25.04.2013 Views

storm - Hrvatski memorijalno-dokumentacijski centar Domovinskog ...

storm - Hrvatski memorijalno-dokumentacijski centar Domovinskog ...

storm - Hrvatski memorijalno-dokumentacijski centar Domovinskog ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

General Staff had traditionally counted on the Bosnian Serb and Yugoslav armies to act<br />

as their strategic reserve, and during Storm these reserves were not available. Th e Army<br />

of Republika Srpska (VRS) was still more than willing to fulfi ll this role, but the VRS<br />

General Staff itself was short of reserve formations it needed to contend with ARBiH<br />

attacks across Bosnia. Th e battlefi eld situation in Bosnia made it impossible for the<br />

Bosnian Serbs to contribute anything more than a few counterattacks around Grahovo<br />

and Bihać (Balkan Battlegrounds, Chapter 89, p. 376).<br />

An overview of the war in Bosnia shows that such a conclusion is justifi ed. According<br />

to the CIA analysis, on instructions of the military leadership of Republika Srpska of 8<br />

March 1995 the Army of Republika Srpska (VRS) planned a number of off ensive actions<br />

(“Sarajevo ‘95”, “Spreča ‘95”, Sadejstvo ‘95”, “Lukavac ‘95”, “Zvijezda ‘95”), intended to<br />

seize a large portion of ARBiH-held territory north of Tuzla, the areas of Mounts Igman<br />

and Bjelašnica, expand the Posavina corridor and remove the threat facing Doboj,<br />

strangle the enclaves of Žepa and Srebrenica and capture them if their UN protectors<br />

withdrew, and reduce the enclave of Goražde to a 3 km radius around the town itself.<br />

Plans had to include two additional operations to cut routes through the Neretva valley<br />

to the sea near Dubrovnik (Balkan Battlegrounds, Chapter 73, pp. 289-290). Th ese very<br />

ambitious plans for the VRS show that that the Serbs wanted to use military actions<br />

in order to force the Muslim and Croatian leadership, and thereby the international<br />

community as well, to acknowledge the facts on the ground, which were abundantly to<br />

the favour of the “Serbian cause”.<br />

However, these plans were largely beyond the momentary capacity of the VRS because<br />

the changes in the balance of forces between the ARBiH and VRS, which fi rst became<br />

apparent in 1994, were very obvious by 1995 (Balkan Battlegrounds, Chapter 78, pp. 300-<br />

303). Th us, instead of capturing territory the VRS had to defend itself from the reorganized<br />

Army of BiH. 5 Moreover, the VRS also had to defend itself from the attack of Croatian<br />

5 Th us, on 20 March 1995 the ARBiH launched spring off ensives, the targets being the Serbian-held radio<br />

transmitters atop Mount Vlašić near Travnik (Operation «Domet») and Stolice on Mount Majevica east of<br />

Tuzla. Th ere was also fi erce fi ghting on Mount Treskavica. Th e ARBiH was very successful in the fi rst attack,<br />

while in the second it suff ered a major defeat. However, in spite of its substantial losses in both operations,<br />

UN military observers reported obvious improvements in terms of equipment, planning, organization and<br />

execution of attacks; Bosnian soldiers now had adequate small arms and ammunition, fl ak jackets, helmets<br />

and radios. Similarly, the failure of the Serbian operation «Sadejstvo ‘95» in April 1995, intended to expand<br />

the corridor at Boderište 8 km south of Brčko, defended by ARBiH forces and the Croatian Defence Council<br />

(HVO) 108th brigade shows that the VRS - in spite of its superiority in armour, artillery and other heavy<br />

weapons - was unable to break through ARBiH defences (Balkan Battlegrounds, Chapter 78, pp. 300-303).<br />

Of course, the VRS also had to prepare for defence from the long announced ARBiH off ensive intended to<br />

relieve Sarajevo, which started in mid-June 1995; although it failed and even if ARBiH had extremely high<br />

losses, the off ensive tied down considerable VRS forces which could not be committed elsewhere. Th e VRS<br />

also suff ered considerable losses (Chapter 80, pp. 307-314). Aft er January 1995 the fi ghting was particularly<br />

intensive in the Bihać enclave where the ARBiH 5th Corps assisted by the HVO 101st regiment and logistic<br />

support from Croatia put up a tough and active defence against the superior forces of Bosnian and Croatian<br />

Serbs, and special force units from Serbia. Th is is supported by the operations «Una ‘95» and «Zora ‘95» of<br />

the ARBiH 5th Corps in May 1995, and operations «Trokut 1» in June 1995 (Balkan Battlegrounds, Chapters<br />

74, 75, 79).<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!