Download PDF

Download PDF Download PDF

seaweedbase.com
from seaweedbase.com More from this publisher
24.04.2013 Views

20 INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. A Methodical Synopsis of British Plants, of which he gave himself two editions, and a third was published after his death by Dr. Diilenius. An emendated Method of Plants, concerning which I shall hereafter speak more at large. A controversial tract respecting the two contemporary systems of Rivinus and Tournefort. A Synopsis of Quadrupeds and Serpents. A Method of Insects. These works are all in Latin, by which means they are unfortunately less known in their own country than they are on tlie Continent: and to this list may be added. The editing of Willoughby's History of Birds, in Latin and also translating and publishing it in English. The editing of Willoughby's History of Fishes, in Latin. He left in manuscript an unfinished Historia Insectorum, which was published by Dr. Derham, who, after a long trouble, succeeded in obtaining from the bookseller in whose hands they had been lodged, Ray's Synopsis Avium, and his Synopsis Piscium ; both which Derham published. To this list might be added several philological, moral, and theological works; a volume of Travels, and two volumes of his Correspondence, which Derham and Scott have given to the world : but enough has been said to prove his indefatigable industry. To prosecute the history of botany since the time of Ray, in the same ample manner as I have dwelt upon the infancy of it, which is always the most interesting portion of the history of any science, would take up too much time. The remainder, therefore, can only be sketched by a hasty outline. In 1677 Dr. Plott gave the first natural history of a small local district, by publishing his Oxfordshire, which was succeeded two years afterwards by his Staifordshire these still remain very favourable specimens of this species of literature, and have not been exceeded. Sir Hans Sloane, Petiver apothecary to the Charter- House, and the elder Martyn Professor of Botany at Cambridge, were the principal disciples of Ray in this country. The French botanists mostly followed Tournefort, and the Germans Rivinus, or some of the modifications of his systematic arrangement, until a new adventurer appeared in the world of science^ who was destined to eiFect ; :

INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 21 a great cliange in botany, and who disputed the palm of victory with the celebrated Haller. What man, either of letters or science, has not heard of Haller? In poetry, devotion, anatomy, physiology, botany, literary history, he had few equals, perhaps no superior. In respect to botany, he was a follower of Ray, upon whom he bestows the highest praise, and attempted to render his arrangement still more natural than it is, using the simpler method of Ruppius as a finder, in consequence of the abstruseness of his own system. Unfortunately his labours were confined to the plants of Switzerland, while his competitor embraced the whole extent of nature, and each edition of his Catalogue was printed upon an expensive scale, in two elegant folio volumes, which rendered their circulation very confined, while his edition of Ruppius did not display the characters of the genera: otherwise the superiority of his own system, and the easiness of Ruppius's as an auxiliary, would have smothered the Linnsean botany in its birth. Hitherto the names of plants had remained nearly stationary'-, and if any alteration was attempted the name quoted by Caspar Bauhin, in his Pinax, was annexed as the common repertory of botanists. The uses also of plants had never been neglected. Another point Avas to use the words of the language, whether of the Latin or the vulgar tongue, in their usual signification. To these Ray had added a fourth, namely that to excite inquiry, he gave lists of such plants as were only imperfectly known to him. LinnaBus violated these old rules by degrees, as his systematic arrangement of plants became more and more in use. He changed the names of plants with the utmost unconcern ; he neglected almost entirely the detail of the uses ; and as to the language, he scrupled not to change the terms used in describing plants, and to affix new signi- fications to well-known words. Another peculiarity in Linnasus's writings is, that he does not give any lists of those natural substances of which he had only an imperfect knowledge: so that a person is apt to suppose them more perfect than they really are. Let it not however be thought, that some very great improvements were not introduced by him, particularly in the typographical execution of his works. His taking the characters of the families, from the same parts, although carried by him to excess, as being extended to the whole grand division, now called phenogamous plants, instead of being changed in each class according to circumstances, is 6

20 INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY.<br />

A Methodical Synopsis of British Plants, of which he<br />

gave himself two editions, and a third was published after<br />

his death by Dr. Diilenius.<br />

An emendated Method of Plants, concerning which I<br />

shall hereafter speak more at large.<br />

A controversial tract respecting the two contemporary<br />

systems of Rivinus and Tournefort.<br />

A Synopsis of Quadrupeds and Serpents.<br />

A Method of Insects.<br />

These works are all in Latin, by which means they are<br />

unfortunately less known in their own country than they<br />

are on tlie Continent: and to this list may be added.<br />

The editing of Willoughby's History of Birds, in Latin<br />

and also translating and publishing it in English.<br />

The editing of Willoughby's History of Fishes, in<br />

Latin.<br />

He left in manuscript an unfinished Historia Insectorum,<br />

which was published by Dr. Derham, who, after a<br />

long trouble, succeeded in obtaining from the bookseller<br />

in whose hands they had been lodged, Ray's Synopsis<br />

Avium, and his Synopsis Piscium ; both which Derham<br />

published. To this list might be added several philological,<br />

moral, and theological works; a volume of Travels, and two<br />

volumes of his Correspondence, which Derham and Scott<br />

have given to the world : but enough has been said to<br />

prove his indefatigable industry.<br />

To prosecute the history of botany since the time of<br />

Ray, in the same ample manner as I have dwelt upon<br />

the infancy of it, which is always the most interesting portion<br />

of the history of any science, would take up too<br />

much time. The remainder, therefore, can only be sketched<br />

by a hasty outline.<br />

In 1677 Dr. Plott gave the first natural history of a<br />

small local district, by publishing his Oxfordshire, which<br />

was succeeded two years afterwards by his Staifordshire<br />

these still remain very favourable specimens of this species<br />

of literature, and have not been exceeded.<br />

Sir Hans Sloane, Petiver apothecary to the Charter-<br />

House, and the elder Martyn Professor of Botany at<br />

Cambridge, were the principal disciples of Ray in this<br />

country. The French botanists mostly followed Tournefort,<br />

and the Germans Rivinus, or some of the modifications<br />

of his systematic arrangement, until a new adventurer<br />

appeared in the world of science^ who was destined to eiFect<br />

; :

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!