25.04.2013 Views

thesis

thesis

thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

such apparently different classes of property could arise out of a single, more basic one and<br />

what the latter’s nature could be.<br />

Naturalism and Non-materialism?<br />

But does naturalism not entail materialism? What right do naturalists have to start in-<br />

voking thinking, feeling entities while claiming they remain within the scientific paradigm?<br />

J. P. Moreland, in a general article on the argument from consciousness (1998, 80) quotes<br />

David Armstrong (a materialist) as saying (1978, 72):<br />

I suppose that if the principles involved [in analysing the single all-embracing spatio-temporal<br />

system which is reality] were completely different from the current principles of physics, in<br />

particular if they involved appeal to mental entities, such as purposes, we might then count<br />

the analysis as a falsification of Naturalism.<br />

Armstrong is welcome to his own definitions but it seems somewhat fruitless to debate<br />

which theories do or do not deserve the particular title of ‘naturalism’. A better question to<br />

consider is as follows: How on earth could mental entities be incorporated into a world-view<br />

which is otherwise materialist and scientific?<br />

As many have noted, the quantum-mechanical view of matter leaves much room for<br />

precisely such a combination. Although any significant discussion is beyond the scope of<br />

this piece, some preliminary observations will be made. Several experiments in quantum<br />

mechanics have forced us to the conclusion that the world consists not of particles but of<br />

complex probability 13 waveforms which, under certain conditions, ‘collapse’ into particles of<br />

either definite position or momentum (but never both at the same time). And all we know<br />

for sure about the ‘collapse’ of these waveforms is that it has to take place prior to, in some<br />

13 Complex probability is expressed in the form x+yi where i is defined as the square root of -1. See<br />

Penrose (1989, 306–20) for a good introduction to how the state of a quantum system is represented as<br />

a Schrödinger equation, whose value at each point is a complex probability.<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!