Download PDF
Download PDF Download PDF
V IJNTRODUCnON TO BOTANY. to the 27th book upon plants, as well philosophically as historically, medically, economically, magically, &c. A great part of his work is nearly the same as Dioscorides, who, however, is never quoted by name, and therefore, considering the candour with which Pliny names the writers from whom his book was extracted, there is reason to think that Dioscorides and Pliny wrote about the same time, and both made use of the same author, either Sextius Niger, or Diodorus, or Julius Bassus, but more probably, as it would appear from certain passages in Dioscorides, of Niger. Pliny, however, was a mere compiler, and Tvhatever knowledge of plants he might have acquired in his walks in the physic garden of Antonius Castor, it is certain that none of it appears in his work, which exhibits only a collection of memorandums badly translated from the Greek, in which, for want of critical and botanical knowledge, numerous mistakes are evident. The design of the work was grand, but far too vast to be accomplished by any one man, and especially by one immerged in public business. The order in which he has disposed his subjects is very confused. The great value of Pliny's work, therefore, consists in his having preserved to us the remains of ancient knowledge on the subject, and especially the application of it to the arts of life in those remote times, so that he may be considered as the historian of ancient botany ; and to his indefatigable industry we owe the names of several hundred substances not mentioned by those other ancient writers whose works have been preserved ; although it must be confessed, that much of this knowledge is of httle use, as the substances denoted by those names are un^ known for want of descrijitions. The next writer that occurs is Apulejus. This author, who lived in the second century, was born at Madura in Africa, which was then a kind of university. He afterwards studied at Carthage and Athens, and for some time applied himself to the profession of the law in Rome; but marrying a rich widow, he retired from ilie bar, and wholly gave himself up to philosophy and the practice of physic. He is well known as the author of " The Golden Ass" one of the few works of amusement, or what is called light reading, that have descended to us from the ancients. But the work which entitles him to our notice is his book, De Herbis, sive de Nominibus et Virtutibus Herbarum. In this work he gives the synonyuis of l.'^O medicinal herbs in (^reekj Latin, Egyptian, Punic, Celtic, Daciafl, and of
INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 9 some in the oriental languages, which he had acquired in his travels. After these names he adds a short description of the plant, the place of growth, and the properties of it. Some of the critics have supposed that this work is supposititious, and written long after his time. Johnson, wlio edited the second edition of Gerarde's Herbal, imagined it was the translation of a work written by some physician of Constantinople in the eighth century, but Fabricius thinks this conjecture is not probable ; indeed internal evidence seems against it. Apulejus was a heathen priest, well read in his religion, and much attached to it, as well by natural inclination as from the persecutions he suffered from the Christian relations of his wife, who accused him of magic, and of obtaining her hand and fortune by sorcer}^; now the work is filled with those modes of exhibiting remedies, which, although only intended by the practitioner to aid their operation by the power of fancy, are usually considered by others as superstitious, and even magical. Galen, who was born about 133 years after Christ, was contemporary with Apulejus, and became so celebrated as a physician and medical writer, as to have entirely ruled in the schools of medicine, to the exclusion of almost every other author. His industry in acquiring a knowledge of the materia medica, including medical botany, was very great, as he sailed to Lemnos to investigate the terra Lemnia in its native bed, to Cyprus to visit the mines and collect cadmia, pompholyx, diphryges, chalcanthum, and other minerals; as also to Cilicia, Phoenicia, Crete, and Egypt. His writings are as remarkable for their diffuse style, and his continual digressions, as those of Pliny are for their conciseness ; and it is not easy to say which is the most tiresome to the reader, or requires the steadiest attention to peruse. Galen principally treats of plants in the sixth, seventh, and eighth books of his work. On Simples, in which he mentions the uses of about 450 medical plants. He also occasionally treats of several others in different parts of his works. It was his great object to account for their effects from the second and third qualities, as they were called ; that is to say, from the degree of their dryness or moisture, and heat and coldness, of each of which he distinguishes four degrees. In his introduction, he writes against those authors who had attempted to describe plants, and thinks the knowledge of them is better acquired by tradition. When we consider the great authority which the writings of Galen bore ip the schools of medicine for
- Page 2: 3 2044 106 366 750 LIBRARY OF THE G
- Page 7 and 8: o NATURAL ARRANGEMENT OF BRITISH PL
- Page 9 and 10: TO THE MOST REVEREND CHARLES, BY DI
- Page 11 and 12: PREFACE. A VARIETY of methods have
- Page 13 and 14: PREFACE. Vll ticular organs, common
- Page 15 and 16: PREFACE. IX plants : and there have
- Page 17 and 18: PllEFACE. XI Botanica. Whatever opi
- Page 19 and 20: PREFACE. Xiii laid down, and they a
- Page 21 and 22: THE GENERA OF BRITISH PLANTS, Accor
- Page 23 and 24: F. 193. Thamnidiura I 194. Mucor 5
- Page 25 and 26: 2. PLANT.E ENDOGENiE. 2 A. Pl. end.
