24.04.2013 Views

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE RULE<br />

And Mahavira says that woman cannot achieve moksha or liberation unless she is reborn as a man.<br />

Buddha refuses to initiate them into his religion. And when <strong>Krishna</strong> Gautami persuades him to<br />

admit them in his sangha he makes a strange statement. He says, ”My religion was going to last<br />

five thous<strong>and</strong> years, but now that women have entered it will last only five hundred years.”<br />

Question 5<br />

QUESTIONER: THERE IS TRUTH IN THIS STATEMENT.<br />

This is not the question. This is not the question at all. <strong>The</strong>re is a relative truth in this statement;<br />

it is true from the side of Buddha. It is true from his side, because his path – or for that matter,<br />

Mahavira’s path – is not meant for women. Women don’t have much scope on Buddha’s path, which<br />

is male-oriented. Nonetheless women rush to them because they are so charismatic. So Buddha’s<br />

statement is relatively true in the context of his path, but it is not an absolute truth.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no difficulty for women in achieving moksha; they can achieve it as much as men can, but<br />

certainly their path will be different. <strong>The</strong>y cannot make it on the path of the Jaina tirthankara. It is<br />

like there are two pathways for going to a mountain, one of which is straight, steep <strong>and</strong> short with<br />

a sign on the entrance: Not For Women. And another is long, circular <strong>and</strong> flat with a sign at the<br />

beginning: For Women. This much is the difference.<br />

So the statement that women cannot achieve liberation is true in the context of Mahavira’s path or<br />

Buddha’s for that matter. If some woman insists on treading these male-oriented paths, she will<br />

surely have to wait for another incarnation as a man.<br />

Mahavira’s path is particularly steep <strong>and</strong> precipitous <strong>and</strong> hard, <strong>and</strong> there are good reasons for it.<br />

One important reason is that you have to go it alone, there is neither God nor any <strong>com</strong>panion to<br />

lean on in times of difficulty. And the psychological make-up of a woman is such that she needs<br />

someone’s shoulder – even a false shoulder – to lean on when in difficulty. She has a sense of<br />

assurance when a shoulder is available to lean on, a h<strong>and</strong> to hold. This is the way she is.<br />

But man’s way is different; he loves to be on his own. Dependence on others is alien to his nature;<br />

it fills him with self-pity. When a woman puts her h<strong>and</strong> in the h<strong>and</strong> of a man she feels assurance,<br />

strength, <strong>and</strong> dignity. Left alone she pities herself <strong>and</strong> feels forlorn <strong>and</strong> miserable.<br />

Question 6<br />

QUESTIONER: GANDHI USED TO WALK LEANING ON TWO WOMEN – ONE ON EACH SIDE.<br />

It is a different thing altogether, <strong>and</strong> I would like to discuss it later. This particular aspect of G<strong>and</strong>hi,<br />

walking with feminine support, deserves special consideration. He is perhaps the first man to do so.<br />

No man in the past had walked leaning on the shoulders of women.<br />

Question 7<br />

QUESTIONER: WAS IT BECAUSE HE WAS OLD?<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 394 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!