Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com
Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com
CHAPTER 17. DON’T IMITATE, JUST BE YOURSELF Firstly, Krishna declares himself to be the best among all things – of all the seasons he is the spring, of all the cows he is the kamdhenu, of all the elephants he is the eirawat. And secondly – and this is more significant – he finds his peers even among the lowliest of creatures like cows and horses. Both things should be taken together. While he declares himself to be the best among different classes of creatures, he does not distinguish between one class and another. Even when he claims to be the eirawat among elephants, he remains nonetheless an elephant. Even when he claims to be the best among the cows he remains a cow. Similarly he is quite at home among snakes and reptiles. He does not exclude the meanest categories as you think. He chooses to be the best even among the meanest creatures of this universe. And there is a reason. But why does he declare him self to be the best and the greatest among us all? On the surface it seems to us to be an egoistic declaration, because we are so much involved with our egos that everything we see appears egoistic. But if we go deep into it we will know what a great message is enshrined in Krishna’s declaration. When he says that he is the eirawat among the elephants, he means to say every elephant is destined to be an eirawat, and if one fails to be eirawat he fails to actualize his best and highest potential. Similarly every season has the potential to grow into a spring, and if one fails to attain to the highest in its nature, it fails its nature. And if a cow fails to be the kamdhenu, it means she has gone astray from her nature. In all these declarations, Krishna says only one thing: that he is the culmination, the perfection of nature in everything. Whoever and whatever attains to the sublime reflects godliness. This is the central message of this declaration. Please understand its deeper significance. It is not that an elephant who does not become the eirawat is not a Krishna, he too is a Krishna, but a backward Krishna; he has failed to be the eirawat which is his potential. Krishna says he reflects the innate potentiality of each being come to its completion, that each being can grow into Krishnahood, god-hood. Krishna symbolizes the actualized form at its best, the highest of each one’s possibility. Every being, every thing is capable of attaining to Krishna-hood. And if one fails to realize himself fully, it simply meanS that he has betrayed his innate nature, he has deviated from it. There is not even a trace of egoism in Krishna’s declaration. This is his way of saying that one cannot attain to godliness unless he becomes like the lion among animals, like the spring among the seasons, like the Ganges among the rivers. One comes to God only when one attains to one’s own fullest flowering, not otherwise. By way of these illustrations Krishna persuades Arjuna that if he flowers to the maximum as a warrior – which is his innate nature – he will be. come a Krishna in his own right. Had Krishna been born two thousand years later he would have said, ”I am Arjuna among the warrior.” When Krishna declares his being, he is not claiming greatness. To claim greatness he need not compare himself with beasts and birds, snakes and reptiles. Claims to greatness can be made directly, but Krishna really does not claim any greatness for himself. He Is speaking about a law of growth, a universal law which is that when you draw out the best in you, when you actualize your highest potential you become God. One of the Sanskrit names of God Is Ishwar, which Is derived from aishwarya, meaning affluence. It means when you attain to the peak of affluence as a being, you become God. But we never pay attention to this aspect of godliness, which is affluence in every respect. So to be the lion among the animals, the kamdhenu among the cows, and the spring among the seasons is to attain to godliness, Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy 328 Osho
CHAPTER 17. DON’T IMITATE, JUST BE YOURSELF to God. When there is no difference whatsoever between your potentiality and actuality, you become God. When the highest possibility of your life is actualized you attain to Godhood. If there is a distance between your potential and actual states of being, it means you are yet on the way to your destiny. And godliness is everybody’s destiny; it is really everyone’s birthright. When that which is hidden in you becomes manifest, you are God. Right now you are part hidden and part manifest, you are on the way to flowering. You have yet to burst into a full spring, you have yet to become God. If Krishna happens to visit our garden here and says that he is the most blossomed one among all the flowers of this garden, what does he mean by it? He means to say that other flowers have the potential to achieve this flowering, and they are on the way to it. It is right that Krishna does not relate himself with flowers yet hidden in their buds or in their seeds. He connects himself only with those that have fully flowered. And there is a reason for it. He is speaking to Arjuna who is depressed and confused, and he