24.04.2013 Views

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Biogeography and Evolutionary Systematics <strong>of</strong> Dipterocarpaceae<br />

agamospermy. Intraspecific polyploidy has been<br />

reported in Hopea odorata and Dipterocarpus<br />

tuberculatus (Jong 1976).<br />

It has been demonstrated that certain species produce<br />

polyembryonic seeds (Maury 1968, 1970a, b, Kaur et<br />

al. 1978). Shorea ovalis ssp. sericea is tetraploid with<br />

frequent polyembryony. These polyembryos originate<br />

from nucellar cells at the micropilar end <strong>of</strong> the ovule<br />

(Jong and Kaur 1979). However, fruit <strong>for</strong>mation in S.<br />

ovalis requires stimulation <strong>of</strong> pollination (Chan 1980),<br />

which is pseudogamous. Pollen tubes have been observed<br />

in some embryological preparations, thus the possibility<br />

exists that a zygotic embryo is sometimes <strong>for</strong>med. Some<br />

participation by embryo-sac cells other than the egg in<br />

the <strong>for</strong>mation <strong>of</strong> pro-embryos, in addition to those<br />

derived from the nucellus (Jong and Kaur 1979), could<br />

also be possible.<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> chromosome number (odd<br />

polyploidy) and other tentative evidence, it may be<br />

inferred that all triploids or near triploids (Kaur et al.<br />

1978) may also be apomicts with polyembryony. The<br />

triploid condition may have arisen in some cases from<br />

hybridisation between diploid and tetraploid congeners.<br />

Agamospermy may indeed provide a mechanism <strong>for</strong><br />

overcoming chromosome sterility, and/or <strong>for</strong> the<br />

stabilisation <strong>of</strong> a heterozygous combination favoured by<br />

natural selection (Grant 1971 in Jong and Kaur 1979).<br />

A close association between agamospermy,<br />

polyploidy and hybridity has been demonstrated in a wide<br />

range <strong>of</strong> temperate angiosperms (Gustafsson 1947,<br />

Stebbins 1960). Even though much available evidence is<br />

indirect, such a pattern may also occur in Shorea and<br />

Hopea.<br />

Apomictic plants are troublesome <strong>for</strong> taxonomists<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the multitude <strong>of</strong> biotypes or microspecies<br />

that result from agamospermous reproduction; the<br />

periodic occurrence <strong>of</strong> hybridisation involving<br />

facultative apomicts and related sexual species generate<br />

additional variant <strong>for</strong>ms which add to the complexity <strong>of</strong><br />

the variation pattern. Some classificatory difficulties in<br />

Dipterocarpaceae at the supraspecific level presented by<br />

Shorea and Hopea may well be attributable to the<br />

presence in each genus <strong>of</strong> species groups or agamic<br />

complexes in which sexual and related agamospermous<br />

taxa exist side by side. Agamospermy whether facultative<br />

or obligate could well be an important contributory factor<br />

to the floristic diversity <strong>of</strong> the lowland mixed dipterocarp<br />

rain <strong>for</strong>ests <strong>of</strong> southeast Asia (Kaur et al. 1978).<br />

30<br />

Present Classifications<br />

The four more recent classifications (Tables 1, 2, 8) <strong>of</strong><br />

the family Dipterocarpaceae (Ashton 1964, 1968, 1982,<br />

Meijer 1963, 1979, Maury 1978, Maury-Lechon 1979a,<br />

b, Maury-Lechon and Ponge 1979, Kostermans 1978,<br />

1992) have retained large parts <strong>of</strong> the previous<br />

classifications from Heim (1892) and Symington<br />

(1943).<br />

Meijer has only taken into consideration the genera<br />

growing in Sabah and Kostermans has centered his works<br />

on Sri Lankan taxa and the three non-Asian genera.<br />

Ashton had a taxonomical approach, while Maury-<br />

Lechon concentrated on the definition <strong>of</strong> natural groups<br />

and their phylogenetic trends. They both utilised the<br />

results <strong>of</strong> anatomy studies produced by Whitmore (1963)<br />

on bark, Gottwald and Parameswaran (1964) and Brazier<br />

(1979) on wood. Likewise, they used works on cytology<br />

from Jong and Kaur (1979), embryology,<br />

chemotaxonomy (Ourisson et al. 1965, Diaz and<br />

Ourisson 1966, Diaz et al. 1966, Ourisson 1979) and<br />

Main aspects <strong>of</strong> Ashton’s classification (see also<br />

Tables 1, 2, 8)<br />

Taxonomical levels<br />

Family (1): Dipterocarpaceae (16 genera, 3<br />

sub-families, 2 tribes)<br />

Sub-families (3): Pakaraimoideae: 1 monospecific<br />

genus, 2 sub-species<br />

Monotoideae: 2 genera Monotes<br />

(more than 24 species),<br />

Marquesia (about 3 species)<br />

Dipterocarpoideae (2 tribes, 13<br />

genera, 17 sections, 12 subsections):<br />

Tribes (2): Dipterocarpi (8 genera, 4-5<br />

sections): Dipterocarpus,<br />

Anisoptera (2 sections), Upuna,<br />

Cotylelobium, Vatica (2-3<br />

sections), Stemonoporus,<br />

Vateria, Vateriopsis.<br />

Shoreae (5 genera, 13 sections,<br />

12 sub-sections): Hopea (2<br />

sections, 4 subsections), Shorea<br />

(11 sections, 8 subsections),<br />

Parashorea, Neobalanocarpus,<br />

Dryobalanops.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!