24.04.2013 Views

Carr, R. K., 1995a. - Biological Sciences

Carr, R. K., 1995a. - Biological Sciences

Carr, R. K., 1995a. - Biological Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-100­<br />

clades of gnathostomes maintain stable levels. The Frasnian-Famennian boundary coincides with<br />

declines in all placoderm orders discussed here, but one (low diversity phyllolepids), and a continuing<br />

decline in acanthodians. At the Famennian-Tournaisian boundary, there was a major diversity<br />

increase for chondrichthyans and actinopterygians. Coincident with this increase was a<br />

decline among rhipidistians, dipnoans, and remaining placoderms. MCGHEE (1988) noted the<br />

importance of temporal resolution in evaluating the timing of events in the fossil record; however,<br />

resolution problems still exist and the relative timing of the osteichthyan radiation and placoderm<br />

decline is not clear. This is demonstrated by the epoch level resolution for sarcopterygian diversity.<br />

which limits any analysis of the Frasnian-Famennian extinction event for this clade.<br />

WILLIAMS (1990) provided direct evidence for the interaction among Late Famennian<br />

gnathostomes within the Cleveland Shale fauna. He documented evidence for predator-prey relationships<br />

among piscivorous members of the fauna concluding (p. 287) simply that "the big<br />

fish ate the little ones," suggesting a general absence of prey selectivity. Additionally, there was<br />

potenti\ll competition among durophages with independent evolution of durophagous feeding<br />

structures in placoderms (e.g. Ptyctodontida, Mylostomatidae), dipnoans, and chondrichthyans<br />

(e.g. Orodus). By the end of the Mississippian, a number of holocephalan and elasmobranch<br />

durophages had evolved (ZANGERL, 1981; CARROLL, 1988). AdditionaJly, VERMEIJ (1987) noted<br />

a doubling of marine durophagous families of eurypterid and crustacean arthropods, cephalopod<br />

molluscs, and vertebrates between the Middle and Upper Devonian.<br />

The above findings suggest that the Frasnian-Famennian extinction episode was critical in<br />

the initial evolution of actinopterygians and chondrichthyans providing a so-called "opportunity<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

A<br />

0 0<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

PRO GED SIG EMS ElF GIV FRS FAMTOU VIS NAM CJ) ::::!:=> LL ::::!:=> > ::::!:=> CJ) :E=> ::::!: ::::!:=> =><br />

::::!: W a a: « 0<br />

SIL I DEV I CARB w LL LL I­<br />

-.J ...J<br />

-.J -.J -.J<br />

DEV CARB<br />

FIG. 10. - A, a comparison of stage-level generic diversity for major gnathostome clades: placoderms (squares), acanthodians<br />

(circles), osteichthyans (diamonds), and chondrichthyans (triangles). S, eubrachythoracid substage-level generic diversity: coccosteomorph<br />

arthrodires (squares) and pachyosleomorph arthrodires (circles). Note the decline of coccosteomorph arthrodires<br />

prior to the FRS-FAM extinction event.<br />

A, Courbe de comparaison de la diversile des groupes majeurs de Gnalhostomes en fonction des etages geologiques: Placodermes<br />

(carres), acanlhodiens (eercles), oSleiehthyens (Iosanges) el ehondriehthyens (Iriangles). E, meme eourbe pour les<br />

EubraehYlhoraei en fonelion des sous-hages: Arlhrodires coccosleomorphes (carres), Arthrodires paehyosreomorphes (eerdes).<br />

Remarquez Ie declin des coccosteomorphes a partir de l'evenement Frasnien-Famennien..<br />

B

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!