Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com
Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com
CHAPTER 21. CHOOSE THE FLUTE OR PERISH Let me explain to you what religion and irreligion are according to Krishna. That which helps life grow, flower and dance ecstatically is religion. And that which impedes life’s growth, which distorts and stifles life’s flowering, which smothers life’s joy and festivity is irreligion. Irreligion is what blocks and suffocates life; religion is what helps it to come to its fulfillment. Question 2 QUESTIONER: WHO HAS EVER UNDERSTOOD AND IMBIBED KRISHNA RIGHTLY? WHAT SHOULD ONE DO TO IMBIBE HIM? CAN YOU GIVE AN OUTLINE OF HUMAN CIVILIZATION AND CULTURE PATTERNED ON. KRISHNA’S LIFE AND TEACHINGS? How can one imbibe another? How can one take after Krishna or anyone else? And why? Is it incumbent on me to imbibe another, become like another? I can only imbibe and be myself, not Krishna. Krishna does not pattern himself after another. He imbibes himself and remains himself. Why should another try to pattern himself after Krishna, to be like him? It is enough that I imbibe myself and am totally myself. No, to imbibe another, to be like another, is the worst kind of corruption, and it is the greatest injustice that someone can do to himself. The whole idea of imitation is mistaken and wrong. I have my own soul which should come to its full flowering. What will happen to it, to my own soul if I imbibe another and copy him? It is true, I can impose another’s personality on myself, which can overpower me, but what will happen to me, to my own being? I owe a responsibility to myself, and if I become like someone else I will be betraying myself. No, it is enough if one understands Krishna. Trying to be like him is utterly uncalled for. Understanding is enough. And one should understand him, not with a view to imbibe and imitate him, to be his carbon-copy, but to understand himself and be himself. You certainly have to know how a person like Krishna is fulfilled and also know the laws of this fulfillment. You certainly have to understand how Krishna attains to his naturalness and spontaneity, so that you can come to your own naturalness and spontaneity. Krishna’s life can give you a cue, a clue to know yourself and come to yourself. If Krishna can flower, why not you? If Krishna’s selfnature can blossom, why should you go on withering and wasting as you do? If Krishna can laugh and sing and dance, why should you continue to shed tears and be miserable? It is not that you will dance the way Krishna dances. Your dance will be different, it will be your own; you will uncover your own innate dance. You don’t have to copy Krishna’s dance, you have only to know the law that helped him to find his dance and be fulfilled. Krishna’s life can help you in self discovery, which is of the highest. Self discovery, and not assimilation or imitation, is what you have to seek. And Krishna’s life can be of tremendous help in this adventure. So the first thing to know is that no one can be your ideal, not even Krishna. And you need not follow and imitate another, Krishna included. It is true that any number of people have wasted their lives following and imitating others. In reality, no one can wholly succeed in becoming like another; it is impossible. You can impose another’s Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy 412 Osho
CHAPTER 21. CHOOSE THE FLUTE OR PERISH personality on yourself, wear his mask and look like him, but you cannot make your very soul into him. Do what you can, you cannot succeed; at best you can enact him, but it will not be more than acting. Being cannot be borrowed; it is always one’s own. In spite of all efforts, you will remain what you innately are. Imitation is dangerous in many ways. To imitate someone you have to suppress yourself, suppress your individuality, your self-nature. And this suppression can be so deep that you will lose all con tact with yourself – which is the worst thing that can happen to any individual. Although you will yet survive at your innermost core as yourself, you will now be far removed from yourself. That is the problem. Millions of people down the ages have tried to imitate Krishna, Buddha, Christ and others, but none has succeeded so far. Success is impossible. Five thousand years have passed since Krishna happened, but there has not been a second Krishna in all history. Twenty-five hundred years have passed after Buddha, and there has not yet been another Buddha. Nor has there been another Zarathustra, Jesus, or Mohammed. Whosoever tries to imitate