24.04.2013 Views

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 1. THE FUTURE BELONGS TO KRISHNA<br />

It is true, however, that our earth is now too small for a modern war. A war, in fact, needs space<br />

too. Our instruments of war are now so gigantic that, obviously, war on this planet is simply not<br />

possible. But it is so, not because what the pacifists say is right <strong>and</strong> has to be accepted out of fear,<br />

but because the earth is now too small for the huge means of war science <strong>and</strong> technology have put<br />

into our h<strong>and</strong>s. So war on this planet has be<strong>com</strong>e meaningless. Now the shape of war is going to<br />

change <strong>and</strong> its scope, escalate. New wars will be fought on the moon <strong>and</strong> Mars, on other planets<br />

<strong>and</strong> satellites.<br />

Scientists say there are at least fifty thous<strong>and</strong> planets in the universe where life exists. And if we<br />

accept the counsel of despair, if we listen to those who are frightened of nuclear weaponry, we will<br />

prevent the great adventure which man is now going to make into the vast infinity of space. But it<br />

is true we have reached a point where war on this earth has be<strong>com</strong>e meaningless. But why it is so<br />

has to be clearly understood.<br />

War has be<strong>com</strong>e meaningless not because what the pacifists say has struck home with us, war has<br />

lost its meaning because the science of war has attained perfection, because now a total war can<br />

be a reality. And to fight a total war on this earth will be a self-defeating exercise. War is meaningful<br />

so long as one side wins <strong>and</strong> another loses, but in a nuclear war, if <strong>and</strong> when it takes place, there<br />

will be no victor <strong>and</strong> no vanquished – both will simply disappear from the earth. So war on this earth<br />

has be<strong>com</strong>e irrelevant.<br />

And for this reason I can see the whole world <strong>com</strong>ing together as one world. Now the world will be<br />

no more than a global village.<br />

<strong>The</strong> earth has be<strong>com</strong>e as small as a village – even smaller than a village. It now takes less time<br />

to go around the world than it took to go from one village to another in the past. So this world has<br />

be<strong>com</strong>e too small for a total kind of war; it would be sheer stupidity to wage a war here. This does<br />

not mean there should be no wars, nor does it mean there will be no wars in the future. War will<br />

continue to take place, but now it will take place on newer grounds, on other planets. Now man will<br />

go on newer adventures, newer incursions <strong>and</strong> greater campaigns. In spite of what the pacifists said<br />

<strong>and</strong> did war could not be abolished. It cannot be abolished because it is a part of life.<br />

It makes an interesting story if we assess the gains we have had from war. A careful observation will<br />

reveal that all our cooperative efforts <strong>and</strong> institutions are the products of war. It is called cooperation<br />

for conflict: we cooperate to fight. And with the disappearance of war, cooperation will disappear.<br />

So it is extremely important to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>Krishna</strong>. <strong>Krishna</strong> is neither a pacifist nor a hawk. He has<br />

nothing to do with any ”ism”. In fact, an ”ism” means choice, that we choose one of the opposites.<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong> is ”non-ism”. He says that if good <strong>com</strong>es through peace, we should wel<strong>com</strong>e peace, <strong>and</strong><br />

that if good flows from war then war is equally wel<strong>com</strong>e. Do you underst<strong>and</strong> what I mean? <strong>Krishna</strong><br />

says, <strong>and</strong> I say the same, that whatever brings bliss <strong>and</strong> benediction <strong>and</strong> helps the growth of religion<br />

is wel<strong>com</strong>e. We should wel<strong>com</strong>e it.<br />

We would not have been that impotent if our country had understood <strong>Krishna</strong> rightly. But we have<br />

covered all our ugliness with beautiful words. Our cowardice is hiding behind our talk of non violence;<br />

our fear of death is disguised by our opposition to war. But war is not going to end because we refuse<br />

to go to war. Our refusal will simply be<strong>com</strong>e an invitation to others to wage war on us. War will not<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 12 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!