24.04.2013 Views

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 17. DON’T IMITATE, JUST BE YOURSELF<br />

it was really corrupt <strong>and</strong> rotten. To say a word in favor of these old scriptures was tantamount<br />

to providing support to a decadent <strong>and</strong> rotting tradition. Knowing well that the Vedas <strong>and</strong> the<br />

UPANISHADS contained the same truth, Buddha could not take their support. Because it was<br />

with their support that a monster of falsehoods, superstitions <strong>and</strong> crass hypocrisy was stalking the<br />

l<strong>and</strong>, mercilessly exploiting <strong>and</strong> oppressing the people. That is why he kept quiet about them.<br />

It is not that Buddha is not aware that the Vedas <strong>and</strong> UPANISHADS contain the truth. But it<br />

often happens in history that when a new Buddha <strong>com</strong>es he has to fight <strong>and</strong> uproot many old<br />

truths, because being old they get so badly mixed up with falsehoods that to support them would<br />

automatically strengthen those lies.<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong> did not have to face such a situation. In his time the tradition of the Vedas <strong>and</strong> the<br />

UPANISHADS was very much alive. It was really at the height of its glory, absolutely unpolluted<br />

<strong>and</strong> pure. For this very reason we say <strong>Krishna</strong>’s Geeta is the quintessence of the Vedas <strong>and</strong> the<br />

UPANISHADS. In fact, we can say <strong>Krishna</strong> himself is the embodiment of the great culture which had<br />

<strong>com</strong>e out of these scriptures. <strong>Krishna</strong> reflects all that is essential <strong>and</strong> basic to that culture; he <strong>com</strong>es<br />

at a time when the Vedic civilization was at its zenith. Buddha <strong>com</strong>es when it had touched its nadir.<br />

It was the same culture, but Buddha had to witness its utter decadence <strong>and</strong> degradation, when the<br />

brahmins had ceased to be knowers of truth <strong>and</strong> instead were busy exploiting people in the name<br />

of God <strong>and</strong> religion. Every conceivable filth <strong>and</strong> ugliness, corruption <strong>and</strong> depravity had entered this<br />

culture, which now had nothing to do with religion.<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong> represents the summit of UPANISHADIC teachings. In his times the UPANISHADS have<br />

touched the pinnacle of attainment <strong>and</strong> splendor. <strong>The</strong> light of knowledge emanating from them is<br />

spreading in all directions, <strong>and</strong> their perfume is everywhere in the air. <strong>The</strong> UPANISHADS are not a<br />

dead thing, they are fully alive <strong>and</strong> youthful <strong>and</strong> their music can be heard even in the bushes <strong>and</strong><br />

shrubs of the l<strong>and</strong>. So when <strong>Krishna</strong> talks about them, he is not talking about something old <strong>and</strong><br />

dead; he is talking about something which is in the prime of its youth.<br />

But by the time Buddha <strong>com</strong>es, twenty-five hundred years after <strong>Krishna</strong>, the whole tradition is dying<br />

<strong>and</strong> rotting, only its corpse is Lying before him. Clearly, Buddha cannot invoke their support. It is not<br />

out of any arrogance that he declares his truth on his own.<br />

At the same time there is nothing egoistic about <strong>Krishna</strong> when he seeks the support of the old seers<br />

<strong>and</strong> their sayings.<br />

Question 2<br />

QUESTIONER: KRISHNA, IN CHAPTER TEN OF THE GEETA DESCRIBES HIMSELF TO BE THE<br />

GANGES AMONG THE RIVERS, THE SPRING AMONG THE SEASONS, THE LION AMONG<br />

THE BEASTS, THE GARUDA OR EAGLE AMONG THE BIRDS, THE EIRAWAT AMONG THE<br />

ELEPHANTS, THE KAMDHENU AMONG THE COWS, VASUKI AMONG THE SNAKES, AND SO<br />

ON. DOES IT MEAN THAT HE IS TRYING TO DECLARE HIMSELF TO BE THE BEST AND THE<br />

GREATEST IN ALL CREATION? DOES IT ALSO MEAN THAT HE REFUSES TO REPRESENT<br />

ALL THAT IS LOWLY AND BASE? WHY DOES HE EXCLUDE THE MEANEST OF US ALL? AND<br />

WHERE DOES THE MEANEST BELONG?<br />

It is a significant question. And there are two beautiful aspects to it.<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 327 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!