others is destined to court failure. It is really worse than failure, it is disaster, it is suicide. Even as suicide it is the worst kind. In ordinary suicide, as we know, only one’s physical form is destroyed. In this suicide the very soul is sought to be destroyed. So all followers, all disciples, all imitators are suicidal. Many people try to imitate Krishna, and in the process they not only injure themselves but they also injure Krishna. If you copy Krishna, you will, with all your efforts, make yourself a caricature of him. And this thing will not only distort you, but it will also distort Krishna’s image. You will imitate him in your own way, and to that extent you will distort him, you will adulterate him. So you are not only insulting and abusing yourself, but you are also insulting and abusing Krishna. So this imitation is really outrageous. All theologians, all priests – whether they follow Krishna or Christ – are guilty of this crime. And they all tell the same story – the story of man’s failure to be himself, the story of man’s attempts at suicide. But we cannot say the same thing about Meera and Chaitanya. They are a class by themselves, and they are certainly no imitators. Through understanding Krishna’s ways of expressing himself, his self nature, Meera and Chaitanya express themselves as they are; they reveal their own distinctive self natures. They don’t impose Krishna on themselves, nor do they ape his lifestyle, his demeanor, his songs and dances. They sing their own songs; they dance their own dances. So Meera remains Meera and Chaitanya re mains Chaitanya. Of course they carry with them their love of Krishna, and as this love grows Chaitanya and Meera disappear as egos. As this love grows even Krishna disappears and only love remains. If you ask Chaitanya if he is Chaitanya or Krishna in that moment, he will say, ”I really don’t know who I am; I even don’t know if I am.” In this moment even the ”I” disappears, and only an ”am-ness” remains. This is pure existence. And this achievement of Chaitanya is the flowering and fruition of his own self-nature. There is nothing of imitation about it, We are all prone to imitate others. And there is a good reason for it. Imitation is like ready-made garments: buy and wear garments. You don’t have to do a thing, not even to wait for them. It suits our easygoing minds which want everything gratuitously. Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy 413 Osho
- Page 361 and 362: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 363 and 364: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 365 and 366: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 367 and 368: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 369 and 370: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 371 and 372: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 373 and 374: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 375 and 376: 5 October 1970 am in Question 1 CHA
- Page 377 and 378: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 379 and 380: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 381 and 382: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 383 and 384: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 385 and 386: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 387 and 388: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 389 and 390: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 391 and 392: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 393 and 394: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 395 and 396: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 397 and 398: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 399 and 400: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 401 and 402: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
- Page 403 and 404: CHAPTER 21. CHOOSE THE FLUTE OR PER
- Page 405 and 406: CHAPTER 21. CHOOSE THE FLUTE OR PER
- Page 407 and 408: CHAPTER 21. CHOOSE THE FLUTE OR PER
- Page 409 and 410: CHAPTER 21. CHOOSE THE FLUTE OR PER
- Page 411: CHAPTER 21. CHOOSE THE FLUTE OR PER
- Page 415 and 416: CHAPTER 21. CHOOSE THE FLUTE OR PER
- Page 417 and 418: CHAPTER 21. CHOOSE THE FLUTE OR PER
- Page 419 and 420: CHAPTER 22. SANNYAS IS OF THE HIGHE
- Page 421 and 422: CHAPTER 22. SANNYAS IS OF THE HIGHE
- Page 423 and 424: CHAPTER 22. SANNYAS IS OF THE HIGHE
- Page 425 and 426: CHAPTER 22. SANNYAS IS OF THE HIGHE
- Page 427 and 428: CHAPTER 22. SANNYAS IS OF THE HIGHE
- Page 429 and 430: CHAPTER 22. SANNYAS IS OF THE HIGHE
- Page 431 and 432: CHAPTER 22. SANNYAS IS OF THE HIGHE
