24.04.2013 Views

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE RULE<br />

from the bondage of desiring. So Buddha says over <strong>and</strong> over, ”Don’t choose, don’t seek, don’t run,<br />

don’t make something into a goal, because there is nothing like a goal, a destination. Everything is<br />

now <strong>and</strong> here.”<br />

Jesus has a goal, a destination. This is why, while he talks of holy indifference toward the world, he<br />

cannot be indifferent to God. Indifference to God cannot be holy in the eyes of Jesus, he will call it<br />

unholy indifference.<br />

Buddha is indifferent to everything; his indifference is <strong>com</strong>plete. If you ask him how it is that there is<br />

nothing to find – neither the world, nor God, nor soul, he will say, ”What we see before our eyes is not<br />

real, it is only a collage, an assemblage, something put together. It is something like a chariot which<br />

is nothing but a collection of four wheels <strong>and</strong> back seats, rods <strong>and</strong> ropes, <strong>and</strong> a horse that carries it.<br />

If you remove all the parts one by one <strong>and</strong> put them aside, the chariot will simply disappear.<br />

”Like the chariot you are a collage, the whole world is a collage, a collection, a <strong>com</strong>position of things,<br />

sights <strong>and</strong> sounds. And when the collage falls apart, then all that remains in its place is nothingness,<br />

emptiness. This nothingness, this emptiness is the reality, the truth which is worth attaining.” Buddha<br />

calls it nirvana – the ultimate state of extinction, nothingness, which cannot be put into words. So<br />

Buddha does not say it in words, he says it with his being, his interiority, his silence.<br />

For this reason only men <strong>and</strong> women of deep intelligence <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing can walk with Buddha.<br />

Those who are greedy <strong>and</strong> goal-oriented, who are out to achieve something – either gold or God –<br />

will simply run away from him. <strong>The</strong>y will say, ”This man Buddha is no good, he has nothing to give<br />

but peace. And what use is peace? We want heaven, we seek God, we yearn for MOKSHA.” And<br />

Buddha will simply laugh at them, because he knows that what they call God or soul or moksha is<br />

attained only in the immensity of peace, of silence.<br />

So one cannot make God into a goal. That is why Buddha consistently denies God, because if<br />

he accepts, you will immediately turn this into a goal, into an object of desire. And one who runs<br />

after a goal cannot be peaceful, he cannot be silent. So you can underst<strong>and</strong> why Buddha insists on<br />

indifference, it is only indifference that can lead you into peace, into the silence where all journeying<br />

ends.<br />

Mahavira’s transcendence of attachment ac. cords with Buddha’s indifference to some extent,<br />

because he too st<strong>and</strong>s for indifference toward the world. In the same way Mahavira agrees with<br />

Jesus to an extent because he, like Jesus, st<strong>and</strong>s for liberation. Mahavira is not choiceless in<br />

regard to the goal of freedom. Mahavira will argue that without liberation, peace is irrelevant; without<br />

freedom there is no difference between peace <strong>and</strong> lack of peace. <strong>The</strong>n restless ness is as good as<br />

peace <strong>and</strong> silence.<br />

Mahavira says that someone gives up a thing so he can gain something else in its place. If there<br />

is nothing to be gained the question of renunciation does not arise. So Mahavira is not indifferent<br />

to moksha, or freedom. <strong>His</strong> transcendence of attachment is a means to help you go beyond the<br />

contradictions <strong>and</strong> conflicts of the world; so it is only an instrument of achievement.<br />

Buddha’s indifference is total. It has no goals to achieve, it is not goal oriented. Or you can say<br />

Buddha’s indifference is a means to non-achievement, where you lose <strong>and</strong> go on losing till there is<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 378 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!