24.04.2013 Views

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT AVERSION<br />

Non-attachment is altogether different; it is freedom from both the positive <strong>and</strong> the negative kinds<br />

of attachment. Non-attachment means one is neither attached to something nor averse to it. Nonattachment<br />

is transcendence of both attachment <strong>and</strong> aversion.<br />

In the world of spiritualism there are many words like non-attachment, which have been badly<br />

distorted <strong>and</strong> misconstrued. Veetrag is one such word which means transcendence of attachment,<br />

but it has be<strong>com</strong>e synonymous with aversion. When someone goes beyond both attachment <strong>and</strong><br />

aversion, he achieves the state of veetrag or transcendence. This word veetrag belongs to the<br />

tradition of Mahavira, while anasakti belongs to the tradition of <strong>Krishna</strong>, <strong>and</strong> they are synonymous.<br />

But there is a difference in the approach of the two.<br />

While Mahavira attains to the state of veetrag by renouncing both attachment <strong>and</strong> aversion, <strong>Krishna</strong><br />

attains to the state of anasakti by accepting both positive <strong>and</strong> negative attachments. And these are<br />

the only possible ways. While their ends remain the same, their means are different. While Mahavira<br />

insists on renunciation of attachment, <strong>Krishna</strong> emphasizes its acceptance. So in a deeper sense<br />

veetrag is negative <strong>and</strong> anasakti is positive.<br />

A non-attached mind, according to <strong>Krishna</strong>, is one who accepts everything unconditionally. <strong>The</strong><br />

interesting thing is that if you accept something totally it does not leave a mark, a scar on your mind;<br />

your mind remains unscathed <strong>and</strong> undisturbed. But when you cling strongly to a thing it leaves a<br />

mark on your mind. And when you are strongly averse to something you detest <strong>and</strong> deny it, then<br />

also it leaves a mark on your mind.<br />

But when you neither cling to a thing nor run away from it, when you be<strong>com</strong>e receptive to everything<br />

– good or bad, beautiful or ugly, pleasant or painful – when you be<strong>com</strong>e like a mirror reflecting<br />

everything that <strong>com</strong>es before it, then your mind remains unscathed <strong>and</strong> unmarked. And such a<br />

mind is a non-attached mind; it is established in non-attachment.<br />

You want to know how an ordinary person can achieve non-attachment. In fact, everyone is ordinary<br />

until he attains to non-attachment. So the question how an ordinary person can be<strong>com</strong>e nonattached<br />

does not arise. As long as one is attached or averse to something he remains an ordinary<br />

person. Extraordinariness <strong>com</strong>es with non-attachment, not before. It is not that ordinary people<br />

<strong>com</strong>e to non-attachment in one way <strong>and</strong> extraordinary ones <strong>com</strong>e to it in another way. Only one<br />

who has transcended both attachment <strong>and</strong> aversion is extraordinary. So the right question to ask is:<br />

How can one attain to non-attachment?<br />

Before we go into the question of non-attach ment, let us underst<strong>and</strong> the matter of attachment itself.<br />

How is it that one ceases to be non-attached <strong>and</strong> be<strong>com</strong>es attached to persons, things <strong>and</strong> ideas?<br />

According to <strong>Krishna</strong>, non-attachment is embedded in the very nature of a human being, in his<br />

very being. Non-attachment is our basic nature, our original face. So the real question is how one<br />

deviates from his nature. We ,don’t have to practice non attachment, we don’t have to do something<br />

to <strong>com</strong>e to it. We have only to know how we have gone astray from our nature. This is our basic<br />

question.<br />

Someone came to me the other day <strong>and</strong> said, ”I want to find God.” I asked him when <strong>and</strong> how he<br />

had lost his God. <strong>His</strong> answer was that he had never lost him.<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 337 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!