- Page 27 and 28: 3. PLANT.E EXOGENiE. 3 A. Pl. ex. m
- Page 29 and 30: 161. Arbutus 1 162. Uva ursi 2 B. 1
- Page 31 and 32: 356. Potentnia 14 357. Fragaria 2 3
- Page 33 and 34: XXVll TOTAL NUMBERS. Fam. Gen. Spec
- Page 35 and 36: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. I. On the U
- Page 37 and 38: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 3 cicely, o
- Page 39 and 40: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 2. The Rise
- Page 41: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 7 copious.
- Page 45 and 46: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 11 Glanvill
- Page 47 and 48: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 13 Others w
- Page 49 and 50: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 15 case, th
- Page 51 and 52: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 17 the hand
- Page 53 and 54: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 19 mentione
- Page 55 and 56: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 21 a great
- Page 57 and 58: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANV. 23 pur than
- Page 59 and 60: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 25 1623. C.
- Page 61 and 62: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 1696. Ray S
- Page 63 and 64: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 29 174-2. H
- Page 65 and 66: NTRODUCTION TO EOTANY« SI 1778. Bo
- Page 67 and 68: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. S3 1796. Do
- Page 69 and 70: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 35 *1807. H
- Page 71 and 72: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 37 Membrano
- Page 73 and 74: INTRODUCTION" TO BOTANY. 39 Fibre,
- Page 75 and 76: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 41 'Nectar.
- Page 77 and 78: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 43 51 Wild,
- Page 79 and 80: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 4S ^ Dermol
- Page 81 and 82: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 47 Woodland
- Page 83 and 84: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 4© Root st
- Page 85 and 86: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 51 7. Surfa
- Page 87 and 88: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 55 Medullar
- Page 89 and 90: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. Acute-angle
- Page 91 and 92: INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. 57 Creeping
V IJNTRODUCnON TO BOTANY.<br />
to the 27th book upon plants, as well philosophically as<br />
historically, medically, economically, magically, &c. A<br />
great part of his work is nearly the same as Dioscorides,<br />
who, however, is never quoted by name, and therefore,<br />
considering the candour with which Pliny names the writers<br />
from whom his book was extracted, there is reason to<br />
think that Dioscorides and Pliny wrote about the same<br />
time, and both made use of the same author, either Sextius<br />
Niger, or Diodorus, or Julius Bassus, but more probably,<br />
as it would appear from certain passages in Dioscorides,<br />
of Niger. Pliny, however, was a mere compiler, and<br />
Tvhatever knowledge of plants he might have acquired in<br />
his walks in the physic garden of Antonius Castor, it is<br />
certain that none of it appears in his work, which exhibits<br />
only a collection of memorandums badly translated from<br />
the Greek, in which, for want of critical and botanical<br />
knowledge, numerous mistakes are evident. The design<br />
of the work was grand, but far too vast to be accomplished<br />
by any one man, and especially by one immerged in public<br />
business. The order in which he has disposed his subjects<br />
is very confused. The great value of Pliny's work, therefore,<br />
consists in his having preserved to us the remains of<br />
ancient knowledge on the subject, and especially the application<br />
of it to the arts of life in those remote times, so<br />
that he may be considered as the historian of ancient botany<br />
; and to his indefatigable industry we owe the names<br />
of several hundred substances not mentioned by those other<br />
ancient writers whose works have been preserved ; although<br />
it must be confessed, that much of this knowledge is of httle<br />
use, as the substances denoted by those names are un^<br />
known for want of descrijitions.<br />
The next writer that occurs is Apulejus. This author,<br />
who lived in the second century, was born at Madura in<br />
Africa, which was then a kind of university. He afterwards<br />
studied at Carthage and Athens, and for some time applied<br />
himself to the profession of the law in Rome; but marrying<br />
a rich widow, he retired from ilie bar, and wholly gave<br />
himself up to philosophy and the practice of physic. He<br />
is well known as the author of " The Golden Ass" one of<br />
the few works of amusement, or what is called light reading,<br />
that have descended to us from the ancients. But the<br />
work which entitles him to our notice is his book, De<br />
Herbis, sive de Nominibus et Virtutibus Herbarum. In<br />
this work he gives the synonyuis of l.'^O medicinal herbs in<br />
(^reekj Latin, Egyptian, Punic, Celtic, Daciafl, and of