- Page 433 and 434: CHAPTER 22. SANNYAS IS OF THE HIGHE
- Page 435: CHAPTER 22. SANNYAS IS OF THE HIGHE
CHAPTER 21. CHOOSE THE FLUTE OR PERISH<br />
Let me explain to you what religion <strong>and</strong> irreligion are according to <strong>Krishna</strong>. That which helps life<br />
grow, flower <strong>and</strong> dance ecstatically is religion. And that which impedes life’s growth, which distorts<br />
<strong>and</strong> stifles life’s flowering, which smothers life’s joy <strong>and</strong> festivity is irreligion. Irreligion is what blocks<br />
<strong>and</strong> suffocates life; religion is what helps it to <strong>com</strong>e to its fulfillment.<br />
Question 2<br />
QUESTIONER: WHO HAS EVER UNDERSTOOD AND IMBIBED KRISHNA RIGHTLY? WHAT<br />
SHOULD ONE DO TO IMBIBE HIM? CAN YOU GIVE AN OUTLINE OF HUMAN CIVILIZATION<br />
AND CULTURE PATTERNED ON. KRISHNA’S LIFE AND TEACHINGS?<br />
How can one imbibe another? How can one take after <strong>Krishna</strong> or anyone else? And why? Is it<br />
incumbent on me to imbibe another, be<strong>com</strong>e like another? I can only imbibe <strong>and</strong> be myself, not<br />
<strong>Krishna</strong>.<br />
<strong>Krishna</strong> does not pattern himself after another. He imbibes himself <strong>and</strong> remains himself. Why should<br />
another try to pattern himself after <strong>Krishna</strong>, to be like him? It is enough that I imbibe myself <strong>and</strong> am<br />
totally myself. No, to imbibe another, to be like another, is the worst kind of corruption, <strong>and</strong> it is the<br />
greatest injustice that someone can do to himself.<br />
<strong>The</strong> whole idea of imitation is mistaken <strong>and</strong> wrong. I have my own soul which should <strong>com</strong>e to its full<br />
flowering. What will happen to it, to my own soul if I imbibe another <strong>and</strong> copy him? It is true, I can<br />
impose another’s personality on myself, which can overpower me, but what will happen to me, to my<br />
own being? I owe a responsibility to myself, <strong>and</strong> if I be<strong>com</strong>e like someone else I will be betraying<br />
myself.<br />
No, it is enough if one underst<strong>and</strong>s <strong>Krishna</strong>. Trying to be like him is utterly uncalled for.<br />
Underst<strong>and</strong>ing is enough. And one should underst<strong>and</strong> him, not with a view to imbibe <strong>and</strong> imitate<br />
him, to be his carbon-copy, but to underst<strong>and</strong> himself <strong>and</strong> be himself.<br />
You certainly have to know how a person like <strong>Krishna</strong> is fulfilled <strong>and</strong> also know the laws of this<br />
fulfillment. You certainly have to underst<strong>and</strong> how <strong>Krishna</strong> attains to his naturalness <strong>and</strong> spontaneity,<br />
so that you can <strong>com</strong>e to your own naturalness <strong>and</strong> spontaneity. <strong>Krishna</strong>’s life can give you a cue,<br />
a clue to know yourself <strong>and</strong> <strong>com</strong>e to yourself. If <strong>Krishna</strong> can flower, why not you? If <strong>Krishna</strong>’s selfnature<br />
can blossom, why should you go on withering <strong>and</strong> wasting as you do? If <strong>Krishna</strong> can laugh<br />
<strong>and</strong> sing <strong>and</strong> dance, why should you continue to shed tears <strong>and</strong> be miserable?<br />
It is not that you will dance the way <strong>Krishna</strong> dances. Your dance will be different, it will be your own;<br />
you will uncover your own innate dance. You don’t have to copy <strong>Krishna</strong>’s dance, you have only to<br />
know the law that helped him to find his dance <strong>and</strong> be fulfilled. <strong>Krishna</strong>’s life can help you in self<br />
discovery, which is of the highest. Self discovery, <strong>and</strong> not assimilation or imitation, is what you have<br />
to seek. And <strong>Krishna</strong>’s life can be of tremendous help in this adventure.<br />
So the first thing to know is that no one can be your ideal, not even <strong>Krishna</strong>. And you need not follow<br />
<strong>and</strong> imitate another, <strong>Krishna</strong> included.<br />
It is true that any number of people have wasted their lives following <strong>and</strong> imitating others. In reality,<br />
no one can wholly succeed in be<strong>com</strong>ing like another; it is impossible. You can impose another’s<br />
<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 412 <strong>Osho</strong>