24.04.2013 Views

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 12. DISCIPLINE, DEVOTION AND KRISHNA<br />

So sadhana ultimately leads to the soul, while upasana, devotion leads to God. One who disciplines<br />

himself will end with the soul, he cannot go beyond it He will say that he has ultimately found himself,<br />

his soul. On the other h<strong>and</strong> the devotee will say that he has lost himself <strong>and</strong> found God. So the<br />

sadhaka <strong>and</strong> the upasaka, the man of discipline <strong>and</strong> the devotee, are contrary to each other; they are<br />

not the same. While an upasaka will melt <strong>and</strong> evaporate like water, a sadhaka will be strengthened<br />

<strong>and</strong> crystallized as a soul.<br />

In <strong>Krishna</strong>’s life there is no element of discipline; there is actually no place whatsoever for sadhana.<br />

It is upasana or devotion which has meaning for <strong>Krishna</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> whole journey of upasana is opposed to effort <strong>and</strong> discipline; it enters a different dimension<br />

altogether. For an upasaka it is a mistake to think that one finds himself. <strong>The</strong> self is the only barrier,<br />

the only falsehood. To be is the only bondage. And therefore not to be, or to be nothing, is the only<br />

freedom. While a sadhaka says, ”I want to be free,” an upasaka says, ”I want to be free from the<br />

’?’, the self.” A sadhaka says, ”I want freedom,” but his ”I” remains intact. To an upasaka, freedom<br />

means a state of ”non-I” or <strong>com</strong>plete egolessness. Not freedom of the ”I” but freedom from the ”I” is<br />

the highest state for an upasaka. So sadhana has no place in the vocabulary of <strong>Krishna</strong>; upasana<br />

has.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore I will go into upasana in depth. To underst<strong>and</strong> it, it is necessary first to know that it has<br />

nothing to do with efforts or discipline. Unless we know it clearly, we will continue to confuse the<br />

two. And remember that very few people want to take the path of devotion <strong>and</strong> worship. Most people<br />

would like to be sadhakas. doers. A sadhaka has nothing to lose, he has only to gain something –<br />

his soul. And an upasaka has everything to lose, he has to lose himself totally, he has nothing to<br />

gain. Losing is his only gain, <strong>and</strong> nothing else. So very few people want to take this path. That is<br />

why even the lovers of <strong>Krishna</strong> turn into sadhakas. <strong>The</strong>y too talk in terms of sadhana <strong>and</strong> discipline,<br />

because they love to be doers. <strong>The</strong> ego loves the words: strive, achieve, arrive; it is always after<br />

achievement.<br />

Upasana is arduous, devotion is hard. Nothing is more difficult than evaporating <strong>and</strong> disappearing<br />

into nothingness. One would, for sure, want to know why he should die <strong>and</strong> disappear into nothing<br />

ness, what he is going to gain by dying as an entity. A sadhaka, in spite of his lofty words, will always<br />

think in terms of gain <strong>and</strong> loss. Even his liberation is nothing more than a means to his happiness;<br />

his freedom is his freedom. So it is not surprising that a sadhaka is a selfish person in the deeper<br />

sense of the word. In this sense he cannot rise above the self. But an upasaka, a devotee will rise<br />

above self <strong>and</strong> will know the ultimate, where the self is no more.<br />

What is this upasana? What is its meaning <strong>and</strong> significance? What is its way? Before you try to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> this question of upasana, it is essential that you drop the idea of sadhana altogether.<br />

Forget it; it has no place whatsoever. Only then you can know what upasana is.<br />

As I said. the word upasana means to sit near someone, to sit close to someone. But what is the<br />

distance, the remoteness that has to be over<strong>com</strong>e in order to be near? <strong>The</strong>re is physical distance,<br />

distance in space. You are sitting there <strong>and</strong> I am sitting here, <strong>and</strong> there is a distance between<br />

you <strong>and</strong> me. This is physical distance. We move closer to each other <strong>and</strong> the physical distance<br />

disappears. If we sit together taking each other’s h<strong>and</strong>s, the distance will disappear <strong>com</strong>pletely.<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 222 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!