24.04.2013 Views

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT AVERSION<br />

<strong>The</strong> truth is that friendship always happens between persons of opposite orientations. <strong>The</strong> opposite<br />

attracts, is the rule. <strong>The</strong> more opposite two per sons are, the deeper their friendship. In fact,<br />

opposites are not really opposites, they are <strong>com</strong>plementary to each other. Because of it you will<br />

rarely find two equally intelligent persons making friends; if they do they will only quarrel <strong>and</strong> wrangle<br />

over every conceivable issue. An intelligent person will find a stupid partner to join him in friendship,<br />

so they <strong>com</strong>plement each other.<br />

Two powerful persons will not make friends; not even two persons having the same skills. You will<br />

rarely <strong>com</strong>e across two poets or two painters as intimate friends. If two poets be<strong>com</strong>e friends,<br />

the cause of friendship will be something other than poetry. Maybe they drink together or gamble<br />

together, but then it is association <strong>and</strong> not friendship.<br />

Psychologists believe if there is intimate friendship between two men, deep down it is a homosexual<br />

relationship. Similarly they think any such intimacy between two women to be homosexual. You will<br />

find it difficult to agree with the psychologists, but there is some element of truth in what they say.<br />

It has been observed that more or less everyone misses the intimate friendship of his early years<br />

for the test of his life, because there is a phase of homosexual relationship in everyone’s life in his<br />

adolescence. Before they get interested in the opposite sex boys get interested in boys <strong>and</strong> girls in<br />

girls. In fact, before they attain sexual maturity there is not much difference between a boy <strong>and</strong> a<br />

girl as far as sex is concerned. So boys be<strong>com</strong>e interested in boys <strong>and</strong> girls in girls. For this reason<br />

friendships struck in the early years are so enduring.<br />

After they attain sexual maturity, boys <strong>and</strong> girls who are psychologically natural <strong>and</strong> normal begin<br />

to take interest in the opposite sex. <strong>The</strong>n they be<strong>com</strong>e what psychologists call heterosexual.<br />

Old relationships are forgotten <strong>and</strong> new intimacies with the opposite sex begin to build up. Of<br />

course, about twenty to thirty percent of young men <strong>and</strong> women remain fixed at their adolescence,<br />

which means their psychological age is stuck at fourteen years. It means they are not growing<br />

psychologically; they are stunted <strong>and</strong> sick <strong>and</strong> need psychotherapy.<br />

If a young woman of twenty-five continues to be interested in members of her own sex, if she<br />

refuses to take interest in some young men, there is certainly something wrong with her psyche <strong>and</strong><br />

she needs treatment. It does not mean that now they will not enter into friendship with any members<br />

of their own sex; they will – but it will be a kind of association, it can. not be real friendship. Two<br />

men or women will be friends if they ate members of the same club – say the Rotary Club, or if they<br />

subscribe to the same political ideology – say <strong>com</strong>munism, or they are disciples of the same guru.<br />

But these relationships can never have the depth <strong>and</strong> intimacy of the early years.<br />

<strong>The</strong> opposite has great attraction. Look at it from some different angles. Often lovers of good clothes<br />

are attracted by a naked fakir; lovers of delicious dishes be<strong>com</strong>e disciples of a master who is known<br />

for fasting. It is ironic that the followers of a renunciate saint <strong>com</strong>prise those who are known for<br />

their indulgence. It is deserving of serious consideration that while Mahavira, the founder of Jainism<br />

remained naked, most of the Jainas chose to sell clothes – <strong>and</strong> they have been selling clothes down<br />

the centuries. Fot sure, people who loved good clothes were attracted by the nude Mahavira <strong>and</strong><br />

they became his followers. It is surprising but true that Mahavira renounced a kingdom <strong>and</strong> became<br />

a beggar, <strong>and</strong> the Jainas are the richest <strong>com</strong>munity in India.<br />

This is not accidental; there is a sound reason behind it. When Mahavira renounced his kingdom<br />

<strong>and</strong> wealth – he really gave away every bit of his pos sessions to the poor before he left for the forest<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 355 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!