liquefaction pathways of bituminous subbituminous coals andtheir
liquefaction pathways of bituminous subbituminous coals andtheir liquefaction pathways of bituminous subbituminous coals andtheir
In this study we have adopted N,N'-dimethylformamide(DMD as the reference solvent. The reason is that it has a powerful ability to solve many kinds of chemicals even inorganic compounds and it is also easy to purified. Table 2 summerizes the tyipical example of Coal Affinity ParametedKQ-value) determined for various chemicals, In these data it is particulary interesting that the f3naphthol(mp 122-123OC), nitrobenzene and maleic anhydride(mp 54-56OC) have higher %-values than pyridine. These compounds have long been assumed to have reasonably good affinity to coal, but their relative abilities were never compared. Figure 5 shows the relation between Coal Affinity Parameter(K value) and the electoron donor numberfDN). Surprizingly, a good correlation was %served towards wide range of organic compounds, particularly, a solid(crysta1) compound such as ethylenecarbonate(mp.350C) and a sterically hindered compound such as hexamethylphosphoramide(HMPA) in which coal used to give very small degree of 9 swelling, probably because of the steric hindrance. As previously discussed there seems to be reasonable relationship between coal affinity and enectron donor numbedDN), and now we can see a similar relation between the Coal Affinity Parameter(Kpa1Ue) and DN. Although this methodorogy proposed may not be a perfect one to evaluate the affinity to coal. but as far as the results shown in this Figure and Table 2, we are very much encouraged to use the KQ-value for the study on the chemical trasformations of coal. It will be also interesting to examine the dependency of %-value on the coal rank or the nature of the reference solvent , which are now underway in our laboratory. AKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported by the grant from the Japanes Ministry of Education(Kagaku Kenkyuhi Hojokin, Juhten Ryouiki Kenkyu) during 1989-1992. REFERENCES (1) T. Aida. K. Fuku . M. Fujii, M. Yoshihara, T. Maeshima, T. G. Squires, Energy & Fuels, 5, 79(1991) (2) T. Aida. Y. Shimoura, N. Yamawaki. M. Fujii, T.G. Squires, M. Yoshihara. T. Maeshima, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. SOC., Div. Fuel Chem., 33, %8(19&3) (3) T. Aida, T.G. Squires, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem.. 30,95( 1985) (4) J. Szeliga, A. Marzec, Fuel, 62, 1229(1983) 522
. . % . . 9 'HF 0 0 0 *. . 0 . . 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Elsctmn Donor NumbcdDN) Figure I Camlation between @value and Elcctmn Dom NumbedDN) (Illinois No. 6 Coal: 60100merh: at 2Bc) Table I Solvent Swelling of Illinois No. 6 Coal. in Butylamines at 20.0 f 0.5 OC amine vwb @ ?mdCP CSA' n-butylamine isobutylamine 1.0 11.9 2.56 2.57 1.54 32.1 32.8 Yec-butylamine fert-butylamine 5.4 599 2.41 1.96, 1.37 1.48 33.2 34.1 n100-200 US mesh. bV,, = Vn.h/V- V..a, = 3.1 x 10-1 min-'. CMeasured after 10 days' swelling. dDeterminated by means of Ubbelohde viscometer at 20.00 i 0.02 'C. 'Swelling is still continuing. * Cross-sectional Areal A' ) 523 4: I I I e. /' I I I' 7 I bi ; I 1.5
- Page 1 and 2: LIQUEFACTION PATHWAYS OF BITUMINOUS
- Page 3 and 4: the conversion of A+P and O+G with
- Page 5 and 6: Asphaltcncs PrCasphaltenCS Cwr%, da
- Page 7 and 8: NEW DIRECTIONS TO PRECONVERSION PRO
- Page 9 and 10: ecause of incorporation of the coal
- Page 11 and 12: should be considered more. The step
- Page 13 and 14: 17 18 Run no. 0 cys I ToS-CyS TS-To
- Page 15 and 16: INTRODUCTION Effects of Thermal and
- Page 17 and 18: apid decline in modulus. The loss m
- Page 19 and 20: -0.01- . 04 5 -0.03- E 6 -0.0s- c)
- Page 21 and 22: Assessment of Small Particle Iron O
- Page 23 and 24: yields are calculated by subtractin
- Page 25 and 26: conversion is greater than the corr
- Page 27 and 28: Table 3. Effect of Superfine Iron O
- Page 29 and 30: EFFECT OF A CATALYST ON THE DISSOLU
- Page 31 and 32: inherent volatility of Mo(CO), perm
- Page 33 and 34: Analysis of the quantity and compos
- Page 35 and 36: $ EO .- 0 m L 0 c 0 0 > 40 300 350
- Page 37 and 38: 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.0
- Page 39 and 40: of these studies indicate that cont
- Page 41 and 42: Different levels of adsorption occu
- Page 43 and 44: Nominal 2 Table 1. Concentration of
- Page 45 and 46: - iF m 1.6 1.4 1.2 - - - 1- 0 0.8 -
- Page 47: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Swelling of
- Page 51 and 52: 1.50 KQ 1.00 0.50 I / ' 02 525 I 1
- Page 53 and 54: hydrogen atoms. The hydrogen atoms
- Page 55 and 56: D to generate more D atoms. It is r
- Page 57 and 58: 12. a. Poutsma, M. L.; Dyer, C. W.
