Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

oshorajneesh.com
from oshorajneesh.com More from this publisher
24.04.2013 Views

CHAPTER 1. THE FUTURE BELONGS TO KRISHNA Now it is very strange logic that equality has to be had for freedom to come, and that freedom has to be sacrificed for equality to come. The truth is, once freedom is lost it will be impossible to restore it. Who will restore it? You all are here listening to me. I tell you that in order to make you all equal it is necessary to put you in shackles first. I tell you that without putting you in fetters it will not be possible to equalize you. Maybe someone has a bigger head than others, another has larger arms and a third one has longer legs – they all will have to be cut to equal size. And this painful operation will not be possible without first depriving you of your freedom. And it sounds very logical. But people forget that the person who will make them all equal will himself remain tree and unequal; he will remain outside them all. He will have no fetters on his feet and, besides, he will have a gun in his hand. Now you can well envision a situation, a society where most people are in shackles, maimed and crippled, and a handful of people are free and powerful with all the modern instruments of suppression and oppression at their disposal. What can you do in a situation like this? Marx held the view that in order to achieve equality in society it would, in the first place, be necessary to suppress political freedom, destroy individual liberty and establish a dictatorship. And he thought that after the achievement of equality, freedom would be restored to the people. But do you think people with such enormous power in their hands that they can equalize everyone will ever give you back your freedom? We don’t see any sign of it in the countries where such experiments have been conducted. In fact, as the power of the rulers grows, and as the people, the ruled, ate systematically suppressed and debilitated, the hope for freedom becomes increasingly dim. Then it is difficult even to raise the question of freedom. Nobody dares ask a question, speak his thoughts, much less dissent and rebel against the established tyranny. In the name of equality, and under the cover of equality, freedom is going to be destroyed. And once it is destroyed it will be neatly impossible to win it back – because those who destroy freedom will see to it that the chances of its being revived in the future are also destroyed. Secondly, you should know that while freedom is an absolutely natural phenomenon, which everyone must have as his right, equality is not. Equality is neither natural nor possible. The concept of equality is unpsychological; all people cannot be equal. They are not equal; they are basically unequal. But freedom is a must. Everyone should be free to be what he is and what he can be. Everyone should have full freedom and opportunity to be himself. In my view, Krishna is on the side of freedom; he cannot be on the side of equality. If there is freedom it is possible that inequality will diminish. I don’t say equality will come with freedom, I only say in equality will gradually be reduced. But if equality is forced on people then their freedom is bound to diminish and disappear. Anything imposed with force is synonymous with slavery. So basically it is a choice of values. And in my vision the individual is the highest value. So freedom of the individual is of the highest. The camp of evil has always been against the individual and in favor of the group, the collective, The individual has no value whatsoever in the eyes of evil, and there is good reason for it. The individual is rebellious; he is the seed of rebellion. You will be surprised to know that if you want some evil act to be done you will find it easier through a group than through an individual. Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy 18 Osho

CHAPTER 1. THE FUTURE BELONGS TO KRISHNA It is very difficult for an individual Hindu to set fire to a mosque, but a crowd of Hindus can do it for fun. An individual Mohammedan will find it hard to stick a knife into the chest of a Hindu child, but a horde of Mohammedans can do it without a qualm of conscience. In fact, the bigger a crowd the less soul it has. But it is the sense of responsibility that forms the kernel of the soul. When I go to push a knife in somebody’s chest my conscience bites at me. It says, ”What are you doing?” But my soul does not feel disturbed when I am with a crowd, killing people recklessly and burning their property. Then I say it is not me but the people, the Hindus or Muslims, who are doing it, and I am just keeping company with them – and tomorrow I will not be held individually responsible for it. The side of evil always wants to attract the crowd; it depends on the crowd. Evil wants to destroy the individual whom it feels is a thorn in its flesh. It wants the crowd, the mass to live and grow. Good, on the contrary, accepts the individual and wants him to grow to his supreme fulfillment and, at the same time, it wants the crowd to disappear gradually from the scene. Good stands for a society of individuals, free individuals. Individuals will, of course, have relationships, but then it will be a society and not a herd, not a crowd. This needs to be rightly understood. Only free individuals make a society, and where the sovereignty of the individual is denied, society turns into a herd, a mob. This is the difference between a society and a crowd. Society is another name for the inter-relationship of individuals, a cooperative of individuals – but the individual has to be there, he is the basic unit of society. When an individual freely enters into relationship with another individual, it makes for society. So there cannot be a society inside a prison; a prison can only have a crowd, a collection of faceless individuals. Prisoners also relate with each other, exchanging greetings and gifts among themselves, but they are definitely not a society. They have just been gathered together and forced to live within the four walls of a prison; it is not their free choice. Therefore I say that Krishna will choose the side where freedom and the sovereignty of the individual, where religion and the possibility to seek the unseen and the unknown will be available in predominance. I say ”in predominance” because it never happens that one side has all these values and the other side is wholly devoid of them. The division between good and evil is never so clear-cut, even in a battle between Rama and Ravana. Even in Ravana there is a little of Rama, and there is a little of Ravana in Rama too. The Kauravas share a few of the virtues of the Pandavas, and the latter a few of the vices of the former. Even the best man on this earth has something of the worst in him. And the meanest of us all carries a bit of goodness in him. So it is always a question of proportion and predominance of one or the other. So freedom and the individual and the soul and religion are the values with which the intelligence of good will side. Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy 19 Osho

