24.04.2013 Views

Download Soft Fetal Ultrasound Findings - Credit Valley Hospital

Download Soft Fetal Ultrasound Findings - Credit Valley Hospital

Download Soft Fetal Ultrasound Findings - Credit Valley Hospital

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOFT FETAL<br />

ULTRASOUND FINDINGS<br />

Compiled by the Genetics Team at The <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong><br />

Last updated February 2008


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 2<br />

This document refers to the ultrasound finding of a soft sign, as compared to a clear cut<br />

structural anomaly. There is very little information about outcomes when more than<br />

one soft finding is seen on a fetal ultrasound. The information herein refers to isolated<br />

soft findings, meaning the ultrasound is otherwise unremarkable.<br />

If the ultrasound is done at a gestation earlier than 18 weeks, a detailed fetal ultrasound<br />

around 18-19 weeks can be considered, since visualization of the fetus is better at later<br />

gestations, allowing for exclusion of other soft signs, and a better assessment of the<br />

original finding. However, in many of the soft ultrasound findings, the natural history is<br />

that the sign can disappear, but one cannot fully ignore the original finding.<br />

The impact of Maternal Serum Screening (MSS) or Integrated Prenatal Screening (IPS)<br />

in estimating the risk of a true fetal chromosome anomaly in the presence of a soft<br />

ultrasound finding is unknown. Only for a choroid plexus cyst has the literature begun<br />

to evaluate the contribution of MSS or IPS.<br />

It is important to remember that the risk of a significant fetal chromosome anomaly<br />

increases with maternal age. A woman is eligible for prenatal chromosome testing<br />

when she is 35 or greater at the time of delivery (32 or older if twins).<br />

Although likelihood risks have been estimated for some of the soft signs, it is important<br />

to note that in many of the references below, the women were from high risk categories,<br />

potentially inflating the risk estimates. Also, often the number of cases reported is<br />

small.<br />

General References:<br />

Shipp and Benacerraf (2002). Second trimester screening for chromosome<br />

abnormalities. Prenatal Diagnosis 22:296-307.<br />

Smith-Bindman R. et al (2001). Second-trimester ultrasound to detect fetuses with<br />

Down syndrome. JAMA 285:1044-1055.<br />

Van den Hof MC. et al. (2005). <strong>Fetal</strong> soft markers in obstetric ultrasound. JOGC<br />

27:592-612.<br />

2


CONTENTS<br />

FIRST TRIMESTER SOFT SIGNS<br />

1. Absent nasal bone<br />

2. Increased nuchal translucency<br />

SECOND TRIMESTER SOFT SIGNS<br />

1. Choroid plexus cyst<br />

2. Drooping choroids<br />

3. Mild ventriculomegaly<br />

4. Enlarged cistern magna<br />

5. Nasal bone hypoplasia<br />

6. Increased nuchal fold<br />

7. Echogenic cardiac focus<br />

8. Single umbilical artery<br />

9. Pyelectasis<br />

10.Echogenic bowel<br />

11.Short femur<br />

12.Short humerus<br />

<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 3<br />

3


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 4<br />

1. ABSENT NASAL BONE February 2008<br />

A small nose and midface hypoplasia are well-recognized clinical features of Down<br />

syndrome. Nasal bone ossification has been absent in a significant number of aborted<br />

fetuses with DS of varying gestations. This information provided credence to the idea of<br />

prenatal first trimester study of the nasal bone as an additional marker for DS.<br />

Required components for nasal bone imaging have been suggested (2) . This includes a<br />

mid-sagittal view of the fetus with the fetus occupying most of the image with clear fetal<br />

margins.<br />

Several studies have now been published suggesting the absence of the nasal bone in<br />

the first trimester is associated with DS. The majority of studies emerge from Cicero et<br />

al (Nicolaides group in the UK) (1) . Six important pieces of information have emerged:<br />

• Nasal bone more likely to be absent at earlier gestations. In euploid fetuses with<br />

CRL between 45 and 54 mm, the nasal bone was absent in 4.7% cases. At CRL<br />

between 75 and 84 mm, the nasal bone was absent in only 1% of cases. Nasal<br />

bone assessment should be limited to first trimester fetuses with CRL> 45 mm.<br />

• Data in the studies are from a high-risk pregnancy group. Low risk population yet<br />

to be studied. Prefumo et al (3) suggest nasal bone hypoplasia performs poorly as<br />

a marker for DS in an unselected population. This raises the question of its use<br />

as a secondary marker rather than a primary marker.<br />

• Examining a high-risk group opting for CVS, the nasal bone was absent in 43/59<br />