is not only trying to revive him but also to inspire him to blossom fully as a warrior, to actualize his potential as a warrior. Then alone, Krishna says, can he attain to God, to the utmost peak. Here Krishna is having to play a double role. Because Arjuna is his friend, he cannot be too hard with him. He has to speak as a friend but all the time he is aware that he has to help Arjuna to come to the same flowering of being which he embodies in himself. Therefore, from time to time he gives glimpses of his own flowering, of his own fullness, so that these glimpses gently seep into Arjuna’s awareness. Krishna will be of no use to Arjuna if he re mains only his friend, but if he reveals his godliness indiscriminately, Arjuna may be so frightened that he runs away. So all the time he has to strike a balance between the two roles he is playing. While he continues to be Arjuna’s friend he also declares his godliness from time to time. Whenever he finds Arjuna is relaxed, he declares his godliness. And when Arjuna is assailed with doubt and confusion he returns to his friendly approach. His task is very delicate, and very few Buddhas have had to deal with such a situation as Krishna faces in the war of the Mahabharat. Bud&a does not have to deal with such a delicate situation. He knows his people clearly; he knows who is who and what they want. His people have come to sit at his feet to learn truth from him, so communication with them is easy and straight. Mahavira too, has no such difficulties with his listeners. Krishna’s difficulty with Arjuna is real, he has to play a double role. It is really difficult to teach a friend, to be his teacher It is difficult even to be an advisor to an intimate friend. If you try he will say, ”Shut up, don’t show off your wisdom.” Arjuna can say to Krishna, ”Keep your sage advices to yourself, I know how much you know, since we have grown together from child. hood.” Arjuna can run away in such a situation. So Krishna on the one hand placates him with phrases like ”O great warrior,” and on the other he tells him ”You are an ignoramus, you don’t know the reality.” If you bear in mind this aspect of the GEETA, you will have no difficulty understanding it. Question 3 Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy 329 Osho
- Page 277 and 278: CHAPTER 14. ACTION, INACTION AND NO
- Page 279 and 280: CHAPTER 14. ACTION, INACTION AND NO
- Page 281 and 282: CHAPTER 14. ACTION, INACTION AND NO
- Page 283 and 284: 2 October 1970 pm in Question 1 CHA
- Page 285 and 286: CHAPTER 15. LIFE AFTER DEATH AND RE
- Page 287 and 288: CHAPTER 15. LIFE AFTER DEATH AND RE
- Page 289 and 290: CHAPTER 15. LIFE AFTER DEATH AND RE
- Page 291 and 292: CHAPTER 15. LIFE AFTER DEATH AND RE
- Page 293 and 294: CHAPTER 15. LIFE AFTER DEATH AND RE
- Page 295 and 296: CHAPTER 15. LIFE AFTER DEATH AND RE
- Page 297 and 298: CHAPTER 15. LIFE AFTER DEATH AND RE
- Page 299 and 300: CHAPTER 15. LIFE AFTER DEATH AND RE
- Page 301 and 302: CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REA
- Page 303 and 304: CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REA
- Page 305 and 306: CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REA
- Page 307 and 308: CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REA
- Page 309 and 310: CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REA
- Page 311 and 312: CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REA
- Page 313 and 314: CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REA
- Page 315 and 316: CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REA
- Page 317 and 318: CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REA
- Page 319 and 320: CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REA
- Page 321 and 322: CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REA
- Page 323 and 324: 3 October 1970 pm in Question 1 CHA
- Page 325 and 326: CHAPTER 17. DON’T IMITATE, JUST B
- Page 327: CHAPTER 17. DON’T IMITATE, JUST B
- Page 331 and 332: CHAPTER 17. DON’T IMITATE, JUST B
- Page 333 and 334: CHAPTER 17. DON’T IMITATE, JUST B
- Page 335 and 336: CHAPTER 17. DON’T IMITATE, JUST B
- Page 337 and 338: CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT A
- Page 339 and 340: CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT A
- Page 341 and 342: CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT A
- Page 343 and 344: CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT A
- Page 345 and 346: CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT A
- Page 347 and 348: CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT A
- Page 349 and 350: CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT A
- Page 351 and 352: CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT A
- Page 353 and 354: CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT A
- Page 355 and 356: CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT A
- Page 357 and 358: CHAPTER 18. NON-ATTACHMENT IS NOT A
- Page 359 and 360: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 361 and 362: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 363 and 364: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 365 and 366: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 367 and 368: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 369 and 370: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 371 and 372: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 373 and 374: CHAPTER 19. RITUALS, FIRE AND KNOWL
