24.04.2013 Views

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Management <strong>of</strong> Natural Forests<br />

terrain. In situations where it is not economically<br />

equitable <strong>for</strong> the logger, the modified-MUS is prescribed<br />

which imposes an arbitrary diameter <strong>of</strong> 45 cm dbh <strong>for</strong><br />

felling on a rotation <strong>of</strong> 50 years.<br />

Sabah<br />

Silviculture in Sabah followed a path similar to<br />

Peninsular Malaysia. In the early 1930s, RIF were tried<br />

on a limited scale (Fox 1968). In 1949 the Selection<br />

Improvement Fellings were introduced, to assist the<br />

pole-size trees <strong>of</strong> 10 cm dbh and above in areas logged<br />

15 to 25 years be<strong>for</strong>e (Martyn and Udarbe 1976). The<br />

method involved poison-girdling non-commercial<br />

species and climber cuttings.<br />

In 1956 a modified version <strong>of</strong> the MUS was<br />

introduced <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>est regeneration (Chai 1981). The<br />

canopy was opened after felling by poison-girdling all<br />

non-commercial species as well as defective trees <strong>of</strong><br />

commercial species down to 15 cm dbh. The next crop<br />

is expected to come from seedlings, and advance growth<br />

will be a bonus. This system became the standard<br />

regeneration technique <strong>for</strong> dipterocarp <strong>for</strong>ests in Sabah.<br />

This modified MUS underwent further changes in<br />

1971 to become a minimum girth limit system, the so<br />

called Stratified Uni<strong>for</strong>m System (Chai and Udarbe<br />

1977). In this refinement, the advance growth <strong>for</strong> the<br />

next crop is kept. The main elements <strong>of</strong> the system<br />

include marking 25 preferred or desired trees/ha (25-<br />

59 cm dbh) <strong>for</strong> retention, and poison girdling unwanted<br />

and defective trees. Climber cutting and girdling <strong>of</strong> seedbearers<br />

and relics is done in the 15th year.<br />

Later, Chai and Udarbe (1977) expressed doubts on<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> the girdling practices. They argued that since<br />

logging intensity is high, much <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>est gets released<br />

anyway without further treatment. Since then, only<br />

climber cuttings are meant to be done. Furthermore,<br />

girdling <strong>of</strong> weeds or non-commercials has been stopped<br />

on account that such plants may become commercial in<br />

the future, and moreover, the operation may be harmful<br />

to the ecosystem.<br />

Sarawak<br />

The timber industry in Sarawak relied mainly on<br />

extensive peat swamp <strong>for</strong>ests, and moved into the hill<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests only in the late 1960s. Coming so late, Sarawak<br />

tended to follow the systems developed in Peninsular<br />

Malaysia (Lee 1982). At first the <strong>for</strong>ests were selectively<br />

logged. The relics left behind were defective and inferior,<br />

138<br />

and seedlings/saplings unlikely to reach maturity be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

70-80 years.<br />

As a result, three UNDP/FAO projects (1974-1981)<br />

were started to provide interim guidelines <strong>for</strong> managing<br />

Sarawak’s dipterocarp <strong>for</strong>ests (FAO 1981a, b). The study<br />

evaluated three different treatments:<br />

1. Overstorey removal only - All overmature non-marketable<br />

trees left behind during harvesting were removed<br />

by poison-girdling.<br />

2. Malayan Uni<strong>for</strong>m System evaluated - Following logging,<br />

all other non-economical trees, which impeded<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> the seedlings were removed. Such a treatment<br />

was considered too drastic. The rough terrain<br />

and shallow soil conditions are vulnerable to heavy<br />

erosion. A modification to MUS was tried whereby<br />

the advance growth <strong>of</strong> the desirable species were<br />

saved. In this way the advance growth may be obtained<br />

even be<strong>for</strong>e the seedlings mature, giving in effect a<br />

polycyclic system.<br />

3. Liberation Thinning - Desirable species were identified,<br />

and liberated from competition including removal<br />

<strong>of</strong> the overstorey to improve their growth. No<br />

specific species or species groups were eliminated,<br />

only those that restricted the growth <strong>of</strong> the selected<br />

trees. There<strong>for</strong>e, trees <strong>of</strong> non-commercial species<br />

were left behind if they did not appear to hinder selected<br />

trees.<br />

Mild overstorey release was insufficient to release<br />

the trees <strong>of</strong> desirable species. Both the Liberation<br />

Thinning and the modified MUS resulted in increased<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> the residuals (Hutchinson 1979), but the latter<br />

resulted in elimination <strong>of</strong> a greater number <strong>of</strong> trees which<br />

could have commercial value in the future. Despite the<br />

potential loss in the future <strong>of</strong> commercial trees, <strong>for</strong> a<br />

while liberation thinning held sway in Sarawak as the<br />

appropriate silvicultural treatment (FAO 1981b). It lost<br />

support subsequently, when Lee (1982) suggested that<br />

the boost in initial growth is not sustained, the operations<br />

are difficult, and cannot be kept up with the logging rate.<br />

Since then, Liberation Thinning is being carried out <strong>for</strong><br />

a small portion (ca. 4%) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>est logged annually<br />

(Chai 1984). Otherwise, the practice has reverted to<br />

selective felling based on diameter limits.<br />

Philippines<br />

Scientific management <strong>of</strong> dipterocarp <strong>for</strong>ests began<br />

during the American Regime. From 1900 to 1942<br />

mechanised timber extraction and processing methods

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!