thesis
thesis
thesis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
such apparently different classes of property could arise out of a single, more basic one and<br />
what the latter’s nature could be.<br />
Naturalism and Non-materialism?<br />
But does naturalism not entail materialism? What right do naturalists have to start in-<br />
voking thinking, feeling entities while claiming they remain within the scientific paradigm?<br />
J. P. Moreland, in a general article on the argument from consciousness (1998, 80) quotes<br />
David Armstrong (a materialist) as saying (1978, 72):<br />
I suppose that if the principles involved [in analysing the single all-embracing spatio-temporal<br />
system which is reality] were completely different from the current principles of physics, in<br />
particular if they involved appeal to mental entities, such as purposes, we might then count<br />
the analysis as a falsification of Naturalism.<br />
Armstrong is welcome to his own definitions but it seems somewhat fruitless to debate<br />
which theories do or do not deserve the particular title of ‘naturalism’. A better question to<br />
consider is as follows: How on earth could mental entities be incorporated into a world-view<br />
which is otherwise materialist and scientific?<br />
As many have noted, the quantum-mechanical view of matter leaves much room for<br />
precisely such a combination. Although any significant discussion is beyond the scope of<br />
this piece, some preliminary observations will be made. Several experiments in quantum<br />
mechanics have forced us to the conclusion that the world consists not of particles but of<br />
complex probability 13 waveforms which, under certain conditions, ‘collapse’ into particles of<br />
either definite position or momentum (but never both at the same time). And all we know<br />
for sure about the ‘collapse’ of these waveforms is that it has to take place prior to, in some<br />
13 Complex probability is expressed in the form x+yi where i is defined as the square root of -1. See<br />
Penrose (1989, 306–20) for a good introduction to how the state of a quantum system is represented as<br />
a Schrödinger equation, whose value at each point is a complex probability.<br />
44