(73%) trisomy 21 fetuses and only 3/603 (0.5%) euploid fetuses. If this<br />

ultrasound sign is combined with NT and biochemistry markers it is predicted the<br />

detection of DS would increase to 93% with the same false positive rate of 5%.<br />

• The same investigators found that absence of the nasal bone is also associated<br />

with trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and monosomy X.<br />

• There appears to be an association between absent nasal bone, fetal crownrump<br />

length, and nuchal translucency. In aneuploid pregnancies, nasal bone<br />

absence occurs more frequently with increasing NT. When NT was at the 95 th<br />

percentile or less the likelihood of absent nasal bone was greatest. The<br />

likelihood decreased as the NT increased.<br />

• There is a relationship between ethnicity and nasal bone development.<br />

Further evaluation of nasal bone assessment performance in a low risk population must<br />

be determined and sufficient adequately trained centres with appropriate educational<br />

and credentialing procedures must be available before this can be used as part of<br />

provincial screening in Ontario. However, use of this ultrasound marker as an<br />

independent determinant of fetal chromosome testing cannot be ignored in first<br />

trimester fetuses with CRL>45 mm.<br />

4


References:<br />

<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 5<br />

1. Cicero S et al. (2006) Nasal bone in first-trimester screening for trisomy 21. Am J<br />

Obstet Gynecol 195:109-114<br />

2. Rosen T et al. (2007) First-trimester ultrasound assessment of the nasal bone to<br />

screen for aneuploidy. Obstet and Gynecol. 110:2(1)399-404<br />

3. Prefumo F et al. (2006) First-trimester nuchal translucency, nasal bones, and<br />

trisomy 21 in selected and unselected populations. Am J Obstet Gynecol<br />

194:828-833<br />

5


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 6<br />

2. INCREASED FETAL NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY 11-14 weeks February 2008<br />

Nuchal translucency (NT) is the sonographic appearance of a subcutaneous collection<br />

of fluid behind the fetal neck. The 95th percentile measurement is 3.0 mm (which<br />

advances slightly with gestational age), and 99 th percentile measurement is constant at<br />

3.5 mm. NOTE: reliability of the measurement is operator dependent. Typically, this<br />

measurement is done as part of Integrated Prenatal Screening (IPS) or First Trimester<br />

Screening (FTS). Screening using only the NT is to be discouraged. However, if the<br />

measurement is significantly increased, it warrants offering counselling.<br />

Associations:<br />

An increased NT per se does not constitute a fetal abnormality.<br />

The larger the NT measurement, the greater is the risk of an adverse outcome.<br />

• Chromosome anomalies (50% trisomy 21, 25 % trisomy 13/18, 10% Turner<br />

syndrome, 10% other)<br />

• congenital heart disease (>99 th centile -> overall likelihood ratio of 22.5 X population<br />

risk, with 1% of screened population > 99 th centile, somewhat correlates with the<br />

size of the NT<br />

• single gene conditions, (with or without mental handicap)<br />

• other anatomic anomalies –Likelihood ratio correlates with size of NT for<br />

lethal/severe anomalies,<br />

• fetal demise – Likelihood ratio = 5 X but does not correlate with the size of the NT<br />

With normal chromosomes, a normal 19 week ultrasound and echocardiogram, and with<br />

regression of the NT, there is up to a 95% chance of normal pregnancy outcome,<br />

without major malformations.<br />

Counselling and Management:<br />

• Chromosome testing is offered, by CVS if gestation allows, or by amniocentesis. If<br />

IPS has been started, the patient can finish the screen, but if the NT is >4 mm, the<br />

result will be screen positive. A screen negative result does not rule out fetal trisomy<br />

18 or 21. Chromosome testing includes the offer of microarray analysis if G-banded<br />

analysis is normal.<br />

• When gestation allows, the patient can consider an ultrasound at 15 weeks, to<br />

assess viability and progression/regression of the finding, before having invasive<br />

fetal chromosome testing by amniocentesis.<br />

• <strong>Ultrasound</strong> at 19– 20 weeks gestation to look for fetal structural anomalies<br />

• Echocardiogram of the heart and great vessels at 19-20 weeks if NT>3.5 mm. If<br />

below 99 th centile, careful ultrasound, with examination of the great vessels and<br />

heart is appropriate.<br />

• Newborn physical examination by a clinician aware of the prenatal ultrasound<br />

finding.<br />

6


References:<br />

<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 7<br />

Atzel A et al., (2005). Relationship between nuchal translucency thickness and<br />

prevalence of major cardiac defects in fetuses with normal karyotype. <strong>Ultrasound</strong><br />

