24.04.2013 Views

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 14. ACTION, INACTION AND NON-ACTION<br />

the h<strong>and</strong>s of existence, nothing more. So don’t think that you ate going to kill them. If you think<br />

you are the doer then you are bound to be afraid. With the doer <strong>com</strong>es fear, anxiety <strong>and</strong> anguish.<br />

Every suffering, every sorrow, arises from the ego, the doer, which is a false entity. You are utterly<br />

mistaken if you think you are the doer; you are merely an instrument in the h<strong>and</strong>s of the divine. Let<br />

it do what it wants to be done through you, <strong>and</strong> let go of yourself.”<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, while concluding the GEETA, <strong>Krishna</strong> says to Arjuna, ”Give up everything, give up all<br />

religions, all sense of the doer <strong>and</strong> doing, give up your ego <strong>and</strong> be established in inaction.”<br />

Inaction is the technique of remembering.<br />

Question 2<br />

QUESTIONER: WE ARE GRATEFUL TO YOU FOR YOUR SUPERB EXPOSITION OF ACTION,<br />

INACTION AND NON-ACTION. YOU HAD EXPLAINED TO THE FOREIGN DISCIPLES OF<br />

MAHESH YOGI WHEN THEY MET YOU IN KASHMIR LAST YEAR ABOUT THE SIGNIFICANCE<br />

OF INACTION IN ACHIEVING SELF-KNOWLEDGE, AND WE HAVE NOW NO CONFUSION<br />

ABOUT IT. BUT SOME CONFUSION SURELY ARISES FROM KRISHNA’S EXPOSITION OF<br />

INACTION IN THE GEETA. HE EMPHASIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF INACTION, BUT IT SEEMS<br />

TO BE CONFUSING, BECAUSE IT HAS MORE THAN ONE MEANING. HE SAYS THAT A YOGI<br />

IS ONE WHO, HAVING ACTED DOES NOT THINK HE HAS ACTED, AND A SANNYASIN IS ONE<br />

WHO DOES NOT ACT AND YET ACTION HAPPENS. THERE IS YET ANOTHER SIDE TO THIS<br />

QUESTION WHICH SEEMS IMPORTANT. SHANKARACHARYA SAYS IN HIS COMMENTARIES<br />

ON THE GEETA, THAT A WISE MAN DOES NOT NEED TO ACT, BECAUSE ACTION BELONGS<br />

TO THE DOER. AND YOU SAY THAT WE DON’T HAVE TO ACT, BECAUSE ACTION HAPPENS<br />

ON ITS OWN. BUT WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO ARJUNA’S INDIVIDUALITY IF HE CONSENTS TO<br />

BE JUST AN INSTRUMENT IN THE HANDS OF EXISTENCE?<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong> says that when one acts as if he does not act at all, it is yoga. Yoga means action through<br />

inaction. To be<strong>com</strong>e a non-doer is yoga. <strong>The</strong> other thing he says is that when one does not do a<br />

thing <strong>and</strong> yet knows he has done everything, it is sannyas. This is another side of the same coin.<br />

Doing nothing, everything is done.<br />

Sannyas <strong>and</strong> yoga are two sides of the same coin. Of course, they are two opposite sides of the<br />

coin, but they are inseparable. It is difficult to say where the one side ends <strong>and</strong> the other begins. It is<br />

true that the one side is the opposite of the other, but they are so inextricably joined that one cannot<br />

be without the other. In fact, there cannot be a coin with only one side, it has to have two sides –<br />

one opposite to the other. <strong>The</strong>y really <strong>com</strong>plement each other, they are not at all contradictory. Its<br />

front <strong>and</strong> back together make up a coin.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no contradiction whatsoever in the two statements of <strong>Krishna</strong>, <strong>and</strong> there is no room for<br />

confusion either. If you look at a wise man from his front side he will look a yogi, <strong>and</strong> the same wise<br />

man will look a sannyasin if you view him from the rear. And <strong>Krishna</strong>’s definition of the two sides<br />

is absolutely right. He defines a wise man, who is both yogi <strong>and</strong> sannyasin, as one who is actively<br />

inactive <strong>and</strong> inactively active. And remember, these two sides are simultaneously present in one<br />

who knows the truth, it is not possible to separate one of his sides from the other. One who acts<br />

through inaction can also be non-acting through action. <strong>The</strong>se are two sides of the same coin. And<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 266 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!