br />

polynuclear arom<strong>at</strong>ic compounds were present in <strong>the</strong> gas fed to <strong>the</strong> AGRS.<br />

This is a particularly important finding. Analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er used to<br />

quench <strong>the</strong> gasifier product gas stream showed th<strong>at</strong> s substantial amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> polynuclear arom<strong>at</strong>ics were present. Evidently, scrubbing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> raw<br />

product gas with w<strong>at</strong>er effectively removes <strong>the</strong>se compounds.<br />

Although polynuclear arom<strong>at</strong>ics are removed by <strong>the</strong> quenching process,<br />

substantial amounts <strong>of</strong> simpler arom<strong>at</strong>ics will be present in <strong>the</strong> sour gas<br />

fed to <strong>the</strong> AGRS. The use <strong>of</strong> cold traps may remove some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

compounds but provision must be made to prevent <strong>the</strong>ir release to <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>at</strong>mosphere through vent streams or through <strong>the</strong> sulfur recovery unit. The<br />

accumul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se compounds in <strong>the</strong> methanol fur<strong>the</strong>r complic<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong><br />

problem because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increased likelihood <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir distribution to a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> process streams. Achieving efficient solvent regener<strong>at</strong>ion is,<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore, a key step in avoiding enviromnental problems.<br />

SUnMARY<br />

A cyclone, a cold w<strong>at</strong>er quench scrubber, and a refriger<strong>at</strong>ed methanol<br />

absorber have been used to clean <strong>the</strong> make gas from <strong>the</strong> steam-oxygen<br />

gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a New Mexico subbituminous <strong>coal</strong> in a pilot-scale<br />

fluidized bed ractor. A model developed for <strong>the</strong> gasifier provides <strong>the</strong><br />

capability <strong>of</strong> predicting <strong>the</strong> make gas amount and composition as a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> gasifier oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions. The methanol functioned<br />

effectively for acid gas removal. Removal <strong>of</strong> COq, COS, and H2S ,to<br />

sufficiently low levels was achieved with proper choice <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

conditions and effective solvent regener<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

104


TABLE 3<br />

-----___________________________________------------------<br />

COMPOUNDS IDENTIFIED IN STRIPPER EXIT lIETHANOL<br />

-----_________________________---------------------------------<br />

1. s<strong>at</strong>'d hydrocarbon 21. toluene 42. C3 alkyl benzene<br />

2. cop 22. methyl thiophene 43. C3 alkyl benzene<br />

isomer 44. C10H22 isomer<br />

3. C H isomer<br />

4 8<br />

4. tetramethylsilane<br />

5. trichlor<strong>of</strong>luro-<br />

23.<br />

24.<br />

25.<br />

C8H16 isomer<br />

C8H16 isomer<br />

C8H16 isomer<br />

45.<br />

46.<br />

47.<br />

CloHlk' isomer<br />

C4 a yl benzene<br />

ClOHz2 isomer<br />

methane<br />

6. C5~lo isomer 26. C8H isomer<br />

tirace)<br />

48.<br />

49.<br />

C E<br />

U%I%<br />

isomer<br />

hydrocarbon<br />

7. unknown 27. C8H14 isomer 50. CgHlo<br />

(trace)<br />

8. Freon 113<br />

9. cyclopentadiene<br />

10. C6H12 isomer<br />

11. C6H14 jsomer<br />

12. C6H10 isomer<br />

13. benzene<br />

28.<br />

29.<br />

30.<br />

31.<br />

32.<br />

33.<br />

hexamethyl<br />

cyclotrisiloxane<br />

CgHZ0 isomer<br />

C H isomer<br />

e?,:? benzene<br />

xylene (M.P)<br />

styrene<br />

51.<br />

52.<br />

53.<br />

54.<br />

55.<br />

56.<br />

C H isomer<br />

9 8<br />

alkyl benzene isomer<br />

C H isomer<br />

C'B 28 isomer<br />

c8 Bo isomer<br />

c;B~;~o isomer<br />

14.<br />

15.<br />

16.<br />

17.<br />

C7H14 isomer<br />

C7Hl6 isomer<br />

C7H16 isomer<br />

C7H12 isomer<br />

34.<br />

35.<br />

36.<br />

37.<br />

xylene (0)<br />

C9H18 isomer<br />

C H isomer<br />

C: zfkyl<br />

benzene<br />

57.<br />

58.<br />

59.<br />

60.<br />

unknown siloxane<br />

unknown siloxane<br />

unknown siloxane<br />

C14H30 isomer<br />

18. C7H12 isomer 38.<br />

clOSiZmer<br />

61. C14E30 isomer<br />

19. C7H12 isomer 39. unknown<br />

hydrocarbon<br />

62. unknown<br />

20. unknown 40. unknown 63. C15H32 isomer<br />

hydrocarbon hydrocarbon<br />

41. Cl1HZ4 isomer<br />

..................................................................<br />

....................................................................<br />

COMPOUNDS IDENTIFIED IN COMPRESSOR KNOCKOUT SAMPLE<br />

....................................................................<br />

1. 1-penteoe 10. substituted benzene<br />

2. hydrocarbon 11. C8 hydrocarbon<br />

3. benzene 12. Cg hydrocarbon<br />

4. hydrocarbon 13. propyl or ethyl methyl substituted benzene<br />

5. Toluene 14. propyl or ethyl methyl substituted benzene<br />

6. cyclo C4-C5 15. 1-decene<br />

7. hydrocarbon 16. 2-propyl benzene<br />

8. ethyl benzene 17. 1-ethyl-4methy1 benzene<br />

9. dimethyl benzene<br />

......................................................................<br />

105<br />

TABLE 4


The presence <strong>of</strong> several trace sulfur compounds--ercaptans,<br />

thiophenes, organic sulfides, and CS2--comp1ic<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong> gas cleaning<br />

process because <strong>the</strong>se compounds were found to distribute among all exit<br />

streams from <strong>the</strong> AGRS. Since no provision is made to specifically tre<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se forms <strong>of</strong> sulfur, <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir emission into <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>at</strong>mosphere exists and must be dealt with to avoid significant<br />

environmental problems.<br />

A wide variety <strong>of</strong> aliph<strong>at</strong>ic and arom<strong>at</strong>ic hydrocarbons are present in<br />

<strong>the</strong> gas stream fed to <strong>the</strong> AGRS. The aliph<strong>at</strong>ic hydrocarbons. ranging from<br />

methane to butane, cover a wide range <strong>of</strong> solubilities. Their presence in<br />

all AGRS streams must be anticip<strong>at</strong>ed to prevent <strong>the</strong>ir emission to <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>at</strong>mosphere.<br />

While a wide range <strong>of</strong> simple arom<strong>at</strong>ics were identified in <strong>the</strong> gas<br />

stream fed to <strong>the</strong> AGRS, essentially no polynuclear arom<strong>at</strong>ic compounds<br />

were found. Apparently, <strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er quenching process effectively removes<br />

<strong>the</strong>se compounds from <strong>the</strong> gasifier product gas. Bowever. significant<br />

quantities <strong>of</strong> simple arom<strong>at</strong>ics were found to accumul<strong>at</strong>e in <strong>the</strong><br />

recircul<strong>at</strong>ing methanol, indic<strong>at</strong>ing a potential for <strong>the</strong>ir eventual<br />

discharge to <strong>the</strong> <strong>at</strong>mosphere. Provision must be made to periodically<br />

purge <strong>the</strong> solvent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se compounds and/or remove <strong>the</strong>m prior to <strong>the</strong> AGRS<br />

through cold traps.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Ferrell, J. K., R. M. Felder, R. W. Rousseau, J. C. McCue, R.<br />

M. Kelly, and W. E. Willis, "Coal Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion/Gas Cleanup Test<br />

Facility: Vol I. Description and Oper<strong>at</strong>ion", EPA-600/7-80-046a,<br />

(1980).<br />

2. Felder, R. M., R. M. Kelly, J. K. Ferrell, and R. W. Rousseau.<br />

"How Clean Gas is Made from Coal", Env. Science and Tech., Vol 14;<br />

658, (1980).<br />

3. Ferreil, J. K., , R. M. Felder, R. W. Rousseau, S. Ganesan, R.<br />

M. Kelly, J. C. McCue. and M. J. Purdy, "Coal Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion/Gas<br />

Cleanup Test Facility: Vol 11. Environmental Assesment <strong>of</strong> Oper<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

with Devol<strong>at</strong>ilized Bituminous Coal and Chilled Methanol", EPA, (1981).<br />

106<br />

I<br />

I'


\<br />

"I<br />

N<br />

z<br />

107<br />

c. . 0<br />

0


100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

c 70<br />

0<br />

.r<br />

+<br />

u<br />

.r<br />

-0<br />

W<br />

7<br />

-0 W<br />

0<br />

x<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

20<br />

_ _ _ _ ~ ~<br />

~~<br />

'Z Carbon Conversion<br />

Flguro 2<br />

Predicted vs. Experimental Carbon Conversion,<br />

Gasific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> New Mexico Coal<br />

OElement mass balance<br />

worse than 8%<br />

@All Element mass balances<br />

within E%<br />

@All element mass balances<br />

within 6%<br />

1 I I I I 1 I<br />

30 41! 50 0 0 70 80 90 1 OC<br />

Ex pe rinien til 1<br />

108


I. INTRODUCTION<br />

DIRECT METHANATION - A NEW METHOD OF CONVERTING<br />

SYNTHESIS GAS TO SUBSTITUTE NATURAL GAS<br />

Howard S. Meyer, Vernon L. Hill, Ab Flowers<br />

Gas Research Institute<br />

8600 West Bryn M~WK Avenue<br />

Chicago, Illinois 60631<br />

John Happel, Miguel A. Hn<strong>at</strong>ow<br />

C<strong>at</strong>alysis Research Corpor<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

450 E. Edsall Boulevard<br />

' Palisades Park, NJ 07650<br />

The United St<strong>at</strong>es has vast resources <strong>of</strong> energy in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>. One<br />

method <strong>of</strong> distributing this energy source to <strong>the</strong> consumer is to gasify <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>coal</strong> and distribute <strong>the</strong> gas through <strong>the</strong> existing n<strong>at</strong>ural gas pipeline<br />

distribution system. However, raw syn<strong>the</strong>sis gas from a <strong>coal</strong> gasifier is not<br />

<strong>of</strong> sufficient purity and does not provide he<strong>at</strong>ing value suitable for use<br />

directly as substitute n<strong>at</strong>ural gas (SNG). The syn<strong>the</strong>sis gas produced by a<br />

<strong>coal</strong> gasifier requires extensive purific<strong>at</strong>ion and upgrading before it can be<br />

interchanged with n<strong>at</strong>ural gas. The current raw gas conversion systems were<br />

not specifically designed with <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> pipeline quality gas from<br />

<strong>coal</strong> in mind. Potentially, significant cost reductions could result from <strong>the</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> an improved, integr<strong>at</strong>ed processing system.<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> str<strong>at</strong>egic objective <strong>of</strong> improving reliability, operability, or<br />

reducing gas costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> gasific<strong>at</strong>ion processes, <strong>the</strong> Gas Research Institute<br />

(GRI) is developing a new process for converting syn<strong>the</strong>sis gas to SNG. The<br />

key to this process is <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> a sulfur-resistant, direct<br />

methan<strong>at</strong>ion c<strong>at</strong>alyst. Preliminary cost estim<strong>at</strong>es show th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> direct<br />

methan<strong>at</strong>ion process could decrease capital costs by over 20% and oper<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

costs by lo%, resulting in gas costs savings <strong>of</strong> about 15% over<br />

st<strong>at</strong>e-<strong>of</strong>-<strong>the</strong>-art methan<strong>at</strong>ion and combined shift-methan<strong>at</strong>ion processes.<br />

11. METHANATION PROCESSES<br />

A conventional gas processing system, as shown in Figure lA, includes gas<br />

quench, w<strong>at</strong>er-gas shift, gas cooling,acid gas removal, methan<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

dehydr<strong>at</strong>ion, and compression. These clean-up processes produce separ<strong>at</strong>e<br />

streams th<strong>at</strong> require fur<strong>the</strong>r purific<strong>at</strong>ion so th<strong>at</strong> by-products, such as Sulfur,<br />

phenols, ammonia, BTX, and tars, can be isol<strong>at</strong>ed for sale whenever possible.<br />

The g?s quench utilizes oil and/or w<strong>at</strong>er to cool <strong>the</strong> raw gas and to remove<br />

particul<strong>at</strong>es, tars, and oils, and o<strong>the</strong>r condensible components.<br />

-<br />

W<strong>at</strong>er-gas shift (Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 1) is required to adjust <strong>the</strong> H2/CO r<strong>at</strong>io to over 3<br />

CO + H20 -<br />

H2 + CO2 1)<br />

as needed for methan<strong>at</strong>ion. Added steam reacts with <strong>the</strong> carbon monoxide to<br />

produce <strong>the</strong> required hydrogen. The use <strong>of</strong> new sulfur-insensitive shift<br />

c<strong>at</strong>alysts show an economic advantage by allowing <strong>the</strong> shift process to be<br />

upstream <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas cooling and acid gas removal systems. The acid gas<br />

removal system removes w<strong>at</strong>er, carbon dioxide, and sulfur-containing<br />

compounds. The current methan<strong>at</strong>ion process uses nickel-based c<strong>at</strong>alysts for<br />

109


converting (methan<strong>at</strong>ing) carbon monoxide and hydrogen to methane (Equ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

I<br />

2). After methan<strong>at</strong>ion, dehydr<strong>at</strong>ion is required to remove <strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er formed<br />

during methan<strong>at</strong>ion; after which <strong>the</strong> gas is compressed to pipeline standards. I1<br />

Nickel c<strong>at</strong>alysts have demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>ir effectiveness for converting<br />

syn<strong>the</strong>sis gas to methane. However, <strong>the</strong>re are very strict process restrictions<br />

for successful use <strong>of</strong> nickel c<strong>at</strong>alysts. S<strong>at</strong>isfying <strong>the</strong>se restrictions can<br />

require process steps th<strong>at</strong> are costly. A major restriction <strong>of</strong> nickel I<br />

c<strong>at</strong>alysts arises from <strong>the</strong>ir extreme sensitivity to poisoning by sulfur<br />

compounds th<strong>at</strong> are always present in <strong>coal</strong>-derived syn<strong>the</strong>sis gas. Although<br />

/<br />

"sweet" pipeline gas can contain 4 ppm hydrogen sulfide (0.25 grains/100 scf),<br />

gas processed by nickel c<strong>at</strong>alysts must be purified to 0.1 ppm sulfur to avoid<br />

irreversible poisoning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyst. The nickel c<strong>at</strong>alyst can also be<br />

irreversibly poisoned by carbon fouling, unless <strong>the</strong> hydrogen/carbon monoxide<br />

r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> input gas is maintained above 2.85 and/or excess steam is added.<br />

Nickel c<strong>at</strong>alysts are also deactiv<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ures (above 950°F),<br />

such as those th<strong>at</strong> can occur during <strong>the</strong> exo<strong>the</strong>rmic methantion reaction.<br />

Nickel c<strong>at</strong>alysts cannot be exposed to oxygen after activ<strong>at</strong>ion. They require<br />

special handling and pretre<strong>at</strong>ment procedures to maintain reactivity.<br />

Improvements to <strong>the</strong> conventional methan<strong>at</strong>ion process are those embodying<br />

combined shift-methan<strong>at</strong>ion, such as those developed by Conoco, R. M. Parsons,<br />

United C<strong>at</strong>alyst, ICI, and UOP. These processes utilize <strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er formed in<br />

methan<strong>at</strong>ion for w<strong>at</strong>er-gas shift. (Equ<strong>at</strong>ions 1 and 2 simultaneously.) A<br />

combined shif t-methan<strong>at</strong>ion process is shown in Figure 1B. Since nickel-based<br />

c<strong>at</strong>alysts are used, removal <strong>of</strong> sulfur is required prior to shift-methan<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

All <strong>the</strong> combined shift-methan<strong>at</strong>ion processes require steam addition for<br />

stoichiometry, temper<strong>at</strong>ure moder<strong>at</strong>ion, and/or to prevent carbon form<strong>at</strong>ion. An<br />

additional acid gas removal system is required downstream <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

shift-methan<strong>at</strong>ion process to remove <strong>the</strong> high concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> CO2.<br />

The direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion process being developed for GRI shows significant<br />

improvements over <strong>the</strong> conventional methan<strong>at</strong>ion and combined shift-methan<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

processes. The direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion process, shown in Figure lC, methan<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong><br />

raw gas directly using equal molar concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide and<br />

hydrogen to form carbon dioxide and w<strong>at</strong>er. The chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process is<br />

such th<strong>at</strong> steam is not needed ei<strong>the</strong>r to suppress carbon form<strong>at</strong>ion or to drive<br />

<strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er-gas shift reaction. Although <strong>the</strong> overall reaction for combined<br />

shift-methan<strong>at</strong>ion is <strong>the</strong> same as for direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion (Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 3), <strong>the</strong> mech-<br />

2CO 4- 2H2 = CH4 + CO2 3)<br />

anism appears different in th<strong>at</strong> Cog is produced directly ra<strong>the</strong>r than by <strong>the</strong><br />

w<strong>at</strong>er-gas shift, thus elimin<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> high steam requirement. The process<br />

shows potential savings in steam usage and acid gas removal. O<strong>the</strong>r process<br />

advantages are expanded upon in <strong>the</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paper.<br />

111 .DIRECT METHANATION CATALYST DEVELOPMENT<br />

C<strong>at</strong>alysis Research Corpor<strong>at</strong>ion (CRC), loc<strong>at</strong>ed in Palisades Park, New Jersey,<br />

is responsible for iter<strong>at</strong>ively developing novel c<strong>at</strong>alyst formul<strong>at</strong>ions,<br />

performing scoping tests to evalu<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> formul<strong>at</strong>ions,<br />

and proposing process sequences th<strong>at</strong> best utilize <strong>the</strong> advantages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most<br />

promising c<strong>at</strong>alysts. During <strong>the</strong> last six years, CRC has tested over 600 new<br />

c<strong>at</strong>alyst formul<strong>at</strong>ions resulting in several compositions th<strong>at</strong> have promise for<br />

applic<strong>at</strong>ion both in a conventional methan<strong>at</strong>ion process and in a new direct<br />

methan<strong>at</strong>ion process.<br />

110<br />

I<br />

I<br />

P


The c<strong>at</strong>alyst development program for a sulfur-resistant methan<strong>at</strong>ion c<strong>at</strong>alyst,<br />

from 1974-1978, lead to two p<strong>at</strong>ented c<strong>at</strong>alyst formul<strong>at</strong>ions. In 1977, P<strong>at</strong>ent<br />

4,151,191 was issued to CRC for a cerium-molybdenum c<strong>at</strong>alyst, design<strong>at</strong>ed as<br />

GRI Series 200 (GRI-C-284). In 1981, P<strong>at</strong>ent 4,260,553 was issued to CRC for a<br />

cerium-molybdenum-aluminium c<strong>at</strong>alyst, design<strong>at</strong>ed as GRI Series 300<br />

(GRI-C-318). Both p<strong>at</strong>ents were assigned to GRI. These c<strong>at</strong>alysts s<strong>at</strong>isfied<br />

<strong>the</strong> original project objective <strong>of</strong> developing a sulfur-resistant methan<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

c<strong>at</strong>alyst; however, <strong>the</strong>y also lead to a new area <strong>of</strong> study.<br />

In 1979, a second breakthrough was made in <strong>the</strong> CRC c<strong>at</strong>alyst formul<strong>at</strong>ion work.<br />

A new family <strong>of</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysts, <strong>the</strong> GRI Series 400 and 500 c<strong>at</strong>alysts, were<br />

developed th<strong>at</strong> promote <strong>the</strong> direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion reaction (Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 3) ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than <strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er-gas shift reaction (Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 1). These c<strong>at</strong>alysts provide <strong>the</strong><br />

key to <strong>the</strong> new direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion process. The overall project objective was<br />

changed to reflect this breakthrough, and subsequential work concentr<strong>at</strong>ed on<br />

developing a direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion process.<br />

The present series <strong>of</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysts are <strong>the</strong> most active c<strong>at</strong>alysts yet developed.<br />

These c<strong>at</strong>alysts show sufficiently high conversion and selectivity such th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>y can be used in a direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion process th<strong>at</strong> involves no gas<br />

recycling and uses only a single acid gas removal system. They can oper<strong>at</strong>e<br />

with feed gases containing high levels <strong>of</strong> sulfur compounds and Cog. Carbon<br />

form<strong>at</strong>ion has not been observed, even with Hz/CO r<strong>at</strong>ios as low as 0.1 and<br />

with no steam addition, and <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysts have high maximum oper<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ures. The c<strong>at</strong>alyst are very easy to handle; <strong>the</strong>y can be exposed to<br />

air <strong>at</strong> room temper<strong>at</strong>ure with no loss <strong>of</strong> activity, and <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong>y require<br />

little or no pretre<strong>at</strong>ment.<br />

IV. DIRECT METHANATION CATALYST CHARACTERIZATION<br />

SRI Intern<strong>at</strong>ional, loc<strong>at</strong>ed in Menlo Park, California, is responsible for<br />

characterizing <strong>the</strong> promising c<strong>at</strong>alysts developed by CRC. The studies are<br />

intended to define <strong>the</strong> bulk and surface <strong>properties</strong> th<strong>at</strong> affect <strong>the</strong> specific<br />

methan<strong>at</strong>ion activity, <strong>the</strong>rmal stability, and deactiv<strong>at</strong>ion resistance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

c<strong>at</strong>alysts as an aid in fur<strong>the</strong>r development and improvement. SRI has been<br />

involved with <strong>the</strong> Direct Methan<strong>at</strong>ion Project since 1977, but also has<br />

developed c<strong>at</strong>alysts under contracts to <strong>the</strong> American Gas Associ<strong>at</strong>ion (A.G.A.)<br />

since 1972.<br />

The direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion process requires a c<strong>at</strong>alyst th<strong>at</strong> selectively promotes<br />

<strong>the</strong> direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion reaction (Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 3). C<strong>at</strong>alyst selectivity and<br />

activity can be strongly dependent upon both <strong>the</strong> comp.osition and morphology <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyst. Development <strong>of</strong> basic methods to rel<strong>at</strong>e microcompositional and<br />

morphological <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyst to selectivity and activity is<br />

vitally important in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> improved c<strong>at</strong>alysts and gas processes<br />

for <strong>coal</strong> conversion plants. Work being performed by SRI is intended to refine<br />

measurement techniques suitable for understanding <strong>the</strong> observed behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion c<strong>at</strong>alysts.<br />

In order to evalu<strong>at</strong>e c<strong>at</strong>alyst structure, SRI had to develop or improve new<br />

experimental techniques utilizing (1) x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS or<br />

ESCA), (2) scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and (3) BET surface area<br />

measurements to provide inform<strong>at</strong>ion on structural changes <strong>of</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysts.<br />

Dispersion and sintering stability studies have been performed using x-ray<br />

diffraction (XRD), SEM, and ESCA to define changes in <strong>the</strong> <strong>properties</strong> th<strong>at</strong><br />

control methan<strong>at</strong>ion activity. Solid st<strong>at</strong>e <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysts have<br />

been determined by a variety <strong>of</strong> surface science techniques.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> its n<strong>at</strong>ure, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work performed by SRI is proprietary; a<br />

general discussion <strong>of</strong> some aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work follows. First, tests were<br />

111


performed to study structural changes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyst during methan<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

This resulted in <strong>the</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> a critical formul<strong>at</strong>ion variable th<strong>at</strong><br />

controls <strong>the</strong> specific methan<strong>at</strong>ion activity. L<strong>at</strong>er, discovery <strong>of</strong> a correl<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

between methan<strong>at</strong>ion activity and surface acidity, as measured by quantit<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

absorption <strong>of</strong> a weak base (ammonia), simplified c<strong>at</strong>alyst evalu<strong>at</strong>ion. Finally,<br />

a preliminary explan<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mechanism by which <strong>the</strong> GRI Series 400 and 500<br />

c<strong>at</strong>alysts oper<strong>at</strong>e was developed.<br />

V. DIRECT CATALYST METHANATION EVALUATION<br />

The Institute <strong>of</strong> Gas Technology (IGT), loc<strong>at</strong>ed in Chicago, Illinois, is<br />

responsible for evalu<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> promising c<strong>at</strong>alyst formul<strong>at</strong>ions prepared by CRC<br />

using feed gases th<strong>at</strong> simul<strong>at</strong>e gasifier effuents and developing <strong>the</strong> process<br />

design d<strong>at</strong>a for promising c<strong>at</strong>alysts in various processing sequences. The<br />

studies are intended to test <strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysts for longer times and <strong>at</strong> more severe<br />

and realistic conditions than <strong>the</strong> scoping tests performed by CRC. IGT has<br />

been involved with <strong>the</strong> Direct Methan<strong>at</strong>ion Project since 1978, but also has<br />

evalu<strong>at</strong>ed c<strong>at</strong>alyst under contracts to A.G.A. since 1972.<br />

The GRI Series 500 c<strong>at</strong>alysts are <strong>the</strong> best methan<strong>at</strong>ion c<strong>at</strong>alysts tested to<br />

d<strong>at</strong>e. They are capable <strong>of</strong> promoting <strong>the</strong> methan<strong>at</strong>ion reaction <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures<br />

from 600° to 1200°F, <strong>at</strong> all <strong>pressures</strong> from 200 to 1000 psig, <strong>at</strong> feed gas<br />

H2/CO mole r<strong>at</strong>ios from 3 down to 0.5, and in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> up to 3 mole %<br />

sulfur (H2S, COS, CS2, CH3SH, C2H5SH, C3H7SH, and CqHqS).<br />

No carbon form<strong>at</strong>ion was detected under any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above mentioned conditions.<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> C02 in <strong>the</strong> feed retarded <strong>the</strong> total CO conversion but did not<br />

promote any o<strong>the</strong>r reactions. Hydrocarbon additions <strong>of</strong> up to 2 mole %<br />

C6H6, 0.05 mole % C6H50H, and 0.3 mole % NH3 did not poison or foul<br />

<strong>the</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alysts. Life tests were conducted on <strong>the</strong> GRI Series 200 c<strong>at</strong>alysts for<br />

more than 5000 hours, and ongoing life tests <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> GRI Series 500 c<strong>at</strong>alysts<br />

have extended for more than 2500 hours.<br />

The promising c<strong>at</strong>alysts were also tested in various processing sequences to<br />

provide process design d<strong>at</strong>a. IGT tested <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> space velocity,<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure, pressure, and feed composition on <strong>the</strong> conversion <strong>of</strong> CO and Hg<br />

to CH4 and CO2 by <strong>the</strong> direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion process. The feed gas simul<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

a gasifier effluent. The product composition <strong>of</strong> each reactor was used as <strong>the</strong><br />

feed composition for each successive reactor stage, and runs <strong>at</strong> identical<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure and pressure were conducted. This approach gener<strong>at</strong>ed inform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

on <strong>the</strong> process variables <strong>at</strong> each reactor stage, provided input for process<br />

design, and served as a guideline for c<strong>at</strong>alyst improvement.<br />

wench gases simul<strong>at</strong>ing those from <strong>the</strong> dry-bottom Lurgi, Slagging Lurgi,<br />

Westinghouse and HYGAS processes were tested. For cases where <strong>the</strong> H2/CO<br />

r<strong>at</strong>io is less than 1, as in <strong>the</strong> Slagging Lurgi case <strong>at</strong> H2/CO = 0.4, a<br />

preconditioning shift was required to increase <strong>the</strong> H2/CO r<strong>at</strong>io to 1.1 to<br />

1.3. The process steam requirements are <strong>the</strong>refore much lower than required<br />

for shifting <strong>the</strong> gas to 3 as needed for nickel methan<strong>at</strong>ion c<strong>at</strong>alysts. The<br />

shift was performed with a CRC developed, GRI Series 300 c<strong>at</strong>alyst and required<br />

only 16% steam in <strong>the</strong> feed gas to <strong>the</strong> methan<strong>at</strong>ion step, as shown in Figure 2.<br />

Typical d<strong>at</strong>a for a Slagging Lurgi flowsheet are shown in Figure 3 for <strong>the</strong><br />

first reactor stage.<br />

VI. DIRECT PROCESS METHANATION EVALUATION<br />

C F Braun & Company, loc<strong>at</strong>ed in Alhambra, California, is <strong>the</strong> engineering/<br />

construction firm responsible for developing conceptual processes from <strong>the</strong><br />

design d<strong>at</strong>a collected by IGT and from <strong>the</strong> process sequences recommended by<br />

CRC. First-cut economic evalu<strong>at</strong>ions are <strong>the</strong>n performed based on <strong>the</strong><br />

conceptual process design. The conceptual process design work includes<br />

112


Preparing process flow diagrams and sizing equipment. Capital cost and<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ing requirements estim<strong>at</strong>es are used in <strong>the</strong> economic evalu<strong>at</strong>ion to<br />

determine gas costs.<br />

A preliminary economic evalu<strong>at</strong>ion was conducted in 1979, based on <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a<br />

GRI Series 300 c<strong>at</strong>alyst. The results indic<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> concept would not be<br />

competitive because <strong>the</strong> design required CO2 removal prior to methan<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

However, Cog removal is not required with <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> GRI Series 400 and<br />

500 c<strong>at</strong>alysts, because <strong>the</strong>se c<strong>at</strong>alysts have good activity in streams with a<br />

high Cog content.<br />

A first-cut analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion process for a Slagging Lurgi<br />

gasifier raw gas was just completed. The analysis compared a 250 billion<br />

Btu/day Slagging Lurgi gasific<strong>at</strong>ion plant with a combined shift-methan<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

process to a plant designed around <strong>the</strong> direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion process. The design<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gasifier was not changed, but <strong>the</strong> overall downstream process, utilizing<br />

commercially available subsystems, was redesigned to best exploit <strong>the</strong> direct<br />

methan<strong>at</strong>ion process advantages. A simplified flowsheet, based on a GRI Series<br />

500 c<strong>at</strong>alyst, is shown in Figure 4.<br />

The preliminary results show <strong>the</strong> direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion process could reduce<br />

capital costs over 202, oper<strong>at</strong>ing cost by lo%, and reduce <strong>the</strong> gas cost by<br />

about 15%. The savings are realized in reduced steam requirements and more<br />

efficient sulfur management processes specifically for this applic<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r savings were anticip<strong>at</strong>ed when new subsystems are developed<br />

specifically for use with direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

V I1 . C ONCLUS IONS<br />

The current GRI project to develop a direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion process is making<br />

excellent technical progress. Direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion processes utilizing <strong>the</strong> CRC<br />

c<strong>at</strong>alysts could potentially realize <strong>the</strong> following advantages over existing<br />

techno logy :<br />

Reduced plant investment, oper<strong>at</strong>ing costs, and gas costs<br />

Effective hydrogen utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

One acid gas removal step<br />

Smaller acid gas removal feed stream<br />

Higher energy efficiency<br />

Sulfur tolerance<br />

Carbon fouling tolerance<br />

Lower process steam requirements<br />

Decreased he<strong>at</strong> exchange area<br />

If <strong>the</strong> development continues to be successful, <strong>the</strong> direct methan<strong>at</strong>ion process<br />

will be pursued through <strong>the</strong> pilot plant scale to provide <strong>the</strong> technology base<br />

required for commercial applic<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMEhT<br />

The authors wish to acknowledge <strong>the</strong> contributions made by Dr. Henry Wise <strong>at</strong> SRI<br />

Intern<strong>at</strong>ional, Mr. Anthony L. Lee <strong>at</strong> IGT, Dr. Roger Detman <strong>at</strong> C F Braun & Co. and<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir staffs for <strong>the</strong>ir contributions to <strong>the</strong> overall progress <strong>of</strong> this project.<br />

113


A - CONVENTIONAL GAS PROCESSING SYSTEM<br />

Gasilier - Quench - 2;:;<br />

Dehydr<strong>at</strong>ion Pipeline<br />

Melhanalion- 8 - Oualily<br />

Compression SNG<br />

B - COMBINED SHlFTlMETHANATlON GAS PROCESSING SYSTEM<br />

Acid Gas Combined CO,<br />

Gasifier - - Removal Me~~~~lion- Removal<br />

Dehydr<strong>at</strong>ion Pipeline<br />

Ouality<br />

Me!han<strong>at</strong>ion Comp~ession - SNG<br />

C - DIRECT METHANATION GAS PROCESSING SYSTEM<br />

Gasilier<br />

FIGLTRE 1. ?.EEIANATION PR02ESSSS<br />

2.5<br />

L 3 2.0 -<br />

a<br />

0<br />

lK<br />

a 1.5 -<br />

- z<br />

CO<br />

co2<br />

56.5<br />

3.4<br />

0<br />

F 1.0 -<br />

a<br />

c<br />

O 0.5 -<br />

Y (v<br />

I<br />

Olb<br />

I<br />

20<br />

HZ 29.0<br />

CHq 9.5<br />

C2Hg 0.05<br />

C3H8 0.01<br />

HzS I .O<br />

0.45<br />

N2 -<br />

TOTAL 100.00<br />

I<br />

30 4<br />

H?O - IN FEED, mol '1'<br />

A80102698<br />

FIGUR? 2. PECONDITIONING SLAGGING LURGI<br />

RAW GASES (1000 psig, 580°F, 4500 SCF/hr-ft3<br />

GFX-C-318 C<strong>at</strong>alyst)<br />

114


\<br />

\<br />

i<br />

1.<br />

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000<br />

SPACE VELOCITY, SCF/hr-ft3<br />

A8101 01 4 3<br />

PIGURI;: 3. CO Z(~cINvEXs103 I:I T'B XRST DIECT .?IETHAK4TION STAGE FOR<br />

SLAGGIYG LURGI RAN GASES (450 psig, GRI-C-525 C<strong>at</strong>alyst)<br />

Stream<br />

Component<br />

0<br />

Gas Analysis, Vol %<br />

(H20 and N2 Free Basis)<br />

0 0<br />

co 58.9 37.6 1.7<br />

0<br />

c 0 2 6.5 19.1 56.1 0.7<br />

H2 25.9 35.8 6.7 16.1<br />

CH, 6.1 5.3 32.3 77.6<br />

C: 0.5 0.4 0.6 1.5<br />

H2S 2.1 1.8 2.6 0<br />

FIGURE 4. CDNCEFTUAL FLCWSXET FOR DIFHT NEE3ATNATION OF<br />

SIAGGING LLTRGI FA!$ GASES<br />

115<br />

4.1<br />

0<br />

0.1<br />

0.8<br />

4.7<br />

92.7<br />

1.7<br />

0


VARIATIONS IN THE INORGANIC CHEMISTRY OF COAL<br />

W.S. Fyfe, B.I. Kronberg, Department <strong>of</strong> Geology, The University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario,<br />

London, Canada<br />

J. R. Brown, Energy Research Labor<strong>at</strong>ories, Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, Mines and Resources,<br />

Ottawa, Canada<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> reflects its complex physical and chemical history.<br />

Throughout <strong>coal</strong> genesis, from accumul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> plant debris and during subsequent<br />

<strong>coal</strong>ific<strong>at</strong>ion, solute species in ground w<strong>at</strong>ers are constantly exchanged with <strong>the</strong><br />

porous and reducing carbonaceous debris. From existing geochemical d<strong>at</strong>a (e.g.,<br />

Wedepohl, 1969; Kronberg et al., 1981), it appears th<strong>at</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and <strong>coal</strong>-rel<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

m<strong>at</strong>erials (pe<strong>at</strong>, lignite, etc.) may incorpor<strong>at</strong>e and accumul<strong>at</strong>e a complex array <strong>of</strong><br />

elements. To some extent <strong>coal</strong> deposits acts as gigantic carbon filters through<br />

which ground w<strong>at</strong>ers wash <strong>the</strong> products <strong>of</strong> rock leaching.<br />

cerning <strong>the</strong> exact siting <strong>of</strong> trace elements in <strong>coal</strong> and <strong>the</strong>se elements <strong>at</strong> times<br />

<strong>at</strong>tain ore grade (e.g., U, Mo).<br />

The modern large-scale g a-’) burning <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> may have ramific<strong>at</strong>ions not<br />

only for <strong>the</strong> global carbon cycle but contingent on <strong>the</strong>ir f<strong>at</strong>es during combustion,<br />

also for <strong>the</strong> global cycle <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r elements concentr<strong>at</strong>ed in <strong>coal</strong>. For example <strong>the</strong><br />

deposition over <strong>the</strong> past five decades <strong>of</strong> char<strong>coal</strong> as well as several metals (Cr,<br />

Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, Sn and Pb) in Lake Michigan sediments correl<strong>at</strong>es with<br />

vari<strong>at</strong>ions (oil, <strong>coal</strong>, wood, install<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> control devices) in fuel use (Goldberg<br />

et al., 1981). Associ<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>coal</strong> combustion is <strong>the</strong> accumul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> easily leachable<br />

ash. O<strong>the</strong>r recent work (Chapelle, 1980) shows th<strong>at</strong> some metals (Cr, Ni, Zn,<br />

Cd, Pb) sorbed onto surfaces <strong>of</strong> Fe-A1-0 phases in ash are easily leached by percol<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

w<strong>at</strong>ers.<br />

Here discussion is confined to <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transition metals,<br />

some <strong>of</strong> which are known to play c<strong>at</strong>alytic roles in <strong>coal</strong> combustion and to <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> halogens. The presence <strong>of</strong> F and C1 <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> per cent levels in some<br />

<strong>coal</strong>s is significant for combustion technologies (concerned with corrosion problems,<br />

etc.) and for problems rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>at</strong>mospheric emissions.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

Very little is known con-<br />

The analytical d<strong>at</strong>a reported here pertain to samples <strong>of</strong> raw <strong>coal</strong>, ash from <strong>coal</strong>,<br />

lignite and tar sand, as well as NBS standard reference <strong>coal</strong>s and <strong>coal</strong> ash. The non-<br />

reference <strong>coal</strong>s are bituminous <strong>coal</strong>s from Western Canadian mines, hosted in Creta-<br />

ceous form<strong>at</strong>ions. The lignites are from North Dakota and Ontario, and <strong>the</strong> tar sand<br />

from Fort McMurray, Alberta. The British Columbia <strong>coal</strong>s (samples 2-6, Table 1) are<br />

from different seams in <strong>the</strong> same mine, as are <strong>the</strong> Alberta <strong>coal</strong>s (samples 7-9). The<br />

sample numbers correspond to those appearing in more detailed analytical reports<br />

(Kronberg et al., 1981; Brown et al., 1981a, b). The analytical techniques employed<br />

in all <strong>the</strong>se studies are spark source mass spectroscopy (SSMS) and electron spectro-<br />

scopy for chemical analysis (ESCA) .<br />

SSMS is useful for surveying <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> 60-70 elements in a single<br />

analysis. However, it is necessary to pre-ash or o<strong>the</strong>rwise pre-tre<strong>at</strong> samples containing<br />

substantial m<strong>at</strong>erial <strong>of</strong> low mass number, which easily forms poly<strong>at</strong>omic<br />

positive ions. Coal, due to its high carbon content exemplifies this difficulty,<br />

and an unmanageable number <strong>of</strong> interferences appear in <strong>the</strong> mass spectral record <strong>of</strong><br />

raw <strong>coal</strong>. In this study <strong>the</strong> samples <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s, lignites and tar sand were dry ashed<br />

for 4-6 hours <strong>at</strong> 6OO0C in a muffle furnace. Sample electrodes, prepared by mixing<br />

<strong>the</strong> ash with pure graphite (Taylor, 1965), were sparked in a JEOL mass spectrometer


(JMS-OlBM-2). The mass spectra were recorded photographically and interpreted semiquantit<strong>at</strong>ively<br />

using USGS standards (Flanagan, 1973). With regard to <strong>the</strong> analysis<br />

Of <strong>coal</strong>s and o<strong>the</strong>r geological m<strong>at</strong>erials (soils, Mn nodules, rocks, volcanic ash,<br />

deep-sea sediments, etc.) <strong>the</strong> analytical uncertainty is within <strong>the</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ion encountered<br />

using normal sampling techniques.<br />

ESCA is a spectroscopic surface sensitive technique by which <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

<strong>of</strong> all eleinents (except H) can be surveyed semi-quantit<strong>at</strong>ively to a surface depth <strong>of</strong><br />

1-5 nm. Detection limits are -10-9 g cm-2 <strong>of</strong> surface (~0.1 bulk wt. %). Thus for<br />

geological m<strong>at</strong>erials, semi-quantit<strong>at</strong>ive inform<strong>at</strong>ion can be obtained for major elements<br />

and for surface concentr<strong>at</strong>ed minor and trace elements (Brown, 1978; Bancr<strong>of</strong>t<br />

et al., 1979). There are several advantages <strong>of</strong> ESCA for <strong>coal</strong> analysis: (1) ESCA<br />

is non-destructive. (2) It is <strong>of</strong>ten possible to ga<strong>the</strong>r details on <strong>the</strong> in situ<br />

chemistry <strong>of</strong> elements (oxid<strong>at</strong>ion st<strong>at</strong>e, coordin<strong>at</strong>ion number, etc.). (3) Both raw<br />

<strong>coal</strong> and <strong>coal</strong> ash may be analysed. Ashing effectively concentr<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong> mineral<br />

fraction in <strong>coal</strong> by an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude, permitting concentr<strong>at</strong>ion measurement <strong>of</strong><br />

additional elements. Surface concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> elements (e.g., F, S) during combustion<br />

by surface sorption reactions may be monitored. (4) ESCA multi-element scans<br />

may be done quickly (% 1 hour) and may be useful in fingerprinting <strong>coal</strong>s.<br />

ESCA spectra were recorded using a McPherson 26 spetrometer equipped with an<br />

aluminum anode oper<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>at</strong> 200 w<strong>at</strong>ts. Details <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ESCA procedures used for<br />

this study are available elsewhere (Brown et al., 1981a, b).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The concentr<strong>at</strong>ions, obtained by SSMS (Table l), <strong>of</strong> transition metals and halogens<br />

for some North American <strong>coal</strong>s and <strong>coal</strong>-rel<strong>at</strong>ed m<strong>at</strong>erials are compared (Table 2)<br />

to d<strong>at</strong>a available for <strong>coal</strong> from various sources and to crustal abundances. The<br />

chaotic concentr<strong>at</strong>ion p<strong>at</strong>terns for many elements are a reflection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complexity<br />

<strong>of</strong> chemical and physical processes associ<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>coal</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion. The extreme<br />

vari<strong>at</strong>ion is possibly rel<strong>at</strong>ed to local ground w<strong>at</strong>er chemistry and to <strong>the</strong> local<br />

permeability <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and enclosing str<strong>at</strong>a. With respect to crustal abundances (CA),<br />

both <strong>the</strong> transition metal and halogen concentr<strong>at</strong>ions, range from strongly depleted<br />

(less than 10-fold CA) to strongly enriched (gre<strong>at</strong>er than 10-fold CA). The d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

from o<strong>the</strong>r sources include those from <strong>coal</strong> deposits on o<strong>the</strong>r continents, and <strong>the</strong><br />

wide concentr<strong>at</strong>ion ranges may be an expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> Earth processes<br />

leading to <strong>coal</strong> deposition and form<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> transition metals (Table 1) Sc, Y and Zr appear <strong>the</strong> least mobile. The<br />

vari<strong>at</strong>ions in Nb concentr<strong>at</strong>ions are intriguing and Nb may be more mobile or may be<br />

hosted in phases distributed more unevenly. The vari<strong>at</strong>ion in Ti concentr<strong>at</strong>ions is<br />

noteworthy, and chemical migr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Ti in associ<strong>at</strong>ion with <strong>coal</strong> diagenesis has<br />

been noted (Degens, 1958).<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong>re is evidence for <strong>the</strong> chemical coupling<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ti (and Zr) compounds to enzymes and o<strong>the</strong>r biologically active macromolecules<br />

(Kennedy, 1979). Fur<strong>the</strong>r, Taylor et al. (1981) have shown th<strong>at</strong> Mg, Ca, Ti, Fe,<br />

Cu, Zn species in <strong>coal</strong> may be extracted by organic solvents.<br />

Our knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> halogens and <strong>the</strong>ir mode <strong>of</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion in<br />

<strong>coal</strong> is vague. River and ground w<strong>at</strong>ers flowing into <strong>coal</strong> basins would contribute<br />

substantial amounts <strong>of</strong> C1. It could be introduced by rain and aerosols ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

directly or transferred via <strong>the</strong> biosphere. The sources <strong>of</strong> Br and F are less certain.<br />

F could be added during deposition by <strong>the</strong> influx <strong>of</strong> fine-grained detrital minerals<br />

or volcanic ash.<br />

No. 8 (Table 3).<br />

For example, fluorite (CaF2) is observed in <strong>the</strong> ESCA scan <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

In <strong>the</strong> ESCA scans <strong>of</strong> raw <strong>coal</strong>s (Table 31, <strong>the</strong> largest peaks correspond to <strong>the</strong><br />

detection signals for carbon (C Is) and oxygen (0 Is). O<strong>the</strong>r elements detected<br />

included Al, Si, Ca, sometimes S, and in some samples substantial F and C1. Large<br />

117


vari<strong>at</strong>ions, indic<strong>at</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> counts per second during ESCA analysis, are<br />

<strong>at</strong>tributed to chemical vari<strong>at</strong>ions in <strong>coal</strong> surfaces. The differences in carbon peak<br />

positions were <strong>of</strong> interest especially in sample no. 8, for which <strong>the</strong> C 1s peak posi-<br />

tion is indic<strong>at</strong>ive <strong>of</strong> graphitic carbon and this scan also contains <strong>the</strong> largest F 1s<br />

signal.<br />

Recently, an examin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> raw <strong>coal</strong> macerals by XPS indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> fisinite<br />

displays characteristics (C 1s binding energy 284.4 eV) essentially identical to<br />

pure graphite. It was also observed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> vitrinite fraction <strong>of</strong> a western<br />

Canadian <strong>coal</strong> sample was gre<strong>at</strong>ly enriched (> 1 wt. percentage) in an organically<br />

found fluorine species, ~(CFZ)~ type.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> ESCA scans <strong>of</strong> ashed <strong>coal</strong>s (Table 4) many more elements (Na, Mg, Ti and<br />

Fe) a peared and <strong>the</strong> F 1s and S 2s peaks are enhanced. S appearing both as SO:and<br />

S8- is likely associ<strong>at</strong>ed with Fe as iron sulphide (pyrite), <strong>the</strong> outer shell<br />

oxidized to sulph<strong>at</strong>e by combustion. The concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> Al, Ca, Ti and Fe in<br />

NBS reference ash (1633a) measured by ESCA (using <strong>the</strong> Si 2s peak as a reference)<br />

agree well with recommended values. In <strong>the</strong> ash, F and S surface concentr<strong>at</strong>ions are<br />

much gre<strong>at</strong>er than those observed in <strong>the</strong> bulk samples, and this could be evidence for<br />

preferential siting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se elements on ash surfaces. C1 was not detected on <strong>the</strong><br />

ash surfaces by ESCA, in contrast to <strong>the</strong> high signals noted on raw <strong>coal</strong> surfaces,<br />

and C1 may be removed in <strong>the</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile phase during combustion.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The combined use <strong>of</strong> SSMS and ESCA results was successful in part in overcoming <strong>the</strong><br />

unique analytical difficulties presented by <strong>the</strong> heterogeneous chemical and physical<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> intim<strong>at</strong>ely combined inorganic and organic species in <strong>coal</strong>. These<br />

techniques and modific<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m are applicable to <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion<br />

chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> as well as to <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> environmental impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

uti1 iz<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Babu, S.P. (Ed.) 1975. Trace elements in fuels. Adv. Chem. Ser. 141. Am. Chem.<br />

SOC., Washington, D.C. 214 pp.<br />

Bancr<strong>of</strong>t, G.M., Brown, J.R., and Fyfe, W.S. 1979. Advances in, and applic<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong>,<br />

x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ESCA) in mineralogy and geochemistry.<br />

25, 227-243.<br />

Chem. Geol.<br />

Brown, J.R. 1979. Adsorption <strong>of</strong> metal ions by calcite and iron sulphides: A quantit<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

XPS study.<br />

220 pp.<br />

Ph.D. <strong>the</strong>sis, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, London, Ontario,<br />

Brown, J.R., Kronberg, B.I., and Fyfe, W.S. 1981,a. Semi-quantit<strong>at</strong>ive ESCA examina-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> ash surfaces. FUEL 60: 439-446.<br />

Brown, J.R., Kronberg, B.I., and Fyfe, W.S. 1981,b. An ESCA examin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

and <strong>coal</strong> ash surfaces, In: Proceedings "Coal: Phoenix <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> '80's" (ed. A.M.<br />

A1 Taweel), 64th Canadian Chemical Conference, Halifax, N.S.<br />

Chapelle, F.H. 1980. A proposed model for predicting trace metal composition <strong>of</strong><br />

fly-ash leach<strong>at</strong>es. Environ. Geol. 3(3): 117-122.<br />

Oegens, E.T. 1958. Geochemische Untersuchungen zur Faziesbestimung im Ruhrkarbon<br />

und im Saarkarbon. Gluckauf, Jg. 94, Essen.<br />

118


I<br />

I<br />

Fairbridge, R.W. (ed.) 1972, Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> geochemistry and environmental earth<br />

\ sciences series, Vol. IVA, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1321 pp.<br />

I Flanagan, F.J. 1973.<br />

1972 values for intern<strong>at</strong>ional geochemical reference samples.<br />

' Geochim. Cosmochim Acta 37: 1189-1200.<br />

Goldberg, E.D., Hodge, V.F., Griffin, J.J., Koide, M. and Edgington, D.N. 1981.<br />

\ Impact <strong>of</strong>fossil fuel combustion on <strong>the</strong> sediments <strong>of</strong> Lake Michigan. Envir. SCi. &<br />

Tech. 15 (4): 466-471.<br />

Goldschmidt, V.M. 1954.<br />

Geochemistry, Claredon press, Oxford 730 pp.<br />

Kennedy, J.F., 1979. Transition-metal oxide chel<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> carbohydr<strong>at</strong>e-directed macro-<br />

' molecules. Chem. SOC. Rev. 8 (2) 221-257.<br />

Kronberg, B.I., Brown, J.R., Fyfe, W.S., Peirce, M. and Winder, C.G. 1981. Distri-<br />

btuions <strong>of</strong> trace elements in western Canadian <strong>coal</strong> ashes. FUEL 60: 59-63.<br />

Taylor, S.R. 1965. Geochemical analysis by spark sourc-mass spectrography. Geochim.<br />

Cosmochim. Acta 29: 1234-1261.<br />

Taylor, L.T., Hausler, D.W. and Squires, A.M. 1981. Organically bound metals in a<br />

solvent-refined <strong>coal</strong> : metallograms for a Wyoming subbituminous <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

644-646.<br />

Science, 213,<br />

Wedepohl, K.H. 1969. Handbook <strong>of</strong> Geochemistry. Springer-verlag, Berlin.<br />

119


c .Q- --<br />

v) o(D<br />

m 0 o m<br />

w o-<br />

-m<br />

m o o o ; o Z Z<br />

ooo m o 0 0 c<br />

u(Dm 7 0 0<br />

- A m<br />

.- oal Y<br />

:.;No o o o<br />

urn-%<br />

0- c .-<br />

r<br />

o<br />

m o o 0 20<br />

o-<br />

0 0 0 0 0 L n<br />

m o m o o w<br />

v) o<br />

000<br />

h O m 0 2 2<br />

L n A<br />

o m 0 o m<br />

w o - n w -<br />

u,<br />

o m o o m m<br />

m o 00u,<br />

9 -<br />

- - -<br />

O N 0 o m<br />

e m 0 m<br />

- o m 0 o m<br />

5: 0 "-<br />

Norno o m<br />

5: 0 e-<br />

N o<br />

n<br />

o o ~ m ~ o m o o - o<br />

010 .-- no-<br />

N O N<br />

N<br />

N n<br />

n<br />

o ~ m m m o m o o ~ o<br />

0- - o Y<br />

9<br />

N<br />

o o o o m o o o n.0 -<br />

op1womm (DO-o<br />

0- .- - N N<br />

0<br />

N 0<br />

N<br />

~ m o o d m o<br />

W<br />

(D<br />

m<br />

O O O O O O O O<br />

o-m(DDN No-<br />

0 - - N -<br />

~ m<br />

0<br />

~ O<br />

o<br />

~<br />

m o<br />

O O O O 0 O O O n O<br />

u m ' o e N O * v - - N<br />

m o<br />

0000000000<br />

q m m u N O * -<br />

.-- - N<br />

N<br />

0000000000-<br />

o n v ) m " N O ~ O<br />

o*-*- - N<br />

0<br />

7<br />

N 0<br />

o m o ~<br />

--wo<br />

o o o<br />

e o -<br />

N<br />

n o "<br />

m<br />

nmooooono-<br />

- - m u eo- - N<br />

m 0<br />

O ~ O O<br />

- - w o<br />

U<br />

O O O<br />

00-<br />

N<br />

O ~ O<br />

m<br />

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

o e m m q -ro<br />

0- - - N<br />

u ~ -<br />

-<br />

0<br />

120


v- W<br />

V<br />

z<br />

d<br />

3 z<br />

m<br />

4<br />

?<br />

P<br />

m W<br />

c3<br />

W<br />

m Nb . .<br />

m m 03 w N r- N 0 c 0<br />

N m W r - r n W N<br />

7<br />

0 0 0<br />

0 0 0 0 0<br />

0 0 W o,go, 0 oro,o,8$8Z<br />

m o m o N 0 o O 3<br />

~-O-N.XIN m w ~ ~ - o m m<br />

I I I l l I I I I 1 0 1 I 1<br />

W O O N W O 0mmor.cLn W N<br />

m c m T- d<br />

c 2 G Z S - --<br />

0<br />

0<br />

In0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

r.0 a0r.m m o w o m m o 7 0<br />

-- m m ~ c N c c C U N N M<br />

I I m l I I I I I I I I I IT":<br />

- W O d N O r n ~ m o ~ r n o r n a ,<br />

r. m P-<br />

C U . 7 U<br />

r- V<br />

0<br />

m L<br />

c,<br />

0 0 0<br />

o o o o m<br />

rnlnOONLn<br />

h Ar-mr-c<br />

I I I I I I<br />

5 o c m o o m<br />

m o c .<br />

m o<br />

o o o o m o o 0<br />

m m m o . N O O O O<br />

0<br />

V<br />

N<br />

P-<br />

m<br />

7<br />

m<br />

W<br />

m -<br />

d m<br />

c m<br />

c,<br />

-0<br />

.r<br />

E<br />

V VI<br />

-0<br />

c<br />

c3 0<br />

V<br />

- d 7 u o . - ~ e ~<br />

m<br />

r-<br />

m m<br />

I I I I I I I I I I<br />

m m o r n ~ m o c u m r n<br />

10 . W<br />

0<br />

7<br />

121<br />

h<br />

-0 3<br />

+-,<br />

VI<br />

VI<br />

.c<br />

.c i-'<br />

m<br />

N<br />

r.<br />

m -<br />

W<br />

ISI<br />

-0<br />

.r<br />

L<br />

n<br />

L<br />

.-<br />

u.<br />

mJ<br />

9-


122<br />

vw .- c<br />

.2 m<br />

L<br />

w<br />

u .- e<br />

- U<br />

-<br />

mc c<br />

m s<br />

2::<br />

u w<br />

0 3<br />

L U<br />

V<br />

s2 . w c<br />

- 0 7<br />

e::<br />

0 0<br />

.-<br />

u<br />

Lo v<br />

n W<br />

. a % .<br />

0<br />

w v<br />

N W<br />

2<br />

U<br />

3 f "<br />

4 0 -<br />

c m o<br />

m<br />

u0 - c<br />

-4 0 .-<br />

' I t<br />

u m a<br />

= V I -<br />

w ow - m<br />

2 5<br />

e m .-<br />

m<br />

u w<br />

u v<br />

Vw I - 3<br />

2 .?<br />

v-0<br />

2 :<br />

m3 m 3<br />

. m m<br />

B l l<br />

U U I<br />

w c c<br />

uU wC Y w<br />

- 00c 0 c<br />

U Y U<br />

c oc c u<br />

. , a 0<br />

0 1 2 .<br />

. a x<br />

z u o<br />

0 L D<br />

il


e.<br />

\<br />

I<br />

,<br />

W<br />

2<br />

m<br />

4 t-<br />

CI<br />

99-79<br />

noooo<br />

123<br />

m<br />

w<br />

a<br />

L<br />

h w<br />

o<br />

L3<br />

z


ANALYSIS OF SUB-MICRON MINERAL MATTER IN COAL VIA SCANNING TRANSMISSION<br />

ELECTRON MICROSCOPY*<br />

Robert M. Allen and John B. VanderSande**<br />

M<strong>at</strong>eri a1 s Science Division<br />

Sandia N<strong>at</strong>ional Labor<strong>at</strong>ories<br />

Livermore, California 94550<br />

**Department <strong>of</strong> M<strong>at</strong>erials Science and Engineering<br />

Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Cambridge, Massachusetts 021 39<br />

The mineral m<strong>at</strong>ter present in <strong>coal</strong> plays a deleterious role during <strong>the</strong> combustion<br />

<strong>of</strong> pulverized <strong>coal</strong> fuel in power gener<strong>at</strong>ing boilers. Recent papers (1-3)<br />

on such problems as he<strong>at</strong> exchanger fouling and <strong>the</strong> emission <strong>of</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>e<br />

pollutants from boilers have indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> a fundamental understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

problems (and hence clues as to how <strong>the</strong>y may be mitig<strong>at</strong>ed) may not depend solely<br />

on analyzing <strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> mineral m<strong>at</strong>ter in <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and its gross chemical<br />

composition. It may also prove necessary to obtain d<strong>at</strong>a on <strong>the</strong> actual size<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> original mineral particles and inclusions, and <strong>the</strong> distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se minerals among <strong>the</strong> particles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pulverized fuel.<br />

Such detailed inform<strong>at</strong>ion cannot be obtained by <strong>the</strong> traditional means <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

minerals analysis, However, recent advances in electron optical instrument<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

and techniques, such as <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a scanning transmission electron microscope<br />

(STEM) for high sp<strong>at</strong>ial resolution chemical microanalysis, show gre<strong>at</strong> promise for<br />

this type <strong>of</strong> characteriz<strong>at</strong>ion and have already been applied to <strong>coal</strong> research (4-7)-<br />

The present work involves <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a STEM both to obtain quantit<strong>at</strong>ive inform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

about <strong>the</strong> ultra-fine (d00nm diameter) mineral inclusions present in several <strong>coal</strong>s,<br />

and to examine <strong>the</strong> inorganic elements (hereafter referred to as inherent mineral<br />

m<strong>at</strong>ter) <strong>at</strong>omically bound into <strong>the</strong> organic m<strong>at</strong>rices <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>coal</strong>s. It is anticip<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

th<strong>at</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> inform<strong>at</strong>ion will be useful in modeling <strong>the</strong> combustion<br />

<strong>of</strong> pulverized fuel particles,<br />

Sample Prepar<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Samples <strong>of</strong> three different <strong>coal</strong>s were examined in <strong>the</strong> present study: A<br />

lignite from <strong>the</strong> Hagel Seam in North Dakota, a semianthracite from <strong>the</strong> #2 Seam in<br />

Pennsylvania, and a sample <strong>of</strong> pulverized bituminous <strong>coal</strong> obtained courtesy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Tennessee Valley Authority.<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure ash (HTA) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se three <strong>coal</strong>s is shown in Table I,<br />

Prepar<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> specimens for STEM examin<strong>at</strong>ion was straightforward. Samples<br />

<strong>of</strong> each <strong>coal</strong> were ground to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle (except for<br />

<strong>the</strong> fuel <strong>coal</strong> which was already in pulverized form), A standard 3mm diameter 200<br />

mesh copper transmission electron microscope grid co<strong>at</strong>ed with a thin carbon support<br />

film was <strong>the</strong>n dipped into <strong>the</strong> powdered <strong>coal</strong>. Upon removal <strong>the</strong> grid was<br />

tapped several times to shake <strong>of</strong>f excess and oversize particles. The final<br />

result was a sample consisting <strong>of</strong> a thin dispersion <strong>of</strong> fine <strong>coal</strong> particles clinging<br />

to <strong>the</strong> carbon support film.<br />

Specimens prepared in this manner are well suited for STEM viewing and have<br />

several advantages compared to specimens thinned from <strong>the</strong> bulk by microtoming<br />

or ion milling.<br />

The gross inorganic chemical analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> high<br />

Their most notable advantage is <strong>of</strong> course <strong>the</strong> ease <strong>of</strong> prepar<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Along with this, since nearly all <strong>the</strong> particles clinging to <strong>the</strong> grid have <strong>at</strong> least<br />

some area transparent to <strong>the</strong> electron beam, a much gre<strong>at</strong>er amount <strong>of</strong> thin area<br />

more randomly dispersed in origin from within <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> is potentially available<br />

for STEM examin<strong>at</strong>ion than would be found in specimens thinned from bulk samples,<br />

Results obtained from powdered <strong>coal</strong> specimens should <strong>the</strong>refore be more represent<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall mineral content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> initial <strong>coal</strong> saniDle.<br />

*This work supported by U,S. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, DOE, under contract number<br />

DE-AC04-76DP00798.<br />

124


L<br />

Table I: Compositions <strong>of</strong> High Temper<strong>at</strong>ure Ash (HTA)<br />

Coal Name<br />

Coal Rank<br />

%H TA<br />

Si02(%a)***<br />

A120 (%a)<br />

Ti 023%a)<br />

Fe 20 3( %a )<br />

MgO (%a)<br />

CaO( %a)<br />

Na20( %a)<br />

K20(%a)<br />

P205(%a)<br />

s03( %a)<br />

Trace Elements<br />

>1000ppm <strong>of</strong> HTA<br />

(in ppm <strong>of</strong> HTA)<br />

Hagel Seam*<br />

Lignite<br />

9.66<br />

28,20<br />

9.35<br />

0.58<br />

8.20<br />

5,91<br />

24 50<br />

2.81<br />

0.33<br />

0.10<br />

17.40<br />

Ba-6700<br />

Sr-3150<br />

Cumber1 and Fuel **<br />

High Vol<strong>at</strong>ile<br />

Bituminous<br />

18.8<br />

51 .3<br />

19.8<br />

002<br />

17.0<br />

1.2<br />

4.9<br />

oo9<br />

2.8<br />

0.2<br />

1.6<br />

Not<br />

Available<br />

Pennsylvania<br />

#2 Seam*<br />

Semianthracite<br />

30.74<br />

80 .OO<br />

12,lO<br />

3.09<br />

1.47<br />

0.05<br />

0.30<br />

0.05<br />

0-35<br />

0,05<br />

0,30<br />

None<br />

Reported<br />

"Inform<strong>at</strong>ion courtesy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Penn St<strong>at</strong>e Coal D<strong>at</strong>a Base<br />

**Inform<strong>at</strong>ion taken from reference (8).<br />

***%a - oxide % <strong>of</strong> HTA <strong>of</strong> dry <strong>coal</strong><br />

Experimental Procedure<br />

The STEM used in <strong>the</strong> present study was a JOEL 200CX equipped with a Tracor-<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn T!42000 energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) system for x-ray analysis<br />

The fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> STEM oper<strong>at</strong>ion pertinent to this work are illustr<strong>at</strong>ed in Figure 1,<br />

The sample was illumin<strong>at</strong>ed by a narrow probe <strong>of</strong> 200kV electrons which was scanned<br />

across its surface. Transmitted electrons were used to form an image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample<br />

volume being scanned, The probe could also be stopped and fixed on some fe<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

<strong>of</strong> interest in <strong>the</strong> sample, <strong>at</strong> which point <strong>the</strong> characteristic x-rays emitted by <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>at</strong>oms under <strong>the</strong> probe could be analyzed to obtain chemical inform<strong>at</strong>ion from a<br />

sample region with a diameter approaching th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> probe diameter. Chemical<br />

characteriz<strong>at</strong>ion could be accomplished in this manner for all elements with <strong>at</strong>omic<br />

number 2211<br />

For studies <strong>of</strong> mineral m<strong>at</strong>ter embedded in particles <strong>of</strong> powdered <strong>coal</strong>, advan-<br />

tage was taken <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> difference in image contrast between <strong>the</strong> crystalline<br />

mineral particles and <strong>the</strong> surrounding amorphous organic m<strong>at</strong>rix. The crystalline<br />

particles are capable <strong>of</strong> diffracting electrons, and so appeared in strong contrast<br />

when held <strong>at</strong> specific angles to <strong>the</strong> incident electron beam.<br />

needed only to be tilted through some moder<strong>at</strong>e range <strong>of</strong> angles (generally + 45"<br />

from <strong>the</strong> horizontal) to quickly establish <strong>the</strong> loc<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> minerals wiThin<br />

a given <strong>coal</strong> particle. During <strong>the</strong> tilting such particles abruptly "winked" in and<br />

out <strong>of</strong> strong diffractiDn contrast, while <strong>the</strong> amorphous m<strong>at</strong>rix changed contrast<br />

only gradually as a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> change in sample thickness intercepted by<br />

<strong>the</strong> electron beam. An example <strong>of</strong> an image <strong>of</strong> a mineral particle visible by strong<br />

diffraction contrast amidst an amorphous <strong>coal</strong> m<strong>at</strong>rix is shown in Figure 2,<br />

estim<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> imaging procedure could detect mineral particles with diameters<br />

>-2nm. Particles smaller than this would most likely remain indistinguishable<br />

from <strong>the</strong> amorphous m<strong>at</strong>rix,<br />

llith <strong>the</strong> loc<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> an embedded mineral particle thus determined, <strong>the</strong> probe<br />

was fixed on <strong>the</strong> mineral and an x-ray spectrum was acquired, Except in <strong>the</strong> instance<br />

where <strong>the</strong> mineral extended through <strong>the</strong> full thickness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> particle<br />

intercepted by <strong>the</strong> probe, this spectrum consisted <strong>of</strong> a superposition <strong>of</strong> a particle<br />

spectrum and a m<strong>at</strong>rix spectrum.<br />

The sample thus<br />

To determine <strong>the</strong> signal associ<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong><br />