Obstet Gynecol. 26:154-157.<br />

Bilardo CM. et al., (2007). Increased nuchal translucency thickness and normal<br />

karyotype: time for parental reassurance. <strong>Ultrasound</strong> in Obstet Gynecol 30:11-18.<br />

Haddow JE et al. (1998). Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: where are we and<br />

where next? Lancet 352:336-337.<br />

Hyett J et al. (1999). Using fetal nuchal translucency to screen for major congenital<br />

cardiac defects at 10-14 weeks of gestation: population based cohort study. BMJ<br />

318:81-85. (See also the accompanying editorial on page 70-71)<br />

Muller MA et al. (2004). Disappearance of enlarged nuchal translucency before 14<br />

weeks gestation: relationship with chromosomal abnormalities and pregnancy outcome.<br />

<strong>Ultrasound</strong> in Obstetrics and Gynecology 24(2):169-174<br />

Nicolaides et al (2002). Increased fetal nuchal translucency at 11-14 weeks. Prenatal<br />

Diagnosis 22:308-315<br />

Snijders RJM et al., (1998). UK multicentre project on assessement of risk of trisomy 21<br />

by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gestation.<br />

Souka AP et al., (2005). Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype. Am J<br />

Obstet Gynecol 192:1005-1021.<br />

Westin M et al., (2007) by how much does increased nuchal translucency increase the<br />

risk of adverse pregnancyoutcome in chromosomally normal fetuses? A study of 16260<br />

fetuses derived from an unselected pregnant population. <strong>Ultrasound</strong> Obstet Gynecol<br />

29:150-158.<br />

7


SECOND TRIMESTER SOFT SIGNS<br />

<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 8<br />

1. Choroid Plexus Cyst (CPC) February 2008<br />

As the choroid plexus develops, the covering epithelium changes and choroidal villi are<br />

formed. The spaces between these projections (villi) may be enlarged by fluid or debris<br />

to create choroid plexus cysts.<br />

Natural History:<br />

• 1-4% of all pregnancies:<br />

• almost all disappear by 28 weeks gestation<br />

• no long term clinical consequences for cerebral development<br />

• size, location and number do not appear to influence outcome<br />

Association:<br />

• increased risk of trisomy 18, which becomes significant only for those > 35 at<br />

delivery<br />

• weakly associated with trisomy 21 (Down syndrome)<br />

Counselling:<br />

a) Maternal age , prenatal screen not done – amniocentesis is available based<br />

on age, amniocentesis should be considered, - if patient is not keen on<br />

amniocentesis and if gestation permits, MSS could be undertaken, for if it is screen<br />

negative, likely the risk of trisomy 18 is diminished.<br />

e) If there are any additional soft signs, referral for counselling and the offer of fetal<br />

chromosome is appropriate.<br />

References:<br />

Bird LM, et al. (2002) Choroid plexus cysts in the mid-tirmester fetus. Prenatal<br />

Diagnosis 22:792-7.<br />

Cheng PJ, et al. (2006) Association of fetal choroid plexus cysts with Trisomy 18 in a<br />

population previously screened by nuchal translucency thickness measurement. JSoc<br />

Gynecol Investig 13:280-4<br />

Gratton et al, (1996) Choroid plexus cysts and trisomy 18: risk modification based on<br />

maternal age and multiple marker screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1493-7.<br />

8


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 9<br />

Ouzounian JG, et al. (2007). Isolated choroid plexus cyst or echogenic cardiac focus on<br />

prenatal ultrasound: is genetic amniocentesis indicated? Am J Obstet Gynecol.<br />

196:595.e1-e3.<br />

2. DROOPING CHOROID (dangling choroid) February 2008<br />

The medial wall of the lateral ventricle appears to be separated from the choroid. The<br />

normal measurement should be less than 3 mm. The normal size of the lateral<br />

ventriclular atrial measurement is less than 10 mm.<br />

Natural History:<br />

Unknown – often resolves by the subsequent ultrasound.<br />

Associations:<br />

There are no clear associations with a recognized adverse clinical outcome. However,<br />

there is a small concern this might be the prelude to cerebral ventriculomegaly (which<br />

has a clear association with increased adverse outcomes).<br />

Counselling:<br />

• Monitor ventricular size and look for other anomalies with ultrasound at 18, 22-23<br />

weeks and 32-36 weeks. If ventriculomegaly (lateral ventricle atrial measurement of<br />

10 mm or more) is subsequently found, further counselling is warranted.<br />

• Amniocentesis - Since there is an association of mild cerebral ventriculomegaly with<br />

an increased risk of a chromosome anomaly, amniocentesis can be offered.<br />

Reference:<br />

Hertzberg, BS et al., (1994) Choroid Plexus-ventricular wall separation in fetuses with<br />

normal-sized cerebral ventricles at sonography: postnatal outcome, Am J Radiol<br />

