A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Biogeography and Evolutionary Systematics <strong>of</strong> Dipterocarpaceae<br />
the herbarium collections <strong>of</strong> Asia (Forest <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute Malaysia, Kepong including Symington’s<br />
collection; Bogor in Indonesia, Peradeniya in Sri Lanka,<br />
Bangkok in Thailand) and Europe (Kew in U.K, Paris and<br />
Lyon in France, Leiden in Netherlands) where large<br />
collections including Ashton’s, Meijer’s, and Maury’s,<br />
are preserved.<br />
There is a certain complementarity in the above<br />
works, but a synthetic classification integrating all<br />
previous results is still not available. Traditional and<br />
modern approaches will have to be integrated, including<br />
DNA and mathematical analyses, as well as the use <strong>of</strong><br />
computer systems <strong>for</strong> determination and treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
the data.<br />
Main aspects <strong>of</strong> Maury-Lechon’s classification (see<br />
also Tables 1, 2, 8)<br />
The taxonomical levels have intentionally been left<br />
without <strong>for</strong>mal definition to serve as a base <strong>for</strong> further<br />
research. The relative position <strong>of</strong> these levels is much<br />
more important than their names. However, to facilitate<br />
the explanations, the more proximal names usually<br />
adopted <strong>for</strong> these divisions were used (Maury-Lechon<br />
1979a).<br />
The separation <strong>of</strong> Monotoid taxa from the<br />
Dipterocarpaceae underlines the differences that<br />
introduce heterogeneity when these taxa are put together<br />
with the Asian group in the same family. The grouping <strong>of</strong><br />
Monotaceae and Dipterocarpaceae in a supra-familial<br />
joint division (order or suborder), reminds the greater<br />
affinities <strong>of</strong> these two families among the other<br />
angiosperms. All the other groups aim to underline the<br />
closer resemblances on the basis <strong>of</strong> living biological,<br />
morphological and anatomical characters <strong>of</strong> the<br />
successive ontogenic phases (mainly fruit-seed, embryo,<br />
seedling) and the pollen types and structures.<br />
The characters <strong>of</strong> embryo-seedlings and pollens<br />
strongly emphasise the particular position <strong>of</strong><br />
Anthoshorea close to Doona and partly to Pentacme<br />
within the Anthoshorinae group, and their position near<br />
Hopea and Neobalanocarpus in the Imbricate group.<br />
Still stronger relations exist with the intermediary<br />
genus Dryobalanops leading directly to the Valvate<br />
group. Tighter connections <strong>of</strong> the latter genus occur<br />
within the Dipterocarpae subgroup (Dipterocarpus and<br />
Anisoptera) as well as with the Vaticae subgroup through<br />
Sunaptinae taxa first (Cotylelobium mainly, Sunaptea<br />
too), and then to Stemonoporus. Through Dryobalanops<br />
Taxonomical levels<br />
Supra-family<br />
level (1) (order<br />
or sub-order):<br />
Dipterocarpales (2 families)<br />
Family level Monotaceae (3 genera:<br />
(2):<br />
Pakaraimaea, Marquesia,<br />
Monotes)<br />
Dipterocarpaceae (2 infra-family<br />
groups: sub-families, 4 sub-groups:<br />
tribes, 9 sub-subgroups: sub-tribes,<br />
19 genera)<br />
Sub-family Imbricate [2 tribes (a & b), 3 sub-<br />
level (2):<br />
tribes, 9 genera, 19 sections]<br />
Valvate [2 tribes (c & d), 7 subtribes,<br />
10 genera, 8 sections]<br />
Tribe level (4): a) Hopeae (2 genera, 4 sections):<br />
Hopea (4 sections),<br />
Neobalanocarpus<br />
b) Shoreae (3 sub-tribes, 7 genera, 15<br />
sections):<br />
Anthoshorinae (3 genera): Doona,<br />
Pentacme, Anthoshorea (2<br />
sections)<br />
Shorinae (3 genera): Shorea (2<br />
sections), Richetia (2 sections),<br />
Rubroshorea (7 sections)<br />
Parashorinae (1 genera):<br />
Parashorea (2 sections)<br />
c) Dipterocarpae (2 sub-tribes, 3<br />
genera, 2 sections):<br />
Dryobalanoinae (1 genus):<br />
Dryobalanops<br />
Dipterocarpinae (2 genera):<br />
Dipterocarpus, Anisoptera (2<br />
sections)<br />
d) Vaticae (5 sub-tribes, 7 genera, 6<br />
sections):<br />
Upuninae (1 genera): Upuna<br />
Sunaptinae (2 genera):<br />
Cotylelobium, Sunaptea (2 sections)<br />
Vaticinae (1 genus): Vatica pro<br />
parte (2 sections)<br />
Stemonoporinae (1 genera):<br />
Stemonoporus (2 sub-groups)<br />
Vaterinae (2 genera): Vateria,<br />
Vateriopsis<br />
31<br />
another line <strong>of</strong> similarities leads to Anisoptera, Vateria<br />
and Vateriopsis.<br />
Pollen, embryo and seedling characters, as well as<br />
parsimony analysis <strong>of</strong> molecular data (Tsumura et al.<br />
1993, Wickneswari 1993), show similar conclusions. By<br />
the pollen surface Anthoshorea resemble<br />
Dryobalanops, Doona, Neobalanocarpus heimii and<br />
Cotylelobium, and a basic similarity exists between<br />
Dryobalanops and Dipterocarpus, as with cotyledonary<br />
shapes.