24.04.2013 Views

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Seedling Ecology <strong>of</strong> Mixed-Dipterocarp Forest<br />

Work has been done on dipterocarp germination<br />

mostly during the 1970s and 80s. Many studies <strong>of</strong><br />

dipterocarp species reported them to be recalcitrant<br />

(Jensen 1971, Tang 1971, Tang and Tamari 1973, Tamari<br />

1976). Chapter 3 gives a more detailed <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

dipterocarp germination. Other studies suggested that<br />

many non-dipterocarp species, mostly pioneers, had<br />

dormant seed buried in the soil that germinated with a<br />

marked increase in radiation at the ground surface (Liew<br />

1973, Aminuddin and Ng 1983, Raich and Gong 1990).<br />

However, unlike the neotropics (see work by Vazquez-<br />

Yanes and Orozco Segovia 1984, Garwood 1996), no<br />

critical experiments have focused on this buried seed<br />

phenomenon. Also, relatively few studies have<br />

comprehensively evaluated patterns <strong>of</strong> germination <strong>for</strong><br />

the whole <strong>for</strong>est in relation to successional status and<br />

taxonomy (Ng 1983). This is perhaps because past<br />

research has focused on the autecology <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

dipterocarp species. Future work should focus on<br />

clarifying the germination mechanisms <strong>of</strong> mixeddipterocarp<br />

<strong>for</strong>est tree species in general and the role<br />

dipterocarp species play within it. Little work has focused<br />

on the competitive interactions between <strong>dipterocarps</strong> and<br />

non-<strong>dipterocarps</strong> and yet they are <strong>of</strong> direct relevance to<br />

the maintenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>dipterocarps</strong> in a managed <strong>for</strong>est.<br />

Early Survival and Establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

Dipterocarps<br />

The main research objective early in this century was to<br />

develop a method <strong>for</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> regeneration stocking<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e logging (Wyatt-Smith 1963). The survey<br />

techniques that developed were usually based on line<br />

transects that assessed stocking by measures <strong>of</strong><br />

dipterocarp seedling distribution and number. Surveys<br />

revealed that the abundance <strong>of</strong> regeneration was<br />

associated with certain dipterocarp species and sites. In<br />

many circumstances regeneration was absent particularly<br />

on the slopes <strong>of</strong> hill <strong>for</strong>ests and where competing<br />

understorey palms, shrubs and herbs were present<br />

(Burgess 1975, Wong 1981, Kusneti 1992). Though<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> distribution are important to gauge adequate<br />

and even coverage <strong>of</strong> seedling establishment within a<br />

stand, measures <strong>of</strong> seedling number and density do not<br />

necessarily predict successful establishment. A measure<br />

that incorporates an estimate <strong>of</strong> seedling vigour is needed.<br />

More recent studies have used different size classes and<br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> leaf area to gauge vigour, promoting survey<br />

90<br />

techniques that discard seedlings in the ‘less vigourous<br />

classes’ <strong>for</strong> a representation <strong>of</strong> regeneration stocking<br />

(Ashton 1990). These can be useful measures <strong>for</strong> most<br />

dipterocarp species because they have poor ability to<br />

sprout. Measures <strong>of</strong> their above-ground per<strong>for</strong>mance can<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e be used to predict future growth and survival.<br />

Studies by Nicholson (1960) and others (Fox 1972,<br />

1973, Liew and Wong 1973, Tomboc and Basada 1978,<br />

Appanah and Manaf 1994) elucidated the cyclic nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> population recruitment and survival in the groundstorey<br />

<strong>of</strong> a closed <strong>for</strong>est and demonstrated the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

advanced regeneration in the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> a seedling bank <strong>for</strong><br />

the successful establishment <strong>of</strong> new <strong>for</strong>est stands.<br />

Conceptual models <strong>of</strong> the regeneration dynamic have<br />

been developed that explicitly suggest the importance and<br />

reliance <strong>of</strong> mixed-dipterocarp <strong>for</strong>est on advance<br />

regeneration (see Fig. 1). This reliance is not only <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>dipterocarps</strong> but also <strong>for</strong> late successional canopy trees<br />

that are non masting, subcanopy trees and shrub species.<br />

Forest management should there<strong>for</strong>e focus on advanced<br />

regeneration <strong>of</strong> dipterocarp trees and similar associates.<br />

These are the trees that are the canopy dominants during<br />

the mid and late stages <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>est succession. They,<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e, create the basic <strong>for</strong>est structure beneath which<br />

other strata exist, and reflect the changes in composition<br />

associated with differences in site quality.<br />

Studies have also shown that dipterocarp species<br />

could be broadly categorised as shade-tolerant or lightdemanding<br />

based on differences in frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

recruitment and rate <strong>of</strong> seedling death. Shade-tolerant<br />

<strong>dipterocarps</strong> can have seedlings established beneath<br />

closed canopied <strong>for</strong>est <strong>for</strong> long periods <strong>of</strong> time (> 10<br />

years). Mast years <strong>for</strong> shade-tolerant <strong>dipterocarps</strong> can<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e be fewer than relatively more light-demanding<br />

<strong>dipterocarps</strong> but still provide adequate advance<br />

regeneration establishment (Wyatt-Smith 1963, Fox 1972,<br />

Gong 1981). In general, however, all <strong>dipterocarps</strong> have<br />

cohorts <strong>of</strong> seedlings that continually replenish the seedling<br />

bank from successful mast years. Over time, seedlings<br />

die primarily from the very low light regimes <strong>of</strong> a closed<br />

<strong>for</strong>est canopy (Ashton 1995). Groundstorey levels <strong>of</strong><br />

photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) beneath the<br />

canopy <strong>of</strong> a mixed-dipterocarp <strong>for</strong>est have <strong>of</strong>ten been<br />

recorded as less than 1% <strong>of</strong> that received in the open<br />

(Torquebiau 1988, Ashton 1992a).<br />

Other studies have also suggested the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

an increase in amounts <strong>of</strong> PAR that promotes only partial<br />

shade <strong>for</strong> dipterocarp germination and early survival

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!