163:405-10.<br />

9


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 10<br />

3. MILD CEREBRAL VENTRICULOMEGALY February 2008<br />

Mild ventriculomegaly is defined as an axial diameter of greater than 9.9 mm, measured<br />

across the atrium of the posterior or anterior horn of the lateral ventricles at any<br />

gestation. Sometimes, it is described as a separation of more than 3 mm of the choroid<br />

plexus from the medial wall of the lateral ventricle. Ventriculomegaly is distinguished<br />

from hydrocephalus where there is an atrial diameter of greater than 15 mm.<br />

Hydrocephalus is not considered here.<br />

Natural History:<br />

• The prevalence is about 1 in 700 low risk pregnancies.<br />

• Complete information of the natural history of isolated ventriculomegaly is not yet<br />

available, since careful long term studies have not been conducted. The size can<br />

stay the same or become smaller.<br />

• The majority of children appear to have normal development.<br />

• There is perhaps a 9% chance of cognitive disabilities, which can very in severity.<br />

This can occur even with resolution. There is a suggestion in the literature that<br />

those with a smaller increase in the ventricular measurement might have a smaller<br />

chance of an abnormal outocome. However, given the lack of appropriate longterm<br />

studies, it is suggested the risk of an abnormal outcome be treated with<br />

circumspection.<br />

• Progression to hydrocephalus can occur, but the chance of this is not well known.<br />

Progression is thought to occur in a minority of cases. There is an increased chance<br />

of other cerebral structural anomalies which might not be detectable on an antenatal<br />

ultrasound.<br />

Associations:<br />

• The chance of a fetal chromosome anomaly is estimated to be 3.8% (0-28.6%). The<br />

commonest is trisomy 21. It can be found in single gene disorders or sporadic<br />

conditions.<br />

• Ventriculomegaly is weakly associated with fetal infections, most commonly<br />

cytomegalovirus (CMV) or toxoplasmosis.<br />

10


Counselling:<br />

<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 11<br />

• detailed ultrasound to assess for other structural anomalies or soft signs, if not<br />

already completed<br />

• Additional ultrasound around 22 weeks, to look for possible progression to<br />

hydrocephalus. If persistent, another in the third trimester is suggested.<br />

Uncommonly, an MRI can detect additional anomalies, but this is not offered<br />

routinely.<br />

• fetal chromosome testing<br />

• intial and convalescent maternal titres for CMV, toxoplasmosis, parvovirus<br />

• postnatal assessment for dysmorphic features and neuroimaging, if persistent<br />

• postnatal followup of developmental milestones<br />

References:<br />

Kelly EN, et al., (2001). Mild ventriculomegaly in the fetus, natural history, associated<br />

findings and outcome of isolated mild ventriculomegaly. A literature review. Prenat<br />

Diagn 21:697.<br />

Wax JR, et al., (2004). Mild <strong>Fetal</strong> Cerebral Ventriculomegaly: diagnosis, clinical<br />

associations, and outcomes. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 58:407.<br />

11


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 12<br />

4. ENLARGED CISTERNA MAGNA December 2007<br />

The cisterna magna is a fluid collection posterior to the cerebellum. It is seen as an<br />

echo-free triangle with the point oriented towards the cerebellar vermis. Prenatally, the<br />

anterior/posterior diameter should be < 10 mm, with a normal appearing vermis, and<br />

without hydrocephalus. Visualization can be challenging, and must be done in the<br />

correct plane.<br />

Natural History:<br />

• Mega cisterna magna occurs in approximately 1/8200 pregnancies.<br />

• When isolated, most times the finding is benign. However, there are no large<br />

prospective series, with adequate outcome data.<br />

• Since visualization of the posterior fossa can be limited and because the<br />

development of the posterior fossa structures is a late embryologic event, there<br />

remains an unknown chance there could be other CNS anomalies, possibly<br />

detectable later in gestation, such as a Dandy-Walker malformation/variant.<br />

Associations:<br />

There might be an increased risk of a fetal chromosome anomaly, but more typically this<br />

is when the enlarged cisterna magna is found in association with other anomalies.<br />

Counselling:<br />

• When isolated, this is not an indication for fetal chromosome testing, but further<br />

investigation to look for other anomalies is indicated since some studies suggest that<br />

it is not isolated in more than 50% of cases.<br />

• Another ultrasound at 21-23 weeks is suggested. If there is any uncertainty about<br />

the fetal brain findings, an MRI would be considered.<br />

• The patient can consider prenatal chromosome testing.<br />

References:<br />

Van den Hof MC., et al. (2005) <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Soft</strong> markers in obstetric ultrasound. JOGC<br />

