liquefaction pathways of bituminous subbituminous coals andtheir
liquefaction pathways of bituminous subbituminous coals andtheir liquefaction pathways of bituminous subbituminous coals andtheir
EPRI AP-5221, Final Report, June 1987, pp 3-7. 18. Djega-Mariadassou, G., Besson, M., Brodzki, D., Charcosset, H., HUU, T. V. and Varloud, J., Fuel Processing Tech, 1986, 12, 143-145. 19. Das Gupta, R., Mitra, J. R., Dutta, B. K., Sharma, U. N., Sinha, A. K. and Mukherjee, D. K., Fuel Proc Tech, 1991, 27, 35. Table 1. Liquefaction of Black Thunder Coal with Wilsonville oils' Distillateb Distillate Compositeb Composite Added Fe, wt$ coal % Yield, maf coal none 1.1 none 1.1 Gases 7.3 7.3 6.9 6.9 Oils 24.9 35.8 48.5 53.8 PA+A 54.5 51.9 52.2 45.3 IOM 13.3 5.0 -7.6 -6.0 THF Conv, wt% 86.7 95.0 107.6 106.0 Run No. 281-1 ' 169-2 139-1/ 167-1 142-21 189-1 a. 415' C, 1 hour, 1000 psig H2 cold, 5.4 grams recyc e oil, 3. grams coal, 2.4 mole sulfur/mole iron. b. No DMDS added Table 2. Liquefaction of Black Thunder Coal in Wilsonville Recycle Oil' No Catalyst Added 1.1 wt% Fe Added 15 min 30 min 60 min 15 min 30 min 60 min Yields, wt % HC Gases 0.5 1.1 1.9 1.1 1.6 2.1 co+coz 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.4 4.8 4.8 oils 21.3 36.4 48.5 20.8 36.0 53.8 PA+A 57.6 56.2 52.2 58.1 59.3 45.3 IOM 16.1 1.3 -7.6 15.6 -1.7 -6.0 Coal Conv, wt % 83.9 98.7 107.6 84.4 101.7 106.0 Run Number 148-2 167-2 139-1/ 176-1 169-1 189-1/ 167-1 142-2 a. 415O C, 1000 psig H, cold, 5.4 grams recycle oil, 3.0 grams coal, 2.4 mole sulfur/mole Fe 500
Table 3. Effect of Superfine Iron OxiUe on Liquefaction' Thermal SFIO A Iron, wt % coal None 2.5 Yields, wt% maf coal HC Gases co+c02 Oils PA+A 1.9 5.0 48.5 52.2 2.8 0.9 4.7 -0.3 59.1 10.6 43.3 -8.9 IOM -7.6 -9.9 -2.3 THF Conversion 107.6 109.9 2.3 Run Number 139-1/167-1 174-2/ 190-1/190-3 a. 415'C, 1 hour, 1000 psig hydrogen cold, 5.4 grams recycle oil, 3.0 grams coal, 2.0 mole sulfur/mole iron. Table 4. Dependent Variables EvaluateU Effect nnits THF Conv THF conversion, wt% maf coal m H, H2 consumption, mg/g maf coal HC Gas Hydrocarbon gas yield, wt% maf coal CO+C02 CO and C02 gas yield, wt% ma€ coal TGas Total gas yield, wt% maf coal Oils wt% maf coal PA+A wt% maf coal 501 R BcruareU 0.926 0.973 0.969 0.944 0.961 0.880 0.922
- Page 1 and 2: LIQUEFACTION PATHWAYS OF BITUMINOUS
- Page 3 and 4: the conversion of A+P and O+G with
- Page 5 and 6: Asphaltcncs PrCasphaltenCS Cwr%, da
- Page 7 and 8: NEW DIRECTIONS TO PRECONVERSION PRO
- Page 9 and 10: ecause of incorporation of the coal
- Page 11 and 12: should be considered more. The step
- Page 13 and 14: 17 18 Run no. 0 cys I ToS-CyS TS-To
- Page 15 and 16: INTRODUCTION Effects of Thermal and
- Page 17 and 18: apid decline in modulus. The loss m
- Page 19 and 20: -0.01- . 04 5 -0.03- E 6 -0.0s- c)
- Page 21 and 22: Assessment of Small Particle Iron O
- Page 23 and 24: yields are calculated by subtractin
- Page 25: conversion is greater than the corr
- Page 29 and 30: EFFECT OF A CATALYST ON THE DISSOLU
- Page 31 and 32: inherent volatility of Mo(CO), perm
- Page 33 and 34: Analysis of the quantity and compos
- Page 35 and 36: $ EO .- 0 m L 0 c 0 0 > 40 300 350
- Page 37 and 38: 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.0
- Page 39 and 40: of these studies indicate that cont
- Page 41 and 42: Different levels of adsorption occu
- Page 43 and 44: Nominal 2 Table 1. Concentration of
- Page 45 and 46: - iF m 1.6 1.4 1.2 - - - 1- 0 0.8 -
- Page 47 and 48: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Swelling of
- Page 49 and 50: . . % . . 9 'HF 0 0 0 *. . 0 . . 0
- Page 51 and 52: 1.50 KQ 1.00 0.50 I / ' 02 525 I 1
- Page 53 and 54: hydrogen atoms. The hydrogen atoms
- Page 55 and 56: D to generate more D atoms. It is r
- Page 57 and 58: 12. a. Poutsma, M. L.; Dyer, C. W.
