24.04.2013 Views

annual report print final.qxd - Asian Centre for Human Rights

annual report print final.qxd - Asian Centre for Human Rights

annual report print final.qxd - Asian Centre for Human Rights

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INDIA HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT 2005 Gujarat<br />

acquitted by the trial courts and to<br />

recommend whether or not to prefer<br />

appeals. The Supreme Court asked the<br />

Advocate General to scrutinise in<br />

conjunction with the State Law Secretary<br />

all the orders of acquittals given by the<br />

trial courts and suggest whether or not<br />

appeal should be filed in these cases. The<br />

Court further directed that in future, in all<br />

cases pertaining to acquittal in riots cases,<br />

the Advocate General’s view would be<br />

taken into consideration by the Law<br />

Department be<strong>for</strong>e deciding whether or<br />

not to prefer an appeal. 15 The Advocate<br />

General in<strong>for</strong>med that out of 217 cases, the<br />

government had decided to prefer appeals<br />

in 45 cases and 16 were under process and<br />

the remaining 156 cases were pending<br />

consideration. 16<br />

Obtaining justice remained<br />

insurmountable because of the sheer<br />

unwillingness of the State government to<br />

prosecute the culprits. The lack of<br />

protection <strong>for</strong> witnesses, threat to human<br />

rights defenders, public prosecutors acting<br />

more than defence lawyers and biased<br />

judiciary at the state level were some of<br />

the key reasons.<br />

Best Bakery Case: Twists and turns of<br />

the denial of justice<br />

The Best Bakery case explains the<br />

twists and turns of the denial of justice and<br />

the difficulty in establishing justice.<br />

Taking the entire chronology of events<br />

right from the date of incident to the<br />

judgement of the trial court and that of the<br />

High Court, Supreme Court remarked “if<br />

66<br />

one cursorily glances through the records<br />

of the case, one gets a feeling that the<br />

justice delivery system was being taken<br />

<strong>for</strong> a ride and literally allowed to be<br />

abused, misused and mutilated by<br />

subterfuge.”<br />

“The investigation appears to be<br />

perfunctory and anything but impartial<br />

without any definite object of finding out<br />

the truth and bringing to book those who<br />

were responsible <strong>for</strong> the crime,” it said.<br />

In a stinging criticism of the public<br />

prosecutor, the court said he acted more as<br />

a “defence counsel” and added “the trial<br />

court in turn appeared to be a silent<br />

spectator, mute to the manipulations and<br />

preferred to be indifferent to sacrilege<br />

being committed to justice.”<br />

Chronology of events:<br />

01.03.2002: 14 people were burnt<br />

alive and six injured when a mob set<br />

ablaze Best Bakery on the outskirts of<br />

Vadodara in the aftermath of the February<br />

27 Godhra train carnage.<br />

10.03.2002: Case handed over to<br />

crime branch police and 21 accused<br />

arrested.<br />

09.05.2003: Trial begun in the Fast-<br />

Track court of Additional Sessions Judge<br />

H U Mahida.<br />

17.05.2003: Prime witness Zahira<br />

Sheikh and her mother Shaherunissa<br />

turned hostile in court.<br />

27.06.2003: All 21 accused acquitted<br />

by the trial court <strong>for</strong> want of evidence.<br />

07.07.2003: At a press meet in<br />

Mumbai, Zahira demanded retrial of the<br />

case alleging that BJP MLA Madhu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!