27:592-612.<br />

Haimovici JA., et al. (1997) Clinical signficiance of isolated enlargemetn of the cisternal<br />

magna (>10 mm) on prenatal sonography. J Ultraosund Med 16:731-734.<br />

Long A., et al. (2006) Outcome of fetal cerebral posterior fossa anomalies. Prenat Diag<br />

26:707-710.<br />

Foranzo F et al. (2007) Posterior fossa malformation in fetues: a report of 56 further<br />

cases and a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 27:495-501.<br />

12


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 13<br />

5. NASAL BONE HYPOPLASIA February 2008<br />

The optimal definition for this established second trimester marker for DS seems to be<br />

multiples of the median of nasal bone for the gestational age (1, 2, 3) .<br />

The regression curves used were based on NB of white fetuses. For race or ethnicity<br />

other than<br />

white a multiplicative correction factor was used to obtain MoM (African-American,<br />

Hispanic, Asian, other).<br />

Measurement of NB is performed as described by Sonek et al (4) . This takes into<br />

account the angle of measurement and placement of calipers for the length of the nasal<br />

bone.<br />

Maternal age at delivery is independent of nasal bone MoM in both affected and<br />

unaffected fetuses.<br />

There is a clear association between absent nasal bone and aneuploidy. <strong>Fetal</strong><br />

chromosome testing should be offered in these cases. The association between Down<br />

syndrome (and possibly trisomy 18) and nasal bone hypoplasia is less clear.<br />

Amniocentesis could be offered.<br />

References:<br />

1. Cusick W et al. (2007) Likelihood ratios for fetal trisomy 21 based on nasal bone<br />

length in the second trimester: how best to define hypoplasia? <strong>Ultrasound</strong> Obstet<br />

Gynecol 30:271-274.<br />

2. Odibo A et al. (2007) Defining nasal bone hypoplasia in second-trimester Down<br />

syndrome screening: does the use of multiples of the median improve screening<br />

efficacy? Am J Obstet and Gynecol 361 e1-e4.<br />

3. Gianferrari et al. (2007) Absent or shortened nasal bone length and detection o<br />

Down syndrome in second trimester fetuses. Obstet and Gynecol 109(1):371-375<br />

13


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 14<br />

6. INCREASED NUCHAL FOLD February 2008<br />

Measurement of the thickness of the skin of the posterior neck of >6mm in second<br />

trimester, between 16 weeks, 0 days, and


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 15<br />

7. ECHOGENIC INTRACARDIAC FOCUS September 2007<br />

The ultrasound visualizes an area (usually of the left ventricle) which is at least as<br />

echodense as bone, about 2 mm in diameter (can be up to 6 mm.) The pathologic basis<br />

is a discrete linear mineralization of the myocardial fusiform bundle of the chordae<br />

tendinae but why it occurs is unknown.<br />

Natural History:<br />

• Found in 0.46 - 3% of pregnancies<br />

• Might occur more frequently in fetuses of women of Asian, African and Middle<br />

Eastern ethnicities.<br />

• No long term cardiac consequences known.<br />

• Most disappear by the third trimester, but even when it persists, normal cardiac<br />

function is expected.<br />

Associations:<br />

• Associated with an increased risk of a chromosome problem, typically Down<br />

syndrome.<br />

• If occuring in the right ventricle, possibly the risk of a chromosome anomaly<br />

might be higher than if located in the left.<br />

Counselling:<br />

• Controversy exists as to whether amniocentesis should be offered due to<br />

significantly different conclusions by various authors.<br />

• Patient can consider amniocentesis.<br />

• Further ultrasound/echocardiograms are not required.<br />

References:<br />

Achiron et al, (1997) Obstet Gynecol 89:945-8.<br />

Huggon C et al (2001) <strong>Ultrasound</strong> Obstet Gynecol 17:11-16.<br />

Wax JR et al (2000) <strong>Ultrasound</strong> Obstet Gynecol 16(2):123-127.<br />

Sotiriadis A et al (2003) Diagnostic performance of intracardiac echogenic foci for Down<br />

syndrome: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 101:1009-1016.<br />

Smith-Bindman R et al (2001). Second-trimester ultrasound to detect fetuses with<br />

