24.04.2013 Views

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 17. DON’T IMITATE, JUST BE YOURSELF<br />

QUESTIONER: THERE ARE TWO SIDES TO THE LIFE OF EVERY GREAT MAN. WHILE<br />

ONE SIDE IS PERSONAL AND PRIVATE, THE OTHER IS OPEN, PUBLIC. THESE FEW DAYS<br />

THAT YOU HAVE BEEN TALKING TO US ABOUT KRISHNA, WE HAVE BEEN HELPED TO<br />

UNDERSTAND SOME FEATURES OF HIS LIFE WHICH ARE SUCH THAT IF WE TRY TO IMITATE<br />

HIM TODAY WE WILL AT ONCE BE OSTRACIZED BY THE SOCIETY. WE CANNOT PLAY<br />

PRANKS WITH OUR GIRLFRIENDS IN THE STREETS; WE CANNOT RUN AWAY WITH THEIR<br />

CLOTHES WHILE THEY ARE BATHING IN A SWIMMING POOL; WE CANNOT DANCE WITH<br />

OUR RADHAS AS KRISHNA DANCES WITH HIS RADHA WHO IS HIS GIRLFRIEND, NOT HIS<br />

WIFE – EVEN IF WE ARE DEEP IN LOVE WITH THEM. BUT ANOTHER SIDE OF KRISHNA’S<br />

LIFE IS ABOVE-BOARD. HIS SAYINGS HAVE TREMENDOUS RELEVANCE FOR ALL TIMES –<br />

PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE. AND IT IS IN THIS CONTEXT THAT WE REQUEST YOU TO<br />

SHED LIGHT ON HIS PHILOSOPHY OF LIFE, ON HIS DISCIPLINE OF WORK, KNOWLEDGE<br />

AND NON-ATTACHMENT, AND HIS ART OF LIVING, SO THAT WE CAN EMULATE HIM IN OUR<br />

DAY TO DAY LIFE.<br />

Don’t think that only in the present it is difficult to play the role of <strong>Krishna</strong>; it was difficult in <strong>Krishna</strong>’s<br />

own times. Otherwise there would have been not only one, but any number of <strong>Krishna</strong>s. And if<br />

it seems difficult for you today to be<strong>com</strong>e <strong>Krishna</strong>-like, know that it would have been as difficult in<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>’s time if you were his contemporaries. And for <strong>Krishna</strong> it would be as easy to be a <strong>Krishna</strong><br />

today – if he were born again – as it was in his own days. But this illusion stems from our idea<br />

<strong>and</strong> habit of following <strong>and</strong> imitating others in every way. In fact, imitation is the beginning of all our<br />

problems.<br />

You could never have imitated <strong>Krishna</strong> if you lived in his days, nor can you imitate him now. It is<br />

impossible. And if you do, you are right in saying that you will end up in a mess.<br />

I have been talking on <strong>Krishna</strong>’s life <strong>and</strong> philosophy not so that you will make him your ideal <strong>and</strong><br />

imitate him. Nothing is farther from me than the idea of imitation. If we can underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>Krishna</strong>’s<br />

life, it will help us to underst<strong>and</strong> our own life in its right perspective. If we fully unfold <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>’s life, which is vast <strong>and</strong> multidimensional, it will enable us to unfold our own life <strong>and</strong> know it.<br />

But you will never underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>Krishna</strong> if you think in terms of imitating him.<br />

If we imitate someone or other, we will never underst<strong>and</strong> him because of that. And we will never<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> our own life. In fact, the reason we want to imitate someone is that we don’t want to<br />

take the trouble of underst<strong>and</strong>ing ourselves. It is convenient to live in somebody else’s shadow<br />

<strong>and</strong> imitate him; it is a way to escape the arduous task of underst<strong>and</strong>ing ourselves. Underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

begins when someone ceases to imitate others, to be like others, when he wants to know directly<br />

who he is <strong>and</strong> what he can be.<br />

<strong>The</strong> life of one who has achieved his full unfoldment helps to underst<strong>and</strong> one’s own life. It doesn’t<br />

mean that one be<strong>com</strong>es like him, be<strong>com</strong>es his carbon copy. To be<strong>com</strong>e like others is neither<br />

possible nor desirable. Everyone is different <strong>and</strong> will remain different.<br />

If you think in terms of imitation when we are discussing <strong>Krishna</strong> – <strong>and</strong> it seems from your question<br />

that you do think in such terms – then you will never underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>Krishna</strong>. Never mind <strong>Krishna</strong>, you<br />

will never underst<strong>and</strong> yourselves.<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 330 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!