thesis
thesis
thesis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
sciousness’) is not logically supervenient on functional cognition (‘awareness’). Nevertheless,<br />
he does think that awareness is naturally supervenient on consciousness (220):<br />
Where there is consciousness, there is awareness. My visual experience of a red book upon my<br />
table is accompanied by a functional perception of the book. Optical stimulation is processed<br />
and transformed, and my perceptual systems register that there is an object of such-and-such<br />
shape and colour on the table, with this information available in the control of behaviour.<br />
The principle of structural coherence takes this one step further, suggesting not only that<br />
the existence of consciousness depends on that of awareness, but that the structure of con-<br />
sciousness mirrors that of awareness (224–5):<br />
Similarities and differences between experiences correspond to similarities and differences<br />
represented in awareness; the geometry of experience corresponds to the geometry of aware-<br />
ness; and so on…<br />
Thus, the contents of our subjective consciousness will very closely mirror those of our<br />
functional awareness. This seems to be borne out by empirical observation and is essential to<br />
any sense of rationality – if our subjective experiences diverged from our thoughts’ func-<br />
tions, we would quickly lose all feeling of successfully interacting with the world.<br />
Organisational Invariance<br />
Chalmers produces a reductio argument against the claim that the existence and contents<br />
of conscious experience depend in any way on the material constituting our brains. He car-<br />
ries out several thought experiments to demonstrate that a silicon functional isomorph of a<br />
human brain would also produce exactly the same phenomenology. The reductio is as fol-<br />
lows: if silicon brains lacked phenomenology, a complete replacement of neurons in one<br />
person’s brain by silicon would result in ‘absent qualia’ (251–3), gradual replacement would<br />
result in ‘fading qualia’ (253–63) and the installation of a system to switch instantly between<br />
neural and silicon processing would allow for ‘dancing qualia’ (266–74).<br />
Each of these possibilities is found problematic and implausible, thus Chalmers is led to<br />
35