A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Biogeography and Evolutionary Systematics <strong>of</strong> Dipterocarpaceae<br />
Consistent Criteria <strong>for</strong> Definition <strong>of</strong> Species and<br />
Sub-species<br />
Consistent criteria (Ashton 1979a) <strong>for</strong> definition <strong>of</strong><br />
species and sub-species were expressed <strong>for</strong><br />
Dipterocarpaceae as follows:<br />
1. Size differences are not by themselves sufficient,<br />
neither are differences <strong>of</strong> leaf size and shape combined.<br />
Differences in fruit size are likewise unreliable<br />
and rarely correlate with other characters; collections<br />
from one tree in different years <strong>of</strong>ten exhibit<br />
great variation. A consistent discontinuity in leaf<br />
size, when correlated with differences in androecium<br />
or gynoecium, in qualitative (not quantitative) characters<br />
<strong>of</strong> indumentum, with qualitative characters <strong>of</strong><br />
the twig or stipule or with a discontinuity in the range<br />
in the number <strong>of</strong> leaf nerves does constitute an adequate<br />
criterion <strong>for</strong> separating species.<br />
2. Subspecies can be defined where discontinuities occur<br />
in the range <strong>of</strong> dimensions <strong>of</strong> parts, in tomentum<br />
distribution and in density. However, sometimes taxa<br />
which share a unique qualitative character, especially<br />
<strong>of</strong> fruit or flower, are recognised as subspecies even<br />
though they may differ qualitatively in vegetative<br />
parts.<br />
Experience has shown that this definition <strong>of</strong><br />
subspecies is sometimes too conservative (<strong>for</strong> example,<br />
Shorea macroptera ssp. baillonii and ssp.<br />
macropterifolia occur together in some <strong>for</strong>ests, Vatica<br />
oblongifolia ssp. multinervosa, ssp. crassilobata and<br />
ssp. oblongifolia do seem at times to intergrade. This<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> subspecies, albeit consistent, is essentially<br />
arbitrary but may be useful when evidence <strong>of</strong><br />
hybridisation in nature is unavailable.<br />
Ontogenetic Aspects <strong>of</strong> Morphological and<br />
Anatomical Characters<br />
In Dipterocarpaceae decisions on the primitiveness or<br />
derived conditions <strong>of</strong> characters are drawn from personal<br />
hypotheses on the evolutionary trends within and between<br />
angiosperm families. Ontogenic trends may follow<br />
evolutionary trends. Even in the absence <strong>of</strong> this<br />
relationship, study <strong>of</strong> the embryonic trends helps to<br />
understand taxonomic relations.<br />
Chemotaxonomic studies have shown (Ourisson<br />
1979) the existence <strong>of</strong> certain chemical directions <strong>for</strong><br />
molecular construction in the family: from the epoxyde<br />
<strong>of</strong> squalene to the triterpenes <strong>of</strong> the resins, in all species<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>dipterocarps</strong> sensu stricto.<br />
29<br />
The embryogenesis from seed germination to young<br />
seedling in <strong>dipterocarps</strong> analysed by Maury-Lechon has<br />
demonstrated a unique direction <strong>for</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong><br />
the vascular structures in cotyledon node and petiole,<br />
from simple to very complex (Maury 1978, Maury-<br />
Lechon 1979a, b, Maury-Lechon and Ponge 1979). This<br />
trend exists in certain species at different developmental<br />
phases and morphological levels (node: base, mid-part,<br />
top <strong>of</strong> petiole) within a single plant (e.g. Vateria<br />
copallifera in Maury-Lechon 1979b; photographs Fig.<br />
49). In other species the trend may be visible by<br />
comparing plants <strong>of</strong> a given species (most genera <strong>of</strong> the<br />
family: Dipterocarpus, Dryobalanops, Parashorea,<br />
Vatica sections Vaticae and Pachynocarpus, Vateria,<br />
Hopea and Shorea) or by comparison <strong>of</strong> different<br />
species at a given stage <strong>of</strong> development and<br />
morphological level as, <strong>for</strong> example, from the simple<br />
trilacunar vascular structures <strong>of</strong> cotyledonary petiole in<br />
Shorea curtisii, to the increasing complexity <strong>of</strong><br />
Stemonoporus affinis, S. reticulatus and finally the<br />
trilacunar appearance <strong>of</strong> the very complex structure <strong>of</strong><br />
Vateria copallifera (Maury 1978, Maury-Lechon<br />
1979b). Simplest structures (unilacunar with a single<br />
resin canal in cotyledonary node) are remarkable in<br />
Sunaptea, Cotylelobium, Upuna and also exist in certain<br />
Hopea, Anthoshorea, Richetioides and Muticae.<br />
Monotes and Marquesia have different (no canals and<br />
different organisation <strong>of</strong> vascular bundles) and more<br />
complex structures than the Asian simplest <strong>for</strong>ms.<br />
These simplest structures correspond to the taxa with<br />
small winged fruits, well dispersed by wind, thus again<br />
with the open areas and long distance migrations. These<br />
structures allow a better putative relation with the African<br />
and American taxa (simple but <strong>of</strong> different type and<br />
devoid <strong>of</strong> resin canals). They could evoke ancestral<br />
dipterocarp migrations in more open, windy and perhaps<br />
drier environments than those <strong>of</strong> the present rain <strong>for</strong>est.<br />
Polyploidy, Polyembryony, Apomixy and<br />
Variability <strong>of</strong> Dipterocarp Characters<br />
The two basic chromosome numbers tend to remain<br />
constant within a single genus and between groups <strong>of</strong><br />
genera even in heterogeneous genera like Shorea and<br />
Hopea. It is premature to say which <strong>of</strong> the numbers is<br />
derived or ancestral (Jong and Kaur 1979). There is a<br />
low frequency <strong>of</strong> polyploidy series and intraspecific<br />
polyploids in the Asian genera Shorea and Hopea,<br />
especially in cases where polyploidy is associated with