It is<br />

inclusion, <strong>the</strong> probe was subsequently moved 1-2 particle diameters away to a region<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>at</strong>rix known to be free <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r minerals (within <strong>the</strong> resolution limit<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

125


discussed in <strong>the</strong> preceeding paragraph), where a second spectrum was collected.<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two x-ray spectra generally quickly revealed <strong>the</strong> primary ele-<br />

mental constituents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mineral (again, for elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>at</strong>omic number Z~ll)~<br />

Two examples <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> analysis are shown for a Ti-rich particle in <strong>the</strong><br />

Cumberland fuel <strong>coal</strong> in Figure 3, and a particle rich in Ba and S in <strong>the</strong> Hagel<br />

Seam <strong>coal</strong> in Figure 4.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> STEM examin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three <strong>coal</strong>s are summarized in<br />

Table 11. The first half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> table deals with <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a obtained in a random<br />

sampling <strong>of</strong> mineral inclusions with mean diameters 15% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total mineral m<strong>at</strong>ter in<br />

pulverized fuels (8).<br />

Table 11: Results <strong>of</strong> STEEl Analysis<br />

Coal Name<br />

Total # <strong>of</strong> Particles<br />

Hagel Seam Cumber1 and Fuel Penn.#2 Seam<br />

Analyzed (dia. (100nm): 29<br />

Pre domi na n t Part i c 1 e -Types *<br />

Major Elements Fe<br />

30<br />

Ti<br />

27<br />

Ca<br />

#1 Number Observed 15<br />

Average Diameter (nn) 43217<br />

Possible species** -<br />

14<br />

45+22<br />

Ti n2 ( Rut i 1 e )<br />

11<br />

45+27<br />

CaQ(~a1cite)<br />

__---_-----------------------------------<br />

#2<br />

Major Elements<br />

Number Observed<br />

Average Diameter(nm)<br />

Ba ,S<br />

7<br />

60228<br />

Ca<br />

5<br />

50+17<br />

Ti<br />

10<br />

36+13<br />

Possible species** BaSOq(Barite) CarO’~~(Calci te) Tin2( Rutile)<br />

# <strong>of</strong> Different M<strong>at</strong>rix<br />

Areas Analyzed :<br />

Most Common Signal<br />

25<br />

21 24<br />

From Organic I4<strong>at</strong>rix:<br />

Frequency <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Most Common Signal<br />

(% <strong>of</strong> Total # <strong>of</strong> Areas<br />

Ca<br />

Si, A1 S<br />

Analyzed):<br />

Frequency <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> S Signal from M<strong>at</strong>rix<br />

(X <strong>of</strong> Total # <strong>of</strong> Areas<br />

96%<br />

90% 4 2%<br />

Analyzed) : 28%<br />

43% 42%<br />

*The two most frequently observed particle types for particles with mean diameters<br />

51OOnm. C<strong>at</strong>egoriz<strong>at</strong>ion into types is based on major elements (Z~ll)<br />

observed in x-ray spectra <strong>at</strong>tributable to particles.<br />

**Tent<strong>at</strong>ive identific<strong>at</strong>ion based on major elements (Z~ll) found in spectra.<br />

Species listed are <strong>the</strong> most common minerals found in <strong>coal</strong> which could produce<br />

<strong>the</strong> observed spectra.<br />

1 ignite,<br />

No clear choice exists for <strong>the</strong> Fe-rich particles in <strong>the</strong><br />

12 6


\<br />

"<br />

\<br />

I For all three <strong>coal</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> predominant mineral species observed in <strong>the</strong> (100nm<br />

size range would not be predicted from <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chemical analyses <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ure ash <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s. None <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major elements (Z>ll) observed<br />

(with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> sulfur in <strong>the</strong> Ba,S-rich particles) constitutes more than 10%<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> HTA for <strong>the</strong> respective <strong>coal</strong>s; indeed, Ba in <strong>the</strong> lignite, Ti in <strong>the</strong> bitu-<br />

minous <strong>coal</strong>, and Ca in <strong>the</strong> semianthracite all make up less than 1% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> respec-<br />

tive ashes.<br />

dominant mineral species observed in a random sampling <strong>of</strong> particles


1<br />

Character istic<br />

x-rays<br />

-////<br />

200k V<br />

Electron Probe<br />

+- lOnm + Analyzes Particles<br />


4 ,<br />

1024<br />

1024<br />

3a<br />

3b J<br />

Mineral Particle in<br />

Bituminous Coal<br />

x-ray counts<br />

Bituminous Coal<br />

Background<br />

x-ray counts<br />

Cu (grid)'+<br />

-<br />

Cu (grid)*-<br />

Figure 3: Examples <strong>of</strong> x-ray spectra from <strong>the</strong> bituminous sample,<br />

a. Spectrum from particle shown in Figure 2,<br />

bo Accompanying background spectrum.<br />

129<br />

f<br />

3<br />

4 3<br />

I


4 ,<br />

256<br />

4a<br />

4b<br />

Mineral Particle<br />

in Lignite<br />

Cu (grid)+<br />

x-ray counts<br />

Cu (grid)+<br />

Lignite Background<br />

256 x-ray counts<br />

Figure 4: Examples <strong>of</strong> x-ray spectra from <strong>the</strong> lignite sample.<br />

a,<br />

b.<br />

Spectrum from 40nm diameter particle,<br />

Accompanying background spectrum,<br />

130<br />

a<br />

4<br />

a 5<br />

I


The Determin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Mineral Distribution? in Bituminous Coals<br />

by Electron Microscopy<br />

L. A. Harris<br />

Oak Ridge N<strong>at</strong>ional Labor<strong>at</strong>ory<br />

P. 0. Box X<br />

Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The chemistry and concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> mineral m<strong>at</strong>ter in <strong>coal</strong>s are factors th<strong>at</strong> play<br />

important roles in <strong>coal</strong> combustion. For example, fouling, slagging, corrosion, and<br />

erosion are all mineral dependent processes th<strong>at</strong> occur in <strong>coal</strong>-fired steam plants.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong>se processes, fouling and slagging are probably <strong>the</strong> mst detrimental to steam<br />

plant efficiency.<br />

Attempts to predict <strong>the</strong> fouling and/or slagging potential <strong>of</strong> a<br />

given <strong>coal</strong> have led to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> equ<strong>at</strong>ions based upon <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>ios <strong>of</strong> base to<br />

acid minerals multiplied by ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> sulfur or sodium content. (1,Z) Essentially,<br />

<strong>the</strong>se r<strong>at</strong>ios take into account <strong>the</strong> lowering <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ash fusion temper<strong>at</strong>ure as a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> increased alkali bearing minerals.<br />

In addition to <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> mineral m<strong>at</strong>ter on steam plant oper<strong>at</strong>ions, mineral<br />

m<strong>at</strong>ter also contributes to <strong>at</strong>mospheric particul<strong>at</strong>es via steam plant stack emissions.<br />

Methods for reducing and/or altering <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> minerals in <strong>coal</strong> are limited by<br />

<strong>the</strong> size and distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> minerals which is in turn rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> origin <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> minerals, namely, whe<strong>the</strong>r syngenetic or epigenetic. As reported by Mackowsky (3)<br />

epigenetic minerals can be mure readily removed from <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> because <strong>the</strong>y are not as<br />

intim<strong>at</strong>ely mixed with <strong>the</strong> organic constituents (macerals) as syngenetic minerals.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> epigenetic minerals may be considerably different from <strong>the</strong><br />

syngenetic minerals due to differences in environments <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> deposition<br />

and/or growth.<br />

Currently, a common procedure for identifying minerals in <strong>coal</strong>s consists <strong>of</strong><br />

firstly low temper<strong>at</strong>ure ashing (L.T.A.) <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and secondly analyzing <strong>the</strong> inorganic<br />

residue by means <strong>of</strong> x-ray diffractometry. Added inform<strong>at</strong>ion about <strong>the</strong> minral residue<br />

may be <strong>at</strong>tained by utilizing a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with energy<br />

dispersive x-ray analysis (EDX) this procedure helps identify <strong>the</strong> minor minerals as<br />

well as loc<strong>at</strong>e trace elements. An advancement over <strong>the</strong> aforementioned SEM technique<br />

is one utilized by Finkelman (4) in which polished blocks were used so th<strong>at</strong> not only<br />

<strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> minerals were obtained but also <strong>the</strong>ir rel<strong>at</strong>ionship to <strong>the</strong> organic<br />

constituents could be determined.<br />

In recent transmission electron microscopical studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s, (5,6) ultrafine<br />

minerals were observed ((1 um). The observ<strong>at</strong>ion and identity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se submicron<br />

minerals would have been difficult to achieve by use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scanning electron<br />

microscope (SEM). However, <strong>the</strong> scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) with<br />

energy dispersive x-ray analysis is an ideal analytical tool since it is capable <strong>of</strong><br />

supplying elemental and diffraction d<strong>at</strong>a for particles as small as 30 nm in diameter.<br />

In this paper, we present observ<strong>at</strong>ions and analyses <strong>of</strong> mineral m<strong>at</strong>ter in <strong>coal</strong>s<br />

obtained through use <strong>of</strong> electron microscopes.<br />

These d<strong>at</strong>a significantly increase our<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mineral m<strong>at</strong>ter in <strong>coal</strong>s as rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong>ir affects on <strong>coal</strong><br />

combustion.<br />

*Research sponsored by <strong>the</strong> Division <strong>of</strong> Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Energ under contract W-7405-eng-26 with <strong>the</strong> Union Carbide Corpor<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

131


Sample Selection and Prepar<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

The samples used in this study were obtained from several high vol<strong>at</strong>ile<br />

bituminous <strong>coal</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Eastern United St<strong>at</strong>es - Illinois NO. 6, Kentucky NO. 9, Elkhorn<br />

No. 3, and Hazard No. 4. Specimens were prepared for <strong>the</strong> transmission electro<br />

microscope studies from <strong>the</strong> above <strong>coal</strong>s using a technique previously rep0rted.7~)<br />

Optical thin sections approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 10-15 um thick were prepared.<br />

The thin sections<br />

were removed from <strong>the</strong> glass slides using acetone and subsequently munted in an ion<br />

milling machine. Specimens were thinned (ion milled) using Argon gas and a liquid<br />

nitrogen cooled stage to insure against <strong>the</strong>rmal damage to <strong>the</strong> specimen. Additional<br />

specimens consisting <strong>of</strong> polished blocks <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> were prepared for observ<strong>at</strong>ion with<br />

<strong>the</strong> scanning electron microscope.<br />

A high-voltage TEM (MeV), a STEM (120Kv), and a SEM (JEM-U3) were used in this<br />

study. The STEM and SEM were fitted with energy dispersive x-ray analysis systems<br />

uti1 izing Si (Li) solid st<strong>at</strong>e detectors. Microchemical analyses <strong>of</strong> minerals for<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>at</strong>omic number 11 or gre<strong>at</strong>er could be <strong>at</strong>tained for particles as small as<br />

20 nm by using STEM with EOX.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Submicron size minerals have been observed in all <strong>the</strong> high vol<strong>at</strong>ile bituminous<br />

<strong>coal</strong>s th<strong>at</strong> have been studied <strong>at</strong> this labor<strong>at</strong>ory. A represent<strong>at</strong>ive TEM micrograph <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se <strong>coal</strong>s (Fig. 1) reveals th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>se ultra-fine minerals are typically enclosed in<br />

a m<strong>at</strong>rix consisting <strong>of</strong> vitrinite. These minerals are considered as syngenetic in r<br />

orgin; (i.e., contemporaneously deposited in <strong>the</strong> pe<strong>at</strong> basin with <strong>the</strong> organic<br />

constituents). Limited selected area diffraction (SAD) and energy dispersive x-ray<br />

analyses (EDX) <strong>of</strong> several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se minerals, using <strong>the</strong> STEM, showed th<strong>at</strong> kaolinite<br />

(clay) is <strong>the</strong> dominant mineral species. However it must be noted th<strong>at</strong> this analysis<br />

is strictly qualit<strong>at</strong>ive.<br />

Moza et al. (a), in a study <strong>of</strong> minerals in <strong>coal</strong> as rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>coal</strong> combustion<br />

systems, suggested th<strong>at</strong> mineral fragments less than 8 microns would not be expected<br />

to gain enough momentum to collide with he<strong>at</strong> transfer tubes and <strong>the</strong>se minerals would<br />

escape in <strong>the</strong> gas stream. However, from our present study <strong>of</strong> submicron micerals one<br />

can conceive <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se particles fusing toge<strong>the</strong>r to become substantially larger<br />

fragments. For example, a cubic vm <strong>of</strong> vitrinite may contain as much as 300 minerals,<br />

many <strong>of</strong> which actually touch.<br />

Additional ultrafine syngenetic minerals have been observed to be intim<strong>at</strong>ely<br />

mixed with exinite (usually sporinite) and fragments <strong>of</strong> inertinite and vitrinite.<br />

These durain-like bands were probably derived from sediments consisting <strong>of</strong> degraded<br />

organic m<strong>at</strong>erials and mineral detritus deposited toge<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> pe<strong>at</strong> swamp. The<br />

mineral species comprising <strong>the</strong>se deposits are much more varied than those found in<br />

<strong>the</strong> vitrinite. In fact, <strong>the</strong>se minerals usually contain many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> minor and trace<br />

elements associ<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> mineral m<strong>at</strong>ter in <strong>coal</strong> (5) such as tin, nickel, zirconium<br />

titanium, and chromium. Typically, <strong>the</strong>se minerals have a wider range <strong>of</strong> sizes<br />

varying from submicron particles to grains several microns long.<br />

The TEM microstructure presented in Fig. 2 shows sporinite (Sp) segments bounded<br />

by regions consisting <strong>of</strong> granular maceral fragments and minerals (design<strong>at</strong>ed M-M).<br />

An aggreg<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> euhedral pyrite (Pv) crystals loc<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sporinite (SP)<br />

boundaries is not an uncommon fe<strong>at</strong>ure in many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s examined <strong>at</strong> this<br />

labor<strong>at</strong>ory. The size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se pyrite crystals (-1 urn) appears to be identical to <strong>the</strong><br />

132


pyrite crystals in framboids loc<strong>at</strong>ed in vitrinite bands. It is worth noting th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se minerals should prove more easily removed from <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> than those within<br />

maceral s.<br />

In Fig. 3, ano<strong>the</strong>r view <strong>of</strong> mineral m<strong>at</strong>ter in durain-like bands is shown. A<br />

section <strong>of</strong> sporinite (Sp) interfaces with <strong>the</strong> inertinite maceral semifusinite (SF).<br />

The region between <strong>the</strong>se two macerals contains fine granular m<strong>at</strong>erial including<br />

minerals. Additional minerals and organic debris are loc<strong>at</strong>ed within <strong>the</strong> collapsed<br />

sporinite walls (CE). A large quartz grain (-6 pm) is loc<strong>at</strong>ed in a crushed cell in<br />

<strong>the</strong> semifusinite (SF). Usually mineral inclusions within <strong>the</strong> vacant cell cavities <strong>of</strong><br />

inertinite are considered as epigenetic. This point can be rare clearly demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

by viewing an optical micrograph (Fig. 4) th<strong>at</strong> shows epigenetic pyrite (Py) filling<br />

<strong>the</strong> crushed cell cavities in semifusinite (SF).<br />

Common structures found in bituminous <strong>coal</strong>s are inicr<strong>of</strong>ractures and/or joints<br />

th<strong>at</strong> formed perpindicular to <strong>the</strong> bedding plane <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>. These fractures (joints)<br />

are called cle<strong>at</strong> and origin<strong>at</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> after consolid<strong>at</strong>ion due to tectonic<br />

forces acting upon <strong>the</strong> earth's crust. In Fig. 5, a SEM micrograph <strong>of</strong> a polished<br />

block <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>, one can observe <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> cle<strong>at</strong> (CL).<br />

The epigenetic mineral<br />

filling <strong>the</strong> cle<strong>at</strong> (CL) was identified as calcite based upon EDX and x-ray diffraction<br />

analyses, <strong>the</strong> l<strong>at</strong>ter determin<strong>at</strong>ion being performed on segments detached from <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>coal</strong>. The calcite forms a uniform mineral deposit approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 10 pm thick and<br />

entends over several millimeters. A segment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> calcite sheet removed for<br />

analyses exposes one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cle<strong>at</strong> walls (CLW). Typically, minerals in cle<strong>at</strong> can be<br />

readily separ<strong>at</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> organic constituents in <strong>coal</strong>, this is in contrast to <strong>the</strong><br />

pyrite (Py) framboids (Fig. 5) enclosed in <strong>the</strong> vitrinite (V) band which would be<br />

extremely difficult to remove from <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

In addition to <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> calcite in cle<strong>at</strong>, pyrite and kaolinite are also<br />

commonly found in cle<strong>at</strong> (9). The massiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epigenetic mineral deposits in<br />

contrast to <strong>the</strong> syngenetic mineral distribution makes it apparent th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> former<br />

mineral type constitute <strong>the</strong> major fraction <strong>of</strong> minerals in <strong>coal</strong>. The rel<strong>at</strong>ive absence<br />

<strong>of</strong> calcite as a syngenetic mineral and its presence as a dominant cle<strong>at</strong> mineral in<br />

<strong>the</strong>se <strong>coal</strong>s suggests th<strong>at</strong> calcite could readily be removed from <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> by current<br />

benefici<strong>at</strong>ion wthods. Indeed such cleaning <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s would also result in<br />

considerable reduction <strong>of</strong> pyrite and kaolinite. In general, <strong>the</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> calcite<br />

and pyrite should tend to increase <strong>the</strong> ash fusion temper<strong>at</strong>ure and consequently lead<br />

to a reduction in fouling and slagging.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Syngenetic and epigenetic minerals can be observed and identified by electron<br />

microscopy in conjunction with energy dispersive x-ray analysis.<br />

Submicron micerals th<strong>at</strong> are not readily identified or observed by scanning<br />

electron microscopy are easily viewed by use <strong>of</strong> transmission electron<br />

microscopy .<br />

Calcite appears to be rel<strong>at</strong>ively scarce as a syngenetic mineral whereas calcite<br />

is an important epigenetic mineral usually occurring as cle<strong>at</strong> deposits.<br />

Important minor syngenetic mineral assemblages appear to be associ<strong>at</strong>ed with<br />

detritus. These minerals probably contain <strong>the</strong> major portion <strong>of</strong> minor and trace<br />

elements in <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epigenetic minerals should be readily removed from <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

resulting in a probable reduction in fouling and slagging.<br />

133


REFERENCES<br />

1. L. J. Garner, J. <strong>of</strong> rmtitute <strong>of</strong> FueZ, 40, 107 (1967).<br />

2. R. C. Attig and A. F. Duzy, Proceeding <strong>of</strong> Am. Power Conf., 31, 290 (1969).<br />

3. M-Th. Mackowsky, in Coal and Coal-Be<strong>at</strong>ing Str<strong>at</strong>a, (Eds. D. G. Murchison and T.<br />

S. Westall), Elsevier, 309 (1965).<br />

4. R. B. Finkelman and R. W. Stanton, FueZ, 57, 763 (1978).<br />

5.<br />

L. A. Harris and C. S. Yust, Anvances In Chemistry Series 192, (Eds. M. L. Gorb<strong>at</strong>y<br />

and K. Ouchi), Am. Chern. Soc., 321 (1981).<br />

6. L. A. Harris, D. N. Braski, and C. S. Yust, MicrostmcturaZ Science, 5, 351<br />

(1977).<br />

7. L. A. Harris and C. S. Yust, FueZ, 55, 233 (1976).<br />

8. A. K. Moza, D. W. Strickler, and L. G. Austin, Scanning EZectron<br />

Micro~cop~/~98O/IV, 91, (1980).<br />

9. L. A. Harris, 0. B. Cavin, R. S. Crouse, and C. S. Yust, Microscopica Acta, 82,<br />

343 (1980).<br />

By acceptance Of this erlicle. <strong>the</strong><br />

publisher or recipient scknowlsdger<br />

<strong>the</strong> US. Government'r right to<br />

retain e nonexclwive. royslry-free<br />

license in and to any Copyright<br />

covering <strong>the</strong> arzicle.<br />

134


FIG. 1. TEM MICROGRAPH OF A HIGH VOLATILE BITUMINOUS COAL SHOWIN THE DISTRIBUTION<br />

OF SUBMICRON MINERALS (See Arrows) IN VITRINITE (V).<br />

FIG. 2. TEM MICROGRAPH SHOWING THE RELATIONSHIP OF SPORINITE (Sp) WITH MINERAL<br />

BEARING BANDS (M-M). NOTE EUHEORAL PYRITE (Py) CRYSTALS AT SPORINITE (Sp)<br />

BOUNDARY.<br />

I<br />

I 135<br />

t


FIG. 3. TEM MICROGRAPH OF MICROSTRUCTURE CONTAINING SPORINITE (Sp) AND SEMIFUSINITE<br />

(SF). A QUARTZ GRAIN (See Arrow) IS LODGED IN A CELL CAVITY IN THE<br />

SEMIFUSINITE (SF).<br />

FIG. 4. OPTICAL MICROGRAPH SHOWING EPIGENETIC PYRITE (Py) FILLING THE CRUSHED CELL<br />

CAVITIES IN THE SEMIFUSINITE (SF).<br />

136


\<br />

\<br />

FIG. 5. SEM MICROGRAPH SHOWING CALCITE DEPOSIT (See Arrows) IN CLEAT.<br />

FRAMBOIDS ENCLOSED IN VITRINITE (V) ALSO CAN BE SEEN.<br />

137<br />

PYRITE (Py)


THE FATE OF ALKALIS IN COAL COMBUSTION<br />

G.W. Stewart and C.D. Stinespring<br />

Aerodyne Research, Inc., Bedford, MA 01730<br />

and<br />

P. Davidovits<br />

Aerodyne Research, Inc. and Department <strong>of</strong> Chemistry, Boston College<br />

Chestnut Hill, MA 02167<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> combustion, <strong>the</strong> ash particles deposited on various<br />

combustor components can cause serious m<strong>at</strong>erials damage. It has been shown<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkali compounds contained in <strong>the</strong>se particles are among <strong>the</strong> main<br />

causes <strong>of</strong> corrosion. Such corrosion may be especially damaging in proposed<br />

combined cycle power plants where <strong>the</strong> gas turbine blades are exposed to <strong>the</strong><br />

combustor and <strong>the</strong>refore, are in direct contact with particles th<strong>at</strong> escape<br />

filtering. To control <strong>the</strong> corrosive effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkalis, it would be<br />

certainly useful to understand <strong>the</strong> mechanism governing <strong>the</strong> alkali contents <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>es.<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> past few years, a number <strong>of</strong> measurements have been made to<br />

obtain <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> trace elements in ash particles. Several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

studies measured <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ions as a function <strong>of</strong> particle In<br />

some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiments, <strong>the</strong> surface composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger particul<strong>at</strong>es<br />

has also been determined.’-12 From <strong>the</strong>se d<strong>at</strong>a, enrichment factors have been<br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ed for a large number <strong>of</strong> elements.13 A selection from <strong>the</strong> available<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a is displayed in Figures 1 and 2 and Table I.<br />

The composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> smaller particles (a few microns or less) is <strong>of</strong><br />

special interest since particles in this size range are more likely to escape<br />

filtering. It is commonly accepted th<strong>at</strong> enrichment in <strong>the</strong> submicron<br />

particles, as well as on <strong>the</strong> surfaces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger particul<strong>at</strong>es, is due to<br />

condens<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile species from <strong>the</strong> vapor phase. This would lead one to<br />

expect significant enrichment by elements th<strong>at</strong> are <strong>the</strong>mselves vol<strong>at</strong>ile or are<br />

found in <strong>coal</strong> as rel<strong>at</strong>ively vol<strong>at</strong>ile compounds. By and large, <strong>the</strong><br />

measurements are consistent with <strong>the</strong>se expect<strong>at</strong>ions. Thus, for example,<br />

elements such as Pb, Zn, T i, Se, and As which are expected to be vol<strong>at</strong>ile, do<br />

indeed show significant enrichment in <strong>the</strong> smaller particles and, where d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

exist, also on <strong>the</strong> surfaces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger particles. However, an examin<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a shows th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkalis exhibit a surprising departure from this<br />

trend. One would certainly expect <strong>the</strong> alkalis to be among <strong>the</strong> more vol<strong>at</strong>ile<br />

138


\<br />

,<br />

species. In fact, combustion experiments done under labor<strong>at</strong>ory conditions<br />

show significant vaporiz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkalis.14 Yet, <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a ga<strong>the</strong>red from<br />

actual <strong>coal</strong> combustion plants show th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> smaller particles are not enriched<br />

by <strong>the</strong> alkalis. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> surfaces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger particles do<br />

show significant enrichment by <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

The observ<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> small ash particles are not enriched by <strong>the</strong><br />

alkalis suggests th<strong>at</strong>, contrary to expect<strong>at</strong>ions, <strong>the</strong> alkalis are not<br />

vol<strong>at</strong>ilized under actual case combustion conditions. If this is <strong>the</strong> case,<br />

<strong>the</strong> observed surface enrichment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger particles is not due to<br />

condens<strong>at</strong>ion, but must be produced by some o<strong>the</strong>r process, possibly diffusion<br />

from <strong>the</strong> interior to <strong>the</strong> surface.<br />

Experiment Results<br />

Evidence for <strong>the</strong>se suggestions is found in <strong>the</strong> recent work <strong>of</strong> Stinespring<br />

and Stewart15 and Stewart et a1.16 These experiments studied <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> alkalis in model components under various <strong>coal</strong> combustion conditions.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> alkalis are found in <strong>the</strong> organic as well as <strong>the</strong> inorganic components<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>, it is important to understand <strong>the</strong>ir behavior in both types <strong>of</strong> sites.<br />

Illite, which is a potassium containing aluminosilic<strong>at</strong>e mineral, was chosen as<br />

a typical inorganic <strong>coal</strong> component. Sodium and potassium benzo<strong>at</strong>e were chosen<br />

to represent <strong>the</strong> alkali containing organic fraction. These experiments<br />

examined <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> several elements; however, we will focus here only on<br />

<strong>the</strong> results relevant to <strong>the</strong> alkalis. Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) was<br />

used to determine <strong>the</strong> surface composition <strong>of</strong> aluminum silic<strong>at</strong>e minerals which<br />

are he<strong>at</strong>ed in a well controlled environment. Differential <strong>the</strong>rmal analysis<br />

(DTA) and <strong>the</strong>rmogravimetric analysis (TGA) were performed on <strong>the</strong> model organic<br />

compounds to determine <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> alkali release from <strong>the</strong> organic<br />

constituent.<br />

The depth pr<strong>of</strong>iles for potassium indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface concentr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> potassium begins to increase <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures as low as 200°C and it reaches<br />

an enrichment <strong>of</strong> about 13 <strong>at</strong> 1100°C. The depth <strong>of</strong> enrichment is about 100A.<br />

Order-<strong>of</strong>-magnitude calcul<strong>at</strong>ions indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> diffusion may occur on a time<br />

scale comp<strong>at</strong>ible with <strong>the</strong> residence time <strong>of</strong> ash particles in <strong>the</strong> combustor.<br />

From <strong>the</strong>se results we conclude th<strong>at</strong> alkali enrichment on <strong>the</strong> larger ash<br />

particles may indeed result from segreg<strong>at</strong>ion ra<strong>the</strong>r than adsorption or<br />

condens<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

139


The DTA/TGA studies o so im and potassium benzo<strong>at</strong>e decompo . ition show<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>se model molecules initially decompose to form condensed ring organic<br />

molecules, alkali carbon<strong>at</strong>e, and carbon dioxide. This initial decomposition<br />

process occurs over <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure range <strong>of</strong> 400 to 600'C and is independent<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas stream composition. Over this temper<strong>at</strong>ure range, <strong>the</strong>re is no loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> alkali into <strong>the</strong> gas phase. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkali is converted into <strong>the</strong><br />

corresponding alkali carbon<strong>at</strong>e. At higher temper<strong>at</strong>ure, <strong>the</strong> alkali carbon<strong>at</strong>e<br />

decomposes and <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> this decomposition is determined primarily by <strong>the</strong><br />

composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ambient gas. In an inert gas stream, <strong>the</strong> alkali carbon<strong>at</strong>e<br />

decomposes over <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure range <strong>of</strong> 700 to 900°C with release <strong>of</strong> carbon<br />

monoxide and <strong>at</strong>omic alkali. This decomposition has been confirmed by<br />

transpor<strong>at</strong>ion mass spectrometer studies. l7 However, in a stream containing<br />

20% Cop between 700 and 9OO"C, only carbon monoxide is released and <strong>the</strong> alkali<br />

is converted to alkali carbon<strong>at</strong>e. This rection sequence occurs as long as<br />

residual carbon and carbon dioxide are present. Once <strong>the</strong> excess carbon has<br />

been converted to carbon monoxide, <strong>the</strong> alkali carbon<strong>at</strong>e will decompose <strong>at</strong><br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ures in excess <strong>of</strong> 1200°C. Experiments were also performed with a<br />

combin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> SOp, Cop, and O2 in <strong>the</strong> gas stream. Here, it was found th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> alkali carbon<strong>at</strong>e is converted to <strong>the</strong> alkali sulf<strong>at</strong>e with no indic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

alkali loss over <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure range studied (< 1300°K).<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Thus, <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> measurements and experiments discussed above do<br />

provide a plausible way to begin an explan<strong>at</strong>ion for <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> alkali<br />

in che ash particul<strong>at</strong>es. To summarize:<br />

1. Under typical <strong>coal</strong> combustion conditions in an <strong>at</strong>mosphere rich in<br />

Cop and/or SOp, <strong>the</strong> alkalis in <strong>the</strong> organic fraction do not vaporize<br />

but remain bound in <strong>the</strong> ash as stable carbon<strong>at</strong>es or sulf<strong>at</strong>es.<br />

2. The alkalis in <strong>the</strong> inorganic fraction diffuse to <strong>the</strong> surface<br />

producing enrichment by a factor <strong>of</strong> about 13 to a depth <strong>of</strong> about<br />

100A.<br />

The results, however, do not provide conclusive evidence about <strong>the</strong> f<strong>at</strong>e<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkalis. The effect <strong>of</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er vapor in <strong>the</strong> combustion stream has not<br />

yet been studied. Clearly, w<strong>at</strong>er could have an important effect on <strong>the</strong><br />

vaporiz<strong>at</strong>ion process. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> reasoning we have followed to explain<br />

<strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> alkali enrichment in <strong>the</strong> submicron particles requires th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

vol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkalis in both <strong>the</strong> organic and inorganic fraction not<br />

be significant (say less than 20%).<br />

140


1,<br />

It is possible to make a reasonably clear st<strong>at</strong>ement about <strong>the</strong> alkalis in<br />

<strong>the</strong> organic fraction under various combustion conditions. Here, <strong>the</strong><br />

vol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkalis is primarily determined by <strong>the</strong> heterogeneous<br />

chemical reaction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkalis with <strong>the</strong> gas stream. Such detailed<br />

inform<strong>at</strong>ion, however, is not available for <strong>the</strong> alkalis in <strong>the</strong> inorganic<br />

fraction. Here, experimental d<strong>at</strong>a were not obtained under appropri<strong>at</strong>e<br />

conditions. Thus, <strong>the</strong> combustion experiments <strong>of</strong> Hims et al., which do show<br />

significant alkali vaporiz<strong>at</strong>ion, were performed in an O2 <strong>at</strong>mosphere without<br />

CO2 or SO2 enrichment. The experiments <strong>of</strong> Stinespring and Stewart, with <strong>the</strong><br />

inorganically bound alkalis, measured only enrichment and did not study<br />

vaporiz<strong>at</strong>ion. The results <strong>of</strong> recent vaporiz<strong>at</strong>ion studies <strong>of</strong> Hastie et a1.18<br />

were also not performed under conditions directly applicable to <strong>coal</strong><br />

combustion. Clearly, a wider range <strong>of</strong> experimental d<strong>at</strong>a will have to be<br />

obtained. Specifically, <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> surface chemistry on <strong>the</strong> alkali in <strong>the</strong><br />

inorganic fraction will have to be studied before a more conclusive st<strong>at</strong>ement<br />

can be made about <strong>the</strong> f<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alkali in <strong>coal</strong> combustion.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

This work was supported by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy/Morgantown<br />

Energy Technology Center under Contract No. DE-AC21-81NC16244.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

9.<br />

D.F.S. N<strong>at</strong>usch and J.R. Wallace, Science 186, 695 (1974).<br />

R.L. Davison, D.F.S. N<strong>at</strong>usch, J.R. Wallace, and C.A. Evans, Jr.,<br />

Environ. Sci. & Technol. 8, 1107 (1974).<br />

J.M. Ondov, R.C. Ragaini, and A.H. Biermann, Environ. Sci. &<br />

Technol. 2, 947 (1979).<br />

D.G. Coles, R.C. Ragaini, J.M. Ondov, G.L. Fisher, D. Silberman, and<br />

B.A. Prentice, Environ. Sci. & Technol. 13, 455 (1979).<br />

L.E. Wangen, Environ. Sci. & Technol. 15, 1081 (1981).<br />

R.D. Smith, Prog. In Energy & Comb. Sci. 6, 53 (1980).<br />

R.W. Linton, A. Loh, and D.S.F. N<strong>at</strong>usch, Science 191, 852 (1976).<br />

J.A. Campbell, R.D. Smith, and L.E. Davis, Appl. Spectrosc. 32, 316<br />

(1978).<br />

S.J. Ro<strong>the</strong>nberg, P. Denee, and P. Holloway, Appl. Spectrosc. 2, 549<br />

(1980).<br />

141<br />

-<br />

-


10.<br />

11.<br />

12.<br />

13.<br />

14.<br />

15.<br />

16.<br />

17.<br />

18.<br />

R.W. Linton, P. Williams, C.A. Evans, Jr., and D.S.F. N<strong>at</strong>usch,<br />

Anal. Chem. 9, 965 (1977).<br />

L.D. Hulett and A.J. Weinberger, Environ. Sci. & Technol. 5, 965<br />

(1980).<br />

L.D. Hansen, D. Silberman, and G.L. Fisher, Environ. Sci. &<br />

Technol. 15, 1057 (1981).<br />

Enrichment factors are obtained by normalizing to <strong>the</strong> bulk<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large particles (say > 30 um).<br />

C.A. Mims, N. Neville, R.J. Quann, and A.F. Sar<strong>of</strong>im, "Labor<strong>at</strong>ory<br />

Studies <strong>of</strong> Trace Element Transform<strong>at</strong>ion During Coal Combustion,"<br />

Presented <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> 87th AIChE Meeting, August 1979, Boston, Mass.<br />

C.D. Stinespring and G.W. Stewart, Atmos. Environ. 15, 307 (1981).<br />

G.W. Stewart and A. Chakrabarti, High Temper<strong>at</strong>ure-High Pressure (In<br />

press) (1982).<br />

A. Chakrabarti, D.W. Bonnell, G.W. Stewart, and J.W. Hastie, To be<br />

published (1981).<br />

J.W. Hastie, E.R. Plante, and D.W. Bonnell, Interim Report No. NBSIR<br />

81-2279, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, N<strong>at</strong>ional Bureau <strong>of</strong> Standards,<br />

Washington, DC 20234 (1981).<br />

142<br />

I<br />

I


\<br />

i<br />

SURFACE AND BULK ENRICHMENT OF COAL COMBUSTION ASH FOR SELECTED ELEMENTS<br />

ELEMENT<br />

As<br />

Cd<br />

Cr<br />

Pb<br />

Sb<br />

Se<br />

TP,<br />

W<br />

Zn<br />

AI<br />

Ca<br />

CI1<br />

cs<br />

Fe<br />

K<br />

Pfc:<br />

Mn<br />

Na<br />

Rb<br />

Ti<br />

I<br />

*<br />

BULK<br />

ENRI CHbENT<br />

BULK**<br />

**,k<br />

SURFACE<br />

9.4 13.4<br />

--_<br />

___<br />

___<br />

11.5<br />

2.4<br />

3.8<br />

7.9<br />

10.4<br />

__-<br />

7.1<br />

7.8<br />

1.0<br />

1.1<br />

1.1<br />

1.2<br />

1.3<br />

1.1<br />

1.3<br />

1.5<br />

1.5<br />

1.1<br />

1.2<br />

Be 1.6<br />

cu I 2.3<br />

6.2<br />

8.4<br />

---<br />

5.4<br />

4.9<br />

---<br />

6.2<br />

1.6<br />

1.0<br />

1.0<br />

___<br />

1.3<br />

1.3<br />

---<br />

1.7<br />

--_<br />

1.7<br />

1.2<br />

---<br />

2.2<br />

3.3<br />

11.0<br />

1.1<br />

1.6<br />

___<br />

___<br />

0.8<br />

7.6<br />

0.9<br />

6.4<br />

15.2<br />

_--<br />

V I 3.8 2.7 2.0<br />

''Bulk enrichment defined as <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion ina 1U particles<br />

to th<strong>at</strong> in an 18.5~ particle, from D.G. Coles, R.C. Ragaini, J.M. Ondov,<br />

G.L. Fisher, D. Silberman, B.A. Prentice, Environ. Sci. & Tech., 13, 455<br />

(1979).<br />

>k ?<<br />

Bulk enrichment defined as <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion in a 0.15~<br />

particle to th<strong>at</strong> in a 20p particle, from R.D.<br />

& Comb. Sci., 6, 53 (1980).<br />

Smith, Prog. in Energy<br />

**??<br />

Surface enrichment defined as <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface composition divided<br />

by <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>at</strong> 500 8, from R.W. Linton, P. Williams, C.A. Evans, Jr.,<br />

and D.S.F. N<strong>at</strong>usch, Anal. Chem., - 49, 1514 (1977).<br />

143<br />

0.9<br />

6.0


i-<br />

s -<br />

I<br />

9r<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

55<br />

D: z<br />

y 4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1.0 2.4 3.7 6.0 18 I<br />

PARTICLE DIAMETER (10'6fl)<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

PARTICLE DIAMETER (10%<br />

Flgurs 2. Lilrlclmesr vs. Yorflclr Size. Baaed on D<strong>at</strong>a by BmLt11.<br />

Pmg. Energy and Comb. scl.. a. SI (1980).<br />

144


I<br />

Coal Ash Sintering Model and <strong>the</strong> R<strong>at</strong>e Measurements<br />

E. Raask<br />

Central Electricity Research Labor<strong>at</strong>ories<br />

Kelvin Avenue<br />

Lea<strong>the</strong>rhead, Surrey, UK<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> innumerable labor<strong>at</strong>ory investig<strong>at</strong>ions and <strong>the</strong> wealth <strong>of</strong> practical<br />

experience, <strong>the</strong>re remains some enigm<strong>at</strong>ic facets in <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> sintered ash and<br />

slag deposit on he<strong>at</strong> exchange surfaces in <strong>coal</strong>-fired boilers. Th<strong>at</strong> is, occurrences<br />

<strong>of</strong> massive build-up <strong>of</strong> ash deposits can take boiler design and oper<strong>at</strong>ion engineers<br />

by surprise. This would suggest th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> engineers are receiving incomplete or<br />

incorrect inform<strong>at</strong>ion on <strong>the</strong> deposit-forming propensity <strong>of</strong> ash in different <strong>coal</strong>s.<br />

Traditional methods <strong>of</strong> assessing <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> deposit-forming impurities in<br />

high temper<strong>at</strong>ure boiler plants are based on ash fusion tests as described in different<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ional standards for <strong>coal</strong> analysis and testing, e.g., ASTM (1968), British Standard<br />

(1970), DIN (1976) and Norme Francaise (1945). These ash fusion tests have been<br />

developed from refractory m<strong>at</strong>erial technology, and are based on observ<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

change in shape and size <strong>of</strong> an ash sample on he<strong>at</strong>ing. It has been realized th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

results <strong>of</strong> ash fusion tests are frequently imprecise, and can lead to a mistaken<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> likely severity <strong>of</strong> boiler fouling and slagging.<br />

There has been a number <strong>of</strong> suggestions made for ash fouling and slagging indices<br />

to predict more accur<strong>at</strong>ely <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> deposit build-up with different <strong>coal</strong>s as<br />

reviewed by Winegartner (1974). The empirical formulae, e.g., silica r<strong>at</strong>io, basic<br />

to acidic oxide r<strong>at</strong>io, and sodium and sulphur contents <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>, are based on <strong>the</strong><br />

chemical analysis and have a limit<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y apply to particular <strong>coal</strong>s. Th<strong>at</strong> is,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is no universal formula <strong>of</strong> predicting <strong>the</strong> severity <strong>of</strong> boiler fouling based on<br />

ash fusion tests and chemical analysis with all types <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

It is <strong>the</strong>refore evident th<strong>at</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r research is necessary on <strong>the</strong> mechanism <strong>of</strong><br />

ash particle-to-particle bonding <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ures. This work sets out to redefine<br />

an ash sintering model in terms <strong>of</strong> measurable parameters, surface tension, viscosity,<br />

electrical conductance, temper<strong>at</strong>ure, particle size and time.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> experimental work,<br />

novel methods <strong>of</strong> measuring <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> ash sintering were applied, in order to test<br />

<strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sintering model.<br />

SINTERING MODEL<br />

Frenkel (1945) has derived an equ<strong>at</strong>ion rel<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interface between<br />

two spherical particles:<br />

where x is <strong>the</strong> radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interface, r is <strong>the</strong> original radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spheres, Y is<br />

<strong>the</strong> surface tension and t is <strong>the</strong> time. Rearranging <strong>the</strong> equ<strong>at</strong>ion in terms <strong>of</strong> x/r and t,<br />

it becomes:<br />

and it is applicable when < 0.3.<br />

145


Sintering by viscous flow is <strong>the</strong> principal mechanism for <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> deposits<br />

in <strong>coal</strong> fired boile s and t e r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sintering <strong>of</strong> different size particles for a<br />

given viscosity (10 6 N s m- 9 ) can be seen in Fig. 1 where <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> x/r is plotted<br />

against time on a logarithmic scale. The surface tension <strong>of</strong> fused ash was taken to<br />

be 0.32 N rn-l as measured previously by Raask (1966). Fig. 2 shows plots where <strong>the</strong><br />

r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> x/r represents <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> sintering <strong>of</strong> 5 vm radius particles having different<br />

viscosities. Table 1 lists four arbitrary stages <strong>of</strong> sintering <strong>of</strong> ash deposit on boiler<br />

tubes from <strong>the</strong> initial contact between <strong>the</strong> ash particles to <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> fused slag<br />

where <strong>the</strong> shapes <strong>of</strong> initial constituent particles are no longer distinguishable.<br />

Table 1. Degree <strong>of</strong> Sintering Based on <strong>the</strong> R<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> Neck Bond<br />

Radius to Particle Radius (+)<br />

R<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> x/r Degress <strong>of</strong> Sintering Comment<br />

0.001 Onset <strong>of</strong> sintering Deposit <strong>of</strong> this degree <strong>of</strong> sintering on<br />

boiler tubes would not have significant<br />

cohesive strength and would probably fall<br />

<strong>of</strong>f under <strong>the</strong> action <strong>of</strong> gravity and boiler<br />

vi br<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

Al.3<br />

Slightly sintered The deposit on boiler tubes would probably<br />

m<strong>at</strong>rix be removed by soot blowing.<br />

Strongly sintered The deposit on boiler tubes would be<br />

deposit difficult to remove by soot blowing.<br />

Slagging The ash particles lose <strong>the</strong>ir original<br />

identity and <strong>the</strong> deposit on boiler tubes<br />

cannot be removed by soot blowing.<br />

Rapid form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> sintered boiler deposits and slags is usually explained by <strong>the</strong><br />

presence <strong>of</strong> a liquid phase or molten surface layer on ash particles. In high temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

glass and slag technology (blas furnace slag), a liquid phase is considered to have a<br />

viscosity value below 10 N s m- 5 . The plots in Fig. 1 and 2 show th<strong>at</strong> with small particles<br />

it is not necessary to evoke <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a liquid phase for a rapid sintering. For<br />

example, particles 0.1 m in diameter would require about 10 m i l l i econds o form a<br />

substantial sinter bond, when <strong>the</strong> viscosity has a high value <strong>of</strong> 10 3 N s m-'. With <strong>the</strong><br />

same viscosity 10 pm particles would require about 10 seconds to achieve <strong>the</strong> same degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> bonding.<br />

The two parameters which govern <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sintering, namely <strong>the</strong> surface tension<br />

and <strong>the</strong> viscosity, both decrease with temper<strong>at</strong>ure as shown in Fig. 3. The temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> surface tension is small (Curve A) and it is approxim<strong>at</strong>ely proportional<br />

to <strong>the</strong> inverse <strong>of</strong> square root <strong>of</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure as discussed by Boni and Derge (1956)<br />

whereas <strong>the</strong> viscosity changes exponentially with temper<strong>at</strong>ure as shown by Curve B.<br />

is <strong>the</strong>refore evident th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sintering will show an inverse rel<strong>at</strong>ionship with<br />

<strong>the</strong> viscosity and w i l l increase exponentially with temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

PARTICLE-TO-PARTICLE NECK GROWTH MEASUREMENTS<br />

The model for <strong>coal</strong> ash sintering discussed in <strong>the</strong> previous section is based on <strong>the</strong><br />

viscous deform<strong>at</strong>ion and flow <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> contact points between spherical particles. It<br />

would, <strong>the</strong>refore, be logical to consider determining <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sintering by a technique<br />

where <strong>the</strong> measurements are based directly on Frenkel 's equ<strong>at</strong>ion. Kuczynski (1949) has<br />

146<br />

It<br />

I


5<br />

carried out such sintering measurements by placing spherical particles on <strong>the</strong> surface<br />

Of a glass slab <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same composition. Raask (1973) has reported some results <strong>of</strong><br />

sintering r<strong>at</strong>e measurements with <strong>coal</strong> ash slag particles based on a similar technique.<br />

The method requires spherical particles <strong>of</strong> ash and <strong>the</strong>se can he prepared by passing<br />

ground <strong>coal</strong> minerals or slag through a vertical furnace as described by Raask (1969).<br />

Subsequently <strong>the</strong> particles were placed in a narrow groove on a pl<strong>at</strong>inum foil as shown<br />

’ in Fig. 4a. The particles were <strong>the</strong>n introduced into a prehe<strong>at</strong>ed furnace and kept <strong>at</strong><br />

;<br />

~<br />

a constant temper<strong>at</strong>ure in air, or in a gas mixture for a period <strong>of</strong> five minutes to<br />

several hours. The radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sinter neck between <strong>the</strong> particles (Fig. 4b) was<br />

measured microscopically <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> ambient temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

Fig. 5 shows <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> neck growth between spherical particles <strong>of</strong> slag, 60 urn<br />

in radius, when he<strong>at</strong>ed in air. The spherical particles were prepared from boiler slag<br />

<strong>of</strong> a typical British bituminous <strong>coal</strong> ash which has caused some boiler fouling. The time<br />

for a firm degree <strong>of</strong> sintering, (x/r = 0.1, Table 1) was 135 seconds and 70 seconds <strong>at</strong><br />

1375 K and 1425 K, respectively.<br />

From <strong>the</strong>se measurements <strong>the</strong> time required for a given<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> sintering can be calcul<strong>at</strong>ed for <strong>the</strong> ash particles <strong>of</strong> different sizes. For<br />

example, <strong>the</strong> ash deposited on boiler tubes in pulverized <strong>coal</strong> fired boilers contains<br />

a larger number <strong>of</strong> particles <strong>of</strong> 0.5 to 1.0 ,m in diameter, and <strong>the</strong>se particles require<br />

only a few seconds to form a strongly sintered deposit in <strong>the</strong> same temper<strong>at</strong>ure range.<br />

MEASUREMENTS OF ASH SINTERING RATES BY SIMULTANEOUS DILATOMETRIC<br />

AND ELECTRICAL CONDUCTANCE TECHNIQUES<br />

Particle-to-particle sinter bonding usually results in a shrinkage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> external<br />

dimensions <strong>of</strong> a powder compact, and <strong>the</strong> dil<strong>at</strong>ometric shrinkage measurements have been<br />

extensively used to determine <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sintering <strong>of</strong> glass and refractory m<strong>at</strong>erials.<br />

Smith (1956) has used a dil<strong>at</strong>ometric shrinkage technique to study <strong>the</strong> sintering<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> pulverized fuel ash and an intercept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shrinkage curve on <strong>the</strong><br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure axis was taken to define <strong>the</strong> sinter point. The measurements can give useful<br />

inform<strong>at</strong>ion and <strong>the</strong> results can he rel<strong>at</strong>ed to different degrees <strong>of</strong> sintering as outlined<br />

in Table 1. With some <strong>coal</strong> ashes, however, anomalous results can be obtained where <strong>the</strong><br />

shrinkage measurements show no change although a significant degree <strong>of</strong> sintering has<br />

taken place. This devi<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> sintering behaviour from <strong>the</strong> Frenkel model makes it<br />

necessary to monitor ano<strong>the</strong>r parameter which rel<strong>at</strong>es to <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>e ash<br />

<strong>coal</strong>escence.<br />

Viscosity measurement by <strong>the</strong> rod penetr<strong>at</strong>ion method has been applied by Boow (1972),<br />

Raask (1973) and Gibb (1981) to assess <strong>the</strong> sintering characteristics <strong>of</strong> different <strong>coal</strong><br />

ashes. However, <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> initial sintering cannot be measured by this technique, and<br />

Raask (1979) <strong>the</strong>refore considered <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a method <strong>of</strong> electrical conductance measure-<br />

ments for monitoring <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sintering <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> ashes.<br />

Previously Ramanan and<br />

Chaklader (1975) had used <strong>the</strong> same technique to study sintering <strong>of</strong> glass sphere and<br />

nickel powder compacts.<br />

The essential premise <strong>of</strong> this method is th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>es are <strong>of</strong> an electrically<br />

conductive m<strong>at</strong>erial, e.g., nickel, or th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> glassy and ceramic m<strong>at</strong>erials contain some<br />

c<strong>at</strong>ions, e.g., alkali-metals which constitute an ionic conductance p<strong>at</strong>h when an<br />

electrical potential is applied. The method is, <strong>the</strong>refore, not applicable to measure<br />

<strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sintering <strong>of</strong> nonconductive powders, e.g., alumina. This is not a limit<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

with <strong>coal</strong> ashes as all ashes contain sufficient amounts <strong>of</strong> c<strong>at</strong>ionic species; 0.1 per cent<br />

by weight quantity <strong>of</strong> sodium, potassium or calcium is likely to be adequ<strong>at</strong>e for <strong>the</strong><br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> providing a conductance p<strong>at</strong>h.<br />

A powder compact before sintering has a low conductance because <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> particleto-particle<br />

contacts. As <strong>the</strong> cross-sectional area <strong>of</strong> sinter bonds grows on he<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong><br />

conductance is increased according to <strong>the</strong> equ<strong>at</strong>ion:<br />

147


where A is <strong>the</strong> conductance, D and D are <strong>the</strong> densities <strong>of</strong> sample before and after<br />

sintering, E is <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>of</strong>Oactiv<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> sintering, R is <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmodynamic (gas)<br />

constant, T is <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure and A is a constant. When <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> sintering does<br />

not change, e.g., on cooling after <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> particle <strong>coal</strong>escence has reached <strong>the</strong><br />

stage <strong>of</strong> density D, <strong>the</strong> equ<strong>at</strong>ion (3) reduces to:<br />

E<br />

A = A exp (l)<br />

1 RT<br />

(4)<br />

Rask (1975) has described a furnace assembly sketched in Fig. 6 for simultaneous<br />

measurements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electrical conductance and <strong>the</strong> dil<strong>at</strong>ometric shrinkage measurements.<br />

Fig. 7a shows <strong>the</strong> furnace in its down position for exposure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> saniple well; sample<br />

crucible and three pellets <strong>of</strong> sintered ash from previous runs are shown <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> well.<br />

Fig. 7b s ows <strong>the</strong> furnace in <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion position. The he<strong>at</strong>ing r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 0.1 K s<br />

(6 K min-?) was <strong>the</strong> same as th<strong>at</strong> used in <strong>the</strong> ASTM (1968) ash fusion tests and <strong>the</strong> sinter<br />

tests can be carried in air or in simul<strong>at</strong>ed flue gas.<br />

Care is needed to stop he<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

when <strong>the</strong> ash sample has decreased 30 per cent in height to avoid slagging; once slag<br />

is formed it is difficult to remove <strong>the</strong> frozen m<strong>at</strong>erial from <strong>the</strong> crucible.<br />

Initial experiments were made with a soda glass, ground below 100 pm in particle<br />

size, <strong>of</strong> known viscosity/temper<strong>at</strong>ure characteristics published by Napolitano and Hawkins<br />

(1974). This was done to establish <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> simultaneous dil<strong>at</strong>ometric and<br />

conductance measurements for determining <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sintering <strong>of</strong> powder compacts. The<br />

results are shown in Fig. 8 where Line A depicts <strong>the</strong>rmal expansion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alumina<br />

support tubes and <strong>the</strong> sample, and Curve A shows <strong>the</strong> linear shrinkage <strong>of</strong> 10 mm high<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> powdered glass. The intercept <strong>of</strong> Curve A on <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure axis, 875 K can<br />

be defined as <strong>the</strong> sinterpoint temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

The conductance plot (Curve B gives <strong>the</strong> same sinterpoint temper<strong>at</strong>ure and <strong>the</strong><br />

results increase exponentially with temper<strong>at</strong>ure. On cooling Curve C shows a large<br />

hysteresis effect, th<strong>at</strong> is, <strong>the</strong>se are significantly higher than <strong>the</strong> corresponding results<br />

on he<strong>at</strong>ing. On rehe<strong>at</strong>ing, however, <strong>the</strong> conductance measurements fit closely to Curve C.<br />

This behavior is in accord with <strong>the</strong> sintering model and <strong>the</strong> measurements on first he<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

when sinter bonds are formed, fit equ<strong>at</strong>ion (3). Since on subsequent cooling and rehe<strong>at</strong>ing,<br />

<strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> particle <strong>coal</strong>escence is "frozen," <strong>the</strong> conductance change is governed by<br />

<strong>the</strong> exponential temper<strong>at</strong>ure as defined by equ<strong>at</strong>ion (4).<br />

Fig. 9 shows th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re was in inverse rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between <strong>the</strong> viscosity and <strong>the</strong><br />

electrical conductance with respect to teniper<strong>at</strong>ure. The conductance is dependent on <strong>the</strong><br />

mobility, i.e., on <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> diffusion <strong>of</strong> sodium and calcium ions in <strong>the</strong> glass m<strong>at</strong>rix,<br />

and thus an inverse rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between viscosity and self-diffusion is established<br />

as stipul<strong>at</strong>ed by Frenkel's sintering model. The esults f condu tance measurements<br />

plotted in Fig. 9 cover <strong>the</strong> viscosity range <strong>of</strong> 10 6 to 10l8 N s m-5, and it has been<br />

suggested previously by Raask (1973) th<strong>at</strong> this is a relevant viscosity range for <strong>the</strong><br />

form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> sintered deposits in <strong>coal</strong> fired boilers.<br />

Th<strong>at</strong> is, strong sinter bonds<br />

can form in this viscosity range within a few minutes or several days depending on <strong>the</strong><br />

particle size (Figs. 1 and 2).<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> British and US bituminous <strong>coal</strong> ashes have also been investig<strong>at</strong>ed for<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir sintering characteristics by <strong>the</strong> siniul taneous shrinkage and conductance measure-<br />

ments. Fig. 10 shows typical shrinkage curve and <strong>the</strong> conductance plots on he<strong>at</strong>ing and<br />

on cooling which were obtained with an Illinois <strong>coal</strong> ash. It was evident th<strong>at</strong> with<br />

,


I<br />

this ash and o<strong>the</strong>r bituminous <strong>coal</strong> ashes tested, sintering proceeded according to<br />

equ<strong>at</strong>ion (3). The conductance d<strong>at</strong>a can be examined in more detail on <strong>the</strong> log n against<br />

1/T plot as depicted on Fig. 11. The conductance plot on he<strong>at</strong>ing is nonlinear as<br />

expected from equ<strong>at</strong>ion (3), whereas on cooling <strong>the</strong> plot was linear in accord with<br />

equ<strong>at</strong>ion (4).<br />

The conductance plot on he<strong>at</strong>ing can be divided into three sections where <strong>the</strong><br />

logarithmic conductance values in S (micro-Siemen) are as follows: 1 to 10, 10 to 100<br />

and 100 to 1000 units. Fig. 12 shows schem<strong>at</strong>ically <strong>the</strong> conductance p<strong>at</strong>h and shrinkage<br />

in three different degrees <strong>of</strong> sintering. The strength <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sintered pellet to<br />

crushing was determined <strong>at</strong> room temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sinter run.<br />

present<strong>at</strong>ion shows th<strong>at</strong> an increase <strong>of</strong> 155 K from <strong>the</strong> initial sinter point temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

Of 1125 K to 1180 K resulted in a high degree <strong>of</strong> sintering where <strong>the</strong> conductance<br />

readings were above 100 pS.<br />

There are some <strong>coal</strong> ashes which exhibit in <strong>the</strong>ir sintering behavior a remarkable<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> divergence from <strong>the</strong> particle <strong>coal</strong>escence model as defined by equ<strong>at</strong>ion (3).<br />

Fig. 13 shows th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> nonbituminous <strong>coal</strong> ash, Leigh Creek, Australia, commenced to<br />

sinter <strong>at</strong> 1100 K according to <strong>the</strong> conductance measurements (Curve B). There was,<br />

however, no shrinkage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ash pellet before temper<strong>at</strong>ure reached 1350 K (Curve A).<br />

Th<strong>at</strong> is, <strong>the</strong>re was a gap <strong>of</strong> 250 K between <strong>the</strong> ash sinterpoint temper<strong>at</strong>ure indic<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> conductance measurements and th<strong>at</strong> deduced from <strong>the</strong> shrinkage measurements. The<br />

reason for this nonconformist behavior must be th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re was a significant degree <strong>of</strong><br />

particle-to-particle bonding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> infusible m<strong>at</strong>erial, e.g., quartz by a low viscosity<br />

phase <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> 1100 to 1350 K. This may be an explan<strong>at</strong>ion for severe boiler<br />

fouling with high sodium <strong>coal</strong> ashes as discussed by Boow (1972) which is inconsistent<br />

with <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> conventional ash fusion tests. Leigh Creek ash had ano<strong>the</strong>r unusual<br />

sintering fe<strong>at</strong>ure; after an initial rise in conductance with temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>the</strong>re was a<br />

decrease with an inflection point <strong>at</strong> 1325 K (Fig. 12). This was probably because <strong>the</strong><br />

high amount <strong>of</strong> sodium in ash, 6.3 per cent <strong>of</strong> Na 0 by weight, resulted in crystalliz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> sodium alumino-silic<strong>at</strong>e or alumin<strong>at</strong>e in <strong>the</strong> tgmper<strong>at</strong>ure range <strong>of</strong> 1275 and 1325 K<br />

thus reducing <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> sodium ion in <strong>the</strong> glassy m<strong>at</strong>rix.<br />

Labor<strong>at</strong>ory prepared ashes can be c<strong>at</strong>egorized according to <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong><br />

simultaneous measurements <strong>of</strong> shrinkage and <strong>the</strong> electrical conductance on sintering<br />

<strong>of</strong> an ash compact. The majority <strong>of</strong> ash compact <strong>coal</strong>esce and shrink according to <strong>the</strong><br />

model as defined by equ<strong>at</strong>ion (3) and particle-to-particle bonding is accompanied by<br />

<strong>the</strong> external shrinkage and a change in shape <strong>of</strong> an ash sample in early stages <strong>of</strong><br />

sintering. With <strong>the</strong>se ashes <strong>the</strong> conventional ash fusion tests, e.g., ASTM-Method (1968)<br />

usually give meaningful results. There are, however, some <strong>coal</strong> ashes rich in sodium<br />

which can give anomalous results when sinter tested as exemplified by <strong>the</strong> conductance<br />

and shrinkage curves in Fig. 12. Th<strong>at</strong> is, <strong>the</strong>re can be a high degree <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> internal<br />

particle-to-particle adhesion resulting in <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> ash compact or deposit <strong>of</strong><br />

high strength without <strong>the</strong> corresponding external shrinkage and <strong>the</strong>se ashes should be<br />

tested by <strong>the</strong> electrical conductance technique to give meaningful results in <strong>the</strong> early<br />

stages <strong>of</strong> sintering.<br />

NEE0 FOR AUGMENTING CONVENTIONAL ASH FUSION TESTS BY SINTERING RATE MEASUREMENTS<br />

Ash fusion tests are based on <strong>the</strong> external change in shape, deform<strong>at</strong>ion, shrinkage,<br />

and flow <strong>of</strong> a pyramidic or cylindrical pellet <strong>of</strong> ash when he<strong>at</strong>ed in a labor<strong>at</strong>ory<br />

furnace. A pyramidic shape is <strong>of</strong>ten used because it is easier to observe rounding <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> pointed tip <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specimen than th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> a cylindrical pellet. The<br />

methods are empirical, and strict observance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> test conditions is necessary to<br />

obtain reproducible results and <strong>the</strong>se are laid down in <strong>the</strong> US ASTM (1968), British<br />

Standard (1970), German (DIN 1976) and French (Norme Francaise, 1945) procedures.<br />

149<br />

The


It has been recognized by many researchers th<strong>at</strong> although ash fusion tests can<br />

given useful inform<strong>at</strong>ion regarding <strong>the</strong> fouling and slagging propensities <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> ashes,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are serious shortcomings. First, <strong>the</strong> tests are based on subjective observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

and not precise scientific measurements, and <strong>the</strong>y have a large margin <strong>of</strong> error. For<br />

example, <strong>the</strong> ASTM-method which is widely used in many countries allows for a 55 K<br />

margin <strong>of</strong> reproducibility in <strong>the</strong> initial deform<strong>at</strong>ion, s<strong>of</strong>tening hemisphere temper<strong>at</strong>ures<br />

in an oxidizing <strong>at</strong>mosphere, and a 70 K margin <strong>of</strong> uncertainty in determining <strong>the</strong> initial<br />

deform<strong>at</strong>ion temper<strong>at</strong>ure in a reducing <strong>at</strong>mosphere.<br />

Within th<strong>at</strong> 70 K margin <strong>the</strong> viscosity<br />

can change by an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude and consequently <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> ash sintering will<br />

change by <strong>the</strong> same factor.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r, more serious, shortcoming with <strong>the</strong> ash fusion method is th<strong>at</strong> when testing<br />

some <strong>coal</strong> ashes <strong>the</strong>re occurs an extensive degree <strong>of</strong> particle-to-particle bonding without<br />

any visible sign <strong>of</strong> deform<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> an ash pellet. It is, <strong>the</strong>refore, evident<br />

th<strong>at</strong> an additional method is needed to assess <strong>the</strong> sintering characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

ashes. A choice <strong>of</strong> sinter measuring techniques is given in Table 2.<br />

TABLE 2. REVIEW OF ASH SINTERING TECHNIQUES<br />

Measuring Technique Equipment<br />

Neck-growth measurements between A furnace and a<br />

spherical particles (Kuczynski, microscope<br />

1949), Raask, 1973)<br />

Simultaneous shrinkage and<br />

electrical conductance<br />

measurements (Raask, 1979)<br />

Needs a purpose-built<br />

furnace assembly for<br />

more accur<strong>at</strong>e measure-<br />

ments. A simpler<br />

version uses pl<strong>at</strong>inum<br />

wire electrodes as<br />

described by Raask<br />

(1979) and by Cumming<br />

(1980)<br />

Crushing strength measure-<br />

A furnace and a<br />

ments <strong>of</strong> sintered ash<br />

crushing strength<br />

pellets (Atting and<br />

Barnhard, 1963; Gibb, 1981)<br />

measuring device<br />

Ash agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion by<br />

sieving test (Stallman<br />

and Neavel (1980)<br />

Ash plug flow method<br />

A furnace and a<br />

sieving machine<br />

A tubular furnace tube<br />

with perfor<strong>at</strong>ed pl<strong>at</strong>e<br />

to support an ash plug<br />

Comments<br />

~<br />

This is suitable for<br />

homogeneous m<strong>at</strong>erial when<br />

available in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong><br />

spherical particles. It is<br />

not suitable for routine<br />

sinter testing <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> ashes.<br />

Each ash could be provided with<br />

sintering r<strong>at</strong>e curves. The<br />

method needs to be tested and<br />

assessed by different<br />

researchers,<br />

The method has been used by<br />

several researchers but <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is no agreed procedure<br />

This is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> simplest<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> testing for<br />

initial sintering, and it<br />

warrants more system<strong>at</strong>ic<br />

tests<br />

So far no experimental results<br />

have been found in<br />

1 i ter<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

The brief review in Table 2 shows th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are several labor<strong>at</strong>ory methods <strong>of</strong><br />

sinter testing <strong>coal</strong> ashes, which can give some useful inform<strong>at</strong>ion regarding <strong>the</strong>ir deposit<br />

150


forming propensity. However, none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se techniques could be written as recommended<br />

methods, and a coordin<strong>at</strong>ed test program involving specialist researchers in different<br />

labor<strong>at</strong>ories would be required to assess <strong>the</strong>ir general applicability.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

1. Frenkel's sintering model is a useful introduction to understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

mechanism <strong>of</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> boiler deposits in <strong>the</strong> crucial early stages <strong>of</strong> particle-to-particle<br />

bonding. The model sets out unequivocally <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e controlling parameters in sintering,<br />

namely surface tension (<strong>the</strong> driving force for particle <strong>coal</strong>escence) viscosity (<strong>the</strong><br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure sensitive parameter) and particle size.<br />

