Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

oshorajneesh.com
from oshorajneesh.com More from this publisher
24.04.2013 Views

CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REALITY to go to his village on some urgent business. Since Mahavira is in silence, he cannot say yes or no, but the cowherd takes his silence as his consent and hurries away to his village. On his return he is shocked to find that all his cows have disappeared, while Mahavira is standing there as before. The cowherd believes his cows have been stolen with the connivance of this man who is now pretending to be deaf by not answering his questions. He curses Mahavira and beats him mercilessly; he even sticks an iron rod into his ears, telling him, ”You are pretending deafness – so have it for good.” Mahavira does not say a word; he remains standing motionless and silent. Legend has it that Indra, king of the gods, comes to Mahavira and offers protection but Mahavira declines the offer. This Indra is not a person, he is one of the bodiless souls who is grieved to see an innocent and defenseless person like Mahavira being tortured. But Mahavira emphatically says ”no” to Indra. It is amusing that the one who does not say a word to the cowherd torturing him, says ”no” to Indra. In fact this dialogue between Indra and Mahavira takes place at some inner level where Mahavira has received Indra’s message psychically. If he spoke to Indra, he could have also talked to the cowherd and explained his situation. But he maintains his vow of silence in spite of all the tortures he is subjected to. His vow of silence is for twelve years. Evidently he does not have to refuse Indra verbally – it is an inner dialogue, that can be carried without words and language. There are such channels of esoteric communication where neither words nor sense organs are needed. Mahavira’s followers have been in difficulty explaining this episode. But it is quite possible. There are bodiless souls who can communicate with us astrally and without words. Mahavira is reported to have said to Indra, ”No, if I agree to be protected by you I will lose my freedom. Leave me undefended so my freedom re mains intact. Your help will surely bind me to you, and I don’t want bondage even in return for my protection.” Mahavira means to say that the cowherd will not do him as much harm as Indra’s protection because it will bind him with the king of gods. Tortures inflicted on him by a keeper of cows will not bind him in any way, but the security provided by Indra certainly will. He would not like to give up his freedom at any cost. Another legend says when Gautam Siddhartha first attained to Buddhahood, gods came to greet him. Buddha did not say a word for seven days after his enlightenment – as if he had lost his voice. It happens often when one attains to the supreme knowledge; he loses his speech. It is easy to speak in a state of ignorance. When one does not know the truth he has no sense of responsibility for what he says; he can say anything he likes. There is no difficulty in speaking about something we don’t know, because we are not afraid of being wrong. But when one comes to truth, he becomes speechless, because truth cannot be said. So when Buddha became Buddha, he kept absolutely silent for seven days, and it is said the gods became disturbed and implored him to resume speak ing. It would be calamitous for mankind, the gods thought, if Buddha did not share his priceless wisdom with those who needed it. It is after millenia that a man like him is born on this planet. ”Pray, speak for the sake of the suffering humanity,” the gods begged him. These gods are bodiless souls, not persons. They are highly evolved souls, aware that what Buddha has achieved is rare. And fortunately for the world he is in a human body, so he is in a position to Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy 310 Osho

CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REALITY communicate with the world. The gods cannot communicate, they lack bodies. Gods also know what Buddha has known, and they are anxious to communicate it to the world, but they are helpless. Here is a person who has known the ultimate truth and is still in his body and in the world. And it is only rarely that a member of the human race stumbles upon the ultimate truth. Therefore these bodiless souls insist that Buddha must speak, and speak without any further delay. And with great difficulty they succeed in persuading Buddha to speak, and they rejoice at their success. But these astral souls are not going to use Buddha as their medium. It is not that Buddha will convey their message to the world. Buddha has his own message, his own speech. What Alice Bailey says is right. But it is difficult for her to assert that what she says is right because she is only a medium, the messages belong to somebody else. A medium can say only this much; the messages are received at the level of his inner space. But he cannot claim that whatever he receives is right, that it is not his own mind game, a trick of his unconscious. A medium cannot assert that he is not a victim of self-deception, because countless people are deceived by their own unconscious into believing that they are mediums of great souls or gods. It is really hard for a medium to assert his authenticity, and the psychologists can easily corner Alice Bailey. And lastly you want to know if I am in contact with any such masters. No, I don’t believe in borrowing knowledge. I am not in contact with any of these masters; I stand wholly on my own. What I am saying, right or wrong, is my thing, and I am wholly responsible for it. I have nothing to do with any bodiless masters. And if I accept someone as my master, then there is every danger of my becoming somebody’s master in turn. I don’t indulge in such games. I am no one’s disciple, nor do I want to be anyone’s master. Therefore I say only that which I know, and I am not interested in the masters. If I speak about them it is only in passing, and by way of reference. I have nothing to do with their authenticity or otherwise. All I want to say in this context is that there are both good and evil souls; good souls are known as gods and evil souls as ghosts. In the West these gods are known as masters: the word ”master” has become a synonym for god in the current use in the West. These gods have always sent messages, and they continue to do so. Similarly, even evil souls send messages; they are also looking out for suitable mediums. If ever you are in a frame of mind that suits the evil souls, they will not fail to utilize you. Many times people do things they would not do on their own. They become just instruments in the hands of evil spirits. So when a murderer swears before a judge that he committed the crime in spite of himself, he is not necessarily Lying. It is possible. There are spirits that use people to commit heinous crimes on their behalf. There are buildings all over the world haunted by evil spirits, and if you go to live in them you will be compelled to commit murders at their behest. Feuds and vendettas are carried on not only from one generation to another, but also from one life to another. A young man was brought to me recently. The house he has been living in was bought three years ago. And ever since, a process of deterioration in his personality set in and by and by he became a different man altogether. Before coming to this house this young man was known for being very gentle and meek; now he is arrogant and haughty, irritable and violent – ready to fight at the slightest provocation. This metamorphosis, this mutation in his personality took place the very day he entered Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy 311 Osho

