24.04.2013 Views

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 12. DISCIPLINE, DEVOTION AND KRISHNA<br />

Let us now go into this question in the context of <strong>Krishna</strong>.<br />

In fact. all philosophical quarrels are childish. Even the biggest philosophical battles have been<br />

fought over a problem which can be summed up in a child’s question: ”Which <strong>com</strong>es first, the chicken<br />

or the egg?” It is really around this small question that all the great battles between philosophers<br />

have taken place. But those who know will say the chicken <strong>and</strong> egg are not two. Those who raise<br />

this question are stupid, <strong>and</strong> those answering it are even more stupid.<br />

What is an egg but a chicken in the making? And what is a chicken but an egg fulfilled, <strong>com</strong>e to its<br />

fullness? Egg <strong>and</strong> chicken hide each other in themselves. <strong>The</strong> question of who precedes whom is<br />

meaningful if egg <strong>and</strong> chicken are two separate things. <strong>The</strong> truth is that they are the same. Or we<br />

can say that they are the two ways of looking at the same thing. Or they are two different phases,<br />

two states of the manifestation of the same thing.<br />

Similarly, seed <strong>and</strong> tree are not separate. Neither are light <strong>and</strong> dark. Nor are birth <strong>and</strong> death <strong>The</strong>y<br />

are two ways of looking at the same thing. Maybe, because we don’t know how to see a thing rightly,<br />

we see it in fragments. For example, there is a big room inside a house <strong>and</strong> the house is locked.<br />

Someone wants to have a look at the room <strong>and</strong> so he drills a hole through a wall. Now he peers into<br />

the room from side to side. At first a chair will <strong>com</strong>e into view, then another chair, <strong>and</strong> so on <strong>and</strong> so<br />

forth. He cannot have a full view of the room all at once. And he can very well ask, ”Which <strong>com</strong>es<br />

first <strong>and</strong> which afterward?” No arguments can settle this question. But if the person manages to<br />

enter the room he can see the whole room together, <strong>and</strong> then he will not ask what <strong>com</strong>es first.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a laboratory in Oxford University which has to its credit some of the greatest explorations<br />

<strong>and</strong> researches done in the present century. And I think this laboratory is performing the most<br />

significant job for our future. It is known as the De La Warr Laboratory. <strong>The</strong>re a miracle happened<br />

when a bud was exposed to a camera, <strong>and</strong> it turned out in print to be the picture of the full flower<br />

into which the bud was eventually going to bloom.<br />

<strong>The</strong> film used in the camera had such high sensitivity, the highest ever, that it captured the hidden<br />

potential of the bud in the form of a fully-blossomed flower. It was simply incredible how a camera<br />

photographing a bud brought out the picture of the flower that the bud was going to be in the future.<br />

At the moment of photographing it was only a bud, <strong>and</strong> no one knew what kind of flower it was<br />

going to make. Maybe the flower was already present, physically present at some mysterious level<br />

of existence which we cannot see with our physical eyes – but the extra-sensitive film used in the<br />

camera succeeded in seeing it.<br />

It was a breathtaking event, <strong>and</strong> even the scientists working at De La Warr were dazed <strong>and</strong> left<br />

puzzled about how the magic worked. <strong>The</strong>y thought that perhaps at some unseen level of existence<br />

the bud <strong>and</strong> the flower were in existence simultaneously. <strong>The</strong> scientists thought perhaps through<br />

some technical error the film had been exposed earlier, when it had taken in the picture of a flower.<br />

Or, maybe some chemical mishap has brought about this inexplicable result.<br />

So the scientists decided to wait until the bud turned into a full flower. But when it happened they<br />

were amazed to see that it was exactly the same flower whose picture the camera had captured<br />

earlier when it was only a bud. <strong>The</strong>y now knew there was no chemical or technical error involved. A<br />

photographic miracle – say a scientific miracle – had really taken<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 228 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!