2. Measurements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> neck-growth between <strong>the</strong> spherical particles<br />

demonstr<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sintering model, but <strong>the</strong> technique is not suitable for<br />

routine assessment tests <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sintering characteristics <strong>of</strong> different <strong>coal</strong> ashes.<br />

3. A method <strong>of</strong> simultaneous measurements <strong>of</strong> dil<strong>at</strong>ometric shrinkage and electrical<br />

conductance has been developed for assessing <strong>the</strong> deposit forming propensity <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

ashes. The measurements are based on a sintering model which stipul<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> particle-to-particle bonding leads to enhanced conductance and increased density <strong>of</strong><br />

ash test samples and boiler deposits.<br />

4. There are some <strong>coal</strong> ashes, rich in sodium which do not behave as predicted<br />

from sintering models. With <strong>the</strong>se ashes <strong>the</strong> sinterpoint temper<strong>at</strong>ure defined by <strong>the</strong><br />

electrical conductance measurements can be over 250 K lower than th<strong>at</strong> indic<strong>at</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong><br />

results <strong>of</strong> conventional ash fusion tests.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

The work was carried out <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> Central Electricity Research Labor<strong>at</strong>ories and <strong>the</strong><br />

paper is published by permission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Central Electricity Gener<strong>at</strong>ing Board.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ASTM, Fusibility <strong>of</strong> Coal and Coke Ash, D1857-68 (1968).<br />

R. C. Attig and D. H. Barnhardt, "A Labor<strong>at</strong>ory Method <strong>of</strong> Evalu<strong>at</strong>ing Factors Affecting<br />

Tube Bank Fouling in Coal-Fired Boilers," Proceed. Int. Conf., Mechanism <strong>of</strong> Corrosion<br />

by Fuel Impurities, Marchwood, England, 1968, Butterworths Publ. p. 183.<br />

R. E. Boni and G. Derge, "Surface Structure <strong>of</strong> Non-Oxidizing Slags Containing Sulphur,"<br />

Trans. AIME, Journ. Metals, p. 59 (1956).<br />

J. Boow, "Sodium and Ash Reactions in <strong>the</strong> Form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Fireside Deposits in Pulverized<br />

Fuel Fired Boilers," Fuel, 51, 170 (1972).<br />

British Standard, "The Analysis and Testing <strong>of</strong> Coal and Coke, BS Method 1016, Part 15 -<br />

Fusibility <strong>of</strong> Coal and Coke Ash," Brit. Stand. Inst., London (1970).<br />

J. w. Cumming: "Communic<strong>at</strong>ion: The Electrical Resistance <strong>of</strong> Coal Ash <strong>at</strong> Elev<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

Temper<strong>at</strong>ures, Journ. Inst. Energy, 53, 153 (1980).<br />

DIN, "Determin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Ash Fusion Behavior," German Standard, DIN 51730 (1976).<br />

J. J. Frenkel, "Viscous Flow <strong>of</strong> Crystalline Bodies Under <strong>the</strong> Action <strong>of</strong> Surface Tension,"<br />

Journ. Phys. (MOSCOW) 2, 385 (1945).<br />

151


9.<br />

10.<br />

11.<br />

12.<br />

13.<br />

14.<br />

15.<br />

16.<br />

17.<br />

18.<br />

19.<br />

W. H. Gibb, "The Slagging and Fouling Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Coals - 1. Ash Viscosity<br />

Measurements for <strong>the</strong> Determin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Slagging Propensity," Power Ind. Research,<br />

- 1, 29 (1981).<br />

G. C. Kuczynski, "Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sintering <strong>of</strong> Glass," Journ. Appl. Phys. 0, 1160 (1949).<br />

A. Napolitano and G. E. Hawkins, "Viscosity <strong>of</strong> a Standard Soda-Lime-Silica Glass,"<br />

Journ. Res. US N<strong>at</strong>. Bur. Stan. Sec. A., 68, 439 (1964).<br />

F. Norme, "Determin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Ash Fusibility Curves," NF M03-012 (1945).<br />

E. Raask, " Slag/Coal Interface Phenomena, "Trans. ASME for Power, Jan. p. 40, (1965a).<br />

E. Raask, "Fusion <strong>of</strong> Silic<strong>at</strong>e Particles in Coal Flames," Fuel, 9, 366 (1969).<br />

E. Raask, "Boiler Fouling - The Mechanism <strong>of</strong> Slagging and Preventive Measures,"<br />

VGB Kraftwerkstechnik, 53, 248 (1973).<br />

E. Raask, "Sintering Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Coal Ashes by Simultaneous Dil<strong>at</strong>ometry -<br />

Electrical Conductance Measurements," Journ. Therm. Anal., 16, 91 (1979).<br />

T. Ramanan and A.C.D. Chaklader, "Electrical Resistivity <strong>of</strong> Hot-Pressed Compacts,"<br />

Journ. Am. Ceram. SOC., 9, 476 (1975).<br />

E. J. D. Smith, "The Sintering <strong>of</strong> Fly Ash," Journ. Inst. Fuel, 9, 1 (1956).<br />

J. J. Stallman and R. C. Neavel, "Technique to Measure <strong>the</strong> Temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> Agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Coal Ash," Fuel, 59, 584 (1980).<br />

-5 0 3<br />

LOGlo TIME I<br />

__ FIG. I LOG-LOG PLOT OF DEGREE OF SINTERING (x'fl AGAINST<br />

TIME VISCOSITY - 108N sm-'<br />

PARTICLE RADIUS. A - 0.05 pm 0 - 0.5 pm<br />

C-S.Dpm D-5OUm<br />

152


t<br />

I<br />

153


ccnnit EiEcinicin RESEARCH LABORATORIES<br />

n<br />

W<br />

x<br />

a m<br />

E<br />

W I-<br />

5<br />

u)<br />

9 -<br />

LI)<br />

4<br />

ul -I<br />

I<br />

ul 4<br />

-I<br />

4<br />

0 0<br />

L 0<br />

v)<br />

W -I<br />

0<br />

L<br />

PLEASE RETURN THIS ORIGINAL TO DRAWING OFFICE<br />

154<br />

REF. RO/L/


CENTRAL ELECTRICIN RESEARCH LABORATORIES REI. RD/L/<br />

(a) DOWN POSITION FOR SAMPLE CHANGE<br />

(b) OPERATION POSITION<br />

FIG. 7 FURNACE ASSEMBLY FOR THE ASH SINTERING MEASUREMENTS<br />

PLEASE RETURN THIS ORIGINAL TO DRAWING OFFICE<br />

155


Y<br />

156<br />

10<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Y


157<br />

18 I<br />

I<br />

a<br />

I


THE CAPTURE AND RETENTION OF SULFUR SPECIES BY<br />

CALCIUM COMPOUNDS DURING THE COMBUSTION OF PULVERIZED COAL<br />

P. L. Case, M. P. Heap, C. N. McKinnon, D. W. Pershing and R. Payne<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Energy and Environmental Research Corpor<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

8001 Irvine Blvd., Santa Ana, Calif. 92705<br />

Coal is <strong>the</strong> United St<strong>at</strong>es most abundant source <strong>of</strong> fossil fuel energy however<br />

its utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion poses several problems for society, among which are those associ<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

with <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>at</strong>mospheric pollutants during its combustion. Coal is<br />

not a pure hydrocarbon fuel, it contains inorganic m<strong>at</strong>ter (ash), nitrogen and<br />

sulfur which, in turn, form particul<strong>at</strong>es (fly ash), nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides.<br />

The emission <strong>of</strong> such pollutants to <strong>the</strong> <strong>at</strong>mosphere is undesirable and can be avoided<br />

by removing <strong>the</strong> pollutants from <strong>the</strong> combustion products, preventing <strong>the</strong>ir form<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

or removing <strong>the</strong> constituents which form pollutants from <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>. This paper<br />

describes bench scale experiments which will establish whe<strong>the</strong>r and under which conditions<br />

calcium containing sorbents can be used to capture sulfur during pulverized<br />

<strong>coal</strong> combustion. Having established th<strong>at</strong> sulfur capture is possible, <strong>the</strong> studies<br />

will <strong>the</strong>n concentr<strong>at</strong>e upon whe<strong>the</strong>r it is practical since sorbent injection into<br />

boilers could have a serious impact upon boiler oper<strong>at</strong>ion. Sorbent injection will<br />

increase particul<strong>at</strong>e mass loading, change slagging and fouling characteristics and<br />

will change fly ash <strong>properties</strong>.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> sorbents to control emissions <strong>of</strong> sulfur oxides from <strong>coal</strong> fired power<br />

plants is a conceptually simple process. A pulverized, calcium containing sorbent<br />

is injected into <strong>the</strong> combustion chamber <strong>of</strong> a boiler where it flash-calcines to lime<br />

(CaO) and, <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> same time, reacts with sulfur dioxide and oxygen to form calcium<br />

sulfite and/or calcium sulf<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

Considerable effort was expended in <strong>the</strong> l<strong>at</strong>e 1960's<br />

and early 1970's on development and demonstr<strong>at</strong>ion projects (l), and although pilot<br />

plant studies showed promise, <strong>the</strong> results could not be duplic<strong>at</strong>ed in full scale<br />

systems. The lack <strong>of</strong> success was <strong>at</strong>tributed to a combin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> reactivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lime due to deadburning and maldistribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sorbent.<br />

Recent pilot<br />

scale studies (2, 3) with low NOx <strong>coal</strong> burners suggest th<strong>at</strong> sorbent injection could<br />

be more effective under conditions which minimize NOx form<strong>at</strong>ion in pulverized <strong>coal</strong><br />

fl ames .<br />

Nitrogen oxides are formed from two sources during pulverized <strong>coal</strong> combustion;<br />

molecular nitrogen which is part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion air and nitrogen which is chemically<br />

bound in <strong>the</strong> organic <strong>coal</strong> m<strong>at</strong>rix. Low NOx pulverized <strong>coal</strong> burners are effective<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y produce a fuel rich zone which minimizes fuel NO form<strong>at</strong>ion and lowers<br />

peak flame temper<strong>at</strong>ures, which, in turn, reduces <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal NO production.<br />

If a sorbent is injected into a combustor fired with low NOx burners it will<br />

experience lower peak temper<strong>at</strong>ures and more reducing conditions than if <strong>the</strong> combustor<br />

was fired with "normal" burners. The opportunity to control both nitrogen and sulfur<br />

oxide emissions by preventing <strong>the</strong>ir form<strong>at</strong>ion may be given by <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> sorbent<br />

injection into low NOx burners.<br />

Sulfur capture by sorbent injection involves three processes, namely:<br />

0 Sorbent activ<strong>at</strong>ion - <strong>the</strong> sorbent particles are he<strong>at</strong>ed and calcined. Ultim<strong>at</strong>e<br />

particle reactivity will depend mainly upon initial <strong>properties</strong> and peak particle<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure. If <strong>the</strong> particle temper<strong>at</strong>ures are too high, <strong>the</strong> sorbent loses<br />

its reactivity (deadburns).<br />

0<br />

Capture - sulfur species (HZS, COS or S02) react with <strong>the</strong> sorbent producing<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r sulf<strong>at</strong>e or sulfide. The r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> absorption will depend upon<br />

158


temper<strong>at</strong>ure, sulfur species concentr<strong>at</strong>ion and sorbent characteristics.<br />

Regener<strong>at</strong>ion - under certain conditions, <strong>the</strong> spent sorbent may decompose<br />

regener<strong>at</strong>ing gas phase sulfur species.<br />

The general reaction describing sulfur capture under oxidizing conditions is:<br />

CaO + SO2 + 1/2 O2 + CaSo4 1)<br />

The r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> this reaction, <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> calcin<strong>at</strong>ion, and <strong>the</strong> maximum calcium utiliza-<br />

tion imposed by pore blockage has been studied extensively in thin bed and dispersed<br />

flow reactors by several workers (4, 5). None <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se studies duplic<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> time<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure conditions th<strong>at</strong> prevail in pulverized <strong>coal</strong> flames.<br />

Borgwardt (6) has suggested th<strong>at</strong> reactions such as:<br />

CaC03 + H2S + Cas + H20 + COP<br />

CaO f H2S + CaS + H20,<br />

involving reduced sulfur species could become significant under fuel rich conditions.<br />

Extrapol<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e d<strong>at</strong>a for such reactions (obtained by Ruth and Squires (7))<br />

to pulverized <strong>coal</strong> flame conditions indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction <strong>of</strong> H2S with CaC03<br />

is sufficiently fast to allow significant sulfur capture.<br />

Consequently, it appears th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are two possible modes <strong>of</strong> sulfur capture<br />

by calcium based sorbents in a pulverized <strong>coal</strong> fired combustor oper<strong>at</strong>ing under low<br />

NOx conditions. Under oxidizing conditions, reduced peak temper<strong>at</strong>ures will reduce<br />

deadburning and allow reaction 1 to proceed. If <strong>the</strong> sorbent is injected into <strong>the</strong><br />

fuel rich region, reaction 2 may become significant, but calcium sulfide could be<br />

lost when <strong>the</strong> partially oxidized fuel is burned out. Thus retention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sulfur<br />

becomes an important factor in <strong>the</strong> overall process. Figure 1 shows <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong><br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure and stoichiometric r<strong>at</strong>io on equilibrium calcium distribution.<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> under rich conditions (50% <strong>the</strong>oretical air) calcium sulfide is very<br />

stable compared to calcium sulf<strong>at</strong>e under lean conditions (100% <strong>the</strong>oretical air or<br />

SR = 1.0). These calcul<strong>at</strong>ions imply th<strong>at</strong> if <strong>the</strong> sulfide is formed in <strong>the</strong> rich zone,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> transition to oxidizing conditions should be carried out quickly to pre-<br />

vent prolonged times under new stoichiometric conditions, and th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

during this transiton should be reduced. An experimental study has been carried<br />

out to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two routes referred to above are likely to<br />

allow simul<strong>at</strong>aneous control <strong>of</strong> sulfur and nitrogen oxide emissions from pulverized<br />

<strong>coal</strong> fired boilers.<br />

2. EXPERIMENTAL<br />

A bench scale facility has been constructed which is capable <strong>of</strong> duplic<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

<strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solid particles (<strong>coal</strong> and sorbent) and <strong>the</strong> products <strong>of</strong> combustion<br />

in a pulverized <strong>coal</strong> fired power plant. As shown in Figure 2, <strong>the</strong> system consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> three major components:<br />

0 The radiant furnace, a horizontal refractory lined cyclinder, which simul<strong>at</strong>es<br />

<strong>the</strong> region close to <strong>the</strong> burners. He<strong>at</strong> extraction is varied by adding or<br />

removing cooling tubes.<br />

0 The post flame cavity which simul<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong> volume above <strong>the</strong> burner zone <strong>of</strong> a<br />

boiler before <strong>the</strong> superhe<strong>at</strong>er.<br />

0 The convective section, cooled by banks <strong>of</strong> air cooled stainless steel tubes,<br />

which simul<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong> superhe<strong>at</strong>er, rehe<strong>at</strong>er and air he<strong>at</strong>er sections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

boi 1 er .<br />

159<br />

2)<br />

3)<br />

It


Post Flame<br />

Cavity<br />

-(TJ<br />

0<br />

Temper<strong>at</strong>ure OF<br />

Figure 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> Temper<strong>at</strong>ure and Stoichiometric P,<strong>at</strong>io on Equilibrium<br />

Calcium Distribution - % Ca as CaS04 or CaS (Ca/S = 1)<br />

4-L<br />

Air + Coal- Radiant<br />

0 Sample Loc<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

0 Sorbent Injection<br />

A Internal Air Staging<br />

External Air Staging<br />

-<br />

Cooling Air<br />

II II<br />

0 Exhaust<br />

Figure 2. Schem<strong>at</strong>ic <strong>of</strong> Test Furnace Showing Loc<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Sample Ports,<br />

Staged Air Addition and Sorbent Injection.<br />

160


The facility is fired with <strong>coal</strong> using a small scale low NOx burner which could<br />

be oper<strong>at</strong>ed in two modes - internally and externally staged. When <strong>the</strong> burner was<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> second stage air supplied <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> firing face through <strong>the</strong> staged<br />

air injectors, only <strong>the</strong> burner zone was fuel rich. This is referred to as internally<br />

staged. Altern<strong>at</strong>ively, when <strong>the</strong> staging air was added downstream in <strong>the</strong> post flame<br />

cavity, <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> radiant furnace oper<strong>at</strong>ed fuel rich. This is referred to<br />

in <strong>the</strong> text as external staging. The sorbent was added in any <strong>of</strong> four loc<strong>at</strong>ions:<br />

1) with <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>, 2) with <strong>the</strong> staged air <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> burner face, 3) <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> entry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

post flame cavity, and 4) with <strong>the</strong> dowixtream staged air when oper<strong>at</strong>ing in <strong>the</strong><br />

externally staged mode.<br />

The measurement <strong>of</strong> sulfur species in combustion products containing active<br />

sorbents introduces several problems rel<strong>at</strong>ed to sample acquisition. A "phase discrimin<strong>at</strong>ion"<br />

probe has been designed, constructed and tested which minimizes gassolid<br />

contacting after sample extraction. SO2 was measured with a non-dispersive<br />

ul tra-violet absorption instrument. H2S and COS were measured by gas chrom<strong>at</strong>ography<br />

using a flame photometric detector. Sulfur capture was based on SO2 measurements<br />

with and without sorbent in every test case.<br />

3. RESULTS<br />

A series <strong>of</strong> experiments has been carried out with <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and sorbent listed<br />

in Tables 1 and 2 in both <strong>the</strong> external and internal staging modes.<br />

Indiana Coal<br />

Ultim<strong>at</strong>e Analysis, % Dry Basis<br />

C 69.91<br />

N 5.13<br />

H 1.54<br />

S 2.53<br />

0 11 .OD<br />

Ash 9.84<br />

Cslorific Value<br />

(dry bais) 12,515 Btu/lb<br />

Moisture, average,<br />

as burned 7.0%<br />

Internal Staging<br />

Table 1. Coal Properties<br />

Vicron 45-3, Pfizer<br />

Composition, typical, %<br />

CaC03 97.0<br />

MgC03 1.6<br />

sio2 1 .o<br />

2'3 0.5<br />

Fe203<br />

Moisture<br />

0.05<br />

0.2<br />

Specific Gravity<br />

Particle Shape<br />

Oil absorption<br />

Surface area (m2/gm)<br />

~~<br />

Table 2. Sorbent Properties<br />

2.71<br />

rhombic<br />

4<br />

1.4<br />

Figure 3 shows <strong>the</strong> Percentage capture as a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> calcium to sulfur<br />

molar r<strong>at</strong>io when <strong>the</strong> sorbent was added with <strong>the</strong> staged air (loc<strong>at</strong>ion 2), and an<br />

additional 15% (over <strong>the</strong> normal he<strong>at</strong> loss) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> input he<strong>at</strong> was extracted from <strong>the</strong><br />

radiant zone.<br />

D<strong>at</strong>a are presented showin <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ive capture in <strong>the</strong> radiant zone<br />

(sample port 11, <strong>the</strong> post flame section ?between 1 and 2) and <strong>the</strong> overall capture<br />

(sample port 3). The capture in <strong>the</strong> post flame section is based upon <strong>the</strong> gas phase<br />

sulfur dioxide concentr<strong>at</strong>ion entering <strong>the</strong> section and free calcium oxide (th<strong>at</strong> which<br />

was not used in <strong>the</strong> radiant section). The d<strong>at</strong>a presented in Figure 3 indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong><br />

when he<strong>at</strong> is extracted from <strong>the</strong> radiant zone capture occurs in both <strong>the</strong> radiant<br />

zone and <strong>the</strong> post flame section. These d<strong>at</strong>a were obtained with <strong>the</strong> burner zone<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>at</strong> a stoichiometric r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> 0.6 and a total air input equal to 120%<br />

<strong>of</strong> stoichiometric .<br />

161


60<br />

50<br />

aJ ><br />

.z 40<br />

rn -<br />

2 30<br />

aJ<br />

L<br />

3<br />

g 20<br />

0 R3<br />

M 10<br />

60<br />

al<br />

><br />

.r<br />

2 40<br />

7<br />

E al<br />

a, L<br />

c.’ 3<br />

a<br />

2 20<br />

zs<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Ca/S Molar R<strong>at</strong>io<br />

Figure 3. Rel<strong>at</strong>ive SO Capture, Sorbent Injected With <strong>the</strong> Staged Air<br />

Internal Mo$e With He<strong>at</strong> Extraction in <strong>the</strong> Radiant Zone.<br />

,/so2 (ca/s)<br />

Figure 4. The Impact <strong>of</strong> Load and Rad ant Zone Cooling on Sulfur Capture<br />

162


Tests have been carried out to determine <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> burner zone stoichiometry<br />

on sulfur capture in <strong>the</strong> internally staged mode. Provided <strong>the</strong> burner zone<br />

Stoichiometry does not rise above 80% <strong>the</strong> sulfur capture appears almost to be<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> burner zone stoichiometry, However as <strong>the</strong> staging air is reduced to<br />

a minimum and <strong>the</strong> burner zone becomes fuel lean <strong>the</strong> sulfur capture is reduced.<br />

<strong>the</strong>se experiments this reduction is probably caused by a reduction in sorbent velo-<br />

city and because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increase in peak flame temper<strong>at</strong>ures as <strong>the</strong> burner zone<br />

stoichiometry increases.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> internal staging mode <strong>the</strong>rmal environment has a very significant impact<br />

upon sulfur capture. This is illustr<strong>at</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a presented in Figure 4 which<br />

shows <strong>the</strong> sulfur capture in both <strong>the</strong> first two zones as a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> product<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> calcium to sulfur r<strong>at</strong>io and <strong>the</strong> square root <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sulfur dioxide concentr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

in th<strong>at</strong> zone. Three conditions are shown: high load with and without radiant<br />

zone cooling and low load without cooling. Reducing <strong>the</strong> load will lower temper<strong>at</strong>ures<br />

and increase residence times. At high load cooling <strong>the</strong> radiant zone dram<strong>at</strong>ically<br />

increases <strong>the</strong> sorbent reactivity.<br />

At low load reactivity in <strong>the</strong> radiant zone is<br />

less than th<strong>at</strong> with cooling <strong>at</strong> high load but <strong>the</strong> reactivity in <strong>the</strong> post flame section<br />

is similar to <strong>the</strong> high load, cooled case.<br />

External Staging<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> external staging tests was to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r sulfur<br />

dioxide emissions could be reduced by adding limestone under reducing conditions<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n burning <strong>the</strong> fuel completely by <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> second stage air downstream.<br />

This requires th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sulfur captured under reducing conditions be<br />

retained by <strong>the</strong> sorbent as <strong>the</strong> fuel burns out. Equilibrium calcul<strong>at</strong>ions indic<strong>at</strong>e<br />

th<strong>at</strong> under fuel rich conditions hydrogen sulfide is <strong>the</strong> dominant sulfur species while<br />

measurements in <strong>the</strong> fuel rich region indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide<br />

and carbonyl sulfide all are present. Sulfur dioxide concentr<strong>at</strong>ions decrease and<br />

hydrogen sulfide concentr<strong>at</strong>ions increase as <strong>the</strong> primary zone stoichiometry decreases.<br />

Thus, <strong>the</strong> sorbent may react with any <strong>of</strong> three sulfur species.<br />

Initial reaction<br />

r<strong>at</strong>es for <strong>the</strong> reaction <strong>of</strong> H2S and COS with CaO have been measured (7, 8) and are<br />

similar.<br />

The d<strong>at</strong>a from two different external staging experiments are shown in Figures<br />

5 and6. In one experiment sorbent was added with <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> (loc<strong>at</strong>ion 1) and measurements<br />

<strong>of</strong> sulfur species <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> exit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rich zone (port 2) were made with and<br />

without sorbent. Figure 5 shows <strong>the</strong> percent capture <strong>of</strong> SO2, COS and H2S as a function<br />

<strong>of</strong> first stage stoichiometric r<strong>at</strong>io. It can be seen th<strong>at</strong> all three species were<br />

captured. The d<strong>at</strong>a in Figure 6 are from an experiment comparing calcium utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

firing with two fuels, <strong>coal</strong> and propane doped with H2S to give <strong>the</strong> same sulfur con-<br />

tent as <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

(loc<strong>at</strong>ion 2) and <strong>the</strong> staging air was added in <strong>the</strong> post flame cavity (loc<strong>at</strong>ion b).<br />

SO2 was measured with and without sorbent for both fuels <strong>at</strong> sample port 3 (exit <strong>of</strong><br />

furnace). Total calcium utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion as a function <strong>of</strong> first stage stoichiometry<br />

is shown in Figure 6. Measurements indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> as much as 50 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

input <strong>coal</strong> remains as solid <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower first zone stoichiometries. The d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

for <strong>coal</strong> presented in Figure 6 has been plotted as a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> actual gas<br />

phase stoichiometry.<br />

decreasing gas phase stoichiometric r<strong>at</strong>io for <strong>coal</strong> but increased for propane doped<br />

with H2S. It should be noted th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a shown in Figure 6 represent <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong><br />

sulfur species capture under reducing conditions in <strong>the</strong> first zone, retention <strong>of</strong><br />

sulfur during burnout and <strong>the</strong> sulfur capture under oxidizing conditions in <strong>the</strong><br />

second stage.<br />

4. CONCLUSIONS<br />

The sorbent was added <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> post flame section<br />

It can be seen th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> ultim<strong>at</strong>e sulfur capture decreased with<br />

An investig<strong>at</strong>ion has been carried out in a bench scale facility to determine<br />

163<br />

In


60-<br />

a, 40-<br />

3<br />

+J Q<br />

m<br />

as<br />

20-<br />

0<br />

I 1 1 1 1 1 -<br />

SO2 -<br />

- -<br />

-A A<br />

-<br />

- n -<br />

1 1 1 1 1 1 '<br />

Figure 5. % Capture <strong>of</strong> Sulfur Specie in Rich First Stage (External Mode)<br />

Sorbent Injected With <strong>the</strong> Coal.<br />

30<br />

i= 20<br />

0<br />

.r<br />

+J<br />

m N<br />

.C<br />

7 .r<br />

+J<br />

1<br />

E<br />

2<br />

.C<br />

u<br />

7<br />

2 10<br />

%?<br />

v<br />

OC a1<br />

Propane + H ~ S<br />

I I I I I I I I<br />

.4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1.0 1.1 1.2<br />

First Stage Stoichiometry R<strong>at</strong>io (Gas Phase)<br />

Figure 6. Capture and Retention <strong>of</strong> Sulfur Under External Staged<br />

Conditions for Coai and Propane Doped with H2S.<br />

164


under which conditions sulfur species gener<strong>at</strong>ed during <strong>the</strong> combustion <strong>of</strong> pulverized<br />

<strong>coal</strong> can be captured and retained by calcium containing sorbents. Two series <strong>of</strong><br />

experiments were carried out: one in which any capture would take place primarily<br />

under oxidizing conditions and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r in which significant residence times in<br />

<strong>the</strong> rich zone would allow capture under reducing conditions. Under oxidizing conditions<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal environment experienced by <strong>the</strong> sorbent particle appears to be <strong>the</strong><br />

dominant parameter controlling sulfur capture. This is probably because <strong>of</strong> deadburning.<br />

If a sorbent particle's temper<strong>at</strong>ure exceeds a certain limit (which depends<br />

on <strong>the</strong> particular sorbent) <strong>the</strong> sorbent deadburns and loses its reactivity (4).<br />

The processes controlling capture and retention when <strong>the</strong> sorbent is maintained<br />

under reducing conditions for a prolonged time are more complex. The principle<br />

gas phase sulfur specie are HzS, SO2 and COS and, even though <strong>the</strong> sulfur species are<br />

absorbed <strong>the</strong> possibility th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> sulfide will decompose during burnout exists.<br />

The d<strong>at</strong>a presented in Figure 6 shows a significant difference between <strong>the</strong> behavior<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and propane doped with H2S. This difference can be <strong>at</strong>tributed to:<br />

- With <strong>coal</strong> part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fuel remains in <strong>the</strong> solid phase and for a given<br />

input stoichiometry <strong>the</strong> gas phase stoichiometry in <strong>the</strong> reducing zone is<br />

higher than with gas. Reference to Figure 1 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> stability<br />

<strong>of</strong> calcium sulfide is strongly dependent upon stoichiometry r<strong>at</strong>io;<br />

-<br />

With <strong>coal</strong> up to 50 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sulfur remains in <strong>the</strong> solid phase under<br />

rich conditions thus <strong>the</strong> gas phase concentr<strong>at</strong>ion is lower than <strong>the</strong> corres-<br />

ponding concentr<strong>at</strong>ion with propane as <strong>the</strong> fuel;<br />

- The conditions during burnout in <strong>the</strong> second stage will be different for <strong>the</strong><br />

solid and gaseous fuels and this could affect retention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sulfur<br />

during burnout.<br />

These tests indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> potential to remove gre<strong>at</strong>er than 50<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> input sulfur with Ca/S molar r<strong>at</strong>ios <strong>of</strong> two when <strong>coal</strong> is burned<br />

under low NOx conditions. Fur<strong>the</strong>r work is necessary to insure th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> controlling<br />

conditions can be achieved in practical combustors and th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> sorbent injection<br />

does not adversely impact combustor performance.<br />

References<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

Gartrell, F.F., "Full Scale Desulfuriz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Stack Gas by Dry Limestone<br />

Injection", EPA-650/2-73-019 a, b, c, 1973.<br />

Zallen, D.M., Gershman, R., Heap, M.P., Nurick, W.H., "The Generaliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

Low Emission Coal Burner Technology", Proceedings, Third St<strong>at</strong>ionary Source<br />

Combustion Symposium, EPA-600/7-70-050 b, 1979.<br />

Flament, G., "The Simultaneous Reduction <strong>of</strong> NOx and SO2 in Coal Flames by<br />

Direct Injection <strong>of</strong> Sorbents in a Staged Mixing Burner", IFRF doc. no.<br />

G 19/a/10, 1981.<br />

Coutant, R.W., et al., "Investig<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reactivity <strong>of</strong> Limestone and<br />

Dolomite for Capturing SO2 from Flue Gas", B<strong>at</strong>elle Memorial Institute,<br />

Final Report, EPA Contract PH-86-67-115, 1970.<br />

Borgwardt, R.H., "Kinetic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reaction <strong>of</strong> SO2 with Calcined Limestone",<br />

NAPCA, Vol. 4, p. 59, 1970.<br />

Borgwardt, R.H., Present<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> EPA SPO Contractors Meeting, Raleigh,<br />

North Carolina, October 1981.<br />

165


7. Ruth, L.A., Squires, A.M, Gr<strong>at</strong>t, R.A., "Desulfuriz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Fuels with Half-<br />

Calcined Dolomite: First Kinetic D<strong>at</strong>a", Environmental Science & Technology,<br />

Vol. 6, p. 1007, 1972.<br />

8.<br />

Yang, R.T., Chen, J.M., "Kinetics <strong>of</strong> Desulfuriz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Hot Fuel Gas with<br />

Calcium Oxide. Reaction Between Carbonyl Sulfide and Calcium Oxide",<br />

Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 13, p. 549, 1979.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

This work has been supported under EPA Contract 68-02-2667. The authors are<br />

pleased to acknowledge <strong>the</strong> encouragement and ideas provided by Dr. D. C. Drehmel<br />

and G. B. Martin <strong>of</strong> EPA and <strong>the</strong> contributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir colleagues <strong>at</strong> EER in <strong>the</strong><br />

execution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiments.<br />

166


I TITANIUM<br />

L Corn<br />

AS A TRACER FOR DETERMINING COAL BURNOUT<br />

Ray S. Pace, Paul 0. Hedman, and L. Douglas Smoot<br />

bu s t i on La bora tory<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering<br />

Brigham Young University<br />

Provo, Utah 84602<br />

I<br />

li<br />

1'<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Background. Extensive research on <strong>coal</strong> combustion <strong>at</strong> this labor<strong>at</strong>ory (1-6)<br />

has focuse on developing an understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical and chemical mechanisms<br />

and reactidon r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> burnout and nitrogen and sulfur pollutant form<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

( Local samples <strong>of</strong> combustion products have been extracted from <strong>the</strong> pulverized <strong>coal</strong><br />

'i combustor using w<strong>at</strong>er-quenched sample probes. To complete mass balances and<br />

1<br />

I:<br />

deternine important local parameters, chemically inert tracers have been used in <strong>the</strong><br />

reactor. Argon added to <strong>the</strong> primary air has been used as <strong>the</strong> gas phase tracer to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> mixing r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary and secondary air streams and <strong>the</strong> volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> combustion gases from <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>. Carbon conversion i s also determined from gas<br />

composition, <strong>coal</strong> feed r<strong>at</strong>e, and a forced argon balance.<br />

\ Coal burnout has been calcul<strong>at</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> percent ash in <strong>the</strong> residual char and<br />

in <strong>the</strong> raw <strong>coal</strong> in previous phases <strong>of</strong> this study (4-6). However, <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> ash as<br />

a particle tracer has not been s<strong>at</strong>isfactory. Ash is not a suitable tracer because<br />

it contains many inorganic compounds which decompose and/or vaporize. Kobayashi , et al. (7) and Sar<strong>of</strong>im, et al. (8) have shown th<strong>at</strong> as much as 20-60 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

original <strong>coal</strong> ash can be vol<strong>at</strong>ilized depending on <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

ash.<br />

Collecting samples <strong>of</strong> combustion products with a w<strong>at</strong>er-quench probe produces a<br />

char-w<strong>at</strong>er mixture which is filtered and dryed to obtain <strong>the</strong> solid char sample.<br />

Hany constituents <strong>of</strong> ash are soluble in <strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er and more losses are incurred in<br />

<strong>the</strong> total measured ash content. Harding, et al. (6) have shown th<strong>at</strong> up to 10<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ash can be dissolved in <strong>the</strong> probe quench w<strong>at</strong>er.<br />

High losses <strong>of</strong> ash neg<strong>at</strong>e its usefulness as a solid tracer by introducing<br />

large errors into <strong>the</strong> mass balance and burnout calcul<strong>at</strong>ions. Consequently, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

has been an interest in finding ano<strong>the</strong>r particle tracer which could more accur<strong>at</strong>ely<br />

determine <strong>coal</strong> burnout, and also to help understand <strong>the</strong> f<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ash and slag.<br />

Hims, et al. (9) have characterized <strong>the</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> ash with<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure. At higher temper<strong>at</strong>ures, compounds formed from elements such as<br />

arsenic, manganese, magnesium, sodium and antimony showed strong vaporiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

trends. A1 uminum, si1 icon and o<strong>the</strong>r known refractory compounds a1 so showed<br />

significant losses <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ures. Compounds formed from such elements as<br />

titanium, scandium, barium and lanthanum were found to be more stable. Because <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir low concentr<strong>at</strong>ions in <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s, scandium and lanthanum were not considered as<br />

feasible tracers. Titanium was selected as a possible tracer because it forms<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ively stable high boiling point compounds (i.e., TiO, Tic, TiO2, Ti4071, and is<br />

found in most <strong>coal</strong>s in easily detectable amounts.<br />

Objectives. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to develop an analytical procedure<br />

which could be used to measure <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a solid particle tracer and<br />

apply <strong>the</strong> techniques to represent<strong>at</strong>ive samples from <strong>the</strong> pulverized <strong>coal</strong> combustor.<br />

Techniques commonly used to analyze elements in <strong>the</strong> ash are <strong>at</strong>omic absorption (AA),<br />

instrumental neutron activ<strong>at</strong>ion analysis (INAA), x-ray diffraction (XRD), and x-ray<br />

fluorescence (XRF). XRF was chosen because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ease <strong>of</strong> analysis (sample<br />

prepar<strong>at</strong>ion time 10-15 minutes and analysis time <strong>of</strong> 40-120 seconds), and<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> a suitable instrument. Comparison <strong>of</strong> M, INAA and XRF results for<br />

167


fly ash and <strong>coal</strong> analysis have been found to give good agreement for most elements<br />

(10).<br />

This study was divided into three tasks: (1) set-up and calibr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

XRF instrument in order to measure titanium trace element concentr<strong>at</strong>ion in char from<br />

<strong>the</strong> combustor, (2) analysis <strong>of</strong> char samples from combustor tests to determine <strong>the</strong><br />

usefulness <strong>of</strong> titanium in <strong>the</strong> ash as a tracer, and (3) use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> titanium tracer<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a to compute mass balances and consequently <strong>coal</strong> burnout.<br />

TEST FACILITIES<br />

A diagram <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pulverized <strong>coal</strong> combustor with major dimensions is shown in<br />

Figure 1. The reactor, with a <strong>coal</strong> feedr<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> about 13.6 kg/hour, was constructed<br />

<strong>of</strong> five interchangable sections <strong>of</strong> 33 cm (14 in.) schedule 40 pipe. Each section<br />

was 30.4 cm in length and lined with 6.4 cm <strong>of</strong> castable aluminum oxide refractory.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> five sections contained a w<strong>at</strong>er-quench, traversing probe which was used<br />

to sample <strong>the</strong> flame <strong>at</strong> different axial loc<strong>at</strong>ions in <strong>the</strong> reactor. This section could<br />

be interchanged with any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sections in order to obtain gas and char<br />

samples <strong>at</strong> various radial and axial loc<strong>at</strong>ions, effectively mapping <strong>the</strong> reactor. A<br />

more detailed description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustor and its supporting facilities has been<br />

reported (4-6).<br />

In order to obtain an adequ<strong>at</strong>e sample <strong>of</strong> combustion char for ASTM ash and XRF<br />

Ti analysis, a special larger exit sample probe was used. The probe detail <strong>of</strong><br />

Figure 1 shows <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> probe tip th<strong>at</strong> permitted centerline char sample<br />

collection near <strong>the</strong> reactor exit without interfering with o<strong>the</strong>r combustor<br />

experiments. Both probes were similar in design, differing only in size. Complete<br />

details on <strong>the</strong> design and oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> probes have been documented (6, 11, 12).<br />

INSTRUMENTATION<br />

A Phillips 1410 vacuum p<strong>at</strong>h x-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer was used to<br />

analyze titaniun in <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> samples. XRF is known for <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ively quick sample<br />

analysis time and sample prepar<strong>at</strong>ion time (10). Quantit<strong>at</strong>ive measurements <strong>of</strong> Ti on<br />

<strong>the</strong> XRF required values for five correction factors: detector dead time, background<br />

count, peak overlap, absorption corrections, and instrument electronic and power<br />

drift. Each factor is briefly discussed below.<br />

Dead Time. Dead time is <strong>the</strong> time required for <strong>the</strong> electronics and detector to<br />

register one count <strong>of</strong> radi<strong>at</strong>ion. If a second burst <strong>of</strong> radi<strong>at</strong>ion arrives <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

detector before <strong>the</strong> first burst is registered, <strong>the</strong> second burst will not be<br />

registered. The bursts <strong>of</strong> radi<strong>at</strong>ion are assumed to be st<strong>at</strong>istically random and a<br />

simple correl<strong>at</strong>ion is used to quantify <strong>the</strong> dead-time correction (13).<br />

Background Counts. N<strong>at</strong>ural sc<strong>at</strong>tering <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> x-rays causes a small count to<br />

be present <strong>at</strong> every angle on <strong>the</strong> XRF. The background counts vary non-linearly and<br />

compens<strong>at</strong>ion is made by estim<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> background <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> peak using an average <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> background <strong>at</strong> angles below and above <strong>the</strong> peak.<br />

Peak Overlap. Peaks within one or two degrees <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> measured peak may add to<br />

<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> counts <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> desired peak position. Corrections for <strong>the</strong>se overlaps<br />

are made by measuring pure disks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interfering element and determining <strong>the</strong><br />

height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> peak <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> desired angle.<br />

Absorption and Instrument Drift. Fluorescence from an element within <strong>the</strong><br />

sample m<strong>at</strong>rix could be absorbed by ano<strong>the</strong>r element, altering <strong>the</strong> intensity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

peak <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> desired element. Carbon and o<strong>the</strong>r lighter elements are strong absorbers<br />

<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> wavelength <strong>of</strong> radi<strong>at</strong>ion from titanium. This causes major problems when<br />

Organic concentr<strong>at</strong>ions in <strong>the</strong> char vary from 0 to 94 percent. This problem is<br />

circumvented by using <strong>the</strong> internal standard method <strong>of</strong> calibr<strong>at</strong>ion. Instrument drift<br />

168


E<br />

6<br />

i<br />

i<br />

h<br />

\<br />

1<br />

1<br />

\<br />

on <strong>the</strong> XRF is caused by vari<strong>at</strong>ions in <strong>the</strong> voltage, sample placement, and goniometer<br />

accuracy on <strong>the</strong> machine. These are also compens<strong>at</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> internal standard method<br />

(141.<br />

XRF Calibr<strong>at</strong>ion. The internal standard method <strong>of</strong> calibr<strong>at</strong>ion (14) was chosen<br />

as <strong>the</strong> Calibr<strong>at</strong>ion technique. Scandium as Sc20 , which has an absorption edge near<br />

those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> element being measured, was added to <strong>the</strong> char sample in a known<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ion. Since absorption effects are similar for <strong>the</strong> two elements, <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unknown to <strong>the</strong> standard element was rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong><br />

r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intensities by a constant factor A:<br />

WTi/Wsc = A CTi/Csc (1)<br />

where A is a constant factor, C T ~ and Csc are <strong>the</strong> measured counts <strong>of</strong> radi<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> peaks for titanium and scandium in <strong>the</strong> sample, respectively. This r<strong>at</strong>io<br />

technique elimin<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong> need for absorption corrections because <strong>the</strong> peaks are in<br />

<strong>the</strong> same sample, and <strong>the</strong> absorption correction factors are nearly equal.<br />

Calibr<strong>at</strong>ion after every third sample prevented major errors due to machine drift.<br />

Calibr<strong>at</strong>ion consisted <strong>of</strong> analyzing a cellulose blank to determine background factors<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n analyzing a NBS fly ash standard (NBS Standard Reference id<strong>at</strong>erial 1633a1<br />

for titanium to determine <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> A in Eqn. 1.<br />

XRF Error Analysis. The counting st<strong>at</strong>istics and equ<strong>at</strong>ions for <strong>the</strong> XRF error<br />

' analysis are explained in detail by Jenkins and DeVries (13). The arrival <strong>of</strong> bursts<br />

<strong>of</strong> radi<strong>at</strong>ion from <strong>the</strong> sample can be modeled as a Chi Square distribution which<br />

approaches a Gaussian distribution. A total XRF counting error <strong>of</strong> t0.4 percent<br />

(rel<strong>at</strong>ive') was realized for <strong>the</strong> tests conducted. This gave a limit <strong>of</strong> detection <strong>of</strong><br />

45 ppm (mass). The raw <strong>coal</strong> contained about 400-600 ppm titaniun (dry basis), well<br />

above <strong>the</strong> minimum.<br />

The XRF counting errors were very small. The major errors were introduced by<br />

<strong>the</strong> sample prepar<strong>at</strong>ion techniques. Samples were prepared by weighing 400 mg <strong>of</strong><br />

char, 40 mg <strong>of</strong> high purity cellulose and 10 mg <strong>of</strong> SC~OJ into a small vial with a 6mm<br />

glass ball. A commerical dental mixer was used to mix and grind <strong>the</strong> sample for 3<br />

minutes. The ample was <strong>the</strong>n pressed onto a support with a cellulose backing <strong>at</strong><br />

4.58 x lo6 kgln 3 . The major errors introduced in weighing <strong>the</strong> Sc2O3 accur<strong>at</strong>ely were<br />

t1 to 2 percent. Increasing <strong>the</strong> percent Sc2O3 did not significantly increase <strong>the</strong><br />

accuracy because <strong>of</strong> increased error due to increased scandium counts.<br />

TEST PROGRAM<br />

Fifteen combustor tests were performed <strong>at</strong> four different values <strong>of</strong> secondary<br />

air swirl number2 (Sg = 0.0, 1.4, 3.2, and 4.51, and over a range <strong>of</strong> stoichiometric<br />

r<strong>at</strong>ios3 (SR) <strong>of</strong> 0.59 to 1.65. The <strong>coal</strong> used was a Wyoming subbituminous <strong>coal</strong> with<br />

about 5.0 weight percent ash (as received1 and 0.8 weight percent titanium in <strong>the</strong><br />

dry ash. The proxim<strong>at</strong>e analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> gave values <strong>of</strong> 27.8 percent, 32.9<br />

percent, 34.3 percent, and 0.4 percent for moisture, vol<strong>at</strong>iles, fixed carbon, and<br />

IRel<strong>at</strong>ive error is error divided by percent titanium present times one<br />

hundred.<br />

'Swirl number (SEI is defined as <strong>the</strong> flux <strong>of</strong> angular momentum divided by <strong>the</strong><br />

product <strong>of</strong> duct radius and axial flux <strong>of</strong> momentum.<br />

3Soichiometric r<strong>at</strong>io (SR) is defined as <strong>the</strong> airlfuel r<strong>at</strong>io divided by <strong>the</strong><br />

stoichiometric airlfuel r<strong>at</strong>io. SR values less than one are fuel rich while SR<br />

values gre<strong>at</strong>er than one are oxidizer rich.<br />

169


sulfur respectively. The ultim<strong>at</strong>e analysis on a dry basis gave 6.9 percent ash, 4.4<br />

percent hydrogen, 76.3 percent carbon, 1.1 percent nitrogen, 0.5 percent sulfur and<br />

10.8 percent oxygen. The char sample probe was loc<strong>at</strong>ed on <strong>the</strong> center line <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

reactor near <strong>the</strong> reactor exit (ca 150 cm from <strong>the</strong> burner inlet). Coal burnout was<br />

determined <strong>at</strong> each test condition from ASTM analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ash sample, and by XRF<br />

analysis for titanium in <strong>the</strong> char Sample.<br />

TEST RESULTS<br />

Coal burnout results determined from a titanium mass balance in <strong>the</strong> char<br />

samples obtained are shown in Figure 2. Coal burnout was shown to be primarily a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> stoichiometric r<strong>at</strong>io, increasing from about 80-87 percent <strong>at</strong> SR = 0.6<br />

(fuel rich) to gre<strong>at</strong>er than 95 percent <strong>at</strong> SR > 1.1 (Figure 2(al). The tests were<br />

not all conducted <strong>at</strong> a consistent set <strong>of</strong> stoichiometric r<strong>at</strong>ios. idever<strong>the</strong>less,<br />

interpol<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> curves (Figure 2(a)) <strong>at</strong> SR = 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 has permitted<br />

<strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> swirl in <strong>the</strong> secondary air stream to be determined (Figure 2 (b)).<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> stoichio.metric r<strong>at</strong>io is still quite pronounced. The effect <strong>of</strong><br />

secondary swirl on <strong>coal</strong> burnout is small. The combustion <strong>of</strong> pulverized <strong>coal</strong> is very<br />

complex and <strong>the</strong> influences <strong>of</strong> secondary swirl, mixing r<strong>at</strong>e, stoichiometric r<strong>at</strong>io,<br />

etc. are just beginning to be understood (1-6).<br />

An ASTM analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> char samples for ash and titanium as a tie component<br />

are given in Figure 3. Titanium burnout is higher in every case than <strong>the</strong> ash<br />

burnout, indic<strong>at</strong>ing th<strong>at</strong> titanium is a better tracer than ash.<br />

The extent <strong>of</strong> ash loss, equivalent to an ash burnout, has also been determined<br />

from <strong>the</strong> titanium d<strong>at</strong>a. A set <strong>of</strong> parametric ash loss lines have also been<br />

constructed on Figure 3 for comparison (10 percent, 20 percent, 30 percent, 40<br />

percent, and 50 percent). Ash losses <strong>of</strong> 15 to 60 percent can be observed by <strong>the</strong><br />

superposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a on <strong>the</strong> various ash loss lines. The extent <strong>of</strong> ash loss is<br />

large compared to earlier work <strong>at</strong> this labor<strong>at</strong>ory with a bituminous <strong>coal</strong> (6).<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> difference in <strong>coal</strong> type, ash composition, and moisture level could<br />

account for <strong>the</strong>se differences.<br />

Ash loss has little effect on <strong>coal</strong> burnout <strong>at</strong> very high burnout levels.<br />

Figure 4 shows <strong>the</strong> error in burnout due to ash loss <strong>at</strong> several different burnout<br />

levels. At burnout values <strong>of</strong> 95 percent, ash losses <strong>of</strong> 40-50 percent cre<strong>at</strong>e<br />

differences <strong>of</strong> only 2-3 percent in burnout estim<strong>at</strong>es. Hence <strong>at</strong> moder<strong>at</strong>e ash loss<br />

(20-40 percent) and high burnout values (gre<strong>at</strong>er than 95 percent burnout) <strong>the</strong> ash<br />

tracer burnout values are almost as accur<strong>at</strong>e as <strong>the</strong> titanium-based burnout values.<br />

However, if burnout is below 95 percent <strong>the</strong>n burnout based on titanium gave<br />

significantly improved results.<br />

Asay (12) has recently completed as set <strong>of</strong> pulverized <strong>coal</strong> combustion tests<br />

<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> same secondary swirl numbers and <strong>at</strong> nearly <strong>the</strong> same stoichiometric r<strong>at</strong>ios for<br />

this Wyoming <strong>coal</strong>. Carbon burnout d<strong>at</strong>a obtained from <strong>the</strong>se tests with a complete<br />

gas coumposition and an argon tracer mass balance are compared in Figure 5 to <strong>the</strong><br />

titanium analysis <strong>coal</strong> burnout d<strong>at</strong>a reported above. In general, <strong>coal</strong> burnout is<br />

expected to be from 1-2 percent higher than carbon burnout because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more<br />

complete release <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hydrogen from <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong>. In general, <strong>the</strong> agreement between<br />

burnout values from <strong>the</strong> gas analysis and from <strong>the</strong> titanium analysis is good <strong>at</strong> SR ><br />

0.9. At SR = 0.6 however, <strong>the</strong> burnout values determined from <strong>the</strong> gas analysis are<br />

much lower. Asay (12) is still reviewing this discrepancy but it is thought th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a from <strong>the</strong> titanium analysis are superior. One possible explan<strong>at</strong>ion is th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> gas d<strong>at</strong>a represent an integr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> radial gas composition pr<strong>of</strong>iles near <strong>the</strong><br />

reactor exit while <strong>the</strong> titanium d<strong>at</strong>a are based on centerline samples.<br />

170


\<br />

?<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Titanium can accur<strong>at</strong>ely be determined in char samples by using <strong>the</strong> internal<br />

standard method <strong>of</strong> XRF calibr<strong>at</strong>ion. Errors <strong>of</strong> i 2-3 percent are incurred mostly<br />

I from sample prepar<strong>at</strong>ion inaccuracy. X-ray fluorescence instrument error is less<br />

I than f 0.4 percent.<br />

Titanium compounds in ash are more stable than <strong>the</strong> total ash constituents and<br />

hence provide a solid phase tracer to complete overall mass balances with increased<br />

accuracy. Burnout calcul<strong>at</strong>ions are improved by as much as 20 percent <strong>at</strong> burnout<br />

values less than 95 percent and with high ash loss. Vhen <strong>coal</strong> burnout level is<br />

above 95 percent, titanium provides only 1-2 percent increased accuracy in <strong>the</strong><br />

burnout calcul<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> titanium tracer also provides a method <strong>of</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ing ash loss. Up<br />

to 60 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ash was lost in <strong>the</strong>se combustion tests. This loss is <strong>the</strong> sum<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> losses due to vaporiz<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> flame and dissolution into <strong>the</strong> quench<br />

w<strong>at</strong>er.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

Blaine Asay, Steven Zaugg, and Rodney LaFollette assisted in <strong>the</strong> combustion<br />

tests while technician, drafting, and secretarial services were provided by Michael<br />

R. King, K<strong>at</strong>hleen Hartman, and Ruth Ann Christensen, respectively.<br />

This research project was supported by <strong>the</strong> EPRI under contract RP-364-2 with<br />

Mr. John Dimer as project <strong>of</strong>ficer, and by <strong>the</strong> Brigham Young University Research<br />

Division.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. L.D. Smoot, P.O. Hedman. "Mixing and Kinetic Processes in Pulverized Coal<br />

Combustors." Final report prepared for EPRI, Contract ib. RP-364-1, August<br />

1978.<br />

2. L.D. Smoot, P.O. Hedman, and P.J. Smith. "Mixinq and Kinetic Processe in<br />

Pulverized -Coal Combustor-s."<br />

364-1-3, October 1979.<br />

Final report prepared -for EPRI, Contract No. RP-<br />

3. L.D. Smoot, P.O. Hedman, and P.J. Smith. "Cornbustion Processes in a<br />

Pulverized Coal Combustor." Final report prepared for EPRI, Contract No. RP-<br />

364-2, August 1981.<br />

4. J.R. Thurgood, L.D. Smoot, and P.O. Hedman. "R<strong>at</strong>e bieasurernents in a<br />

Labor<strong>at</strong>ory-Scale Pulverized Coal<br />

Technology, 1, 1980, pp. 213-225.<br />

Combustor." Combustion Science and<br />

5. D.P. Rees, L.D. Smoot, and P.O. Hedman. "Nitrogen Oxide Form<strong>at</strong>ion Inside a<br />

Labor<strong>at</strong>ory Pulverized Coal Combustor." 18th Synposiun (Intern<strong>at</strong>ional) on<br />

Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1981 9 PP.<br />

T305-1311.<br />

6. N.S. Harding, L.D. Smoot, and P.O. Hedman. "Nitrogen Pollutant Form<strong>at</strong>ion in a<br />

pulverized Coal Combusor: The Effect <strong>of</strong> Secondary Stream Swirl .I' accepted<br />

for public<strong>at</strong>ion in AIChE Journal, 1982.<br />

7. H. Kobayashi,,, J.B. Howard and A.F. Sar<strong>of</strong>im. "Coal Devol<strong>at</strong>iliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> High<br />

Temper<strong>at</strong>ures. 16th Symposium (Intern<strong>at</strong>ional on Combustion, Combustion<br />

Institute, Pittsburgh Pennsylvaniz, 1977, p. 411.


8. A.F. Sar<strong>of</strong>im, J.B. Howard, A.S. Padia. "The Physical Transform<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Mineral M<strong>at</strong>ter in Pulverized Coal Under Simul<strong>at</strong>ed Combustion Conditions,"<br />

Combustion Science and Technology, 16, 1977, pp. 187-204.<br />

9. C.A. iilims, M. Neville, R.J. Quann and A.F. Sar<strong>of</strong>im. "Labor<strong>at</strong>ory Studies <strong>of</strong><br />

Trace Element Transforn<strong>at</strong>ions During Coal Combustion." 87th AIChE N<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

Yeeting, August 19, 1979.<br />

10. 9.0. Smith. "The Trace Element Chemistrv <strong>of</strong> Coal Durins Combustion and <strong>the</strong><br />

Emissions from Coal-Fired Plants." Progress in Energy and Combustion Science,<br />

Vol. 6, Number 1, 1980, pp. 53-119.<br />

11. R.S. Pace, "Titanium as a Tracer for Determining Burnout in a Labor<strong>at</strong>ory<br />

Pulverized Coal Combustor," N.S. Thesis, Brigham Young University, in<br />

prepar<strong>at</strong>ion, December, 1981.<br />

12. B. Asay, "Measurement <strong>of</strong> Nitrogen Pollutants and o<strong>the</strong>r Combustion Products in<br />

a Swelling Pulverized Coal Flame," Ph.0 Oissert<strong>at</strong>ion, Brigham Young I<br />

University, in prepar<strong>at</strong>ion, 1982.<br />

13. R. Jenkins and J.L. DeVries. Practical X-Ray Spectrometry. 2nd ed., New<br />

York: Springer-Verlag Inc., Gre<strong>at</strong> Bri tain, 1969.<br />

14. K. Yorrish and 3.N. Chappell. "X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrography." ed. by J.<br />

Zassnan, Physical Methods in Determin<strong>at</strong>ion Mineralogy, New York: Academic<br />

Press, 196/, pp. 2Ul-Z/Z.<br />

Probe Detail<br />

Secondary Air .<br />

stream -<br />

Moveable<br />

Primary Air<br />

152 4 cm<br />

Figure I. Schem<strong>at</strong>ic <strong>of</strong> <strong>at</strong>mospheric combustor (Adaoted from Narding (61).<br />

172


NY)<br />

m *<br />

oa


BED AGGLOMERATES FORMED BY ATMOSPHERIC FLUIDIZED<br />

BED COMBUSTION OF A NORTH DAKOTA LIGNITE<br />

Steven A. Benson, Frank R. Karner, and Gerald M. Goblirsch<br />

Grand Forks Energy Technology Center<br />

U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy<br />

Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202<br />

David W. Brekke<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Geology<br />

University <strong>of</strong> North Dakota<br />

Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The goal <strong>of</strong> <strong>at</strong>mospheric fluidized bed combustion (AFBC) research <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Grand Forks Energy Technology Center is to provide a d<strong>at</strong>a base for design, opera-<br />

tion, process control, and emission control requirements for low-rank <strong>coal</strong>s. The<br />

applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AFBC process has <strong>the</strong> potential to solve some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> problems<br />

associ<strong>at</strong>ed with conventional combustion. These problems are .ash fouling on he<strong>at</strong><br />

exchange surfaces, <strong>the</strong> expense and reliability <strong>of</strong> SO2 control devices such as<br />

scrubbers, and <strong>the</strong> system sensitivity to fuel variables (moisture, Na20 concentra-<br />

tion, etc.).<br />

These problems can be reduced by <strong>the</strong> AFBC process for low-rank <strong>coal</strong>s be-<br />

cause <strong>the</strong> alkaline characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ash or sorbent added directly to <strong>the</strong> com-<br />

bustion zone provides <strong>the</strong> sulfur retention, which would elimin<strong>at</strong>e or reduce <strong>the</strong><br />

need for post combustion SO2 controls. The temper<strong>at</strong>ures in <strong>the</strong> combustion zone<br />

are <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> right levels to provide maximum reaction <strong>of</strong> SO2 and alkali to form solid<br />

alkali sulf<strong>at</strong>e waste. One problem which <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed combustion <strong>of</strong> low-rank<br />

<strong>coal</strong>s seems to exhibit is a tendency toward <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> agglomer<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

m<strong>at</strong>erial which are used to make up <strong>the</strong> bed. Agglomer<strong>at</strong>es in this case are defined<br />

as a cluster <strong>of</strong> individual bed m<strong>at</strong>erial particles held toge<strong>the</strong>r by a substance not<br />

yet well understood, and manifest in many differing forms. The understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> mechanism <strong>of</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se agglomer<strong>at</strong>es is vital to <strong>the</strong>ir control, and <strong>the</strong>re-<br />

fore <strong>the</strong> full utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> low-rank <strong>coal</strong> in AFBC.<br />

Once formed <strong>the</strong>se agglomer<strong>at</strong>es will tend to decrease he<strong>at</strong> transfer, and fluidi-<br />

z<strong>at</strong>ion quality resulting in poor combustion efficiency and loss <strong>of</strong> control <strong>of</strong> bed oper-<br />

<strong>at</strong>ional parameters (i.e., excess air, temper<strong>at</strong>ure, etc.). In severe cases <strong>the</strong> forma-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> agglomer<strong>at</strong>es can lead to a forced prem<strong>at</strong>ure shutdown <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> limestone, or calcium bearing m<strong>at</strong>erials into <strong>the</strong> fluid bed,<br />

or <strong>the</strong> forming <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed itself by limestone particles has shown a tendency to in-<br />

hibit <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> agglomer<strong>at</strong>es, agglomer<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> a severe n<strong>at</strong>ure have been ob-<br />

served in a bed <strong>of</strong> limestone alone, or limestone and sand particle mixtures while<br />

burning a high sodium <strong>coal</strong> for an extended period <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

In general with a high sodium <strong>coal</strong> <strong>the</strong> agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> limestone bed m<strong>at</strong>erial<br />

is dependent only on <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> run time, if <strong>the</strong> run is long enough agglomera-<br />

tion in a limestone bed will occur, and can be as devast<strong>at</strong>ing as those which occur<br />

with a silica bed.<br />

174


GFETC constructed a 0.2 square meter experimental AFBC. A detailed description<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unit is given by Goblirsch and o<strong>the</strong>rs (1).<br />

<strong>at</strong>ed over a wide range <strong>of</strong> conditions as listed below:<br />

The combustor can be oper-<br />

Average bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure -- 700 to 982OC<br />

Superficial gas velocity -- 0.9-2.7 m/sec<br />

Excess air -- 10 to 50%<br />

Ash reinjection<br />

(% Of primary cyclone c<strong>at</strong>ch) -- 0 to 100%.<br />

The nominal <strong>coal</strong> feed r<strong>at</strong>e is 80 kg/hr <strong>at</strong> 1.8 m/sec superficial gas velocity and 20%<br />

excess air.<br />

This paper discusses <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> quartz or limestone as a bed m<strong>at</strong>erial<br />

during <strong>the</strong> combusting <strong>of</strong> high sodium North Dakota lignite. The lignite is from <strong>the</strong><br />

Beulah mine <strong>of</strong> Mercer County, North Dakota. The composite <strong>coal</strong> and <strong>coal</strong> ash anal-<br />

ysis is summarized in Table 1. The lignite was partially dried before this series <strong>of</strong><br />

tests; its as-mined moisture content was 3630, and its he<strong>at</strong>ing valve 15,000 J/g.<br />

TABLE 1. TYPICAL COAL AND COAL ASH ANALYSIS<br />

OF HIGH Na BEULAH LIGNITE<br />

Ultim<strong>at</strong>e Analysis , As Fired Coal Ash Analysis, % <strong>of</strong> Ash<br />

Carbon<br />

Hydrogen<br />

Nitrogen<br />

Sulfur<br />

Ash<br />

Moisture<br />

He<strong>at</strong>ing Valve<br />

(8372 Btu/lb)<br />

52.65 3 Si02<br />

4.59 A1203<br />

0.75<br />

1.33<br />

Fe203<br />

Ti02<br />

9.7<br />

20.0<br />

p205<br />

CaO-<br />

19,459 J/g MgO<br />

Na20<br />

K20<br />

so3<br />

15.8<br />

12.1<br />

9.9<br />

0.8<br />

1 .o<br />

17.5<br />

6.2<br />

8.8<br />

0.0<br />

27.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r important consider<strong>at</strong>ions are <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustor and how opera-<br />

tional parameters affect <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed m<strong>at</strong>erial, sulfur retention on<br />

<strong>coal</strong> ash and bed m<strong>at</strong>erial, and he<strong>at</strong> transfer. The most important oper<strong>at</strong>ional para-<br />

meters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AFBC for <strong>the</strong> tests to be discussed here are listed in Table 2.<br />

Run Number<br />

Coal Type<br />

Bed M<strong>at</strong>erial<br />

Average Bed Temper<strong>at</strong>ure (OF)<br />

Superficial Gas Velocity (M/sec)<br />

Excess Air (%)<br />

Additive<br />

Ash Reinjection (%)<br />

Coal Feed R<strong>at</strong>e (kg/hr)<br />

TABLE 2. AFBC OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS<br />

21 81<br />

Beulah<br />

Quartz<br />

1467<br />

1.8<br />

25.49<br />

None<br />

None<br />

53<br />

2281<br />

Beulah<br />

Limestone<br />

1460<br />

2.0<br />

22.65<br />

*<br />

100<br />

57<br />

2481<br />

Beulah<br />

Limestone<br />

1450<br />

1.8<br />

24.38<br />

*<br />

100<br />

48<br />

*Addition <strong>of</strong> supplemental bed m<strong>at</strong>erial to maintain bed depth.<br />

The tendency for <strong>the</strong> bed to agglomer<strong>at</strong>e has been shown through extensive<br />

testing to depend on <strong>the</strong> following parameters:<br />

1. Bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure (higher temper<strong>at</strong>ure increases tendency)<br />

2. Coal sodium content (increased <strong>coal</strong> sodium content shows increased<br />

severity <strong>of</strong> agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion)<br />

175


3. Bed m<strong>at</strong>erial composition (high calcium content tends to delay, and decrease<br />

<strong>the</strong> severity <strong>of</strong> agglomer<strong>at</strong>es formed)<br />

4. Ash recycle (increased<br />

tendency)<br />

recycle <strong>of</strong> ash tends to increase agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

5. There appears to be a bed design parameter such as position <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> feed<br />

points, and distributor pl<strong>at</strong>e performance which affect bed m<strong>at</strong>erial agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

The bed m<strong>at</strong>erial used in baseline run 2181 was 10 mesh quartz sand. Upon<br />

startup <strong>the</strong> bed was sampled every eight hours for <strong>the</strong> dur<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 69 hour run.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> run <strong>the</strong> system was cooled and opened to expose <strong>the</strong> inside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

combustor. The bed m<strong>at</strong>erial was removed and several agglomer<strong>at</strong>es were found,<br />

which varied in size and shape, with <strong>the</strong> largest having a diameter <strong>of</strong> 6 cm. These<br />

agglomer<strong>at</strong>es were found both free flo<strong>at</strong>ing in <strong>the</strong> bed and <strong>at</strong>tached to <strong>the</strong> inside<br />

wall <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustor.<br />

The limestone bed m<strong>at</strong>erial was tested in run 2281 using 100% ash reinjection<br />

for a dur<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> 73 hours. The bed was sampled in <strong>the</strong> same manner as 2181.<br />

The form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> agglomer<strong>at</strong>es in <strong>the</strong> run was very minimal with no major agglomer-<br />

<strong>at</strong>es found. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, run 2481 which used a limestone bed ran for 160<br />

hours with 100% ash reinjection and had severe problems with agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion. After<br />

<strong>the</strong> run numerous agglomer<strong>at</strong>es were found loose in <strong>the</strong> bed. In addition, a large<br />

agglomer<strong>at</strong>e was found on top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distributor pl<strong>at</strong>e <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combus-<br />

tor. The agglomer<strong>at</strong>e had dimensions <strong>of</strong> 30.5 cm X 30.5 cm X 12.5 cm; it weighed<br />

10 kg and covered 30% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distributor pl<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

