A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Plantations 157<br />
Malaysia, flowering and fruiting are regularly observed<br />
over a wide geographical and climatic range and reliable<br />
records are available. Darus et al. (1994) proposed the<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> seed production stands in the main<br />
climatic regions <strong>of</strong> Peninsular Malaysia and a<br />
corresponding tree selection and tree improvement<br />
programme. Similar ef<strong>for</strong>ts on tree improvement<br />
involving <strong>dipterocarps</strong> have been made in Bangladesh<br />
(Nandy and Chowdury 1994), India (Negi 1994),<br />
Philippines (Rosario and Abarquez 1994) and in Thailand<br />
(Sa-Ardavut 1994). Much <strong>of</strong> the improvement work in<br />
the region is coordinated within the Species Improvement<br />
Network (Anon. 1994).<br />
Seedling planting stock<br />
‘In nursery practice, a seedling is a very young tree that<br />
has not been transplanted, i.e. is growing where it<br />
germinated’ (Ford-Robertson 1983). Seedling planting<br />
stock <strong>for</strong> most dipterocarp species is usually potted and<br />
leaves the nursery after about 9 months. The seedling<br />
height is about 25-50 cm.<br />
Generative propagation is still the prevailing method<br />
<strong>of</strong> plant production in <strong>dipterocarps</strong> and is technically not<br />
a problem if seeds are planted immediately after<br />
collection. Timber companies involved in propagation<br />
<strong>of</strong> dipterocarp seedlings have the expertise to run largescale<br />
dipterocarp nurseries pr<strong>of</strong>essionally e.g., in<br />
Indonesia or Sabah (Moura-Costa 1993). The literature<br />
on the propagation <strong>of</strong> dipterocarp seedlings deals mainly<br />
with planting stock type (e.g., Walton 1938, Barnard<br />
1954, Pande 1960, Joshi 1959), sowing position <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds (Serjuddoula and Rahman 1985), response <strong>of</strong><br />
potted seedlings to fertilisers (Kaul et al. 1966, Bruzon<br />
1978, 1982, Sundralingam 1983, Sundralingam et al.<br />
1985), controlled mycorrhization (Garbaye 1989,<br />
Santoso 1989, Santoso et al. 1989), the use <strong>of</strong> bare-root<br />
plants (Sasaki 1980b, Mori 1981).<br />
As far as the age <strong>of</strong> the planting stock is concerned<br />
Barnard (1954) found that <strong>for</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the dipterocarp<br />
species planting stock between 3 and 8 months old is<br />
the best (e.g., Dryobalanops aromatica, Shorea<br />
leprosula and S. pauciflora). Hodgson (1937a)<br />
concluded that planting stock only a few months old is<br />
more likely to survive than older material. Seedlings <strong>of</strong><br />
Anisoptera sp., Dryobalanops aromatica and<br />
Neobalanocarpus heimii were planted with cotyledons<br />
still attached. While D. aromatica was destroyed by<br />
rodents, the two other species survived. Kuraishy (1942)<br />
transplanted 6-week old seedlings <strong>of</strong> Shorea robusta<br />
successfully.<br />
Lamprecht (1989) proposes the use <strong>of</strong> 15-20 cm<br />
tall planting stock <strong>for</strong> economic and handling reasons.<br />
Which plant size to choose, should depend on the<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> the planting sites, that is, those with<br />
intensive weed growth require larger planting stock. To<br />
reduce the amount <strong>of</strong> weeding it is preferable to plant<br />
seedlings which are large enough to overcome weed<br />
competition at an early stage although growth rates might<br />
not be better than those <strong>of</strong> smaller planting stock. Planting<br />
stock size is an important aspect but root:shoot ratio,<br />
leaf area and diameter:height ratio are as important.<br />
Sturdy plants with a low root-collar:shoot ratio tend to<br />
<strong>for</strong>m roots faster and are better equipped to withstand<br />
drought stress. In a trial carried out by Moura-Costa (not<br />
dated) initial height growth rates were significantly better<br />
<strong>for</strong> sturdier plants. Species tested were: Dipterocarpus<br />
gracilis, Dryobalanops lanceolata, Parashorea<br />
malaanonan, Shorea johorensis, S. leprosula, S. ovalis<br />
and S. parvifolia.<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> planting stock is another factor to be<br />
considered. Potted seedlings proved to be superior to<br />
bare-root planting stock (e.g., Anon. 1948a, Barnard<br />
1949b). With the exception <strong>of</strong> a few hardy species, the<br />
survival <strong>of</strong> bare-rooted stock seems to be low (e.g., Cerna<br />
and Abarquez 1959). Rayos (1940) tested the survival<br />
<strong>of</strong> bare-rooted seedlings <strong>of</strong> Hopea pierrei <strong>of</strong> different<br />
sizes with their roots stored in moist sawdust be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
planting out. Survival was inversely proportional to<br />
storage period and seedling size. The smallest height<br />
tested was 10-20cm. Prasad (1988) found in a plantation<br />
trial on bauxite mining land that survival and growth <strong>of</strong><br />
potted S. robusta plants were superior to that <strong>of</strong> plants<br />
from direct sowing.<br />
Specific treatment <strong>of</strong> seedlings, such as shoot and<br />
root-pruning and the effect on growth and survival have<br />
been investigated. Root-pruning gave better survival and<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> planting stock. Walton (1938), Landon (1948b)<br />
and Barnard (1954) showed that survival and growth <strong>of</strong><br />
Dryobalanops aromatica seedlings were superior when<br />
seedlings were wrenched (tap root severed) compared<br />
to unwrenched seedlings. The effects <strong>of</strong> shoot-pruning<br />
and stripping <strong>of</strong> the leaves on survival were inconclusive.<br />
Landon (1948b) planted Dryobalanops aromatica under<br />
the shade <strong>of</strong> a 20-year old Fragraea fragrans stand and<br />
topping, partial or total stripping <strong>of</strong> leaves had no effect<br />
on survival. Sasaki (1980a) pruned bare-rooted seedlings<br />
Shorea talura and Hopea odorata (removal <strong>of</strong> all leaves,<br />
all young parts <strong>of</strong> the stems and the tap root) and was