Down syndrome. A meta-analysis. JAMA 285:1044-1055.<br />

Goncalves, et al. (2006). Int J Gynecol Obstet 95:132-137.<br />

15


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 16<br />

8. SINGLE UMBILICAL ARTERY September 2007<br />

Natural History:<br />

• 0.3% -1% of 19 weeks gestation (total births and late pregnancy losses)<br />

• most have a normal outcome<br />

Associations<br />

• 19% had other ultrasound detectable anomalies (i.e. not isolated), often renal,<br />

cardiac or brain anomalies<br />

• If isolated, most newborns are normal, but there remains up to a 7% risk of other<br />

structural anomalies, not seen on antenatal ultrasound (heart, brain, kidney,<br />

limbs described)<br />

• small size (average weight 365 gm lower)<br />

• Possible increase in risk of preterm delivery<br />

• Slight increase in the risk of a chromosome abnormality, but usually with other<br />

structural anomalies<br />

Counselling and Management:<br />

• Detailed u/s at 19 weeks, including heart and great vessels<br />

• Chance of a fetal chromosome anomaly with an isolated single umbilical artery,<br />

is low enough that fetal chromosome testing is not warranted<br />

• Follow fetal growth with ultrasound<br />

• Careful physical examination for additional anomalies after birth<br />

References:<br />

Cantanzarite et al, (1995). Prenatal diagnosis of the two vessel cord: implications for<br />

patient counselling and obstetric management. <strong>Ultrasound</strong> Obstet Gynecol 5:98-105.<br />

Parill et al, (1995). The clinical significance of a single umbilical artery as an isolated<br />

finding on prenatal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 85:570-2.<br />

Chow JS, Benson CB, Doubilet PM (1998). Frequency and nature of structural<br />

anomalies in fetuses with single umbilical arteries. J <strong>Ultrasound</strong> Med 17:765-768.<br />

Rinehart BK, Terrone DA, Taylor CW, Issler CM, Larmon JE, Roberts WE (2000).<br />

Single umbilical artery is associated with an increased incidence of structural and<br />

chromosomal anomalies and growth restriction. Am J Perinat 17:229-232.<br />

Gornall AS, Kurinczuk JJ, Konje JC (2003). Antenatal detection of a single umbilical<br />

artery: does it matter? Prenat Diagn 23:117-123.<br />

16


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 17<br />

9. RENAL PYELECTASIS (pelviectasis) September 2007<br />

The AP diameter of renal pelvis is equal to or > 5 mm at gestations up to 32 weeks, 6<br />

days OR equal to or > 7 mm at gestations of 33 weeks to term. Any measurement >10<br />

mm is hydronephrosis.<br />

Natural History :<br />

• occurs in about 0.7%- 3% of all pregnancies, more common in males<br />

• 80% most resolve with no long term consequences, either in utero or in the first year<br />

Associations:<br />

• congenital hydronephrosis (diagnosed as > 10 mm after birth) – risk correlates with<br />

larger measurements<br />

• vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR)<br />

• more prevalent in fetus with trisomy 21 (isolated mild pyelectasis is present In about<br />

2% of babies with Down syndrome). The estimated likelihood ratio is low at 1.9, with<br />

very wide confidence intervals.<br />

Counselling and Management:<br />

• <strong>Ultrasound</strong>s – Since pelviectasis can progress, monitoring by ultrasound at 22-23<br />

weeks and after 28 weeks is suggested<br />

• <strong>Ultrasound</strong> does not discriminate between obstructive and non-obstructive<br />

uropathy in the second trimester<br />

• If persistent and greater than 10 mm after 28 weeks gestation, pediatric<br />

consultation is strongly suggested after delivery.<br />

• VUR can still occur after birth, even with regression of pelviectasis<br />

• Patient can consider amniocentesis.<br />

References:<br />

Courteville, JE et al, (1992). <strong>Fetal</strong> Pyelctasis and Down syndrome: Is genetic<br />

amniocentesis warranted? Obstet Gynecol 79:770-772.<br />

Wickstrom EA et al. (1996). Obstet Gynecol 88:379-382.<br />

Chudleigh T. (2001). Mild Pyelectasis. Prenat Diagn 21:936-941.<br />

Chudleigh PM et al. (2001). The association of aneuploidy and mild fetal pyelectasis in<br />

an unselected population: The results of a mulitcentre study. <strong>Ultrasound</strong> Obstet<br />

Gynecol. 17:197-202.<br />

Tovianinen-Salo S., et al. (2004). <strong>Fetal</strong> hydronephrosis: is there hope for consensus?<br />