The bed m<strong>at</strong>erial and agglomer<strong>at</strong>es were characterized by polished thin section<br />

study, polarized light microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy/microprobe<br />

(SEM) - both secondary electron (SEI) and backsc<strong>at</strong>ter electron (BEl) images were<br />

used. Bulk samples were analyzed by x-ray diffraction and x-ray fluorescence.<br />

The goals in characterizing <strong>the</strong> bed m<strong>at</strong>erial and agglomer<strong>at</strong>es are to identify <strong>the</strong><br />

stages which lead to agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion and possibly postul<strong>at</strong>e a mechanism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir forma-<br />

tion to <strong>the</strong>reby determine methods and procedures to control <strong>the</strong>ir growth.<br />

Quartz Bed Agglomer<strong>at</strong>es<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> quartz bed m<strong>at</strong>erial is typified by run 2181 utilizing high-Na<br />

Beulah lignite and ash injection. Samples <strong>of</strong> bed m<strong>at</strong>erial taken <strong>at</strong> various intervals<br />

during <strong>the</strong> run are illustr<strong>at</strong>ed in Figures 1 to 11 with chemical analyses d<strong>at</strong>a given<br />

in Table 3. The following four stages can be used to summarize <strong>the</strong> agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

process :<br />

Stage 1. Initial ash co<strong>at</strong>ing.<br />

Initial samples <strong>of</strong> bed m<strong>at</strong>erial have a fine co<strong>at</strong>ing, about 50 microns thick,<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> sulf<strong>at</strong>ed aluminosilic<strong>at</strong>e particles (Figure 1). The co<strong>at</strong>ings contain some<br />

coarser ash m<strong>at</strong>erials in <strong>the</strong> outer parts and <strong>the</strong> inner parts have penetr<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>the</strong><br />

quartz grains slightly along gently curved or cusp<strong>at</strong>e embayments. The quartz<br />

grains are extensively fractured, apparently as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal stresses.<br />

Stage 2. Thickened nodular co<strong>at</strong>ings.<br />

Longer bed usage results in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> thicker ash co<strong>at</strong>ings about<br />

100 - 300 microns thick with nodular outer surfaces resulting from incorpor<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

larger ash particles (Figure 2). Sulf<strong>at</strong>ing, shown by lighter colored areas in <strong>the</strong><br />

SEM photographs, is common within both <strong>the</strong> finer and coarser ash particles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

co<strong>at</strong>ing.<br />

176


\: Stage 3. Sulf<strong>at</strong>ed ash-cemented agglomer<strong>at</strong>es.<br />

In this stage <strong>the</strong> quartz grains are loosely held toge<strong>the</strong>r by a cement <strong>of</strong><br />

sulf<strong>at</strong>ed aluminosilic<strong>at</strong>e ash (Figure 3). Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> quartz grains by fine<br />

grained ash is more extensive.<br />

Stage 4. Glass-cemented agglomer<strong>at</strong>es.<br />

'<br />

1<br />

In <strong>the</strong> final stage quartz grains are bonded by sulf<strong>at</strong>ed ash which has<br />

partly melted and crystallized through reaction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hot ash and <strong>the</strong> quartz<br />

grains. Resultant cooled agglomer<strong>at</strong>es consist <strong>of</strong> quartz grains <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed m<strong>at</strong>erial<br />

, ' bonded by a mixture <strong>of</strong> sulf<strong>at</strong>ed ash and Ca-rich, S-poor glass (Figure 41, with an<br />

intermedi<strong>at</strong>e reaction zone made up <strong>of</strong> an S-depleted, Si-enriched ash portion with a<br />

fringe <strong>of</strong> melilite or augite crystals projecting into <strong>the</strong> glass (Figures 5 and 6).<br />

Some quartz grains are partly melted and/or recrystallized to cristobalite or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

, phases.<br />

Limestone Bed Agglomer<strong>at</strong>es<br />

Agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> limestone bed m<strong>at</strong>erial appears to be dependent on ash deposi-<br />

tion and sulf<strong>at</strong>ion combined with extensive reaction and deterior<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

m<strong>at</strong>erial.<br />

Ash buildup on <strong>the</strong> grains and sulf<strong>at</strong>ing is comparable to reactions th<strong>at</strong> occur<br />

with <strong>the</strong> quartz bed m<strong>at</strong>erial. However, <strong>the</strong> limestone grains appear to undergo <strong>the</strong><br />

following reactions:<br />

1. Loss <strong>of</strong> CO, and conversion to CaO with addition <strong>of</strong> S, Fe, Na and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

elements. These reactions produce concentric alter<strong>at</strong>ion zones, high Ca and S con-<br />

tents and <strong>the</strong> reddish color th<strong>at</strong> characterizes typical grains (Figure 7).<br />

2. Continued reaction produces thicker sulf<strong>at</strong>ed ash co<strong>at</strong>ings and more thor-<br />

oughly altered bed grains.<br />

3. Bed grains disintegr<strong>at</strong>e extensively and become mixed with ash co<strong>at</strong>ings<br />

producing a weakly bonded agglomer<strong>at</strong>e consisting <strong>of</strong> masses <strong>of</strong> sulf<strong>at</strong>ed ash and<br />

altered limestone bed grains and fragments (Figure 8). The altered limestone ap-<br />

pears to recrystallize to coarse crystals <strong>of</strong> anhydrite in a fine-grained m<strong>at</strong>rix con-<br />

taining abundant Ca, S and Si (Figure 9). O<strong>the</strong>r phases, not yet identified, occur<br />

in <strong>the</strong> limestone agglomer<strong>at</strong>es including crystalline Fe-Ca oxides as shown in Figure<br />

IO, and o<strong>the</strong>r iron-rich zones and co<strong>at</strong>ings.<br />

Where quartz and limestone bed m<strong>at</strong>erials are combined mutual interactions pro-<br />

duce reaction zones on <strong>the</strong> quartz containing secondary needles <strong>of</strong> an unknown<br />

calcium silic<strong>at</strong>e mineral (Figure 11).<br />

Bulk x-ray diffraction analyses were performed on <strong>the</strong> bed m<strong>at</strong>erial agglomer-<br />

<strong>at</strong>es to identify <strong>the</strong> phases present. The crystaline phases found in <strong>the</strong> quartz bed<br />

agglomer<strong>at</strong>es from run 2181 include quartz, a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> series Ca2AI2SiO7-<br />

Ca2Mg2Si07 which includes melilite, and CaS04. The major phases identified in <strong>the</strong><br />

limestone bed agglomer<strong>at</strong>e are CaS04, CaSi04 and CaO. This d<strong>at</strong>a supports <strong>the</strong> SEM<br />

microprobe d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

X-ray fluorescence analysis was performed on bed m<strong>at</strong>erial sampled continually<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> run to determine <strong>the</strong> changes in composition <strong>of</strong> major ash constitu-<br />

ents. The most appreciable changes which occurred in <strong>the</strong> quartz bed run were:<br />

SiO, decreased from 95 to 47% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed because <strong>of</strong> dilution; SO3 increased to 243,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> adsorption by alkali constituents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> ash in <strong>the</strong> bed; CaO<br />

increased to 11% and Na20 increased to 7% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed. The CaO and NazO reacted<br />

with <strong>the</strong> SO3 and adhered to <strong>the</strong> quartz grains <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed. Al2O3, Fez03 and MgO<br />

remained rel<strong>at</strong>ively constant throughout <strong>the</strong> run after <strong>the</strong> initial eight hours. The<br />

17 7


components <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> limestone bed <strong>of</strong> run 2481 changed as follows: CaO decreased by 1<br />

dilution to 37% by <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> ash; SO3 increased to 28% by adsorption; and Na20<br />

increased to 7.7% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed. Si02, A1203, Fez03 and MgO remained constant<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> run after <strong>the</strong> initial eight hours.<br />

The concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> alumina and silica remain constant during <strong>the</strong> run<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>ing th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> aluminosilic<strong>at</strong>e clay particles leave <strong>the</strong> bed during combustion.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> calcium oxide and sodium oxide which largely origin<strong>at</strong>e from<br />

<strong>the</strong> organic structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lignite are free to react with <strong>the</strong> SO2 and bed m<strong>at</strong>erial<br />

increasing <strong>the</strong>ir concentr<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

OXIDE A<br />

Si02 10.76<br />

A1203 11.70<br />

FeO 4.82<br />

MgO 5.71<br />

CaO 18.11<br />

Na20 12.70<br />

so3 34.45<br />

TABLE 3. CHEMICAL ANALYSIS DATA FOR FIGURE 1 TO 11.<br />

WT. %<br />

OXIDE H I<br />

B<br />

12.45<br />

11.20<br />

0.55<br />

1 .I4<br />

32.86<br />

3.99<br />

37.25<br />

Si02 15.50 19.66<br />

A1203 10.28 0.15<br />

FeO 0.75 0.37<br />

MgO 3.84 0.09<br />

CaO 40.45 53.36<br />

Na20 1.91 1.74<br />

so3 21.49 24.39<br />

C D<br />

8.22 12.16<br />

18.94 8.94<br />

6.94 3.02<br />

11.86 5.73<br />

12.63 12.83<br />

10.14 17.97<br />

30.80 38.27<br />

E F G<br />

31 .EO 47.80 48.32<br />

19.13 10.03 10.61<br />

13.14 9.95 9.48<br />

10.27 4.44 6.26<br />

19.82 20.28 20.29<br />

2.04 6.11 3.73<br />

3.39 0.43 0.52<br />

J K L M<br />

12.39 1.81 0.89 31.50<br />

5.13 5.91 1.87 8.20<br />

1.15 0.32 81.69 0.56<br />

0.93 0.17 0.91 0.00<br />

44.23 39.58 13.55 44.19<br />

0.78 0.40 0.00 2.76<br />

35.37 51.66 6.33 11.89<br />

CONCLUSIONS I<br />

Agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed m<strong>at</strong>erial can be manifested in many different ways<br />

depending on <strong>the</strong> chemical composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed. The elements which have a ma-<br />

jor effect are sodium, calcium and sulfur which react with <strong>the</strong> bed m<strong>at</strong>erial possibly<br />

forming possibly a molten phase. This phase causes o<strong>the</strong>r ash constituents to ad-<br />

here to <strong>the</strong> bed particles. As this phenomenon reoccurs many times, agglomer<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

becomes more severe.<br />

REFERENCE<br />

1. Goblirsch, G.M., Vander Molen, R.H., and Hajicek, D.R., AFBC Testing <strong>of</strong><br />

North Dakota Lignite, Sixth Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Fluidized Bed Conference, Atlanta,<br />

Georgia, April, 1980.<br />

178


I<br />

FIG. 1. Initial ash co<strong>at</strong>ing on quartz<br />

bed m<strong>at</strong>erial. SEM/BEI image. Analysis<br />

A (Table 3). Run 2181, 40 hrs.<br />

FIG. 3. Quartz bed grains loosely ce-<br />

mented by sulf<strong>at</strong>ed aluminosilic<strong>at</strong>e ash.<br />

SEM/BEI image. Analysis D given in Table<br />

3. Run 2181, 69 hrs.<br />

173<br />

FIG. 2. Thickened nodular ash co<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

on quartz bed m<strong>at</strong>erial. SEM/BEI image.<br />

Analysis B <strong>of</strong> fine light sulf<strong>at</strong>ed ash<br />

and C <strong>of</strong> darker interior <strong>of</strong> coarser ash<br />

particle (Table 3). Run 2181, 54 hrs.<br />

FIG. 4. Quartz bed agglomer<strong>at</strong>e bonded by<br />

altered sulf<strong>at</strong>ed ash, bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dot-<br />

ted boundary (analysis E); Ca-rich, S-<br />

poor glass, top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dashed line (analy-<br />

sis F); and intermedi<strong>at</strong>e fringe <strong>of</strong> meli-<br />

lite or augite crystals. SEM/BEI image.<br />

Run 2181, 69 hrs.


FIG. 5. Transmitted light image (partially<br />

crossed polars) <strong>of</strong> lower center <strong>of</strong><br />

Figure 4 showing light quartz grain, gray<br />

glass, and crystals <strong>of</strong> melilite or augite<br />

crystals projecting into glass. Run 2181,<br />

G9 hrs.<br />

FIG. 7. Concentric alter<strong>at</strong>ion zones and<br />

reacted limestone bed m<strong>at</strong>erial. Analysis<br />

H given in Table 3. SEM/BEI image. Run<br />

2481, 169 hrs.<br />

180<br />

FIG. 6. Detail <strong>of</strong> lower center <strong>of</strong> Figure<br />

5, showing dendritic crystal form <strong>of</strong> melilite<br />

or augite. Analysis G given in<br />

Table 3.<br />

hrs.<br />

SEM/SEI image. Run 2181, 69<br />

FIG. 8. Weakly bonded agglomer<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sul-<br />

f<strong>at</strong>ed ash and altered limestone bed grains<br />

and fragments. Analysis I and J are given<br />

in Table 3. SCM/BEI image. Run 2481, 169<br />

hrs.


FIG 9. Limestone bed m<strong>at</strong>erial altered<br />

to coarse crystals <strong>of</strong> Cas04 in a finegrained<br />

m<strong>at</strong>rix <strong>of</strong> Ca, S, and Si. Light<br />

area to left is ash co<strong>at</strong>ing. Analysis K<br />

given in Table 3. SEM/BEI image. Run<br />

2481, 169 hrs.<br />

181<br />

FIG. 10. Bladed crystals <strong>of</strong> Fe-Ca oxides<br />

in limestone agglomer<strong>at</strong>e. Ash co<strong>at</strong>ing to<br />

right. Analysis L given in Table 3. SEM/<br />

BE1 image. Run 2481, 169 hrs.<br />

FIG. 11. Reaction zone consisting <strong>of</strong> sec-<br />

ondary needles <strong>of</strong> an unknown Ca-silic<strong>at</strong>e<br />

mineral on a quartz grain contained in<br />

<strong>the</strong> limestone bed. Analysis M given in<br />

Table 3. SEM/BEI image. Run 2481, 169<br />

hrs.


Experimental Research on Lignite Fluidized Bed Combustion<br />

Yang Min-Shin, Yang Li-Dan, Bao Yi-Lin, Chin Yu-Kun<br />

Burning Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Liqnite Fuel<br />

Harbin Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

The People's Republic <strong>of</strong> China<br />

Lignite fuel is highly vol<strong>at</strong>ile and has a low ignition temper<strong>at</strong>ure, and is<br />

consequently easy to burn. In practice, however, when burning low grade lignite<br />

fuel in stokers or pulverized <strong>coal</strong> furnaces, some difficulties may occur due to<br />

high moisture content and low ash fusing point.<br />

In general, <strong>the</strong> moisture content<br />

<strong>of</strong> lignite fuel is above 30% and <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> moisture content and ash content<br />

is higher than 50%. Its he<strong>at</strong>ing value is about 2,000-2,500 kcal/kg and <strong>the</strong> ash-<br />

deform<strong>at</strong>ion temper<strong>at</strong>ure is higher than 1,100 C.<br />

Burning lignite fuel in fluidized beds has many obvious advantages:<br />

(1) High he<strong>at</strong> accumul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fuel bed. This provides a sufficient he<strong>at</strong><br />

source to dry and prehe<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> lignite and helps high moisture lignite to ignite<br />

in time, resulting in a stable combustion condition.<br />

As an example, a factory installed a fluidized-bed boiler with steam capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> 10 t/hr. During <strong>the</strong> first winter <strong>of</strong> boiler oper<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>the</strong> air required for<br />

combustion was delivered into <strong>the</strong> furnace by drawing in outside air, which was<br />

approxim<strong>at</strong>ely -3OOC. In order to prevent <strong>the</strong> frozen <strong>coal</strong> from partially melting<br />

into a large lump in <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> bunker, <strong>the</strong> bunkers were installed outdoors.<br />

<strong>the</strong> winter, frozen <strong>coal</strong>, toge<strong>the</strong>r with ice particles, was delivered directly into<br />

<strong>the</strong> furnace via belts. The walls became covered with ice frost like <strong>the</strong> outside<br />

<strong>of</strong> a refriger<strong>at</strong>or. Despite such difficult conditions, <strong>the</strong> combustion process in<br />

<strong>the</strong> furnace was normal and <strong>the</strong> combustion was stable as long as <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fuel bed was above 60OoC.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r factory trial successfully fired three lignites with high moisture<br />

content. The measured characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fuels are given in Table 1.<br />

Table 1. Typical Analysis <strong>of</strong> Lignites Fired in Trials<br />

Type I I1 I11<br />

Moisture content as fired (%) 27.21 46.01 56.82<br />

Ash content as fired (%) 26.2 23.37 16.13<br />

Vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter as fired (%) 24.1 19.83 14.91<br />

Fixed carbon (%I 22.4 10.43 12.14<br />

Lower he<strong>at</strong>ing value (kcal/kg) 2551 1470 1230<br />

(2) The normal temper<strong>at</strong>ure range for fluidized beds is 850-950°C. This is<br />

much lower than <strong>the</strong> lignite ash-deform<strong>at</strong>ion point, and <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure field is<br />

even, with no possibility <strong>of</strong> slagging.<br />

Ouring<br />

(3) Ash erosion is not usually high. This is because <strong>the</strong> fly-ash particles<br />

flying out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed are not subjected to temper<strong>at</strong>ures above <strong>the</strong>ir fusion<br />

point. Thus <strong>the</strong> erosion potential <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fly-ash is probably lower than th<strong>at</strong> leaving<br />

conventional furnaces.<br />

182


(4) Since <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing temper<strong>at</strong>ure for a lignite fluidized bed boiler may<br />

be rel<strong>at</strong>ively low, <strong>the</strong> load range can be much wider. As <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

fluidized bed varies from 6OO0C to 900°C, <strong>the</strong> load range for a single fluidized<br />

bed can be easily varied from 50% to 100%.<br />

Using a separ<strong>at</strong>ed fluidized bed<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>the</strong> minimum load can be fur<strong>the</strong>r reduced, resulting in a much lower<br />

value than <strong>the</strong> low load stable oper<strong>at</strong>ing range <strong>of</strong> a pulverized-<strong>coal</strong> furnace.<br />

(5) The erosion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> submerged tubes in lignite fluidized-bed boilers is<br />

not serious due to <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ively loose character <strong>of</strong> lignite ash. In most fluidized<br />

bed boilers oper<strong>at</strong>ed for many years, <strong>the</strong> erosion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> submerged tubes has not been<br />

a problem, although <strong>the</strong>re may be some exceptions.<br />

(6) The specific gravity <strong>of</strong> lignite ash is rel<strong>at</strong>ively low. For this reason<br />

<strong>the</strong> air pressure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plenum may have a lower value than when using high<br />

low-grade <strong>coal</strong>s. The plenum air is usually supplied <strong>at</strong> a pressure <strong>of</strong> 500mm<br />

w<strong>at</strong>er.<br />

(7) It's easier to ignite a lignite fluidized-bed boiler. We have ignited<br />

run <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mine (ROM) lignite fuel successfully many times when <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> fuel bed was about 40OoC.<br />

(8) When lignite fuel is thrown into <strong>the</strong> high-temper<strong>at</strong>ure fuel beds, <strong>the</strong> fuel<br />

is suddenly he<strong>at</strong>ed and crumbles easily by itself, allowing <strong>coal</strong> particles as-fired<br />

to be very coarse. Oper<strong>at</strong>ing experiments in Heilang Jiang and Yunnan provinces<br />

also proved th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum diameter <strong>of</strong> particles may be raised to 20-25 mm,<br />

slightly reducing power consumption for crushing and making it easier to sieve.<br />

Fluidized Bed Boilers with a Rear-Installed Cyclone Furnace<br />

At present, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main problems for existing fluidized-bed boilers is<br />

low combustion efficiency. The main reason for lower combustion efficiency and<br />

higher unburned combustible solids losses is <strong>the</strong> high carbon content in <strong>the</strong> fly-ash.<br />

The small particles may be blown <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> high-temper<strong>at</strong>ure fluidized bed, resulting<br />

in an unburned carbon loss in <strong>the</strong> fly-ash.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r important characteristic <strong>of</strong> lignite fuel is its high vol<strong>at</strong>ile content.<br />

The he<strong>at</strong> released from <strong>the</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter is about one-half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

value. In addition, lignite particles may break up during <strong>the</strong> burning process,<br />

forming many small <strong>coal</strong> particles. Therefore, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> important characteristics<br />

for firing lignite in fluidized-bed boilers is possibly th<strong>at</strong> more vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter<br />

and small <strong>coal</strong> particles are burning in <strong>the</strong> suspension chamber (freeboard).<br />

The optimiz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion process in <strong>the</strong> suspension chamber to obtain<br />

better performance is an important factor in determining <strong>the</strong> combustion efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> lignite fluidized-bed boilers. One effective measure for reducing <strong>the</strong> fly-ash<br />

carbon content is using a fly-ash recycle for refiring in <strong>the</strong> fluidized beds or<br />

applying fly-ash refiring beds. However, this will complic<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> system and its<br />

construction for small-capacity, fluidized-bed boilers. Practically, providing<br />

high temper<strong>at</strong>ure within <strong>the</strong> suspension chamber (freeboard) may exert an afterburning<br />

actior! for various fuels. For this reason, we suggest limiting <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong> exchange<br />

surface as much as possible or not placing <strong>the</strong>m in <strong>the</strong> freeboard. This will raise <strong>the</strong><br />

gas temper<strong>at</strong>ure in <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> furnace as high as possible. The ignition<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure for lignite fuel is rel<strong>at</strong>ively low. Thus, <strong>the</strong> increased temper<strong>at</strong>ure will<br />

exert sufficient afterburning action on <strong>the</strong> suspension chamber (freeboard).<br />

Providing<br />

a sufficiently high temper<strong>at</strong>ure in <strong>the</strong> suspension chamber is an important condition<br />

in achieving better combustion.<br />

183


Ano<strong>the</strong>r important condition is how to organize <strong>the</strong> aerodynamic field <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> /<br />

suspension chamber. In 1972, we designed a fluidized-bed boiler with a rear-installed<br />

cyclone furnace, shown in Fig. 1. Good results were obtained. Afterwards, we<br />

designed several dozen fluidized-bed boilers for lignite, <strong>the</strong> majority using<br />

rear-installed cyclone furnaces. The design <strong>of</strong> this cyclone furnace is based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> a horizontal cyclone furnace. The aerodynamic field for a<br />

cyclone furnace is very complex. Its complexity assists in sufficient mixing <strong>of</strong><br />

combustibles and oxygen in <strong>the</strong> gas flow. This is due to <strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

velocity between <strong>the</strong> gas flow and <strong>the</strong> fly-ash and thus an increase in <strong>the</strong> diffusion<br />

velocity <strong>of</strong> oxygen to <strong>the</strong> fly-ash. These effects result in an increased burning<br />

velocity for <strong>coal</strong> particles. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> residence time for fly-ash in <strong>the</strong><br />

cyclone furnace is obviously prolonged. This is especially true for ash particles<br />

having a medium diameter. The carbon content for this part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fly-ash, in<br />

general, gives <strong>the</strong> highest value. In addition, a cyclone furnace collects dust within<br />

<strong>the</strong> furnace. It may reduce erosion on <strong>the</strong> convection he<strong>at</strong>ing surfaces and reduce<br />

<strong>the</strong> load on <strong>the</strong> dust-collecting plants.<br />

(<br />

/<br />

I<br />

Note th<strong>at</strong> although <strong>the</strong> dimension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> convex collar for cyclone furnace<br />

outlets is not large, its effect on <strong>the</strong> aerodynamic field is quite important. The<br />

scheme for an aerodynamic field in a cyclone furnace with and without a collar is<br />

shown in Fig. 2. It was also shown by cold modeling th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> separ<strong>at</strong>ion efficiency<br />

for cyclone furnaces with collars is much higher than for those without collars.<br />

Aerodynamic Fields for Horizontal Cyclone Furnaces<br />

In order to recognize <strong>the</strong> mechanism for <strong>the</strong> separ<strong>at</strong>ing and afterburning action<br />

in <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace and to investig<strong>at</strong>e for a more reasonable construction, we have<br />

performed cold modeling for <strong>the</strong> horizontal cyclone furnace and tested <strong>the</strong> aerodynamic<br />

field in this type <strong>of</strong> furnace.<br />

,<br />

The maximum particle size leaving <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace is expressed by <strong>the</strong><br />

following rel<strong>at</strong>ionship:<br />

1.6<br />

dmax<br />

=<br />

w1.4 Ru2 v0.6<br />

13.88 9<br />

w;* R~ r<br />

where<br />

I -<br />

Wt -<br />

velocity in inlet <strong>of</strong> cyclone furnace (m/sec)<br />

'r<br />

R"<br />

r<br />

9<br />

v<br />

radial velocity (m/sec)<br />

=<br />

= radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exit (m)<br />

=<br />

3<br />

specific gravity <strong>of</strong> gas (kg/m )<br />

=<br />

2<br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> kinem<strong>at</strong>ic viscosity <strong>of</strong> gas, (m /sec)<br />

Ro<br />

r<br />

= radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower boundary <strong>of</strong> inlet (m)<br />

= specific gravity <strong>of</strong> particle (Kg/m 3 )<br />

From <strong>the</strong> above, we can approxim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> diameter <strong>of</strong> a particle in cyclonic<br />

motion <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> exit boundary <strong>of</strong> a cyclone furnace. Some large particles <strong>of</strong> diameter<br />

above d near <strong>the</strong> wall will be moved towards <strong>the</strong> wall and <strong>the</strong>n pass down <strong>the</strong> wall.<br />

The oth@Pxlarge Particles will continue <strong>the</strong>ir circumferential movements in various<br />

values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> radius until <strong>the</strong> wall is reached or <strong>the</strong>ir diameter is reduced to less<br />

than d . The particles <strong>of</strong> diameter less than d may be moving with <strong>the</strong> air flow<br />

out <strong>of</strong>metie CYlOne furnace, but <strong>the</strong> small particlevahear <strong>the</strong> wall may also be<br />

separ<strong>at</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> gas flow. Therefore, dmax may be considered as <strong>the</strong> limit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

184


I<br />

I<br />

maximum particle diameter leaving <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace. Because particles are not<br />

spherical d obtained from <strong>the</strong> above equ<strong>at</strong>ion should be divided by a coefficient<br />

4, called t!Bxparticle shape coefficient, as a correction. Only after this may <strong>the</strong><br />

value be considered as <strong>the</strong> actual size.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> cold modeling experiment, <strong>the</strong> above expression for dma gives a value<br />

<strong>of</strong> about 94 pm. Experimental measurements show a maximum particle &meter <strong>of</strong> 142<br />

W. If this value is corrected for particle sphericity (0 = .66) a value <strong>of</strong> 93.72<br />

W is found which is very close to d , from <strong>the</strong> above expression.<br />

For conditions typical <strong>of</strong> an oper<strong>at</strong>ing cyclone furnace, <strong>the</strong> maximum particle<br />

diameter leaving <strong>the</strong> furnace from <strong>the</strong> above equ<strong>at</strong>ion is about 320 m. For some<br />

factory furnaces <strong>the</strong> experimental value is about 500 pin. This is equivalent to a<br />

spherical diameter <strong>of</strong> 330 urn (+ = 0.66) which is close to 320 urn.<br />

Summarizing, <strong>the</strong> principal causes <strong>of</strong> afterburning action in cyclone furnaces arc?:<br />

(1) Large particles <strong>of</strong> fly-ash are thrown by <strong>the</strong> high centrifugal force toward<br />

<strong>the</strong> wall. These particles <strong>the</strong>n pass rapidly down <strong>the</strong> inner walls <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cyclone<br />

furnace. Although <strong>the</strong>se particles are separ<strong>at</strong>ed rapidly, due to <strong>the</strong> high rel<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

Velocity <strong>the</strong>y can be burned up within a short time. Since large particles have<br />

partially burned within <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed, <strong>the</strong> carbon content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se particles<br />

would not be as high.<br />

(2) Based on <strong>the</strong> above principle, medium particles will move around <strong>the</strong><br />

circumference with different radii until <strong>the</strong>y have burned to a size less than d ax<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n leave <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace. So <strong>the</strong> residence time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> medium particTes<br />

within <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace is gre<strong>at</strong>ly increased resulting in gre<strong>at</strong>er char combustion.<br />

In addition, <strong>the</strong> action <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> collar mounted <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> thro<strong>at</strong> forces <strong>the</strong> air<br />

flow <strong>at</strong> and around <strong>the</strong> thro<strong>at</strong> to change its direction repe<strong>at</strong>edly (rot<strong>at</strong>ing 180').<br />

This forms an intense turbulence and recircul<strong>at</strong>ing movement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particles (see<br />

Fig. 1). The l<strong>at</strong>ter recircul<strong>at</strong>es in <strong>the</strong> cyclone axially and <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> same time<br />

rot<strong>at</strong>es around <strong>the</strong> cyclone axis, also increasing <strong>the</strong> residence time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particles<br />

within <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace. Cold modeling has confirmed th<strong>at</strong> some medium-size<br />

particles are rot<strong>at</strong>ing continually within <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace until <strong>the</strong> fan is<br />

shut down.<br />

Based upon <strong>the</strong>oretical analysis and some experimental d<strong>at</strong>a from <strong>the</strong> domestic<br />

research unit, it has been found th<strong>at</strong> particles <strong>of</strong> medium size have <strong>the</strong> highest<br />

carbon content, and th<strong>at</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> particles is in <strong>the</strong> majority. For example,<br />

experimental d<strong>at</strong>a obtained in <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed boiler burning local <strong>coal</strong> <strong>at</strong><br />

Che-Jiang University has shown th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong> loss for particles ranging from<br />

0.13 to 0.375 mm is over 70% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total he<strong>at</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> fly-ash.<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se particles may be just <strong>the</strong> rot<strong>at</strong>ing particles within <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace.<br />

Therefore, <strong>the</strong> cyclonic action <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace may be very effective in<br />

reducing <strong>the</strong> carbon-content <strong>of</strong> fly-ash.<br />

Experimental Research on <strong>the</strong>.Cyclone Furnace Under Thermal St<strong>at</strong>e<br />

The carbon content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ash samples taken from various parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> boiler<br />

flue gas were determined and are summarized in <strong>the</strong> following table.<br />

185


Table 2. Ash Size Distribution and Carbon Content in<br />

Various Parts <strong>of</strong> Flue Gas<br />

_____<br />

Granularity Ash separ<strong>at</strong>ed in Ash in precipit<strong>at</strong>ing Ash in dust<br />

mm cyclone furnace chamber col 1 ector<br />

proportion carbon proportion carbon proportion carbon<br />

by weight content by weight content by weight content<br />

% % % % % %<br />

1.87 1.18<br />

1-2 5.83 1.76<br />

0.5-1 36.4 1.08 4.64<br />

0.28-0.5 25.8 1.3 15.4 18.48 1.25 35.86<br />

0.09-0.28 24.8 0.93 59.3 9.91 33 18.89<br />

0.09 5.2 1.05 20.66 4.12 65.18 8.53<br />

In a typical boiler, a two-stage dust collector is used. About 60% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total<br />

fly-ash is collected in <strong>the</strong> precipit<strong>at</strong>ing chamber. The remaining ash is <strong>the</strong>n removed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> dust collector. Based on <strong>the</strong> above d<strong>at</strong>a, we can draw <strong>the</strong> following conclusions:<br />

(1) The ash particle size in precipit<strong>at</strong>ing chambers and dust collectors is<br />

scarcely larger than 0.5 mm. It is reasonable to assume th<strong>at</strong> particles gre<strong>at</strong>er than<br />

0.5mm will not leave <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace. This is in accordance with <strong>the</strong> results<br />

from <strong>the</strong> cold modeling experiment.<br />

(2) Ash particles with diameters <strong>of</strong> 0.25 - 0.5mm in <strong>the</strong> fly-ash have <strong>the</strong><br />

highest carbon content. However, most <strong>of</strong> this fly-ash size fraction has been<br />

separ<strong>at</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> gas flow in <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace and its proportion by weight<br />

in <strong>the</strong> fly-ash is not high. When a boiler oper<strong>at</strong>es <strong>at</strong> normal capacity, <strong>the</strong> average<br />

carbon content for fly-ash is 11.85%. This value may be considered rel<strong>at</strong>ively low.<br />

(3) The ash particles separ<strong>at</strong>ing from <strong>the</strong> gas flow in <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace<br />

have a significantly lower carbon content than th<strong>at</strong> observed in <strong>the</strong> ash overflow.<br />

In general, <strong>the</strong> medium particles <strong>of</strong> fly-ash have higher carbon content, while <strong>the</strong><br />

carbon content <strong>of</strong> ash particles ranging from 0.28 to 0.5 mm separ<strong>at</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> cyclone<br />

furnace is only 1.3%. This shows th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> burn-up for ash separ<strong>at</strong>ed within<br />

cyclone furnaces is ra<strong>the</strong>r high.<br />

(4) Since <strong>the</strong> separ<strong>at</strong>ion efficiency for cyclone furnaces is ra<strong>the</strong>r high<br />

(about 50%), <strong>the</strong> ash particles burn more completely with <strong>the</strong> result th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> boiler<br />

combustion efficiency increases. During oper<strong>at</strong>ion periods <strong>at</strong> r<strong>at</strong>ed capacity, <strong>the</strong><br />

unburned combustible solid losses are 3.8% and <strong>the</strong> unburned gas losses are 0.67%<br />

while <strong>the</strong> combustion efficiency can be as high as 95.47%.<br />

When <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> fluidized bed section is 900°C <strong>at</strong> r<strong>at</strong>ed capacity, <strong>the</strong><br />

gas temper<strong>at</strong>ure measured <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace exit is 92OoC, th<strong>at</strong> is <strong>the</strong><br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure difference between <strong>the</strong> l<strong>at</strong>ter and <strong>the</strong> former is 2OoC. This shows th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>re are some combustibles still burning in <strong>the</strong> suspension chamber and in <strong>the</strong><br />

cyclone furnace. According to calcul<strong>at</strong>ions, <strong>the</strong> total fraction burned in <strong>the</strong><br />

suspension chamber and cyclone furnace is 0.3.<br />

In experimental tests with ano<strong>the</strong>r lignite fluidized bed boiler <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same<br />

type, <strong>the</strong> fraction burned in <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace itself was found to be 0.172.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a for <strong>the</strong> above two experiments are basically <strong>the</strong> same.<br />

It can be seen from <strong>the</strong> above summary th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> total fraction <strong>of</strong> combustion in<br />

186


!<br />

suspension chambers and cyclone furnaces in fluidized bed boilers is rel<strong>at</strong>ively high.<br />

Thus <strong>the</strong> organiz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion process is highly significant in obtaining<br />

better boiler combustion efficiency.<br />

The separ<strong>at</strong>ion efficiency for cyclone furnaces, 'If, is <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> ash<br />

separ<strong>at</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace, AG, to ash leaving <strong>the</strong> cyclone furnace, G", plus<br />

<strong>the</strong> ash separ<strong>at</strong>ed, AG, th<strong>at</strong> is<br />

AG x 100%<br />

nf = G"+aG<br />

The unburned carbon content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ash is included in <strong>the</strong> above expression. The<br />

results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tests are summarized in Table 3.<br />

Table 3. Separ<strong>at</strong>ion Efficiency for a Cyclone Furnace as a<br />

Function <strong>of</strong> Ash Particle Size<br />

Granularity mm >1 0.5-1 0.28-0.5 0.09-0.28


I<br />

Figure 1. Fluidized-Bed Boiler with Rear-Installed<br />

Cyclone Furnace<br />

collar<br />

Figure 2. Effect o f Collars on <strong>the</strong> Aerodynamic Field<br />

in a Cyclone Furnace: (a) With Collar.<br />

(b) Without Collar.<br />

ir.<br />

188


Pilot Plant <strong>of</strong> a Coal Fired Fluidized Bed Boiler in Japan<br />

S. Tamanuki<br />

The Coal Mining Research Center<br />

Kanda Jinbocho 2-10 Chiyoda-ku<br />

Tokyo, Japan<br />

H. Karayama, S . Kawada<br />

Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.<br />

Babcock-Hitachi K.K.<br />

A pilot plant <strong>of</strong> an <strong>at</strong>mospheric fluidized bed combustion boiler<br />

which is capable <strong>of</strong> evapor<strong>at</strong>ing 20 t/h <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> steam conditions <strong>of</strong><br />

60 <strong>at</strong>g and 540°C was constructed and started oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> begin-<br />

ning <strong>of</strong> April, 1981.<br />

A description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project and its results are presented in this<br />

paper.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Brief History <strong>of</strong> FBC -. Development in Japan<br />

The project named 'Research on Fluidized Bed Combustion Technology'<br />

was started in 1978 to support Japan's n<strong>at</strong>ional effort for <strong>coal</strong><br />

utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion technology development. This project has been financially<br />

supported by <strong>the</strong> government and steered by a joint committee <strong>of</strong> several<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ed agencies and companies. The Coal Mining Research Center has<br />

been filling <strong>the</strong> leading role in this committee since it was organized<br />

in 1978.<br />

During 1978 and 79 component tests and fundamental studies using<br />

bench scale units were performed. In parallel with <strong>the</strong>se a feasibility<br />

study for a 500 MW power gener<strong>at</strong>ion unit was carried out. The<br />

previously expected advantages <strong>of</strong> fluidized bed boilers over <strong>the</strong><br />

conventional pulverised <strong>coal</strong> combustors were examined. It has been<br />

found th<strong>at</strong> most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> advantages <strong>of</strong> fluidized bed combustion such as<br />

<strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> elimin<strong>at</strong>ing flue gas desulfuriz<strong>at</strong>ion and denitrific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

and <strong>the</strong> capability <strong>of</strong> handling wide range <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> types are<br />

still effective for Japanese social and economical situ<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

The whole program <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed boiler development is shown<br />

in Table 1. A pilot plant with a 20 t/h evapor<strong>at</strong>ion capacity was<br />

constructed in Wakam<strong>at</strong>su Thermal' Power Plant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Electric Power<br />

Development Co. and <strong>the</strong> test runs are performed for testing <strong>the</strong> instrument<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

and components and determining <strong>the</strong> optimum oper<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed boiler. A survey program on <strong>the</strong> design<br />

conditions for various components and devices for a 240 t/h class<br />

189


demonstr<strong>at</strong>ion plant is also running.<br />

Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

To carry out this project effectively, <strong>the</strong> pilot plant program<br />

Steering Committee was organized by The Coal Mining Research Center,<br />

Electric Power Development Co., Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. and<br />

Babcock-Hitachi K.K. As a sub-committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Steering Committee, <strong>the</strong><br />

Pilot Plant Executive Office was organized. This Office has taken<br />

charge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> construction, test and oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pilot plant.<br />

Wakam<strong>at</strong>su Pilot Plant Test Items<br />

The planned pilot plant test items are as follows:<br />

(1) NOx and SOX emission control<br />

(2) Reduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> required quantity <strong>of</strong> desulfurizing sorbent<br />

(3) Controllability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed boiler<br />

(4) Reliability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed boiler<br />

(5) Suitable types <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

(6) Performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dust collector<br />

2. 20 t/h Pilot Plant<br />

Basic Concepts<br />

-_<br />

The fluidized bed boiler consists <strong>of</strong> a main bed cell (MBC) and<br />

a carbon burn-up cell (CBC). The design was made so th<strong>at</strong> various<br />

imported <strong>coal</strong>s and low grade <strong>coal</strong>s can be burned.<br />

Crushed <strong>coal</strong> has been used as a feed <strong>coal</strong>. Before feeding, <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>coal</strong> is pretre<strong>at</strong>ed-drying, crushing screening, etc. Coal feeding is<br />

done by both pneum<strong>at</strong>ic feeders and overbed spreaders.<br />

Fine grain <strong>coal</strong> is fed to <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed through a pneum<strong>at</strong>ic<br />

conveyer and coarse grain <strong>coal</strong> sprinkled over <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed by a<br />

spreader. The capacity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> feeders are designed so th<strong>at</strong> total<br />

required quantity <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> can be fed by one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two method.<br />

N<strong>at</strong>ural limestone whose sizing has been completed <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> mine is used<br />

as a desulfurizing sorbent.<br />

conveyor.<br />

The sorbent is fed through a pneum<strong>at</strong>ic<br />

A multi-cyclone is installed <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> outlet <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MBC. The design<br />

was made so th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> collected <strong>coal</strong> ash can be reburned ei<strong>the</strong>r in MBC<br />

or CBC.<br />

A balanced draft systems is used.<br />

MBC was designed so th<strong>at</strong> it can be diveded into two parts. The<br />

install<strong>at</strong>ion position <strong>of</strong> he<strong>at</strong> exchange tubes in <strong>the</strong> free board <strong>of</strong> MBC<br />

can be changed. The duct connected to <strong>the</strong> rear flue can be removed so<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong> free board can be changed.<br />

Hot stoves and over bed burners are used for starting up <strong>the</strong><br />

boiler. Steam gener<strong>at</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> boiler is changed back to w<strong>at</strong>er by an<br />

air condenser. The w<strong>at</strong>er can be reused. Discharged ash is wetted and<br />

transferred to <strong>the</strong> ash yard to be discarded.<br />

190


After <strong>the</strong> fiscal year 1982, <strong>the</strong> following expansion or modific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

will be made.<br />

A. A sorbent regener<strong>at</strong>ion unit: applicable for both limestone and<br />

syn<strong>the</strong>tic sorbent.<br />

B. A new dust - collector for testing is planned for <strong>the</strong> dust discharge<br />

quantity 10 mg/Nm3, and for <strong>the</strong> gas flow r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely<br />

1,000 Nm3/h.<br />

Design Conditions<br />

(1) Main boiler specific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Boiler type: N<strong>at</strong>ural and forced circul<strong>at</strong>ion type drum<br />

boiler; indoor type.<br />

Evapor<strong>at</strong>ion: 20 t/h<br />

Steam pressure: 60 kg/cm2 G <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> outlet <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> superhe<strong>at</strong>er<br />

Steam temper<strong>at</strong>ure: 54OOC <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> outlet <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> superhe<strong>at</strong>er<br />

Feedw<strong>at</strong>er temper<strong>at</strong>ure: 133°C <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> inlet <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fuel economizer<br />

Boiler efficiency: 87.37% (high calorific value base)<br />

Fuel consumption: 2,450 kg/h (wet <strong>coal</strong> base)<br />

Fuel calorific value: 7,100 kcal/kg (high he<strong>at</strong>ing value for dry<br />

<strong>coal</strong>. )<br />

6,603 kcal/kg (high he<strong>at</strong>ing value for wet<br />

<strong>coal</strong><br />

Combustion flue gas: 20,293 rIm3/h (wet)<br />

(2) Target value <strong>of</strong> emission control<br />

SOX: 95% desulfuriz<strong>at</strong>ion for <strong>coal</strong> containing 3% S<br />

NOx: 60 ppm for <strong>coal</strong> containing 1% N and 02 6% equivalent.<br />

(3) Properties <strong>of</strong> planned <strong>coal</strong>: Refer to Table 2.<br />

(4) Desulfurizing sorbent: n<strong>at</strong>ural limestone an< syn<strong>the</strong>tic sorbent<br />

-~<br />

Plant Outline<br />

(1) Boiler<br />

Fig. 1 shows a section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> boiler elev<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

The MBC consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion furnace which is composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> a n<strong>at</strong>ural circul<strong>at</strong>ion membrane structure w<strong>at</strong>er wall and <strong>the</strong><br />

refactory wall rear flue. In <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed with a 2.17 m x<br />

4.34 m area, <strong>the</strong> forced circul<strong>at</strong>ion type evapor<strong>at</strong>or by a boiler<br />

circul<strong>at</strong>ing w<strong>at</strong>er pump and <strong>the</strong> primary and secondary superhe<strong>at</strong>ers<br />

are installed. The fluidized bed is divided into two parts so th<strong>at</strong><br />

one side oper<strong>at</strong>ion can be done.<br />

Outside <strong>the</strong> bed, <strong>the</strong> evapor<strong>at</strong>or and flue economizer are<br />

installed. This evapor<strong>at</strong>or, as shown in Fig. 2, can be removed to<br />

<strong>the</strong> free board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion furnace or rear flue. This,<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r with a change in <strong>the</strong> install<strong>at</strong>ion level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> duct<br />

connecting to <strong>the</strong> rear flue, enables <strong>the</strong> test for a change in free<br />

board conditions. In <strong>the</strong> free board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion furnace,<br />

double stage combustion air feeding ports (8 rows x 5 stages) are<br />

installed to enable various comparison tests to be conducted.<br />

CBC is composed <strong>of</strong> a n<strong>at</strong>ural circul<strong>at</strong>ion w<strong>at</strong>er wall (0.91 m x<br />

0.91 m). In <strong>the</strong> free board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CBC, a fuel economizer is<br />

191


installed.<br />

The height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> overflow is variable. Overflow ash is<br />

cooled by air. To monitor <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure distribution in <strong>the</strong><br />

fluidized bed and <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure behavior in <strong>the</strong> major parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> boiler tubes, tens <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmocouples are installed and<br />

connected to a d<strong>at</strong>a processor evalu<strong>at</strong>e and analyse <strong>the</strong> test<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions and performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> boiler.<br />

(2) Coal and Limestone Feeder<br />

The <strong>coal</strong> charged into <strong>the</strong> feed <strong>coal</strong> hopper is temporalily<br />

stored in <strong>the</strong> feed <strong>coal</strong> bunker and sent to <strong>the</strong> dryer to remove<br />

moisture, <strong>the</strong>n crushed screened for classific<strong>at</strong>ion into fine and<br />

coarse fractions <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

The <strong>coal</strong> dryer <strong>of</strong> an indirect steam he<strong>at</strong>ing type.<br />

Coal is crushed in two stages before drying. Limestone whose<br />

grain size has been adjusted <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> mine is used and supplied into<br />

MBC toge<strong>the</strong>r with fine grain <strong>coal</strong> through pneum<strong>at</strong>ic conveying.<br />

(3) Instrument<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

The instrument<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> this plant consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> boiler<br />

control system, a centralized oper<strong>at</strong>ion monitoring system and a<br />

precessing system. The d<strong>at</strong>a fur<strong>the</strong>r can be displayed on <strong>the</strong> color<br />

CRT screen.<br />

(4)' Ash handling Equipment<br />

Ash discharged from <strong>the</strong> overflow pipe <strong>of</strong> MBC and CBC is<br />

cooled and sent to <strong>the</strong> overflow tank, <strong>the</strong>n sent to <strong>the</strong> ash storage<br />

silo by <strong>the</strong> pneum<strong>at</strong>ic conveyer system.<br />

3. Present St<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Test<br />

Outline <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion up to June, 1981 toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with several examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion d<strong>at</strong>a are as follows:<br />

(1) Oper<strong>at</strong>ion Results<br />

Since <strong>coal</strong> feeding started in early May, 1981, oper<strong>at</strong>ion time<br />

has accumul<strong>at</strong>ed to 628 hours by September, 1981. Taiheiyo <strong>coal</strong>,<br />

typical low sulfur non swelling bituminous <strong>coal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Japan, is<br />

currently used. Properties <strong>of</strong> this <strong>coal</strong> and limestone are shown<br />

in Table 3 and Table 4 respectively.<br />

The size <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> is -6 mm and <strong>the</strong> average particle diameter<br />

is about 2.5 mm. The limestone size is -3 mm.<br />

Up to now so far, 10 cold starts and 17 hot starts have been<br />

carried out.<br />

(2) Oper<strong>at</strong>ion D<strong>at</strong>a<br />

Table 5 shows an example <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion d<strong>at</strong>a. In <strong>the</strong> Table,<br />

<strong>the</strong> NOx values are from <strong>the</strong> single stage and two stage combustion.<br />

These values are sufficiently low compared to <strong>the</strong> values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

government regul<strong>at</strong>ion. The SOX value is for <strong>the</strong> present low S<br />

<strong>coal</strong>. The desulfuriz<strong>at</strong>ion performance will be checked by using<br />

medium S <strong>coal</strong> in l<strong>at</strong>er test.<br />

192


MBC CBC<br />

Fig. 1 Boiler Structure<br />

193


Fig. 2. Possible configul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> free board and tube arrangement<br />

Fiscal year<br />

Preliminary study<br />

Feasibility study<br />

500 MW plant<br />

20 t/h pilot plant<br />

240 t/h dernon-<br />

str<strong>at</strong>ion plant<br />

(75 MW class)<br />

in 20 t/h Fluidized Bed Boiler<br />

ri<br />

Test Module<br />

Table 1. Fluidized Bed Boiler Development Program<br />

194


\<br />

i<br />

Table 2. Coal Properties<br />

Planned <strong>coal</strong> I<br />

7100 I<br />

Table 4. Properties <strong>of</strong> Limestone<br />

urface moisture<br />

Moisture 1%)<br />

Analysis<br />

Ash 1%)<br />

~~<br />

Vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter 1%)<br />

55.38<br />

Fixed carbon (%I<br />

0.30<br />

u<br />

c<br />

C 1%)<br />

m c<br />

0.28<br />

H 1%)<br />

E<br />

0.03<br />

N 1%)<br />

U 0<br />

0.10<br />

0 1%) 11.0<br />

0.90<br />

Total sulfure 1%)<br />

Table 3. PrOpertlcS Of Coal<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> 1 Taiheiyo cosy<br />

High He<strong>at</strong>ing Value lKcal/kgl<br />

Surface moisture 1%)<br />

Moisture 1%)<br />

Ash 1%)<br />

Vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter 1%)<br />

Fixed carbon (81<br />

C 10)<br />

H I01<br />

N 1%)<br />

0 1%)<br />

Combustible s I81<br />

Incombustible S 1%)<br />

195<br />

6330<br />

1 .6<br />

3.0<br />

15.3<br />

44.2<br />

37.5<br />

64.1<br />

5 .e<br />

0.8<br />

13.4<br />

0.1<br />

0.1


INTRODUCTION<br />

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF COAL-FIRED<br />

FLUIDIZED-BED BOILER<br />

Bao Dong-wen and Ruan Yi-shao<br />

Research and Development Division<br />

Dong-fang Boiler Works<br />

Zigong, Shichuan, China<br />

The power industry in many countries is now facing a problem: how to achieve<br />

<strong>the</strong> inevitable shift from oil and n<strong>at</strong>ural gas to <strong>coal</strong> and low-grade <strong>coal</strong>s<br />

while remaining in compliance with <strong>the</strong> regul<strong>at</strong>ory limits on emissions.<br />

Fluidized-bed combustion (FBC) has demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed its potential to solve this<br />

problem, because it has <strong>the</strong> advantages <strong>of</strong> adaptability to low-grade <strong>coal</strong>s and<br />

feasibility for sulfur emissions control. Due to FBC's rel<strong>at</strong>ively low com-<br />

bustion temper<strong>at</strong>ures, NOx emissions from a fluidized bed are lower than those<br />

from conventional furnaces.<br />

As a new technology it is n<strong>at</strong>ural th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are many technical problems to be<br />

investig<strong>at</strong>ed and difficulties to be overcome in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong><br />

fluidized-bed boilers (FBB).<br />

Since 1971, Dong-fang Boiler Works (DBW) has carried out developmental work in<br />

FBB in <strong>the</strong> following areas:<br />

o Combustion efficieacy.<br />

o Arrangement <strong>of</strong> floidized-bed he<strong>at</strong>ing surfaces.<br />

o Immersed superhe<strong>at</strong>er.<br />

0 Erosion <strong>of</strong> immersed tubes.<br />

o Start-up <strong>of</strong> fluidized bed.<br />

A 463 x 324 mm FBC test unit was built to investig<strong>at</strong>e methods <strong>of</strong> improving<br />

<strong>the</strong> combustion efficiency <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FBB. L<strong>at</strong>er, a 24 t/h stoker-fired boiler<br />

was converted into an FBB by DBW. It has now been successfully oper<strong>at</strong>ed for<br />

196


-2-<br />

more than 3 years, since 1977. The performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unit has been s<strong>at</strong>isfactory<br />

to <strong>the</strong> user. Figure 1 shows <strong>the</strong> general arrangement <strong>of</strong> this modified<br />

boiler. Its major parameters are as follows:<br />

Steam capacity 24 t/h 2<br />

Steam pressure<br />

Superhe<strong>at</strong>ed steam<br />

32 kg/cm<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure 45OEC<br />

Feed w<strong>at</strong>er temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

Gas temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>at</strong><br />

150 C<br />

boiler exit 20o0c<br />

Designed fuel Bituminous <strong>coal</strong><br />

N<strong>at</strong>ural circul<strong>at</strong>ion was adopted for <strong>the</strong> immersed evapor<strong>at</strong>ing surface. To<br />

d<strong>at</strong>e no problem in w<strong>at</strong>er circul<strong>at</strong>ion has occurred. An experimental immersed<br />

superhe<strong>at</strong>er was placed in <strong>the</strong> bed and its behavior observed. For distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> combustion air, a refractory covered bubble cap pl<strong>at</strong>e was installed.<br />

In order to facilit<strong>at</strong>e bed start-up and load changes, <strong>the</strong> windbox was divided<br />

into four separ<strong>at</strong>e compartments. Because bituminous <strong>coal</strong> was to be used, no<br />

carbon recycling was considered; thus <strong>the</strong> uncertainty <strong>of</strong> a recycle system was<br />

avoided. The once-through combustion efficiency (i.e.,<br />

elutri<strong>at</strong>ed fines) was measured as 94.8 to 95.5 percent.<br />

without reburning <strong>of</strong><br />

TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

A- Combustion Efficiency<br />

When compared with pulverized <strong>coal</strong> firing, carbon losses from a fluid-<br />

ized bed are high as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ively coarse <strong>coal</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>es<br />

and low combustion temper<strong>at</strong>ure. Combustion efficiency depends on <strong>the</strong><br />

bed velocity and temper<strong>at</strong>ure, excess air, and on <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> character-<br />

istics (which have significant influence on carbon losses). Coal with<br />

high ash content and less vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter would have lower combustion<br />

efficiency. The following experimental d<strong>at</strong>a from <strong>the</strong> test rig demon-<br />

str<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> c.e. values in burning different <strong>coal</strong>s may differ gre<strong>at</strong>ly,<br />

even when <strong>the</strong> superficial ve$ocity, bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure, and excess air r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

are approxim<strong>at</strong>ely <strong>the</strong> same.<br />

Vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ters Ash<br />

on combustible on analytical Total<br />

basis basis carbon losses<br />

Bituminous <strong>coal</strong> 35.48 31.40 3.77<br />

Lean <strong>coal</strong> 17.50 39.04 10.67<br />

Colliery wastage 48.09 76.50 7.95<br />

If anthracite is burned, carbon losses will be higher than <strong>the</strong> above<br />

values. It is evident th<strong>at</strong> applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> FBC in utility boilers will<br />

require significantly increased combustion efficiencies.<br />

197


-3-<br />

TWO approaches for improving combustion efficiencies are: using a car-<br />

bon burnup bed (CBB) and fly ash reinjection into <strong>the</strong> main fluidized<br />

bed.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CBB was examined using <strong>the</strong> 463 x 324 mm rig. The<br />

tests showed th<strong>at</strong> with <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a CBB (an efficiency <strong>of</strong> 80 percent was<br />

assumed for <strong>the</strong> cyclone dust collector), combustion efficiencies may<br />

reach values <strong>of</strong> 97.5-98.0 percent when bituminous or lean <strong>coal</strong>s are<br />

burned.<br />

The recycling or reinjecting <strong>of</strong> elutri<strong>at</strong>ed fines has not been tested,<br />

but judging from <strong>the</strong> liter<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries and experiences in<br />

applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> carbon recycling in some FBB in China, we can say th<strong>at</strong><br />

particul<strong>at</strong>e recycling (especially for <strong>coal</strong>s with high vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter<br />

content) is also an effective measure. For example, <strong>the</strong> combustion<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> a bituminous <strong>coal</strong>-fired combustor may <strong>at</strong>tain - 98 percent.<br />

When a CBB is used, in order to avoid high dust loading, <strong>the</strong> gas stream<br />

from <strong>the</strong> CBB must be directed to an individual gas flue. Therefore, <strong>the</strong><br />

CBB is in essence a separ<strong>at</strong>e fluidized-bed boiler, which oper<strong>at</strong>es <strong>at</strong><br />

different conditions from <strong>the</strong> main bed and needs its own particul<strong>at</strong>e<br />

removal system. In addition to being a more complex system, <strong>the</strong> relia-<br />

ble combined oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a CBB with <strong>the</strong> main fluidized bed is ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

difficult because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inevitable fluctu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> characteristics<br />

and <strong>the</strong> main bed exploit<strong>at</strong>ion; <strong>the</strong> recycle system is much simpler. The<br />

main disadvantage <strong>of</strong> recycling <strong>the</strong> dust recovered from <strong>the</strong> dust<br />

collector is <strong>the</strong> resulting high dust loading <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas stream. The<br />

erosive characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dust must be determined by oper<strong>at</strong>ing a<br />

demonstr<strong>at</strong>ion unit over an extended period <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

In our view, with regard to industrial FBB, <strong>the</strong> carbon recycling system<br />

may be more desirable in most cases. Where less reactive <strong>coal</strong> such as<br />

anthracite is burned and <strong>the</strong> high combustion efficiencies which are<br />

required for a utility boiler are pursued, <strong>the</strong> CBB system may have to be<br />

used.<br />

The even distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> over <strong>the</strong> bed has proved to be <strong>of</strong> signifi-<br />

cance for <strong>at</strong>taining good combustion efficiency. It has been reported<br />

th<strong>at</strong> s<strong>at</strong>isfactory <strong>coal</strong> di<strong>at</strong>ribution can be achieved if one feed point is<br />

provided for every 0.84 m <strong>of</strong> bed area. This would result in nearly<br />

70 points for a 130 t/h unit. In order to meet <strong>the</strong> above requirement, a<br />

pneum<strong>at</strong>ic method <strong>of</strong> transporting crushed <strong>coal</strong> may be necessary. How-<br />

ever, for large FBB (e.g., 200 MW units) <strong>the</strong> feed lines and control sys-<br />

tem would become very complic<strong>at</strong>ed; <strong>the</strong>refore, a method to improve <strong>the</strong><br />

area per feed point must be found if <strong>the</strong> pneum<strong>at</strong>ic feed system is to be<br />

simplified.<br />

For purposes <strong>of</strong> this test a pneum<strong>at</strong>ic feed system was not considered,<br />

but four screw-type <strong>coal</strong> feeders were installed on <strong>the</strong> front wall. The<br />

area <strong>of</strong> distributing pl<strong>at</strong>e far <strong>the</strong> 24th FBB unit was 8 m ; this provided<br />

one feed point for every 2 m bed area. To promote even <strong>coal</strong> distribution,<br />

a <strong>coal</strong> spreading method was developed. During <strong>the</strong> tests <strong>of</strong> this<br />

method on <strong>the</strong> 24 t/h FBB unit only two feeders were put into oper<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

198


,<br />

I<br />

B.<br />

2<br />

which temporarily raised <strong>the</strong> area per feed point to 4 m .<br />

demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> when <strong>the</strong> spreading device was used, combustion<br />

efficiencies were increased by 3.5-5.0 percent.<br />

Arrangement <strong>of</strong> Bed He<strong>at</strong>ing Surface<br />

-4-<br />

It was<br />

Vertical immersed tubes are generally used for small FBB. They are<br />

convenient for maintenance, and are more resistant to abrasion than<br />

horizontal tubes.<br />

For larger units, to allow <strong>the</strong> necessary surface area required to be<br />

placed in <strong>the</strong> bed, horizontal or inclined buried tubes (staggered or<br />

in-line) are generally adopted. It is common knowledge th<strong>at</strong> so far as<br />

convection surfaces are concerned, staggered tubes have higher he<strong>at</strong><br />

transfer r<strong>at</strong>es than tubes arrayed in-line. Given this inform<strong>at</strong>ion, is<br />

it still correct to use immersed tubes in FBB? To answer this question,<br />

special comparison tests were carried out. The results showed th<strong>at</strong>,<br />

owing to <strong>the</strong> specific n<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> in-bed he<strong>at</strong> transfer, he<strong>at</strong> transfer<br />

coefficients for <strong>the</strong> in-line array <strong>of</strong> tubes fully compared with those<br />

for staggered tubes.<br />

Initially, <strong>the</strong> immersed tubes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 24 t/h unit were staggered. When<br />

<strong>the</strong> unit was put into oper<strong>at</strong>ion, it was immedi<strong>at</strong>ely discovered th<strong>at</strong><br />

excessive puls<strong>at</strong>ions occurred and <strong>the</strong> erosion r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> staggered<br />

inclined tubes and <strong>the</strong> fire brick walls were high.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above tests, it was decided to change <strong>the</strong> staggered<br />

tubes into in-line array. After <strong>the</strong> modific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>the</strong> steam output was<br />

maintained, <strong>the</strong> fluidizing quality became normal, and <strong>the</strong> abrasion r<strong>at</strong>es<br />

were reduced.<br />

C. Immersed Superhe<strong>at</strong>er<br />

An industrial FBB can be designed with only an evapor<strong>at</strong>ing surface in<br />

<strong>the</strong> bed; this appears adequ<strong>at</strong>e to absorb <strong>the</strong> required amount <strong>of</strong> he<strong>at</strong><br />

from <strong>the</strong> bed. In contrast, a certain portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> superhe<strong>at</strong>ing or<br />

rehe<strong>at</strong>ing surface <strong>of</strong> a utility boiler must be placed in <strong>the</strong> bed in addi-<br />

tion to <strong>the</strong> gener<strong>at</strong>ing immersed surface. It seems useful to examine<br />

some problems <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> buried superhe<strong>at</strong>er.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong>n<strong>the</strong>,high he<strong>at</strong> transfer to immersed tubes (generally 220-<br />

250 kcal/m 'h' C), it is <strong>of</strong> gre<strong>at</strong> importance to find out whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

wall temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> buried superhe<strong>at</strong>er tubes will exceed <strong>the</strong> limits. To<br />

this end, <strong>the</strong> character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong> flux distribution along <strong>the</strong> periphery<br />

<strong>of</strong> an immersed tube must be determined. Special tests showed th<strong>at</strong><br />

this distribution was uneven, and surprisingly, <strong>the</strong> highest he<strong>at</strong> flux<br />

point was found <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> a horizontal buried tube (Figure<br />

2). The maximum he<strong>at</strong> flux exceeded <strong>the</strong> average value by 15-30 percent<br />

(in some cases even more), which means <strong>the</strong>re exists an intense<br />

circul<strong>at</strong>ing flow <strong>of</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>es within <strong>the</strong> "cap area" above <strong>the</strong><br />

immersed tube. Figure 3 illustr<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>e manner <strong>of</strong><br />

particul<strong>at</strong>e circul<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

199


-5-<br />

642 x 5.5, 12 Cr/MoV steel tubes were used for <strong>the</strong> experimental submerged<br />

superhe<strong>at</strong>er. Thg steam velocity was . 35 m/S and <strong>the</strong> mean exit<br />

steam temper<strong>at</strong>ure - 420 C. Thermocouples were placed on <strong>the</strong> outer sur-<br />

face <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower part <strong>of</strong> two buried superhe<strong>at</strong>er tubes. No <strong>the</strong>rmocouple<br />

was placed on ? upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tubes, because it was thought th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> maximum he<strong>at</strong> flux area must be <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower half periphery; thus,<br />

<strong>the</strong> maximum tube wall temper<strong>at</strong>ure was not mepure$. The temper<strong>at</strong>ures<br />

taken from <strong>the</strong> lower half periphery were 530 -550 c- It was clear th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> wall temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tubes must have been higher.<br />

After about 3 months <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion, a metallographic examin<strong>at</strong>ion was made<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tube. It was found th<strong>at</strong> grade 3 spheriodiz<strong>at</strong>ion had taken place<br />

<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>,tube, which meant th<strong>at</strong> although <strong>the</strong> steam temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

was as low as 420 C, using <strong>the</strong> 12Cr/MoV steel tube was not safe. It<br />

appears th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> tube wall temper<strong>at</strong>ure must be considered carefully and<br />

high-quality he<strong>at</strong> resistant alloy steel will have to be used when<br />

superhe<strong>at</strong>ing or rehe<strong>at</strong>ing surfaces need to be placed in <strong>the</strong> bed.<br />

The protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> immersed superhe<strong>at</strong>er during start-up and bed<br />

slumping was also <strong>of</strong> considerable concern. As oper<strong>at</strong>ing experience had<br />

proved, <strong>the</strong> buried superhe<strong>at</strong>ing tube temper<strong>at</strong>ure would not exceed <strong>the</strong><br />

allowed value during start-up and slumping, provided <strong>the</strong> surface was<br />

arranged properly and partial bed start-up sequence (a portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

bed where <strong>the</strong> immersed superhe<strong>at</strong>er is loc<strong>at</strong>ed, lit up only after an<br />

adequ<strong>at</strong>e steam flow is established) was adopted. When <strong>the</strong> boiler was to<br />

be shut down and <strong>the</strong> bed slumped, <strong>the</strong> immersed superhe<strong>at</strong>er would be<br />

safe. The immersed superhe<strong>at</strong>er was arranged above <strong>the</strong> slumped bed and<br />

itsowall temper<strong>at</strong>ures, measured during slumping, were all lower than<br />

570 C. The temper<strong>at</strong>ures measured p <strong>the</strong> space between <strong>the</strong> superhe<strong>at</strong>er<br />

and slumped bed did not exceed 600 C.<br />

The temper<strong>at</strong>ure distribution over <strong>the</strong> bed was rel<strong>at</strong>ively even, and <strong>the</strong><br />

devi<strong>at</strong>ion in he<strong>at</strong> absorption among <strong>the</strong> individual tubes was not gre<strong>at</strong>.<br />

Generally speaking, <strong>the</strong> devi<strong>at</strong>ion coefficient is about 1.1, provided <strong>the</strong><br />

surface is appropri<strong>at</strong>ely designed. The temper<strong>at</strong>ure gradient along <strong>the</strong><br />

feeder axis may be somewh<strong>at</strong> gre<strong>at</strong>er; <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong> tubes <strong>of</strong> an immersed<br />

superhe<strong>at</strong>er would preferably be oriented in parallel with <strong>the</strong> feeder<br />

axis (as shown in Figure 1). If bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure unevenness along <strong>the</strong><br />

feeder axis is significant and <strong>the</strong> superhe<strong>at</strong>er tubes are <strong>at</strong> right angles<br />

to <strong>the</strong> feeder axis, higher devi<strong>at</strong>ion coefficients <strong>of</strong> 1.20-1.26 may be<br />

reached, depending on <strong>the</strong> bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure gradient.<br />

D. Erosion <strong>of</strong> Immersed Tubes<br />

At present, ra<strong>the</strong>r coarse <strong>coal</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>es are generally used in China.<br />

Consequently, high fluidizing velocity has been adopted. Many years <strong>of</strong><br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ional practice has shown th<strong>at</strong> in most cases <strong>the</strong> abrasion <strong>of</strong><br />

inclined buried tubes is very severe.<br />

For example, tubes (20 carbon<br />

steel) with a thickness <strong>of</strong> 3 rnm may wear out after only - 4000 hours <strong>of</strong><br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ion. The most serious abrasion usually occurs in <strong>the</strong> first<br />

(lower) row <strong>of</strong> inclined buried tube surfaces. Along <strong>the</strong> inclined tubes<br />

certain more severely abraded sections can be observed. The abrasion<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e is very uneven along <strong>the</strong> tube periphery. Figure 4 illustr<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong><br />

severe abrasion <strong>of</strong> a 20-carbon steel tube with a thickness <strong>of</strong> 6.25 mm<br />

(no antiabrasive tre<strong>at</strong>ment used) after 8682 hours <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion. The<br />

200<br />

!


