24.04.2013 Views

Carr, R. K., 1995a. - Biological Sciences

Carr, R. K., 1995a. - Biological Sciences

Carr, R. K., 1995a. - Biological Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-101­<br />

or open window" for their early radiation. Within the Famennian there is clear evidence of direct<br />

predator-prey interactions and apparent competition for other resources. Much of placoderm evolution<br />

revolved around specializations on a basic plan with retention of a relatively primitive<br />

placoderm suspensorium and vertebrate locomotor pattern (see discussion below). In contrast,<br />

chondrichthyans and actinopterygians evolved a number of innovations associated with feeding<br />

and locomotion which have been well documented (e.g. SCHAEFFER, 1975; ZANGERL, 198 I;<br />

LAUDER, 1982; WEBB, 1982; LUND et ai., 1984). With the rapid increase in diversity among<br />

actinopterygians and chondrichthyans after the Frasnian-Famennian extinc;;tion event, it is proposed<br />

that these forms may have competitively displaced contemporaneous placoderms; however,<br />

the suggested presence of a major Famennian-Tournaisian extinction event is consistent with a<br />

model of opportunistic replacement by surviving actinopterygians and chondrichthyans. Tests of<br />

this hypothesis must await detailed basinal and regional faunal analyses. Current field work and<br />

review of the open basin faunas associated with the Catskill Delta and Michigan Basin may<br />

shed light on the history and extinction of placoderms in the Upper Devonian.<br />

PACHYOSTEOMORPH DIVERSITY PATTERNS<br />

Among pachyosteomorph arthrodires, the aspinothoracid subclade accounts for 50% of all<br />

described pachyosteomorph species. Remaining pachyosteomorphs comprise the Dunkleosteidae<br />

(and possibly Panxiosteidae). Aspinothoracid arthrodires first appeared in the Upper Givetian<br />

with an apparent increase in species diversity until the Frasnian-Famennian extinction episode.<br />

The Laurasian record for aspinothoracids includes Lagerstatten on both sides of the extinction<br />

episode suggesting the Frasnian peak does not represent a sampling bias. Each Lagerstatten<br />

(Upper Frasnian KelJwasserkalk of the Manticoceras beds of Bad Wildungen, Germany, and<br />

Late Famennian Cleveland Shale, northern Ohio, USA) represents similar deep water sedimentary<br />

environments which suggest potentially similar taphonomic processes. There is no data available<br />

for Devonian stage-level sediment volumes and surface exposures. RONOV (1980) provides series-level<br />

global data which indicates equivalent sediment volumes and areas for the Middle and<br />

Upper Devonian. However, differences in estimated duration (HARLAND ef ai., 1989) suggest a<br />

potential sampling bias in favor of Frasnian sediments, but SEPKOSKI (/991) has pointed out<br />

that ages for the Devonian stage boundaries are poorly constrained and time averaging may be<br />

omitted until better estimates are available (HARLAND et ai., 1989, note a high level of uncertainty<br />

for estimating the lower boundary date for each Upper Devonian stage. They note an error of<br />

plus or minus an amount equal to or greater than the duration of the stage). During the Famennian,<br />

there was little if any numerical recovery of diversity at the species level following the Frasnian­<br />

Famennian extinction event. However, among arthrodires there was a secondary radiation associated<br />

with habitat utilization, feeding structures, food acquisition, and locomotor patterns.<br />

Aspects of this radiation are seen clearly in the Late Famennian Cleveland Shale (auna of North<br />

America with its morphologically diverse assemblage of aspinothoracid arthrodires. The question<br />

then arises: what might account for this apparent increase in pachyosteomorph diversity? Two<br />

major adaptive aspects of the phenotype are associated with feeding and locomotion. It is difficult<br />

to determine the prey of most placoderms, but the biological role, in mechanical terms, of the<br />

structures associated with feeding and locomotion can be evaluated. An analysis of potential<br />

functional consequences of evolutionary changes in feeding morphologies must consider both

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!