- Page 375 and 376: 5 October 1970 am in Question 1 CHA
- Page 377 and 378: CHAPTER 20. BASE YOUR RULE ON THE R
CHAPTER 17. DON’T IMITATE, JUST BE YOURSELF<br />
Firstly, <strong>Krishna</strong> declares himself to be the best among all things – of all the seasons he is the spring,<br />
of all the cows he is the kamdhenu, of all the elephants he is the eirawat. And secondly – <strong>and</strong> this<br />
is more significant – he finds his peers even among the lowliest of creatures like cows <strong>and</strong> horses.<br />
Both things should be taken together. While he declares himself to be the best among different<br />
classes of creatures, he does not distinguish between one class <strong>and</strong> another. Even when he claims<br />
to be the eirawat among elephants, he remains nonetheless an elephant. Even when he claims to<br />
be the best among the cows he remains a cow. Similarly he is quite at home among snakes <strong>and</strong><br />
reptiles. He does not exclude the meanest categories as you think. He chooses to be the best even<br />
among the meanest creatures of this universe. And there is a reason. But why does he declare him<br />
self to be the best <strong>and</strong> the greatest among us all?<br />
On the surface it seems to us to be an egoistic declaration, because we are so much involved<br />
with our egos that everything we see appears egoistic. But if we go deep into it we will know what a<br />
great message is enshrined in <strong>Krishna</strong>’s declaration. When he says that he is the eirawat among the<br />
elephants, he means to say every elephant is destined to be an eirawat, <strong>and</strong> if one fails to be eirawat<br />
he fails to actualize his best <strong>and</strong> highest potential. Similarly every season has the potential to grow<br />
into a spring, <strong>and</strong> if one fails to attain to the highest in its nature, it fails its nature. And if a cow fails to<br />
be the kamdhenu, it means she has gone astray from her nature. In all these declarations, <strong>Krishna</strong><br />
says only one thing: that he is the culmination, the perfection of nature in everything. Whoever <strong>and</strong><br />
whatever attains to the sublime reflects godliness. This is the central message of this declaration.<br />
Please underst<strong>and</strong> its deeper significance.<br />
It is not that an elephant who does not be<strong>com</strong>e the eirawat is not a <strong>Krishna</strong>, he too is a <strong>Krishna</strong>, but a<br />
backward <strong>Krishna</strong>; he has failed to be the eirawat which is his potential. <strong>Krishna</strong> says he reflects the<br />
innate potentiality of each being <strong>com</strong>e to its <strong>com</strong>pletion, that each being can grow into <strong>Krishna</strong>hood,<br />
god-hood. <strong>Krishna</strong> symbolizes the actualized form at its best, the highest of each one’s possibility.<br />
Every being, every thing is capable of attaining to <strong>Krishna</strong>-hood. And if one fails to realize himself<br />
fully, it simply meanS that he has betrayed his innate nature, he has deviated from it. <strong>The</strong>re is not<br />
even a trace of egoism in <strong>Krishna</strong>’s declaration. This is his way of saying that one cannot attain<br />
to godliness unless he be<strong>com</strong>es like the lion among animals, like the spring among the seasons,<br />
like the Ganges among the rivers. One <strong>com</strong>es to God only when one attains to one’s own fullest<br />
flowering, not otherwise.<br />
By way of these illustrations <strong>Krishna</strong> persuades Arjuna that if he flowers to the maximum as a warrior<br />
– which is his innate nature – he will be. <strong>com</strong>e a <strong>Krishna</strong> in his own right. Had <strong>Krishna</strong> been born<br />
two thous<strong>and</strong> years later he would have said, ”I am Arjuna among the warrior.”<br />
When <strong>Krishna</strong> declares his being, he is not claiming greatness. To claim greatness he need not<br />
<strong>com</strong>pare himself with beasts <strong>and</strong> birds, snakes <strong>and</strong> reptiles. Claims to greatness can be made<br />
directly, but <strong>Krishna</strong> really does not claim any greatness for himself. He Is speaking about a law of<br />
growth, a universal law which is that when you draw out the best in you, when you actualize your<br />
highest potential you be<strong>com</strong>e God.<br />
One of the Sanskrit names of God Is Ishwar, which Is derived from aishwarya, meaning affluence.<br />
It means when you attain to the peak of affluence as a being, you be<strong>com</strong>e God. But we never pay<br />
attention to this aspect of godliness, which is affluence in every respect. So to be the lion among the<br />
animals, the kamdhenu among the cows, <strong>and</strong> the spring among the seasons is to attain to godliness,<br />
<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 328 <strong>Osho</strong>