-6-<br />

abrasion r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tube is three times as high as th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top. Several types <strong>of</strong> antiabrasive tre<strong>at</strong>ments for immersed tubes<br />

were tried, and some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m have showed effect. However, when<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ively hard <strong>coal</strong>s are burned <strong>the</strong>se measures can only extend tube<br />

life to a certain degree, <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> abrasion problem cannot be<br />

regarded as solved. Lignite-fired, fluidized-bed boilers may be <strong>the</strong><br />

Only exception. The erosion r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir immersed tubes is not high,<br />

owing to <strong>the</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tness and light weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lignite.<br />

It seems to us th<strong>at</strong> low fluidizing velocity should be accepted as <strong>the</strong><br />

primary measure for extending <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> immersed tubes, with<br />

additional antiabrasive tre<strong>at</strong>ment when necessary. This may be <strong>the</strong> final<br />

solution to <strong>the</strong> erosion problem. Besides <strong>the</strong> diminished tube abrasion,<br />

low fluidizing velocity may <strong>of</strong>fer o<strong>the</strong>r benefits such as higher<br />

combustion efficiency, better SO2 absorption (when limestone or dolomite<br />

is added to beds where high-sulfur <strong>coal</strong> is burned), and <strong>the</strong> possibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> using shallow beds to reduce <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> blower power required. In<br />

order to lessen <strong>the</strong> abrasion r<strong>at</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> immersed tubes should be<br />

reasonably arranged to avoid excessive puls<strong>at</strong>ions and gas flow<br />

imbalances in <strong>the</strong> bed.<br />

E. Start-up <strong>of</strong> Fluidized Bed<br />

The process <strong>of</strong> start-up is, in essence, to he<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed m<strong>at</strong>erial to a<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure high enough for stable combustion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>. It seems very<br />

simple, but when boiler service is initi<strong>at</strong>ed oper<strong>at</strong>ors <strong>of</strong>ten run into<br />

trouble.<br />

"Fixed st<strong>at</strong>e" start-up is a method adopted in <strong>the</strong> initial period <strong>of</strong> FBB<br />

development in China. In this process, <strong>the</strong> bed remains fixed <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> start-up. When <strong>the</strong> bed m<strong>at</strong>erial has been he<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong><br />

appropri<strong>at</strong>e degree, <strong>the</strong> bed is tranformed from a fixed to a fluidized<br />

st<strong>at</strong>e and continues to be he<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> required temper<strong>at</strong>ure. During<br />

<strong>the</strong> start-up process, clinkering or flame failure may easily take place<br />

if <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong> balance is not properly controlled. Exploit<strong>at</strong>ion depends to<br />

a gre<strong>at</strong> extent on <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>or's experience, so it is not completely<br />

reliable. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> time required for starting up is ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

long.<br />

Through <strong>the</strong> search for a better method, <strong>the</strong> so called "fluidized st<strong>at</strong>e"<br />

start-up technology has been developed. The major fe<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> this<br />

process is th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed is brought to fluidiz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> very beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> start-up. The fluidized bed is he<strong>at</strong>ed up by an oil burner; <strong>the</strong><br />

he<strong>at</strong>ing is uniform and steady. In 10-20 minutes, 8 bed Bith an area <strong>of</strong><br />

4 mz can be he<strong>at</strong>ed from ambient temper<strong>at</strong>ure to 900 -1000 C. It is much<br />

quicker than <strong>the</strong> "fixed st<strong>at</strong>e" method, and oil consumption can thus be<br />

reduced. Figure 5 shows a typical bed start-up curve in which <strong>the</strong><br />

"fluidized st<strong>at</strong>e" method was used.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The main reason for developing fluidized-bed boilers in China is to burn<br />

high-ash <strong>coal</strong> <strong>of</strong> low calorific value, and thus broaden <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> energy<br />

resources. This appears to be especially important in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn pro-<br />

201


-7-<br />

vinces. Practice over a number <strong>of</strong> years has indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> FBB are<br />

promising, <strong>at</strong> least for industrial boilers and small electricity gener<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

units in China. The applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> FBB to utility power plants, however,<br />

depends on future development, economic factors, and <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong><br />

intermedi<strong>at</strong>e demonstr<strong>at</strong>ion units.<br />

There is no doubt th<strong>at</strong> many areas still need fur<strong>the</strong>r investig<strong>at</strong>ion and th<strong>at</strong><br />

equipment could be improved, but we are convinced th<strong>at</strong> a good start has<br />

already been made. Dong-fang Boiler Works now produces commercial FBB with<br />

steam capacity <strong>of</strong> up to 35 t/h. Units <strong>of</strong> gre<strong>at</strong>er capacity are under consider<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

5 : vm: 51 3 : 4<br />

fig. f - 24 fluidized Bed Boiler (modified)<br />

202


\if<br />

F3.3 - Particul<strong>at</strong>e Circul<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

(6<br />

in Cap Area”<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

I<br />

159.4 - Wornout<br />

/‘----<br />

I<br />

/<br />

5 /O I5<br />

Time ,min .<br />

Fiq.5- Bed Start-up Curve<br />

203


A DATA ACQUISITION AND CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A<br />

FLUIDIZED BED COMBUSTION UNIT<br />

13. V. Church and D. G. Pincock<br />

Applied Microelectronics Institute, P. 0. Box 1000,<br />

Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2x4<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Centre for Energy Studies <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> Technical University <strong>of</strong> Nova Scotia is<br />

currently developing a small scale fluidized bed combustion unit for domestic he<strong>at</strong>-<br />

ing purposes. The Electrical Engineering Department <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> University was called<br />

upon to provide <strong>the</strong> electronics necessary to control and ga<strong>the</strong>r oper<strong>at</strong>ing d<strong>at</strong>a on<br />

an improved prototype. The purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present system is to develop an efficient<br />

control algorithm. If <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed proves feasible, <strong>the</strong> hardware can be simp-<br />

lified to an inexpensive microprocessor controller.<br />

OVERALL SYSTEM DESIGN<br />

The main requirement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electronic system is to maintain <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed between <strong>the</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> 750° - 95OoC. The method <strong>of</strong> control is<br />

to monitor not only <strong>the</strong> bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure but also <strong>the</strong> stack temper<strong>at</strong>ure and concentr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> pollutants and <strong>the</strong>n adjust <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> fuel and air input to achieve<br />

complete combustion. Since <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed is integr<strong>at</strong>ed with a back-up domestic<br />

oil-fired hydronic he<strong>at</strong>ing system, control <strong>of</strong> boiler temper<strong>at</strong>ure is also a system<br />

requirement. In addition alarms are energized and appropri<strong>at</strong>e actions taken when<br />

<strong>the</strong> fluid bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure is outside <strong>the</strong> desired range.<br />

To aid in development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> control algorithm,<strong>the</strong> fluidized bed and back-up<br />

he<strong>at</strong>ing unit are fitted with a variety <strong>of</strong> sensors. Examples include <strong>the</strong>rmocouples<br />

for temper<strong>at</strong>ures, gas analyzers for oxygen and carbon monoxide, and pressure trans-<br />

ducers for air flow r<strong>at</strong>es. Since <strong>the</strong> total number and type <strong>of</strong> sensors is variable,<br />

expansion and modific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> both hardware and s<strong>of</strong>tware by <strong>the</strong> user is highly de-<br />

sirable. With <strong>the</strong>se points in mind, <strong>the</strong> system <strong>of</strong> Figure l. was developed.<br />

The general philosophy is to employ <strong>the</strong> desktop computer in <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> a<br />

"host", controlling d<strong>at</strong>a flow and perfoming arithmetic calcul<strong>at</strong>ions. The host also<br />

acts as an interface between <strong>the</strong> console (user) and <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a acquisition unit when<br />

system configur<strong>at</strong>ion changes are desired. The printer provides a record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

system st<strong>at</strong>us and oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions.<br />

The next section briefly describes <strong>the</strong> components selected to realize <strong>the</strong><br />

system <strong>of</strong> Figure 1.<br />

Syscem Hardware<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> project is <strong>of</strong> a developmental n<strong>at</strong>ure it was thought highly desirable<br />

to select major components which are general purpose in n<strong>at</strong>ure and, hence, useful<br />

in future applic<strong>at</strong>ions. To this end, <strong>the</strong> STD BUS was selected as <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

microprocessor controlled d<strong>at</strong>a acquisition unit. The STD BUS was developed by Pro-<br />

Log and MOSTEK and is now quite popular. A wide variety <strong>of</strong> plug-in cards and complete<br />

systems are available from manufacturers such as Pro-Log, MOSTEK, Intersil<br />

and Analog Devices.<br />

The STD BUS standardizes <strong>the</strong> physical and electrical aspects <strong>of</strong> modular 8-bit<br />

microprocessor card systems. The standard permits any card to work in any slot <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> bussed mo<strong>the</strong>rboard which provides internal communic<strong>at</strong>ion. All o<strong>the</strong>r connections<br />

to <strong>the</strong> outside world are by connectors <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> opposite ends <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cards. Available<br />

cards include all <strong>the</strong> popular 8-bit processors, memory expansion, digital<br />

204


\'<br />

I/O. analog 1/13. industrial I/O (relays and triacs) and peripheral interfaces.<br />

The d<strong>at</strong>a acquisition unit contains 4 plug-in cards, two <strong>of</strong> which are custom<br />

built. Figure 2 shows how <strong>the</strong> various functions are distributed. The processor<br />

card uses an 8085A and has sufficient random access and program memory on-board.<br />

With <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> signal conditioning for low-level signals, <strong>the</strong> entire analog<br />

I/O Subsystem is contained on <strong>the</strong> RTI-1225 card manufactured by Analog Devices COrP.<br />

It is designed specifically for interfacing real timeanalog signals to microcomputer<br />

systems. On <strong>the</strong> input side <strong>the</strong>re are 16 channels multiplexed to a sample and hold<br />

anIplifier and a 10 bit A to D converter.<br />

The output side has 2 channels with 8 bit<br />

resolution. Communic<strong>at</strong>ion is memory mapped and appears as five contiguous address<br />

loc<strong>at</strong>ions which are used to control <strong>the</strong> functions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> card and pass d<strong>at</strong>a to and<br />

from <strong>the</strong> microprocessor.<br />

The custom built cards combine two functions on each. One handles <strong>the</strong>rmocouple<br />

signal conditioning and digital 1/0 while <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r contains a real time clock and<br />

a UART for interfacing to <strong>the</strong> desktop computer. Four <strong>the</strong>rmocouples <strong>of</strong> any type can<br />

be handled by <strong>the</strong> present card, with gain and cold junction compens<strong>at</strong>ion s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

Y selectable. Additional cards may be added as required. All temper<strong>at</strong>ure channels<br />

are multiplexed into channel one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> A to D converter, leaving 15 single-ended<br />

0-10 volt analog input channels.<br />

Oper<strong>at</strong>ing d<strong>at</strong>a o<strong>the</strong>r than temper<strong>at</strong>ures are supplied by <strong>the</strong> monitoring instru-<br />

ments (e.9. oxygen analyzer). The outputs from such instruments are in general<br />

fully compens<strong>at</strong>ed and conditioned 4-20 mA currents or selectable low level voltages.<br />

Instruments with 0-10 volt outputs can thus connect directly to <strong>the</strong> A to D converter.<br />

In OUT system, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide monitors produce only a 0- 5 volt<br />

output, which still provides adequ<strong>at</strong>e resolution and accuracy with a direct connec-<br />

tion. Instruments with current loop outputs also connect directly by termin<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

<strong>the</strong> loop <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> A to D input with a 500 ohm resistor to produce a 2-10 volt signal<br />

range. If o<strong>the</strong>r low level sensors such as strain guages are required, <strong>the</strong>y can be<br />

amplified externally with modules which produce ei<strong>the</strong>r current loop or 0-10 volt<br />

outputs. Examples include <strong>the</strong> Analog Devices 2B5O series.<br />

The host computer is a desktop unit which does <strong>the</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> control<br />

algorithm and prepares system st<strong>at</strong>us inform<strong>at</strong>ion for display <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> console and<br />

printer. This computer is a Superbrain (Intertech D<strong>at</strong>a Systems, Columbia, South<br />

Carolina) based on <strong>the</strong> Z-80A microprocessor and using <strong>the</strong> CP/M oper<strong>at</strong>ing system.<br />

It is a self-contained unit having a CRT, keyboard, two floppy disk drives, 64K <strong>of</strong><br />

memory and 2 1/0 Ports.<br />

In keeping with <strong>the</strong> overall philosophy <strong>of</strong> hardware selection, <strong>the</strong> printer is<br />

a Decwriter LA-120 which provides <strong>the</strong> user with a very flexible and <strong>at</strong>tractive<br />

hard-copy terminal for future use.<br />

System S<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

The system s<strong>of</strong>tware was develpped in two stages. First <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a acquisition<br />

unit program was written in PL/M. Compil<strong>at</strong>ion was done on a large time-shared<br />

system and <strong>the</strong> result downloaded to a PROM programmer. Included in <strong>the</strong> 1/0 portion<br />

is a segment which enabled testing and calibr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analog hardware as <strong>the</strong><br />

program was expanded. Following this <strong>the</strong> host computer program was written and<br />

tested a portion <strong>at</strong> a time with <strong>the</strong> working d<strong>at</strong>a acquisition unit. Rapid develop-<br />

ment <strong>of</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ively unsophistic<strong>at</strong>ed processing, combined with ease <strong>of</strong> program main-<br />

tenance by <strong>the</strong> users led to <strong>the</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> BASIC as <strong>the</strong> host language.<br />

The main tasks assigned to <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a acquisition unit aretemporarystorage <strong>of</strong><br />

raw binary d<strong>at</strong>a from all sensors, conversion to ASCII <strong>of</strong> this same d<strong>at</strong>a, response<br />

205


to requests by <strong>the</strong> host computer and monitoring alarm conditions in <strong>the</strong> fluidized<br />

bed. Single letter codes sent by <strong>the</strong> host initi<strong>at</strong>e any desired actions. Examples<br />

include passing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>at</strong>est d<strong>at</strong>a, adjustment <strong>of</strong> fuel or air motors, or changes<br />

in system configur<strong>at</strong>ion such as number <strong>of</strong> active channels.<br />

PL/M is a programming language designed for Intel's 8 bit microcomputers. The<br />

language is structurally similar to PL/I SO th<strong>at</strong> programs are somewh<strong>at</strong> self-document-<br />

ing and easily altered and maintained. A memory map for <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a acquisition unit<br />

is shown in Figure 3. The program is stored in read-only memory and <strong>the</strong> analog 1/0<br />

subsystem is placed <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 64k address space. This applic<strong>at</strong>ion uses<br />

about lk bytes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> available on board ROM.<br />

The supervisory BASIC program gets <strong>the</strong> l<strong>at</strong>est d<strong>at</strong>a from all sensors, converts<br />

to appropri<strong>at</strong>e units and form<strong>at</strong>s and displays this inform<strong>at</strong>ion on <strong>the</strong> console and<br />

printer. Time <strong>of</strong> day and upd<strong>at</strong>e interval are provided by <strong>the</strong> real time clock, which<br />

is s<strong>of</strong>tware settable from <strong>the</strong> host. For non-linear sensor readings, disk files con-<br />

taining appropri<strong>at</strong>e tables are used for interpol<strong>at</strong>ion. Such is <strong>the</strong> case for all<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmocouple readings. The converted d<strong>at</strong>a is <strong>the</strong>n utilized by <strong>the</strong> control algorithm<br />

to determine if fuel and air feed corrections are required. If so, this inform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

is passed to <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a acquisition unit and out <strong>the</strong> D to A channels to motor controll-<br />

ers. Finally,a second check on <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure is done by <strong>the</strong> host to<br />

alert <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>or in <strong>the</strong> event <strong>of</strong> a failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hardware alarms.<br />

Conclusion<br />

A d<strong>at</strong>a acquisition and control system for a fluidized bed combustion unit has<br />

been described. It should be re-emphasized th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> developed algorithm can be<br />

easily moved to read-only memory in a low cost controller. It is believed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

choice <strong>of</strong> major components has resulted in a system which is sufficiently general in<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ure to not only serve <strong>the</strong> current project but also to prove useful in future<br />

applic<strong>at</strong>ions. The type <strong>of</strong> system described should find applic<strong>at</strong>ion wherever<br />

monitoring, recording and control <strong>of</strong> analog or digital signals and processes is<br />

required.<br />

206


ACQUISITION<br />

DATA<br />

UNIT <<br />

I<br />

L-<br />

J (T) [CONSOLEI<br />

FIGURE I. OVERALL SYSTEM<br />

IIGITAL I/O<br />

THERMO.<br />

INPUTS<br />

0-<br />

RELAYS<br />

I I<br />

j.<br />

AND<br />

D/A<br />

FIGURE 2. DATA ACQUISITION UNIT<br />

207<br />

MO<br />

PRINTER<br />

Y<br />

REAL-TIME<br />

CLOCK<br />

AND<br />

UART<br />

TO/FROM<br />

IR<br />

is COMPUTER


FFFFH<br />

F F FBH<br />

3000H<br />

2000H<br />

000OH' '0<br />

FIGURE 3. D. A.U. MEMORY MAP.<br />

2 08<br />

12 K<br />

8K


SAMPLING SYSTEM FOR FLUIDIZED BED APPLICATIONS -<br />

RESULTS OF FOUR YEARS OF TESTING ON B&W/EPRI's 6' x 6' FLUIDIZED BED TEST FACILITY<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

K. L. Loudin and P. W. Maurer<br />

The Babcock & Wilcox Company<br />

Research and Development Division<br />

Alliance Research Center<br />

Alliance, Ohio 44601<br />

W. Howe<br />

Electric Power Research Institute<br />

Palo Alto, California 94304<br />

In cooper<strong>at</strong>ion with The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), The Babcock 6<br />

Wilcox Company (B&W) has built and is oper<strong>at</strong>ing a 6-foot x 6-foot (6' x 6')<br />

Atmospheric Fluidized Bed Combustion (AFBC) Development Facility <strong>at</strong> its Alliance<br />

Research Center in Alliance, Ohio. A complete description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facility design<br />

details is contained in EPRI Final Report '3-1688. An artist's rendition (Figure 1)<br />

identifies <strong>the</strong> major components <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facility.<br />

The 6' x 6' size was selected as being large enough to bridge <strong>the</strong> gap between<br />

bench-scale units <strong>the</strong>n in oper<strong>at</strong>ion and larger, future units in <strong>the</strong> proposal and/or<br />

construction stages. The facility design is flexible (vers<strong>at</strong>ile to modific<strong>at</strong>ions)<br />

in many areas -- number <strong>of</strong> feed points, immersed tube bundle configur<strong>at</strong>ions, ash<br />

recycle configur<strong>at</strong>ions, interchangeable gas sample systems, etc. -- and is highly<br />

instrumented (controls, interlocks, d<strong>at</strong>a acquisition, and sampling) to closely<br />

simul<strong>at</strong>e utility boiler designs. The size, design, and equipment selections have<br />

produced a hot test facility with <strong>the</strong> capability <strong>of</strong> gener<strong>at</strong>ing significant<br />

performance d<strong>at</strong>a over extended periods <strong>of</strong> steady oper<strong>at</strong>ion for a multiple number <strong>of</strong><br />

planned test conditions.<br />

The facility construction was completed in October 1977. Following a 5-month<br />

startup and debugging phase, <strong>the</strong> first test series was conducted in April 1978.<br />

Since th<strong>at</strong> time, approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 2000 hours <strong>of</strong> testing (five to eight test series) per<br />

year have been logged.<br />

GAS SAMPLING SYSTEMS<br />

Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 6' x 6' AFBC test facility mand<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

accur<strong>at</strong>e sampling and gas concentr<strong>at</strong>ion measurements. For example, measurements <strong>of</strong><br />

C02, CO, and Hydrocarbons are used in calcul<strong>at</strong>ing combustion efficiency while <strong>the</strong><br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> SO2 is needed to calcul<strong>at</strong>e sulfur capture. Oxygen measurements, also<br />

used idperformance calcul<strong>at</strong>ions, are used by <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ors in setting <strong>the</strong> desired<br />

facility oper<strong>at</strong>ing test conditions. Figure 2 shows <strong>the</strong> loc<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main gas and<br />

solids sample points on <strong>the</strong> 6' x 6' unit.<br />

Obtaining gas concentr<strong>at</strong>ion d<strong>at</strong>a required <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a sampling system th<strong>at</strong><br />

included <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> many special instruments and/or equipment. The original system<br />

layout and details are shown on Figure 3 and Table 1, respectively. The two<br />

independent systems th<strong>at</strong> make up <strong>the</strong> complete system are identified as <strong>the</strong> mobile<br />

and furnace outlet systems. Sampling flexibility is gained by being able to<br />

209


interchange systems and/or components. The original system has been expanded to<br />

include NO and Hydrocarbon measurements <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> furnace outlet and CO measurement<br />

<strong>at</strong> in-bed znd freeboard loc<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

Table 1<br />

Tabul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Gas Sampling System Details<br />

Tank Fan Calibr<strong>at</strong>ion Gases SO2, CO. 02, NO. C02. Air, and ti2<br />

Instrument Air System 60 - 100 PSig (2 - 3 SCFM)<br />

G4S SAMPLE SYSTEMS<br />

SO2. CO. 02, NO,. and C02 Analyzers<br />

Hydrocarbon Analyzer<br />

C m n Tank Farm<br />

Commn lnstrwnt Air Supply<br />

Separ<strong>at</strong>e Sample Probes<br />

Separ<strong>at</strong>e Filter-Cyclone Assemblies<br />

Separ<strong>at</strong>e He<strong>at</strong>ed Sample Lines<br />

Separ<strong>at</strong>e Filter-Pump Systems<br />

lnstrumnt Air to Pump Control Switch<br />

Cooling W<strong>at</strong>er to Probes<br />

GAS SAMPLING SOURCE<br />

Approxim<strong>at</strong>e Source Gas Temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

Sample Gas Temper<strong>at</strong>ure @ Probe Discharge<br />

Sample Gas Temper<strong>at</strong>ure in Sample Line<br />

Sample Gas Temper<strong>at</strong>ure @ Pump Inlet<br />

Sample Gas Temper<strong>at</strong>ure After Analyzers<br />

Sample Gas Flow Fran Source<br />

Sample Gas to 02 Analyzers<br />

Instrument Air to 02 Analyzers<br />

Sample Gas to SO2. CO. and C02 Analyzers<br />

Sample Gas to NO, Analyzers<br />

Instrument Air to NOx Analyzers<br />

Recorder "A" Gas Printout<br />

Recorder "B" Gas Printout<br />

Furnace Outlet Probe<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

10 psig @ 1200 cclminute<br />

20 gph maximum<br />

Stack (Furnace Out)<br />

~<br />

900'F<br />

31 0°F<br />

300'F<br />

180°F<br />

hbient (80OF)<br />

5 literslminute<br />

250 cclminute<br />

10 psig<br />

1000 cclminute<br />

1200 cclminute<br />

35 psig<br />

SO2. CO. 02, and to2<br />

Mobile Probe<br />

Yes<br />

110<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

10 psig B 1200 cclminute<br />

20 gph nmximum<br />

"In-Bed" and Freeboard<br />

165OOF<br />

310'F<br />

300'F<br />

180°F<br />

Ambient (80'F)<br />

5 literslminute<br />

250 cclminute<br />

10 psig<br />

1000 cclminute<br />

1200 cclminute<br />

35 psig<br />

SO2. CO, 02, and NOx<br />

I


GAS SAMPLING WITH ORIGINAL PROBE-FILTER ASSEMBLIES<br />

Furnace Outlet Gas Sample Loc<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

The gas analysis from <strong>the</strong> furnace outlet is used in performance calcul<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

and additionally to set and control <strong>the</strong> facility test conditions. This system must<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>e on a continuous basis. Figures 4 and 5, respectively, show <strong>the</strong> probe<br />

install<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> furnace outlet duct and <strong>the</strong> original probe-filter assembly. The<br />

w<strong>at</strong>er-cooled probe has an open-ended, concentric quartz tube for sample flow. In<br />

turn, <strong>the</strong> tube is connected to an in-line particul<strong>at</strong>e filter assembly (glass cyclone<br />

collectorfdrop out bottle and frit-fiberglass filter unit) through which <strong>the</strong> gas<br />

sample flows enroute to <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ed sample line. The particul<strong>at</strong>e filter assembly,<br />

loc<strong>at</strong>ed in an electrically-he<strong>at</strong>ed cyclone oven (size - 9-1/2 inches square x 21-1/2<br />

inches long), is maintained <strong>at</strong> 30OOF. At normal oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions (no dust<br />

recycle), <strong>the</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>e filter assembly had to be changed twice during each<br />

24-hour oper<strong>at</strong>ing period.<br />

Freeboard Sample Loc<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

The mobile gas sampling system and probe install<strong>at</strong>ion shown in Figure 6 are<br />

used to traverse <strong>the</strong> freeboard <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> loc<strong>at</strong>ions previously shown in Figure 2. A<br />

typical traverse <strong>at</strong> one loc<strong>at</strong>ion would include taking gas samples <strong>at</strong> 12 or 13 points<br />

across <strong>the</strong> width <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facility. A complete traverse, conducted with <strong>the</strong> drive<br />

mechanism on ei<strong>the</strong>r "hand mode" or "autom<strong>at</strong>ic mode", requires from 60 to 90 minutes<br />

to complete. Except for <strong>the</strong> difference in length, <strong>the</strong> furnace outlet and mobile<br />

probe-filter assemblies are identical.<br />

In-Bed Sampling Loc<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

The in-bed gas sampling probe install<strong>at</strong>ion, shown in Figure 7, is used for<br />

traversing in <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed. The original in-bed probe-filter assembly is shown<br />

in Figure 8. The filters are 3/4 inches in diameter x 1-3/4 inches long with a pore<br />

size <strong>of</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 1 micron. The ceramic collar is cemented to <strong>the</strong> filter <strong>at</strong> a<br />

position th<strong>at</strong> is 1/4 inch away from <strong>the</strong> open end. The collar is clamped in <strong>the</strong><br />

probe head <strong>at</strong> a loc<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> presents an active filter flow area <strong>of</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 2<br />

square inches.<br />

Typically, <strong>the</strong> ceramic filter had to be cleaned (nitrogen back-purged) <strong>at</strong> 15-<br />

to 20-minute intervals.<br />

GAS SAMPLING PROBLEMS<br />

The original gas sampling probes oper<strong>at</strong>ed s<strong>at</strong>isfactory and allowed accur<strong>at</strong>e gas<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ion measurements during no dust recycle test conditions. However,<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 6' x 6' AFBC unit has shifted to <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> dust recycle to improve<br />

performance. Uust loadings as high as 10,000 lb/hr have been run <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures up<br />

to 1750'F and <strong>at</strong> gas velocities <strong>of</strong> about 100 ftfsec. The high dust recycle<br />

increased <strong>the</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> were entrained in <strong>the</strong> gas samples. This condition<br />

necessit<strong>at</strong>ed frequent filter changes, caused problems with glassware breakage due to<br />

increased handling, and required more frequent nitrogen back-purging <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> in-bed<br />

filter.<br />

Problems associ<strong>at</strong>ed with gas sampling <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> furnace outlet, freeboard, and<br />

in-bed loc<strong>at</strong>ions are discussed in <strong>the</strong> following paragraphs.<br />

211


Furnace Outlet Gas Sample Loc<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

With high dust recycle r<strong>at</strong>es, <strong>the</strong> filters required continual <strong>at</strong>tention. Each<br />

filter change involved disconnecting and reconnecting five joints in <strong>the</strong> flow<br />

system. In a few instances, slight amounts <strong>of</strong> air infiltr<strong>at</strong>ion (induced by neg<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

pressure in <strong>the</strong> sample line) into <strong>the</strong> gas sample produced incorrect gas<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ions. Increased handling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> glassware and quartz tube produced some<br />

breakage problems. In certain instances, <strong>the</strong> breakage would occur as a crack th<strong>at</strong><br />

was difficult to detect. Undetected cracks, on a couple <strong>of</strong> occasions, permitted air<br />

infiltr<strong>at</strong>ion into <strong>the</strong> sample in such a small quantity th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> incorrect<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ion readings went unnoticed for a few hours. These problems instig<strong>at</strong>ed a<br />

modified probe-filter assembly design th<strong>at</strong> would provide more effective filtering.<br />

The modified design would elimin<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> fragile components, such as glass and<br />

quartz, and would minimize <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> connection joints.<br />

Freeboard Sample Loc<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

Problems with <strong>the</strong> probe-filter assembly were similar to those encountered <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> furnace outlet loc<strong>at</strong>ion. Due to continual filter pluggage, <strong>the</strong> probe could not<br />

be used in <strong>the</strong> fringe area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed i.e., <strong>the</strong> lower sets <strong>of</strong> freeboard ports.<br />

Additionally, <strong>the</strong> long probe length (approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 9 feet) and reloc<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> probe<br />

to all sample ports produced occasional breakage to <strong>the</strong> fragile components. Such<br />

actions also caused occasional air infiltr<strong>at</strong>ion into <strong>the</strong> numerous connection joints.<br />

In-Bed Sampling Loc<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

The solids density <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed has always required <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a nitrogen back-<br />

purge to clean <strong>the</strong> ceramic filter. A combin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> small active filter area<br />

(only 2 square inches) and <strong>the</strong> increased solids concentr<strong>at</strong>ion increased <strong>the</strong><br />

"blow-back-cleaning frequency". The resulting time required to conduct a traverse<br />

more than tripled th<strong>at</strong> required for <strong>the</strong> no ash recycle test condition.<br />

SOLUTIONS FOR SOLVING SAMPLING PROBLEMS<br />

A review <strong>of</strong> sampling <strong>at</strong> all loc<strong>at</strong>ions indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> components included in<br />

<strong>the</strong> probe-filter assemblies were responsible for <strong>the</strong> problems. Fur<strong>the</strong>r review <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> problems encountered <strong>at</strong> each loc<strong>at</strong>ion suggested th<strong>at</strong> a modified probe-filter<br />

design could be adapted for sampling <strong>at</strong> all loc<strong>at</strong>ions. The modified design actions<br />

included <strong>the</strong> following:<br />

0 Install a primary solids filter <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample inlet to <strong>the</strong> probe.<br />

A ceramic filter, supplied by <strong>the</strong> Coors Porcelain Company, with an<br />

active filtering area <strong>of</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 12 square inches was<br />

selected for this applic<strong>at</strong>ion. This filter (size - 1-1/4 inches OD<br />

x 3/4 inch ID x 4 inches long) with a pore size <strong>of</strong> 100 microns was<br />

included on <strong>the</strong> modified probe-filter assembly shown in Figure 9.<br />

0<br />

Install a secondary filter between <strong>the</strong> sample probe and <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

sample line. A cartridge-type filter with two inches <strong>of</strong> kaowool<br />

insul<strong>at</strong>ion (also shown in Figure 9) was proposed to protect o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

components <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample train in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> a failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

primary filter. This secondary filter would elimin<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong><br />

glassware and plastic components which in turn would decrease <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> connection joints where possible air infiltr<strong>at</strong>ion could<br />

occur. The insul<strong>at</strong>ion around <strong>the</strong> filter would elimin<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong><br />

cyclone oven, controls, etc. <strong>the</strong>reby reducing <strong>the</strong> bulkiness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

install<strong>at</strong> ion.<br />

212


Remove <strong>the</strong> quartz tube (gas sample flow tube) from <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> probe. This would elimin<strong>at</strong>e ano<strong>the</strong>r fragile component by<br />

allowing <strong>the</strong> sample to flow down <strong>the</strong> center (stainless steel tube)<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> probe.<br />

PERFORMANCE DATA SUPPORTS MODIFIED SYSTEMS<br />

Primary Filter Performance<br />

The ceramic filter was initially tested <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> furnace outlet gas<br />

sample loc<strong>at</strong>ion. At first, problems developed in sealing <strong>the</strong><br />

ceramic filter and <strong>the</strong> metal tube. After obtaining a good Seal,<br />

<strong>the</strong> ceramic filter performed to maximum expect<strong>at</strong>ions as 6hOm by<br />

<strong>the</strong> following table:<br />

Gas Solid Gas<br />

Temper<strong>at</strong>ure Flow R<strong>at</strong>e Velocity Ceramic Filter Performance<br />

('F) (lb/hr) (ft/sec)<br />

---<br />

800 3000 100 Sample system oper<strong>at</strong>ed continuously for<br />

a period <strong>of</strong> 12 days (288 hours). Hinimal<br />

wear to upstream side <strong>of</strong> filter.<br />

800 10,000 100 Sample system required a filter change<br />

every 2 or 3 days. Minimal wear to<br />

upstream side <strong>of</strong> filter.<br />

The above tests were conducted without back-purging (with nitrogen)<br />

<strong>the</strong> filter. When <strong>the</strong> pressure drop across <strong>the</strong> filter reached its<br />

pre-determined maximum limit, <strong>the</strong> filter was changed.<br />

The filter tests in <strong>the</strong> freeboard area indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> no pluggage<br />

occurred while sampling <strong>at</strong> any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ports. No back-purge system<br />

was used and <strong>the</strong> filters showed no wear after extended periods <strong>of</strong><br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

The in-bed filter tests indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> no pluggage occurred during<br />

a complete traverse across <strong>the</strong> bed. The original probe-filter<br />

assembly had to be back-purged with nitrogen every 15 OK 20 minutes<br />

during each traverse. The nitrogen back-purge cleaning fe<strong>at</strong>ure was<br />

available, but was not used during <strong>the</strong>se l<strong>at</strong>ter tests. It appeared<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> filters could be used indefinitely with no indic<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong><br />

wear.<br />

Secondary Filter Performance<br />

The secondary filter tests <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> furnace gas outlet and freeboard sampling<br />

loc<strong>at</strong>ions indic<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> cartridge-type filter wrapped with two inches <strong>of</strong> kaowool<br />

insul<strong>at</strong>ion met all performance expect<strong>at</strong>ions. This filter served its initial purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> protecting o<strong>the</strong>r components in <strong>the</strong> sample train in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> a failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

primary filter. It also replaced <strong>the</strong> fragile components and served to decrease <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> connection joints (possible air infiltr<strong>at</strong>ion sources) in <strong>the</strong> sample train.<br />

The insul<strong>at</strong>ion contributed to <strong>the</strong> elimin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cyclone oven which made <strong>the</strong><br />

assembly less'bulky and easier to handle. A combin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> insul<strong>at</strong>ed filter and<br />

controlled setting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cooling w<strong>at</strong>er to <strong>the</strong> probe retained <strong>the</strong> gas temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

well above <strong>the</strong> dew point as <strong>the</strong> gas passed through <strong>the</strong> secondary filter enroute to<br />

<strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong>ed sample line. These tests were conducted in <strong>the</strong> most severe environment<br />

possible in both sampling loc<strong>at</strong>ions. The secondary filter on <strong>the</strong> original in-bed<br />

213


probe-filter assembly was not changed, thus no secondary filter tests were Conducted<br />

<strong>at</strong> this sampling loc<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Quartz Tube Versus Stainless Steel Tube Performance D<strong>at</strong>a<br />

The original probe-filter assemblies used <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> furnace gas outlet and<br />

freeboard sample loc<strong>at</strong>ions contained a quartz tube through which <strong>the</strong> gas sample was<br />

drawn. Due to <strong>the</strong> fragile n<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> quartz, it was desirable to elimin<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong><br />

quartz tube and instead use a stainless steel tube. Some concern existed th<strong>at</strong> a<br />

gas-stainless steel reaction -- more likely <strong>at</strong> high gas temper<strong>at</strong>ures -- could<br />

possibly produce incorrect gas concentr<strong>at</strong>ions (particularly with NO ).<br />

By adjusting<br />

<strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er cooling r<strong>at</strong>e on <strong>the</strong> probe, <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas aloig its p<strong>at</strong>h <strong>of</strong><br />

contact with <strong>the</strong> stainless steel was reduced to a low, non-reactive temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

level (200O to 400'F).<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> quartz tube versus stainless steel tube tests, conducted <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> furnace gas outlet and freeboard sample loc<strong>at</strong>ions, are shown in <strong>the</strong> following<br />

performance tabul<strong>at</strong>ion:<br />

S W R Y<br />

Sample Gas<br />

Sample Tube Source Gas Temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

Sample Loc<strong>at</strong>ion DiameterIM<strong>at</strong>erial Temper<strong>at</strong>ure In Probe Gas Concentr<strong>at</strong>ion Comparisons<br />

(Inch) (OF) (OF)<br />

Furnace Outlet 518 SS 800 300 Max Gas concentr<strong>at</strong>ions for 0 , CO , CO,<br />

SO , and NO were essent?ally2<br />

Furnace Outlet 518 Quartz 800 300 Max idfntical f& both <strong>the</strong> quartz and<br />

stainless steel tube sample probes.<br />

Free board 518 SS 1700 280 - 305 Gas concentr<strong>at</strong>ions for 02. CO , CO,<br />

Freeboard 318 ss 1700 325 - 400<br />

SO , and NO were essentially'<br />

idzntical f0"r <strong>the</strong> quartz tube and<br />

<strong>the</strong> two (518" and 318" diameter)<br />

Freeboard 518 Quartz 1700 155 - 220 stainless steel tube sample probes.<br />

Gas sampling and analysis form a major portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> performance evalu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> 6' x 6' AFBC facility. The analysis requires measuring <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> six<br />

different gases <strong>at</strong> three sample loc<strong>at</strong>ions -- in-bed, freeboard, and furnace gas<br />

outlet. Sample flow r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> 6 to 10 liters per minute are needed for analyzing<br />

<strong>the</strong>se gases.<br />

Accur<strong>at</strong>e sampling and analysis from <strong>the</strong> high-temper<strong>at</strong>ure - high velocity, dust-<br />

laden environment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed unit requires <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a system th<strong>at</strong><br />

includes certain special equipment. An "efficient particul<strong>at</strong>e filter" is needed to<br />

clean <strong>the</strong> large-volume gas samples removed from <strong>the</strong> adverse environment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

6' x 6' unit. A ceramic filter -- constructed <strong>of</strong> inert m<strong>at</strong>erial, self-cleaning,<br />

having minimum pressure drop, and able to withstand high temper<strong>at</strong>ures and abrasive<br />

wear -- served as <strong>the</strong> primary particul<strong>at</strong>e filter in our final design.<br />

A cartridge-type secondary filter elimin<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> glassware and decreased<br />

connection joints, while serving its main function <strong>of</strong> protecting <strong>the</strong> remaining<br />

sample system components in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> a failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary (ceramic) filter.<br />

Elimin<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> quartz tube has produced a design th<strong>at</strong> includes no fragile<br />

(glassware or quartz) components.<br />

214


'<br />

'<br />

The modific<strong>at</strong>ions have been combined to produce a refined gas sampling system<br />

th<strong>at</strong> can be used <strong>at</strong> sample loc<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> interest in fluidized beds. It has been<br />

used for collecting and for accur<strong>at</strong>ely analyzing gas d<strong>at</strong>a over extended test periods<br />

for a multiple number <strong>of</strong> planned test conditions. These results have played a major<br />

role in <strong>the</strong> evalu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AFBC performance. The refined gas sampling system --<br />

developed for <strong>the</strong> 6' x 6' fluidized bed applic<strong>at</strong>ion -- is recommended as a reliable<br />

system for fluidized bed units.<br />

215


216


n<br />

n<br />

D<br />

217


The Influence <strong>of</strong> Varying Oper<strong>at</strong>ional Parameters on Both <strong>the</strong> Combustion Efficiency<br />

in and <strong>the</strong> Emission <strong>of</strong> Pollutants from Fluidized Bed Plants 1)<br />

by:<br />

Dr.' H. Munzner, Dr. H.-D. Schilling VDI, Essen<br />

Bergbau-Forschung GmbH, P.O. Box 13 01 40, 4300 Essen 13, Fed.Rep. <strong>of</strong> Germany<br />

1. Methods and Appar<strong>at</strong>us<br />

Our method <strong>of</strong> determining <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> different oper<strong>at</strong>ional ccnditions on<br />

fluidized bed plants consists in a stepwise alter<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> one Single oper<strong>at</strong>ional para-<br />

meter while maintaining <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs as constant as possible (1). It is well known<br />

th<strong>at</strong> this is easiest on a labor<strong>at</strong>ory scale, whereas with increasing plant size <strong>the</strong><br />

procedure becomes more and more onerous. If beyond oper<strong>at</strong>ional parameters also<br />

<strong>the</strong> design concept and <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> a plant are varied, one obtains useful hints how<br />

to generalize and scale-up <strong>the</strong> results achieved.<br />

Present findings were obtained using several types <strong>of</strong> labor<strong>at</strong>ory equipment with<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmal performances between 2 and 20 kW as well as from a semi-technical plant<br />

<strong>of</strong> 300 kW. Figure 1 is a schem<strong>at</strong>ic drawing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shapes and dimensions <strong>of</strong> fluidized<br />

bed reactors used. Appar<strong>at</strong>us no. I is a tube reactor <strong>of</strong> 6 cm diameter and 60 cm<br />

height on top <strong>of</strong> which has been arranged a freeboard <strong>of</strong> approx. 35 cm hight and<br />

10 cm diameter. Appar<strong>at</strong>us no. 11 is a tube reactor <strong>of</strong> 6 cm diameter and about<br />

120 cm high. Here <strong>the</strong> ash is retained by an integr<strong>at</strong>ed inertial separ<strong>at</strong>or. Appar<strong>at</strong>us<br />

no. 111 represents a two-stage secondary air reactor with <strong>the</strong> following dimensions:<br />

lower section : 6 cm diameter, 60 crn high,<br />

upper section : 10 cm diameter, 80 cm high,<br />

integr<strong>at</strong>ing an inertial separ<strong>at</strong>or. Unit no. IV is a pressurized reactor allowing<br />

combustion <strong>pressures</strong> up to 10 bar. Its reaction tube has a diameter <strong>of</strong> 6 cm and a<br />

height <strong>of</strong> 1 m, and incorpor<strong>at</strong>es an inertial separ<strong>at</strong>or. An early version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

pressurized reactor, oper<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> 4.5 bar, was <strong>of</strong> a similar shape and size as<br />

appar<strong>at</strong>us no. 1. The reactor space provided by <strong>the</strong> semi-technical plant, finally,<br />

has a cross-section <strong>of</strong> 40 by 80 cm, a height <strong>of</strong> approx. 1 m, with a freeboard <strong>of</strong><br />

80 by 80 cm cross-section and approx. 2 m height.<br />

The <strong>coal</strong> is fed pneum<strong>at</strong>ically, along with all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion air, to <strong>the</strong> electri-<br />

cally pre-he<strong>at</strong>ed labor<strong>at</strong>ory units, whereas in <strong>the</strong> semi-technical plant <strong>coal</strong> is fed<br />

with a small fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total air from one side into <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed. The<br />

<strong>at</strong>mospheric labor<strong>at</strong>ory units, due to <strong>the</strong>ir high surface-to-volume r<strong>at</strong>io, are<br />

equipped with a he<strong>at</strong> insul<strong>at</strong>ion allowing to maintain a combustion temper<strong>at</strong>ure as<br />

high as approx . 950 OC. The pressurized unit, however, requires a variable he<strong>at</strong><br />

exchanger for <strong>the</strong>rmal discharge since in this case <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong> release r<strong>at</strong>e is higher<br />

by a factor <strong>of</strong> 10. As to <strong>the</strong> <strong>at</strong>mospheric semi-technical unit, it also needs he<strong>at</strong><br />

exchangers which are immersed in <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed.<br />

') The present project has been sponsored by <strong>the</strong> Federal Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Research and Technology (project no. ET 1024 B)<br />

218<br />

I


With regard to <strong>the</strong> similarity particularly <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labor<strong>at</strong>ory equipment to bigger plants,<br />

one had to compromise on this. On <strong>the</strong> one hand a contact time between gas and<br />

solids comparable to th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> a bigger fluidized bed plant had to be <strong>at</strong>tained which<br />

requires an adequ<strong>at</strong>e hei&t <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

performance was to be kept low, i .e. within <strong>the</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> a labor<strong>at</strong>ory unit. As a<br />

compromise between <strong>the</strong>se requirements resulted an elong<strong>at</strong>ed reactor shape which,<br />

seen under <strong>the</strong> aspect <strong>of</strong> flow mechanics, due to its high lengthldiameter r<strong>at</strong>io can<br />

<strong>at</strong> first view not be compared with a bigger plant since it tends to aggreg<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

fluidiz<strong>at</strong>ion and puls<strong>at</strong>ions. In order to be able to use <strong>the</strong>se easy to be handled<br />

reactors and to obtain reliable results none<strong>the</strong>less, elong<strong>at</strong>ed wire spirals were<br />

introduced in <strong>the</strong> reactor spaces. This helped to avoid <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> big bubbles<br />

and strong puls<strong>at</strong>ions and to bring about a more particul<strong>at</strong>ive fluidiz<strong>at</strong>ion (2).<br />

An essential design difference <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labor<strong>at</strong>ory units consists in <strong>the</strong> substitution<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enlarged cross-section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> free board by an inertial separ<strong>at</strong>or. The objec-<br />

tive <strong>of</strong> this constructional modific<strong>at</strong>ion is to determine <strong>the</strong> functionality and need <strong>of</strong><br />

such a high-volume free-board .<br />

2. Results<br />

The results were obtained from an evalu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> analysis on <strong>the</strong> feed m<strong>at</strong>erials, flue<br />

gases, ash, and from <strong>the</strong> m<strong>at</strong>erial balance <strong>of</strong> throughputs.<br />

Figure 2 is a schem<strong>at</strong>ic summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main oper<strong>at</strong>ional parameters,<br />

Including <strong>the</strong>ir range and direction <strong>of</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ion as well as relevant standard values<br />

plus qualit<strong>at</strong>ive effects on: specific he<strong>at</strong> release r<strong>at</strong>e, C-loss, CO-, SOz-, and NOx-<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ions in <strong>the</strong> flue gas.<br />

Depending on <strong>the</strong> slope and inflexion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> arrow indic<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> parameter<br />

vari<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> a given component, such vari<strong>at</strong>ion has a stronger or weaker<br />

influence on throughput and emission; a horizontal arrow stands for invariance in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> independent parameter. The specific he<strong>at</strong> release r<strong>at</strong>e, expressed as<br />

MW/m2, goes up along with both increasing fluidizing velocity and pressure, i.e.<br />

along with those parameters determing <strong>the</strong> throughput <strong>of</strong> air and also <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>. The<br />

performance drops along with rising excess air, i.e. in a situ<strong>at</strong>ion where an<br />

increasing proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> air throughput is no longer utilized. The o<strong>the</strong>r parameters,<br />

however, hardly exert any influence. The dependence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specific he<strong>at</strong><br />

release r<strong>at</strong>e on <strong>the</strong> appar<strong>at</strong>us design, <strong>the</strong>refore, is negligible and will be --<br />

with an excess <strong>of</strong> air % = 1.3 (5 % 0 in <strong>the</strong> flue gas) -- approx. 1.2 to 1.5 MW/rn2.<br />

This correspondends to <strong>the</strong> values whch in <strong>the</strong> meantime have been observed also<br />

<strong>at</strong> demonstr<strong>at</strong>ion plants (3). Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> arrow constell<strong>at</strong>ions revealing a sizeable<br />

influence are backed by measuring d<strong>at</strong>a plotted on diagrams, a selection <strong>of</strong> which<br />

is given hereunder.<br />

2.1. C-Loss and CO Emissions<br />

The C-loss is a critical factor for <strong>the</strong> economics <strong>of</strong> fluidized bed plants, whereas<br />

keeping <strong>the</strong> CO content in <strong>the</strong> flue gas within admissible limits generally does not<br />

pose any problems. As can be taken from figure 2, <strong>the</strong> two d<strong>at</strong>a sets are <strong>of</strong> a<br />

striking parallelity. The reason for this is th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> more CO will be gener<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong><br />

reduced temper<strong>at</strong>ures within <strong>the</strong> local and <strong>the</strong>rmal transition zone between reactor<br />

zone and flue gas duct, <strong>the</strong> more carbon passes through this transitional zone as<br />

char carry over, Tars and vol<strong>at</strong>ile hydrocarbons were not observed. On being<br />

introduced into <strong>the</strong> hot ash <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed, <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> will be dispersed<br />

immedi<strong>at</strong>ely and exposed to <strong>the</strong> excess air whose oxygen reacts first with <strong>the</strong><br />

vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter.<br />

219


Diminishing C-loss along with pressure rise is rel<strong>at</strong>ed to an increased 0<br />

tr<strong>at</strong>ion , whereas diminishing C-loss along with rising temper<strong>at</strong>ure is <strong>at</strong>tr?b%?:i<br />

higher reaction velocity. Increasing fluidizing velocities reduce <strong>the</strong> residence time<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> in <strong>the</strong> reactor and, thus, cause higher C-losses. If one found a means<br />

<strong>of</strong> extending this residence time -- be it by appropri<strong>at</strong>e plant design or/and b <strong>coal</strong><br />

prepar<strong>at</strong>ion -- <strong>the</strong> specific he<strong>at</strong> release r<strong>at</strong>e could be improved proportion<strong>at</strong>e& to<br />

<strong>the</strong> fluidizing velocity.<br />

A longer residence time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> by means <strong>of</strong> increased bed height will diminish<br />

C-losses , too.<br />

C-loss may be influenced also by <strong>coal</strong> prepar<strong>at</strong>ion measures. As shown on figure 3,<br />

<strong>the</strong> C-loss will, when fueling closely sized <strong>coal</strong> fractions, pass through a maximum<br />

as soon as <strong>the</strong> particle diameter approches <strong>the</strong> elutri<strong>at</strong>ion cut point. Coarse <strong>coal</strong><br />

grains will remain in <strong>the</strong> bed up to <strong>the</strong> moment where <strong>the</strong>y are burnt down to a<br />

size allowing <strong>the</strong>ir elutriution or preventing <strong>the</strong>m from being recycled by <strong>the</strong><br />

inertial separ<strong>at</strong>ors. With sufficiently small fractions (<strong>coal</strong> dust) <strong>the</strong> reaction time<br />

is apparently shorter than <strong>the</strong> residence time in <strong>the</strong> reactor space so th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

particles are almost completely burnt up. As far as industrial plants are concerned,<br />

<strong>the</strong> logical conclusion from this is to separ<strong>at</strong>e <strong>coal</strong> dust &om <strong>the</strong> coarser fractions<br />

and blow <strong>the</strong> dust pneum<strong>at</strong>ically into <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed from below, in order to allow<br />

a maximum residence time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dust and avoid erosion in <strong>the</strong> feed ducts, whereas<br />

<strong>the</strong> coarse fractions, being introduced from above, are allowed sufficient time to<br />

spread over <strong>the</strong> bed while being burnt up. In this case it can be taken from <strong>the</strong><br />

diagrams, e.g. figure 3, where <strong>the</strong> prepar<strong>at</strong>ion cut points for each specific plant<br />

are viz . which granular fraction should be separ<strong>at</strong>ed and lor fur<strong>the</strong>r comminuted.<br />

Examin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carbon carry-over by means <strong>of</strong> screening for its size distribution<br />

does not yield accur<strong>at</strong>e results since char aggreg<strong>at</strong>ions will disintegr<strong>at</strong>e. The results<br />

<strong>of</strong> figure 3 are, however, reconfirmed by this approxim<strong>at</strong>ive evalu<strong>at</strong>ion. Moreover it<br />

can be verified from fly ash separ<strong>at</strong>ion in two subsequent cyclones th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> fine dust<br />

from <strong>the</strong> second cyclone is very low in carbon, whereas <strong>the</strong> "coarse dust" <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

first one will always contain <strong>the</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unburnt carbon.<br />

Apart from <strong>the</strong> determinable and adjustable oper<strong>at</strong>ional parameters, C-loss is also a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specific plant parameters. Measuring d<strong>at</strong>a can best be reproduced in<br />

labor<strong>at</strong>ory equipment. When doing so, one observes o<strong>the</strong>r and so far not measurable<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ional conditions which bear on <strong>the</strong> results. Among <strong>the</strong>se have to be considered<br />

<strong>the</strong> size distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed ash particles which changes during opera-<br />

tion, or changing fluidity and cohesive <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed ash when adding<br />

various grad<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> limestone.<br />

A comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> C-loss measured in reactor no. 1 with th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> semi-technical<br />

Plant V (figure 5) -- <strong>the</strong> cross-section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> free-board has been enlarged in both<br />

units -- shows good coincidence. It should be borne in mind, however, th<strong>at</strong> here<br />

varying particle grad<strong>at</strong>ions and bed heights compens<strong>at</strong>e each o<strong>the</strong>r in a way not<br />

clearly identified so far.<br />

As was expected, <strong>the</strong>re are differences also in <strong>the</strong> C-losses for <strong>the</strong> different<br />

labor<strong>at</strong>ory reactor types since inertial separ<strong>at</strong>ors are not optimized. This is not<br />

disturbing as long as feed m<strong>at</strong>erials, viz. types <strong>of</strong> limestone and <strong>coal</strong>, are<br />

compared by measurements in one reactor only. As soon as it comes to scaling up<br />

results, however, one has to know about <strong>the</strong> reasons and influences <strong>of</strong> specific<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ional conditions.<br />

220


i<br />

\<br />

'<br />

2.2. soz Emission and NOx Emission<br />

St<strong>at</strong>ements on <strong>the</strong> pressure-dependences <strong>of</strong> SO and NO emissions (figure 2) are<br />

so far based on measurements <strong>of</strong> two pressure levels (13 and 4.5 bar). When<br />

moving to <strong>the</strong> higher pressure SO2 and NO emissions will be diminished by more<br />

than 50 %. The qualit<strong>at</strong>ive evalu<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> ea%y orient<strong>at</strong>ion tests on <strong>the</strong> new pressure<br />

appar<strong>at</strong>us IV where measurements <strong>at</strong> several <strong>pressures</strong> between 1 and 10 bar are<br />

to be carried out, do reconfirm this improvement.<br />

Fi re 10 shows <strong>the</strong> stroig dependence <strong>of</strong> SO emissions on <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> limestone<br />

*wed Ca/S r<strong>at</strong>io). It is, however, strhing and so far not explainable<br />

(figure 5) th<strong>at</strong> varying sizes <strong>of</strong> one same type <strong>of</strong> limestone lead to different temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

dependencies. Dolomite shows a similar behaviour (figure 6). When adding<br />

coarse m<strong>at</strong>erial, SO emission will slump with rising temper<strong>at</strong>ures, whereas <strong>the</strong><br />

opposite happens wgen m<strong>at</strong>erial <strong>of</strong> small grain sizes is added.<br />

Excess air (figure 7) has a weak influence on SO2 emission, while its effect on<br />

NOx emission is strong since in this case <strong>the</strong> oxygen concentr<strong>at</strong>ion is decisive for<br />

<strong>the</strong> conversion <strong>of</strong> th<strong>at</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> fuel-nitrogen which is transformed to NO. (Due<br />

to <strong>the</strong> low temper<strong>at</strong>ures in a fluidized bed plant, 10 to 30 % only <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fuel-nitrogen<br />

and no nitrogen from <strong>the</strong> air is converted to NO.) A lack <strong>of</strong> O2 favours ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

competing reaction which yields molecular N2.<br />

The dependencies <strong>of</strong> SO and NO emissions are mostly active in opposite directions<br />

(figure 2). A good insigit into tze conditions leading to NO form<strong>at</strong>ion is possible<br />

with <strong>the</strong> secondary air reactor. When plotting <strong>the</strong> NOx emission against different<br />

incremental primary airlsecondary air r<strong>at</strong>ios, a NO mmimum is met <strong>at</strong> a distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> primary versus secondary air <strong>of</strong> 50 : 50. This &fect was most obvious in reactor<br />

no. 1 (4), whereas it was less pronounced in <strong>the</strong> bigger reactor no. 111 where, <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> maximum emission values were reduced. The lowest values were<br />

abserved in <strong>the</strong> semi-technical reactor (figure 8); <strong>the</strong>y were in <strong>the</strong> same order <strong>of</strong><br />

magnitude which prevails also in o<strong>the</strong>r larger plants. From this may be concluded<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO emissions measured in <strong>the</strong> labor<strong>at</strong>ory reactors are <strong>at</strong>ypically high. The<br />

form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> coarse bubbles in big reactors bring about a certain distribution <strong>of</strong> O2<br />

as high as into <strong>the</strong> upper bed zones. Such by-pass effect can be compared with <strong>the</strong><br />

feed <strong>of</strong> secondary air. Consequently, <strong>the</strong> way how oxygen acts on <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and,<br />

possibly, <strong>the</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> reducing vol<strong>at</strong>ile <strong>coal</strong> components are main determinants<br />

for NO emission. Emissions from <strong>the</strong> semi-technical plant may be considered<br />

typicalXfor NO emissions from full-scale plants (figure 8), with 1 g NOZ/kWh<br />

being approxiz<strong>at</strong>ely equivalent to 200 ppm NO. So, even though <strong>the</strong> numerical values<br />

obtained from labor<strong>at</strong>ory measurements are exagger<strong>at</strong>ed in respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir absolute<br />

value and do not allow any generaliz<strong>at</strong>ion as to NOx emissions, one may none<strong>the</strong>less<br />

derive certain tendencies (e.g. dependence on excess air) which can be scaled-up<br />

to bigger plants.<br />

Typical figures for SO emissions cannot be identified since <strong>the</strong> main influential<br />

2<br />

factor on SO emission will be <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> limestone added. SO emission, <strong>the</strong>re-<br />

2<br />

fore, is only to a small extent typical for a given plant. Fi re 3 shows a dependence<br />

on <strong>the</strong> limestone/sulphur mole r<strong>at</strong>io when feeding di erent <strong>coal</strong>s high in ash<br />

and with varying sulphur contents, but adding one same limestone <strong>at</strong> <strong>pressures</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

1.1 and 4.5 bar. It is <strong>the</strong> spontaneous desulphuriz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>s ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

sulphur content which brings about <strong>the</strong> difference in SO emissions, -- emissions<br />

which on a labor<strong>at</strong>ory scsle can be reduced to zero. To And out <strong>the</strong> limestone with<br />

optimum sulphur capturing efficiency (i .e. accomplishing <strong>the</strong> desired desulphuriz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

with admixture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> possible minimum sorbent amount), some three dozens <strong>of</strong><br />

limestomes <strong>of</strong> different geological form<strong>at</strong>ions, deposits, and trade marks were tested<br />

(5). Geologically young and porous limestones appear to be best suited.<br />

221


Similar differences as to sulphur capturing <strong>properties</strong> can be observed also among<br />

dolomites. In this case only <strong>the</strong> CaCO, proportion acts as a sulphur capturing<br />

medium. Optimum desulphuriz<strong>at</strong>ion is a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> limestone particles<br />

(6). As can be seen on figure 10, limestone dust < 10 I.rm is an excellent sulphur<br />

capturing medium due to its big surface and thorough distribution in <strong>the</strong> fluidized<br />

bed and this notwithstanding its short residence time. Unlike this, <strong>the</strong> residence<br />

time <strong>of</strong> coarser fractions with a more reduced total surface is too short as to allow<br />

adequ<strong>at</strong>e reaction with SO,. Those particles, however, which are not elutri<strong>at</strong>ed and,<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore, accumul<strong>at</strong>e in <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed on having been fed continuously to it,<br />

provide again a very good sulphur capturing efficiency. As soon as particle size<br />

increase fur<strong>the</strong>r, however, this beneficial effect is lost again. Such loss <strong>of</strong> efficiency<br />

along with increasing panicle size is less pronounced with dolomite due to <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

th<strong>at</strong> here- <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> magnesium carbon<strong>at</strong>e enlarges <strong>the</strong> pore volume during<br />

combustion and this volume does not get blocked by sulph<strong>at</strong>e form<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

2.3. Halogen Emission<br />

At <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures prevailing in a fluidized bed plant, fluorides and chlorides as<br />

mineral components <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> are released as HF and HCl also in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong><br />

lime. Early results have shown th<strong>at</strong> on condition <strong>of</strong> low temper<strong>at</strong>ures in <strong>the</strong> flue gas<br />

duct, HF and HCl can be bound by lime-containing fluidized bed flue ash. Trials on<br />

an optimiz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se bonding conditions have been initi<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />

3. Summary<br />

The experiments on a labor<strong>at</strong>ory scale and in <strong>the</strong> semi-technical plant have releaved<br />

a considerable development potential for fluidized bed plants (7) as well as <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

th<strong>at</strong> tests on a smaller scale may sizeable contribute to this end so th<strong>at</strong> results from<br />

<strong>the</strong> different plants are appreci<strong>at</strong>ed as being complementary to each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

References<br />

( 1) Munzner , Heinrich : EinfluB von Betriebsparametern auf die Schadst<strong>of</strong>f-<br />

Emissionen einer Wirbelschichtfeuerung im LabormaBstab . VDI-Bericht Nr .266<br />

(1977), S. 79<br />

(2) Schilling, Hans-Dieter , Munzner , Heinrich, Bonn, Bernhard, Wiegand, getlef:<br />

Die Wirbelschichtfeuerung und ihre Bed eutung fur den Warmemarkt. Erdol und<br />

Kohle 9 (1981).<br />

(3) Langh<strong>of</strong>f, Josef, Kirschke , Hermann , Lemiesz, D., Marnitz , Chr . : Die Wirbel-<br />

schichtanlage Flingern - Aufbau und erste Betriebserfahrungen . Vortrag<br />

VGB-Fachtagung "Kohlefeuerung 1980" Essen, 21.11.1980, und Mannheim,<br />

5.12.1980.<br />

(4) Bonn, Bernhard , Miinzner , Heinrich : Schadst<strong>of</strong>femissionen bei Wirbelschicht-<br />

feuerungen. VDI-Bericht Nr. 322 (19781, S. 103/109<br />

(5) Munzner, Heinrich : Schwefelbindung an Kalk in Wirbelschichtfeuerungen.<br />

VDI-Bericht Nr. 345 (1979), S. 319/322<br />

(6) Munzner , Heinrich, Bonn, Bernhard: Sulfur Capturing Effectivity <strong>of</strong> Limestones<br />

and Dolomites in Fluidized Bed Combustion. Vortrag 6th Int'l Conference on<br />

Fluidized Bed Combustion, April 1980, Atlanta, USA.<br />

(7) Schilling, Hans-Dieter : Technischer Stand und wirtschaftliche Chancen der<br />

Wirbelschichtfeuerung zur Strom- und Warmeerzeugung aus Kohle .<br />

Chem.-1ng.-Techn. 51 (1979), Nr. 3, S. 184/191.<br />

222


223


-1<br />

9<br />

-<br />

!<br />

- _ -<br />

I<br />

224<br />

i


Figure 9: Sulphur captLTre as 0 function Of <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> limestone<br />

added per t.c.e.<br />

02 -5%<br />

0 6 IO 20 LO 60 100 2W 1006OOIOW i<br />

~)arlicIc sire Iu<br />

Figure lo: Sulphur capture as a function <strong>of</strong> limestone particle biz0<br />

225


INTRODUCTION<br />

SULFUR CAPTURE AND NITROGEN OXIDE REDUCTION<br />

ON THE 6' X 6' ATMOSPHERIC FLUIDIZED BED COMBUSTION TEST FACILITY<br />

T. M. Modrak and J. T. Tang<br />

The Babcock & Wilcox Company<br />

Research and Development Division<br />

Alliance Research Center<br />

Alliance, Ohio 44601<br />

C. J. Aulisio<br />

Electric Power Research Institute<br />

Palo Alto, California 94304<br />

Atmospheric fluidized bed combustion (AFBC) is being developed as a costeffective,<br />

low-polluting method <strong>of</strong> direct <strong>coal</strong> utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion for electric power<br />

gener<strong>at</strong>ion. An earlier st<strong>at</strong>e-<strong>of</strong>-<strong>the</strong>-art assessment (EPRI Final Report FP-308)<br />

concluded th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing AFBC d<strong>at</strong>a base was inadequ<strong>at</strong>e for <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong><br />

utility-scale units -- th<strong>at</strong> is, <strong>the</strong> available d<strong>at</strong>a vere limited in scope, and since<br />

<strong>the</strong>y had been derived mainly from labor<strong>at</strong>ory-scale equipment, it was doubtful<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y could be applied to <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> utility boilers. The need for a<br />

large, well- instrumented facility capable <strong>of</strong> long-term testing was clearly<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />

As a result, a 6-foot x 6-foot (6' x 6') AFBC Development Facility was built <strong>at</strong><br />

The Babcock & Wilcox Research Center in Alliance, Ohio. A complete description <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> facility design details are contained in EPKI Final Report CS-1688.<br />

PROJECT RESULTS<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 6' x 6' facility was completed in October 1977. Following<br />

a 5-month startup and debugging phase, <strong>the</strong> first test series was begun in April<br />

1978. Since <strong>the</strong>n, approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 2000 hours <strong>of</strong> testing per year have been logged <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> facility. The facility has demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> capability for long-term, steady-<br />

st<strong>at</strong>e oper<strong>at</strong>ion, with tests typically lasting from 300 to 500 hours. The AFBC unit<br />

is large enough to result in gas-solid residence times for <strong>the</strong> various zones <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

combustor th<strong>at</strong> are typical <strong>of</strong> those expected for utility-scale units. A wide range<br />

<strong>of</strong> conditions can be tested <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> facility. Also, <strong>the</strong> computerized d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

acquisition system has been shown to provide accur<strong>at</strong>e, comprehensive document<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> test results.<br />

226


P<br />

SUMMARY OF TESTS<br />

Testing completed as <strong>of</strong> July 1981, along with a short description <strong>of</strong> each test<br />

Series is Summarized below:<br />

Test<br />

seriee<br />

__<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

I1<br />

I2<br />

13<br />

14<br />

I5<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

- D<strong>at</strong>e<br />

Hay 1978<br />

June 1978<br />

Augur 1978<br />

September 1978<br />

November 1978<br />

February 1979<br />

Hareh 1979<br />

Hay 1979<br />

June 1979<br />

July 1979<br />

August 1979<br />

kcember 1979<br />

January 1980<br />

February 1980<br />

April 1980<br />

Hay 1980<br />

June 1980<br />

July 1980<br />

October 1980<br />

December 1980<br />

January 1981<br />

March 1981<br />

June 1981<br />

H0"rS<br />

Firing<br />

Coal<br />

-<br />

277<br />

248<br />

278<br />

241<br />

204<br />

406<br />

171<br />

427<br />

298<br />

194<br />

96<br />

265<br />

318<br />

277<br />

382<br />

147<br />

344<br />

326<br />

365<br />

344<br />

170<br />

380<br />

485<br />

comments<br />

lnitial characteriz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Long dur<strong>at</strong>ion test to characterize performance<br />

Recycle<br />

Coal sire "Bri<strong>at</strong>ion, temper<strong>at</strong>ure Vari<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Limestone and <strong>coal</strong> sire vari<strong>at</strong>ion, temper<strong>at</strong>ure Vari<strong>at</strong>iOO<br />

New distrlbvtor pl<strong>at</strong>e, B<strong>at</strong>telle emiseion testing - Pittsburgh t8 <strong>coal</strong><br />

Single cod feed point - 36 ft2, bed depth vari<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>coal</strong> and limestone vari<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Recycle; underbed single point. temper<strong>at</strong>ure vari<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Coal si*e "Bri<strong>at</strong>io", ternperamre vari<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Recycle; overbed and 4-point underbed with <strong>coal</strong> and limestone<br />

Pulverized eaal<br />

New in-bed tube bundle, new baghouse, GCA emission testing - Pittsburgh 18 <strong>coal</strong><br />

Recycle; underbed single point. limeetme sire vari<strong>at</strong>ion, excess transport air<br />

Recycle; underbed single point and overbed. slumped bed he<strong>at</strong> transfer study test<br />

Fuller Kinyon pump characrerir<strong>at</strong>ion. baghouse recycle, lignite te<strong>at</strong><br />

Turndown (slumping) tes~<br />

Limestone size vari<strong>at</strong>ion, center recycle<br />

New di8tribvtcir pl<strong>at</strong>e. 4 ftlaee characteriz<strong>at</strong>ion test<br />

4 ftleec testing, recycle<br />

Feed nozzle design testing. 8 ftlaee<br />

Feed nozzle design testing, 8 ftlsec<br />

NO reductio. te<strong>at</strong>#<br />

12 ftlsec testing<br />

Significant d<strong>at</strong>a were gener<strong>at</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> fly ash recycle, <strong>coal</strong> particle<br />

size, limestone particle size, 5 ft/sec, 8 ft/sec, and 12 ft/sec fluidizing velocity<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ion, combustion <strong>of</strong> lignite, and nitrogen oxide reduction. Testing continued<br />

to emphasize fly ash recycle as a means <strong>of</strong> improving combustion efficiency and<br />

sulfur capture. In addition to center underbed recycle, overbed recycle with<br />

gravity and pneum<strong>at</strong>ic feed as well as baghouse ash recycle configur<strong>at</strong>ions were<br />

tested. Recycled fly ash testing continued to result in combustion efficiencies on<br />

<strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> 98%. The highly successful lignite test resulted in combustion<br />

efficiencies approaching 99%. The lignite test proved <strong>the</strong> capability <strong>of</strong> a fluidized<br />

bed combustor (FBC) to combust fuels which can be troublesome. One test was devoted<br />

to testing feed nozzles designed to prevent feedline pluggage during slumping. A<br />

power outage simul<strong>at</strong>ion test was also carried out. The test was designed to<br />

determine minimum flow r<strong>at</strong>es through <strong>the</strong> in-bed tube bundle required to prevent tube<br />

overhe<strong>at</strong>ing during a power outage. Results indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> tube overhe<strong>at</strong>ing may be<br />

prevented with minimal design consider<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

Tests were also conducted to evalu<strong>at</strong>e bed height reduction as a means <strong>of</strong> load<br />

control in an AFBC facility. These variable bed height tests provided <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

needed to design an autom<strong>at</strong>ic load control system th<strong>at</strong> will be installed on <strong>the</strong><br />

6' x 6' in 1982.<br />

One series <strong>of</strong> tests was devoted to two-stage combustion, i.e., allowing a<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forced draft air to bypass <strong>the</strong> bed, recombining with <strong>the</strong> fluidizing<br />

gas in <strong>the</strong> freeboard region. These tests, aimed <strong>at</strong> NO reduction, are discussed<br />

l<strong>at</strong>er in this paper.<br />

A significant amount <strong>of</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a covering AFBC have been gener<strong>at</strong>ed on <strong>the</strong> 6' x 6'.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se d<strong>at</strong>a have been summarized and discussed in various technical papers<br />

227


and, <strong>the</strong>refore, will not be repe<strong>at</strong>ed in this paper. Sulfur capture and nitrogen<br />

oxide reduction are <strong>the</strong> two items th<strong>at</strong> will be discussed in <strong>the</strong> following sections.<br />

SULFUR CAPTURE<br />

No Fly Ash Recycle<br />

Numerous non-recycle tests have been run on <strong>the</strong> 6' x 6' AFBC <strong>at</strong> a fluidizing<br />

velocity near 8 ft/sec. This large d<strong>at</strong>a bank provides inform<strong>at</strong>ion enabling a better<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> sulfur capture with various oper<strong>at</strong>ing parameters. A plot <strong>of</strong><br />

percent sulfur removal versus calcium-to-sulfur r<strong>at</strong>io showed th<strong>at</strong> sulfur removal is<br />

a strong function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> fresh limestone feed (Figure 1). However, <strong>the</strong><br />

d<strong>at</strong>a is quite sc<strong>at</strong>tered, indic<strong>at</strong>ing th<strong>at</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r factors such as particle size,<br />

entrainment loss, bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure, <strong>coal</strong> combustion, and sulfur release level may<br />

also have a significant influence on sulfur capture efficiency. To more thoroughly<br />

investig<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong>se factors, d<strong>at</strong>a from a narrow range <strong>of</strong> Ca/S r<strong>at</strong>io were subjected to<br />

analysis. Sulfur removal was shown to be rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> limestone being fed<br />

into <strong>the</strong> unit (Figure 2). The plot indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> larger limestone feed sizes<br />

result in a decreased ability to remove sulfur, a trend which is most pronounced <strong>at</strong><br />

higher Ca/S values. This suggests th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fresh limestone feed is<br />

predominant since <strong>the</strong> spent bed lime utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong>se tests range between 23%<br />

and 40%. Consequently, <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sulfur capture for <strong>the</strong> bed m<strong>at</strong>erial is many<br />

times smaller than for freshly calcined limestone <strong>at</strong> all size ranges th<strong>at</strong> exist<br />

within <strong>the</strong> FBC unit. For average limestone feed sizes below 1200 microns<br />

(weight-mass average), a significant drop in sulfur retention occurred as a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> high elutri<strong>at</strong>ion loss <strong>of</strong> limestone feed. Fur<strong>the</strong>r analyses were performed by<br />

restricting both <strong>the</strong> Ca/S r<strong>at</strong>io and limestone feed size. The d<strong>at</strong>a sc<strong>at</strong>ter, evident<br />

in Figure 2, was found to be rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> bed particle size, extent <strong>of</strong><br />

bed lime utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion, and bed voidage (Figures 3 and 4). Sulfur removal decreases<br />

with:<br />

1. An increase in bed particle size for a narrow range <strong>of</strong> bed lime<br />

.utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion (0.30 - 0.33).<br />

2. High bed lime utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

3. Higher bed voidage.<br />

Also, spent bed lime utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion is rel<strong>at</strong>ed to both residence time and Ca/S feed<br />

r<strong>at</strong>io, reaching 35% with a residence time <strong>of</strong> 13 hours <strong>at</strong> a Ca/S <strong>of</strong> 2.5 (Figure 5).<br />

Increasing <strong>the</strong> fluidizing velocity to 12 ft/sec resulted in lower sulfur<br />

capture, as shown in Table 1. We believe <strong>the</strong> causes <strong>of</strong> this reduction to be:<br />

1) higher elutri<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> limestone from <strong>the</strong> bed, and 2) increased freeboard<br />

combustion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and its vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter. The table shows th<strong>at</strong> carbon and<br />

limestone carryover losses were 12% and 55%, respectively. These are about 50% and<br />

34% more than <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>at</strong> 8 ft/sec, respectively.<br />

Reducing fluidizing velocity to about 5 ft/sec generally resulted in an<br />

improvement in sulfur capture. This was due to smaller limestone feed size and<br />

lower elutri<strong>at</strong>ion loss (Table 2).<br />

40%.<br />

In addition, spent bed lime utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion reached<br />

228


I<br />

Table 1<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> Sulfur Capture Efficiency and NOK Emissions<br />

for 8 ftlsec and 12 ftlsec Fluidizing Velocities<br />

Under Similar Conditions <strong>of</strong>: 1) Non-Recycle and 2) Ca/S : 2.4 - 2.8<br />

- Item<br />

%SO2 Capture<br />

Combustion Efficiency - Z<br />

NOx - ppm<br />

co - ppm<br />

Bed Voidage<br />

Limestone Feed Sire<br />

(weight mean average)<br />

Spent Bed Sire<br />

(weight mean average)<br />

Spent Bed Lime Utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion - X<br />

Elutri<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Available<br />

Lime Per Limestone Feed<br />

Elutri<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Carbon<br />

Per Carbon Feed From Coal<br />

Table 2<br />

Fluidizing Velocity<br />

8 ftlsec 12 ftlsec<br />

78.5 46.2<br />

92 88<br />

285 158<br />

106 1696<br />

0.62 0.72<br />

2908p 984P<br />

233711 127911<br />

31<br />

29<br />

41 55<br />

8 I2<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> Sulfur Capture Efficiency and NO Emissions<br />

for 5 ftlsec and 8 ft/sec Fluidizing Velocihs<br />

Under Similar Conditions <strong>of</strong>: 1) Non-Recycle and 2) Ca/S : 1.6 - 1.8<br />

- Item<br />

XS02 Capture<br />

Combustion Efficiency - %<br />

Spent Bed Lime Utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion - X<br />

Z Carbon in Carryover<br />

Per Carbon Feed<br />

NOx - 1bIHKb<br />

Bed Voidage<br />

Limestone Feed Size<br />

(weight mean average)<br />

Spent Bed Size<br />

(weight mean average)<br />

CO in Stack Gas - ppm<br />

229<br />

Fluidizing Velocity<br />

5 ftlsec 8 ftlsec<br />

58 54<br />

94 92<br />

40 33<br />

7.7 9.6<br />

0.22 0.39<br />

0.55 0.66<br />

815p 12oop<br />

923p 82411<br />

173 126


Fly Ash Recycle<br />

Oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 6' x 6' since May 1979 has emphasized fly ash recycle<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ion. Recycle has generally improved sulfur capture as shown on Figure 6.<br />

Generally speaking, for a given test condition and a narrow range <strong>of</strong> limestone to<br />

<strong>coal</strong> feed r<strong>at</strong>e, one expects <strong>the</strong> total available mole <strong>of</strong> calcium to each mole <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

sulfur to increase as <strong>the</strong> recycle r<strong>at</strong>io (recycle r<strong>at</strong>e/<strong>coal</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e) increases (Figure<br />

7a). The total available calcium oxide is defined as <strong>the</strong> combined calcium oxide<br />

from <strong>the</strong> limestone feed and <strong>the</strong> unreacted calcium oxide in <strong>the</strong> recycle stream; it is<br />

design<strong>at</strong>ed as (CaO)R + (CaO)L. The available calcium oxide can change by varying<br />

<strong>the</strong> limestone feed r<strong>at</strong>e or <strong>the</strong> recycle r<strong>at</strong>io.<br />

Figure 7b is a plot <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expected trend <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> recycle r<strong>at</strong>io on<br />

sulfur capture for two different Ca/S feed r<strong>at</strong>ios. Ideally, for a given set <strong>of</strong><br />

conditions, sulfur capture should increase with increasing recycle r<strong>at</strong>io due to an<br />

increase in <strong>the</strong> total available calcium-to-sulfur r<strong>at</strong>io. The r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> increase in<br />

sulfur capture (slope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> curve) will gradually diminish as <strong>the</strong> reactivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

recycled lime decreases due to higher calcium utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion. As <strong>the</strong> curve begins to<br />

level <strong>of</strong>f, a point is reached beyond which any fur<strong>the</strong>r increase in <strong>the</strong> recycle r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

has little benefit on sulfur capture. The recycle r<strong>at</strong>io for which this occurs<br />

should increase as:<br />

1. The particle size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recycle stream decreases since <strong>the</strong> smaller<br />

lime size results in better reactivity <strong>at</strong> higher calcium utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

levels.<br />

2. The limestone feed r<strong>at</strong>e increases (higher Ca/S r<strong>at</strong>io). High<br />

limestone feed r<strong>at</strong>es generally result in gre<strong>at</strong>er elutri<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

freshly calcined limestone. This helps to increase <strong>the</strong> reactivity <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> recycle stream, thus promoting SO2 capture.<br />

3. The reactivity <strong>of</strong> recycled lime improves. The improvement can be<br />

achieved through ei<strong>the</strong>r grinding or partial hydr<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

The recycle analysis was conducted by first choosing all tests with and without<br />

recycle. The d<strong>at</strong>a were compared by restricting <strong>the</strong> Ca/S feed r<strong>at</strong>ios to narrow<br />

ranges. Figure 8 shows th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> available calcium-to-sulfur r<strong>at</strong>io, [(CaO) +<br />

(CaO),l/S, increases dram<strong>at</strong>ically as <strong>the</strong> recycle-to-feed r<strong>at</strong>io is increaseh.<br />

9 shows <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> recycle on sulfur capture <strong>at</strong> three Ca/S r<strong>at</strong>ios. Figure 10<br />

shows th<strong>at</strong> 90% sulfur capture can be obtained <strong>at</strong> a recycle-to-<strong>coal</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> about<br />

1.3 with a Ca/S feed r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> 2.5 - 2.9.<br />

By extrapol<strong>at</strong>ion, a recycle r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> about 4 - 5 will be required <strong>at</strong> a Ca/S<br />

feed r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> 1.5 - 2.0.<br />

Figure<br />

Figure 11 shows sulfur capture as a function <strong>of</strong> fluidizing velocity for both<br />

<strong>the</strong> non-recycle and recycle oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions. Note <strong>the</strong> significant decrease<br />

(approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 20 percentage points) in sulfur capture for <strong>the</strong> high fluidizing<br />

velocity (12 ft/sec) tests as compared to <strong>the</strong> 8 ft/sec tests. The major reason for<br />

this reduction is <strong>at</strong>tributed to <strong>the</strong> increased freeboard combustion. This, <strong>of</strong><br />

course, causes more sulfur release in <strong>the</strong> freeboard.<br />

230


,<br />

NITROGEN OXIDE REDUCTION<br />

Single-Stage Combustion<br />

The mechanism <strong>of</strong> NO form<strong>at</strong>ion in an AFBC unit is extremely complic<strong>at</strong>ed,<br />

involving <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion 2nd destruction <strong>of</strong> NO through various chemical reactions<br />

th<strong>at</strong> occur in <strong>the</strong> bed and in <strong>the</strong> freeboard. Thus, it depends upon <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

devol<strong>at</strong>iz<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e and its vol<strong>at</strong>ile content, excess air, bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure, CO and<br />

SO2 concentr<strong>at</strong>ions in <strong>the</strong> emulsion phase, and <strong>the</strong> bed hydrodynamics.<br />

At 0 ft/sec fluidizing velocity, NO emissions were generally in <strong>the</strong> 300 ppm -<br />

400 ppm range. However <strong>at</strong> 5 ft/sec, <strong>the</strong>50<br />

following mechanisms as noted by Exxon [I]:<br />

was found to change with <strong>the</strong> Ca/S feed<br />

\ r<strong>at</strong>io as shown on Figure 12. It is believe3 th<strong>at</strong> this effect is a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

I<br />

CaO + SO2 -+ CaSO<br />

3<br />

CaS03 + 2NO -+ CaS03 (NO)2<br />

CaS03 -+ CaS04 + N2 + 1/2 O2<br />

As pointed out by Exxon's study, <strong>the</strong> above mechanisms could only occur in <strong>the</strong><br />

presence <strong>of</strong> sulf<strong>at</strong>ed lime and with a deficit <strong>of</strong> oxygen. The r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> NO reduction<br />

was found to be directly proportional to concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> both NO and 50, in <strong>the</strong><br />

gas phase as follows:<br />

- = K (S02)m<br />

W dt<br />

Where W is <strong>the</strong> bed weight and n has a value between 0.53 - 0.67 for <strong>the</strong><br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure range <strong>of</strong> 1400' - 1600°F. The proposed mechanisms qualit<strong>at</strong>ively appear<br />

to provide an explan<strong>at</strong>ion to our observ<strong>at</strong>ion for <strong>the</strong> low velocity tests. It is<br />

generally believed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ively smaller spent bed size in <strong>the</strong>se tests<br />

resulted in a fast bubbling bed with <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ive excess gas velocity (U - U<br />

ranging from 8 to 12. Consequently, a majority <strong>of</strong> oxygen along with air W O U ~<br />

bypass <strong>the</strong> emulsion phase via <strong>the</strong> bubble phase, resulting in a reducing <strong>at</strong>mosphere<br />

in <strong>the</strong> emulsion phase th<strong>at</strong> enhanced <strong>the</strong> NO<br />

proposed by Exxon.<br />

reduction through <strong>the</strong> mechanisms<br />

)/u rnf '<br />

The NO emission d<strong>at</strong>a taken from non-recycle tests with Ohio t6 <strong>coal</strong> and<br />

8 ft/sec flcidizing velocity appeared rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing excess air. However,<br />

<strong>the</strong> results were quite sc<strong>at</strong>tered, especially <strong>at</strong> levels below 25% excess air (Figure<br />

13). These sc<strong>at</strong>tered NO d<strong>at</strong>a were found to be associ<strong>at</strong>ed strongly to <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> reducing condition 1: AFBC where <strong>the</strong> NO level was usually below 200 ppm if <strong>the</strong><br />

CO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> stack gas exceeded 200 ppm (Figure 14). Fur<strong>the</strong>r analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> high NO emissions were associ<strong>at</strong>ed closely with <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

voidage, where <strong>the</strong> effect became mole pronounced <strong>at</strong> higher oxidizing conditions<br />

(Figure 15).<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> carbon loading in <strong>the</strong> freeboard on NOx reduction was quite<br />

evident <strong>at</strong> a high fluidizing velocity (12 ft/sec) and a recycle r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> 1.0 - 1.4.<br />

emissions from 0.43 to 0.23 lb/million Btu was observed (Figure<br />

A reduction Of NO<br />

16) as carbon loa2ing increased from 14% to 19%.<br />

231


Two-Stage Combustion<br />

Staged combustion has been proposed as a means <strong>of</strong> reducing NO from an AFBc<br />

unit. Several investig<strong>at</strong>ors [2, 3, and 41 have conducted tests to'quantify <strong>the</strong> NO<br />

reduction with staging. However, <strong>the</strong>se tests were run in small units and only<br />

overall effects were measured. To aid in evalu<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> staging on NO<br />

reduction and performance variables, <strong>the</strong> 6' x 6' AFBC facility was modified to aylow<br />

air injection <strong>at</strong> an elev<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> 96 inches above <strong>the</strong> distributor pl<strong>at</strong>e. This<br />

elev<strong>at</strong>ion was chosen based on d<strong>at</strong>a from previous tests [21. Two injection ports --<br />

on opposite walls <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unit -- were installed with valves to control flow and an<br />

orifice to measure flow.<br />

Tests were conducted <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> conditions listed in Table 3.<br />

ConditionIVariable<br />

Bed Temp, *F<br />

Bed Height - inches<br />

Table 3<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> Oper<strong>at</strong>ing Conditions and Measured Performance Variables<br />

Superficial Velocity - ftlsec<br />

Coal Feed - lblhr<br />

CaIS R<strong>at</strong>io<br />

Recycle - lblhr<br />

In-Bed Air Flov - lblhr<br />

Overbed Air Plov - lblhr<br />

Flue Gas<br />

o2 - x<br />

SO2 - ppm<br />

CO - ppm<br />

NOx - ppm<br />

Sulfur Capture - 2<br />

Combustion Efficiency - I<br />

- la<br />

1564<br />

51.8<br />

7.3<br />

1887<br />

2.7<br />

2560<br />

19500<br />

2.9<br />

0<br />

170<br />

208<br />

416<br />

91.6<br />

98.1<br />

- Ib<br />

1546<br />

52.5<br />

8.0<br />

2042<br />

2.7<br />

2680<br />

21500<br />

0<br />

2.9<br />

265<br />

185<br />

372<br />

86.1<br />

97.4<br />

Test<br />

- 2a -<br />

1544 1547<br />

50.0 49.8<br />

7.1 7.1<br />

2070 2064<br />

2.1 2.5<br />

2800 2920<br />

19400 19400<br />

2300 2300<br />

2.9<br />

562<br />

247<br />

195<br />

77.1<br />

96.8<br />

- 2b<br />

3.1<br />

527<br />

203<br />

175<br />

75.1<br />

96.7<br />

- 3a<br />

1512<br />

47.7<br />

6.5<br />

2192<br />

2.7<br />

2280<br />

18300<br />

4850<br />

2.9<br />

46 1<br />

248<br />

88<br />

74.9<br />

96.0<br />

- 3b<br />

1553<br />

47.8<br />

7.0<br />

2228<br />

2.5<br />

2280<br />

18900<br />

4670<br />

At each test condition, gas traverses were made <strong>at</strong> six heights along <strong>the</strong><br />

centerline <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unit. The gas concentr<strong>at</strong>ion pr<strong>of</strong>iles obtained in-bed (16 inches<br />

above <strong>the</strong> distributor pl<strong>at</strong>e) are shown on Figure 17. Note <strong>the</strong> peak in O2 and <strong>the</strong><br />

drop in o<strong>the</strong>r gas concentr<strong>at</strong>ions near <strong>the</strong> 36-inch insertion depth. This is probably<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> recycle stream which is being injected with transport air <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> 36-inch<br />

distance. Pr<strong>of</strong>iles above <strong>the</strong> bed (in <strong>the</strong> freeboard) were considerably more uniform.<br />

An integr<strong>at</strong>ed average <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile obtained <strong>at</strong> each elev<strong>at</strong>ion was calcul<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />

This average was <strong>the</strong>n plotted versus distance above <strong>the</strong> distributor pl<strong>at</strong>e for CO,<br />

SO2, and NO as shown on Figures 18, 19, and 20. There are several points th<strong>at</strong> are<br />

readily appzrent from <strong>the</strong>se figures.<br />

2.7<br />

458<br />

248<br />

117<br />

76. I<br />

96.1<br />

0 With zero overbed air, <strong>the</strong>re is a significant reaction occurring in<br />

<strong>the</strong> freeboard, e.g., reduction <strong>of</strong> CO and NO<br />

X.<br />

0 Two-stage combustion produces <strong>the</strong> expected trends in reducing NO<br />

while increasing SO2 and CO in <strong>the</strong> bed.<br />

232


0 The addition <strong>of</strong> air <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> 96-inch elev<strong>at</strong>ion allows fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Combustion to occur in <strong>the</strong> freeboard, thus increasing SO2 and<br />

reducing CO and NOx.<br />

0<br />

Reducing <strong>the</strong> NOx level in <strong>the</strong> bed reduces NOx throughout <strong>the</strong> process.<br />

0 Gas concentr<strong>at</strong>ions measured <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> 240-inch elev<strong>at</strong>ion, using <strong>the</strong><br />

freeboard sampling system and analysers, agree remarkably well with<br />

<strong>the</strong> similar, but completely separ<strong>at</strong>e, furnace outlet system and<br />

analysers.<br />

Figure 21 shows a plot <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> furnace outlet NO and SO gas concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong><br />

2<br />

<strong>the</strong> three test conditions -- 0%, lo%, and 20% overbe8 air.<br />

CONCLUDING REMARKS<br />

Twenty-three test series have been completed on <strong>the</strong> 6' x 6' AFBC Development<br />

Facility covering over 7100 hours <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion. D<strong>at</strong>a obtained thus far have clearly<br />

shown th<strong>at</strong> fly ash recycle can improve combustion efficiency to <strong>the</strong> level needed for<br />

commercial oper<strong>at</strong>ion. Recycle also improves sorbent utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion, thus reducing <strong>the</strong><br />

limestone needed for sulfur capture. Measured NO emission levels from <strong>the</strong> 6' x 6'<br />

AFBC unit are well below current EPA limits. Howgver, two-stage combustion tests<br />

have shown th<strong>at</strong> NO can be reduced to about 0.15 lb/million Btu. Additional work<br />

needs to be complered to improve Sulfur capture and combustion efficiency with<br />

two-stage combustion.<br />

Inform<strong>at</strong>ion obtained thus far has allowed a significant improvement in our<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AFBC process and should prove useful to researchers in this<br />

field. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, design <strong>of</strong> prototype hardware and o<strong>the</strong>r equipment developed and<br />

tested on <strong>the</strong> 6' x 6' should prove useful for commercial design.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

(11 G. A. Hammons and A. Skoop, "NO Form<strong>at</strong>ion and Control in Fluidized Bed Coal<br />

Combustion Processes," presentea <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Washington,<br />

DC; November 28 - December 2, 1971.<br />

[2]<br />

J. T<strong>at</strong>ebayashi, Y. Okada, K. Yano, and S. Ikeda, ."Simultaneous NO and SO2<br />

Emission Reduction With Fluidized Bed Combustion", 6th Intern<strong>at</strong>iogal Conference<br />

on Fluidized Bed Combustion, Atlanta, GA; April 1980.<br />

131 T. Hirama, M. Tomita, T. Adachi, and M. Horio, "An Experimental Study for Low<br />

NO Fluidized-Bed Combustor Development 2 - Performance <strong>of</strong> Two Stage<br />

FlEidized-Bed Combustion"; EST, Vol. 14, No. 88; pp. 960-965.<br />

[4] T. E. Taylor, "NO Control Through Staged Combustion in Fluidized Bed<br />

Combustion Systemg", 6th Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion,<br />

Atlanta, GA; April 1980.<br />

233


90-<br />

2<br />

E 80-<br />

c 10-<br />

c<br />

E<br />

60-<br />

n<br />

60-<br />

2 10-<br />

+ A<br />

E<br />

w-<br />

60<br />

NO RECYCLE<br />

OHIO V6 COAL<br />

I / I I I I<br />

(0<br />

1w 1.60 1.w 1.60 3.w 3.50<br />

us<br />

Figure 1 Sulfur<br />

r=-:+*\:<br />

Capture as a Function <strong>of</strong> Calcium/Sulfur (Ca/S) Feed R<strong>at</strong>io<br />

I-<br />

SUPERFICIAL GAS VELOCITY - 6 FTISEC<br />

onio *e COAL<br />

w-<br />

0 1.3 < WS < 1.0<br />

A 1.6


m-<br />

Y<br />

i? 4: BO<br />

n<br />

8<br />

c<br />

Y<br />

l0-<br />

Bo-<br />

I I I I<br />

0.660 0.670 0.5~) o . 6 ~ 0.m 0.810 0.6m 0.- o<br />

0.1BO r<br />

BED VOIDAGE<br />

Figure4 Sulfur Capture as a Function <strong>of</strong> Bed Voidage<br />

- 0- LI


RECYCLEIFEED<br />

(11 TOTAL AVAILABLE CALCIUM PER SULFUR RATIO VERSUS RECYCLE RATIO<br />

(IGOILBl - HIGH<br />

,I---<br />

/ lDpLl DECREASE OR<br />

IMPROVED LIME REACTIVITY<br />

[ICA, + IC&lR!A<br />

IMPROVED LIME REACTIVITY<br />

(bl EFFECTS OF THE TOTAL AVAILAILE CALCIUM PER SULFUR RATIO ON PERCENT SO2 CAPTURE0<br />

15<br />

Figure 7 Effect <strong>of</strong> Recycle on Sulfur Capture<br />

SUPERFICIAL GAS VELOCITY: B FTBEC<br />

ALL RECYCLE TESTS<br />

BED TEMP 150&15W°F<br />

Gd: 03.2-31<br />

n2.s - 2.9<br />

01s-2.0<br />

0.000 0.200 0.400 0.800 OdOD 1.W 1.m<br />

RECYCLEIFEED RATIO<br />

Figure 8 Effect <strong>of</strong> Recycle on <strong>the</strong> Available Calcium to Suiiur R<strong>at</strong>io<br />

236


E! w<br />

2<br />

z<br />

e<br />

Y<br />

100 -<br />

3<br />

t<br />

5 80-<br />

0,<br />

40<br />

SUPERFICIAL GAS VELOCITV 8 FTlSEC<br />

ALL RECYCLE TESTS<br />

IEO TEMP: 15W-1690aF<br />

W; 0 3.2 - 3.5<br />

A 2.6 -1.9<br />

0 1.8-20<br />

[laolL + tcalRys<br />

Figure 9 Effect <strong>of</strong> Available Calcium to Sulfur (Recycle) on Sulfur Capture<br />

100<br />

.-- A<br />

>/- A<br />

A-A-<br />

80!)><br />

A<br />

A 0<br />

A P<br />

0<br />

SUPERFICIAL GAS VELOCITY: B FT/SEC<br />

"V ALL RECYCLE TESTS<br />

BE0 TEMP: lSW-16W"F<br />

UJ: 0 3.2-3.8<br />

A 2.6 - 2.9<br />

0 1.6 - 2.0<br />

' 1 # 1 1 ' * 1 ' 1 ' ) 1 1 1<br />

237<br />

a<br />

m


0<br />

I I I I I I<br />

2 4 (I I IO 12<br />

SUPERFICIAL VELOCITY - FTBEC<br />

Figure 11 Sulfur Capture as a Function <strong>of</strong> Fluidizing Velocity<br />

I<br />

' g.m .<br />

Sml I<br />

1 2M<br />

1w<br />

I 6<br />

LOW GAS VELOCITY<br />

FTlSEC<br />

- 0 NO RECYCLE<br />

A RECYCLE<br />

A<br />

0<br />

L I I I I<br />

OHIO #E COAL<br />

SUPERFICIAL GAS VELOCITY - 8 FTlSEO<br />

%<br />

n AA<br />

b<br />

AA !A I<br />

10 16 20 26 39 s 4a 46<br />

EXCESS AIR - PERCENT<br />

Figure 13 Nitrogen Oxide as a Function <strong>of</strong> Excess Air<br />

238


0 f 0.so o'm:<br />

0.300<br />

0.zo<br />

-<br />

-<br />

A<br />

5m<br />

4M<br />

OHIO 16 COAL<br />

SUPERFICIAL GAS VELOCITY - 8 FTISEC<br />

50 1w 150 a0<br />

m-m<br />

Figure 14 Nitrogen Oxide as a Function <strong>of</strong> Carbon Monoxide<br />

U<br />

200 I I ' 1 ' I I I ' 1 ' I<br />

0.m 0.580 0.m 0.820 0.044 0.684 0.080<br />

SED VOIOAGE<br />

Figure 15 Nitrogen Oxide as a Function <strong>of</strong> Bed Voidage<br />

\;<br />

\ A EXCESS AIR 1tSX<br />

PITTSBURGH At8 COAL<br />

5W m


H --<br />

I<br />

z<br />

P<br />

t<br />

5 3om-<br />

0<br />

?i<br />

8<br />

am-<br />

0<br />

I I I I I I<br />

12 24 2a 48 m n<br />

DISTANCE INTO FURNACE - INCHES<br />

Figure 17 Gas Concentr<strong>at</strong>ion Pr<strong>of</strong>iles - In-Bed<br />

(16 Inches Above <strong>the</strong> Distributor Pl<strong>at</strong>e)<br />

DISTANCE ABOVE DISTRIBUTOR PLATE - INCHES<br />

PERCENT OVERBED AIR<br />

0- 0<br />

A- 20<br />

Figure 18 Average Carbon Monoxide Concentr<strong>at</strong>ion as a Function <strong>of</strong><br />

Distance Above <strong>the</strong> Distributor Pl<strong>at</strong>e<br />

240<br />

48-INCH BED<br />

lESO°F BED TEMP<br />

w-26<br />

WITH RECYCLE<br />

OUTLET


&e- -A \<br />

\ \<br />

:<br />

ERCENT OVERBED AIR<br />

I 1:<br />

0-10<br />

48-INCH BED<br />

lSSO°F BED TEMP<br />

CdS - 2.6<br />

WITH RECYCLE<br />

0 1 8 P U I 88 160 FUR1 \CE<br />

OUT1 T<br />

DISTANCE ABOVE DISTRIBUTOR PUTE - INCH<br />

Figure 19 Average Sulfur Dioxide Concentr<strong>at</strong>ion as a Function <strong>of</strong><br />

Distance Above <strong>the</strong> Distributor Pl<strong>at</strong>e<br />

I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I<br />

10 32 40 m im 110 FUR<br />

DU1<br />

DISTANCE ABOVE DISTRIBUTOR PLATE - INCHES<br />

Figure 20 Average Nitrogen Oxide Concentr<strong>at</strong>ion asa Function <strong>of</strong><br />

Distance Above <strong>the</strong> Distributor Pl<strong>at</strong>e<br />

241<br />

CE<br />

r


600<br />

0<br />

o----o so1<br />

/<br />

I I<br />

10 20<br />

PERCENT OVERBED AIR<br />

Figure 21 Measured Outlet Gas Concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong><br />

Various Percent Overbed Air R<strong>at</strong>es<br />

242


PARTICLE ENTRAINMENT AND NITRIC OXIDE REDUCTION<br />

IN THKFREEBOARD OF A FLUIDIZED COAL COMBUSTOR<br />

p. M. Walsh, T. Z. Chaung, A. Dutta, J. M. Begr, and A. F. Sar<strong>of</strong>im<br />

1.0 Introduction<br />

The Energy Labor<strong>at</strong>ory and Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering<br />

Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139<br />

Economic design <strong>of</strong> fluidized bed combustors requires a combin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> fluidizing<br />

velocities and particle sizes which result in <strong>the</strong> unavoidable carry over <strong>of</strong> bed<br />

solids, <strong>coal</strong> char particles and unburned gaseous combustion products into <strong>the</strong> freeboard.<br />

Depending upon <strong>the</strong> design parameter% <strong>the</strong> last 5 to 10% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustibles<br />

will burn, and also significant reduction <strong>of</strong> SO2 and NOx will take place, in <strong>the</strong><br />

freeboard <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized combustor - between <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed and <strong>the</strong> first row<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> convective tube bank.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> freeboard to <strong>the</strong> effi-<br />

cient and clean oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> fluidized combustors,until recently little <strong>at</strong>tention<br />

was paid to <strong>the</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> freeboard reactions. Pereira et a1 (1) and<br />

Gibbs et a1 (2) have determined chemical species concentr<strong>at</strong>ion vari<strong>at</strong>ion along <strong>the</strong><br />

height <strong>of</strong> a 30 x 30 cm cross section fluidized bed and found th<strong>at</strong> significant reduc-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> NO, takes place above <strong>the</strong> bed surface. Okada et a1 (3) have shown th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

fine sorbent particles entrained into <strong>the</strong> freeboard will enhance sulfur capture and<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> entrained char particles will react with NO, and reduce its emission.<br />

In earlier designs <strong>of</strong> fluidized combustors <strong>the</strong> problem posed by unacceptably<br />

high carbon carry over <strong>at</strong> fluidizing velocities was resolved by <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> fines precipit<strong>at</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> flue gas into a "carbon burn-up cell," an uncooled<br />

fluidized bed oper<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>at</strong> lower fluidizing velocity. In recent designs, instead <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> carbon burn-up cell <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> fines reinjection into <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed is<br />

adopted. In order to achieve oper<strong>at</strong>ional simplicity <strong>the</strong> fines 'in most practical<br />

applic<strong>at</strong>ions are added to fresh feed and returned into <strong>the</strong> bed. Fines reinjection<br />

significantly increases <strong>the</strong> fine particle concentr<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> bed and in <strong>the</strong> free-<br />

board with <strong>the</strong> consequence <strong>of</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r enhancing <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> heterogeneous reac-<br />

tions <strong>of</strong> char oxid<strong>at</strong>ion, and SO2 and NO reduction in <strong>the</strong> freeboard.<br />

Modeling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> freeboard reactions has been hindered by incomplete understand-<br />

ing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> processes which govern <strong>the</strong> entrainment <strong>of</strong> bed solid particles into <strong>the</strong><br />

freeboard and <strong>the</strong> mixing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se solids with <strong>the</strong> reactant gas. Entrainment models<br />

by George and Grace (4), Wen and Chen (5) and Horio et a1 (6) have fulfilled an<br />

important role in predicting solids concentr<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> freeboard,but due to a<br />

dearth <strong>of</strong> experimental inform<strong>at</strong>ion on entrainment r<strong>at</strong>e as a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidiza-<br />

tion parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed, <strong>the</strong>se models could not be rigorously tested and developed<br />

to <strong>the</strong> stage where <strong>the</strong>y can be incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed into FBC combustion models with suffi-<br />

cient confidence.<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO-carbon reaction for <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> NO in fluidized<br />

combustion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> was recognized and experimentally demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed by Pereira and<br />

Be& (7), Gibbs et a1 (2) and Furusawa et a1 (8). Kinetic parameters for this reaction<br />

were reported by Be& et a1 (9), Kunii et a1 (10) and Chan (11). Chan also<br />

found th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO-char reaction can be significantly enhanced in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> CO.<br />

The problems <strong>of</strong> predicting NO, reduction in <strong>the</strong> freeboard with sufficient accu-<br />

racy are not only due to uncertainties about solids entrainment but also about <strong>the</strong><br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ive significance th<strong>at</strong> CO, <strong>coal</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>iles, vol<strong>at</strong>ile nitrogen compounds,or hydro-<br />

carbons may have on NO reduction (Sar<strong>of</strong>im and Begr (12), Yamazaki et a1 (13)). In<br />

recent experimental studies <strong>at</strong> MIT detailed hydrocarbon species concentr<strong>at</strong>ion mea-<br />

surements by Walsh et a1 (14) have shown th<strong>at</strong> CO and hydrocarbon concentr<strong>at</strong>ions are<br />

high in <strong>the</strong> "splash zone" immedi<strong>at</strong>ely above <strong>the</strong> bed so th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir effect on NO reduc-<br />

243


tion in this region may not be neglected.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> following, model calcul<strong>at</strong>ions are presented <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> NO along<br />

<strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> freeboard <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MIT 0.6 x 0.6m cross section, 4.5m high fluidized<br />

bed. In <strong>the</strong> model a new approach is made to <strong>the</strong> prediction <strong>of</strong> solids concentr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

in <strong>the</strong> freeboard (Chaung (15))which is assisted by measurement d<strong>at</strong>a on <strong>the</strong> descend-<br />

ing flux <strong>of</strong> particles. The NO reduction along <strong>the</strong> height above <strong>the</strong> bed is <strong>the</strong>n pre-<br />

dicted from experimental inform<strong>at</strong>ion on <strong>the</strong> carbon content <strong>of</strong> bed solids and <strong>the</strong><br />

chemical kinetic r<strong>at</strong>e equ<strong>at</strong>ion on <strong>the</strong> NO-carbon reaction. The NO reductions so cal-<br />

cul<strong>at</strong>ed are <strong>the</strong>n compared with measurement d<strong>at</strong>a obtained burning bituminous and sub-<br />

bituminous <strong>coal</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> 0.6 x 0.6m MIT experimental facility.<br />

2.0 Particle Entrainment in <strong>the</strong> Freeboard<br />

2.1 Theory <strong>of</strong> Particle Entrainment<br />

A model has been developed for <strong>the</strong> entrainment <strong>of</strong> particles from <strong>the</strong> bed into<br />

<strong>the</strong> freeboard <strong>of</strong> a fluidized combustor. Its purpose is to provide an estim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> total surface area <strong>of</strong> each solid species particip<strong>at</strong>ing in chemical reactions in<br />

this zone. The model is based on <strong>the</strong> following assumptions:<br />

1. Bursting bubbles eject particles into <strong>the</strong> freeboard.<br />

2. Particle-particle interactions and wall effects are negligible.<br />

3. The changes in mass and size <strong>of</strong> a particle due to chemical reaction while<br />

in <strong>the</strong> freeboard are negligible.<br />

4. Interaction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion, temper<strong>at</strong>ure, and velocity gradients<br />

surrounding each particle are negligible.<br />

5. The initial velocities <strong>of</strong> particles ejected from <strong>the</strong> bed are given by a<br />

semi-empirical log-normal distribution having a geometric mean value proprotional<br />

to bubble velocity.<br />

6. Bubble diameters are determined by <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong> exchanger tube spacing and <strong>the</strong><br />

bubble growth model <strong>of</strong> Mori and Wen (16).<br />

The sequence <strong>of</strong> steps in <strong>the</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> particle density (mass <strong>of</strong> par-<br />

ticles/volume <strong>of</strong> gas-particle mixture) is as follows:<br />

1. The initial velocities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particles leaving <strong>the</strong> bed are given by <strong>the</strong><br />

assumed semi-empirical velocity distribution.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

The initial flux <strong>of</strong> particles is proportional to <strong>the</strong> flux <strong>of</strong> bubbles <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed. The proportionality factor is determined by equ<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong><br />

kinetic energies <strong>of</strong> a bursting bubble and <strong>the</strong> particles which it ejects.<br />

The equ<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> motion is solved for each particle size and initial velo-<br />

city to determine <strong>the</strong> particle trajectories.<br />

4. The particle density is determined from <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>ios <strong>of</strong> flux to velocity <strong>at</strong><br />

each freeboard height. Total density is found by summing <strong>the</strong> contributions<br />

from all sizes and initial velocities.<br />

Because solution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> equ<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> motion is time-consuming, for <strong>the</strong> required<br />

range <strong>of</strong> particle sizes and initial velocities, a simplified version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model<br />

was also developed, based on two additional assumptions:<br />

7. Small particles, having ut < ug, ascend with constant velocity, vs = ug -<br />

8.<br />

Ut'<br />

The drag force is negligible on particles having u<br />

t L ug.<br />

284


i<br />

1'<br />

1<br />

!<br />

I.<br />

i<br />

Chaung (15) showed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> devi<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particle fluxes predicted by <strong>the</strong> two<br />

models was less than <strong>the</strong> uncertainty in <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more accur<strong>at</strong>e version.<br />

Detailed description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> essential fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model.<br />

Initial velocity distribution.<br />

A log-normal fit was made to <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> ejected particle velocities<br />

given by George and Grace (4). which were normalized to <strong>the</strong> absolute bubble velo-<br />

cities, Ub. The geometric mean particle velocity and standard devi<strong>at</strong>ion were 2.44<br />

Ub and 1.43, respectively.<br />

Initial Entrainment<br />

George and Grace (4), defined a parameter, 5, equal to <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

volumes <strong>of</strong> entrained particles and bursting bubble. Using this parameter, <strong>the</strong> en-<br />

trainment from <strong>the</strong> bed surface, Eo, can be expressed by<br />

Glicksman et al. (17) give an expression for <strong>the</strong> visible bubble flow r<strong>at</strong>e, Qb. valid<br />

over <strong>the</strong> entire range <strong>of</strong> bubble volume fraction, 6:<br />

The total energy <strong>of</strong> a bubble before bursting can be equ<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> entrained particles and <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bubble through-flow gas. The total<br />

energy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bubble is given by <strong>the</strong> following equ<strong>at</strong>ion from Davidson and<br />

Harrison (18) :<br />

1 2<br />

(KE)b = -<br />

2 %,eff "b<br />

where <strong>the</strong> effective mass <strong>of</strong> a bubble, %,eff, is<br />

1<br />

%,eff = 7 (mass <strong>of</strong> fluid displaced by <strong>the</strong> bubble)<br />

Defining <strong>the</strong> root-mean-square velocity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entrained particles as v <strong>the</strong> total<br />

kinetic energy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particles ejected by <strong>the</strong> bubble is:<br />

P'<br />

where<br />

The kinetic energy <strong>of</strong> bubble through-flow gas is approxim<strong>at</strong>ely<br />

which is usually negligible compared with<br />

(KE)b S (KE)p, <strong>the</strong>n yields:<br />

2<br />

U.<br />

5 =- b<br />

2<br />

or (KE)<br />

P'<br />

The energy balance, i.e.,<br />

2 7<br />

P<br />

245<br />

2)<br />

3)


The absolute bubble velocity is given by<br />

The bubble diameter, db,.<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed was found by assuming an initial di-<br />

ameter equal to <strong>the</strong> spacing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong> exchanger tubes, and growth according <strong>the</strong><br />

correl<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Mori and Wen (16). This result; with <strong>the</strong> assumed velocity distri-<br />

bution; Equ<strong>at</strong>ions 2, 8, and 9; and <strong>the</strong> appropri<strong>at</strong>e experimental d<strong>at</strong>a; provide <strong>the</strong><br />

inform<strong>at</strong>ion required to calcul<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> initial entrainment by Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 1. No assump-<br />

tion has been made regarding <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particles, i.e., whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y orig-<br />

in<strong>at</strong>e in <strong>the</strong> wake or <strong>the</strong> cap <strong>of</strong> a bubble.<br />

Calcul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Particle Density<br />

The equ<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> motion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particles is<br />

Subject to <strong>the</strong> initial conditions<br />

v = v <strong>at</strong>Z=O 11)<br />

s si<br />

The toral particle density pr<strong>of</strong>ile along <strong>the</strong> freeboard is obtained by summing<br />

up all <strong>the</strong> contributions from ascending and descending particles.<br />

(all particle sizes)<br />

(all initial velocities)<br />

The calcul<strong>at</strong>ion must be repe<strong>at</strong>ed 6000 times if <strong>the</strong> particle size range is div-<br />

ided into 60 intervals and <strong>the</strong> initial velocity distribution into 100 intervals.<br />

The Simplified Model<br />

In order to save computer time <strong>the</strong> model was simplified by neglecting <strong>the</strong><br />

transient term for small particles and <strong>the</strong> drag force term for large particles.<br />

equ<strong>at</strong>ions to be solved are <strong>the</strong>n:<br />

for small particles (u<br />

for large particles (u > u ),<br />

t- g<br />

which gives for ascending particles<br />

v S =<br />

J.’ si - 2gz (PS - Pg)<br />

246<br />

< ug), vs = ug - u t<br />

PS<br />

The


The maximum height th<strong>at</strong> a large particle can reach is<br />

z<br />

's vsi<br />

Hmax = 2(Ps - Pg)g<br />

for descending particles<br />

v S =- J-) =<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> local velocity <strong>of</strong> each particle is obtained in analytic form, <strong>the</strong> particle<br />

density (Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 12) yields a closed-form expression:<br />

(Large particles<br />

P(Z) = 2(1-Yc)Eo fidvsi not elutriacted)<br />

J<br />

I<br />

(1-y )E f.dv (Large particles<br />

c 0 1 si<br />

elutri<strong>at</strong>ed)<br />

2<br />

vsi -2€!Z(Ps-Pg)/Ps<br />

(Small particles<br />

18)<br />

elutri<strong>at</strong>ed)<br />

I > y(d )<br />

YC<br />

where u (d ) < u is <strong>the</strong> mass fraction <strong>of</strong> small particles, and fi d vsi<br />

t Pi g<br />

represents <strong>the</strong> mass fraction <strong>of</strong> particles with an initial velocity between v andv .<br />

s1<br />

+ dv .. The validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ions made in simplifying <strong>the</strong> nodel wasSi<br />

s1<br />

by comparing <strong>the</strong> particle censities predicted by <strong>the</strong> two methods (15). The<br />

maximum discrepancy was less than 30% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particle density predicted by <strong>the</strong> complete<br />

model, and <strong>the</strong> significant fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> both density pr<strong>of</strong>iles were identical.<br />

The results presented here were obtained using <strong>the</strong> simpler model.<br />

Two Component Bed<br />

When <strong>the</strong> bed :,as two components, for example a very small amount <strong>of</strong> char mixed<br />

with stone, <strong>the</strong> initial entrainment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> char, Eo , is a small fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

total initial entrainment. Assuming th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> str<strong>at</strong>ific<strong>at</strong>ion factor is equal to <strong>the</strong><br />

density r<strong>at</strong>io.<br />

The initial velocity distribution for <strong>the</strong> char is <strong>the</strong> same as €or <strong>the</strong> stone, and <strong>the</strong><br />

total char density is found by <strong>the</strong> same procedure as before, with p in place<br />

s ,c<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ps.<br />

247


2.2 Measurement <strong>of</strong> Particle Flux<br />

All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiments described in <strong>the</strong> present paper were performed using <strong>the</strong><br />

M.I.T. Fluidized Combustion Research Facility, shown in Figure 1. The combustor<br />

has a square cross-section, 0.6m x 0.6m; and <strong>the</strong> total height, from distributor to<br />

exit, <strong>of</strong> 4.5m. The system has been described in detail elsewhere, (Be& et al.<br />

(19))<br />

The mass fluxes <strong>of</strong> particles extrained in <strong>the</strong> freeboard <strong>at</strong> various superficial<br />

gas velocities were measured in cold flow experiments by collecting descending par-<br />

ticles <strong>at</strong> various heights above <strong>the</strong> surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed. The particle<br />

collecting probe was formed by cutting a 22mm diameter tube in half lengthwise, SO<br />

th<strong>at</strong> it collects particles falling through a narrow strip on one axis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> com-<br />

bustor cross-section. The bed was a single b<strong>at</strong>ch <strong>of</strong> Ottawa Silica Sand (grade t20).<br />

Fine particles were removed from <strong>the</strong> bed by running for several hours prior to<br />

making <strong>the</strong> flux measurements. During <strong>the</strong> experiments <strong>at</strong>trition <strong>of</strong> bed particles and<br />

elutri<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> fines were negligible. The bed particle size distribution had a geo-<br />

metric mean diameter <strong>of</strong> 720 2 50um, determined by sieve analysis. The bed was flu-<br />

idized by ambient air supplied by forced-draft blowers. Bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure (average)<br />

and pressure (<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> distributor) were 330 2 20 K and lllk 2 kPa, respectively.<br />

Superficial velocity, calcul<strong>at</strong>ed for <strong>the</strong> empty tude <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure and pressure,<br />

was varied from 0.42 to 0.86 m/s. The superficial velocity and void fraction<br />

<strong>at</strong> minimum fluidiz<strong>at</strong>ion were 0.37 5 0.02 m/s and 0.50 2 0.01, respectively.<br />

For measurement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particle fluxes, <strong>the</strong> probes were first oriented upside-<br />

down until steady bed conditions were achieved <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> desired superficial velocity;<br />

<strong>the</strong> probe was <strong>the</strong>n rot<strong>at</strong>ed to face upward and collect <strong>the</strong> descending particles.<br />

After sufficient time had elapsed to approxim<strong>at</strong>ely half-fill <strong>the</strong> probe, <strong>the</strong> blowers<br />

were stopped, and <strong>the</strong> particles removed and weighed. Sampling times varied from 1<br />

minute to 10 hours, depending on height and superficial velocity. The method relies<br />

upon <strong>the</strong> assumption th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> p<strong>at</strong>hs <strong>of</strong> particles in <strong>the</strong> vicinity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> probe, moving<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r upward or downward, are not significantly affected by <strong>the</strong> motion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas<br />

around <strong>the</strong> probe.<br />

2.3 Comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Measured and Predicted Particle Flow R<strong>at</strong>es<br />

The complete set <strong>of</strong> experimental particle flow d<strong>at</strong>a were reported by Mayo (20).<br />

An exponential decay <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particle flow r<strong>at</strong>e with height was observed, having a<br />

characteristic length which increased with increasing gas velocity.<br />

Some represent<strong>at</strong>ive d<strong>at</strong>a points are shown in Figure 2, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> cor-<br />

responding flow r<strong>at</strong>es calcul<strong>at</strong>ed using <strong>the</strong> entrainment model. The predicted pro-<br />

files show a small region <strong>of</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely constant particles flow r<strong>at</strong>e just above<br />

<strong>the</strong> bed, followed by an approxim<strong>at</strong>ely exponential decay higher in <strong>the</strong> freeboard.<br />

The model thus displays a property analogous to <strong>the</strong> "splash zone" observed <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

top <strong>of</strong> bubbling fluidized beds. Agreement between <strong>the</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ed and experimental<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles is best for <strong>the</strong> intermedi<strong>at</strong>e gas velocities, with <strong>the</strong> predicted flow r<strong>at</strong>es<br />

generally larger than <strong>the</strong> observed values.<br />

The fluxes <strong>of</strong> ascending and descending particles, and <strong>the</strong> particle density for<br />

<strong>the</strong> case with gas velocity equal to 0.53 m/s, are shown in Figure 3. The model predicts<br />

a maximum in <strong>the</strong> density near <strong>the</strong> bed surface, where most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large particles<br />

change direction and return to <strong>the</strong> Le2. Ascending particle flux and density<br />

become constant <strong>at</strong> a height <strong>of</strong> about 2 m, where only small particles, moving <strong>at</strong> constant<br />

velocity equal to u - ut, continue upward. This point is <strong>the</strong> so-called<br />

"transport disengaging heFght".<br />

248


3.0 Nitric Oxide Reduction in <strong>the</strong> Freeboard<br />

3.1 The Mechanism <strong>of</strong> Nitric Oxide Reduction<br />

The model for NO reduction in <strong>the</strong> freeboard has been under development for some<br />

time. An earlier version, having a less complete description <strong>of</strong> particle entrain-<br />

ment, was employed by Beer et a1 (21) for <strong>the</strong> prediction <strong>of</strong> NO pr<strong>of</strong>iles. Destruc-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> NO in <strong>the</strong> freeboard is assumed to occur by heterogeneous reactions with <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>coal</strong> char entrained from <strong>the</strong> bed:<br />

NO + C = CO + 112 N2<br />

2 NO + C = C02 + N2<br />

Plug flow is assumed for <strong>the</strong> gas phase, and <strong>the</strong> char particle density is calcul<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

using <strong>the</strong> model for particle entrainment described in Section 2, above. The r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

change <strong>of</strong> NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion with height is given by:<br />

where A is <strong>the</strong> specific surface area <strong>of</strong> char available for reaction, and p is <strong>the</strong><br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ed char particle density. R<strong>at</strong>e coefficients in <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure rang8 <strong>of</strong><br />

interest have been reported by Chan (11).<br />

and by Song (22):<br />

k = 5.95 T exp(- Ea/RoT) m/s<br />

Ea = 81.6 x lo6 J/lur,ol<br />

T 5 1016 K<br />

3<br />

k = 4.1 x 10 T exp(- Ea/RoT) m/s<br />

Ea =<br />

T > 1016 K.<br />

136.8 x lo6 J/kmol<br />

The surface area assumed for <strong>the</strong> subbituminous <strong>coal</strong> char was based on <strong>the</strong> C02-<br />

BET surface areas reported for lignite and brown <strong>coal</strong> chars by Guerin et al. (23),<br />

Smith and Tyler (24), and Ashu et a1 ( 29. These workers reported specific surface<br />

areas ranfin! from 5 to 7 x lo5 m2/kg for particle sizes from 89 to 2000 pm. A value<br />

<strong>of</strong> 6 x 10 m /kgwas used in <strong>the</strong> present calcul<strong>at</strong>ions. The surface area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

bituminous char was taken near <strong>the</strong> lower limit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> range reported by Smith (26):<br />

1.5 x 105 m2/kg. The char is tre<strong>at</strong>ed as if all <strong>of</strong> its internal surface area were<br />

exposed to NO <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion and temper<strong>at</strong>ure found <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> exterior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particles<br />

(effectiveness factor <strong>of</strong> unity).<br />

Nitric oxide pr<strong>of</strong>iles are found by integr<strong>at</strong>ing Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 20, starting with <strong>the</strong><br />

experimentally measured concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong>, or near, <strong>the</strong> surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed.<br />

3.2 Measurement <strong>of</strong> Gas Composition and Char Properties<br />

Gas samples were withdrawn from <strong>the</strong> combustor through stainless steel probes.<br />

With <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> continuous sampling probe 4.lm above <strong>the</strong> distributor, all<br />

: <strong>the</strong> probes were w<strong>at</strong>er cooled. Probes loc<strong>at</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> bed were equipped with sintered<br />

quartz filters having pore sizes varying from 90 to 150 um and sample openings<br />

14.3 mm in diameter. Those loc<strong>at</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> freeboard had quartz ~roolfilters. The<br />

249<br />

20)


accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reported axial positions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> probes is subject to an uncertainty<br />

<strong>of</strong> f 40 mm; <strong>the</strong> probe tip Ioc<strong>at</strong>iQns rel<strong>at</strong>iye to <strong>the</strong> centerline <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustor<br />

ied from 50 to 170 mm. The gas sample continuously withdrawn <strong>at</strong> z = 4.lm passed<br />

through a KF 310 He<strong>at</strong>ed Bypass Filter (Permapure Products, Oceanport, N.J.) to a<br />

he<strong>at</strong>ed line, and was dried by perme<strong>at</strong>ion distill<strong>at</strong>ion. This sample was analyzed<br />

using Beckman Model 865 non-dispersive IR analyzers for CO and CO2, a <strong>the</strong>rmoelectron<br />

Model 10 Chemiluminescent NOx analyzer, and a Beckman Model 755 Paramagnetic oxygen<br />

analyzer. The total sample flow r<strong>at</strong>e was about loF4 m3/s (NTP). The gas sample<br />

from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r probes were dried by perme<strong>at</strong>ion distill<strong>at</strong>ion, collected in 250 cm 3<br />

bulbs for analysis on a HI? 5830 A gas chrom<strong>at</strong>ograph. Hydrocarbons C1 through C3 were<br />

detected using flame ioniz<strong>at</strong>ion, and CO, Cog, N2, and 02 by <strong>the</strong>rmal conductivity. A<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmoelectron Model 10 NOx analyzer, was also used to measure <strong>the</strong> NO mole fraction<br />

in this sample. The flow r<strong>at</strong>e was 2 to 20 x m3/s (NTP).<br />

A gas sample withdrawn from <strong>the</strong> bed and mixed in a bulb is, in a simplified<br />

picture, a mixture <strong>of</strong> gases withdrawn from <strong>the</strong> emulsion and bubble phases. At<br />

typical oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions <strong>the</strong> composition is heavily biased toward <strong>the</strong> emulsion<br />

(Walsh et a1 (27)). In order to distinguish <strong>the</strong> NO contents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> emulsion and<br />

bubble phases, <strong>the</strong> length and diameter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample line to <strong>the</strong> NO analyzer were<br />

minimized so th<strong>at</strong> a time-dependent NO mole fraction was observed. The measured NO<br />

mole fractions are shown in Figures 4-9, with bars indic<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> maximum and minimum<br />

values recorded. An analysis by Pereira et a1 (28) concluded th<strong>at</strong>, in <strong>the</strong> presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> excess air, NO is gre<strong>at</strong>er in <strong>the</strong> emulsion than in bubbles; and th<strong>at</strong> under stoichi-<br />

ometric or sub-stoichiometric conditions <strong>the</strong> NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ions in <strong>the</strong> two phases are<br />

identical. To determine <strong>the</strong> mixed-mean NO mole fraction <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed, <strong>the</strong><br />

average <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ive maxima observed in <strong>the</strong> time-dependent NO signal was assigned<br />

to <strong>the</strong> emulsion, and <strong>the</strong> average <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ive minima was assigned to <strong>the</strong> bubbles.<br />

The two averages were <strong>the</strong>n weighted according to <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ive flow r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> bubble<br />

and emulsion gas:<br />

This weighted value is shown as a d<strong>at</strong>a point <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed in Figures 6-8;<br />

it is <strong>the</strong> initial value used when Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 20 is iiitegr<strong>at</strong>ed starting <strong>at</strong> Z=O.<br />

Bed solid samples were withdrawn using a probe loc<strong>at</strong>ed 0.66m above <strong>the</strong> distributor.<br />

The probe was stainless steel, w<strong>at</strong>er cooled, and had a N2 quench stream cocurrent<br />

with <strong>the</strong> sample. The outer and inner diameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> probe were 44mm and<br />

19m, respectively. The extracted particles were separ<strong>at</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> gas stream in a<br />

w<strong>at</strong>er cooled cyclone and collected in a cooled vessel. The inert bed m<strong>at</strong>erial was<br />

Ottawa silica sand.<br />

The <strong>coal</strong> char was separ<strong>at</strong>ed from ash and sand particles col-<br />

lected in Runs C25-28 in order to determine <strong>the</strong> char particle size distribution.<br />

This was done by froth flot<strong>at</strong>ion. A represent<strong>at</strong>ive sample <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed solids was<br />

introduced into a flot<strong>at</strong>ion cell which contained a stirred kerosene-w<strong>at</strong>er emulsion<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r with 4-methyl-2-pentanol. The stirrer keeps <strong>the</strong> solids in suspension,<br />

breaks <strong>the</strong> kerosene into fine droplets, and disperses it uniformly. Nitrogen was<br />

introduced through a sintered stainless steel filter <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> a cell, forming<br />

bubbles which adhere to <strong>the</strong> char particles and lift <strong>the</strong>m up forming a froth,<br />

while <strong>the</strong> sand and ash particles were selectively depressed. The froth was collapsed<br />

in a filtering funnel and <strong>the</strong> char particles collected on <strong>the</strong> filter. The char was<br />

air dried for 24 hours and its size distribution determined using a Joyce Leobl<br />

"Magiscan" Image Analyzer. The size <strong>of</strong> each particle was defined as <strong>the</strong> diameter <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> sphere with volume equal to <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spheroid gener<strong>at</strong>ed by rot<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

about <strong>the</strong> major axis, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ellipse defined by <strong>the</strong> length and breadth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particle.<br />

An apparent char density, ps c, was determined from <strong>the</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ed volume <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> particles and <strong>the</strong> total mass <strong>of</strong> rhar; <strong>the</strong> results are given in Table 2.<br />

The char<br />

size distribution for Run C22 was found by sieving <strong>the</strong> bed sample and measuring <strong>the</strong><br />

weight loss on ignition <strong>of</strong> each size fraction; in Run A14 <strong>the</strong> distribution was<br />

250


assumed to be identical to th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> feed <strong>coal</strong>. The solid densities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> char<br />

in Runs A14 and C22 were estim<strong>at</strong>ed from published d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

Two <strong>coal</strong>s were used in <strong>the</strong> present experiments: bituminous <strong>coal</strong> from <strong>the</strong> Ark-<br />

Wright mine in <strong>the</strong> Pittsburgh seam and subbituminous <strong>coal</strong> from <strong>the</strong> Colstrip mine in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Rosebud seam in Rosebud County, Montana. The composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>coal</strong>s is<br />

given in Table 1.<br />

The size distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fuel and bed particles were determined by sieve<br />

analysis. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> size d<strong>at</strong>a for fuel, bed, and char particles were fit by log-<br />

normal distribution functions. The geometric means (mass basis) and standard devia-<br />

tion are listed in Table 2. The sizes were converted to a specific surface area<br />

basis for <strong>the</strong> comput<strong>at</strong>ions. The fluidized combustor oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions and rel-<br />

evant experimental d<strong>at</strong>a are also listed in Table 2. The d<strong>at</strong>a from Runs A14 and C22<br />

were first reported by Beer et a1 (19).<br />

3.3 Comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Measured and Predicted Nitric Oxide Pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

The NO pr<strong>of</strong>iles predicted by <strong>the</strong> model are shown in Figures 4-9, toge<strong>the</strong>r with<br />

<strong>the</strong> experimental d<strong>at</strong>a. When <strong>the</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ion is started <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed surface (solid<br />

line in Figures 4 and 5, dotted line in Figures 6-8) <strong>the</strong> agreement with experiment<br />

is good for Runs A14, C22, and C25; but very poor for Runs C26 and C28, in which<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is a very rapid decrease in NO just above <strong>the</strong> bed, and a discrepancy <strong>of</strong> about<br />

