Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

oshorajneesh.com
from oshorajneesh.com More from this publisher
24.04.2013 Views

CHAPTER 12. DISCIPLINE, DEVOTION AND KRISHNA think him to be a madman, but he tells them again and again, ”I am already there where you are going; I need not go anywhere or do anything.” For such a person neither devotion nor discipline has any meaning. But for you they are very meaningful. As far as I am concerned, from time to time I am going to speak about them, about their usefulness and even about their uselessness. But there is no contradiction in what I say if you understand me rightly. There is really no contradiction. Question 7 QUESTIONER: THERE IS YET ANOTHER CONTRADICTION. YOU SAID THAT WHILE KRISHNA WAS BORN ENLIGHTENED, MAHAVIRA ATTAINED TO ENLIGHTENMENT THROUGH EFFORTS. BUT IN THE COURSE OF YOUR DISCOURSES ON MAHAVIRA IN KASHMIR LAST YEAR, YOU SAID THAT MAHAVIRA HAD COMPLETED ALL HIS SPIRITUAL DISCIPLINE IN HIS PAST LIVES, AND IN HIS LAST LIFE AS MAHAVIRA HE HAD NOTHING MORE TO DO THAN GIVE EXPRESSION TO HIS EXPERIENCES OF ENLIGHTENMENT. IF IT IS SO, THEN MAHAVIRA WAS ALSO BORN ENLIGHTENED. PLEASE COMMENT. No, I did not say that. I said that all of Mahavira’s achievements came through discipline, through efforts. Whether he completed them in his last life or many lives before is not at all important. What is important is that he achieved everything through efforts, a long journey of efforts. Krishna did not have to do anything in any of his lives – past or present. Question 8 QUESTIONER: DID HE COME TO WHOLENESS STRAIGHTAWAY? To us it seems difficult to understand how one can come straightaway to wholeness. We think one must pass through a criss-crossing of roads before he arrives. Again, this is the same question that pilgrims asked of the Zen monk Lying near a cave. The monk says he does not have to do a thing, because he is already there where one should be. The pilgrims wonder how one could arrive without traveling, it seems impossible. They all had to walk long distances before they reached the place of pilgrimage, but the sage says to them, ”If you cannot attain to truth right here, how can you attain to it by going to the mountain top? Truth is everywhere. It is here and now. This is not something that one needs any traveling to arrive at.” But there are some types who cannot arrive without making a long journey. Even if they have to come home they will not do so without knocking at the doors of many other houses. They will enquire from others about directions to their own house. Whether one chooses effort or effortlessness depends on what type of person he is. There is certainly a difference of type between Mahavira and Krishna. Mahavira will not choose to arrive without making a long journey. He will refuse to attain anything if it comes without effort. This needs to be understood. If someone tells Mahavira that he can achieve enlightenment without effort he will refuse it. He will say it is outright theft if you grab something without making any effort to achieve it, without striving and struggling for it, without earning it with the sweat of your brow. Before you have a thing, Mahavira will insist you must pay for it, deserve it. Mahavira will, as I understand him, reject even moksha, liberation, if it comes to him as a gift. He will search for it, struggle for it, he will earn it. He will accept moksha only when he is worthy of it. Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy 234 Osho

CHAPTER 12. DISCIPLINE, DEVOTION AND KRISHNA Krishna will say just the opposite. He will say what is achieved through long search and struggle is not worth having. That which can be found can be lost too. He will say, ”I will accept only that which comes uninvited, without efforts. I will be content with that which is, the true. And truth is not a thing that one can find.” This is a difference in approach to life that comes with individuals and their types. There is nothing superior or inferior about it. As individuals, Krishna and Mahavira are basically different from each other. What is found through long search and striving has significance for Mahavira. This is the reason he and his whole tradition are known by that strange name shraman, which simply means one who toils. Mahavira believes the price of freedom is hard work, and what is had effortlessly is sheer thievery. According to him, if God is found without effort, it cannot he the real God; there must he some deception about it. And Mahavira’s sense of self-respect will not allow him to accept anything that comes as a gift, he will earn it with the sweat of his brow. That is why a term like God’s grace has no place in Mahavira’s philosophy. On the other hand, it is replete with words like efforts, struggle, hard work, discipline, and sadhana. This is as it should he. His whole tradition is based on hard work. There are two cultural traditions in India, running parallel to each other. One is known as shraman sanskriti or toil-oriented culture, and the other is called brahmin sanskriti or God-oriented culture. The brahmanic tradition believes man is God, he does not have to become it, while the shraman tradition believes that man has to earn godliness, he is not it. And there are only two types of people in the world – brahmins or shramans – conforming to one of these traditions. And the ratio of brahmins is very small; even the brahmins are not that brahmin. The vast majority consists of shramans, doers who believe in efforts. To them everything must come the hard way. It needs tremendous courage, patience, and trust to believe that one can find without effort, that one can attain without attaining, that one can arrive without stepping out of one’s house. Our ordinary mind says that if you want to find something, you will have to make adequate efforts for it, nothing is had without a price. Our ordinary arithmetic believes that efforts and achievements have to be in equal proportions. Once in a great while a few brahmins have walked this earth, they can be counted on fingers. The rest of us are shramans, whether we accept it or not. That is why despite great differences between Buddha and Mahavira, their traditions became known by the common name of shraman. In this respect Buddhists are not different from the Jainas, they are the same. Krishna is a brahmin – a rare thing. He says, ”I am already the supreme being.” And remember, I am not saying that one is right and another is wrong. To me both shraman and brahmin are right, there is no difficulty about it. They represent two different types of minds, two different ways of thinking, two different kinds of journeying. That is the only difference. Question 9 QUESTIONER: ONE LAST QUESTION, IF YOU PERMIT. HOW IS IT THAT KRISHNA, IN ALL HIS PAST LIVES, HAS NEVER BEEN IGNORANT AND IMPERFECT? Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy 235 Osho

