24.04.2013 Views

Download PDF

Download PDF

Download PDF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vlll<br />

PREFACE.<br />

plants by those organs that appear to be analogous in their<br />

functions to the sexual organs of animals. Assuming the<br />

flowering of plants to be what he poetically terms their<br />

nuptials, he likened each separate flower to a bridal cham-<br />

ber, and formed his primary divisions from the number of<br />

the male organs present in each flower, and his subdivisions<br />

were formed from the number of the female organs which<br />

were also present in the same chamber: the Omniscient<br />

Creator having lessened the chances of failure arising from<br />

the immobility of plants b}' multiplying the points of union,<br />

and increasing the number of the organs, especially of the<br />

male. As Linnseus considered not only the number of<br />

these organs, but in many cases their situation, connection,<br />

and proportion, he has departed from the simplicity which<br />

ought to form the basis of an artificial system and was so<br />

strictly observed by Rivinus, and has rendered his system<br />

as intricate as some of those who endeavoured to place<br />

kindred plants together. His successor in the chair at<br />

Upsal, Thunberg, has therefore endeavoured to simplify<br />

his method, but with considerable opposition. While<br />

Ludwig, in the second edition of his Genera, and Hill,<br />

along with the primary divisions of Rivinus taken from the<br />

corolla employed those of Linnaeus for their subdivisions,<br />

but have not met with any followers.<br />

The novelty of the Linnaean method, the distinction of<br />

the species being always taken from the variations to be<br />

observed in the plant itself, together with the industry of<br />

Linnseus and his followers in extending his catalogue, and<br />

forming, as it were, a new science, that of the nomenclature<br />

of plants, instead of the old botany, which, as we have said,<br />

principally devoted itself to the uses of plants, all contributed<br />

to give an eclat to his system, and to extend its influence<br />

beyond its proper limits. So that instead of being taught<br />

to use this method only as a finder, or as an index to the<br />

authors who wrote on the natural history of plants, the<br />

student was led to believe that this was the only arrangement<br />

that ough£ to be adopted in all works that treat of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!