24.04.2013 Views

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Plantations 156<br />

and no longer in need <strong>of</strong> special protection or special<br />

tending, but only routine cleaning, thinning and pruning<br />

(definition according to Ford-Robertson 1983).<br />

Species Choice<br />

Up to now, little systematic species elimination work<br />

has been done on plantation species with the exception<br />

<strong>of</strong> Shorea robusta, around which a complete silvicultural<br />

and agri-silvicultural system has developed. Anderson<br />

(1975) proposed Shorea spp. <strong>of</strong> the pinanga group (e.g.,<br />

Shorea macrophylla, S. pinanga and S. stenoptera) as<br />

an agricultural crop. Jha et al. (1991) have discussed the<br />

selection and evaluation <strong>of</strong> suitable tree species and food<br />

crops <strong>for</strong> agro-<strong>for</strong>estry systems which include Shorea<br />

robusta.<br />

In the Malaysian context Wyatt-Smith (1963b)<br />

presented a list <strong>of</strong> species with promise <strong>for</strong> plantation<br />

establishment. They were selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> 16<br />

criteria, <strong>for</strong> example, fruiting frequence, seed viability,<br />

collection and nursery handling, fast, early height growth,<br />

natural bole <strong>for</strong>m, self-pruning capacity, timber<br />

properties, etc. The species proposed were: Anisoptera<br />

laevis, A. scaphula, Dipterocarpus baudii, D.<br />

costulatus, D. grandiflorus, D. kerrii, D. verrucosus,<br />

Dryobalanops aromatica, D. oblongifolia, Hopea<br />

odorata, Shorea acuminata, S. curtisii, S. leprosula,<br />

S. macrophylla, S. macroptera, S. ovalis, S. parvifolia,<br />

S. pauciflora and S. platyclados.<br />

Recently, an assessment <strong>of</strong> the dipterocarp<br />

plantation stands at the Forest <strong>Research</strong> Institute<br />

Malaysia was carried out in the field and from<br />

phenological and plantation records (Zuhaidi and<br />

Weinland 1994, Appanah and Weinland 1996). The<br />

indicators used were: overall diameter growth rate, initial<br />

height growth rate, stem shape, seedling adaptation phase,<br />

natural pruning capacity, cutting propagation capacity, site<br />

specificity, natural regeneration capacity within the<br />

rotation age, susceptibility to diseases and mode <strong>of</strong><br />

growth. The result was that the dipterocarp species<br />

differed considerably in some aspects, especially in<br />

growth <strong>for</strong>m, mode <strong>of</strong> growth, site specificity and natural<br />

regeneration capacity. In the case <strong>of</strong> undesirable mode<br />

<strong>of</strong> growth, the species was nevertheless considered<br />

suitable <strong>for</strong> planting, if the deficiency could be corrected<br />

by simple silvicultural means. As a result, 15 dipterocarp<br />

species were chosen <strong>for</strong> immediate inclusion into<br />

plantation programmes (Anisoptera laevis, A. scaphula,<br />

Dipterocarpus baudii, D. costulatus, D. kerrii,<br />

Dryobalanops aromatica, D. oblongifolia, Hopea<br />

odorata, Shorea acuminata, S. leprosula, S.<br />

macroptera, S. macrophylla, S. parvifolia, S.<br />

platyclados and S. ovalis), and 2 species (S. bracteolata<br />

and S. curtisii) were considered promising, but were not<br />

included because <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> sufficient in<strong>for</strong>mation and<br />

doubtful field characteristics. For the Bornean part <strong>of</strong><br />

Malaysia species could be added, such as Parashorea<br />

malaanonan, Shorea fallax and S. smithiana, and <strong>for</strong><br />

Indonesia Dryobalanops lanceolata, Shorea laevis, S.<br />

macrophylla and S. selanica. The most common<br />

plantation species in the Philippines are Dipterocarpus<br />

grandiflorus, Shorea almon, S. contorta, S. guiso, S.<br />

polysperma and S. squamata (e.g., Assidao 1950,<br />

Cacanindin 1983, Abalus et al. 1991). Systematic<br />

species/provenance elimination trials are urgently<br />

needed, particularly in relation to the more pronounced<br />

seasonality following the extensive removal <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests in many regions <strong>of</strong> the humid tropics.<br />

Planting Stock Production<br />

Seed<br />

Much ef<strong>for</strong>t has been invested in developing methods<br />

<strong>for</strong> seed production, collection and handling. Generally,<br />

<strong>dipterocarps</strong> fruit at irregular intervals and with varying<br />

seed yield. On top <strong>of</strong> that, seed viability declines. This<br />

field is <strong>review</strong>ed in Chapter 4. Tompsett (1991) has<br />

<strong>review</strong>ed the storage aspects <strong>of</strong> dipterocarp seeds. Much<br />

is also known about germination (e.g., Caguioa 1938,<br />

Jensen 1971, Tixier 1973, Chai 1973, Masano 1988a, b,<br />

Ng and Mat Asri 1991, and others), the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

harvesting time and sowing interval on germination<br />

(Haque et al. 1985), the effect <strong>of</strong> fruit ripeness upon<br />

germination and seedling growth <strong>of</strong> Shorea ovalis<br />

(Kosasih 1987), the effect <strong>of</strong> fruit collection time on<br />

the germination <strong>of</strong> Dryobalanops aromatica (Barnard<br />

1954), the effect <strong>of</strong> seed size on germination <strong>of</strong> Shorea<br />

contorta (Basada 1979), the effect <strong>of</strong> wing colour on<br />

the germination <strong>of</strong> Shorea pinanga and S. stenoptera<br />

(Masano 1988b) and the effect <strong>of</strong> tree girth on seed<br />

viability and germination <strong>of</strong> Shorea robusta (Yadav et<br />

al.1986). Overall, the storage/germination/viability<br />

aspects are sufficiently covered.<br />

There is definitely a lack <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation on the seed<br />

yield from trees and stands (quantity <strong>of</strong> seeds during a<br />

normal seed year). Such in<strong>for</strong>mation is only available <strong>for</strong><br />

Shorea robusta (Jain 1962, Sharma 1981). In Peninsular

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!