24.04.2013 Views

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 12. DISCIPLINE, DEVOTION AND KRISHNA<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong> makes every side, every facet of his life divine; with him every direction of life be<strong>com</strong>es<br />

sacred. It is not so with Mahavira: one particular direction in which he journeys be<strong>com</strong>es sacred,<br />

while all other directions remain profane. And in fact because his one direction be<strong>com</strong>es sacred all<br />

other directions are bound to remain profane; these are automatically condemned; doomed to live<br />

in the shade of profanity. And this is applicable not only to Mahavira, but also to Rama, Buddha,<br />

Christ, Mohammed – all those who adhere to one exclusive direction in life’s quest.<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong> is the sole being about whom it can be said that he made every path, every facet of life<br />

sacred <strong>and</strong> holy. He made it possible for every kind of seeker to attain to the supreme from any<br />

direction that <strong>com</strong>es naturally to him. In this sense he is multi-dimensional, not only for himself but<br />

for others too. With a flute on his lips one can dance his way to God; playing a flute he can touch that<br />

depth where samadhi, or ecstasy happens. But to Mahavira <strong>and</strong> Buddha with a flute there is no way.<br />

It is not possible on the paths of Mahavira <strong>and</strong> Buddha that a flute can achieve the majestic heights<br />

of meditation <strong>and</strong> samadhi. It is impossible. To Mahavira, Meera can never attain to the highest; she<br />

is attached to <strong>Krishna</strong>, she loves <strong>Krishna</strong>. And according to Mahavira, attachment can never lead<br />

you to God, only non-attachment can. But going with <strong>Krishna</strong>, both the attached <strong>and</strong> non-attached<br />

can reach the same destination.<br />

That is why I say that <strong>Krishna</strong>’s wholeness is in<strong>com</strong>parable; it is rare.<br />

Secondly, you want to know if none of the Jaina tirthankaras attained to wholeness. No, they all had<br />

attained to it, but only to one-dimensional wholeness. And it was because of this that Jaina ideology<br />

could not achieve widespread popularity. It was inherent in the very nature of Jainism. Twenty-five<br />

centuries have passed, <strong>and</strong> there ate only three <strong>and</strong> a half million Jainas, a very poor figure.<br />

It is ironic that the message of a person of the stature of Mahavira – <strong>and</strong> he was not alone, he carried<br />

with him an immense heritage bequeathed by twenty-three tirthankaras – could reach only three <strong>and</strong><br />

a half million people. If only three dozen persons had been influenced by Mahavira in his lifetime,<br />

they alone through procreation would have, in the course of twenty-five hundred years, reached<br />

this figure. What is the cause? <strong>The</strong> cause is obvious. It is their one-dimensional approach. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

lack the multi-dimensional wholeness of <strong>Krishna</strong>. <strong>The</strong>ir appeal is limited to a few; it is ineffectual<br />

in reaching the rest of mankind. People with inclinations different from the single dimension that<br />

Jainism represents remain wholly unaffected; they don’t find themselves in tune with it.<br />

It is ironic that even this h<strong>and</strong>ful of Jainas don’t treat Mahavira the way he should be treated. It is all<br />

right to worship <strong>Krishna</strong>, but it is repugnant to Mahavira’s teachings. And the Jainas are worshipping<br />

Mahavira. Worship is okay with <strong>Krishna</strong> but not with Mahavira. It means Mahavira will not agree<br />

with the minds of even those few who are born into the Jaina <strong>com</strong>munity. <strong>The</strong> reason is that the<br />

dimension of Mahavira is very exclusive; it accords with few. So being born in the Jaina <strong>com</strong>munity<br />

one continues to be a Jaina, but takes on many things that don’t belong to Mahavira’s dimension.<br />

Devotion has entered Jainism, <strong>and</strong> along with it have <strong>com</strong>e worship <strong>and</strong> prayer <strong>and</strong> other rituals.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y have nothing to do with Mahavira; they are alien to his genius. In fact, devotion <strong>and</strong> worship are<br />

an outrage against Mahavira; there is no place for them in the life of Mahavira. But the Jainas have<br />

their own difficulty; they cannot feel gratified without worship <strong>and</strong> prayer. So they go on incorporating<br />

all these things into the religion of Mahavira.<br />

Here I would like to say that all those who have attained to one-dimensional wholeness are bound<br />

to be unjustly treated by their followers; they cannot escape it. But you cannot misbehave in this<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 218 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!