200 mole ppm between <strong>the</strong> predicted and observed NO mole fractions. There are not<br />

enough d<strong>at</strong>a to support a correl<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> this behavior with oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions,<br />

however, it can be seen from <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a in Table 2 th<strong>at</strong> C26 and C28 have <strong>the</strong> lowest<br />

bed temper<strong>at</strong>ures and lowest gas velocities. When calcul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO concentra-<br />

tion for <strong>the</strong>se two runs is started <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> next higher d<strong>at</strong>a point, excellent agree-<br />

ment with experiment is obtained from th<strong>at</strong> point upward (solid lines).<br />

In Run C27 <strong>the</strong> combustor was oper<strong>at</strong>ed using two-stage addition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion<br />

air, with <strong>the</strong> secondary air injector loc<strong>at</strong>ed 1.7m from <strong>the</strong> distributor. The air/fuel<br />

r<strong>at</strong>io in <strong>the</strong> bed was sub-stoichiometric, giving very low NO near <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed.<br />

The increase in NO mole fraction on addition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> secondary air indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong><br />

some fuel nitrogen species, not detected in <strong>the</strong> NO mode <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NOx analyzer, are<br />

present in <strong>the</strong> gas leaving <strong>the</strong> bed. When <strong>the</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO pr<strong>of</strong>ile is begun<br />

after mixing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> secondary air, <strong>the</strong> mechanism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> char entrainment/NO-char<br />

reduction model is still consistent with <strong>the</strong> experimental d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

The predictions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combined model for char entrainment and NO reduction are<br />

in good agreement with <strong>the</strong> observed NO pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>at</strong> distances above 0.5m from <strong>the</strong> bed,<br />

in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> staged air addition; <strong>the</strong> model is not able to account for <strong>the</strong> rapid<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> NO observed in <strong>the</strong> splash zone under some conditions. There are several<br />

phenomena, not incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> model, which might account for a steep gradient in<br />

NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> splash zone. First, <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> NO may only be an apparent<br />

one due to uncertainty in <strong>the</strong> determin<strong>at</strong>ion and weighting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bubble and<br />

emulsion gas compositions. The estim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mixed mean gas composition in <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

(Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 21) depends on <strong>the</strong> model used to estim<strong>at</strong>e partitioning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas between<br />

bubble and emulsion. O<strong>the</strong>r factors may contribute to <strong>the</strong> uncertainty in bed gas<br />

composition, for example, vari<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> sample flow r<strong>at</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

solids <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> probe tip; and mixing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample in <strong>the</strong> probe, sample line, and reaction<br />

chamber <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO analyzer. A second set <strong>of</strong> phenomena which might account for<br />

rapid reduction <strong>of</strong> NO in <strong>the</strong> splash zone is <strong>the</strong> altern<strong>at</strong>e reaction p<strong>at</strong>hways for destruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> NO, including reduction by CO, hydrocarbons, and NH3. Chan (11) has<br />

shown th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO-char reaction is enhanced in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> CO, <strong>the</strong> effect increasing<br />

with decreasing temper<strong>at</strong>ure. Reaction <strong>of</strong> NO and CO, c<strong>at</strong>alyzed by <strong>coal</strong> ash,<br />

is also possible. Mori and Ohtake (29) measured an NO decomposition r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 273 mole<br />

ppm/s.m2 on alumina, in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> 1000 mole ppm CO <strong>at</strong> 1041 K.<br />

The r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> re-<br />

action was approxim<strong>at</strong>ely first order in CO and zeroth order in NO, for NO above 300<br />

mole ppm.<br />

251


Nitric oxide reduction by methane, with reduction <strong>of</strong> up to 700 mole ppm NO in<br />

0.5 s, was observed in NO-CH4-02-CO2-Ar mixtures <strong>at</strong> 1323 K by Yamazaki et a1 (13).<br />

The temper<strong>at</strong>ure dependence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e is not reported so <strong>the</strong> possible contribu-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> this process <strong>at</strong> 1040-1100 K cannot be determined. Although <strong>the</strong> reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> NO was only significant for O2/CH4 mole r<strong>at</strong>ios <strong>of</strong> about 0.5 to 2.0, such condi-<br />

tions might exist locally during mixing <strong>of</strong> gases in <strong>the</strong> splash zone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluid-<br />

ized bed.<br />

Reactions <strong>of</strong> NO with NH3 such as:<br />

NO -I NH3 = H20 -I N2 -I 1/2H2<br />

(Duxbury and Pr<strong>at</strong>t (30)) are ano<strong>the</strong>r possible contribution to <strong>the</strong> rapid NO disappearance<br />

<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed. Nei<strong>the</strong>r ammonia nor NOx was measured in <strong>the</strong> present<br />

experiments, so <strong>the</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> this reaction cannot be precisely estim<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> increase in NO observed in run C27 on addition <strong>of</strong> secondary air is<br />

evidence th<strong>at</strong> N-containing species o<strong>the</strong>r than NO may be present in <strong>the</strong> freeboard <strong>at</strong><br />

least under sub-stoichiometric conditions. De Soete (31) determined an overall<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e expression for <strong>the</strong> homogeneous reaction between NO and NH3 giving N2 from measurements<br />

in e<strong>the</strong>ne/oxygen flames over <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure range 1800 to 2400 K. The<br />

reaction is first order with respect to both NO and NH3. The applicable temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

range is far from fluidized combustor conditions, however, <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e expression predicts<br />

an initial NO destruction r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 140 mole ppm/s <strong>at</strong> 1040 K in a mixture con-<br />

taining 600 mole ppm each <strong>of</strong> NO and NH3.<br />

It is possible th<strong>at</strong> this reaction contrib-<br />

utes to NO reduction in <strong>the</strong> splash zone. If it does contribute, <strong>the</strong> optimum (from<br />

<strong>the</strong> point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> NO emissions) primary stoichiometric r<strong>at</strong>io in a configur<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

with staged air addition, may be one <strong>at</strong> which some NO is left unreduced <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed, providing a reactant for direct conversion <strong>of</strong> NH3 to N2 in <strong>the</strong> splash<br />

zone.<br />

4.0 Conclusions<br />

A mechanistic model for particle entrainment into <strong>the</strong> freeboard has been de-<br />

veloped and used in conjunction with a chemical kinetic description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO-char<br />

reaction for prediction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> NO along <strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> freeboard in<br />

fluidized <strong>coal</strong> combustion. Bed conditions, including <strong>the</strong> mass fraction <strong>of</strong> char in<br />

<strong>the</strong> bed, are input to <strong>the</strong> model. Predicted NO pr<strong>of</strong>iles showed good agreement with<br />

experimental d<strong>at</strong>a obtained while burning bituminous and subbituminous <strong>coal</strong>s under a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions. The steep reduction in NO observed in <strong>the</strong> splash<br />

zone immedi<strong>at</strong>ely above <strong>the</strong> bed in some cases could not be adequ<strong>at</strong>ely explained by<br />

<strong>the</strong> present model. This result points to <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactions in <strong>the</strong><br />

splash zone, where it is thought th<strong>at</strong> NO reducing reactions o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> NO-char<br />

reaction will have to be taken into account for s<strong>at</strong>isfactory prediction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

NO pr<strong>of</strong>ile under all conditions. The model is now in a form in which it can be<br />

integr<strong>at</strong>ed into system models for predicting NO emissions as a function <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

conditions.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> models for particle entrainment and nitric oxide reduction<br />

was supported by DOE under Contract No.EX-76-A-01-2295. The experimental work<br />

was supported by DOE under Grant No. DE-FG22-8OPC30215, Dr. H. A. Webb, Project<br />

Manager.<br />

252


Nomencl<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

A<br />

*t<br />

cD<br />

‘NO<br />

$3<br />

_ _ _<br />

% y dc’ df<br />

Ea<br />

Ed’ E~<br />

Eo, E<br />

0,c<br />

Hf<br />

k<br />

Lf<br />

m P<br />

‘b<br />

RO<br />

%<br />

T<br />

TB<br />

T g<br />

‘b<br />

ug<br />

Umf<br />

Ut<br />

Vd’ vu<br />

vs* vsi<br />

-<br />

V P<br />

2<br />

Specific BET surface area <strong>of</strong> char (m /kg)<br />

2<br />

Cross sectional area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed. (m )<br />

Drag coefficient<br />

3<br />

NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion (kmole/m )<br />

Bubble diameter (m)<br />

Geometric mean diameters <strong>of</strong> bed particles, char particles, and fresh<br />

<strong>coal</strong> particles, respectively (m)<br />

Activ<strong>at</strong>ion energy (J/kmol)<br />

Mass flow r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> downward and upward moving particles, respectively<br />

(kg/s)<br />

Initial entrainment r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> stone and char particles from <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

surface, respectively (kg/s)<br />

Total freeboard height (m)<br />

R<strong>at</strong>e coefficient (units variable)<br />

Expanded bed height (m)<br />

Mass <strong>of</strong> a single particle (kg)<br />

3<br />

Visible bubble volume flow r<strong>at</strong>e (m /s)<br />

Gas constant = 8314 J/kmol * K<br />

Bubble radius (m)<br />

Temper<strong>at</strong>ure (K)<br />

Bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure (K)<br />

Gas temper<strong>at</strong>ure (K)<br />

Absolute bubble velocity (m/s)<br />

Superficial gas velocity (m/s)<br />

Minimum fluidiz<strong>at</strong>ion velocity (m/s)<br />

Particle terminal velocity (m/s)<br />

Downward and upward particle velocities, respectively (m/s)<br />

Particle local velocity and particle initial velocity, respectively<br />

(m/s)<br />

Root-mean-square particle initial velocity (m/s)<br />

253


xk<br />

yC<br />

z<br />

Z<br />

5<br />

Mole fraction <strong>of</strong> species k<br />

Mass fraction <strong>of</strong> char in <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

Distance above <strong>the</strong> distributor (m)<br />

Distance above <strong>the</strong> bed surface (m)<br />

Volume fraction <strong>of</strong> particles ejected per bursting bubble<br />

Bed voidage <strong>at</strong> minimum fluidiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Local density <strong>of</strong> stone and char particles, respectively, <strong>at</strong> free-<br />

board height Z, (kg/m3)<br />

3<br />

Gas density (kg/m )<br />

Solid densities <strong>of</strong> Stone and char, respectively (kg/m<br />

3<br />

)<br />

Bubble volume fraction<br />

Geometric standard devi<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> fresh <strong>coal</strong> particles, bed particles<br />

and char particles, respectively<br />

TABLE 1. ANALYSIS OF COALS<br />

Analysis Bituminous, Arkwright, Subbituminous, Colstrip Mine,<br />

(wt %) Pittsburgh Seam Rosebud Seam, Rosebud County, MT<br />

Proxim<strong>at</strong>e (as received)<br />

moi stu re 1 .6<br />

ash 8.01<br />

vol<strong>at</strong>ile m<strong>at</strong>ter 33.93<br />

fixed carbon 56.46<br />

U 1 ti m<strong>at</strong> e<br />

C<br />

H<br />

N<br />

S<br />

0<br />

ash<br />

(daf)<br />

76.36<br />

5.23<br />

1.47<br />

2.61<br />

5.26<br />

254<br />

(as received)<br />

19.19<br />

8.29<br />

2a .74<br />

43.78<br />

(dry)<br />

67.80<br />

4.45<br />

1 .oo<br />

.59<br />

15.91<br />

10.25


TABLE 2. OPERATING CONDITIONS AND EXPERIMENTAL DATA<br />

(pressure = 101 kPa)<br />

**<br />

Run Number A14 c2 2 C25 C2 6 C2 7 C2 8<br />

Coal Type Bitum- Sub bit u- Su bbi tu- Subbitu- Subbi tu- Subbi tu-<br />

minous minous minous minous minous minous<br />

a, (urn) 674 1000 1750 1750 2100 2100<br />

af 1.87 1.8 1 .83 1.83 2.12 2.12<br />

Stoichiometric 1 .lg 1.22 1.21 1 .E5 1.02 1.07<br />

air/fuel r<strong>at</strong>io<br />

1105 1134 1110 1050 1095 1040<br />

- - 1002 9 32 1043 988<br />

0.98 1.46 1 .oo 0 .80 0.94 0.86<br />

6 8 4.1 - 1.7 2.3<br />

Xo (2~4.1 m)<br />

2<br />

(mole %)<br />

3.2 4 .O 3.5 1.5<br />

2 0.9 1.5 0.25 2.1<br />

X ( ~ ~ 4 . m) 1<br />

co


Table 2 Cont'd<br />

Run Number A14 c22 C25 C2 6 C27* C28<br />

Coal Type Bitum- Su bbi tu- Subbitu- Subbitu- Subbitu- Subbi tu-<br />

minous minous minous minous minous minous I<br />

1<br />

ac (M) 674* 1123 2300 2300 2300 240 0<br />

0 1.87 1.41 1.55 1.54 1.52<br />

Apparent char 1400 1200 915 909 9 30 920<br />

solid den ity 3<br />

P (kg/m )<br />

s,c<br />

Estim<strong>at</strong>ed bubble 0.2 0.2 0.125 0.128 0.226 0.196<br />

fraction. 6<br />

Carbon mass 0.01 0.0012 0.00 15 0.0011 0.0056 0.0023<br />

fraction in<br />

<strong>the</strong> bed, Yc<br />

=<br />

XNn <strong>at</strong> bed<br />

surface<br />

(mole ppm)<br />

38 0 50 0 7 17 56 1 - 2 595<br />

BET specific 1.5~10~ 6x105 6x lo5 6x105 6x105<br />

su face <strong>of</strong> char<br />

5<br />

(m /kg)<br />

1.55 J<br />

6x105<br />

*The char size distribution in <strong>the</strong> bed for Run No. A14 is assumed to be <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong><br />

feed size distribution.<br />

**Run No. C27 used staged addition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion air.<br />

256<br />

I<br />

1


i<br />

1<br />

\<br />

', References<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

( 3.<br />

1<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

9.<br />

10.<br />

11.<br />

' 12.<br />

13.<br />

14.<br />

15.<br />

16.<br />

17.<br />

F. J. Pereira, J. M. Bee


18.<br />

19.<br />

20.<br />

21.<br />

22.<br />

23.<br />

24.<br />

25.<br />

26.<br />

27.<br />

28.<br />

29.<br />

30.<br />

31.<br />

3. F. Davidson and D. Harrison, Fluidised Particles, Cambridge University<br />

Press, 1963.<br />

J. M. Bee/r, A. F. Sar<strong>of</strong>im, S. S. Sandhu, M. Andrei, D. Bachovchin, L. K. Chan,<br />

T. Z. Chaung, and A. M. Sprouse, "NO, Emission from Fluidized Coal Combustion,"<br />

Final Report prepared for USEPA under Grant No. R804978020, 1981.<br />

J. E. Mayo, "Determin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Solids Loading in <strong>the</strong> Freeboard Section <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Fluidized Bed Coal Combustor," B.S. Thesis, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering,<br />

MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1980.<br />

J. M. Bee>, A. F. Sar<strong>of</strong>im, P. K. Sharma, T. Z. Chaung, and S. S. Sandhu, in<br />

Fluidiz<strong>at</strong>ion, Grace and M<strong>at</strong>sen, eds., Plenum, N.Y., 1980, p185.<br />

Y. H. Song, F<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Fuel Nitrogen During Pulverized Coal Combustion, Disserta-<br />

tion, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1978.<br />

H. Guerin, T. Siemieniewska, Y. Grillet, and M. FranSois, Carbon 8 (1970)727.<br />

I. W. Smith and R. J. Tyler, Combustion Science and Technology 9 (1974)87.<br />

J. T. Ashu, N. Y. Nsakala, 0. P. Mahajan, P. L. Walker, Fuel= (1978)250.<br />

I. W. Smith, Fuel 57 (1978)409.<br />

P. M. Walsh, A. K. Gupta, J. M. Bedr, and K. S. Chiu, "Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> DOE/<br />

WU Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion System Design and Oper<strong>at</strong>ion,"<br />

Morgantown, WV, October 27-29, 1980, p455.<br />

F. J. Pereira, J. M. Begr, and B. M. Gibbs, "Nitric Oxide Emissions from Fluid-<br />

ized Coal Combustion," presented <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> Central St<strong>at</strong>es Section, The Combustion<br />

Institute, Spring Meeting, April 5-6, 1976.<br />

Y. Mori and K. Ohtake, Combustion Science and Technology 2 (1977)ll.<br />

J. Duxbury and N. H. Pr<strong>at</strong>t, Fifteenth Symposium (Int'l) on Combustion, The<br />

Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1975, p843.<br />

G. G. De Soete, Fifteenth Symposium (Int'l) on Combustion, The CombusZion<br />

Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1975, p1093.<br />

258


\<br />

”<br />

Y) I<br />

259


HEIGHT ABOVE BED (ml<br />

0: DESCENDING<br />

PARTICLE DATI<br />

HEIGHT ABOVE BED (ml<br />

FIGURE 2. DESCENDING PARTICLE FLOW RATE VS. FIGURE 3. PARTICLE DENSITY, ASCENDING FLUX,<br />

HEIGHT ABOVE THE BED. COMPARISON<br />

OF MODEL PREDICTIONS WITH<br />

EXPERIMENT.<br />

AND DESCENDING FLUX VS. HEIGHT<br />

ABOVE THE BED.<br />

-<br />

A<br />

, I , I , I , I ,<br />

1100 - I<br />

looo<br />

I<br />

- - I Run No. A14<br />

700 -<br />

.- - I<br />

U<br />

500 -<br />

200 -<br />

- 900<br />

E 500<br />

$ 400<br />

Run No C22<br />

SUBBITUMINOUS COAL<br />

uq = 1.46 rn/s<br />

Ta = 1134 K<br />

Xo2(z = 2.25 ml = 5.1 mole<br />

3, = 1120prn<br />

Y, = 0.12 wt %<br />

I<br />

2 3<br />

-<br />

200<br />

- 100<br />

4 i<br />

2 3 4<br />

Helght Above Distributor (rn) Helght Above Distributor (m)<br />

FIGURE 4. MOLE FRACTION NITRIC OXIDE FIGURE 5. MOLE FRACTION NITRIC OXIDE<br />

VS. AXIAL POSITION VS. AXIAL POSITION<br />

I MEASURED I MEASURED<br />

-CALCULATED -CALCULATED<br />

260


t<br />

I<br />

100 - -<br />

I<br />

I ] , I , I , I<br />

'ii 900<br />

a<br />

5 800<br />

0<br />

Z 700<br />

600<br />

500 -_<br />

d 400 -<br />

I<br />

300 - -<br />

200 -<br />

100 -<br />

0- 0<br />

Run No. C28<br />

SUBBITUMINOUS COAL<br />

u, = 0.86 m/s<br />

Ti = 1040 K<br />

XO (z 4.1 ml = 1.5mole%<br />

- 2<br />

dc = 2400pm<br />

Y, = 0.23 wt %<br />

I 2 3 4<br />

Height Above Distributor (rn)<br />

FIGURE 8. MOLE FRACTION NITRIC OXIDE<br />

VS. AXIAL POSITION<br />

I MEASURED<br />

K CALCULATED<br />

, , I I I I I 1 1<br />

-<br />

1100- I<br />

I Run No, C26<br />

1000 - I SUBBITUMINOUS COAL -<br />

- 900- I ug = 0.80 m/s -<br />

E I Tg = 1050K<br />

2 BOO-<br />

I<br />

100 - I<br />

I<br />

FIGURE 7. MOLE FRACTION NITRIC OXIDE<br />

VS. AXIAL POSITION<br />

I MEASURED<br />

=CALCULATED<br />

I<br />

1<br />

I<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Ln<br />

1100- I I<br />

I Run No. C27<br />

1000 -- I SUBBITUMINOUS COAL<br />

I ug = 0.94 m/s - 900 -<br />

I Tg = 1095 K<br />

E<br />

I<br />

5 800 - Xo2 (2 = 4.1 m) = 3.5 mole<br />

I 8, = 2300pm<br />

0<br />

z 700- I Yc 0.56 Wt %<br />

c I I<br />

.O 600- I<br />

c<br />

U<br />

I<br />

? 500- I<br />

LL<br />

I<br />

400- I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

300- - I<br />

I<br />

200 -<br />

261<br />

Height Above Distributor (m)<br />

FIGURE 9. MOLE FRACTION NITRIC OXIDE<br />

VS. AXIAL POSITION<br />

I MEASURED<br />

-CALCULATED


"NOF" Form<strong>at</strong>ion and Kinetics <strong>of</strong> "NOx" Reduction in<br />

Fluidized Bed Combustion <strong>of</strong> Carbonaceous M<strong>at</strong>erials<br />

Takehiko Furusawa, Mikio Tsunoda,<br />

Seiichi Sudo, Shunichi Ishikawa and Daizo Kunii<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Tokyo<br />

Bunkyo-Ku Tokyo 113 JAPAN<br />

In contrast with <strong>the</strong> extensive investig<strong>at</strong>ions concerning sulfer<br />

retention in <strong>the</strong> United St<strong>at</strong>es, <strong>the</strong> initial stage <strong>of</strong> development in<br />

Japan has focused on <strong>the</strong> nitric oxide emission control.<br />

The staged air firing is considered to be <strong>the</strong> most promising<br />

method for control. In this oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed is maintained<br />

under a deficiency <strong>of</strong> air and <strong>the</strong> design factors influencing sulfur<br />

retention, form<strong>at</strong>ion and destruction <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide, ammonia and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

nitrogeneous compounds, and combustion efficiency are complex interactions.<br />

The optimum design <strong>of</strong> a fluidized bed combustor requires<br />

sound qualit<strong>at</strong>ive inform<strong>at</strong>ion concerning <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide<br />

form<strong>at</strong>ion and quantit<strong>at</strong>ive descriptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kinetics <strong>of</strong> "NO" destruction.<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this report is to describe <strong>the</strong> recent findings<br />

concerning "NOx" form<strong>at</strong>ion and <strong>the</strong> kinetics <strong>of</strong> "NOx" reduction reactions<br />

in fluidized bed combustion <strong>of</strong> carbonaceous m<strong>at</strong>erials.<br />

I. NITRIC OXIDE EMISSION FROM FLUIDIZED BED COMBUSTION<br />

Equipment, Procedure and M<strong>at</strong>erials<br />

The combustors are stainless steel vessels, 50mm diam. 580mm long<br />

and 76mm diam. 850 mm long. The lower part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vessel was packed<br />

with refactory m<strong>at</strong>erials and used for prehe<strong>at</strong>ing. Fluidizing air or<br />

simul<strong>at</strong>ed air consisting <strong>of</strong> oxygen and argon enters <strong>the</strong> combustor<br />

through a multi-orifice pl<strong>at</strong>e distributor into a bed <strong>of</strong> microspherical<br />

particles whose chemidal and physical <strong>properties</strong> are given in Table 1.<br />

The multi-orifice pl<strong>at</strong>e was designed so th<strong>at</strong> a pressure drop sufficient<br />

to achieve homogeneous fluidiz<strong>at</strong>ion could be obtained. In a series <strong>of</strong><br />

experiments carried out to investig<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> air staging, <strong>the</strong><br />

primary stage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed was maintained <strong>at</strong> substoichiometric conditions,<br />

while <strong>the</strong> balance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> air was introduced through <strong>the</strong> nozzles into<br />

<strong>the</strong> freeboard.<br />

The st<strong>at</strong>ic bed height was specified to be 10cm. The fluidized bed<br />

combustor was externally he<strong>at</strong>ed by an electric furnace. The temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> bed was controlled by a conventional PID electronic controller.<br />

262


Feeding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carbonaceous m<strong>at</strong>erials employed was done by means<br />

Of a solid feeder developed in our labor<strong>at</strong>ory. Thus continuous feed <strong>of</strong><br />

a small flow r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> solids (such as 0.2 g/min) could be realized. The<br />

solids were sent into <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed combustor <strong>at</strong> a point 30-35mm<br />

above <strong>the</strong> distributor.<br />

Ash was removed by elutri<strong>at</strong>ion and <strong>the</strong> elutri<strong>at</strong>ed solids were<br />

removed from <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-gas by a small cyclone separ<strong>at</strong>or. In a certain<br />

series <strong>of</strong> experiments, collected solids were used for chemical analysis<br />

to obtain <strong>the</strong> combustion efficiency.<br />

Upstream from <strong>the</strong> cyclone separ<strong>at</strong>or, (5cm below <strong>the</strong> top cover <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> combustor) <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-gas was continuously diverted to a gas-analysis<br />

system. A chemiluminescent NOx analyzer provided continuous measurement<br />

for NOx while gas chrom<strong>at</strong>ography provided intermittent analysis for H2<br />

Nz, CO, CO2, CH4 and CzHk. Known gas mixtures were used to calibr<strong>at</strong>e<br />

<strong>the</strong> gas chrom<strong>at</strong>ograph. Kitagawa NH3 low-range ditector tubes were used<br />

to analyze NH3. <strong>the</strong> experimantal conditions employed are shown in<br />

Table 1, while <strong>the</strong> carbonaceous m<strong>at</strong>erials employed for <strong>the</strong> present<br />

series <strong>of</strong> experiments are shown in Table 2.<br />

Table 1 Scope <strong>of</strong> experiment<br />

Inert particles: Microspherical particles<br />

Si02:8.93%, A1203:90.61%, FezO3: 0.46%<br />

Surface mean particle diameter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inert particles:<br />

580 microns for <strong>coal</strong> and char, 613 microns and 322 microns for coke<br />

Bulk density: 0.57 g/cm3<br />

Temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> fluidized bed: 700-10OO0C<br />

St<strong>at</strong>ic height <strong>of</strong> bed: lOcm<br />

Diameter <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and char particels: 500-710 microns<br />

Mean diameter <strong>of</strong> coke particles,<br />

Coke I : 109 microns<br />

Coke I1 : 191 microns<br />

Coke 111: 460 microns<br />

(A) ID 50mm combustor (height 490mm)<br />

Flow r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> fluidizing air and<br />

simul<strong>at</strong>ed air: 4.2-8.1 €JR/rnin<br />

Feed r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> fuel particles: 0.5-1.7 g/min<br />

(B) ID 76mm combustor (height SSOMn)<br />

Flow r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> fluidizing air and<br />

simul<strong>at</strong>ed air: 3.9-10.4 Nk/min<br />

Feed r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> fuel particles: 0.37-1.27 g/min<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile components on nitric oxide emission4f6)<br />

Fundamental investig<strong>at</strong>ions concerning <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> stoichio-<br />

metric r<strong>at</strong>io and combustion temper<strong>at</strong>ure on "NO" emission were carried<br />

out by use Of various types <strong>of</strong> carbonaceous m<strong>at</strong>erials indic<strong>at</strong>ed in<br />

Table 2. Typical results are shown in Fig.1 (a) and (b) . Figure 1 (a)<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> a considerably high level <strong>of</strong> "NO" emission in <strong>the</strong> pre-<br />

sence <strong>of</strong> reducing gas (H2, CO and CH4) was observed under a<br />

substoichiometric combustion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> while quite a low level <strong>of</strong> "NO"<br />

emission was detected under a starving combustion <strong>of</strong> char.<br />

263


-<br />

d<br />

U<br />

I<br />

I<br />

c<br />

10<br />

co<br />

= Y<br />

> z<br />

," 20<br />

CHAR II<br />

CHAR il<br />

COKE I<br />

COKE II'<br />

1.1 #.I 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.1<br />

AIR RATIO A (-) AIR RATIO 1<br />

(a) (b)<br />

Fig. 1 Effects <strong>of</strong> stoichiometric r<strong>at</strong>io and combustion<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure on "NO" emission<br />

50t<br />

v)<br />

B<br />

CHAR<br />

COAL<br />

10 100<br />

VOLATILE MATER %I<br />

Fig. 2 Conversion <strong>of</strong> fuel nitrogen to NO with respect<br />

to vol<strong>at</strong>ile components<br />

264


!<br />

Table 2 Proxim<strong>at</strong>e and ultim<strong>at</strong>e analyses <strong>of</strong> carbonaceous m<strong>at</strong>erials used<br />

Char I *1<br />

Char 11 *2<br />

Char 111 *3<br />

Coal *4<br />

Coke I *5<br />

Coke I1 *5<br />

Coke 11' *5<br />

Coke I11 *5<br />

Carbon *6<br />

Char I *1<br />

Char I1 *2<br />

Char I11 *3<br />

Coal *4<br />

Coke I *5<br />

Coke I1 *5<br />

Coke 11' *5<br />

Coke I11 *5<br />

Carbon *6<br />

Proxim<strong>at</strong>e analysis [wt%l<br />

Vol<strong>at</strong>ile Fixed- Ash<br />

m<strong>at</strong>ter carbon<br />

3.83 54.09 19.8<br />

2.74 66.00 24.47<br />

10.89 65.04 19.84<br />

43.3 39.1 12.7<br />

1.4 96.0 1.4<br />

3.7 92.5 0.2<br />

5.3 90.9 0.4<br />

10.9 85.7 1.7<br />

5.2 94.7 0.1<br />

Ultim<strong>at</strong>e analysis [dry%]<br />

C H N S<br />

96.21<br />

71.66<br />

70.99<br />

66.9<br />

94.0<br />

89.2<br />

91.7<br />

87.1<br />

97.2<br />

0.59<br />

1.03<br />

2.77<br />

5.4<br />

1.3<br />

2.1<br />

2.6<br />

4.0<br />

1.4<br />

0.54<br />

0.61<br />

1.27<br />

1.4<br />

0.7<br />

1.5<br />

2.4<br />

2.5<br />

0.1<br />

0.27<br />

0.01<br />

0.02<br />

0.1<br />

2.7<br />

2.9<br />

2.1<br />

1.4<br />

0.1<br />

*1 Char I: produced from Liddell <strong>coal</strong>/Australia<br />

*2 Char 11: produced from Taiheiyo <strong>coal</strong>, pyrolysis<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure: 800°C<br />

*3 Char 111: produced from Taiheiyo <strong>coal</strong>, pyrolysis<br />

tempar<strong>at</strong>ure: 6OO0C<br />

*4 Coal: Taiheiyo <strong>coal</strong><br />

*5 Coke: origin<strong>at</strong>ed from petroleum residue<br />

*6 Carbon: activ<strong>at</strong>ed carbon from petroleum residue<br />

0<br />

3.91<br />

0.34<br />

4.21<br />

13.2<br />

-<br />

4.1<br />

0.7<br />

3.2<br />

1.1<br />

Moisture<br />

22.28<br />

6.69<br />

4.32<br />

4.9<br />

1.2<br />

3.6<br />

3.4<br />

1.7<br />

(3.2)<br />

Ash<br />

25.48<br />

26.35<br />

20.74<br />

13.0<br />

1.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.5<br />

1.8<br />

0.1<br />

"NO" emission from char or coke, both <strong>of</strong> which contained less vol<strong>at</strong>iles<br />

than <strong>coal</strong> is radically reduced as <strong>the</strong> stoichiometric r<strong>at</strong>io is<br />

reduced. This fact toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> reduced ammonia emission suggests<br />

th<strong>at</strong> staged air firing may provide advantageous combustion modific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

for <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> "NOx" emission. This is discussed in <strong>the</strong> forth<br />

coming sections.<br />

Figurel(b) demonstr<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong> conversion r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> fuel nitrogen to<br />

fuel NO <strong>of</strong> various carbonaceous m<strong>at</strong>erials.<br />

In this experiment <strong>the</strong><br />

effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal-NO was elim<strong>at</strong>ed by using AR/02 mixture instead <strong>of</strong> air.<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> NO emission under an excess air condition seemed to be<br />

considerably dependent on <strong>the</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile contents <strong>of</strong> fuel.<br />

The fraction <strong>of</strong> fuel bond nitrogen which formed fuel-NO <strong>at</strong> A = 1.3<br />

is illustr<strong>at</strong>ed in Fig.2 where vol<strong>at</strong>ile contents were calcul<strong>at</strong>ed on<br />

265


ash and moisture free basis. This indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> conversion r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

fuel bond nitrogen to nitric oxide was reduced with <strong>the</strong> increased vola-<br />

tile contents.<br />

Jonke et a1 . ')reported th<strong>at</strong> "NO" emission under a substoichiometric<br />

combustion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> was increased <strong>at</strong> decreased temper<strong>at</strong>ure. This<br />

behavior was observed in Fig.l(a). Thus "NO" emission level from high<br />

vol<strong>at</strong>ile <strong>coal</strong> <strong>at</strong> elev<strong>at</strong>ed temper<strong>at</strong>ures, approaches <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> "NO"<br />

emission from less vol<strong>at</strong>ile fuels <strong>at</strong> lower temper<strong>at</strong>ures. This fact<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> decreased ammonia form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> elev<strong>at</strong>ed temper<strong>at</strong>ures<br />

suggests also <strong>the</strong> efficient combustion modific<strong>at</strong>ion for <strong>the</strong> reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> "NO" emission.<br />

Form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> nitrogenous compounds and staged combustion4' 586)<br />

A series <strong>of</strong> experiments were carried out to investig<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> air staging. In this oper<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>the</strong> primary stage, which was a<br />

fluidized bed, was maintained <strong>at</strong> substoichiometric conditions while <strong>the</strong><br />

balance <strong>of</strong> air, (<strong>the</strong> secondary air) was introduced through a nozzle<br />

into <strong>the</strong> freeboard. A significant reduction <strong>of</strong> "NO" emission by staged<br />

air firing can only be realized provided <strong>the</strong> emission <strong>of</strong> "NO" as well<br />

as o<strong>the</strong>r nitrogeneous compounds from <strong>the</strong> primary stage are significantly<br />

reduced. Thus <strong>the</strong> ammonia emission from <strong>coal</strong> and char are measured by<br />

<strong>the</strong> detector tube method. Typical results are shown in Fig. 3. Ammonia<br />

emission was not detected under an excess air condition. Under a substoichiometric<br />

condition, this could be reduced by elev<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong><br />

combustion temper<strong>at</strong>ure, or reducing moisture, or vol<strong>at</strong>ile contents. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> char combustion, <strong>the</strong> ammonia emission under starving combustion<br />

<strong>at</strong> 85OOC was approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 1/7 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> "NO" emission under an<br />

excess air condition.<br />

These results suggest th<strong>at</strong> a significant reduction <strong>of</strong> "NO" emission<br />

can be achieved by a staged combustion <strong>of</strong> char.<br />

A preliminary experi-<br />

ment was carried out to evalu<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> possibilities <strong>of</strong> staged air firing.<br />

Experimental results indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> an approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 90% reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

"NO" emission was <strong>at</strong>tained in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> staged combustion <strong>of</strong> char<br />

where this was evalu<strong>at</strong>ed on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> an "NO" emission indexobtained<br />

for conventional oper<strong>at</strong>ions. However, <strong>the</strong> maximum level <strong>of</strong> "NO" reduc-<br />

tion in this oper<strong>at</strong>ion for <strong>coal</strong> remained <strong>at</strong> 33.5%.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> in situ formed carbon on "NO"<br />

Carbonaceous m<strong>at</strong>erials within <strong>the</strong> bed were reported to be effective<br />

in "NO" destruction. The steady st<strong>at</strong>e carbon concentr<strong>at</strong>ion within<br />

<strong>the</strong> bed was measured. After termin<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> feed <strong>of</strong> fuel solids, <strong>the</strong><br />

amount <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide and monoxide origin<strong>at</strong>ing from <strong>the</strong> remaining<br />

carbon particles was measured by means <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas bag method.<br />

results obtained are compared with <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> "NO" emission in Fig. 4.<br />

These results indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> "NO" emission was inversely rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong><br />

steady st<strong>at</strong>e carbon concentr<strong>at</strong>ion. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> steady st<strong>at</strong>e car-<br />

bon concentr<strong>at</strong>ion within <strong>the</strong> bed was found to be considerably small.<br />

266<br />

The<br />

' I<br />

. I


lb, ,<br />

--pp---p-- 4 p?<br />

CHAR 1<br />

Tu-IWO'C<br />

0' 06 OB 10 12<br />

AIR RATIO 9 1-1<br />

(a) (b)<br />

Fig. 3 Emission <strong>of</strong> ammonia from combustion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and char<br />

Fig. 4 NO emission decreased with <strong>the</strong> increase <strong>of</strong> steady<br />

st<strong>at</strong>e carbon concentr<strong>at</strong>ion within <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

267


Intrinsic R<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> Fuel Nitrogen Conversion to Nitric Oxide<br />

The significant magnitude <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide destruction by char or<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r reducing gas suggests th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide<br />

measured <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed or freeboard did not reflect <strong>the</strong> intrin-<br />

sic evolution level <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide from <strong>the</strong> combustion. Thus <strong>the</strong><br />

measured value depended on <strong>the</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ive importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> "NO"<br />

form<strong>at</strong>ion reaction and <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> "NO" reduction. The experimentally<br />

obtained concentr<strong>at</strong>ion pr<strong>of</strong>iles along <strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed and free-<br />

board may verify this mechanism. Inform<strong>at</strong>ion concerning <strong>the</strong> intrinsic<br />

evolution level <strong>of</strong> "NO" from char particles is required to describe <strong>the</strong><br />

above process quantit<strong>at</strong>ively. The response curve <strong>of</strong> "NO" formed within<br />

<strong>the</strong> combustor by <strong>the</strong> puls input char was measured so th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> subsequent "NO" reduction by char or o<strong>the</strong>r reducing gas could be<br />

minimized. This is shown schem<strong>at</strong>ically in Fig.5(a). The response peak<br />

<strong>of</strong> "NO" formed by <strong>the</strong> combustion with <strong>the</strong> reduced intensity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> input<br />

puls tends to a certain value from which <strong>the</strong> intrinsic r<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> fuel<br />

nitrogen conversion to nitric oxide could be evalu<strong>at</strong>ed. Typical results<br />

are illustr<strong>at</strong>ed in Fig. 5(b). This value seems to be a little smaller<br />

than <strong>the</strong> value obtained by continuous combustion in a small experimental<br />

facility. This fact suggests th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> emission level <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide is<br />

affected by <strong>the</strong> intensity <strong>of</strong> combustion, consequently <strong>the</strong> steady st<strong>at</strong>e<br />

carbon concentr<strong>at</strong>ion within <strong>the</strong> bed. However, <strong>the</strong>se results do not<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental results obtained by a small<br />

scale combustion facility concerning <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide<br />

emission.<br />

11. KINETICS OF "NO" DESTRUCTION<br />

R<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> "NO" reduction by char')<br />

An iso<strong>the</strong>rmal fixed bed tubular reactor <strong>of</strong> diluted char particles<br />

and activ<strong>at</strong>ed carbon (char 11, carbon in table 2) was used to measure<br />

<strong>the</strong> reaction r<strong>at</strong>e over a temper<strong>at</strong>ure range which is <strong>of</strong> practical importance<br />

in fluidized bed combustion. Since <strong>the</strong> "NO" concentr<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

employed in <strong>the</strong> experiment were <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> several hundred ppm, <strong>the</strong><br />

amount <strong>of</strong> carbon could be assumed to be constant.<br />

reported elsewhere.<br />

The details were<br />

The reduction <strong>of</strong> "NO" by char and activ<strong>at</strong>ed carbon was first order<br />

with respect to "NO" concentr<strong>at</strong>ion. Figure 6 represents <strong>the</strong> Arrhenius<br />

plot for char where alpha (a) denotes <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

oxygen to <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> "NO" <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> inlet. Thus <strong>the</strong> line coresponding<br />

to a=O indic<strong>at</strong>es this r<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

At lower temper<strong>at</strong>ure ranges <strong>the</strong> activ<strong>at</strong>ion energy for char was<br />

16.3 kcal/mol and coincided with <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a reported previously. Above<br />

680T <strong>the</strong> activ<strong>at</strong>ion energy was 58.6 kcal/mol. The reason for <strong>the</strong><br />

increase in <strong>the</strong> activ<strong>at</strong>ion energy has not been explained. In <strong>the</strong> lower<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>the</strong> desorption <strong>of</strong> carbon-oxygen surface complex was considered<br />

to control <strong>the</strong> overall r<strong>at</strong>e. The gaseous reaction product was<br />

Nz, CO and COz. As <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure was elev<strong>at</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> CO<br />

in <strong>the</strong> reaction product increased.<br />

268<br />

c


I<br />

CHAR<br />

Y<br />

Y<br />

/I<br />

TIME<br />

O i ' ' ' ' 1 ' ' ' ' ' 0<br />

' 2 '<br />

WEIGHT OF I MPULSE ( g )<br />

I1 I'..-<br />

8<br />

V<br />

TIME<br />

-100<br />

50 50<br />

0<br />

0<br />

LT<br />

1000 1000<br />

(b)<br />

h<br />

OO 1 2<br />

WEIGHT OF IMPULSE ( g )<br />

Fig. 5 Intrinsic conversion r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> fuel nitrogen to<br />

nitric oxide<br />

269


R<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> "NO'! reduction by char under an excess air condition<br />

Kinetic inform<strong>at</strong>ion concerning whe<strong>the</strong>r or not "NO" can be reduced<br />

by char in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> oxygen is required in order to analyze <strong>the</strong><br />

mechanism <strong>of</strong> "NO" destruction within <strong>the</strong> bed and freeboard. The use <strong>of</strong><br />

a fixed bed <strong>of</strong> diluted char particles was restricted to a range <strong>of</strong> lower<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ures and lower oxygen concentr<strong>at</strong>ions since <strong>the</strong> char was consumed<br />

by combustion reaction. The r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> char combustion is approxim<strong>at</strong>ely<br />

a hundred times faster than <strong>the</strong> "NO" reducton.<br />

The "NO" destruction accompanied by oxid<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> char was also<br />

assumed to be first order with respect to "NO" concentr<strong>at</strong>ions. This<br />

assumption was verified under low oxygen and "NO" concentr<strong>at</strong>ions. The<br />

results are shown in Fig. 6. The reaction was significantly accelar<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

by adding oxygen. An increased r<strong>at</strong>e was also observed for "NO" destruc-<br />

tion by activ<strong>at</strong>ed carbon.<br />

Over a range <strong>of</strong> higher temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> added oxygen<br />

on <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e could not be investig<strong>at</strong>ed since <strong>the</strong> carbon concentr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

-<br />

-<br />

I<br />

IO<br />

5<br />

10<br />

5<br />

El0<br />

I<br />

Y<br />

5<br />

Id<br />

5<br />

I<br />

TEMP. ( 'C )<br />

800 720 600 500 420 370<br />

I e IChar Oxid<strong>at</strong>ion I<br />

1.0 1.2 1.4<br />

VT x lo3 ( OK-~ 1<br />

I<br />

1.6<br />

Fig. 6 R<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> NO reduction by char and <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong><br />

oxygen on "NO" reduction<br />

270<br />

A<br />

,/


could not be assumed constant. Thus a fluidized bed reactor with a continuous<br />

feed and discharge <strong>of</strong> carbon (150mm height) was used to analyze<br />

<strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e for higher oxygen concentr<strong>at</strong>ion; namely, a large value <strong>of</strong> a<br />

and a higher temper<strong>at</strong>ure. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> “NO“ in a<br />

Simul<strong>at</strong>ed combustion product containing C02 was studied. A remarkable<br />

result from <strong>the</strong>se experiments is th<strong>at</strong> a significant reduction <strong>of</strong> “NO“<br />

was realized even under an excess air condition in which oxygen remained<br />

in <strong>the</strong> outlet flow.<br />

The simplified bubbling bed model by Kunii and Levenspiel was used<br />

to evalu<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> reaction r<strong>at</strong>e in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> oxygen. First, <strong>the</strong><br />

effective bubble diameter was calcul<strong>at</strong>ed as an adjustable parameter by<br />

curvefitting <strong>the</strong> experimental d<strong>at</strong>a obtained in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> oxygen to<br />

<strong>the</strong> curve calcul<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>oretically by <strong>the</strong> above model and <strong>the</strong> kinetic<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a shown previously. Then <strong>the</strong> increased r<strong>at</strong>e in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong><br />

oxygen was evalu<strong>at</strong>ed by changing <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e, but by keeping <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r parameter,<br />

including <strong>the</strong> effective bubble diameter, constant.<br />

In this evalu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> fuel “NO” formed by<br />

<strong>the</strong> simultaneously occuring combustion <strong>of</strong> char was compens<strong>at</strong>ed for. The<br />

details are shown elsewhere. The estim<strong>at</strong>ed r<strong>at</strong>e is shown in Fig. 5. An<br />

increased r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> “NO“ reduction was observed in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> oxygen<br />

<strong>at</strong> both 60OoC and 750°C. The r<strong>at</strong>e was not significantly reduced by <strong>the</strong><br />

presence <strong>of</strong> oxygen <strong>at</strong> 8OO0C. At 853’C <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> “NO“ destruction was<br />

reduced by coexisting oxygen. The extent <strong>of</strong> “NO“ reduction by both char<br />

and activ<strong>at</strong>ed carbon in both <strong>the</strong> absence and presence <strong>of</strong> oxygen was measured<br />

over a temper<strong>at</strong>ure ronge <strong>of</strong> 700Q990O0C where <strong>the</strong> heiyht <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

was 150mm. The results toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> oxygen consumption<br />

is shown in Fig. 7. The increased r<strong>at</strong>e for char was verified up to<br />

approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 75OoC and th<strong>at</strong> for <strong>the</strong> activ<strong>at</strong>ed carbon up to 95OoC.<br />

Reduction <strong>of</strong> “NO” in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide and hydrogen8’12)<br />

The preliminary investig<strong>at</strong>ion concerning <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> nitric<br />

oxide by char in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> hydrogen or carbon monoxide was carried<br />

out over a temper<strong>at</strong>ure range <strong>of</strong> 700-800°C in a fixed bed reactor mentioned<br />

previously. The reaction was first order with respect to nitric<br />

oxide. Ammonia was formed in <strong>the</strong> nitric oxide hydrogen-char system.<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> hydrogen and carbon monoxide decreased <strong>the</strong> consumption<br />

<strong>of</strong> carbon to nearly zero, as:<br />

NO + CO+COz + %N2<br />

NO .+ Hg+H20 + ‘/2 Nz<br />

NO tV2H2-+NHB + H2 0<br />

(1)<br />

(2)<br />

(3)<br />

The r<strong>at</strong>es and activ<strong>at</strong>ion energies obtained for <strong>the</strong> above c<strong>at</strong>alytic reac-<br />

tions for (1) or (2) + (3) agreed with <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> nonc<strong>at</strong>alytic reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> nitric oxide by char within <strong>the</strong> experimental error. This strongly<br />

suggested th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> activ<strong>at</strong>ed adsorption <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide on <strong>the</strong> char sur-<br />

face controlled <strong>the</strong> overall r<strong>at</strong>es. The r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> ammonia formed by<br />

reaction (3) to <strong>the</strong> consumed nitric oxide which is found to be constant<br />

<strong>at</strong> each temper<strong>at</strong>ure is decreased with an increased temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

271


1.01 I<br />

(a) Char<br />

N<br />

0<br />

x -<br />

0.5-<br />

a -<br />

X<br />

0-<br />

KEY1 11 I N0inbpn)lOZ in I %)<br />

A 1 01243-2531 0<br />

I 0 1 73 I 251 -2561 1.83- 1.86<br />

700 750 aoo 850 900<br />

Temp. I T )<br />

(b) Carbon<br />

Fig. 7 Increased extent <strong>of</strong> "NO" reduction caused by oxygen<br />

Concluding Remarks<br />

"NOx"<br />

This paper descirbed <strong>the</strong> recent findings concerning <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong><br />

form<strong>at</strong>ion in a fluidized bed combustor obtained by use <strong>of</strong> a variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> carbonaceous m<strong>at</strong>erials. The "NO" emission under an excess air condition<br />

was decreased with an increase in <strong>the</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile contents <strong>of</strong> fuels.<br />

The emission <strong>of</strong> "NO" and o<strong>the</strong>r nitrogeneous contents formed under a substoichiometric<br />

combustion was also strongly dependent on <strong>the</strong> vol<strong>at</strong>ile<br />

contents. The staged combustion <strong>of</strong> less vol<strong>at</strong>ile char and coke provided<br />

a radical reduction <strong>of</strong> "NO" emission. The steady st<strong>at</strong>e carbon<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ion was measured and "NO" emission was found to be inversely<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> carbon concentr<strong>at</strong>ion. The intrinsic conversion r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong><br />

fuel nitrogen to "NO" was measured. The kinetics <strong>of</strong> "NO" destruction by<br />

char in both <strong>the</strong> absence and presence <strong>of</strong> oxygen was investig<strong>at</strong>ed. The<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e for char was increased up to 75OOC. "NO" was reduced c<strong>at</strong>alytically<br />

by carbon monoxide and hydrogen over a char surface, but <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e was not<br />

increased.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

D. K. whishes to express his thanks to Grant-in-Aid for Energy Re-<br />

search (NO 311604, NO 411003 & NO 505021) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Educ<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

T.F. received Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (NO 455363 & NO 555374)<br />

from <strong>the</strong> same body. The experimental assistance by Mr. A. K<strong>at</strong>0 was<br />

272


\<br />

gre<strong>at</strong>ly acknowledged.<br />

Liter<strong>at</strong>ure Cited<br />

Be&, J.M., A.F. Sar<strong>of</strong>im, L. Chan L A. Sprouce: Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

5th Int. Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion, p577 -p592 (1977)<br />

Be&, J.M., A.F. Sar<strong>of</strong>im L Y.Y. Lee, Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 6th Int.<br />

Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion, p942 -p955 (1980)<br />

Jonke, A.A., G.J. Vogel, E.L. Carls et al.:<br />

Series 68, NO 126, 241 (1972)<br />

Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp.<br />

Furusawa, T., T. Honda, J. Takano and D.<br />

Japan 11, 377 (1978)<br />

Kunii: J. <strong>of</strong> Chem. Eng.<br />

Furusawa, T., N. Yamada, T. Sendo and D.<br />

Japan 12, 71 (1979)<br />

Kunii: J. <strong>of</strong> Chem. Eng.<br />

Furusawa, T., T. Honda, J. Takano and D. Kunii: Fluidiz<strong>at</strong>ion, Proceedings<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2nd Eng. Found. Conf., Cambridge University Press<br />

(1978)<br />

Furusawa, T., D. Kunii, N. Yamada and A. Oguma: Int. Chem. Eng. E,<br />

239 (1980) or Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu 4, 562 (1978)<br />

Furusawa, T., D. Kunii and T. Tsunoda: under prepar<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Gibbs, B.M., F.J. Pereira and J.M. Be&: 16th Symposium on Combustion,<br />

Cambridge, 461 (1976)<br />

10) Kunii, D., K.T. Wu and T. Furusawa: Chem. Eng. Sci. 35, 170 (1980)<br />

11) Kunii, D., T. Furusawa and K.T. Wu: ed. J.R. Grace a;;;i J.M. M<strong>at</strong>sen,<br />

Fluidiz<strong>at</strong>ion, Plenum Publishing Corp. New York, p175 -p183 (1980)<br />

12) Cowley, L.T. and P.T. Roberts: Paper submitted for present<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Fluidized Combustion Conference, 28-30th Jan. (1981) held <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Energy Research Institute, University <strong>of</strong> Cape Town, South<br />

Africa<br />

273


Abstract<br />

REDUCTION OF NITRIC OXIDE BY CARBONACEOUS SOLIDS<br />

IN AN ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE FLUIDIZED-BED REACTOR<br />

BY<br />

Z. Huang,' G. T. Chen,' and C. Y. Wen'<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering<br />

West Virginia University<br />

Morgantown, WV 26506<br />

J. Y. Shang,3 J. S . Mei,' and J. E. Notestein'<br />

Technology Development and Engineering Division<br />

U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy<br />

Morgantown Energy Techoology Center<br />

Morgantown, WV 26505<br />

The fluidized-bed combustion process, due to its ability to control pollutant<br />

emissions and its inherent capability to accommod<strong>at</strong>e a wide variety <strong>of</strong> fuels, has<br />

been <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> acceler<strong>at</strong>ing development for industrial and utility applica-<br />

tions. However, fluidized-bed combustion boilers based on <strong>the</strong> current design and<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ion may not be able to meet <strong>the</strong> future stringent standards on nitrogen oxides<br />

emissions without additional provisions. In this paper, a preliminary study on <strong>the</strong><br />

reduction reactions <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide with three different carbonaceous solids using a<br />

9.6-centimeter diameter, electrically he<strong>at</strong>ed, b<strong>at</strong>ch fluidized-bed reactor oper<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

<strong>at</strong> various design and oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions is discussed. Results <strong>of</strong> this investiga-<br />

tion indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> NO reduction reaction appears to be dependent upon not only<br />

<strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing variables such as bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure, carbonaceous solid loading in <strong>the</strong><br />

bed, but also on <strong>the</strong> physical <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carbonaceous solids as well. Pre-<br />

diction <strong>of</strong> NO reduction by one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carbonaceous solids using a two-phase bubble<br />

model shows good agreement with experimental d<strong>at</strong>a within <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> experimental<br />

conditions.<br />

Introduction<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> various techniques for direct conversion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chemical energy in<br />

<strong>coal</strong> to <strong>the</strong>rmal energy, <strong>the</strong> fluidized-bed combustion (FBC) process appears to be one<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most <strong>at</strong>tractive means due to its inherent fe<strong>at</strong>ures. The higher he<strong>at</strong> capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solid bed m<strong>at</strong>erial leads to good combustion stability which, consequently,<br />

permits use <strong>of</strong> essentially all fossil fuels including low-grade fuels high in ash<br />

and/or moisture content and low in he<strong>at</strong>ing value, such as <strong>coal</strong> refuses, pe<strong>at</strong>, oil<br />

shales, etc. The use <strong>of</strong> a sulfur-accepting sorbent affords in situ capture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

sulfur dioxide evolving from <strong>the</strong> burning <strong>of</strong> sulfur-bearing fuels. Bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

is maintained sufficiently low and, thus, results in rel<strong>at</strong>ively low emissions <strong>of</strong><br />

nitrogen oxides and less slagging and fouling problems than in conventional <strong>coal</strong>-<br />

fired boilers. Lastly, <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> vigorous particle mixing in <strong>the</strong> fluidized<br />

bed provides higher bed-to-surface he<strong>at</strong> transfer r<strong>at</strong>es which results in less he<strong>at</strong><br />

exchange surface rel<strong>at</strong>ive to conventional <strong>coal</strong>-fired boilers. As a consequence,<br />

fluidized-bed combustion boilers fueled by <strong>coal</strong>s and low-grade fuels have been <strong>the</strong><br />

subject <strong>of</strong> acceler<strong>at</strong>ing developments for industrial and utility applic<strong>at</strong>ions both in<br />

<strong>the</strong> U.S. and abroad. In recent years a number <strong>of</strong> fluidized-bed boilers have been<br />

'Visiting scholars from People's Republic <strong>of</strong> China.<br />

'Benedum Pr<strong>of</strong>ess or.<br />

3Division Deputy Director.<br />

4Mechanical Engineer.<br />

5Division Director.<br />

274


constructed and oper<strong>at</strong>ed to demonstr<strong>at</strong>e a variety <strong>of</strong> industrial and utility applic<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

and process reliability; for examplel’z’3 <strong>the</strong> commercial prototype fluidizedbed<br />

boiler <strong>at</strong> Georgetown University, <strong>the</strong> industrial applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a fluidized-bed<br />

boiler <strong>at</strong> Gre<strong>at</strong> Lakes Naval Training St<strong>at</strong>ion, and <strong>the</strong> prototype anthracite culm<br />

fluidized-bed combustion boiler <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> industrial park in Shamokin, PA. In addition,<br />

a 20 MWe fluidized-bed boiler pilot plant is currently under construction by TVA for<br />

<strong>the</strong> utility applic<strong>at</strong>ion3.<br />

At present, <strong>the</strong> EPA nitrogen oxides emission standard is 0.6 lb N02/million Btu<br />

input; most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluidized-bed combustion boilers, which are based on <strong>the</strong> current<br />

design and oper<strong>at</strong>ion principles, can meet <strong>the</strong> standard without additional efforts.<br />

However, it is anticip<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> nitrogen oxides emission standard may become more<br />

stringent in <strong>the</strong> future. The fluidized-bed boilers using <strong>the</strong> current design and<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ion principles may not be able to meet <strong>the</strong> stringent standards for NO emissions<br />

without additional provisions. It is, <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> th?s project<br />

to investig<strong>at</strong>e and determine <strong>the</strong> pertinent design and oper<strong>at</strong>ional variables<br />

which affect NO emissions from fluidized-bed combustion boilers. Results <strong>of</strong> this<br />

investig<strong>at</strong>ion mgy enable fur<strong>the</strong>r insight to be gained into <strong>the</strong> mechanism <strong>of</strong> NO<br />

destruction in <strong>the</strong> bed and provide design and oper<strong>at</strong>ional inform<strong>at</strong>ion for <strong>the</strong> future<br />

development <strong>of</strong> low-NO fluidized-bed combustion boilers to meet <strong>the</strong> anticip<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

stringent EPA nitroge; oxides emission standards.<br />

Experimental Facility<br />

Experiments on nitrogen oxides reduction were conducted using an electrically<br />

he<strong>at</strong>ed, labor<strong>at</strong>ory-scale, fluidized-bed reactor, which is shown schem<strong>at</strong>ically in<br />

Figure 1. This labor<strong>at</strong>ory-scale b<strong>at</strong>ch fluidized-bed reactor consists <strong>of</strong> a 9.6-cm<br />

diameter, 47 cm tall, stainless steel cylindrical vessel. The lower section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

vessel is surrounded by a 20-cm tall, 1.36 KW electric he<strong>at</strong>er, such th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed can<br />

be he<strong>at</strong>ed to about 1000°C. The stainless steel cylindrical vessel is also heavily<br />

insul<strong>at</strong>ed with Fiberfrax. The bed is supported on a 6.35 mm thick stainless steel<br />

perfor<strong>at</strong>ed gas distributor with fifty-six (56), 0.8-mm diameter orifices.<br />

Bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure was regul<strong>at</strong>ed and controlled by a transformer. Reaction Lem-<br />

per<strong>at</strong>ure was measured by a chromel-alumel <strong>the</strong>rmocouple with a Hastalloy she<strong>at</strong>h <strong>of</strong><br />

3.175 nun diameter. Readings were displayed in degrees on a digital <strong>the</strong>rmometer.<br />

The <strong>the</strong>rmocouple was suspended <strong>at</strong> a point which was 5 cm from <strong>the</strong> distributor; <strong>the</strong><br />

axial temper<strong>at</strong>ure distribution in <strong>the</strong> bed and freeboard was measured by moving <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>rmocouple.<br />

Temper<strong>at</strong>ure recordings in <strong>the</strong> bed above 2.5 cm from <strong>the</strong> distributor indic<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed temper<strong>at</strong>ures were essentially uniform. However, a temper<strong>at</strong>ure gradient<br />

<strong>of</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 18OC/cm was observed in <strong>the</strong> freeboard section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactor. The<br />

bed was fluidized by pure nitrogen gas; carbon monoxide, methane, and nitric oxide<br />

could also be introduced into <strong>the</strong> fluidizing gas stream in controlled amounts. All<br />

gas flow r<strong>at</strong>es were measured by rotameters. Exit gas composition was continuously<br />

monitored by preset gas analyzers as shown below:<br />

Compound Principle <strong>of</strong> Oper<strong>at</strong>ion Instrument’<br />

NO Chemiluminescence<br />

co IR<br />

co2 IR<br />

02 Paramagnetic<br />

Total HC Flame Ioniz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Thermo-Electron, Series 10<br />

MSA-LIRA, Model 303<br />

MSA-LIRA, Model 303<br />

Leeds and Northrup<br />

Beckman, Model 400<br />

‘The use <strong>of</strong> brand names is for <strong>the</strong> identific<strong>at</strong>ion purposes only and does not<br />

constitute endorsement by <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy.<br />

275


The analyzed flue gas concentr<strong>at</strong>ions were registered on a six-channel strip chart<br />

recorder.<br />

M<strong>at</strong>erials Used for <strong>the</strong> Experiments, Chars and Coke<br />

Nitric oxide reduction experiments were conducted using two different chars and<br />

a coke. Char 1 was produced from Wyoming sub-bituminous <strong>coal</strong> by Occidental Research<br />

Corpor<strong>at</strong>ion's (OCR) Flash Pyrolysis process, with BET (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller) surface<br />

area <strong>of</strong> 290 m2/g, a size cange <strong>of</strong> 30 x 70 mesh, and a density <strong>of</strong> 2.010 g/cm3.<br />

Its chemical composition is listed in Table 1. Char 2 was made in situ from Pittswick<br />

bituminous <strong>coal</strong> (8 x 12 mesh in size). The Pittswick <strong>coal</strong> was fed a little <strong>at</strong><br />

a time into <strong>the</strong> bed where sand was fluidized and he<strong>at</strong>ed to a temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> 850°C by<br />

<strong>the</strong> prehe<strong>at</strong>ed nitrogen gas to prevent <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> from clinkering. The <strong>coal</strong> was <strong>the</strong>n<br />

pyrolyzed in a nitrogen <strong>at</strong>mosphere for half an hour to produce Char 2. The chemical<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> Char 2 and its parent <strong>coal</strong> are also listed in Table 1. Char 2 had a<br />

BET surface area <strong>of</strong> 2.4683 m2/g and a density <strong>of</strong> 2.288 g/cm3. It is important to<br />

note th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> analytical d<strong>at</strong>a for Char 2 on a weight basis, such as its chemical<br />

composition and surface area, are not as precise as desired because <strong>the</strong> char samples<br />

contained a certain amount <strong>of</strong> sand which could not be completely separ<strong>at</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong><br />

char before analysis.<br />

Metallurgic coke, obtained from Mercury Coal and Coke, Inc., near Morgantown,<br />

was also used in <strong>the</strong>se tests. It was ground and screened to obtain coke particles<br />

<strong>of</strong> 12 to 20 mesh size. The coke particles were <strong>the</strong>n fluidized with nitrogen in <strong>the</strong><br />

hot fluidized bed <strong>at</strong> 900°C for one hour. After <strong>the</strong> m<strong>at</strong>erial was cooled, <strong>the</strong> test<br />

feedstock coke was obtained. The BET surface area <strong>of</strong> this coke was 0.8668 m2/g and<br />

its density was 2.067 g/cm3. Its chemical composition is listed in Table 1.<br />

Bed M<strong>at</strong>erial<br />

Glass sand with a mean particle diameter <strong>of</strong> 0.286 mm was used as <strong>the</strong> bed m<strong>at</strong>e-<br />

rial. The size distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sand is listed in Table 2. The BET surface area<br />

was 0.846 m2/g and its density was 2.664 g/cm3.<br />

The minimum fluidiz<strong>at</strong>ion velocity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sand was determined experimentally <strong>at</strong><br />

elev<strong>at</strong>ed temper<strong>at</strong>ure. A pressure drop versus gas velocity is plotted in Figure 2.<br />

As can be seen, <strong>the</strong> minimum fluidiz<strong>at</strong>ion velocity is approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 5.5 cm/sec <strong>at</strong> a<br />

bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> 822OC.<br />

Experimental Procedure<br />

The experimental procedures for NO reduction by Char 1 and by metallurgic coke<br />

were precisely <strong>the</strong> same. First, <strong>the</strong> reactor containing 1164 g <strong>of</strong> sand was he<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

while <strong>the</strong> sand was simultaneously fluidized with prehe<strong>at</strong>ed nitrogen. When <strong>the</strong><br />

desired reaction temper<strong>at</strong>ure was reached, <strong>the</strong> fluidizing gas was turned <strong>of</strong>f and a<br />

feed hopper with a long dipleg was inserted rapidly into <strong>the</strong> reactor through a stop-<br />

cock in <strong>the</strong> feedline on top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactor. A weighed amount <strong>of</strong> char (or coke) was<br />

<strong>the</strong>n poured into <strong>the</strong> hopper from which it dropped onto <strong>the</strong> hot sand. The hopper was<br />

<strong>the</strong>n removed, <strong>the</strong> cock closed, and <strong>the</strong> nitrogen switch was turned on immedi<strong>at</strong>ely<br />

such th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> char was distributed evenly throughout <strong>the</strong> bed. When <strong>the</strong> bed tempera-<br />

ture had restabilized <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> desired level, a measured flow <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide was<br />

admitted. The concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> each component in <strong>the</strong> exit gas were continuously<br />

monitored and recorded on a six-channel strip chart recorder.<br />

In order to reach <strong>the</strong> required steady-st<strong>at</strong>e conditions in a short dur<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

time, <strong>the</strong> experiments to determine NO reduction capability <strong>of</strong> Char 1 and coke were<br />

conducted in sequence from low temper<strong>at</strong>ure (6OOOC) to high temper<strong>at</strong>ure (85OOC) <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> same carbon loading.<br />

276


The experimental procedure for <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide by Char 2 was simi-<br />

lar to <strong>the</strong> procedure for Char 1 and metallurgic coke as described above, except th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> tests were carried out in a temper<strong>at</strong>ure sequence from 85OOC (highest) to lower<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ures, since Char 2 was produced "in situ'' under a nitrogen <strong>at</strong>mosphere <strong>at</strong><br />

850°C which was <strong>the</strong> highest chosen reaction temper<strong>at</strong>ure for an experiment.<br />

Experimental Results and Discussion<br />

Experiments on <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> NO by carbonaceous solids were carried out <strong>at</strong><br />

various oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions. Results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se experiments and <strong>the</strong>ir corresponding<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions are presented in Tables 3, 4, and 5 for Char 1, Char 2, and<br />

metallurgic coke respectively. A discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se d<strong>at</strong>a is presented below.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Char Surface Area and Porosity on Nitric Oxide Reduction<br />

Experimental results <strong>of</strong> NO reduction by a b<strong>at</strong>ch <strong>of</strong> carbonaceous solids in <strong>the</strong><br />

absence <strong>of</strong> oxygen were plotted in Figure 3 <strong>at</strong> identical oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions.<br />

Results shown in Figure 3 indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> heterogeneous reduction <strong>of</strong> NO by Char 1 and<br />

Char 2 are significantly higher than th<strong>at</strong> achieved with metallurgic coke. The<br />

reactivities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three carbonaceous solids are compared in Table 6 . Differences<br />

in <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> NO by <strong>the</strong>se carbonaceous solids may be <strong>at</strong>tributed to <strong>the</strong> dif-<br />

ferences in physical <strong>properties</strong>, such as specific surface area and porosity.<br />