- Page 59 and 60: Figure 3. Minimum Steps to Explin D
- Page 61 and 62: Apoaratus and Procedure Microflow R
- Page 63 and 64: Model ComDound Test Figure 5 shows
- Page 65 and 66: Figure 1. High resolution gas chrom
- Page 67 and 68: Figure 5. Product distribution for
- Page 69 and 70: THQ at somewhat higher temperatures
- Page 71 and 72: areas of the particles and the SEM
- Page 73 and 74: Experimental Catalyst Precursors an
- Page 75 and 76: impregnating solvent. Table 3 shows
EPRI AP-5221, Final Report, June 1987, pp 3-7.<br />
18. Djega-Mariadassou, G., Besson, M., Brodzki, D., Charcosset,<br />
H., HUU, T. V. and Varloud, J., Fuel Processing Tech, 1986, 12,<br />
143-145.<br />
19. Das Gupta, R., Mitra, J. R., Dutta, B. K., Sharma, U. N.,<br />
Sinha, A. K. and Mukherjee, D. K., Fuel Proc Tech, 1991, 27, 35.<br />
Table 1. Liquefaction <strong>of</strong> Black Thunder Coal with Wilsonville<br />
oils'<br />
Distillateb Distillate Compositeb Composite<br />
Added Fe, wt$<br />
coal<br />
% Yield, maf<br />
coal<br />
none 1.1 none<br />
1.1<br />
Gases 7.3 7.3 6.9<br />
6.9<br />
Oils 24.9 35.8 48.5 53.8<br />
PA+A 54.5 51.9 52.2 45.3<br />
IOM 13.3 5.0 -7.6<br />
-6.0<br />
THF Conv, wt% 86.7 95.0 107.6 106.0<br />
Run No. 281-1 ' 169-2 139-1/<br />
167-1<br />
142-21<br />
189-1<br />
a. 415' C, 1 hour, 1000 psig H2 cold, 5.4 grams recyc e oil, 3.<br />
grams coal, 2.4 mole sulfur/mole iron.<br />
b. No DMDS added<br />
Table 2. Liquefaction <strong>of</strong> Black Thunder Coal in Wilsonville Recycle<br />
Oil'<br />
No Catalyst Added 1.1 wt% Fe Added<br />
15 min 30 min 60 min 15 min 30 min 60 min<br />
Yields, wt %<br />
HC Gases<br />
0.5 1.1 1.9 1.1 1.6 2.1<br />
co+coz<br />
4.5 5.0 5.0 4.4 4.8 4.8<br />
oils<br />
21.3 36.4 48.5 20.8 36.0 53.8<br />
PA+A<br />
57.6 56.2 52.2 58.1 59.3 45.3<br />
IOM<br />
16.1 1.3 -7.6 15.6 -1.7 -6.0<br />
Coal Conv, wt % 83.9 98.7 107.6 84.4 101.7 106.0<br />
Run Number<br />
148-2 167-2 139-1/ 176-1 169-1 189-1/<br />
167-1<br />
142-2<br />
a. 415O C, 1000 psig H, cold, 5.4 grams recycle oil, 3.0 grams coal,<br />
2.4 mole sulfur/mole Fe<br />
500