Journal of the Federated Malay States museums - Sabrizain.org
Journal of the Federated Malay States museums - Sabrizain.org
Journal of the Federated Malay States museums - Sabrizain.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
176 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> F.M.S. Museums. [Vol. VII,<br />
It would seem to be a fact, however, that <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong><br />
sou<strong>the</strong>rn birds are dull, <strong>the</strong>rein conforming with <strong>the</strong> diagnosis<br />
<strong>of</strong> M. a. olivaceum (Strickl.) while <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> those from<br />
<strong>the</strong> north are bright, agreeing with T. abbotti abbotti (Blyth).<br />
This is not, however, universally true in <strong>the</strong> present series, as<br />
<strong>the</strong> pair from Langkawi, one from Terutau and one from P.<br />
Lontar,<strong>the</strong> most nor<strong>the</strong>rly locality visited, are as dull as any from<br />
Kuala Lumpur and o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> Selangor. The remainder,<br />
and also specimens collected in 1915 in Langkawi are brighter<br />
birds, having <strong>the</strong> undertail coverts rich buffy rufous, <strong>the</strong> rufous<br />
buff <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flanks carried up high on <strong>the</strong> sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chest.<br />
Birds from Trang vary and ones from Perlis are brighter than<br />
Selangor and P.ihang skins. We have a topotype <strong>of</strong> M. a.<br />
olivaceum from Malacca, but it is a native skin so old and<br />
deteriorated that no reliable comparison can be made with it.<br />
None <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specimens are quite so bright as those obtained<br />
by Mr. Kloss on <strong>the</strong> coasts and islands <strong>of</strong> SE. Siam and listed<br />
by me in <strong>the</strong> Ibis for 1915.<br />
Gyldenstolpe (he. cit.) is in error in stating that <strong>the</strong>se<br />
specimens were referred to T. a. olivaceum, though a reference is<br />
given to Hartert's discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> question under that heading.<br />
Pending <strong>the</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> a large series from topotypical<br />
localities I have nut placed <strong>the</strong>se birds under any subspecific<br />
name. I have little doubt however that if M. a olivaceum is<br />
shown to have any real existence, which for <strong>the</strong> present must<br />
remain an open question, we shall have to call in <strong>the</strong> aid <strong>of</strong> a<br />
quadrinomial or even quinqenomial system, as is already<br />
used in some cases by Hartert, Stresemann and Parrott.<br />
If this comes into use at all extensively it becomes an open<br />
question whe<strong>the</strong>r a return to a bald binomial system is not,<br />
after all, <strong>the</strong> simplest and most convenient plan.<br />
go. MlXOKNIS RUBKICAPILLA RUBKICAPILLA, «/" subsp HOV.<br />
Mixornis gularis, Sharpe, torn. cit. p. 576; Robinson and<br />
Kloss, p. 62 : Robinson antea, vol. v, p. 106 uo.15); Gyldenstolpe,<br />
p. 60.<br />
p. T4