Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

oshorajneesh.com
from oshorajneesh.com More from this publisher
24.04.2013 Views

CHAPTER 6. NUDITY AND CLOTHING SHOULD GO TOGETHER becomes meaningless, because freedom is indivisible. Freedom and responsibility go naturally together. If you come and hug me, surely you will feel happy about it. But it is not necessary that I should also feel the same way. Maybe I am hurt and disturbed by your hug. So if you are entitled to seek your happiness, I am equally entitled to escape being hurt. This understanding is essential for a natural, sane and healthy society to come into being. And a natural society will not have laws to be enforced with the help of magistrates, police and prisons, it will only depend on the understanding and awareness of its caring membership. You also want to know what morality is, according to me. To me, respect for another person is morality. I should respect the other person as much as I respect myself. This is the heart of morality, and under its wings it covers all other kinds of morality. Respect for the other, the same respect that I want for myself, is the cornerstone of morality. There is no morality higher than this. The day I put myself above another I become immoral. The day I consider myself to be the end and treat others as means, I turn utterly immoral. I am not moral until I truly know that each person is an end unto himself or herself. And you say that a husband can be hurt if his wife allows another person to hold her hand or to hug her. It is just possible. In fact, the institution of the husband is itself a kind of immorality. Marriage is a declaration of the fact that he has turned the woman he has married into a means for the rest of her life. It says that a man has bought a woman to establish his ownership over her. But people cannot be owned, only things can be owned. And when you own a person you reduce him or her into a thing. And this ownership over people is the worst kind of immorality. I say that marriage is immoral. While love is moral, marriage is utterly immoral. And there will be no marriages in a better world. In a better world a man and a woman will live as friends and partners for the whole of their lives, but there will be no element of a contract, a bargain, a binding, a compulsion involved in this relationship. This relationship will be wholly based on their love for each other it will be a reflection of their love and nothing else. The day love seeks the shelter of law, it courts death. Love dies the day it is turned into a contracted, legalized marriage. When I tell a woman I am entitled to receive her love because she is my wife, I am not really asking for her love, I am asserting my legal right of ownership over her. Maybe in that moment the wife is not in a loving mood, because there are moments of love and they are very few. Ordinary people cannot be in a loving state twenty-four hours a day; that is possible for rare persons who become love it self. Ordinary people cannot always be loving they have to wait for their loving moments, which are few and far between. But the law will not wait for those moments: I can tell my wife that she should love me right now, because she is my wife – and she will have to yield. And love dies the moment you are forced to love someone. And if my wife tells me that she is not in a loving mood, that she does not love me right now, legal troubles will soon arise. Most of our ethical concepts and moral laws are unnatural, arbitrary and impractical. In the name of morality we have imposed sheer impossibilities on ourselves. And it is because of them that immorality is rampant. It seems strange to say that our concept of morality itself is immoral – it is morality that breeds immorality – but it is a fact. If I love someone today, can I give him or her a promise that I will not love any other tomorrow? It is impossible to guarantee it. How can I speak Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy 112 Osho

CHAPTER 6. NUDITY AND CLOTHING SHOULD GO TOGETHER for tomorrow, which has yet to come? And how can I speak for a person I have yet to know? And if I give such a promise, troubles are bound to arise tomorrow. Tomorrow, on the scene, that person can appear who is not aware of my pledge, of my promise. Tomorrow an altogether different state of my heart-mind can arise, which will be unaware of the promise I make today. And if I fall in love with another person tomorrow, this promise, this pledge will come in the way of that love. If I fall in love with another person tomorrow – and it is not impossible – I will be faced with two alternatives. Then, on one hand, I will have to enter into a clandestine love affair, and on the other I will have to pretend to love the person I had promised to love forever. And that is what is happening all around. But isn’t it an immoral and ugly society whose true love is forced to go underground and whose false love rules the roost? So I consider marriage to be immoral. And I say it is the handiwork of an immoral society. And then marriage, in turn, gives rise to a thousand and one immoralities. Prostitution is one of them; it is a byproduct of marriage. Where people seek to make the institution of marriage strong and sacrosanct, the prostitute appears on the scene immediately. The prostitute protects the chastity of wives, like Savitri of Indian myth. If you have to save the chastity of wives the prostitute is the answer. Even a wife would prefer her husband go to a prostitute rather than fall in love with his neighbor’s wife – because love is an involvement, and so it is dangerous. A wife will be in danger if her husband falls in love with another woman, but there is no danger if he visits a brothel once in a while; her position remains safe. Prostitution does not demand involvement; you can buy it with money. Love demands deep involvement, and therefore wives consented to the institution of prostitution – but they cannot consent to love, to their husbands falling in love with another woman. When I say it, when I say that sex or love is natural and should be accepted naturally, you object to it with the plea it will put a person conditioned by moralistic upbringing and ridden with taboos into difficulty. I tell you, that person is already in deep trouble and what I am saying here can help him free himself from his difficulty. He is already beset with enough troubles and problems. Where is that man who is not in deep waters? He is really drowning. But we don’t see those troubles because they are so old and we are so used to them. If a disease is chronic we tend to forget it. What I say can create a new difficulty, not in the sense that it will really bring difficulty to you, but that it will call on you to give up your old habits, your old conditionings, which is re ally arduous. But if someday mankind consents to accept life as it is, simple, natural and spontaneous; if people give up imposing unnatural and impossible moralities on themselves, which are anything but moral, then hundreds of thousands of Krishnas will walk this earth. Then the whole earth will be covered with Krishnas. Lastly, you want to know why Krishna has been described in many colors. Really, he was a man of many colors. He was a colorful man. He cannot be presented in a single color; he was really multicolored. The color of his skin cannot be more than one, but his life, of course, has all the colors of the rainbow. And a lot depends on the quality of the eyes with which you see him. In fact, you see him in the color of your own perception. A single person takes on different colors and also sees different colors in different states of mind because a single person is not really the same in different states of his heart-mind. I take on a Krishna: The Man and His Philosophy 113 Osho

