A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Seed Physiology 62<br />
Table 3. Relationship between germination and moisture content during desiccation (Tompsett and Kemp 1996a, b)*.<br />
Species Lowest-safe moisture<br />
content values<br />
(percentage)**<br />
*: Results can be summarised by regression as a straight line if<br />
germination percentage is first trans<strong>for</strong>med into probits;<br />
The basis <strong>of</strong> desiccation damage<br />
If the basic causes <strong>of</strong> desiccation damage could be<br />
determined, a way might be found to reduce the effect,<br />
thus enabling better survival <strong>of</strong> the seed. In this<br />
connection, Nautiyal and Purohit (1985b, c) assessed<br />
various factors <strong>for</strong> S. robusta seed. The quantity <strong>of</strong><br />
nutrients leaking from the seed increased as moisture<br />
content (and germination ability) declined; it was<br />
Slope <strong>of</strong> probit line (probits<br />
per unit <strong>of</strong> moisture content<br />
percentage)<br />
Intercept <strong>of</strong> probit line<br />
(probit percentage<br />
germination)<br />
Shorea leprosula 26 n/a n/a<br />
Shorea argentifolia 28 0.1814 -3.5780<br />
Shorea ferruginea 29 0.1912 -4.8300<br />
Hopea ferrea 30 0.1050 -3.5660<br />
Hopea mengerawan 30 0.1400 -3.6700<br />
Hopea foxworthyi 31 0.0994 -2.5555<br />
Hopea odorata 32 0.1303 -3.6450<br />
Shorea parvifolia 32 n/a n/a<br />
Shorea roxburghii 32 0.1000 -2.7700<br />
Shorea obtusa 33 0.0660 -2.4420<br />
Shorea ovalis 33 0.1816 -5.0550<br />
Cotylelobium melanoxylon 34 0.1303 -3.1790<br />
Vatica mangachapoi 34 0.0919 -3.4460<br />
Cotylelobium burckii 35 0.1400 -3.2200<br />
Parashorea smythiesii 35 0.1743 -4.9920<br />
Shorea macrophylla 35 0.0978 -2.6190<br />
Shorea trapezifolia 37 n/a n/a<br />
Dipterocarpus costatus 38 0.0789 -1.9360<br />
Dipterocarpus obtusifolius 38 0.0584 -2.2470<br />
Dipterocarpus zeylanicus 38 0.1427 -3.8090<br />
Shorea fallax 38 0.0869 -2.2470<br />
Shorea macroptera 38 0.0867 -4.2300<br />
Parashorea tomentella 40 0.2000 -7.1400<br />
Shorea amplexicaulis 40 0.1307 -5.5600<br />
Shorea congestiflora 40 0.0904 -3.6510<br />
Shorea robusta 40 0.1300 -4.2200<br />
Vatica odorata ssp. odorata 41 0.0961 -3.6290<br />
Shorea affinis 42 0.0475 -1.6120<br />
Shorea almon 42 0.1400 -5.4700<br />
Shorea leptoderma 42 0.0460 -2.5280<br />
Dipterocarpus turbinatus 43 0.1300 -5.5300<br />
Dryobalanops lanceolata 43 0.1200 -6.0400<br />
Dryobalanops keithii 50 0.1233 -5.0770<br />
Parashorea malaanonan 50 0.0965 -3.9830<br />
**: LSMC <strong>for</strong> seeds dried at 10-15% relative humidity and 15-<br />
20°C.<br />
concluded that cellular membranes in the seed had lost<br />
their semi-permeability. However, whether the apparent<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> semi-permeability was a primary result <strong>of</strong><br />
desiccation, or whether it was one aspect <strong>of</strong> a general<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> metabolic capability could not be distinguished<br />
from the data obtained. A small decline in the absolute<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> nutrients in the seed was observed, but<br />
the significance <strong>of</strong> this decline was not clear. Protein