A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Biogeography and Evolutionary Systematics <strong>of</strong> Dipterocarpaceae<br />
agamospermy. Intraspecific polyploidy has been<br />
reported in Hopea odorata and Dipterocarpus<br />
tuberculatus (Jong 1976).<br />
It has been demonstrated that certain species produce<br />
polyembryonic seeds (Maury 1968, 1970a, b, Kaur et<br />
al. 1978). Shorea ovalis ssp. sericea is tetraploid with<br />
frequent polyembryony. These polyembryos originate<br />
from nucellar cells at the micropilar end <strong>of</strong> the ovule<br />
(Jong and Kaur 1979). However, fruit <strong>for</strong>mation in S.<br />
ovalis requires stimulation <strong>of</strong> pollination (Chan 1980),<br />
which is pseudogamous. Pollen tubes have been observed<br />
in some embryological preparations, thus the possibility<br />
exists that a zygotic embryo is sometimes <strong>for</strong>med. Some<br />
participation by embryo-sac cells other than the egg in<br />
the <strong>for</strong>mation <strong>of</strong> pro-embryos, in addition to those<br />
derived from the nucellus (Jong and Kaur 1979), could<br />
also be possible.<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> chromosome number (odd<br />
polyploidy) and other tentative evidence, it may be<br />
inferred that all triploids or near triploids (Kaur et al.<br />
1978) may also be apomicts with polyembryony. The<br />
triploid condition may have arisen in some cases from<br />
hybridisation between diploid and tetraploid congeners.<br />
Agamospermy may indeed provide a mechanism <strong>for</strong><br />
overcoming chromosome sterility, and/or <strong>for</strong> the<br />
stabilisation <strong>of</strong> a heterozygous combination favoured by<br />
natural selection (Grant 1971 in Jong and Kaur 1979).<br />
A close association between agamospermy,<br />
polyploidy and hybridity has been demonstrated in a wide<br />
range <strong>of</strong> temperate angiosperms (Gustafsson 1947,<br />
Stebbins 1960). Even though much available evidence is<br />
indirect, such a pattern may also occur in Shorea and<br />
Hopea.<br />
Apomictic plants are troublesome <strong>for</strong> taxonomists<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the multitude <strong>of</strong> biotypes or microspecies<br />
that result from agamospermous reproduction; the<br />
periodic occurrence <strong>of</strong> hybridisation involving<br />
facultative apomicts and related sexual species generate<br />
additional variant <strong>for</strong>ms which add to the complexity <strong>of</strong><br />
the variation pattern. Some classificatory difficulties in<br />
Dipterocarpaceae at the supraspecific level presented by<br />
Shorea and Hopea may well be attributable to the<br />
presence in each genus <strong>of</strong> species groups or agamic<br />
complexes in which sexual and related agamospermous<br />
taxa exist side by side. Agamospermy whether facultative<br />
or obligate could well be an important contributory factor<br />
to the floristic diversity <strong>of</strong> the lowland mixed dipterocarp<br />
rain <strong>for</strong>ests <strong>of</strong> southeast Asia (Kaur et al. 1978).<br />
30<br />
Present Classifications<br />
The four more recent classifications (Tables 1, 2, 8) <strong>of</strong><br />
the family Dipterocarpaceae (Ashton 1964, 1968, 1982,<br />
Meijer 1963, 1979, Maury 1978, Maury-Lechon 1979a,<br />
b, Maury-Lechon and Ponge 1979, Kostermans 1978,<br />
1992) have retained large parts <strong>of</strong> the previous<br />
classifications from Heim (1892) and Symington<br />
(1943).<br />
Meijer has only taken into consideration the genera<br />
growing in Sabah and Kostermans has centered his works<br />
on Sri Lankan taxa and the three non-Asian genera.<br />
Ashton had a taxonomical approach, while Maury-<br />
Lechon concentrated on the definition <strong>of</strong> natural groups<br />
and their phylogenetic trends. They both utilised the<br />
results <strong>of</strong> anatomy studies produced by Whitmore (1963)<br />
on bark, Gottwald and Parameswaran (1964) and Brazier<br />
(1979) on wood. Likewise, they used works on cytology<br />
from Jong and Kaur (1979), embryology,<br />
chemotaxonomy (Ourisson et al. 1965, Diaz and<br />
Ourisson 1966, Diaz et al. 1966, Ourisson 1979) and<br />
Main aspects <strong>of</strong> Ashton’s classification (see also<br />
Tables 1, 2, 8)<br />
Taxonomical levels<br />
Family (1): Dipterocarpaceae (16 genera, 3<br />
sub-families, 2 tribes)<br />
Sub-families (3): Pakaraimoideae: 1 monospecific<br />
genus, 2 sub-species<br />
Monotoideae: 2 genera Monotes<br />
(more than 24 species),<br />
Marquesia (about 3 species)<br />
Dipterocarpoideae (2 tribes, 13<br />
genera, 17 sections, 12 subsections):<br />
Tribes (2): Dipterocarpi (8 genera, 4-5<br />
sections): Dipterocarpus,<br />
Anisoptera (2 sections), Upuna,<br />
Cotylelobium, Vatica (2-3<br />
sections), Stemonoporus,<br />
Vateria, Vateriopsis.<br />
Shoreae (5 genera, 13 sections,<br />
12 sub-sections): Hopea (2<br />
sections, 4 subsections), Shorea<br />
(11 sections, 8 subsections),<br />
Parashorea, Neobalanocarpus,<br />
Dryobalanops.