Pediatr Radiol 34:519-529.<br />

17


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 18<br />

10. ECHOGENIC BOWEL February 2008<br />

The appearance on ultrasound of fetal bowel with an echogenicity similar to or greater<br />

than surrounding bone.<br />

Natural History:<br />

• Found in about 0.6-2.4% of all second trimester fetuses<br />

• Sometimes persists, sometimes disappears<br />

Associations:<br />

• usually is a normal variant<br />

• swallowed bloody amniotic fluid from a placental abruption or an invasive<br />

procedure, intraluminal inspissated meconium, or mesenteric ischemia.<br />

Increased risks of the following have been observed, but quantitation of the risk<br />

varies in the literature:<br />

• chromosome anomalies (trisomy 21 and others)<br />

• cystic fibrosis<br />

• congenital infection (CMV, occasionally other prenatal infections)<br />

• intrauterine growth retardation, which is associated with an increased risk of<br />

perinatal morbidity and mortality<br />

• GI malformations<br />

• alpha Thalassemia in Oriental population<br />

Counselling:<br />

• The patient can consider amniocentesis.<br />

• Cystic fibrosis – the risk of an affected child will vary, depending on the ethnicity,<br />

for CF is more prevalent in persons from northern Europe. Parental CF carrier<br />

testing can detect 80% of obligate carriers when parents are of northern<br />

European background, but this is lower in other ethnic groups. If both parents<br />

are carriers, definitive prenatal diagnosis is available.<br />

• Maternal initial and convalescent titres look for fetal infections.<br />

(CMV, herpes simplex, toxoplasmosis, parvovirus B19, varicella)<br />

• Detailed fetal ultrasound at 19-24 weeks to look for other structural anomalies<br />

and for evidence of bowel obstruction/perforation, and at 30-32 weeks. If the<br />

finding is persistent at the later ultrasound, or if there is IUGR or a GI anomaly,<br />

newborn pediatric consultation is needed.<br />

• Alpha Thalassemia screening of parents in Oriental families<br />

18


References:<br />

<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 19<br />

Benacerraf BR. (2005). The role of the second trimester genetic sonogram in screening<br />

for fetal Down syndrome. Semin Perinatolo 29: 386-394<br />

Bethune M. (2007). Literature review and suggested protocol fror managing ultrasound<br />

soft markers for Down syndrome: Thickened nuchal fold, echogeneic bowel, shortened<br />

femur, shortened humerus, pyelectasis and absent or hypoplastic nasal bone.<br />

Australasian Radiology 51:218-225.<br />

Carcopino X. et al. (2007). Foetal magnetic resonance imaging and echogenic bowel.<br />

Prenat Diagno 27: 272-278.<br />

Nyberg, et al., (1996). Echogenic fetal bowel during the second trimester: significance<br />

and implications for management. AM. J. Obstet Gynecol 173:1254-87.<br />

Slotnick RN et al., (1996). <strong>Fetal</strong> echogenic bowel: quantification and prospective<br />

evidence of fetal risk. Lancet 347:85.<br />

Lam YH, et al., (1999). Echogenic bowel in fetuses with homozygous alpha<br />

thalassemia – 1 in the first and second trimesters. Ultra Obstet Gynecol 14(3):180-182.<br />

Kesrouani AK et al.(2003). Etiology and outcome of fetal echogenic bowel. <strong>Fetal</strong><br />

Diagnosis and Therapy 18:240-246.<br />

19


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 20<br />

11. SHORT FEMUR LENGTH February 2008<br />

A short femur length is defined as either a measurement below the 2.5 th percentile for<br />

gestational age or a measurement that is less than 0.9 multiples of that predicted by the<br />

measured BPD. The relationship between bone length and head size may differ across<br />

racial groups.<br />

Natural History:<br />

• Likely normal variant of stature<br />

• Keep in mind ethnic differences in stature<br />

Associations:<br />

• associated with an increased risk of trisomy 21 (stronger if humeri are short too)<br />

• if severely shortened or presence of bowing, fractures, or reduced mineralization<br />

may be an initial sign of a skeletal dysplasia<br />

• occasionally an initial sign of IUGR<br />

Management:<br />

• <strong>Ultrasound</strong> - If gestation is < 18 weeks, suggest another 18-20 week ultrasound to<br />

assess bone growth. Other long bones should be assessed. Since there can be<br />

late detection of a skeletal dysplasia, another ultrasound around 23 weeks could be<br />

considered if there are persistent concerns on the 18-20 week ultrasound.<br />

• Patient can consider amniocentesis<br />

References:<br />

Benacerraf BR. (2005). The role of the second trimester genetic sonogram in screening<br />

for fetal Down syndrome. Semin Perinatolo 29: 386-394<br />

Bethune M. (2007). Literature review and suggested protocol fror managing ultrasound<br />

soft markers for Down syndrome: Thickened nuchal fold, echogeneic bowel, shortened<br />

femur, shortened humerus, pyelectasis and absent or hypoplastic nasal bone.<br />

Australasian Radiology 51:218-225.<br />

Nyberg DA et al., (1993). Humerus and femur length shortening in detection of Down's<br />

syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:534-8.<br />

Shipp TD et al. (2001). Variation in fetal femur length with respect to maternal race. J<br />

