A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Biogeography and Evolutionary Systematics <strong>of</strong> Dipterocarpaceae<br />
or ruptures <strong>of</strong> continental drifts: a) by lack <strong>of</strong> marine<br />
influence the Permian continental block (Fig. 2 (A), 3)<br />
would have been drier than the previous split continents<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Carboniferous with its luxurious Cryptogamic<br />
flora; b) the split <strong>of</strong> Gondwanaland during the Secondary<br />
would have permitted marine humidity to enter the<br />
fragmented lands (Fig. 2 (B, C) and probably the first<br />
Angiosperm ancestral <strong>for</strong>ms to originate; c) the supposed<br />
late Cretaceous - early Eocene (Renous 1989, Dercourt<br />
et al. 1992) connection <strong>of</strong> India with Eurasia (Fig. 2 (D)),<br />
between -65 and -40 million years, and later that <strong>of</strong> Africa<br />
(Fig. 2 (E)), would have created new dry and humid zones<br />
and corresponded to the differentiation <strong>of</strong> Angiosperms<br />
(and dipterocarp ancestors?).<br />
According to these reconstituted changes, the flora<br />
<strong>of</strong> past continents from Permian (Primary) to Miocene<br />
(Tertiary) times had a very ancient common history (land<br />
and climate). Later on the future southern part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Eurasian southeast zone first separated from the rest <strong>of</strong><br />
Eurasia (Fig. 2 (B): Triassic: hatched area, Fig. 3) and<br />
then (the upper Jurassic) connected with it (Fig. 2 (C, D,<br />
E)). Wallace’s line corresponds to the separation between<br />
lands <strong>of</strong> different origins: the two Gondwanan shelves,<br />
the Indian on the west and the Australian on the east (Fig.<br />
2 (C)).<br />
For long geological periods (lower to extreme upper<br />
Cretaceous period, Secondary) the Indian-Seychelles-<br />
Sri Lanka part <strong>of</strong> the Gondwana shelf remained under an<br />
insular situation. For similar long periods the present<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> mainland southeast Asia, China and Malesia<br />
pro-parte remained separated from the Indian island, but<br />
perhaps intermittently connected to Eurasia. The Indian<br />
collision with Eurasia produced huge changes (land,<br />
climate, flora) as well as possibilities (or difficulties)<br />
<strong>of</strong> colonisation and species evolution <strong>for</strong> both types <strong>of</strong><br />
flora (the insular-Indian flora and the continental-Asian<br />
flora) in the new territories.<br />
Paths <strong>of</strong> Possible Flora Migrations<br />
Four main land connections are thus suggested <strong>for</strong><br />
eventual migrations <strong>of</strong> the ancestors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>dipterocarps</strong>,<br />
at different periods after the Gondwana split: a) India-<br />
Sri Lanka-Madagascar-Africa-America-Eurasia (Fig. 2<br />
(C)); b) the putative eastern archipelago northeast <strong>of</strong><br />
Gondwana to Eurasia (Fig. 3); c) later, India-Sri Lanka-<br />
Eurasia (Fig. 2 (C, D)); and d) finally northeast Africa -<br />
Southeast Eurasia (Fig. 2 (E)). Because <strong>of</strong> the distances,<br />
land dimensions and climate history, the first connection<br />
21<br />
could have favoured the success and survival <strong>of</strong> species<br />
with small winged fruits, the second could have aided<br />
species with water dispersal, while the third could have<br />
permitted the persistence and establishment <strong>of</strong> more<br />
diverse biological types. Perhaps excessively dry<br />
climates did not favour dipterocarp migrations in the<br />
fourth case.<br />
These geological events bring light to the present<br />
distribution over three continents and the paucity east<br />
<strong>of</strong> Wallace’s line. They explain certain endemic aspects<br />
such as the Monotes kerstingii disjuncted area in Africa<br />
(survival at the periphery <strong>of</strong> the rain <strong>for</strong>est newly<br />
established in the previously drier area <strong>of</strong> Monotes).<br />
They could justify Upuna in Borneo, and localisation <strong>of</strong><br />
Vateriopsis, Vateria, Stemonoporus and Doona in the<br />
Indian island zone. These events underline the existence<br />
<strong>of</strong> a very long past <strong>of</strong> successive modifications, and help<br />
to explain the real difficulty in finding primitive features<br />
in present flora. If characters evolved independently<br />
from each other, a single present taxon might have<br />
retained some primitive aspects and modified others;<br />
these latter preventing consideration as an ancestral <strong>for</strong>m.<br />
Endemicity <strong>of</strong> Dipterocarps Sensu Lato<br />
As expected, the higher endemicity is located at the<br />
extremes <strong>of</strong> the geographical area <strong>of</strong> distribution. It is<br />
due to monospecific genera westward in south America<br />
(100%: 2 sp.), Madagascar (100%: 1 sp.) and Seychelles<br />
(100%: 1 sp.). Endemicity is <strong>of</strong> different intensity (Table<br />
7) eastward in Sri Lanka (98%: 43/44 spp.), south India<br />
(85%: 11/13 spp.) and in New Guinea (73%: 11/15 spp.),<br />
and with a much lower proportion in Borneo (58 to 55%:<br />
158 to 155/267 spp. <strong>of</strong> which 1 is a monospecific<br />
endemic genus), north Peninsular Malaysia (49%: 23/<br />
47 spp.) and the Philippines (47%: 21/45 spp.) and north<br />
India (40%: 4/13 spp.). A certain endemicity also exists<br />
in the other Malesian areas but the values rapidly<br />
decrease: Celebes (29%), Java (20%), Peninsular<br />
Malaysia (17-18%), Moluccas (16%). Peninsular<br />
Malaysia, Sumatra and Borneo only separated 10,000<br />
years B.P. and, if taken as one biogeographic region, its<br />
endemicity is 293/345 species or 85% when the<br />
boundary is determined by the Kangar/Pattani line, 303/<br />
345 species or 87% when the boundary is the Isthmus<br />
<strong>of</strong> Kra.<br />
Endemicity is very reduced on a country to country<br />
basis (Vietnam 9%, Laos 5%), or absent in the mainland<br />
southeast Asian phytogeographical area (Burma, Thailand,<br />
Cambodia; however, <strong>for</strong> Indo-Burma as one<br />
biogeographic region it is high), and totally absent from