CHAPTER 6. NUDITY AND CLOTHING SHOULD GO TOGETHER<br />

for tomorrow, which has yet to <strong>com</strong>e? And how can I speak for a person I have yet to know? And if<br />

I give such a promise, troubles are bound to arise tomorrow. Tomorrow, on the scene, that person<br />

can appear who is not aware of my pledge, of my promise. Tomorrow an altogether different state<br />

of my heart-mind can arise, which will be unaware of the promise I make today. And if I fall in love<br />

with another person tomorrow, this promise, this pledge will <strong>com</strong>e in the way of that love.<br />

If I fall in love with another person tomorrow – <strong>and</strong> it is not impossible – I will be faced with two<br />

alternatives. <strong>The</strong>n, on one h<strong>and</strong>, I will have to enter into a cl<strong>and</strong>estine love affair, <strong>and</strong> on the other I<br />

will have to pretend to love the person I had promised to love forever. And that is what is happening<br />

all around. But isn’t it an immoral <strong>and</strong> ugly society whose true love is forced to go underground <strong>and</strong><br />

whose false love rules the roost?<br />

So I consider marriage to be immoral. And I say it is the h<strong>and</strong>iwork of an immoral society. And<br />

then marriage, in turn, gives rise to a thous<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> one immoralities. Prostitution is one of them;<br />

it is a byproduct of marriage. Where people seek to make the institution of marriage strong <strong>and</strong><br />

sacrosanct, the prostitute appears on the scene immediately.<br />

<strong>The</strong> prostitute protects the chastity of wives, like Savitri of Indian myth. If you have to save the<br />

chastity of wives the prostitute is the answer. Even a wife would prefer her husb<strong>and</strong> go to a<br />

prostitute rather than fall in love with his neighbor’s wife – because love is an involvement, <strong>and</strong><br />

so it is dangerous. A wife will be in danger if her husb<strong>and</strong> falls in love with another woman, but there<br />

is no danger if he visits a brothel once in a while; her position remains safe. Prostitution does not<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> involvement; you can buy it with money. Love dem<strong>and</strong>s deep involvement, <strong>and</strong> therefore<br />

wives consented to the institution of prostitution – but they cannot consent to love, to their husb<strong>and</strong>s<br />

falling in love with another woman.<br />

When I say it, when I say that sex or love is natural <strong>and</strong> should be accepted naturally, you object to<br />

it with the plea it will put a person conditioned by moralistic upbringing <strong>and</strong> ridden with taboos into<br />

difficulty. I tell you, that person is already in deep trouble <strong>and</strong> what I am saying here can help him<br />

free himself from his difficulty. He is already beset with enough troubles <strong>and</strong> problems. Where is<br />

that man who is not in deep waters? He is really drowning. But we don’t see those troubles because<br />

they are so old <strong>and</strong> we are so used to them. If a disease is chronic we tend to forget it. What I say<br />

can create a new difficulty, not in the sense that it will really bring difficulty to you, but that it will call<br />

on you to give up your old habits, your old conditionings, which is re ally arduous.<br />

But if someday mankind consents to accept life as it is, simple, natural <strong>and</strong> spontaneous; if people<br />

give up imposing unnatural <strong>and</strong> impossible moralities on themselves, which are anything but moral,<br />

then hundreds of thous<strong>and</strong>s of <strong>Krishna</strong>s will walk this earth. <strong>The</strong>n the whole earth will be covered<br />

with <strong>Krishna</strong>s.<br />

Lastly, you want to know why <strong>Krishna</strong> has been described in many colors. Really, he was a man<br />

of many colors. He was a colorful man. He cannot be presented in a single color; he was really<br />

multicolored. <strong>The</strong> color of his skin cannot be more than one, but his life, of course, has all the colors<br />

of the rainbow. And a lot depends on the quality of the eyes with which you see him. In fact, you see<br />

him in the color of your own perception.<br />

A single person takes on different colors <strong>and</strong> also sees different colors in different states of mind<br />

because a single person is not really the same in different states of his heart-mind. I take on a<br />

<strong>Krishna</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Man</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>His</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> 113 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!