CHAPTER 1. THE FUTURE BELONGS TO KRISHNA<br />

Now it is very strange logic that equality has to be had for freedom to <strong>com</strong>e, <strong>and</strong> that freedom has to<br />

be sacrificed for equality to <strong>com</strong>e. <strong>The</strong> truth is, once freedom is lost it will be impossible to restore<br />

it. Who will restore it?<br />

You all are here listening to me. I tell you that in order to make you all equal it is necessary to put<br />

you in shackles first. I tell you that without putting you in fetters it will not be possible to equalize<br />

you. Maybe someone has a bigger head than others, another has larger arms <strong>and</strong> a third one has<br />

longer legs – they all will have to be cut to equal size. And this painful operation will not be possible<br />

without first depriving you of your freedom. And it sounds very logical.<br />

But people forget that the person who will make them all equal will himself remain tree <strong>and</strong> unequal;<br />

he will remain outside them all. He will have no fetters on his feet <strong>and</strong>, besides, he will have a gun<br />

in his h<strong>and</strong>. Now you can well envision a situation, a society where most people are in shackles,<br />

maimed <strong>and</strong> crippled, <strong>and</strong> a h<strong>and</strong>ful of people are free <strong>and</strong> powerful with all the modern instruments<br />

of suppression <strong>and</strong> oppression at their disposal. What can you do in a situation like this?<br />

Marx held the view that in order to achieve equality in society it would, in the first place, be necessary<br />

to suppress political freedom, destroy individual liberty <strong>and</strong> establish a dictatorship. And he thought<br />

that after the achievement of equality, freedom would be restored to the people. But do you think<br />

people with such enormous power in their h<strong>and</strong>s that they can equalize everyone will ever give you<br />

back your freedom? We don’t see any sign of it in the countries where such experiments have been<br />

conducted. In fact, as the power of the rulers grows, <strong>and</strong> as the people, the ruled, ate systematically<br />

suppressed <strong>and</strong> debilitated, the hope for freedom be<strong>com</strong>es increasingly dim. <strong>The</strong>n it is difficult even<br />

to raise the question of freedom. Nobody dares ask a question, speak his thoughts, much less<br />

dissent <strong>and</strong> rebel against the established tyranny.<br />

In the name of equality, <strong>and</strong> under the cover of equality, freedom is going to be destroyed. And once<br />

it is destroyed it will be neatly impossible to win it back – because those who destroy freedom will<br />

see to it that the chances of its being revived in the future are also destroyed.<br />

Secondly, you should know that while freedom is an absolutely natural phenomenon, which everyone<br />

must have as his right, equality is not. Equality is neither natural nor possible. <strong>The</strong> concept of<br />

equality is unpsychological; all people cannot be equal. <strong>The</strong>y are not equal; they are basically<br />

unequal. But freedom is a must. Everyone should be free to be what he is <strong>and</strong> what he can be.<br />

Everyone should have full freedom <strong>and</strong> opportunity to be himself.<br />

In my view, <strong>Krishna</strong> is on the side of freedom; he cannot be on the side of equality. If there is<br />

freedom it is possible that inequality will diminish. I don’t say equality will <strong>com</strong>e with freedom, I only<br />

say in equality will gradually be reduced. But if equality is forced on people then their freedom is<br />

bound to diminish <strong>and</strong> disappear. Anything imposed with force is synonymous with slavery.<br />

So basically it is a choice of values. And in my vision the individual is the highest value. So freedom<br />

of the individual is of the highest.<br />

<strong>The</strong> camp of evil has always been against the individual <strong>and</strong> in favor of the group, the collective, <strong>The</strong><br />

individual has no value whatsoever in the eyes of evil, <strong>and</strong> there is good reason for it. <strong>The</strong> individual<br />

is rebellious; he is the seed of rebellion. You will be surprised to know that if you want some evil act<br />

to be done you will find it easier through a group than through an individual.<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 18 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!