24.04.2013 Views

Download PDF

Download PDF

Download PDF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

234 TNTRODUCTION TO BOTANY.<br />

majority of readers the power of referring to so manyworks,<br />

some probably very expensive; nor does the mere<br />

quoting of these trivial names, and the works in which<br />

they are used, give the same satisfaction to the reader, as<br />

common types with specific differences, while it is equally<br />

long in reading, although, from the contractions used in<br />

printing the titles of the books, it appears much shorter<br />

to the eye, it is not so easy to remember.<br />

To avoid in part these inconveniences, it has lately been<br />

proposed, when plants are removed from one genus to another,<br />

to give the preference, in all cases, to the adjunct<br />

given by Linneeus himself, or the first of his followers who<br />

has mentioned the plant, unless this adjunct has been already<br />

applied to some other species in the genus into which<br />

it is removed : but the changes made by Linnaeus, and still<br />

more those by his followers, have so embroiled the science,<br />

in applying the names of the older authors to far different<br />

plants than those to which they were originally applied; as<br />

melia, a name given by the ancients to a species of ash, is<br />

applied by them to an Indian shrub; bromelia, another<br />

species of Grecian ash, to an American tree; and gingidium,<br />

the name of a Greek umbelliferous plant, to a plant of the<br />

South Sea Islands; that it would appear necessary to go<br />

still further back, and to establish as a canon, that the<br />

name given to a plant by the oldest author, who has so<br />

described, or otherwise designated the plant, in the language<br />

in which we speak or write, as to render us certain,<br />

of its due application to the plant of which we treat, shall<br />

be esteemed the preferable name for it, although the substantive<br />

should not be the same as the name of the genus<br />

'Under which it is arranged in the system that may happen<br />

to be in fashion; indeed, if this anomaly should, contrary<br />

to the opinion and practice of Ray, who always used" the<br />

names of the authors whose writings were in common circulation,<br />

although the substantive might be different, be<br />

esteemed of any consequence, the method used by Boerhaave,<br />

of connecting the name of the genus when different<br />

from the substantive, by the introduction of the relative<br />

and the ellipsis of the substantive verb, in the manner by<br />

which the synonyms of Ptay have been quoted, as for example,<br />

the adiantum album crispum alpinum of Schwenck-<br />

feld being placed by Ray in his genus, Filix foemina, is<br />

thus quoted in vol. ii. p. 16, Filix foemina quae (est) Adi-<br />

" antum album, &c. By this means alone can the perma-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!