24.04.2013 Views

secondary cells with lithium anodes and immobilized fused_salt

secondary cells with lithium anodes and immobilized fused_salt

secondary cells with lithium anodes and immobilized fused_salt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102.<br />

volume <strong>and</strong> then by pumping to a few microns pressure; this treatment would also<br />

remove F20. The sample was then warmed cautiously to decompose the F2@4 to<br />

F2@2; the O2 released was measured gasometrically. This oreration was carried<br />

out most successfully by removing the liquid nitrogen bath until a small increase<br />

in pressure was observed, replacing the liquid nitrogen, <strong>and</strong> repeating<br />

the process until the F202 could be melted (113°K) <strong>with</strong>out further oxygen<br />

evolution. The oxygen thus evolved i.as mass spectrometrically free of F2<br />

(hsiever, this was not a very sensitive test because the mass spectrometer<br />

inlet system vas somewhat reactive <strong>with</strong> small uantities of fluorine). The<br />

blood-red liquid F202 was then frozen at 77°K ?orange solid) <strong>and</strong> the residual<br />

O2 was pumped away. Subsequent remelting at 113°K resulted in no further re-<br />

' lease of OP. The sample was then warmed slowly to room temperature to decompose<br />

the F202 <strong>and</strong> measure the F2 + 02.<br />

This procedure was occasionally unsuccessful in cases <strong>with</strong> the initial<br />

mole ratio F2/02 of 1.0 or 3.0, because a minor explosion ("pop") would be heard<br />

dwing the decomposition of F2O4, accompanied by a sudden rise in pressure.<br />

The gasmetric data indicated that in these cases some of the F202 was decom-<br />

posed during the sudden decomposition of F204. Because of this, the apparent<br />

yields of F& <strong>and</strong> F202 reported in Table 1 are taken only from experiments in<br />

vhich there vas no audible evidence of explosion. Nevertheless, the reported<br />

yields of F204 may be slightly too high in some cases because of sane decomposi-<br />

tion of F202 during the decomposition of F204.<br />

The data reported in Table 1 show several unusual features. First,<br />

in the mixtures Containing only F2 <strong>and</strong> 02, the number of millimoles of oxygen<br />

converted to F202 ard F204 remain nearly constant despite a large variation in<br />

the initial ratio of F2 to 02, even when the major part of the oxygen was<br />

consumed. The G-value for products also remained constant at a value that is<br />

several-fol higher than the values that are usually found for non-chain<br />

conditions involves a short chain process that is initiated <strong>with</strong> approximately<br />

equal efficiency whether the initial absorption of energy is done by oxygen or<br />

by fluorine.<br />

These observations suggest that the formation of F202 under these<br />

,<br />

Another observation is that the ratio of F20 to F202 in the products<br />

displays no obvious trend vith the initial ratio of F2f02. The possible chain<br />

L F. 1 F2 1 F2 1 F2<br />

F2 F202 + F. F204 + F. F2@o + Fa<br />

'muld not lead to these results in a hcmogeneous system, but the kinetics are<br />

probably conplicated by the fact that the products precipitate as solids.<br />

The experiments in which the reactants were diluted <strong>with</strong> argon show<br />

that the presence of argon ha6 a small positive effect on the total conversion<br />

of oxygen, whereas dilution <strong>with</strong> citrogen does not appear to effect the yield.<br />

Some energy transfer from argon seems icdicated.<br />

a) G for ion pair formation is'expected to be about 4; for radicals it often<br />

ranges fran 6-10.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!