Char 1, which gives <strong>the</strong> highest NO reduction, poses <strong>the</strong> highest specific surface<br />

area, although its carbon content is less than <strong>the</strong> metallurgic coke. Scanning<br />

Electron Microscope (SEMI porosity measurement also indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> Char 1 exhibits<br />

<strong>the</strong> highest porosity. As can be seen in Figure 4, micropores with size ranging from<br />

100 pm to 0.3 pm cover nearly 100 percent <strong>of</strong> its surface. Although <strong>the</strong> metallurgic<br />

coke has <strong>the</strong> highest carbon content among <strong>the</strong> three tested carbonaceous solids, its<br />

specific surface area is <strong>the</strong> smallest. The coke also has compar<strong>at</strong>ively smaller<br />

pores which range in size from 10 pm to 1.5 pm and cover only about 1 percent <strong>of</strong> its<br />

surface as can be seen in Figure 5. Figure 6 shows <strong>the</strong> porosity measurement <strong>of</strong><br />

Char 2, which has pore sizes ranging from 40 pm to 1 pm and covering 45 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

its surface. A comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a presented in Table 6 and <strong>the</strong> porosity measure-<br />

ments given by SEN indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> low NO conversion r<strong>at</strong>e achieved by metallurgic<br />

coke may be <strong>at</strong>tributed to its small BET surface area as well as its low porosity.<br />

Interpret<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se d<strong>at</strong>a suggests th<strong>at</strong> internal diffusion may also play an<br />

important role in determining <strong>the</strong> overall reaction r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> a large porous solid<br />

particle, which has rel<strong>at</strong>ively low porosity and small BET surface area, with a<br />

reactant gas.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Bed Temper<strong>at</strong>ure in Nitric Oxide Reduction by Chars<br />

The reduction reaction between NO and char was found to be strongly influenced<br />

by oper<strong>at</strong>ing bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure. Figures 7 and 8 show <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure on<br />

NO reduction by Char 1 and Char 2. As can be seen, nitric oxide concentr<strong>at</strong>ion in<br />

<strong>the</strong> exit gas decrease with increasing bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> both Char 1 and Char 2.<br />

Within <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions, NO reductions <strong>of</strong> 90 percent or better were<br />

<strong>at</strong>tainable provided th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure was maintained <strong>at</strong> or above 800OC. As<br />

<strong>the</strong> bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure was raised, fur<strong>the</strong>r, NO outlet concentr<strong>at</strong>ion decreased continu-<br />

ously, but <strong>at</strong> a decreasing r<strong>at</strong>e. However, <strong>the</strong>rmodynamic calcul<strong>at</strong>ions indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>at</strong> a temper<strong>at</strong>ure or 900°C, equilibrium concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal NO may reach<br />

500 ppm for a mixture <strong>of</strong> 2 percent oxygen and 75 percent nitrogen4. In view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

current practice in design and oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> fluidized-bed combustion boilers, <strong>the</strong><br />

use <strong>of</strong> excess oxygen <strong>at</strong> higher bed temper<strong>at</strong>ures may promote <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

NO. The higher bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure is also unfavorable to <strong>the</strong> sulf<strong>at</strong>ion reaction <strong>of</strong><br />

n<strong>at</strong>ural sorbents in <strong>the</strong> <strong>at</strong>mospheric pressure fluidized bed. Therefore, an optimum<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure range for NO and SO, emission control appears to be 800° to 850OC.<br />

277


Effect <strong>of</strong> Char Loading on Nitric Oxide Reduction<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> char loading in <strong>the</strong> fluidized bed on NO reduction by char is<br />

illustr<strong>at</strong>ed in Figure 9. As can be seen, <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> NO increases with increase<br />

in char loading. A t bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> 75OoC, <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> char loading is most<br />

important around 1 percent where it results in a NO reduction <strong>of</strong> 87 percent. A t<br />

higher char loading, <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> NO is generally higher; however, <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> ,<br />

<strong>the</strong> char loading becomes less significant. The same trend can also be observed <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ore range below 75OoC, even though <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> NO falls below<br />

60 percent due to <strong>the</strong> strong temper<strong>at</strong>ure dependence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reduction reaction.<br />

Higher char loading in <strong>the</strong> bed may increase <strong>the</strong> chances <strong>of</strong> clinker form<strong>at</strong>ion which<br />

is caused by local temper<strong>at</strong>ure excursion as a consequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poor solid mixing<br />

and <strong>the</strong> inability to dissip<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> he<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> combustion. In addition, <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong><br />

unburnt carbon in <strong>the</strong> drained spent-bed m<strong>at</strong>erial may become unacceptable if <strong>the</strong> char<br />

loading in <strong>the</strong> bed becomes too high. However, recent developments in fluidized-bed<br />

combustion technology have indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> two-stage combustion systems with <strong>the</strong><br />

increased char loading in <strong>the</strong> first stage enhances <strong>the</strong> overall reduction <strong>of</strong> nitric<br />

oxide emission significantly5.<br />

Prediction <strong>of</strong> NO Reduction by Char 1<br />

Recent experimental studies6 on <strong>the</strong> reduction reaction <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide with char<br />

have concluded th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction is f irst order with respect to <strong>the</strong> NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

This practice is, hence, adopted in <strong>the</strong> present study. The reaction r<strong>at</strong>e constants<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction <strong>of</strong> NO with Char 1 <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> corresponding temper<strong>at</strong>ures and char load-<br />

ings were calcul<strong>at</strong>ed based on <strong>the</strong> experimental d<strong>at</strong>a presented <strong>at</strong> Table 3. The<br />

activ<strong>at</strong>ion energy and <strong>the</strong> frequency factor within <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions<br />

are 31.7 kcal/mol and 9.66 x 10' sec-' respectively. The r<strong>at</strong>e constants <strong>of</strong> NO-char<br />

plotted as a function <strong>of</strong> inverse temper<strong>at</strong>ures for several experimental studies' are<br />

compared with <strong>the</strong> present results in Figure 10. As can be seen, <strong>the</strong> reaction r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

constants obtained from <strong>the</strong> present experiment show good agreement with previous<br />

investig<strong>at</strong>ions. The NO-char reaction kinetics can be represented by <strong>the</strong> following<br />

correl<strong>at</strong>ion and this was employed in <strong>the</strong> NO emission modeling. In view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> low<br />

k = 9.66 x loa exp (-<br />

31,700) sec-l ,<br />

RT<br />

superficial velocity, <strong>the</strong> shallow bed, and rel<strong>at</strong>ively small bed diameter, a two-<br />

phase bubble model' with both <strong>the</strong> bubble and emulsion phases tre<strong>at</strong>ed as plug flow<br />

was employed for <strong>the</strong> prediction <strong>of</strong> NO conversion. The NO reduction by Char 1 was<br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ed using this approach over <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> experimental conditions. The com-<br />

parison <strong>of</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ed versus test d<strong>at</strong>a values may be observed in Table 3, as well<br />

as Figure 7. As can be seen in Figure 7, <strong>the</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ed values for NO reduction show<br />

excellent agreement with experimental d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Tests to determine <strong>the</strong> NO reduction capability <strong>of</strong> two different chars and a<br />

metallurgic coke were conducted in an electrically he<strong>at</strong>ed, b<strong>at</strong>ch, fluidized-bed<br />

reactor in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> oxygen. Based on <strong>the</strong> experimental results, <strong>the</strong> following<br />

conclusions can be drawn.<br />

o Reduction <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide depends strongly on <strong>the</strong> physical <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

carbonaceous solids such as specific surface area and pore size distribution;<br />

and, to a lesser extent, on <strong>the</strong> carbon content.<br />

0 Reduction reaction between NO and carbonaceous solids was found to be strongly<br />

influenced by bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure. Within <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ing conditions, <strong>the</strong><br />

degree <strong>of</strong> NO reduction increases with bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure. However, <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal NO and <strong>the</strong> unfavorable sulf<strong>at</strong>ion reaction for n<strong>at</strong>ural sorbents in an<br />

278<br />

I<br />

I<br />

r


<strong>at</strong>mospheric pressure fluidized bed <strong>at</strong> higher temper<strong>at</strong>ure posts an upper limit<br />

on temper<strong>at</strong>ure range for NO and SO emission control. A preferred oper<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure range from thisxstandpo?nt appears to be 80Oo-85O0C.<br />

NO reduction by char increases with char loading in <strong>the</strong> bed. With 1 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

char loading in <strong>the</strong> bed, 90 percent or better NO reduction is <strong>at</strong>tainable for<br />

both Char 1 and Char 2 provided th<strong>at</strong> bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure is maintained <strong>at</strong> or above<br />

8OOOC.<br />

Reaction r<strong>at</strong>e cotstants based on <strong>the</strong> present experimental d<strong>at</strong>a show good agreement<br />

with <strong>the</strong> previous investig<strong>at</strong>ions. The r<strong>at</strong>e constant can be represented by<br />

<strong>the</strong> following correl<strong>at</strong>ion:<br />

k = 9.66 x lo8 exp (- 31 AT 700) see-'<br />

Prediction <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide reduction by Char 1 using a two-phase bubble model<br />

gives good agreement with <strong>the</strong> experimental d<strong>at</strong>a within <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> experi-<br />

mental conditions.<br />

References<br />

1. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fifth Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Conference on Fluidized-Bed Combustion,<br />

Washington, DC, December 1977.<br />

2. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> DOEIWW Conference on Fluidized-Bed Combustion System Design and<br />

Oper<strong>at</strong>ion, Morgantown, WV, October 1980.<br />

3. The proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sixth Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Conference on Fluidized-Bed Combus-<br />

tion, Atlanta, Georgia, August 1980.<br />

4. Pereira, F. J. M. A., "Nitric Oxide Emission from Fluidized Coal Combustion,"<br />

Ph.D. Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, 1975.<br />

5. Gibbs, B. M., F. J. Pereira, and J. M. B;er, "The Influence <strong>of</strong> Air Staging on<br />

<strong>the</strong> NO Emission from a Fluidized-Bed Coal Combustor," Paper Presented <strong>at</strong> 16th<br />

Symposium (Intern<strong>at</strong>ional) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh,<br />

PA, 461, 1977.<br />

6. Bier, 3. M., A. F. Sar<strong>of</strong>im, S. S. Sandhu, M. Andrei, D. Bachovchin, L. K. Chan,<br />

T. Z. Chang, and A. M. Sprouse, "NO Emissions from Fluidized Coal Combustion,"<br />

EPA Grand NO. R804978020 Report, 1979.<br />

7. Furusawa, T., D. Kunii, A. Oguma, and N. Yamada, "Kinetic Study <strong>of</strong> Nitric Oxide<br />

Reduction by CarbOnaCeOuS M<strong>at</strong>erials," Kagaku Kogaku Rombunshu, 5 (6), 562 (1978).<br />

8. Davidson, 3 . F. and D. Harrison, "Fluidized Particles," Cambridge University<br />

Press., 1963.<br />

3: sw:515f<br />

279


Ultim<strong>at</strong>e Analysis, Wt %<br />

TABLE 1<br />

Chemical Analysis <strong>of</strong> Carbonaceous Solids<br />

Pittswick<br />

Bituminous Metallurgic<br />

Char 1 Char 2 Coal Coke<br />

Moisture 2.09 0.63 1.35<br />

Ash 16.79 60.05 14.15<br />

Sulfur 0.83 1.64 3.85<br />

Hydrogen 1.35 0.40 5.04<br />

Nitrogen 0.96 0.66 0.98<br />

Total Carbon 75.24 37.90 69.10<br />

Oxygen (by difference) 2.74 1.28 5.53<br />

Elemental Analysis, Wt %<br />

Silicon, SiO,<br />

Aluminum, A1,0,<br />

Iron, Fe20,<br />

Calcium, CaO<br />

Magnesium, MgO<br />

Sodium, NapO<br />

Potassium, K,O<br />

Phosphorus, P,OB<br />

Titanium, TiO,<br />

Sulfur, SO,<br />

1 : sw:515f7<br />

35.06<br />

16.91<br />

14.84<br />

11.32<br />

4.48<br />

--<br />

0.70<br />

0.73<br />

0.85<br />

6.50<br />

84.51<br />

7.62<br />

5.38<br />

0.49<br />

0.01<br />

280<br />

--<br />

0.62<br />

0.05<br />

0.34<br />

1.63<br />

49.16<br />

23.66<br />

17.72<br />

1.55<br />

0.85<br />

1.23<br />

2.59<br />

0.05<br />

1.21<br />

1.72<br />

0.09<br />

10.07<br />

0.83<br />

0.53<br />

0.84<br />

87.40<br />

0.23<br />

44.19<br />

19.34<br />

17.76<br />

5.75<br />

0.98<br />

2.20<br />

1.53<br />

0.32<br />

1.21<br />

4.06


1'<br />

TABLE 2<br />

Screen Analysis <strong>of</strong> Sand<br />

Size Range, m W t %<br />

-0.589.+ 0.419 2.2<br />

-0.419 + 0.249 72.7<br />

-0.249 + 0.179 18.9<br />

-0.179 + 0.150 4.2<br />

-0.150 1.0<br />

Hean Diameter, d = 0.286 mm<br />

P<br />

TABLE 3<br />

Experimental Results <strong>of</strong> NO Reduction by Char 1<br />

Run Char sand T "'in Noout 'mf U Ld Lf<br />

No. 8 Ut % * -c p p DP. Vlhr m/S "IS n o em. c.1. lllec<br />

1-28-1 12 0.01031 1164 600 965 765 0.85 5.5 10.6 IO 12.065 0.42 0.172 0.837 15.471<br />

5-2.3-2 12 0.01031 1164 650 9h5 615 0.85 5.5 11.2 LO 12.065 0.42 0.631 0.637 28.622<br />

5-28-3 12 0.01031 1164 700 965 360 0.85 5.5 11.8 IO 12.065 0.42 0.373 0.360 61.269<br />

5-28-4 12 0.01031 1164 750 965 125 0.85 5.5 12.4 10 12.065 0.42 0.130 0.128 155.295<br />

5-28-5 12 0.01031 1164 800 965 25 0.85 5.5 13.0 10 12.065 0.42 0.026 0.030 341.263<br />

6-5-1 26<br />

6-5-2 24<br />

6-5-3 26<br />

6-54 24<br />

6-8-1 36<br />

6-8-2 36<br />

6-8-3 36<br />

6-9-1 48<br />

6-9-2 48<br />

0.02062<br />

0.02062<br />

0.02062<br />

0.02062<br />

0,03093<br />

0.03093<br />

0.03093<br />

0.04124<br />

o.o!l124<br />

1164 600 980<br />

1164 650 980<br />

1164 700 980<br />

1164 750 980<br />

1164 600 975<br />

1164 650 975<br />

1164 700 975<br />

1164 6on 985<br />

1164 643 9115<br />

660<br />

390<br />

150<br />

10<br />

580<br />

300<br />

60<br />

475<br />

215<br />

0.85 5.5 10.6 10 12.065 0.42 0.673 0.701 11.842<br />

0.85 5.5 11.2 10 12.065 0.42 0.397 0.409 29.532<br />

0.85 5.5 11.8 IO 12.065 0.42 0.153 0.131 65.716<br />

0.85 5.5 12.4 IO 12.065 0.42 0.010 0.023 199.890<br />

0.85 5.5 10.6 IO 12.065 0.02 0.595 0.588 10.389<br />

0.85 5.5 11.2 10 12.065 0.42 0.308 0.264 25.311<br />

0.85 5.5 11.8 IO 12.065 0.42 0.062 0.055 67.035<br />

0.85 5.5 10.6 IO 12.065 0.42 0.482 0.496 10.969<br />

0.85 5.5 -: -- -- -- 0.218 -- __<br />

281


TABLE 4<br />

Experimental Results <strong>of</strong> NO Reduction by Char 2<br />

6-1-1 12.85 1164 850 955 0 0.85 13.6 5.5 0<br />

.6-1-8 12.85 1164 800 955 15 0.85 13.0 5.5 0.019<br />

6-1-Y 12.85 1114 150 955 250 0.85 12.4 5.5 0.262<br />

6-1-10 12.85 1164 '100 955 52s 0.85 11.8 5.5 0.550<br />

6-1-11 12.85 1164 650 955 700 0.85 11-2 5.5 0.133<br />

6-1-12 12.15 1164 600 955 190 0.85 10.6 0.821<br />

6-4-1 25.7 1164 850 940 30 0.85 13.6 5.5 0.031<br />

6-3-2 Z5.1 1164 800 9 U 62 0.85 13.0 5.5 0.064<br />

6-1-3 25.7 I164 150 940 165 o.as 12.4 5.5 0.116<br />

6-34 15.7 1164 100 940 490 0.85 11.8 5.5 0.521<br />

6-3-5 25.1 1164 650 440 665 0.85 11.2 5.5 0.701<br />

6-3-6 25.1 1164 600 940 160 P.85 10.6 L.5 0.809<br />

%k~l.~eA r.lue. bascd om tbc .ssurpLlou t:r.L rolarilcs in One c-1 cscapcd ~YCLY,<br />

cb.c 1orurioo.<br />

TABLE 5<br />

Experimental Results <strong>of</strong> NO Reduction by Metallurgic Coke<br />

Bum Coke 8a.A T ~0"' u u.i - W."t<br />

Ma. I a *C PPP PP. H1/hr cm/S r=/S<br />

6-S-1 24 1160 700 940 900 0.85 11.8 5.5 0.951<br />

6-2-0 14 1160 750 940 855 0.85 11.4 5.5 0.910<br />

b-1-Y 24 1164 800 940 770 0.85 13.0 5.5 .0.819<br />

m-ia 16 ii6c oa 940 610 0.1s 11.6 5.5 0.-<br />

TABLE 6<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> Reactivity for Different Carbonaceous Solids<br />

hactlrlry<br />

SILE Bm Surface Area Cbrr &A hc-rlal Y, T Wio Wour ~-ol-NO-B.Auc.l<br />

ncril .'Is I (S.nJ) 1 n'lhr *C PIU Plu eor-chr - br<br />

Q.r I 30 I 70 190 I4 11bC 0.85 100 980 150 1.31 ; lo-'<br />

Bar 1 8 I 12 2.4683 25.1 1164<br />

C4. 12 s 20 0.9 24 llb4<br />

282<br />

0.05 100 940 490 6.64 a lo-'<br />

0.85 100 940 Yo0 b.32'1 10')'


n<br />

RECORDER<br />

I Ill I<br />

’ NO. NOX<br />

THERM0 -<br />

SlRIP CHART<br />

J-l<br />

0 ROTAMETEA<br />

-<br />

=----.<br />

FIGURE 1 - SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS<br />

283<br />

$g<br />

0 ROTAMETER


1.0<br />

I I I l , , 1 ! 1<br />

IO 20<br />

Gas Velocity, crnlsec<br />

FIGURE 2. Pressure Drop Versus Gas Velocity<br />

7oD M rm 150<br />

IMBA7W€ 'C<br />

5 0.8s U'lhr<br />

SAND 1165 q<br />

1"6"=5<br />

s YJI P P<br />

0 con<br />

0 OUR 2<br />

21<br />

2S.7<br />

1olm<br />

Bq<br />

YW<br />

W<br />

A aut I m mm<br />

FIGURE 3. Comparison <strong>of</strong> NO Reduction by Different Carbonaceous Solids<br />

284


\<br />

285<br />

Y<br />

0<br />

I-<br />

5<br />

B<br />

5<br />

3 m<br />

"9<br />

E5<br />

3<br />

uz<br />

0<br />

5 0<br />

a.<br />

3<br />

m<br />

0<br />

Y<br />

W<br />

W 4<br />

z<br />

Y<br />

0<br />

2<br />

m<br />

Y<br />

0<br />

W<br />

4<br />

P


n E<br />

P<br />

m<br />

a,<br />

4 3<br />

P<br />

"!oN/~"oN<br />

286


CHAR1 TOC<br />

0.85 M3/k 600<br />

0 700<br />

V 750<br />

0 1 2 3<br />

CHARwBEDmx<br />

FIGURE 9. Effect <strong>of</strong> Char Loading on NO Reduction<br />

- 1<br />

FUIUfXdA d: a!<br />

IEi2 .t ai.<br />

IO<br />

0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.1 '.Y 1.5<br />

id / TWWTURE : K-I<br />

FIGURE 10. Comparison <strong>of</strong> R<strong>at</strong>e Constants for<br />

NO Reduction by Char<br />

287


Introduction<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> particle size on <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> a fluidised bed <strong>coal</strong> combustor<br />

by<br />

M. Brikci-Nigassa, E.S. Garbett and A.B. Hedley<br />

Sheffield Coal Research Unit, Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical<br />

Engineering and Fuel Technology, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield<br />

Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom.<br />

The technology <strong>of</strong> fluidised bed <strong>coal</strong> combustion (FBC) and its advantages<br />

over conventional <strong>coal</strong> burning systems is now well established and is<br />

extensively reported in <strong>the</strong> liter<strong>at</strong>ure C1,2,3,4). A common way <strong>of</strong> introducing<br />

<strong>coal</strong> to <strong>the</strong> bed is via <strong>coal</strong> feed points in <strong>the</strong> distributor pl<strong>at</strong>e and for this<br />

method it is usual to use crushed <strong>coal</strong> <strong>of</strong> particles less <strong>the</strong>n 6 mm. Problems<br />

associ<strong>at</strong>ed with this method include <strong>the</strong> determin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> correct number and<br />

spacing <strong>of</strong> feed points, blockages and <strong>the</strong> obvious expense in <strong>coal</strong> prepar<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Crushed <strong>coal</strong> is used because ir. was thought necessary to keep <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> particle<br />

sizes approxim<strong>at</strong>ely equal to those making up <strong>the</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong> bed and so maintain good<br />

fluidis<strong>at</strong>ion characteristics. However, Highley et al. (5) showed th<strong>at</strong> large <strong>coal</strong><br />

particles (< 50 mm) could be burnt quite easily in an FBC whilst <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> same time<br />

overcoming <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> feed problems outlined above by overbed feeding. Also, using<br />

uncrushed <strong>coal</strong> allows <strong>the</strong> bed and freeboard heights to be reduced (5) making<br />

obvious savings in capital and running costs. An increase in <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

particle fed to <strong>the</strong> combustor results in an increase in <strong>the</strong> bed carbon loading<br />

(6) which influence such important phenomena as NO emissions and elutri<strong>at</strong>ion (7).<br />

However, <strong>the</strong>re is little inform<strong>at</strong>ion on <strong>the</strong> effect on <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> an FBC<br />

due to a vari<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> particle size in <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> feed. This paper '<strong>the</strong>refore,<br />

reports a study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion <strong>of</strong> monosized <strong>coal</strong> fractions fed continuously to<br />

<strong>the</strong> bed via an overbed feeder. D<strong>at</strong>a showing <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> size, excess air<br />

and combustion efficiency are presented. Measurements using crushed <strong>coal</strong><br />

(< 1.5 mm) fed pneum<strong>at</strong>ically to <strong>the</strong> bed are included for comparison.<br />

2. Experimental procedure<br />

T'ne fluidised bed combustor shown schem<strong>at</strong>ically in Fig. 1, was 0.3 m square<br />

section and 1.83 m high and constructed from stainless steel, <strong>the</strong> walls being<br />

insul<strong>at</strong>ed with kaowool. The bed which was 0.6 m deep, consisted <strong>of</strong> sand <strong>of</strong> mean<br />

particle size 600 pm. Fluidising air was introduced to <strong>the</strong> bed through a bubble<br />

cap distributor pl<strong>at</strong>e. Crushed <strong>coal</strong> (< 1.5 mm) was fed pneum<strong>at</strong>ically into <strong>the</strong><br />

bed from a sealed hopper via a calibr<strong>at</strong>ed rotary valve feeder (Fig. 1). Large<br />

<strong>coal</strong> (N.C.B. 501) previously sieved to give monosized fractions (6.3, 9.5 and<br />

12.5 mm) was fed by a vibr<strong>at</strong>ory feeder from a pressurised hopper to <strong>the</strong> surface<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed. A vibr<strong>at</strong>ory feeding system was adopted after degrad<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong><br />

feed occurred when a screw feeder was initially used. The large <strong>coal</strong> passed over<br />

two grids which allowed any fines present to fall through. Start up <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

was achieved using an overbed gas burner which prehe<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> bed to 725 K before<br />

<strong>coal</strong> was injected. Particul<strong>at</strong>e carry over in <strong>the</strong> gaseous combustion products was<br />

removed by a two-stage cyclone. Solids separ<strong>at</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> cyclones dropped into<br />

c<strong>at</strong>chpots (Fig. 1). In order to measure <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> elutri<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> m<strong>at</strong>erial<br />

during steady-st<strong>at</strong>e combustion, <strong>the</strong> carry over from <strong>the</strong> combustor was diverted<br />

intoa seper<strong>at</strong>e c<strong>at</strong>chpot. The temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed was controlled by a cooling<br />

coil immersed in <strong>the</strong> bed. Thermocouples were loc<strong>at</strong>ed in three positions in <strong>the</strong><br />

bed: top, middle and bottom and also in <strong>the</strong> freeboard (Fig. 1). All bed and<br />

freeboard temper<strong>at</strong>ures and <strong>the</strong> cooling w<strong>at</strong>er temper<strong>at</strong>ure were recorded<br />

continuously on chart recorders.<br />

200


f<br />

Durin all <strong>the</strong> experimental runs <strong>the</strong> fluidising velocity was kept constant<br />

(% 0.8 ms- ) and changes in stoichiometry were achieved by varying <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> feed<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e to <strong>the</strong> combustor. Gas samples were obtained from <strong>the</strong> bed, freeboard and<br />

exit flue by means <strong>of</strong> sampling ports loc<strong>at</strong>ed along one wall <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustor.<br />

W<strong>at</strong>er cooled stainless steel probes lined with silica were used for gas sampling.<br />

An on-line chemiluninescent analysis (TECO Model 10A) was used to determine <strong>the</strong><br />

nitric oxide content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion gas.<br />

3. Experimental results<br />

3.1 NO emissions<br />

NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ions throughout <strong>the</strong>. bed and freeboard for <strong>the</strong> crushed <strong>coal</strong><br />

(< 1.5 mm) are shown in Fig. 2 for bed temper<strong>at</strong>ures ranging between 1043 and 1193<br />

K. A sharp increase in NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion is observed from 400 to 1300 ppm for a<br />

bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> 1043 K and concentr<strong>at</strong>ions rise to 1500 ppm <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

bed for Tb = 1193 K. For all <strong>the</strong> bed temper<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>the</strong>re is a sharp decrease in<br />

NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion through <strong>the</strong> freeboard giving exit values <strong>of</strong> 375 ppm for<br />

Tb 1043 K and 700 ppm for Tb = 1193 K. Similar trends are seen in Fig. 3 for<br />

<strong>the</strong> large <strong>coal</strong>s (6.3, 9.5 and 12.5 mm). The concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> NO <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> bed are <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> 1400 pprn and <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> exit <strong>the</strong>y have fallen to 500 ppm<br />

for a bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> 1143 K. These measurements were repe<strong>at</strong>ed for different<br />

values <strong>of</strong> excess air (XSA) and Fig. 4 shows <strong>the</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> exit flue (corrected to 3% 02) for XSA values <strong>of</strong> between 6 and 47% for all<br />

<strong>the</strong> large <strong>coal</strong>s <strong>at</strong> Tb = 1043 and 1093 K. For <strong>the</strong> 6.3 mm <strong>coal</strong> <strong>at</strong> 10% XSA and<br />

Tb = 1043 <strong>the</strong> NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion is 360 ppm; <strong>the</strong> corresponding value <strong>at</strong> Tb = 1093 K<br />

is 475 ppm. After <strong>the</strong>se initial values <strong>the</strong> NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong> both<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ures show a sharp increase to about XSA = 25% followed by a levelling <strong>of</strong>f<br />

for higher values <strong>of</strong> XSA. These trends are repe<strong>at</strong>ed for <strong>the</strong> 9.5 mm <strong>coal</strong> but with<br />

reduced concentr<strong>at</strong>ions throughout. It was expected th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12.5 mm would show a<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r overall decrease in NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion but as can be seen in Fig. 4 <strong>the</strong><br />

12.5 mm curve falls between those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 6.3 and 9.5 mm <strong>coal</strong>s still, however,<br />

showing <strong>the</strong> same trends as <strong>the</strong> l<strong>at</strong>ter two sizes.<br />

3.2 Elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es<br />

The measured elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es under steadyst<strong>at</strong>e conditions are shown in<br />

Figs. 5, 6 and 7. Fig. 5 shows <strong>the</strong> total carry over Ci.e. ash and carbon)<br />

leaving <strong>the</strong> combustor for <strong>the</strong> 9.5 mm <strong>coal</strong> <strong>at</strong> different levels <strong>of</strong> excess air and<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure. A sharp decrease in elutri<strong>at</strong>ed m<strong>at</strong>erial is observed when <strong>the</strong> level<br />

<strong>of</strong> excess air is increased from 10% to about 20%; this r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> decrease reduces<br />

as <strong>the</strong> excess air is increased beyond 20%. The carbon content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carry over<br />

m<strong>at</strong>erial for <strong>the</strong> 9.5 m <strong>coal</strong> is plotted against <strong>the</strong> excess air for <strong>the</strong> four bed<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ures (Fig. 6). The proportion <strong>of</strong> carbon in <strong>the</strong> carry over decreases with<br />

increasing temper<strong>at</strong>ure and excess air. The same trend is observed for all <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>coal</strong> sizes studied (17).<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> particle size on <strong>the</strong> carry over and carbon loss <strong>at</strong> 20%<br />

excess air is indic<strong>at</strong>ed in Fig. 7. A sharp decrease in carry over is observed<br />

when <strong>coal</strong> sizes <strong>of</strong> increasing diameters are used in <strong>the</strong> fluidised bed combustor.<br />

Beyond <strong>the</strong> 9.5 mm <strong>coal</strong> size, elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es level <strong>of</strong>f and as <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure increases, show an upturn (Fig. 7). This unexpected behaviour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

carry over due to <strong>the</strong> 12.5 mm <strong>coal</strong> is in parallel with <strong>the</strong> NO results for <strong>the</strong><br />

same <strong>coal</strong> as discussed above.<br />

3.3 Combustion efficiency<br />

The quantity <strong>of</strong> he<strong>at</strong> lost as carbon elutri<strong>at</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> combustor is <strong>the</strong><br />

major factor affecting <strong>the</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong> fluidised bed <strong>coal</strong> combustors.<br />

Combustion effiency has been determined for each <strong>coal</strong> particle size <strong>at</strong> about 20%<br />

excess air. The results are shown in table 1 in terms <strong>of</strong> carbon percentage<br />

combustion efficiency. Loss <strong>of</strong> carbon occurred almost entirely hy elutri<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

289


j<br />

Temp (K)<br />

Table 1. Combustion Efficiency as a function<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> size and bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

Combustion efficiency<br />

@ 20% XSA<br />

12.5 nun<br />

An increased carbon combustion efficiency is achieved with <strong>the</strong> increase <strong>of</strong><br />

air up to about 20-25%, a fur<strong>the</strong>r increase in excess air beyond this value does<br />

not improve <strong>the</strong> carbon combustion efficiency significantly. The combustion<br />

efficiency is observed to increase with bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure for <strong>the</strong> 6.3 and 9.5 nun<br />

<strong>coal</strong>s (table 1). The 12.5 mm results show only a slight sensitivity to bed<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure (1043 K - 1193 k, 20% excess air). The highest carbon combustion<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> 95% is achieved with <strong>the</strong> 9.5 nun <strong>at</strong> a bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> 1193 K<br />

(table 1).<br />

4. Discussion<br />

The levels <strong>of</strong> NO <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> exit <strong>of</strong> an FBC may be expressed as a sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion and reduction, without specifying any mechanisms, as follows<br />

R<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> NO<br />

emitted <strong>at</strong> =<br />

<strong>the</strong> flue<br />

R<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

form<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

R<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

- reduction +<br />

R<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

form<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

R<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

- reduction<br />

in <strong>the</strong> in <strong>the</strong> in <strong>the</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />

bed bed freeboard freeboard<br />

A B C D<br />

it is clear from Figs. 2 z d 3 th<strong>at</strong> A > B and D : C for all <strong>the</strong> cools used in<br />

<strong>the</strong>se experiments. There are many experimental d<strong>at</strong>a available which show th<strong>at</strong> NO<br />

reduction in an FBC can take place via NO-char reactions (8,9,10) and so <strong>the</strong><br />

level <strong>of</strong> NO reduction may be expected to be proportional to <strong>the</strong> carbon loading in<br />

<strong>the</strong> bed, which in turn is proportional to <strong>the</strong> diameter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> particles in<br />

<strong>the</strong> feed. When large <strong>coal</strong> is fed to <strong>the</strong> bea <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> NO form<strong>at</strong>ion will be<br />

slower and lower than for crushed <strong>coal</strong> but <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> reduction will also be<br />

lower even for larger carbon loading because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> low carbon surface area per<br />

unit mass.<br />

This could explain why, as shown in Figures 2 and 3, approxim<strong>at</strong>ely <strong>the</strong> same<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ion are observed <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bed for both crushed<br />

and large <strong>coal</strong>s. These similar levels <strong>of</strong> NO also contradict <strong>the</strong> suggestion (11)<br />

th<strong>at</strong> overbed feeding <strong>of</strong> large <strong>coal</strong> may increase NO reduction <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

bed due to an increased carbon loading in th<strong>at</strong> region. The NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ions in<br />

<strong>the</strong> 0.3 m square FBC, <strong>the</strong>refore, appear to be independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> feed position<br />

and size <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> fed. The major portion <strong>of</strong> NO reduction reported here, takes<br />

place in <strong>the</strong> freeboard (Figs. 2 and 3).<br />

occurs in <strong>the</strong> region immedi<strong>at</strong>ely above <strong>the</strong> bed where <strong>the</strong> char concentr<strong>at</strong>ion is<br />

high due to splashing. It is in <strong>the</strong> freeboard <strong>the</strong>n th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> carbon<br />

loading in <strong>the</strong> bed on NO reduction is most evident since <strong>the</strong> level observed for<br />

<strong>the</strong> 9.5 mn <strong>coal</strong> are lower than for <strong>the</strong> 6.3 m and crushed <strong>coal</strong>s. The NO levels<br />

in <strong>the</strong> freeboard are seen to decrease exponentially with height (Figs. 2 and 3)<br />

in <strong>the</strong> same manner as <strong>the</strong> solids popul<strong>at</strong>ion decreases (12).<br />

290<br />

93<br />

In particular <strong>the</strong> highest reduction r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

1)


Assuming th<strong>at</strong> large <strong>coal</strong> particles do not break when introduced to <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

<strong>the</strong>n it would be expected th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e would be significantly<br />

reduced compared to when crushed <strong>coal</strong> is fed to <strong>the</strong> bed. Figure 5 shows a<br />

reduction in <strong>the</strong> elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> carbon as <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> feed particle size<br />

increases but <strong>the</strong> difference is not as gre<strong>at</strong> as would be expected bearing in mind<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> large <strong>coal</strong> is a monosized feed and does not include any fines. In<br />

particular <strong>the</strong> carbon elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e for <strong>the</strong> 12.5 mm <strong>coal</strong> although initially<br />

(Tb = 1043 K) less than th<strong>at</strong> measured for <strong>the</strong> 9.5 mm subsequently becomes gre<strong>at</strong>er<br />

for Tb > 1093 K.<br />

This may be explained by <strong>the</strong> fact th<strong>at</strong> this <strong>coal</strong> (12.5 mm) in<br />

particular suffers from breakage due to <strong>the</strong>rmal shock when introduced to <strong>the</strong> bed.<br />

This also explains why <strong>the</strong> NO concentr<strong>at</strong>ions for this <strong>coal</strong> fall between those<br />

measured for <strong>the</strong> 6.3 and 9.5 nun <strong>coal</strong>s (Fig. 4). Particle <strong>at</strong>trition may also be<br />

significant within <strong>the</strong> bed (13,14,15) particularly for <strong>the</strong> larger <strong>coal</strong>s. Merrick<br />

and Highley (16) derive an expression for particle size reduction due to<br />

<strong>at</strong>trition based on Rittingers Law <strong>of</strong> abrasion and showed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> shrinkage r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

was proportional to <strong>the</strong> particle size viz:<br />

Thus <strong>the</strong> elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e for <strong>the</strong> larger <strong>coal</strong>s could be significantly enhanced<br />

due to <strong>at</strong>trition phenomena. The lowest elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es observed (Fig. 7) are<br />

for <strong>the</strong> 9.5 mm <strong>coal</strong> <strong>at</strong> 1193 K and 20% XSA. The effect <strong>of</strong> increasing <strong>the</strong> bed<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure and excess air will be to increase <strong>the</strong> combustion r<strong>at</strong>e with a<br />

consequent reduction in <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> carbon thrown into <strong>the</strong> freeboard. Thus <strong>the</strong><br />

elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es will decrease for an increase in both Tb and XSA. This trend<br />

can be seen in Figs. 5 and 6.<br />

5. Conc.lusions<br />

The measurements <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide concentr<strong>at</strong>ions in <strong>the</strong> bed and freeboard <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> 0.3 m square fluidised bed have shown th<strong>at</strong> nitric oxide is produced within<br />

<strong>the</strong> bed and are reduced in <strong>the</strong> freeboard. Elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es and NO<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ions measured <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> exit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> freeboard both decrease with<br />

increasing <strong>coal</strong> particle size up to a size <strong>of</strong> 9.5 mm for most conditions. The<br />

combustion <strong>of</strong> monosized <strong>coal</strong> particles in <strong>the</strong> fluidised bed has highlighted <strong>the</strong><br />

interdependence <strong>of</strong> elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e, bed carbon content, carbon concentr<strong>at</strong>ion in<br />

<strong>the</strong> freeboard and nitric oxide emissions. The results also indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> an<br />

optimum oper<strong>at</strong>ing condition for this particular fluidised bed combustor may exist<br />

for <strong>the</strong> 9.5 mm <strong>coal</strong> size <strong>at</strong> 20% XSA. However, fur<strong>the</strong>r experimental results are<br />

necessary, in particular with respect to <strong>the</strong> complex phenomena occurring in <strong>the</strong><br />

freeboard region.<br />

6. Acknowledgements<br />

This work forms part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sheffield Coal Research Unit<br />

sponsored by Shell Coal Intern<strong>at</strong>ional and <strong>the</strong> N<strong>at</strong>ional Coal Board, to whom <strong>the</strong><br />

authors are gr<strong>at</strong>eful for financial assistance. The views expressed here are<br />

those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> authors and not necessarily those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sponsors.<br />

7. Nomencl<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

d <strong>coal</strong> particle dia.<br />

P<br />

f(dp) fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> particles in bed smaller than d<br />

P'<br />

H total bed height.<br />

K abrasion constant.<br />

U superficial fluidising velocity.<br />

minimum fluidising velocity.<br />

Umf<br />

Y vertical co-ordinance.<br />

E dimensionless height (= y/H).<br />

291


8. References<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

9.<br />

10.<br />

11.<br />

12.<br />

13.<br />

14.<br />

15.<br />

16.<br />

17.<br />

Skinner, D.G., Fluidised dombustion <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong>, Mills & Boon, Monograph No.<br />

CE/3, 1914.<br />

Inst. <strong>of</strong> Fuel Symp. Ser. No. 1, Fluidised Combustion, 1975, Sessions B, C<br />

and D.<br />

Gibson, J. and Highley, J., J. Inst. Energy, 1979, 52, 51.<br />

Sixth Int. Conf. on Fluidised Bed Combustion, Atlanta, Proceedings, 1980.<br />

Highley, J. et al., Inst. <strong>of</strong> Fuel Symp. Ser., No. 1, Fluidised Combustion,<br />

1975, Paper B3.<br />

Donsi, G. et al., 17th Symp. on Combustion (Int.), Leeds, 1978.<br />

Sar<strong>of</strong>im, A.F. and Beer, J.M., 17th Symp. on Combustion (Int.), Leeds, 1978,<br />

189.<br />

Beer, J.M. et al., 5th Int. Conf. on Fluidised Bed Combustion, Washington<br />

D.C., 1977.<br />

Furusawa, T. and Kunii, K., SOC. <strong>of</strong> Chem. Eng., Japan, 1977.<br />

Gulyurtlu, I., Ph.D. Thesis, Univeraity <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, 1980.<br />

Bachovchin, D.M.,<br />

77, No. 205, 76.<br />

Beer, J.M. and Sar<strong>of</strong>in, A.F., A.1.Ch.E. Symp. Ser., 1981,<br />

-<br />

Lewis, W.K. et al., Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser., 1962, 52, 38.<br />

D'Amore et al., bth inc. Conf. on Fluidised Bed Combustion, Atlanta, 1980,<br />

1, 675.<br />

Beer, J.M. et al., Inst. Energy Symp. Ser., No. 4, London, 1980,<br />

Paper IV-5.<br />

Cowley, L.T. and Roberts, P.T., Fluidised Comb. Conf., Cape Tom, 1981, 2_,<br />

443.<br />

Merrick, D. and Highley, J., A.1.Ch.E. Symp. Ser., 1974, 70, No. 137, 366.<br />

Brikci-Nigassa, M., Ph.D. Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, 1982.<br />

292


i<br />

7<br />

-_<br />

0<br />

m\o<br />

--n<br />

0 W<br />

i<br />

293<br />

a\o<br />

0


CARBON CARRYOVER (g s-'1<br />

0<br />

I<br />

0 0 0<br />

N W c.<br />

CARBON CARRYOVER (g s-')<br />

0<br />

0 - 0 0 0<br />

N w -<br />

CARRYOVER (g 5-'1<br />

0 0<br />

N<br />

0<br />

w<br />

0<br />

c.<br />

I I I I<br />

CARRYOVER (g s-')<br />

0 0 0 0<br />

N<br />

W E ul<br />

294<br />

W D<br />

0 -<br />

-a<br />

00 DO<br />

--00<br />

UlDpIUl-<br />

WWWW<br />

xxxx


The influence <strong>of</strong> particle size distribution on <strong>the</strong><br />

combustion r<strong>at</strong>es in a b<strong>at</strong>ch fed fluidised bed<br />

E.S. Garbett and A.B. Hedley<br />

Sheffield Coal Research Unit, Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering and<br />

Fuel Technology, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, Sheffield, s1 3JD<br />

United Kingdom.<br />

Introduction<br />

The advantages <strong>of</strong> burning <strong>coal</strong> in fluidised bed combustors (FBC) have been<br />

repe<strong>at</strong>edly demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed over <strong>the</strong> past few years and commercial units are now<br />

being built and supplied to industry (1). The design <strong>of</strong> such FBC's is based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> practical experience gained from pilot plant studies and also on <strong>the</strong> predictions<br />

<strong>of</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ical models. Central to any model <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> combustion in FBC's<br />

is <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>at</strong> which particles burn in <strong>the</strong> bed which determines <strong>the</strong> carbon<br />

loading and hence pollutant emission% he<strong>at</strong> release r<strong>at</strong>es, <strong>coal</strong> feed r<strong>at</strong>es and<br />

elutri<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es (2). Particle size and temper<strong>at</strong>ure usually indic<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong><br />

controlling mechanism <strong>of</strong> combustion; large particles and high temper<strong>at</strong>ure suggest<br />

th<strong>at</strong> diffusion is dominant whereas chemical kinetics became important for small<br />

particles and low temper<strong>at</strong>ures (3). In a typical FBC <strong>the</strong> particle sizes range<br />

from th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> input feed down to th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> particles which are<br />

about to be elutri<strong>at</strong>ed and particle temper<strong>at</strong>ures can have a value anywhere<br />

between <strong>the</strong> bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure Tb and T + 200K (4,5,6). It is not unreasonable to<br />

b<br />

assume <strong>the</strong>refore, th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> combustion <strong>of</strong> particles can be controlled by a<br />

combin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> diffusional and chemical processes acting simultaneously. Indeed,<br />

<strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a <strong>of</strong> Avedesian and Davidson (7), where <strong>the</strong> combustion <strong>of</strong> char particles<br />

in a b<strong>at</strong>ch fed fluidised bed was assumed to be diffusion controlled, has<br />

recently (6) been shown to be consistent with <strong>the</strong> altern<strong>at</strong>ive situ<strong>at</strong>ion described<br />

above where both processes are acting toge<strong>the</strong>r. The effect on <strong>the</strong> carbon loading<br />

in an FBC where <strong>the</strong> combustion is ei<strong>the</strong>r controlled by diffusion or by a<br />

combin<strong>at</strong>ion process has been investig<strong>at</strong>ed by Garbett and Hedley (8) who also<br />

showed <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> particle surface temper<strong>at</strong>ures. The particle size<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>coal</strong> feed is a parameter which is important in <strong>the</strong> design<br />

<strong>of</strong> FBC's but whose influence on <strong>the</strong> combustion r<strong>at</strong>es in <strong>the</strong> bed has not been<br />

studied. It is <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper <strong>the</strong>refore, to develop a <strong>the</strong>ory to<br />

predict <strong>the</strong> burnaway, burnout time and particul<strong>at</strong>e phase oxygen concentr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

in a b<strong>at</strong>ch fed FBC and show <strong>the</strong>ir dependence on <strong>the</strong> input particle size<br />

distribution which is accur<strong>at</strong>ely known.<br />

The Model<br />

The model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> b<strong>at</strong>ch fed FBC employed here is essentially <strong>the</strong> two-phase<br />

bubbling bed model <strong>of</strong> Avedesian and Davidson (7) where a bed <strong>of</strong> inert particles<br />

<strong>at</strong> a temper<strong>at</strong>ure Tb is fluidised by air <strong>at</strong> a superficial velocity U and a<br />

minimum fluidised velocity U . The oxygen required for combustionOwhich is<br />

controlled by a combin<strong>at</strong>ion diffusion and chemical kinetics, is transferred<br />

to <strong>the</strong> char particles in <strong>the</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>e phase from <strong>the</strong> bubbles and <strong>the</strong> reaction<br />

is given by C + O2 -+ CO . The b<strong>at</strong>ch is assumed to comprise solely <strong>of</strong> char<br />

particles so th<strong>at</strong> devola&lis<strong>at</strong>ion is negl,?cted. It is also assumed th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> particles do not swell or break up when introduced to <strong>the</strong> bed and so retain<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir original size distribution.<br />

The Theory<br />

The reaction r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> a single particle <strong>of</strong> char <strong>of</strong> mass m in a fluidised bed<br />

where both diffusional and chemical kinetics are considered Eimultaneously, can<br />

be expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> diffusional and chemical resistances as follows (3).<br />

295


R =<br />

K KD C<br />

Kc + KD<br />

where % = -k x<br />

1<br />

Kc = -k2x 2<br />

(See equ<strong>at</strong>ions 28) and 31) for values <strong>of</strong> kl and k2)) C is <strong>the</strong> oxygen<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ion (moles/m3) in <strong>the</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>e phase <strong>of</strong> tge bed and is a function<br />

<strong>of</strong> time.<br />

by<br />

The r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> carbon <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> particle surface is <strong>the</strong>refore given<br />

3<br />

-k k X- Mo C<br />

5 = 1 2 p<br />

2<br />

dt k x + k x<br />

I P 2P<br />

leading to<br />

dx -2M C<br />

p = OP<br />

dt TP<br />

where x is <strong>the</strong> diameter <strong>of</strong> a particle <strong>of</strong> mass m and M is <strong>the</strong> molecular weight<br />

<strong>of</strong> oxyggn. P<br />

klandf = - 1<br />

For convenience let F(C) = 2M C , e = -<br />

op 2 kl<br />

TP<br />

If after a time t a particle whose original diameter was x bums to give<br />

a diameter xt, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

t<br />

t f<br />

Let <strong>the</strong> original size distribution <strong>of</strong> a b<strong>at</strong>ch <strong>of</strong> carbon delivered to <strong>the</strong><br />

fluidised bed be given by an equ<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> form.<br />

w. = e(x) 7)<br />

where W. is <strong>the</strong> initial weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> b<strong>at</strong>ch which consists <strong>of</strong> particles whose<br />

diamete? is gre<strong>at</strong>er than or equal to X. It will be assumed th<strong>at</strong> x must lie in<br />

<strong>the</strong> range x1


all <strong>the</strong> initial values <strong>of</strong> x for which xt > 0. Suppose an initial diameter y is<br />

defined so th<strong>at</strong> all particles with an initial diameter x < yo would have buzed<br />

away completely after a time t, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> mass fraction <strong>of</strong> carbon in <strong>the</strong> bed <strong>at</strong><br />

this time t is<br />

m<br />

m. - =<br />

x=x,<br />

x= z<br />

' $ $(x)dx<br />

where z = x1 if yO&xl<br />

and z = y if yo>xl<br />

X<br />

By substituting y in equ<strong>at</strong>ion 6) we have<br />

t<br />

f 2<br />

F(C)dt = eyo + - y<br />

i 2 0<br />

0<br />

Combining equ<strong>at</strong>ions 6), 8) and 10) gives<br />

x= z<br />

Burnout time<br />

To derive an expression for <strong>the</strong> burn-out time we need to investig<strong>at</strong>e<br />

dm/dt or d(m/mi)/dt. From an oxygen balance on <strong>the</strong> bed (7) we have<br />

3<br />

where C is <strong>the</strong> inlet oxygen concentr<strong>at</strong>ion (mole/m ).<br />

dm/dt<br />

Therefore C = Co + -<br />

P F(Uo)<br />

.J<br />

X<br />

where F(Uo) = 12A[Uo -(Uo-Umf) (exp(-B)) 3<br />

It can <strong>the</strong>refore be shown th<strong>at</strong><br />

Also, from equ<strong>at</strong>ion 13)<br />

r 1<br />

dm/dyo can be found using <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ical identity,<br />

297


Applying this to equ<strong>at</strong>ion 11) gives<br />

where<br />

Substituting dm/dy from equ<strong>at</strong>ion 17) into equ<strong>at</strong>ion 14)<br />

re-arranging and integr<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> result gives<br />

t m m<br />

It can be shown th<strong>at</strong> equ<strong>at</strong>ion 19) reduces to<br />

m. (l-mlmi) ITP yo np Yo<br />

t = I. + - + -<br />

F(Uo)Co 12 8Cokl 64Cok2<br />

The form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> initial size distribution<br />

Assume th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> original carbon sample before any sieving into limited size<br />

range fractions, can be described by a Rosin-Rammler distribution<br />

W = exp (-bxn) 21)<br />

where b and n are constants. If <strong>the</strong> original m<strong>at</strong>erial is <strong>the</strong>n sieved into<br />

limited size fractions and only particles with diameters in <strong>the</strong> range<br />

x


\<br />

- + 1)<br />

x. =<br />

1<br />

bL/n<br />

YO<br />

Defining dimensionless parameters X = 3 and Y = <strong>the</strong>n from equ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

22) we get X. X.<br />

JI(Xi'X) =<br />

where a = [ (+ +1d<br />

na3-l exp (-ax")<br />

exp(-aXln) -exp(-aXZn)<br />

Substitution <strong>of</strong> @(x.,x) from equ<strong>at</strong>ion 24) into equ<strong>at</strong>ion 11) and making o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

appropri<strong>at</strong>e terms dimensionless gives<br />

where<br />

F (x X,Y) =<br />

2 i'<br />

N = exp(-aXln) - exp(-ax n, and Z = 2<br />

2<br />

X.<br />

The lower limit <strong>of</strong> integr<strong>at</strong>ion in equ<strong>at</strong>ion 25) is given by<br />

Z = X ifY,cX<br />

1<br />

1<br />

and<br />

2 = Y ifY>X1<br />

Similarly equ<strong>at</strong>ion 20) for <strong>the</strong> burn-out time, becomes<br />

t =<br />

mi (l-mhi) w(xi - 2Y 2 ) sp(Xiy)<br />

128Cokl +-<br />

+ F(Uo)Co 64C0 k2<br />

and equ<strong>at</strong>ion 15), <strong>the</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>e phase oxygen concentr<strong>at</strong>ion, becomes<br />

1<br />

P F(Uo) np<br />

where<br />

= co[ I -<br />

i<br />

x2 -<br />

192klmi fF3(xi ,X,Y) d<br />

2<br />

299<br />

2 7)


Numerical Cal cu 1 a ti on s<br />

The diffusion constant kl from equ<strong>at</strong>ion 2) can be expressed as follows (7)<br />

kl = 2nkD 2 8)<br />

E<br />

where k is a constant rel<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> mass <strong>of</strong> carbon consumed to <strong>the</strong> mass <strong>of</strong> O2<br />

transported to <strong>the</strong> particle surface. It is assumed here th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> carbonoxygen<br />

reaction can be represented by C + O2 -f co2 so th<strong>at</strong> k = 12/32<br />

% is <strong>the</strong> effective diffusion coefficient and can be represented by (7)<br />

where Sh is <strong>the</strong> local particle Sherwood Number and Dc is <strong>the</strong> diffusion<br />

coefficient calcul<strong>at</strong>ed from (3)<br />

DG = D. - (Pi)<br />

1.75<br />

The chemical constant k,, can be represented by (10,ll)<br />

k2 = k’ Tbf exp(- E/R T )<br />

g P<br />

The above d<strong>at</strong>a is summarised in Table 1. The bed d<strong>at</strong>a used in <strong>the</strong><br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ions are th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> Avedesian and Davidson (7).<br />

Table 1<br />

D<strong>at</strong>a used in calcul<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

Symbol Value<br />

k<br />

T.<br />

D.<br />

Tb<br />

T P<br />

k’<br />

Sh<br />

E<br />

PIPi<br />

0.375<br />

1000 K<br />

1.61<br />

1173 K<br />

1173 K<br />

1034<br />

1.8<br />

15 K cal/mole K<br />

1<br />

Reference<br />

The three distributions used in <strong>the</strong> calcul<strong>at</strong>ions are summarised in Table 2.<br />

In all <strong>the</strong> results presented here <strong>the</strong> top and bottom size <strong>of</strong> each distribution<br />

were constant <strong>at</strong> 3 and 0.3mm respectively.<br />

300<br />

I<br />

I


$<br />

m.<br />

1<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> m/mi-<br />

1.5<br />

0.1813<br />

0.9033<br />

0.3m<br />

3mm<br />

5gm<br />

Table 2<br />

Particle size d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

b=11.12 b=625<br />

4<br />

0.1813m<br />

0.9064<br />

0.3m<br />

3m<br />

5gm<br />

4<br />

0.0906m<br />

0.9064<br />

0.3m<br />

To demonstr<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> results to be expected from <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory<br />

equ<strong>at</strong>ion 25) was numerically integr<strong>at</strong>ed to give values <strong>of</strong> m/m. for increasing<br />

values <strong>of</strong> Y using <strong>the</strong> values <strong>of</strong> kl and k2 indic<strong>at</strong>ed in Table and <strong>the</strong><br />

distributions in Table 2.<br />

diffusional and chemical cases were calcul<strong>at</strong>ed using a method similar to th<strong>at</strong><br />

described by Leesley and Siddall (9) for pulverised fuel. Figures 1, 2 and<br />

3 show <strong>the</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> m/mi, <strong>the</strong> unburnt fraction <strong>of</strong> carbon remaining, with<br />

<strong>the</strong> dimensionless particle diameter Y for <strong>the</strong> three original distributions.<br />

In every case <strong>the</strong> combined curve mC+D/m; falls inside <strong>the</strong> envelope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two<br />

extreme conditions <strong>of</strong> pure diffusional (mD/mi) and <strong>of</strong> pure chemical (mc/m;).<br />

The curves represented in <strong>the</strong>se figures (1,2, and 3) are not burnaway r<strong>at</strong>es<br />

but indic<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> changing particle size distribution as <strong>the</strong> b<strong>at</strong>ch disappears.<br />

For example, in figure I, when 50% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> b<strong>at</strong>ch has burnt away (i.e. m/mi = 0.5)<br />

<strong>the</strong> combined case requires th<strong>at</strong> all particles <strong>of</strong> a size below 18% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

maximum particle size in <strong>the</strong> original b<strong>at</strong>ch must have disappeared.<br />

values for <strong>the</strong> pure diffusion case and pure chemical case are 34% and 12% respect-<br />

ively. Thus for a given carbon loading <strong>the</strong> carbon particle size distribution<br />

in <strong>the</strong> bed will be different for different combustion mechanisms and this will<br />

obviously influence important phenomena such as elutri<strong>at</strong>ion, and NO reduction<br />

by char. To cambine Figures 1 to 3 for comparison purposes <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a have been<br />

represented in Figure 4 as a r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> unburnt fraction for <strong>the</strong> combined case (m<br />

C+D)<br />

to th<strong>at</strong> for <strong>the</strong> diffusion case (%) as a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> particle diameter<br />

Y. It is clearly seen th<strong>at</strong> as <strong>the</strong> original size distribution moves from a wide<br />

one (n=1.5, b=11.12) to a fine one (n=4.0, b=10,000) <strong>the</strong> difference between<br />

mC+D and % increases<br />

Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> t<br />

3mm<br />

5 gm<br />

For comparison <strong>the</strong> values <strong>of</strong> m/m; for <strong>the</strong> pure<br />

Corresponding<br />

The burnawayr<strong>at</strong>es<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> b<strong>at</strong>ch for each original size distribution and for a<br />

combustion mechanism where both diffsuion and chemical kinetics are acting<br />

simoultaneouslywere calcul<strong>at</strong>ed from equ<strong>at</strong>ion 26) and are shown in Figure 5. The<br />

burnaway r<strong>at</strong>e is higher for <strong>the</strong> distribution represented by n=4.0, b=10,000<br />

than for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two distributions as would be expected. Wh<strong>at</strong> is not evident<br />

301


from Figure 5, due to <strong>the</strong> scale, is th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> time for total burnaway is <strong>the</strong> same<br />

for each distribution since <strong>the</strong>y all have <strong>the</strong> same maximum particle size <strong>of</strong> 3m.<br />

Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> C<br />

P<br />

Equ<strong>at</strong>ion 27) was numeric<strong>at</strong>ly integr<strong>at</strong>ed to give <strong>the</strong> particul<strong>at</strong>e oxygen<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ion C for <strong>the</strong> three distributions. The results are shown in<br />

Figure 6. An igteresting fe<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se results is <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> Cp <strong>at</strong> t=o.<br />

According to Avedesian and Davidson 17) <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> 5 should be almost zero<br />

for <strong>the</strong> b<strong>at</strong>ch fed system but it is clear from Figure 6 th<strong>at</strong> this is not <strong>the</strong> case.<br />

Equ<strong>at</strong>ions 25), 26) and 27) are valid only for constant temper<strong>at</strong>ure and<br />

pressure. These conditions are usually met in FBC's except th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> particle<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure Tp can vary during burnaway and can be appreciably higher than<br />

<strong>the</strong> bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure (4,5,6). The effect <strong>of</strong> increasing Tp would be to increase<br />

<strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> k2 rel<strong>at</strong>ive to kl and <strong>the</strong> controlling mechanism would tend<br />

towards th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> diffusion. Increasing <strong>the</strong> pressure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system would only<br />

have a significant effect if <strong>the</strong> combustion r<strong>at</strong>e was initially domin<strong>at</strong>ed by<br />

chemical kinetics.<br />

Conclusions<br />

A <strong>the</strong>oretical model has been developed which predicts <strong>the</strong> change in size<br />

distribution during burnaway, burn-out times and particul<strong>at</strong>e phase oxygen<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ions as a function <strong>of</strong> original particle size distribution in a b<strong>at</strong>ch<br />

fed fluidised bed.<br />

b<strong>at</strong>ch fed experiment could be devised to determine <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> chemical kinetics<br />

for a given type <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> and would thus be an aid to modelling <strong>of</strong> fluidised bed<br />

combus tion.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

If <strong>the</strong> original size distribution is accur<strong>at</strong>ely known a<br />

The work described here form part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sheffield<br />

Coal Research Unit sponsored by Shell Coal Intern<strong>at</strong>ional and <strong>the</strong> N.C.B.. The<br />

authors are gr<strong>at</strong>eful for <strong>the</strong> financial assistance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sponsors and wish to<br />

point out th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> views expressed here are those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> authors and not<br />

necessarily those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sponsors. We are also gr<strong>at</strong>eful to Dr. R.G. Siddall and<br />

Dr. P.J. Foster for many illumin<strong>at</strong>ing discussions.<br />

Nomencl<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

Constant defined by equ<strong>at</strong>ion 24)<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> fluidised bed (m2)<br />

Rosin-Rammler constant - equ<strong>at</strong>ion 21)<br />

Oxygen exchange parameter - equ<strong>at</strong>ion 12)<br />

Oxygen concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> fluidising air (mole/m 3 )<br />

3<br />

Particul<strong>at</strong>e phase oxygen concentr<strong>at</strong>ion (mole/rn )<br />

Gas diffusion coefficient (m2/s)<br />

constant (= l/k2)<br />

constant (= l/kl)<br />

Defined by equ<strong>at</strong>ion 12)<br />

Function <strong>of</strong> Oxygen concentr<strong>at</strong>ion (= 2M C /~p)<br />

O P<br />

302


kl<br />

k2<br />

k'<br />

KC<br />

KD<br />

m<br />

m.<br />

m<br />

P<br />

N<br />

P<br />

R<br />

R<br />

g<br />

t<br />

T<br />

Tb<br />

T.<br />

T<br />

P<br />

'mf<br />

'0<br />

W<br />

X<br />

-<br />

X.<br />

1<br />

X<br />

P<br />

Xt<br />

X<br />

YO<br />

Y<br />

Z<br />

Z<br />

Constant defined by equ<strong>at</strong>ion 2)<br />

Constant defined by equ<strong>at</strong>ion 3)<br />

Constant defined by equ<strong>at</strong>ion 31)<br />

Chemical r<strong>at</strong>e constant<br />

Diffusional r<strong>at</strong>e constant<br />

Mass <strong>of</strong> char in bed <strong>at</strong> time t (kg)<br />

Initial mass <strong>of</strong> b<strong>at</strong>ch (kg)<br />

Mass <strong>of</strong> single char particle (kg)<br />

Function <strong>of</strong> particle size - equ<strong>at</strong>ion 25)<br />

Pressure (a Em)<br />

Reaction r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> single particle (kg/s)<br />

Gas constant<br />

Burnaway time (S)<br />

Temper <strong>at</strong> ure (0<br />

Bed temper<strong>at</strong>ure (0<br />

Reference temper<strong>at</strong>ure - equ<strong>at</strong>ion 30) (K)<br />

Particle surface temper<strong>at</strong>ure (K)<br />

Minimum f luidising velocity (4s)<br />

Superficial fluidising velocity (m/s)<br />

Weight fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>coal</strong> (kg)<br />

Particle diameter (mm)<br />

Initial weighted mean particle size (mm)<br />

Particle diameter (mm)<br />

Particle diameter (m)<br />

Dimensionless particle diameter (= x/xi)<br />

Particle diameter (mm)<br />

Dimensionless particle diameter (= yo/;;)<br />

Particle diameter (lower limit <strong>of</strong> integr<strong>at</strong>ion) mm<br />

Dimensionless particle diameter (= z/xi)<br />

303<br />

J


Greek Symbols<br />

P Char density<br />

e<br />

Size distribution function equ<strong>at</strong>ion 7)<br />

J, Size distribution function equ<strong>at</strong>ion 8)<br />

r Gamma function<br />

References<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

9.<br />

LO.<br />

11.<br />

Gibson, J. and Highley, J., J. Inst. E., 1979, 52, 51.<br />

Sar<strong>of</strong>im, A.F. and Beer, J.H. Combustion Inst. Conf. No. 17, 1978, 189.<br />

Field, M.A. Gill, D.W., Morgan, B.B. and Hawksley, P.G.W., Combustion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pulverised Coal, 1967, BCURA.<br />

Basu, P., Fuel, 1977, 56, 390.<br />

Y<strong>at</strong>es, J.R. Witkowski, A.R. and Harrison, D., Trans. I. Chem. E.<br />

1980, 2, 69.<br />

Garbett, E.S. and Hedley, A.B. Power Ind. Research, 1981, 1, 91.<br />

Avedesian, M.M. and Davidson, J.F., Trans. I. Chem. E.<br />

Garbett, E.S. and Hedley, A.B., Inst. Energy Symp. Series No. 4, 1980,<br />

paper IV-6.<br />

Leesley, M.E. and Siddall, R.G., J. Inst. F., 1972, 5, 169.<br />

Marsden, C., Ph.D. Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, 1964.<br />

Beer, J.M., Ph.D. Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, 1959.<br />

304<br />

I<br />

/


UNBURNT FRACTION UNBURNT FRACTION m/mi<br />

0 d 0 d<br />

0 VI 0 0 ffl 0<br />

It II II<br />

w<br />

FRACTION RATIO mc.0 I mD<br />

ffl<br />

0 0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

I<br />

m<br />

z<br />

VI<br />

5<br />

r z<br />

m<br />

:?<br />

ocn<br />

.b<br />

I<br />

m<br />

-4<br />

m<br />

a <<br />

s-<br />

0<br />

305<br />

d<br />

8<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

I<br />

m<br />

z<br />

L!<br />

0<br />

z<br />

r-<br />

m<br />

UI 0<br />

VI0 m . 0<br />

om<br />

><br />

I<br />

m<br />

-4<br />

m<br />

a<br />

s N -<br />

0<br />

UNBURNT FRACTION mlmi<br />

0 d<br />

n<br />

3


1.0<br />

. E<br />

E<br />

z<br />

0<br />

c<br />

c<br />

t<br />

LI<br />

3<br />

m<br />

z<br />

3<br />

0<br />

z<br />

0 1.0<br />

I- <<br />

[L<br />

I-<br />

z o<br />

w v<br />

g><br />

00<br />

V<br />

-1<br />

a<br />

z<br />

0<br />

I-<br />

V<br />

a<br />

L L O<br />

a<br />

2 00 400 600<br />

BURNAWAY TIME (5)<br />

Fig. 5. (tap). Burndwy riife <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> b;ifcli for <strong>the</strong><br />

rhree distributions.<br />

306<br />

1<br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!