24.04.2013 Views

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Management <strong>of</strong> Natural Forests<br />

0.82 cm/yr; logged <strong>for</strong>est, 0.93 cm/yr; plantation, 1.22<br />

cm/yr) (Primack et al. 1989). In any case, among the<br />

commercial species, <strong>dipterocarps</strong> grow much more<br />

vigourously than non-<strong>dipterocarps</strong>, by at least 25-35%<br />

(e.g. periodic diameter mean annual increment <strong>for</strong> Labis<br />

F. R., Peninsular Malaysia: <strong>dipterocarps</strong>, 0.85 cm/yr;<br />

non-dipterocarp commercials, 0.66 cm/yr) (Tang and<br />

Wan Razali 1981). Among the <strong>dipterocarps</strong> the light<br />

hardwoods grow faster than the heavy ones (growth rates<br />

in Peninsular Malaysia sample plantation plots: light<br />

hardwood Shorea macrophylla, 2.23 cm/yr; heavy<br />

hardwood Shorea sumatrana, 0.86 cm/yr) (Appanah and<br />

Weinland 1993). Growth rate, expressed in diameter<br />

increment, is lowest with smaller individuals, and<br />

culminates usually in the 50-60 cm diameter classes,<br />

and declines in bigger trees. This pattern <strong>of</strong> diameter<br />

increment has been seen in the Philippines (Weidelt and<br />

Banaag 1982), Sabah (Nicholson 1965), and Peninsular<br />

Malaysia (Tang and Wan Razali 1981). A sample from<br />

the Mindanao concessions in the Philippines illustrates<br />

the point:<br />

Following logging or liberation thinning, the<br />

residuals are known to respond to the release by<br />

increasing their growth rates. In general the increments<br />

were highest in the first years after logging, and declined<br />

slowly, and after about the fifth year the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

release seem to cease (Tang and Wadley 1976).<br />

Site\ Age Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5<br />

Peninsular<br />

Malaysia-<br />

Tekam F.R.<br />

Peninsular<br />

Malaysia-<br />

Labis F.R.<br />

dbh class (cm) cm/yr<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

50<br />

60<br />

70<br />

80<br />

90<br />

0.72<br />

0.63<br />

0.57<br />

0.79<br />

0.68<br />

0.71<br />

0.44<br />

0.58<br />

0.69<br />

0.78<br />

0.83<br />

0.86<br />

0.86<br />

0.85<br />

0.79<br />

0.67<br />

0.63<br />

0.57<br />

Besides, the above, the trees grew faster (mean annual<br />

diameter increment) in plots where more timber was<br />

harvested (plot residual basal area) after logging (Tang<br />

and Wadley 1976):<br />

n/a<br />

Residual basal area<br />

(m 2 /ha)<br />

10-16<br />

16-22<br />

>22<br />

140<br />

A peculiar behaviour <strong>of</strong> all tropical trees, including<br />

that <strong>of</strong> <strong>dipterocarps</strong>, is the extremely wide range <strong>of</strong><br />

growth rates <strong>of</strong> individual trees even within the same<br />

diameter class. The variation coefficient may reach 70-<br />

100%. This is illustrated in the mean annual diameter<br />

increment <strong>for</strong> the minimal, maximal and median growth<br />

rates (cm/yr) <strong>of</strong> Shorea species in primary, liberationtreated,<br />

and plantation <strong>for</strong>ests in Sarawak (Primack et<br />

al. 1989):<br />

Mean annual<br />

diameter<br />

increment (cm)<br />

Primary<br />

Forest<br />

Mean annual diameter<br />

increment (cm/yr)<br />

Liberation<br />

Felling<br />

0.44<br />

0.45<br />

0.55<br />

Plantation<br />

Minimum 0.13 0.16 0.80<br />

Maximum 0.82 0.93 1.22<br />

Median 0.30 0.43 0.86<br />

Next is the variation in the growth rates within one<br />

region, and between regions. Studies <strong>of</strong> the annual<br />

diameter increment (cm/yr) <strong>of</strong> <strong>dipterocarps</strong> in the<br />

Philippine (Weidelt 1996) and Sarawak <strong>for</strong>ests (Primack<br />

et al. 1989) illustrate these points:<br />

Location Mean annual diameter<br />

increment (cm)<br />

Sarawak:<br />

Mersing<br />

Bako<br />

Philippines:<br />

Mindanao<br />

Visayas<br />

Luzon<br />

0.41<br />

0.30<br />

0.73<br />

0.48<br />

0.52<br />

It should be noted that <strong>dipterocarps</strong> on fertile sites<br />

in the high rainfall area <strong>of</strong> eastern Mindanao have high<br />

annual increments. The growth rates are consistently<br />

better in the Philippines than Sarawak, indicating regional<br />

differences. The <strong>for</strong>ests in the Philippines should<br />

generally have better yields. Even within Sarawak, there<br />

are differences between the two <strong>for</strong>ests, which can be<br />

ascribed mainly to better soil fertility at Mersing.<br />

Despite the existence <strong>of</strong> some good in<strong>for</strong>mation on<br />

the growth <strong>of</strong> dipterocarp trees, there is a tendency to<br />

exaggerate their growth rates. For example, in Peninsular<br />

Malaysia, the generally accepted standard <strong>for</strong> growth <strong>of</strong><br />

trees in logged <strong>for</strong>ests is above 0.8 cm/yr diameter

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!