- Page 59 and 60: Figure 3. Minimum Steps to Explin D
- Page 61 and 62: Apoaratus and Procedure Microflow R
- Page 63 and 64: Model ComDound Test Figure 5 shows
- Page 65 and 66: Figure 1. High resolution gas chrom
- Page 67 and 68: Figure 5. Product distribution for
- Page 69 and 70: THQ at somewhat higher temperatures
- Page 71 and 72: areas of the particles and the SEM
- Page 73 and 74: Experimental Catalyst Precursors an
- Page 75 and 76: impregnating solvent. Table 3 shows
- Page 77 and 78: of MoCo-TC2 at the level of 0.5 wt%
- Page 79 and 80: Table 4. Effect of Temperature Prog
- Page 81 and 82: In the past, chemical treatments in
- Page 83 and 84: The effect of Corn20 preaatment on
- Page 85 and 86: Reaction Time Figure 1 - Schematic
- Page 87 and 88: DISSOLUTION OF THE ARGONNE PREMIUM
- Page 89 and 90: A much more def~tive trend is seen
- Page 91 and 92: EFFECT OF CHLOROBENZENE TREATMENT O
- Page 93 and 94: same conditions and an extraction t
- Page 95 and 96: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors thank t
- Page 97 and 98: THE STRUCTURAL &=RATION OF HUMINlTE
In this study we have adopted N,N'-dimethylformamide(DMD as the reference<br />
solvent. The reason is that it has a powerful ability to solve many kinds <strong>of</strong> chemicals<br />
even inorganic compounds and it is also easy to purified.<br />
Table 2 summerizes the tyipical example <strong>of</strong> Coal Affinity ParametedKQ-value)<br />
determined for various chemicals, In these data it is particulary interesting that the f3naphthol(mp<br />
122-123OC), nitrobenzene and maleic anhydride(mp 54-56OC) have higher<br />
%-values than pyridine. These compounds have long been assumed to have reasonably<br />
good affinity to coal, but their relative abilities were never compared.<br />
Figure 5 shows the relation between Coal Affinity Parameter(K value) and the<br />
electoron donor numberfDN). Surprizingly, a good correlation was %served towards<br />
wide range <strong>of</strong> organic compounds, particularly, a solid(crysta1) compound such as<br />
ethylenecarbonate(mp.350C) and a sterically hindered compound such as<br />
hexamethylphosphoramide(HMPA) in which coal used to give very small degree <strong>of</strong> 9<br />
swelling, probably because <strong>of</strong> the steric hindrance. As previously discussed there seems<br />
to be reasonable relationship between coal affinity and enectron donor numbedDN), and<br />
now we can see a similar relation between the Coal Affinity Parameter(Kpa1Ue) and<br />
DN. Although this methodorogy proposed may not be a perfect one to evaluate the<br />
affinity to coal. but as far as the results shown in this Figure and Table 2, we are very<br />
much encouraged to use the KQ-value for the study on the chemical trasformations <strong>of</strong><br />
coal.<br />
It will be also interesting to examine the dependency <strong>of</strong> %-value on the coal rank or<br />
the nature <strong>of</strong> the reference solvent , which are now underway in our laboratory.<br />
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
This research was supported by the grant from the Japanes Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Education(Kagaku Kenkyuhi Hojokin, Juhten Ryouiki Kenkyu) during 1989-1992.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
(1) T. Aida. K. Fuku . M. Fujii, M. Yoshihara, T. Maeshima, T. G. Squires,<br />
Energy & Fuels, 5, 79(1991)<br />
(2) T. Aida. Y. Shimoura, N. Yamawaki. M. Fujii, T.G. Squires, M. Yoshihara.<br />
T. Maeshima, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. SOC., Div. Fuel Chem., 33, %8(19&3)<br />
(3) T. Aida, T.G. Squires, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem..<br />
30,95( 1985)<br />
(4) J. Szeliga, A. Marzec, Fuel, 62, 1229(1983)<br />
522