24.04.2013 Views

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 3. WHERE BUDDHA ENDS KRISHNA BEGINS<br />

yours. When you say ”I” it means the one imprisoned inside your body, but when <strong>Krishna</strong> says it he<br />

means that which permeates the whole cosmos. Hence he has the courage to tell Arjuna, ”Give up<br />

everything else <strong>and</strong> <strong>com</strong>e to my feet.” If it were the same ”I” as yours – a prisoner of the body – it<br />

would be impossible for him to say a thing like this. And Arjuna would have been hurt if <strong>Krishna</strong>’s<br />

”I” were as petty ss yours. Arjuna would have immediately retorted, ”What are you saying? Why on<br />

earth should I surrender to you?” Arjuna would have really been hurt, but he was not.<br />

Whenever someone speaks to another in the language of the ego, it creates an instant reaction<br />

in the ego of the other. When you say something in the words of the ”I” of the ego, the other<br />

immediately begins to speak the same language. We are skilled in knowing the undertones of each<br />

other’s words, <strong>and</strong> we react sharply.<br />

But <strong>Krishna</strong>’s ”I” is absolutely free of all traces of egoism, <strong>and</strong> for this reason he could call upon<br />

Arjuna to make a clean surrender to him. Here, ”Surrender to me” really means ”Surrender to the<br />

whole. Surrender to the primordial <strong>and</strong> mysterious energy that permeates the cosmos.”<br />

Egolessness <strong>com</strong>es to Buddha <strong>and</strong> Mahavira too, but it <strong>com</strong>es to them after long, hard struggle <strong>and</strong><br />

toil. But it may not <strong>com</strong>e to most of their followers, because on their paths it is the very last thing to<br />

<strong>com</strong>e. So the followers may <strong>com</strong>e to it or they may not. But egolessness <strong>com</strong>es first with <strong>Krishna</strong>;<br />

he begins where Buddha <strong>and</strong> Mahavira end. So one who chooses to go with <strong>Krishna</strong> has to have it<br />

at the very beginning. If he fails, there is no question of his going with <strong>Krishna</strong>.<br />

You can walk a long way in the <strong>com</strong>pany of Mahavira with your ”I” intact, but with <strong>Krishna</strong> you have<br />

to drop your ”I” with the first step; otherwise you are not going to go with him. Your ”I” can find<br />

some ac<strong>com</strong>modation with Mahavira, but none with <strong>Krishna</strong>. For <strong>Krishna</strong> the first step is the last;<br />

for Mahavira <strong>and</strong> Buddha the last step is the first. And it is important for you to bear this difference<br />

in mind, because it is a big difference, <strong>and</strong> a basic difference at that.<br />

What sadhana can you do with <strong>Krishna</strong>? You can dance with him, you can sing with him, you can<br />

celebrate with him, <strong>and</strong> you can merge with him. Or if you call this sadhana, then it is a different<br />

matter. <strong>The</strong>refore <strong>Krishna</strong> has no expectations from you. What is there to expect when the journey<br />

begins with egolessness? If you go to Buddha or Mahavira to say you are an egoist <strong>and</strong> want to be<br />

free of it, he will give you some method, he will tell you to first give up this <strong>and</strong> give up that <strong>and</strong> then<br />

the problem of the ego will be taken care of. But if you go to <strong>Krishna</strong> with the same question, he will<br />

not prescribe any methods, he will say the ego has to go in the first instance, that you have to begin<br />

with its cessation. <strong>Krishna</strong> will say that methods <strong>and</strong> techniques are ways of postponement. That is<br />

why no <strong>com</strong>munity of seekers could grow around him it was not in the very nature of things.<br />

As far as a seeker is concerned, he very much likes to play with methods. He will say it is very<br />

difficult to part with the ego, but he can part with his money if it is going to help. But <strong>Krishna</strong> is not<br />

going to oblige you. He will say parting with money won’t do, because your disease will continue to<br />

afflict you even if you give up all your wealth. If a man suffering from cancer says he cannot give<br />

up his cancer, but he can get his head shaved, what will you say? Shaving his head will make no<br />

difference whatsoever to his disease, the cancer will continue to torment him. <strong>The</strong>re is no connection<br />

between cancer <strong>and</strong> shaving; cancer will continue to be a problem even if you shave your head a<br />

hundred times. If the seeker says to begin with, he is prepared to give up his clothes, <strong>Krishna</strong> will<br />

say clothes have nothing to do with cancer.<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 51 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!