A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Conservation <strong>of</strong> Genetic Resources in the dipterocarpaceae 50<br />
Genetic Diversity Within and Among Populations<br />
The existence <strong>of</strong> self-incompatibility and high<br />
outcrossing rates suggest that populations <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>dipterocarps</strong> should harbour high levels <strong>of</strong> genetic<br />
variation. Indeed, recent studies, based on analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
variation at isozyme loci, have revealed considerable<br />
genetic variation in natural populations. A high level <strong>of</strong><br />
enzymatic polymorphism in natural populations <strong>of</strong><br />
Shorea leprosula was first detected by Gan et al. (1977).<br />
More recently, genetic diversity within and among<br />
populations <strong>of</strong> several species <strong>of</strong> Hopea (Wickneswari<br />
et al. 1994), Shorea (Harada et al. 1994),<br />
Stemonoporus (Murawski and Bawa 1994, Dayanandan<br />
and Bawa, unpublished data) has been quantified. Genetic<br />
diversity in many Malaysian species <strong>of</strong> Hopea and<br />
Shorea were studied using Random Amplified<br />
Polymorphic DNAs (RAPD). Considerable variation was<br />
found both within and among populations. The level <strong>of</strong><br />
diversity in species <strong>of</strong> Hopea (Wickneswari et al. 1996)<br />
was less than in species <strong>of</strong> Shorea (Harada et al. 1994).<br />
In these studies, methods to characterise genetic<br />
diversity depended upon several assumptions about the<br />
segregation and homology <strong>of</strong> bands. Moreover, results<br />
from most RAPD surveys cannot be compared with those<br />
obtained from isozyme surveys because dominance at<br />
RAPD ‘loci’ makes it impossible to distinguish<br />
heterozygotes from homozygotes. Thus, genetic diversity<br />
cannot be characterised in conventional terms. Bawa and<br />
his associates have used isozymes to estimate genetic<br />
diversity in species <strong>of</strong> Stemonoporus and Shorea. In<br />
Stemonoporus oblongifolius, the percent <strong>of</strong><br />
polymorphic loci range from 89% to 100%, the average<br />
number <strong>of</strong> alleles per polymorphic locus is 3.1 and mean<br />
genetic diversity <strong>for</strong> the species is 0.297. The number<br />
<strong>of</strong> loci sampled was 9 and was the same sampled <strong>for</strong> other<br />
<strong>dipterocarps</strong> and tropical trees. The estimates <strong>of</strong> genetic<br />
diversity are among the highest reported <strong>for</strong> plant species<br />
(Murawski and Bawa 1994). The values <strong>for</strong> the above<br />
parameters are lower <strong>for</strong> Shorea trapezifolia, but remain<br />
toward the higher end <strong>of</strong> the value reported <strong>for</strong> tropical<br />
trees. Similarly, a high level <strong>of</strong> genetic variation has been<br />
observed in Shorea megistophylla (Murawski et al.<br />
1994b) and several other species <strong>of</strong> Stemonoporus<br />
(Murawski and Bawa, unpublished). Wickneswari et al.<br />
(1994) also report high levels <strong>of</strong> variation in Hopea<br />
odorata on the basis <strong>of</strong> isozyme studies.<br />
Inter-population differentiation on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />
isozyme surveys has been studied in only three species:<br />
Stemonoporus oblongifolius (Murawski and Bawa<br />
1994), Shorea trapezifolia (Dayanandan and Bawa, in<br />
preparation) and Hopea odorata (Wickneswari et al.<br />
1994). In all cases, there is a high level <strong>of</strong> variation among<br />
populations. In Stemonoporus oblongifolius, the mean Gst<br />
value, which is a measure <strong>of</strong> population differentiation,<br />
is 0.16. In other words, 16% <strong>of</strong> total genetic diversity is<br />
due to differences among populations. Interestingly, the<br />
distance among sampled populations ranged from 1.3 to<br />
9.7 km. Thus, populations seem to differ over a relatively<br />
small spatial scale. In Shorea trapezifolia too the Gst value<br />
was high (0.11); in this case the most distant were<br />
separated by 43.5 km. The mean genetic distance between<br />
populations in Hopea odorata was 0.10 (Wickneswari et<br />
al. 1994).<br />
The high level <strong>of</strong> genetic differentiation could be due<br />
to either restricted gene flow or local selection. Direct<br />
observations <strong>of</strong> gene flow in <strong>dipterocarps</strong> are lacking.<br />
Seed dispersal in Stemonoporus oblongifolius seems to<br />
be passive; the one seeded, heavy, resinous fruit drop<br />
under the maternal tree and the seed germinates without<br />
being removed by any disperser (Murawski and Bawa<br />
1994). In Shorea trapezifolia, the seeds are dispersed by<br />
gyration, assisted by wind with most seeds falling within<br />
the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the parent. Gyration <strong>of</strong> fruits, referred to<br />
earlier, may have evolved as an adaptation to restrict<br />
dispersal to the sites in which the parents are found. Thus,<br />
gene dispersal via seeds in both species does not generally<br />
occur over large distances.<br />
The degree <strong>of</strong> gene dispersal via pollen would depend<br />
upon the pollinators. Medium sized to large bees should<br />
be able to bring about long-distance dispersal more<br />
frequently than small bees or thrips. Both Stemonoporus<br />
oblongifolius and Shorea trapezifolia are pollinated by<br />
medium-sized bees (Apis spp.).<br />
Gene dispersal has been indirectly measured in<br />
Shorea trapezifolia (more than one migrant per<br />
generation). Nm estimates the degree <strong>of</strong> migration<br />
between populations, and a value <strong>of</strong> Nm>1 is enough to<br />
prevent population differentiation due to drift <strong>for</strong> neutral<br />
loci (Wright 1931, Maruyama 1970, Slatkin and<br />
Maruyama 1975). In S. trapezifolia, the value <strong>of</strong> Nm is<br />
1.62. This high value indicates that differentiation in S.<br />
trapezifolia is not due to restricted gene flow.<br />
Ashton (1982, 1988) has shown that congeneric<br />
species in the family <strong>of</strong>ten occupy different edaphic zones.<br />
Moreover, within the same habitat related species may<br />
be differentiated along environmental gradients that