annual report print final.qxd - Asian Centre for Human Rights
annual report print final.qxd - Asian Centre for Human Rights
annual report print final.qxd - Asian Centre for Human Rights
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INDIA HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT 2005 Gujarat<br />
acquitted by the trial courts and to<br />
recommend whether or not to prefer<br />
appeals. The Supreme Court asked the<br />
Advocate General to scrutinise in<br />
conjunction with the State Law Secretary<br />
all the orders of acquittals given by the<br />
trial courts and suggest whether or not<br />
appeal should be filed in these cases. The<br />
Court further directed that in future, in all<br />
cases pertaining to acquittal in riots cases,<br />
the Advocate General’s view would be<br />
taken into consideration by the Law<br />
Department be<strong>for</strong>e deciding whether or<br />
not to prefer an appeal. 15 The Advocate<br />
General in<strong>for</strong>med that out of 217 cases, the<br />
government had decided to prefer appeals<br />
in 45 cases and 16 were under process and<br />
the remaining 156 cases were pending<br />
consideration. 16<br />
Obtaining justice remained<br />
insurmountable because of the sheer<br />
unwillingness of the State government to<br />
prosecute the culprits. The lack of<br />
protection <strong>for</strong> witnesses, threat to human<br />
rights defenders, public prosecutors acting<br />
more than defence lawyers and biased<br />
judiciary at the state level were some of<br />
the key reasons.<br />
Best Bakery Case: Twists and turns of<br />
the denial of justice<br />
The Best Bakery case explains the<br />
twists and turns of the denial of justice and<br />
the difficulty in establishing justice.<br />
Taking the entire chronology of events<br />
right from the date of incident to the<br />
judgement of the trial court and that of the<br />
High Court, Supreme Court remarked “if<br />
66<br />
one cursorily glances through the records<br />
of the case, one gets a feeling that the<br />
justice delivery system was being taken<br />
<strong>for</strong> a ride and literally allowed to be<br />
abused, misused and mutilated by<br />
subterfuge.”<br />
“The investigation appears to be<br />
perfunctory and anything but impartial<br />
without any definite object of finding out<br />
the truth and bringing to book those who<br />
were responsible <strong>for</strong> the crime,” it said.<br />
In a stinging criticism of the public<br />
prosecutor, the court said he acted more as<br />
a “defence counsel” and added “the trial<br />
court in turn appeared to be a silent<br />
spectator, mute to the manipulations and<br />
preferred to be indifferent to sacrilege<br />
being committed to justice.”<br />
Chronology of events:<br />
01.03.2002: 14 people were burnt<br />
alive and six injured when a mob set<br />
ablaze Best Bakery on the outskirts of<br />
Vadodara in the aftermath of the February<br />
27 Godhra train carnage.<br />
10.03.2002: Case handed over to<br />
crime branch police and 21 accused<br />
arrested.<br />
09.05.2003: Trial begun in the Fast-<br />
Track court of Additional Sessions Judge<br />
H U Mahida.<br />
17.05.2003: Prime witness Zahira<br />
Sheikh and her mother Shaherunissa<br />
turned hostile in court.<br />
27.06.2003: All 21 accused acquitted<br />
by the trial court <strong>for</strong> want of evidence.<br />
07.07.2003: At a press meet in<br />
Mumbai, Zahira demanded retrial of the<br />
case alleging that BJP MLA Madhu