CHAPTER 16. ATHEISM, THEISM AND REALITY<br />

<strong>com</strong>municate with the world. <strong>The</strong> gods cannot <strong>com</strong>municate, they lack bodies. Gods also know what<br />

Buddha has known, <strong>and</strong> they are anxious to <strong>com</strong>municate it to the world, but they are helpless. Here<br />

is a person who has known the ultimate truth <strong>and</strong> is still in his body <strong>and</strong> in the world. And it is only<br />

rarely that a member of the human race stumbles upon the ultimate truth. <strong>The</strong>refore these bodiless<br />

souls insist that Buddha must speak, <strong>and</strong> speak without any further delay. And with great difficulty<br />

they succeed in persuading Buddha to speak, <strong>and</strong> they rejoice at their success.<br />

But these astral souls are not going to use Buddha as their medium. It is not that Buddha will convey<br />

their message to the world. Buddha has his own message, his own speech.<br />

What Alice Bailey says is right. But it is difficult for her to assert that what she says is right because<br />

she is only a medium, the messages belong to somebody else. A medium can say only this much;<br />

the messages are received at the level of his inner space. But he cannot claim that whatever he<br />

receives is right, that it is not his own mind game, a trick of his unconscious. A medium cannot<br />

assert that he is not a victim of self-deception, because countless people are deceived by their<br />

own unconscious into believing that they are mediums of great souls or gods. It is really hard for a<br />

medium to assert his authenticity, <strong>and</strong> the psychologists can easily corner Alice Bailey.<br />

And lastly you want to know if I am in contact with any such masters.<br />

No, I don’t believe in borrowing knowledge. I am not in contact with any of these masters; I st<strong>and</strong><br />

wholly on my own. What I am saying, right or wrong, is my thing, <strong>and</strong> I am wholly responsible for it.<br />

I have nothing to do with any bodiless masters. And if I accept someone as my master, then there<br />

is every danger of my be<strong>com</strong>ing somebody’s master in turn. I don’t indulge in such games. I am no<br />

one’s disciple, nor do I want to be anyone’s master. <strong>The</strong>refore I say only that which I know, <strong>and</strong> I am<br />

not interested in the masters. If I speak about them it is only in passing, <strong>and</strong> by way of reference. I<br />

have nothing to do with their authenticity or otherwise.<br />

All I want to say in this context is that there are both good <strong>and</strong> evil souls; good souls are known as<br />

gods <strong>and</strong> evil souls as ghosts. In the West these gods are known as masters: the word ”master” has<br />

be<strong>com</strong>e a synonym for god in the current use in the West. <strong>The</strong>se gods have always sent messages,<br />

<strong>and</strong> they continue to do so. Similarly, even evil souls send messages; they are also looking out for<br />

suitable mediums. If ever you are in a frame of mind that suits the evil souls, they will not fail to<br />

utilize you.<br />

<strong>Man</strong>y times people do things they would not do on their own. <strong>The</strong>y be<strong>com</strong>e just instruments in the<br />

h<strong>and</strong>s of evil spirits. So when a murderer swears before a judge that he <strong>com</strong>mitted the crime in spite<br />

of himself, he is not necessarily Lying. It is possible. <strong>The</strong>re are spirits that use people to <strong>com</strong>mit<br />

heinous crimes on their behalf. <strong>The</strong>re are buildings all over the world haunted by evil spirits, <strong>and</strong> if<br />

you go to live in them you will be <strong>com</strong>pelled to <strong>com</strong>mit murders at their behest. Feuds <strong>and</strong> vendettas<br />

are carried on not only from one generation to another, but also from one life to another.<br />

A young man was brought to me recently. <strong>The</strong> house he has been living in was bought three years<br />

ago. And ever since, a process of deterioration in his personality set in <strong>and</strong> by <strong>and</strong> by he became<br />

a different man altogether. Before <strong>com</strong>ing to this house this young man was known for being very<br />

gentle <strong>and</strong> meek; now he is arrogant <strong>and</strong> haughty, irritable <strong>and</strong> violent – ready to fight at the slightest<br />

provocation. This metamorphosis, this mutation in his personality took place the very day he entered<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 311 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!