CHAPTER 12. DISCIPLINE, DEVOTION AND KRISHNA<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong> will say just the opposite. He will say what is achieved through long search <strong>and</strong> struggle is<br />

not worth having. That which can be found can be lost too. He will say, ”I will accept only that which<br />

<strong>com</strong>es uninvited, without efforts. I will be content with that which is, the true. And truth is not a thing<br />

that one can find.”<br />

This is a difference in approach to life that <strong>com</strong>es with individuals <strong>and</strong> their types. <strong>The</strong>re is nothing<br />

superior or inferior about it. As individuals, <strong>Krishna</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mahavira are basically different from each<br />

other.<br />

What is found through long search <strong>and</strong> striving has significance for Mahavira. This is the reason<br />

he <strong>and</strong> his whole tradition are known by that strange name shraman, which simply means one who<br />

toils. Mahavira believes the price of freedom is hard work, <strong>and</strong> what is had effortlessly is sheer<br />

thievery. According to him, if God is found without effort, it cannot he the real God; there must he<br />

some deception about it. And Mahavira’s sense of self-respect will not allow him to accept anything<br />

that <strong>com</strong>es as a gift, he will earn it with the sweat of his brow. That is why a term like God’s grace has<br />

no place in Mahavira’s philosophy. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, it is replete with words like efforts, struggle,<br />

hard work, discipline, <strong>and</strong> sadhana. This is as it should he. <strong>His</strong> whole tradition is based on hard<br />

work.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are two cultural traditions in India, running parallel to each other. One is known as shraman<br />

sanskriti or toil-oriented culture, <strong>and</strong> the other is called brahmin sanskriti or God-oriented culture.<br />

<strong>The</strong> brahmanic tradition believes man is God, he does not have to be<strong>com</strong>e it, while the shraman<br />

tradition believes that man has to earn godliness, he is not it. And there are only two types of<br />

people in the world – brahmins or shramans – conforming to one of these traditions. And the ratio<br />

of brahmins is very small; even the brahmins are not that brahmin. <strong>The</strong> vast majority consists of<br />

shramans, doers who believe in efforts. To them everything must <strong>com</strong>e the hard way. It needs<br />

tremendous courage, patience, <strong>and</strong> trust to believe that one can find without effort, that one can<br />

attain without attaining, that one can arrive without stepping out of one’s house. Our ordinary mind<br />

says that if you want to find something, you will have to make adequate efforts for it, nothing is had<br />

without a price. Our ordinary arithmetic believes that efforts <strong>and</strong> achievements have to be in equal<br />

proportions.<br />

Once in a great while a few brahmins have walked this earth, they can be counted on fingers. <strong>The</strong><br />

rest of us are shramans, whether we accept it or not. That is why despite great differences between<br />

Buddha <strong>and</strong> Mahavira, their traditions became known by the <strong>com</strong>mon name of shraman. In this<br />

respect Buddhists are not different from the Jainas, they are the same.<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong> is a brahmin – a rare thing. He says, ”I am already the supreme being.”<br />

And remember, I am not saying that one is right <strong>and</strong> another is wrong. To me both shraman <strong>and</strong><br />

brahmin are right, there is no difficulty about it. <strong>The</strong>y represent two different types of minds, two<br />

different ways of thinking, two different kinds of journeying. That is the only difference.<br />

Question 9<br />

QUESTIONER: ONE LAST QUESTION, IF YOU PERMIT. HOW IS IT THAT KRISHNA, IN ALL HIS<br />

PAST LIVES, HAS NEVER BEEN IGNORANT AND IMPERFECT?<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 235 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!