A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Management <strong>of</strong> Natural Forests<br />
terrain. In situations where it is not economically<br />
equitable <strong>for</strong> the logger, the modified-MUS is prescribed<br />
which imposes an arbitrary diameter <strong>of</strong> 45 cm dbh <strong>for</strong><br />
felling on a rotation <strong>of</strong> 50 years.<br />
Sabah<br />
Silviculture in Sabah followed a path similar to<br />
Peninsular Malaysia. In the early 1930s, RIF were tried<br />
on a limited scale (Fox 1968). In 1949 the Selection<br />
Improvement Fellings were introduced, to assist the<br />
pole-size trees <strong>of</strong> 10 cm dbh and above in areas logged<br />
15 to 25 years be<strong>for</strong>e (Martyn and Udarbe 1976). The<br />
method involved poison-girdling non-commercial<br />
species and climber cuttings.<br />
In 1956 a modified version <strong>of</strong> the MUS was<br />
introduced <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>est regeneration (Chai 1981). The<br />
canopy was opened after felling by poison-girdling all<br />
non-commercial species as well as defective trees <strong>of</strong><br />
commercial species down to 15 cm dbh. The next crop<br />
is expected to come from seedlings, and advance growth<br />
will be a bonus. This system became the standard<br />
regeneration technique <strong>for</strong> dipterocarp <strong>for</strong>ests in Sabah.<br />
This modified MUS underwent further changes in<br />
1971 to become a minimum girth limit system, the so<br />
called Stratified Uni<strong>for</strong>m System (Chai and Udarbe<br />
1977). In this refinement, the advance growth <strong>for</strong> the<br />
next crop is kept. The main elements <strong>of</strong> the system<br />
include marking 25 preferred or desired trees/ha (25-<br />
59 cm dbh) <strong>for</strong> retention, and poison girdling unwanted<br />
and defective trees. Climber cutting and girdling <strong>of</strong> seedbearers<br />
and relics is done in the 15th year.<br />
Later, Chai and Udarbe (1977) expressed doubts on<br />
the value <strong>of</strong> the girdling practices. They argued that since<br />
logging intensity is high, much <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>est gets released<br />
anyway without further treatment. Since then, only<br />
climber cuttings are meant to be done. Furthermore,<br />
girdling <strong>of</strong> weeds or non-commercials has been stopped<br />
on account that such plants may become commercial in<br />
the future, and moreover, the operation may be harmful<br />
to the ecosystem.<br />
Sarawak<br />
The timber industry in Sarawak relied mainly on<br />
extensive peat swamp <strong>for</strong>ests, and moved into the hill<br />
<strong>for</strong>ests only in the late 1960s. Coming so late, Sarawak<br />
tended to follow the systems developed in Peninsular<br />
Malaysia (Lee 1982). At first the <strong>for</strong>ests were selectively<br />
logged. The relics left behind were defective and inferior,<br />
138<br />
and seedlings/saplings unlikely to reach maturity be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
70-80 years.<br />
As a result, three UNDP/FAO projects (1974-1981)<br />
were started to provide interim guidelines <strong>for</strong> managing<br />
Sarawak’s dipterocarp <strong>for</strong>ests (FAO 1981a, b). The study<br />
evaluated three different treatments:<br />
1. Overstorey removal only - All overmature non-marketable<br />
trees left behind during harvesting were removed<br />
by poison-girdling.<br />
2. Malayan Uni<strong>for</strong>m System evaluated - Following logging,<br />
all other non-economical trees, which impeded<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> the seedlings were removed. Such a treatment<br />
was considered too drastic. The rough terrain<br />
and shallow soil conditions are vulnerable to heavy<br />
erosion. A modification to MUS was tried whereby<br />
the advance growth <strong>of</strong> the desirable species were<br />
saved. In this way the advance growth may be obtained<br />
even be<strong>for</strong>e the seedlings mature, giving in effect a<br />
polycyclic system.<br />
3. Liberation Thinning - Desirable species were identified,<br />
and liberated from competition including removal<br />
<strong>of</strong> the overstorey to improve their growth. No<br />
specific species or species groups were eliminated,<br />
only those that restricted the growth <strong>of</strong> the selected<br />
trees. There<strong>for</strong>e, trees <strong>of</strong> non-commercial species<br />
were left behind if they did not appear to hinder selected<br />
trees.<br />
Mild overstorey release was insufficient to release<br />
the trees <strong>of</strong> desirable species. Both the Liberation<br />
Thinning and the modified MUS resulted in increased<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> the residuals (Hutchinson 1979), but the latter<br />
resulted in elimination <strong>of</strong> a greater number <strong>of</strong> trees which<br />
could have commercial value in the future. Despite the<br />
potential loss in the future <strong>of</strong> commercial trees, <strong>for</strong> a<br />
while liberation thinning held sway in Sarawak as the<br />
appropriate silvicultural treatment (FAO 1981b). It lost<br />
support subsequently, when Lee (1982) suggested that<br />
the boost in initial growth is not sustained, the operations<br />
are difficult, and cannot be kept up with the logging rate.<br />
Since then, Liberation Thinning is being carried out <strong>for</strong><br />
a small portion (ca. 4%) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>est logged annually<br />
(Chai 1984). Otherwise, the practice has reverted to<br />
selective felling based on diameter limits.<br />
Philippines<br />
Scientific management <strong>of</strong> dipterocarp <strong>for</strong>ests began<br />
during the American Regime. From 1900 to 1942<br />
mechanised timber extraction and processing methods