Carr, R. K., 1995a. - Biological Sciences
Carr, R. K., 1995a. - Biological Sciences
Carr, R. K., 1995a. - Biological Sciences
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
-101<br />
or open window" for their early radiation. Within the Famennian there is clear evidence of direct<br />
predator-prey interactions and apparent competition for other resources. Much of placoderm evolution<br />
revolved around specializations on a basic plan with retention of a relatively primitive<br />
placoderm suspensorium and vertebrate locomotor pattern (see discussion below). In contrast,<br />
chondrichthyans and actinopterygians evolved a number of innovations associated with feeding<br />
and locomotion which have been well documented (e.g. SCHAEFFER, 1975; ZANGERL, 198 I;<br />
LAUDER, 1982; WEBB, 1982; LUND et ai., 1984). With the rapid increase in diversity among<br />
actinopterygians and chondrichthyans after the Frasnian-Famennian extinc;;tion event, it is proposed<br />
that these forms may have competitively displaced contemporaneous placoderms; however,<br />
the suggested presence of a major Famennian-Tournaisian extinction event is consistent with a<br />
model of opportunistic replacement by surviving actinopterygians and chondrichthyans. Tests of<br />
this hypothesis must await detailed basinal and regional faunal analyses. Current field work and<br />
review of the open basin faunas associated with the Catskill Delta and Michigan Basin may<br />
shed light on the history and extinction of placoderms in the Upper Devonian.<br />
PACHYOSTEOMORPH DIVERSITY PATTERNS<br />
Among pachyosteomorph arthrodires, the aspinothoracid subclade accounts for 50% of all<br />
described pachyosteomorph species. Remaining pachyosteomorphs comprise the Dunkleosteidae<br />
(and possibly Panxiosteidae). Aspinothoracid arthrodires first appeared in the Upper Givetian<br />
with an apparent increase in species diversity until the Frasnian-Famennian extinction episode.<br />
The Laurasian record for aspinothoracids includes Lagerstatten on both sides of the extinction<br />
episode suggesting the Frasnian peak does not represent a sampling bias. Each Lagerstatten<br />
(Upper Frasnian KelJwasserkalk of the Manticoceras beds of Bad Wildungen, Germany, and<br />
Late Famennian Cleveland Shale, northern Ohio, USA) represents similar deep water sedimentary<br />
environments which suggest potentially similar taphonomic processes. There is no data available<br />
for Devonian stage-level sediment volumes and surface exposures. RONOV (1980) provides series-level<br />
global data which indicates equivalent sediment volumes and areas for the Middle and<br />
Upper Devonian. However, differences in estimated duration (HARLAND ef ai., 1989) suggest a<br />
potential sampling bias in favor of Frasnian sediments, but SEPKOSKI (/991) has pointed out<br />
that ages for the Devonian stage boundaries are poorly constrained and time averaging may be<br />
omitted until better estimates are available (HARLAND et ai., 1989, note a high level of uncertainty<br />
for estimating the lower boundary date for each Upper Devonian stage. They note an error of<br />
plus or minus an amount equal to or greater than the duration of the stage). During the Famennian,<br />
there was little if any numerical recovery of diversity at the species level following the Frasnian<br />
Famennian extinction event. However, among arthrodires there was a secondary radiation associated<br />
with habitat utilization, feeding structures, food acquisition, and locomotor patterns.<br />
Aspects of this radiation are seen clearly in the Late Famennian Cleveland Shale (auna of North<br />
America with its morphologically diverse assemblage of aspinothoracid arthrodires. The question<br />
then arises: what might account for this apparent increase in pachyosteomorph diversity? Two<br />
major adaptive aspects of the phenotype are associated with feeding and locomotion. It is difficult<br />
to determine the prey of most placoderms, but the biological role, in mechanical terms, of the<br />
structures associated with feeding and locomotion can be evaluated. An analysis of potential<br />
functional consequences of evolutionary changes in feeding morphologies must consider both