<strong>Ultrasound</strong> Med 20:141-144<br />

Shipp TD et al., (2002). Prenat Dx 22:296-307<br />

Snijders RJM et al. (2000). Femur length and trisomy 21: impact of gestational age on<br />

screening efficiency. <strong>Ultrasound</strong> Obstet Gynecol 16:142-145<br />

20


<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 21<br />

12.SHORT HUMERUS LENGTH February 2008<br />

A short humerus length is defined as either a measurement below the 2.5 th percentile<br />

for gestational age or a measurement that is less than 0.9 multiples of that predicted by<br />

the measured BPD. The relationship between bone length and head size may differ<br />

across racial groups.<br />

Natural History:<br />

• Likely normal variant of stature<br />

• Keep in mind ethnic differences in stature<br />

Associations:<br />

• Associated with an increased risk of trisomy 21<br />

• if severely shortened or presence of bowing, fractures, or reduced mineralization<br />

may be an initial sign of a skeletal dysplasia<br />

• occasionally an initial sign of IUGR<br />

Management:<br />

• <strong>Ultrasound</strong> - If gestation is < 18 weeks, suggest another 18-20 week ultrasound to<br />

assess bone growth. Other long bones should be assessed. Since there can be<br />

late detection of a skeletal dysplasia, another ultrasound around 23 weeks could be<br />

considered if there are persistent concerns on the 18-20 week ultrasound.<br />

• Patient can consider amniocentesis<br />

References:<br />

Benacerraf BR. (2005). The role of the second trimester genetic sonogram in screening<br />

for fetal Down syndrome. Semin Perinatolo 29: 386-394<br />

Bethune M. (2007). Literature review and suggested protocol fror managing ultrasound<br />

soft markers for Down syndrome: Thickened nuchal fold, echogeneic bowel, shortened<br />

femur, shortened humerus, pyelectasis and absent or hypoplastic nasal bone.<br />

Australasian Radiology 51:218-225.<br />

Kalelioglu IH. (2006): Humerus length measurement in Down syndrome screening. Clin<br />

Exp Obstet Gynecol. 34:93-5.<br />

Nyberg DA et al., (1993) Humerus and femur length shortening in detection of Down's<br />

syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:534-8.<br />

Shipp TD et al., (2002) Prenat Dx 22:296-307<br />

21


ULTRASOUND FINDING<br />

Increased nuchal<br />

translucency<br />

ASSOCIATED<br />

CHROMOSOME<br />

ABNORMALITY<br />

• T21<br />

• T18<br />

• 45,X<br />

• Other<br />

Absent nasal bone • T21<br />

• Lower<br />

for<br />

others<br />

Choroid Plexus Cyst T18<br />

OTHER POSSIBLE<br />

UNDERLYING<br />

DIAGNOSIS(ES) OR<br />

ASSOCIATED FINDINGS<br />

• CHD<br />

• Other structural<br />

• Single gene<br />

• IUD<br />

Ethnicity important NIL<br />

NIL NIL<br />

Drooping choroid Nil known ?Prelude to<br />

ventriculomegaly<br />

Mild Cerebral<br />

Ventrriculomegaly<br />

Any • Hydrocephalus<br />

• Other syndromes<br />

<strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Fetal</strong> <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

Page 22<br />

IN ADDITION TO AMNIO<br />

FOR KARYOTYPE<br />

• Detailed u/s<br />

• Echo<br />

Follow-up U/S<br />

• Congenital infection<br />

titres<br />

• Follow up U/S<br />

Enlarged cistern magna Unlikely • U/S at 21-23 weeks<br />

gestation<br />

• MRI<br />

Nasal bone hypoplasia Unclear NIL<br />

Increased nuchal fold • T21<br />

• Other<br />

• CHD<br />

• Single gene<br />

• Other<br />

Echo<br />

Echobright Cardiac<br />

Focus<br />

T21 NIL NIL<br />

Single umbilical artery T21 • Malformation of<br />

kidney, heart , GI, limb<br />

• Follow-up U/S<br />

• IUGR<br />

Renal Pyelectasis T21<br />

• obstructive uropathy Follow up U/S<br />

• VUR<br />

Echogenic Bowel • T21,<br />

• Other<br />

• Structural GI<br />

abnormality<br />

• CF<br />

• Congenital infection<br />

• IUGR<br />

• Intrauterine death<br />

• alpha thalassemia<br />

• CF carrier testing<br />

• Congenital Infection<br />

Titres<br />

• U/S<br />

• alpha thal screen in<br />

Orientals<br />

Short femur/humerus • T21 • Skeletal Dysplasia • Follow-up U/S<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!